Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T06:37:55.916Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

APPENDIX 4.2 - RATING AGENCY METHODOLOGIES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 January 2010

Layna Mosley
Affiliation:
University of Notre Dame, Indiana
Get access

Summary

Euromoney

Method: Euromoney surveys economists and political analysts for their views on the creditworthiness of 179 countries. These survey results are combined with quantitative indicators to produce “a sensitive measure of the riskiness of investing in these economies.” Scores range from 0 to 100.

Indicators

  1. Economic data (25%): Based on global economic projections for current and future year performance, as forecasted by 20 economists at leading financial institutions.

  2. Political risk (25%): Risk analysts, risk insurance brokers, and bank credit officers rate countries, with a perfect score for “no risk of nonpayment” and a zero score for “no chance of payment being made.”

  3. Debt indicators (10%): Calculated by using data from the World Bank World Debt Tables for the previous year. Indicators include the ratio of debt service to exports, the current account balance as a percentage of GDP, and the ratio of external debt to GDP.

  4. Debt in default or rescheduled (10%): Based on the amount of debt in default or rescheduled during the last three years.

  5. Credit ratings (10%): The average of sovereign ratings from IBCA, Moody's, and Standard and Poor's.

  6. Access to bank finance (5%): Calculated from disbursements of private, long-term, unguaranteed loans as a percentage of GDP.

  7. Access to short-term finance (5%): Scores calculated by taking coverage available from U.S. Export–Import Bank, NCM UK, ECGD, and membership of OECD consensus groups.

  8. Access to international bond and syndicated loan markets (5%): Euromoney's estimation of how easily a country might access the markets now.

  9. Access to and discount on forfaiting (5%): Reflects the average maximal tenor available and the forfaiting spread over “riskless” countries such as the United States.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • RATING AGENCY METHODOLOGIES
  • Layna Mosley, University of Notre Dame, Indiana
  • Book: Global Capital and National Governments
  • Online publication: 14 January 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615672.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • RATING AGENCY METHODOLOGIES
  • Layna Mosley, University of Notre Dame, Indiana
  • Book: Global Capital and National Governments
  • Online publication: 14 January 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615672.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • RATING AGENCY METHODOLOGIES
  • Layna Mosley, University of Notre Dame, Indiana
  • Book: Global Capital and National Governments
  • Online publication: 14 January 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615672.013
Available formats
×