Book contents
- Endorsements
- Global Shareholder Stewardship
- Global Shareholder Stewardship
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Part I Foundations
- Part II Jurisdictions
- 4 Shareholder Stewardship in the Netherlands
- 5 Capitalist Stakeholders
- 6 Institutional Investor Stewardship in Italian Corporate Governance
- 7 The Danish Stewardship Code
- 8 Stewardship Norwegian-Style
- 9 Stewardship and Shareholder Engagement in Germany
- 10 The Japanese Stewardship Code
- 11 Korea’s Stewardship Code and the Rise of Shareholder Activism
- 12 The Assessment of Taiwan’s Shareholder Stewardship Codes
- 13 Stewardship in the Hong Kong International Financial Centre
- 14 Singapore’s Embrace of Shareholder Stewardship
- 15 Institutional Investor Stewardship in Malaysia
- 16 The Thai Institutional Investors Stewardship Code and Its Implementation
- 17 Shareholder Stewardship in India
- 18 Institutional Investors in China
- 19 Stewardship and Collective Action
- 20 Stewardship Principles in Canada
- 21 The Uncertain Stewardship Potential of Index Funds
- 22 Encouraging Sustainable Investment in South Africa
- 23 Stewardship in Kenya
- 24 The Brazilian Stewardship Framework
- Part III Comparisons
- Index
11 - Korea’s Stewardship Code and the Rise of Shareholder Activism
Agency Problems and Government Stewardship Revealed
from Part II - Jurisdictions
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 April 2022
- Endorsements
- Global Shareholder Stewardship
- Global Shareholder Stewardship
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Part I Foundations
- Part II Jurisdictions
- 4 Shareholder Stewardship in the Netherlands
- 5 Capitalist Stakeholders
- 6 Institutional Investor Stewardship in Italian Corporate Governance
- 7 The Danish Stewardship Code
- 8 Stewardship Norwegian-Style
- 9 Stewardship and Shareholder Engagement in Germany
- 10 The Japanese Stewardship Code
- 11 Korea’s Stewardship Code and the Rise of Shareholder Activism
- 12 The Assessment of Taiwan’s Shareholder Stewardship Codes
- 13 Stewardship in the Hong Kong International Financial Centre
- 14 Singapore’s Embrace of Shareholder Stewardship
- 15 Institutional Investor Stewardship in Malaysia
- 16 The Thai Institutional Investors Stewardship Code and Its Implementation
- 17 Shareholder Stewardship in India
- 18 Institutional Investors in China
- 19 Stewardship and Collective Action
- 20 Stewardship Principles in Canada
- 21 The Uncertain Stewardship Potential of Index Funds
- 22 Encouraging Sustainable Investment in South Africa
- 23 Stewardship in Kenya
- 24 The Brazilian Stewardship Framework
- Part III Comparisons
- Index
Summary
The Korean Stewardship Code is remarkably similar to the UK Code in terms of language, although it differs significantly in motivation. A major concern in the UK is institutional investorsʼ dormancy in widely held shareholding. Conversely, a primary purpose of stewardship in Korea is to keep controlling shareholders in check, particularly by curbing tunnelling of controlling family members. This chapter elucidates contents, the enforcement mechanism, the features, impacts and implications of stewardship in Korea and its related shareholder activism. A unique feature in Korea is the National Pension Service (NPS), the largest institutional investor in Korea and the worldʼs third largest public pension fund. As a keen advocate of shareholder activism, the NPS acts as a catalyst in spreading stewardship in Korea. However, since it is a quasi-government agency, the concern is that its investee companiesʼ autonomy may be damaged in the name of stewardship. Another concern is that the government may use stewardship as a powerful policy tool to steer the private sector in line with its own socio-political agenda that has less to do with the financial benefits of the NPS’s beneficiaries.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Global Shareholder Stewardship , pp. 239 - 260Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
- 1
- Cited by