Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-669899f699-vbsjw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-01T23:25:47.655Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - The (De)Democratizing Tango: Why It’s Hard to Get Democracy to Stick in Southeast Asia

from Part I - Institutional Dimensions of Democratic Backsliding and Resilience

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2025

Valerie J. Bunce
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Thomas B. Pepinsky
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Rachel Beatty Riedl
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Kenneth M. Roberts
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Get access

Summary

Southeast Asia seems locked endlessly in a boom-and-bust cycle of democratizing, then regressing, then democratizing again. This review of the history of democracy and autocracy in Southeast Asia underscores three themes. First, Southeast Asia reminds us that support for democracy is always contingent. The chapter shows how readily factors such as political polarization and the failure of democracy to deliver on its promises can produce receptive audiences, if not full-on partners, for aspiring autocrats. Second, the chapter explore the ways in which institutions can keep autocratic sympathizers in the wings or in the game, and how institutional reforms, particularly those that seek greater political openness and broader empowerment, can, under some circumstances, stoke political divisions and provide fodder for these reactionary forces. Importantly, the chapter suggests, formal liberalization may elevate antidemocratic impulses, in ways that should by now be anticipated (by scholars, democracy promoters, policymakers). Finally, it is noted how seldom pro-democracy forces, even when present and active, command center-stage – though when they do, their influence can be powerful.

Type
Chapter
Information
Global Challenges to Democracy
Comparative Perspectives on Backsliding, Autocracy, and Resilience
, pp. 54 - 70
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Aspinall, Edward. 2010. “Indonesia: The Irony of Success.” Journal of Democracy 21 (2): 2034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aspinall, Edward, Weiss, Meredith L., Hicken, Allen, and Hutchcroft, Paul. 2022. Mobilizing for Elections: Patronage and Political Machines in Southeast Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michael, Bernhard, Hicken, Allen, Reenock, Christopher, and Lindberg, Staffan I.. 2020. “Parties, Civil Society, and the Deterrence of Democratic Defection.” Studies in Comparative International Development 55 (1): 126.Google Scholar
Chua, Beng-Huat. 1995. Communitarian Ideology and Democracy in Singapore. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Drutman, Lee. 2020. Breaking the Two-party Doom Loop: The Case for Multiparty Democracy in America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dryzek, John S. 1996. “Political Inclusion and the Dynamics of Democratization.” American Political Science Review 90 (1): 475–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fealy, Greg. 2020. “Jokowi’s Repressive Pluralism.” East Asia Forum, 27 September, www.eastasiaforum.org/2020/09/27/jokowis-repressive-pluralism/.Google Scholar
Fox, Colm. 2020. “Why Have Candidates in Indonesian Elections Increasingly Been Rallying Ethnic and Religious Support?” The Conversation, 30 September, https://tinyurl.com/yc5ud9uz.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy. 2000. “Rethinking Recognition.” New Left Review 3 (May/June): 107–20.Google Scholar
Gainsborough, Martin. 2002. “Political Change in Vietnam: In Search of the Middle-class Challenge to the State.” Asian Survey 42 (5): 694707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geddes, Barbara. 1999. “What Do We Know about Democratization after Twenty Years?Annual Review of Political Science 2:115–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadiz, Vedi R. 2003. “Reorganizing Political Power in Indonesia: A Reconsideration of So-called ‘Democratic Transitions.’” Pacific Review 16 (4): 591611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicken, Allen. 2013. “Late to the Party: The Development of Partisanship in Thailand.” Trans: National and Regional Studies of Southeast Asia 1 (2): 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicken, Allen 2016. “Thailand’s Containment Constitution.” New Mandala. April 28.Google Scholar
Linz, Juan J., and Stepan, Alfred. 1996. Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-communist Europe. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorch, Jasmin. 2017. “State Weakness and Civil Society in the Philippines.” In Civil Society and Mirror Images of Weak States, pp. 133–97. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loxton, James. 2015Authoritarian Successor Parties.” Journal of Democracy 26 (3): 157–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maravilla, Gladys Ann R. and Hession Grayman, Jesse. 2020. “Understanding Participatory Budgeting through Formal and Informal Processes of Inclusion: A Case Study in the Philippines.” Development in Practice 30 (4): 448–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mietzner, Marcus. 2020. “Authoritarian Innovations in Indonesia: Electoral Narrowing, Identity Politics and Executive Illiberalism.” Democratization 27 (6): 1021–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mietzner, Marcus 2021. “Sources of Resistance to Democratic Decline: Indonesian Civil Society and Its Trials.” Democratization 18 (1): 161–78.Google Scholar
Nugroho, Johannes. 2019. “Why Identity Politics in Indonesia Is Here to Stay.” Today, 6 May, www.todayonline.com/commentary/why-identity-politics-indonesia-here-stay.Google Scholar
Oxhorn, Philip. 1994. “Where Did All the Protesters Go? Popular Mobilization and the Transition to Democracy in Chile.” Latin American Perspectives 82 (21): 4968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pepinsky, Thomas. 2017. “Southeast Asia: Voting against Disorder.” Journal of Democracy 28 (2): 120–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riedl, Rachel Beatty. 2014. Authoritarian Origins of Democratic Party Systems in Africa. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodan, Garry. 2018. Participation without Democracy: Containing Conflict in Southeast Asia. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, Megan and Self, Darin Sanders. 2021. “Myanmar’s Military Distrusts the Country’s Ruling Party: That’s Why It Staged a Coup and Detained Leaders and Activists.” Washington Post, February 2.Google Scholar
Self, Darin Sanders. 2022. Bounded Democracy: How Authoritarian Civilian-military Relations Shape Democratization and Democratic Development. PhD dissertation, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Slater, Dan and Wong, Joseph. 2022. From Development to Democracy: The Transformations of Modern Asia. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Svolik, Milan W. 2019. “Polarization versus Democracy.” Journal of Democracy 30 (3): 2032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney. 1998. Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomsa, Dirk, and Setijadi, Charlotte. 2018. “New Forms of Political Activism in Indonesia.” Asian Survey 58 (3): 557–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valenzuela, J. Samuel. 1990. Democratic Consolidation in Post-transitional Settings: Notion, Process, and Facilitating Conditions. Working paper #150. Helen Kellogg Institute for International Studies, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN.Google Scholar
Weiss, Meredith L. 2006. Protest and Possibilities: Civil Society and Coalitions for Political Change in Malaysia. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Weiss, Meredith L. 2007. “What a Little Democracy Can Do: Trajectories of Reform in Malaysia and Indonesia.” Democratization 14 (1): 2643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, Meredith L. 2020. “The Limits of ‘Populism’: How Malaysia Misses the Mark and Why That Matters.” Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs 39 (2): 207–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, Meredith L. and Hansson, Eva. 2023. “Civil Society in Politics and Southeast Asia in Civil Society.” In Hansson, Eva and Weiss, Meredith L., ed. Routledge Handbook of Civil and Uncivil Society in Southeast Asia, pp. 122. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×