Book contents
- The Gifted Language Learner
- The Gifted Language Learner
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Tables
- Introduction
- 1 Giftedness, Then and Now
- 2 The Gifted Language Learner
- 3 Personality Dimensions in GLL
- 4 Neurological and Cognitive Foundations of GLL
- 5 Emotion, Cognition, and Engagement in GLL
- 6 Paths Forward in Theory and Research
- References
- Index
- References
References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 June 2021
Book contents
- The Gifted Language Learner
- The Gifted Language Learner
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Tables
- Introduction
- 1 Giftedness, Then and Now
- 2 The Gifted Language Learner
- 3 Personality Dimensions in GLL
- 4 Neurological and Cognitive Foundations of GLL
- 5 Emotion, Cognition, and Engagement in GLL
- 6 Paths Forward in Theory and Research
- References
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Gifted Language LearnerA Case of Nature or Nurture?, pp. 155 - 195Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Abrahamsson, N. (2012). Age of onset and nativelike L2 ultimate attainment of morphosyntactic and phonetic intuition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34, 187–214.Google Scholar
Abrahamsson, N. and Hyltenstam, K. (2009). Age of onset and nativelikeness in a second language: Listener perception versus linguistic scrutiny. Language Learning, 59(2), 249–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ackerman, P. (2003). Aptitude complexes and trait complexes. Educational Psychologist, 38(2), 85–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, A. and Gathercole, S. (1996). Phonological working memory and spoken language development in young children. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49, 216–233.Google Scholar
Ajzen, I. (2005). Attitudes, personality and behavior. 2nd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Open University Press.Google Scholar
Allport, G. (1931, 2010). What is a trait of personality? Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 25(4), 368–372. Reprinted in D. Funder and D. Ozer (eds.), Pieces of the personality puzzle: Readings in theory and research (pp. 56–59). New York, NY: W. W. Norton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages (2012). ACTFL Proficiency Guidelines. www.actfl.org/sites/default/files/pdfs/public/ACTFLProficiencyGuidelines2012_FINAL.pdfGoogle Scholar
Andreasen, N. and Ramchandran, K. (2016). The neuroscience of creative genius. In Simonton, D. (ed.), The Wiley handbook of genius (pp. 109–119). Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ang, S., Van Dyne, L., Koh, C., Ng, K., Templer, K., Tay, C. and Chandrasekar, N. (2007). Cultural intelligence: Its measurements and effects on cultural judgment and decision-making, cultural adaptation and task performance. Management and Organization Review, 3, 335–371.Google Scholar
Arnold, J. and Brown, H. D. (1999). A map of the terrain. In Arnold, J. (ed.), Affect in language learning (pp. 1–24). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Artieda, G. and Muñoz, C. (2016). The LLAMA tests and the underlying structure of language aptitude at two levels of foreign language proficiency. Learning and Individual Differences, 50, 42–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arvidsson, K., Eyckmans, J., Rosiers, A. and Forsberg Lundell, F. (2018). Self-perceived linguistic progress, target language use and personality development during study abroad. Study Abroad Research in Second Language Acquisition and International Education, 3, 144–166.Google Scholar
Asendorpf, J. (2009). Personality: Traits and situations. In Corr, P. and Matthews, G. (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personality psychology (pp. 43–71). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ashby, F., Isen, A. and Turken, A. (1999). A neuropsychological theory of positive affect and its influence on cognition. Psychological Review, 106, 529–550.Google Scholar
Ashton, M. and Lee, K. (2001). A theoretical basis for the major dimensions of personality. European Journal of Personality, 15, 327–353.Google Scholar
Atkinson, D. (2010). Sociocognition: What it can mean for second language acquistion. In Batstone, R. (ed.), Sociocognitive perspectives on language use and language learning (pp. 24–39). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Augustine, A., Larsen, R. and Lee, H. (2013). Affective personality traits and cognition. In Robinson, M., Watkins, E. and Harmon-Jones, E. (eds.), Handbook of cognition and emotion (pp. 312–328). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Bachman, L. and Palmer, A. (1996). Language testing in practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baddeley, A. (2007). Working memory, thought and action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baddeley, A. and Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. In Bower, G. (ed.), Recent advances in learning and motivation (pp. 47–89). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Baddeley, A. and Hitch, G. (2019). The phonological loop as a buffer store: An update. Cortex, 112, 91–106.Google Scholar
Bagheri, L. and Milyavskaya, M. (2020). Novelty–variety as a candidate basic psychological need: New evidence across three studies. Motivation and Emotion, 44(1), 32–53. DOI: 10.1007/s11031-019-09807-4Google Scholar
Baker-Smemoe, W. and Haslam, N. (2013). The effect of language learning aptitude, strategy use and learning context on L2 pronunciation learning. Applied Linguistics, 34, 435–456.Google Scholar
Baker-Smemoe, W., Dewey, D., Bown, J. and Martinsen, R. (2014). Variables affecting L2 gains during study abroad. Foreign Language Annals, 47(3), 464–486. DOI: 10.1111/flan.12093Google Scholar
Banai, K. and Ahissar, M. (2005). Psychoacoustics and working memory in dyslexia. In Syka, J. and Merzenich, M. (eds.), Plasticity and signal representation in the auditory system (pp. 233–242). New York, NY: Springer Science+Business Media.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Bandura, A., Davidson, J. and Davidson Films (directors) and Davidson, H. (producer). (2003). Bandura’s social cognitive theory: An introduction [Video file]. Retrieved June 21, 2019, from Education in Video, United States.Google Scholar
, M. and Caccamise, D. (2010). Generalization of knowledge: Multidisciplinary perspectives. New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Baran-Łucarz, M. (2012a). Individual learner differences and accuracy in foreign language pronunciation. In Pawlak, M. (ed.), New perspectives on individual differences in language learning and teaching (pp. 289–303). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
Baran-Łucarz, M. (2012b). Ego boundaries and attainments in FL pronunciation. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 2(1), 45–45. DOI: 10.14746/ssllt.2012.2.1.3Google Scholar
Bardel, C. (2016). The lexicon of advanced L2 learners. In Hyltenstam, K. (ed.), Advanced proficiency and exceptional ability in second languages (pp. 73–109). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K. and Bastos, M. (2011). Proficiency, length of stay, and intensity of interaction, and the acquisition of conventional expressions in L2 pragmatics. Intercultural Pragmatics, 8, 347–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, L., Mesquita, B. and Smith, E. (2010). The context principle. In Mesquita, B., Barrett, L. and Smith, E. (eds.), The mind in context (pp. 1–25). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Barron, A. (2003). Acquisition in interlanguage pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Barsalou, L. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–645. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639Google Scholar
Bartel-Radic, A. and Giannelloni, J-L. (2017). A renewed perspective on the measurement of cross-cultural competence: An approach through personality traits and cross-cultural knowledge. European Management Journal, 35, 632–644.Google Scholar
Bartning, I. (2016). Morphosyntax and discourse in high-level second language use. In Hyltenstam, K. (ed.), Advanced proficiency and exceptional ability in second languages (pp. 43–71). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Bartning, I., Arvidsson, K. and Forsberg Lundell, F. (2015). Complexity at the phrasal level in spoken L1 and very advanced L2 French. Language, Interaction and Acquisition, 6, 181–201.Google Scholar
Batstone, R. (2010). Sociocognitive perspectives on language use and language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Belnap, R-K., Bown, J., Dewey, D., Belnap, L. and Steffen, P. (2016). Project perseverance: Helping students become self-regulating learners. In MacIntyre, P., Gregersen, T. and Mercer, S. (eds.), Positive psychology in SLA (pp. 282–301). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Benet-Martínez, V. and Haritatos, J. (2005). Bicultural identity integration (BII): Components and psychosocial antecedents. Journal of Personality, 73(4), 1015–1049.Google Scholar
Benson, P. (2017). Ways of seeing: The individual and the social in applied linguistics research methodologies. Language Teaching, 52, 60–70.Google Scholar
Berridge, K. and Robinson, T. (2003). Parsing reward. Trends in Neurosciences, 26(9), 507–513.Google Scholar
Bever, T. and Chiarello, R. (1974). Cerebral dominance in musicians and non-musicians. Science, 185, 537–539.Google Scholar
Bialystok, E. and Barac, R. (2013). Cognitive effects. In Grosjean, F. and Li, P. (eds.), The psycholinguistics of bilingualism (pp. 192–213). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bialystok, E., Martin, M. and Viswanathan, M. (2005). Bilingualism across the lifespan: The rise and fall of inhibitory control. The International Journal of Bilingualism, 9, 103–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biedroń, A. (2010). Personality factors according to the Five Factor Model in gifted foreign language learners. In Perez-Bustamante, G., Phusavat, K. and Ferreira, F. (eds.), Proceedings of the IASK International Conference Teaching and Learning 2010, Seville, Spain, 29 November – 01 December 2010 (pp. 148–154). International Association for Scientific Knowledge.Google Scholar
Biedroń, A. (2011a). Near-nativeness as a function of cognitive and personality factors: Three case studies of highly able foreign language learners. In Pawlak, M., Waniek-Klimczak, E., and Majer, J. (eds.), Speaking and instructed foreign language acquisition (p. 99–116). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biedroń, A. (2011b). Personality factors as predictors of foreign language aptitude. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 1, 467–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biedroń, A. (2015). Neurology of foreign language aptitude. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 5, 13–40.Google Scholar
Biedroń, A. and Pawlak, M. (2016a). New conceptualizations of linguistic giftedness. Language Teaching, 49, 151–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biedroń, A. and Pawlak, M. (2016b). The interface between research on individual difference variables and teaching practice: The case of cognitive factors and personality. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 6(3), 395–422. DOI: 10.14746/sllt.2016.6.3.3Google Scholar
Biedroń, A. and Szczepaniak, A. (2012). Working memory and short-term memory abilities in accomplished multilinguals. Modern Language Journal, 96(2), 290–306. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2012.01332.xGoogle Scholar
Bijvoet, E. and Fraurud, K. (2012). Studying high-level (L1-L2) development and use among young people in multilingual Stockholm. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34, 291–319.Google Scholar
Bilalić, M., McLeod, P. and Gobet, F. (2008). Inflexibility of experts – reality or myth? Quantifying the Einstellung effect in chess masters. Cognitive Psychology, 56(2), 73–102. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2007.02.001Google Scholar
Birdsong, D. (1992). Ultimate attainment in second language acquisition. Language, 68, 706–755.Google Scholar
Birdsong, D. (2005, March). On the limits of attainment in late L2A. Presentation to Georgetown University Roundtable on Languages and Linguistics at Georgetown University, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Birdsong, D. (2018, March). Plasticity, variability and age in second language acquisition and bilingualism. Frontiers in Psychology, 9: Article 81. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00081 www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00081/fullGoogle Scholar
Birdsong, D. and Gertken, L. (2013). In faint praise of folly. A critical review of native/non-native speaker comparisons, with examples from native and bilingual processing of French complex syntax. Language, Interaction and Acquisition, 4, 107–133.Google Scholar
Birdsong, D. and Molis, M. (2001). On the evidence for maturational effects in second language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 235–249.Google Scholar
Blair, C. and Ursache, A. (2011). A bidirectional model of executive functions and self-regulation. In Vohs, K. and Baumeister, R. (eds.), Handbook of self-regulation. Research, theory and applications (pp. 300–320). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Blanchette, I. and Richards, A. (2010). The influence of affect on higher level cognition: A review of research on interpretation, judgment, decision making and reasoning. In DeHouwer, J. and Hermans, D. (eds.), Cognition and emotion. Reviews of current research and theories (pp. 276–324). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Bley-Vroman, R. (1989). What is the logical problem of foreign language learning? In S. Gass, J. Schachter, (eds.), Linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition (pp. 41–68). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Blickle, G. (1996). Personality traits, learning strategies and performance. European Journal of Personality, 10, 337–352.Google Scholar
Block, J. (1995). A contrarian view of the Five-Factor approach to personality description. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 187–215.Google Scholar
Bolitho, R., Carter, R., Hughes, R., Ivanic, R., Masuhara, H. and Tomlinson, B. (2003). Ten questions about language awareness. ELT Journal, 57, 251–259.Google Scholar
Bongaerts, T., Planken, B. and Schils, E. (1995). Can late starters attain a native accent in a foreign language? A test of the critical period hypothesis. In Singleton, D. and Lengyel, Z. (eds.), The age factor in second language acquisition (pp. 30–50). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Bongaerts, T., Summeren, C., Planken, B. and Schils, E. (1997). Age and ultimate attainment in the production of foreign language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 447–465.Google Scholar
Borland, J. (2005). Gifted education without gifted children. In Sternberg, R. and Davidson, J. (eds.), Conceptions of giftedness. 2nd ed. (pp. 1–19). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bornstein, M. and Bradley, R. (2003). Socioeconomic status, parenting, and child development. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Boudreau, C., MacIntyre, P. and Dewaele, J-M. (2018). Enjoyment and anxiety in second language communication: An idiodynamic approach. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 8, 149–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bownds, M-D. (1999). The biology of mind. Origins and structures of mind, brain and consciousness. Bethesda, MD: Fitzgerald Science.Google Scholar
Breckler, S. and Greenwald, A. (1986). Motivational facets of the self. In Sorrentino, R. and Higgins, E. (eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition. Foundations of social behavior (pp. 145–164). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Brewer, M. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 475–482.Google Scholar
Brito, N. and Barr, R. (2012). Influence of bilingualism on memory generalization during infancy. Developmental Science, 15(6), 812–816. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2012.1184.xGoogle Scholar
Brody, L. and Stanley, J. (2005). Youths who reason exceptionally well mathematically and/or verbally: Using the MVT:D4 model to develop their talents. In Sternberg, R. and Davidson, J. (eds.), Conceptions of giftedness. 2nd ed. (pp. 20–37). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, H. D. (2014). Principles of language learning and teaching. 5th ed. White Plains, NY: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Brown, P., Roediger, H. and McDaniel, M. (2014). Make it stick. The science of successful learning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Buchsbaum, B. and D’Esposito, M. (2018). A sensorimotor view of verbal working memory. Cortex, 112, 134–148.Google Scholar
Busch, D. (1982). Introversion-extroversion and the EFL proficiency of Japanese students. Language Learning, 32, 109–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canli, T. (2004). Functional brain mapping of extraversion and neuroticism: Learning from individual differences in emotion processing. Journal of Personality, 72, 1105–1132.Google Scholar
Canli, T. (2009). Neuroimaging of personality. In Corr, P. and Matthews, G. (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personality psychology (pp. 305–322). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cao, Y. (2014). A sociocognitive perspective on second language classroom willingness to communicate. TESOL Quarterly, 48, 789–814.Google Scholar
Caprara, G. and Cervone, D. (2003). A conception of personality for a psychology of human strengths: Personality as an agentic, self-regulating system. In Aspinwall, L. and Staudinger, U. (eds.), A psychology of human strengths. Fundamental questions and future directions for a positive psychology (pp. 61–74). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Carlson, S. (2003). Executive function in contexts: Development, measurement, theory and experience. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 68, 138–151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carroll, J. (1973). Implications of aptitude test research and psycholinguistic theory for foreign language teaching. International Journal of Psycholinguistics, 2, 5–14.Google Scholar
Carroll, J. and Sapon, S. (1959). Modern Language Aptitude Test. New York, NY: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carver, C. and Scheier, M. (2009). Self-regulation and control in personality functioning. In Corr, P. and Matthews, G. (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personality psychology (pp. 427–440). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carver, C. and Scheier, M. (2013). Goals and emotion. In Robinson, M., Watkins, E. and Harmon-Jones, E. (eds.), Handbook of cognition and emotion (pp. 176–194). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Carver, C. and White, T. (1994). Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 319–333.Google Scholar
Caspi, A. and Shiner, R. (2006). Personality development. In Damon, W. and Lerner, R. (Series eds.) and Eisenberg, N. (Vol. ed.), Handbook of child psychology, Vol. 3: Social, emotional, and personality development. 6th ed. (pp. 300–365). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Caspi, A., Roberts, B. and Shiner, R. (2005). Personality development: Stability and change. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 453–84.Google Scholar
Castellano, J. (2002). Renavigating the waters. The identification and assessment of culturally and linguistically diverse students for gifted and talented education. In Castellano, J. and Diaz, E. (eds.), Reaching new horizons: Gifted and talented education for culturally and linguistically diverse students (pp. 94–116). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Cattell, H. and Mead, A. (2008). The Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire (16PF). In Matthews, G. and Boyle, G. (eds.), The SAGE handbook of personality theory and assessment. Vol 2: Personality measurement and testing (pp. 135–159). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Cervone, D., Shadel, W. and Jencius, S. (2001). Social-cognitive theory of personality assessment. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 33–51.Google Scholar
Chee, M., Soon, C., Lee, H. and Pallier, C. (2004). Left insula activation: A marker for language attainment in bilinguals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101(42), 15265–15270.Google Scholar
Chen, C., Fiecas, M., Gutiérrez, E., Panizzon, M., Eyler, L., Vuoksimaa, E., … Kremen, W. (2013). Genetic topography of brain morphology. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), 110 (42), 17089–17094. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1308091110CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, G. and Starosta, W. (2000). The development and validation of the Intercultural Communication Sensitivity Scale. Human Communication, 3, 1–15.Google Scholar
Chen, J. and Gardner, H. (1997). Alternative assessment from a Multiple Intelligences theoretical perspective. In Flanagan, D., Genshaft, J. and Harrison, P. (eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment. Theories, tests, and issues (pp. 105–121). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Christiner, M. and Reiterer, S. (2013). Song and speech: Examining the link between singing talent and speech imitation ability. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1–11. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00874Google Scholar
Cohn, M. and Fredrickson, B. (2009). Positive emotions. In Lopez, S. and Snyder, C. (eds.), The Oxford handbook of positive psychology (pp. 13–24). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Conway, A., Jarrold, C., Kane, M., Miyake, A. and Towse, J. (eds.) (2007) Variation in working memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cook, V. (1999). Going beyond the native speaker in language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 33, 185–209.Google Scholar
Cook, V. (2010). The relationship between first and second language acquisition revisited. In Macaro, E. (ed.), Continuum companion to second language acquisition (pp. 137–157). New York: Continuum International.Google Scholar
Cooper, C. (2010). Individual differences and personality. New York, NY: Hodder Education/Routledge.Google Scholar
Coppieters, R. (1987). Competence differences between native and near-native speakers. Language, 63, 544–573.Google Scholar
Costa, P. and McCrae, R. (1976). Age differences in personality structure: A cluster-analytic approach. Journal of Gerontology, 31, 564–570.Google Scholar
Costa, P. and McCrae, R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
Costa, P. and McCrae, R. (1995). Domains and facets: Hierarchical personality assessment using the revised NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 64, 21–50.Google Scholar
Council of Europe. (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. www.coe.int/en/web/common-european-framework-reference-languages/Google Scholar
Coventry, W., Antón-Méndez, I., Willis, W., Levison, C., Byrne, B., van Daal, V. and Ellis, N. (2012). The etiology of individual differences in second language acquisition in Australian school students: A behavior-genetic study. Language Learning, 62, 880–901.Google Scholar
Cox, C. (1926). The early mental traits of three hundred geniuses. Stanford: CA: University Press.Google Scholar
Crain, W. (2000). Theories of development. 4th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Crookes, G. and Schmidt, R. (1991). Motivation: Reopening the research agenda. Language Learning, 41, 469–512.Google Scholar
Cross, T. and Coleman, L. (2005). School-based conception of giftedness. In Sternberg, R. and Davidson, J. (eds.), Conceptions of giftedness. 2nd ed. (pp. 52–63). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Crystal, D. (1999). A dictionary of language. 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Crystal, D. (2003). A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Csépe, V. (2017). The multilingual brain: Implications for the future. In Pfenninger, S. and Navracsics, J. (eds.), Future research directions for applied linguistics (pp. 33–52). Bristol: Multilingual Matters, Ltd.Google Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1998). Fruitless polarities. Behavioral and Brain Science, 21, p. 411.Google Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2016). The Systems Model of creativity and its applications. In Simonton, D. (ed.), The Wiley handbook of genius (pp. 533–545). Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Csizér, K. and Kormos, J. (2009). Learning experiences, selves and motivated learning behavior: A comparative analysis of structural models for Hungarian secondary and university learners of English. In Dörnyei, Z. and Ushioda, E. (eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 98–119). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Csizér, K. and Kormos, J. (2014). The ideal L2 self, self-regulatory strategies and autonomous learning: A comparison of different groups of English language learners. In Csizér, K. and Magid, M. (eds.), The impact of self-concept on language learning (pp. 73–86). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Cummins, J. (1979). Cognitive/academic language proficiency, linguistic interdependence, the optimal age question, and some other matters. Working Papers on Bilingualism, 19, 197–205.Google Scholar
Cutler, C. (2014). Accentedness, “passing” and crossing. In Levis, J. and Moyer, A. (eds.), Social dynamics in second language accent (pp. 145–167). Boston, MA: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Dahling, J. and Ruppel, C. (2016). Learning goal orientation buffers the effects of negative normative feedback on test self-efficacy and reattempt interest. Learning and Individual Differences, 50, 296–301.Google Scholar
Dale, P., Harlaar, N. and Plomin, R. (2012). Nature and nurture in school-based second language achievement. Language Learning, 62, 28–48. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00705.xGoogle Scholar
Damasio, A. (1994). Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York, NY: Putnam.Google Scholar
Damasio, A. (1999). The feeling of what happens: Body and emotion in the making of consciousness. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Damian, R. and Simonton, D. (2016). Diversifying experiences in the development of genius and their impact on creative cognition. In Simonton, D. (ed.), The Wiley handbook of genius (pp. 375–393). Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. (1871). The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Davidson, J. (2009). Contemporary models of giftedness. In Shavinina, L. and Ferrari, M. (eds.), Beyond knowledge. Extracognitive aspects of developing high ability (pp. 81–97). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Davies, A. (2003). The native speaker: Myth and reality. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Davies, A. (2015). Commentary on the native speaker status in pronunciation research. In Isaacs, T. and Trofimovich, P. (eds.), Second language pronunciation assessment (pp. 185–192). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Davis, G. (2009). New developments in gifted education. In Shavinina, L. (ed.), International handbook on giftedness (pp. 1035–1044). New York, NY: Springer Science+Business Media.Google Scholar
De Cock, S. (2004). Preferred sequences of words in NS and NNS speech. BELL: Belgian Journal of English Language and Literatures. New Series, 2, 225–246.Google Scholar
De Diego-Balaguer, R. and Lopez-Barroso, D. (2010). Cognitive and neural mechanisms sustaining rule learning from speech. Language Learning, 60, 151–187. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00605.xGoogle Scholar
De Raad, B. (2009). Structural models of personality. In Corr, P. and Matthews, G. (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personality psychology (pp. 127–147). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
De Raad, B. and Perugini, M. (2003). Big five model assessment. In Fernandez-Ballesteros, R., Encyclopedia of psychological assessment (pp. 138–144). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
De Raad, B. and Schouwenberg, H. (1996). Personality in learning and education: A review. European Journal of Personality, 10, 303–336. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099–0984(199612)10:5<303::AID-PER262>3.0.CO;2–2Google Scholar
De Vignemont, F. and Singer, T. (2006). The empathic brain: How, when and why? Trends in Cognitive Science, 10, 435–441.Google Scholar
Deary, I. (2009). The trait approach to personality. In Corr, P. and Matthews, G. (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personality psychology (pp. 89–109). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Deci, E. and Ryan, R. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Deci, E. and Ryan, R. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. DOI: 10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01Google Scholar
DeHouwer, J. and Hermans, D. (2010). Do feelings have a mind of their own? In DeHouwer, J. and Hermans, D. (eds.), Cognition and emotion. Reviews of current research and theories (pp. 38–65). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Del Maschio, N., Fedeli, D., Sulpizio, S. and Abutalebi, J. (2019). The relationship between bilingual experience and gyrification in adulthood: A cross-sectional surface-based morphometry study. Brain and Language, Article 104680, 1–10.Google Scholar
Demo, D. (1992). The self-concept over time: Research issues and directions. Annual Review of Sociology, 18, 303–326.Google Scholar
Derwing, T., Munro, M. and Thomson, R. (2007). A longitudinal study of ESL learners’ fluency and comprehensibility development. Applied Linguistics, 29, 359–380.Google Scholar
Detterman, D. (1993). Giftedness and intelligence: One and the same? In Bock, G. and Ackrill, K. (eds.), The origins and development of high ability. A Wiley-Interscience Publication. Ciba Foundation Symposium 178 (p. 22–43). West Sussex: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Dewaele, J-M. (2005). Investigating the psychological and emotional dimensions in instructed language learning: Obstacles and possibilities. Modern Language Journal, 89, 367–380.Google Scholar
Dewaele, J-M. (2010). Emotions in multiple languages. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Dewaele, J-M. (2015). On emotions in foreign language learning and use. The Language Teacher, 39, 13–15.Google Scholar
Dewaele, J-M. and Furnham, A. (1999). Extraversion: The unloved variable in applied linguistic research. Language Learning, 49, 509–544.Google Scholar
Dewaele, J-M. and Furnham, A. (2000). Personality and speech production: A pilot study of second language learners. Personality and Individual Differences, 28, 355–365. DOI: 10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00106-3Google Scholar
Dewaele, J-M. and MacIntyre, P. D. (2016). Foreign language enjoyment and foreign language classroom anxiety: The right and left feet of FL learning? In MacIntyre, P., Gregersen, T., and Mercer, S. (eds.), Positive psychology in SLA (pp. 215–236). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Dewaele, J-M. and McCloskey, J. (2015). Attitudes toward foreign accents among adult multilingual language users. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 36, 221–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewaele, J-M. and Stavans, A. (2014). The effect of immigration, acculturation and multicompetence on personality profiles of Israeli multilinguals. International Journal of Bilingualism, 18(3), 203–221. DOI: 10.1177/1367006912439941Google Scholar
Dewaele, J-M. and Van Oudenhoven, J-P. (2009). The effect of multilingualism/multiculturalism on personality: No gain without pain for Third Culture kids? International Journal of Multilingualism, 6, 443–459.Google Scholar
Dewaele, J-M. and Wei, L. (2012). Multilingualism, empathy and multicompetence. International Journal of Multilingualism, 9, 352–366.Google Scholar
Dewaele, J-M. and Zeckel, I. (2016). The psychological and linguistic profiles of self-reported code-switchers. International Journal of Bilingualism, 20, 594–610.Google Scholar
Dewaele, J-M., Petrides, K. and Furnham, A. (2008). Effects of trait emotional intelligence and sociobiographical variables on communicative anxiety and foreign language anxiety among adult multilinguals: A review and empirical investigation. Language Learning, 58, 911–960.Google Scholar
Dewaele, J-M., Witney, J., Saito, K. and Dewaele, L. (2017). Foreign language enjoyment and anxiety: The effect of teacher and learner variables. Language Teaching Research, 22, 676–697.Google Scholar
Dewey, D. (2012, November). Social networks, language use, and language acquisition during study abroad. Presentation at Middle East Studies Association, Denver, CO.Google Scholar
DeYoung, C. and Gray, J. (2009). Personality neuroscience: Explaining individual differences in affect, behavior and cognition. In Corr, P. and Matthews, G. (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personality psychology (pp. 323–346). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
DeYoung, C., Hirsh, J., Shane, M., Papademetris, X., Rajeevan, N. and Gray, R. (2010). Testing predictions from personality neuroscience: Brain structure and the Big Five. Psychological Science, 21, 820–828.Google Scholar
Diaz-Campos, M. (2004). Context of learning in the acquisition of Spanish second language phonology. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 249–273.Google Scholar
Dinsmore, D., Alexander, P. and Loughlin, S. (2008). Focusing the conceptual lens on metacognition, self-regulation, and self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 20(4), 391–409.Google Scholar
Dittinger, E., Scherer, J., Jäncke, L., Besson, M. and Elmer, S. (2019). Testing the influence of musical expertise on novel word learning across the lifespan using a cross-sectional approach in children, young adults and older adults. Brain and Language, Article 104678, 1–15.Google Scholar
Donaldson, B. (2012). Syntax and discourse in near-native French: Clefts and focus. Language Learning, 62, 902–930.Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Z. (2005). Psychology and the language learner. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Z. (2009) The L2 motivational self system. In Dörnyei, Z. and Ushioda, E. (eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 9–42). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Z. (2010). The relationship between language aptitude and language learning motivation: Individual differences from a dynamic systems perspective. In Macaro, E. (ed.), Continuum companion to second language acquisition (pp. 247–267). New York, NY: Continuum International.Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Z. and Ushioda, E. (2009). Motivation, language identity and the L2 self. Buffalo, NY: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Z., Durow, V. and Zahran, K. (2004). Individual differences and their effects on formulaic sequence acquisition. In Schmitt, N. (ed.), Formulaic sequences: Acquisition, processing and use (pp. 87–106). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Doughty, C. (2019). Cognitive language aptitude. Language Learning, 69, 101–126. DOI: 10.1111/lang.12322Google Scholar
Dovidio, J., Pearson, A. and Orr, P. (2008). Social psychology and neuroscience: Strange bedfellows or a healthy marriage? Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 11, 247–263.Google Scholar
Draganski, B. and May, A. (2008). Training-induced structural changes in the adult human brain. Behavioral Brain Research, 192(1), 137–42. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2008.02.015Google Scholar
Draguns, J. (2009). Personality in cross-cultural perspective. In Corr, P. and Matthews, G. (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personality psychology (pp. 556–576). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Drake, J. and Winner, E. (2018). Why deliberate practice is not enough. In Hambrick, D., Campitelli, G. and Macnamara, V. (eds.), The science of expertise. Behavioral, neural and genetic approaches to complex skill (pp. 101–128). New York NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Duckworth, A. (2016). Grit. The power of passion and perseverance. New York, NY: Scribner.Google Scholar
Duckworth, A. and Allred, K. (2012). Temperament in the classroom. In Zentner, M. and Shiner, R. (eds.), Handbook of temperament (pp. 627–644). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Duff, P. and Kobayashi, M. (2010). The intersection of social, cognitive, and cultural processes in language learning: A second language socialization approach. In Batstone, R. (ed.), Sociocognitive perspectives on language use and language learning (pp. 75–93). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dunham, Y. and Banaji, M. (2010). Platonic blindness and the challenge of understanding context. In Mesquita, B., Barrett, L. and Smith, E. (eds.), The mind in context (pp. 201–213). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Dweck, C. (2016). Mindset. The new psychology of success. New York, NY: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
Ebstein, R. (2006). The molecular genetic architecture of personality: Beyond self-report questionnaires. Molecular Psychiatry, 11, 427–445.Google Scholar
Ehrman, M. (1999). Ego boundaries and tolerance of ambiguity. In Arnold, J. (ed.), Affect in language learning (pp. 68–86). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ehrman, M. (2008). Personality and good language learners. In Griffiths, C. (ed.), Lessons from good language learners (pp. 61–72). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ehrman, M. and Oxford, R. (1989). Effects of sex differences, career choice, and psychological type on adult language learning strategies. Modern Language Journal, 73, 1–13.Google Scholar
Ehrman, M. and Oxford, R. (1995). Cognition plus: Correlates of language learning success. Modern Language Journal, 79, 67–89.Google Scholar
Ehrman, M., Leaver, B. and Oxford, R. (2003). A brief overview of individual differences in second language learning. System, 31, 313–330.Google Scholar
Eilam, B., Zeidner, M. and Aharon, I. (2009). Student conscientiousness, self-regulated learning, and science achievement: An explorative field study. Psychology in the Schools, 46, 420–432.Google Scholar
Elliott, A. (1995). Field independence/dependence, hemispheric specialization, and attitude in relation to pronunciation accuracy in Spanish as a foreign language. Modern Language Journal, 79, 356–371.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. and Barkhuizen, G. (2005). Analyzing learner language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ellsworth, P. (1994). Sense, culture and sensibility. In Kitayama, S. and Markus, H. (eds.), Emotion and culture: Empirical studies of mutual influence (pp. 23–50). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10152-001Google Scholar
Emmons, R. (1996). Striving and feeling. Personal goals and subjective well-being. In Gollwitzer, P. and Bargh, J. (eds.), The psychology of action. Linking cognition and motivation to behavior (pp. 313–337). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Erard, M. (2012). Babel no more. The search for the world’s most extraordinary language learners. New York, NY:
Free Press/Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Ericsson, K. and Faivre, I. (1988). What’s exceptional about exceptional abilities? In Obler, L. and Fein, D. (eds.), The exceptional brain: Neuropsychology of talent and special abilities (pp. 436–473). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Ericsson, K. Nandagopal, K. and Roring, R. (2009). An expert performance approach to the study of giftedness. In Shavinina, L. (ed.), International handbook on giftedness (pp. 129–153). New York, NY: Springer Science+Business Media.Google Scholar
Erikson, M. (2007). The meaning of the future: Toward a more specific definition of possible selves. Review of General Psychology, 11(4), 348–358.Google Scholar
Erman, B., Forsberg Lundell, F. and Lewis, M. (2016). Formulaic language in advanced second language acquisition and use. In Hyltenstam, K. (ed.), Advanced proficiency and exceptional ability in second languages (pp. 111–147). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. (1967). The biological basis of personality. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas Publishers.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. and Eysenck, S. (1964). Manual of the Eysenck Personality Inventory. London: University of London Press.Google Scholar
Falout, J. (2016). The dynamics of past selves in language learning and well-being. In MacIntyre, P., Gregersen, T. and Mercer, S. (eds.), Positive psychology in SLA (pp. 112–129). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Fanselow, M. and Poulos, A. (2005). The neuroscience of mammalian associative learning. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 207–234. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070213.Google Scholar
Fant, L. (2016). Pragmatic markers in high-level second language use. In Hyltenstam, K. (ed.), Advanced proficiency and exceptional ability in second languages (pp. 15–42). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Fein, D. and Obler, L. (1988). Neuropsychological study of talent: A developing field. In Obler, L. and Fein, D. (ed.), The exceptional brain: The neuropsychology of talent and special abilities (pp. 3–15). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Feist, G. (2016). Psychometric studies of scientific talent and eminence. In Simonton, D. (ed.), The Wiley handbook of genius (pp. 62–86). Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Feldhusen, J. (2005). Giftedness, talent, expertise, and creative achievement. In Sternberg, R. and Davidson, J. (eds.), Conceptions of giftedness. 2nd ed. (pp. 64–79). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fleeson, W. and Jolley, S. (2006). A proposed theory of the adult development of intraindividual variability in trait-manifesting behavior. In Mroczek, D. and Little, T. (eds.), Handbook of personality development (pp. 41–59). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Flege, J. and Liu, S. (2001). The effect of experience on adults’ acquisition of a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23, 527–552.Google Scholar
Flege, J., Birdsong, D., Bialystok, E., Mack, M., Sung, H. and Tsukada, K. (2006). Degree of foreign accent in English sentences produced by Korean children and adults. Journal of Phonetics, 34, 153–175.Google Scholar
Flege, J., MacKay, I. and Piske, T. (2002). Assessing bilingual dominance. Applied Psycholinguistics, 23, 567–598.Google Scholar
Flege, J., Takagi, N. and Mann, V. (1995). Japanese adults can learn to produce English /r/ and /l/ accurately. Language and Speech, 38, 25–55.Google Scholar
Flege, J., Yeni-Komshian, G. and Liu, S. (1999). Age constraints on second-language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 78–104.Google Scholar
Fontanini, I. and Tomitch, L. (2009). Working memory capacity and L2 university students’ comprehension of linear texts and hypertexts. International Journal of English Studies, 9, 1–18.Google Scholar
Forgas, J. and Koch, A. (2013). Mood effects on cognition. In Robinson, M., Watkins, E. and Harmon-Jones, E. (eds.), Handbook of cognition and emotion (pp. 231–251). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Forsberg, F. (2008). Le langage préfabriqué: Formes, fonctions et fréquences en français parlé L2 et L1. Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Forsberg Lundell, F. and Bartning, I. (2015a). Cultural migrants: Introducing a new concept in SLA research. In Forsberg Lundell, F. and Bartning, I. (eds.), Cultural migrants and optimal language acquisition (pp. 1–13). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Forsberg Lundell, F. and Bartning, I. (2015b). Successful profiles in high-level L2 French: “C’est un choix de vie.” In Forsberg Lundell, F. and Bartning, I. (eds.), Cultural migrants and optimal language acquisition (pp. 59–82). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Forsberg Lundell, F. and Sandgren, M. (2013). High-level proficiency in late L2 acquisition: Relationships between collocational production, language aptitude and personality. In Long, M. and Granena, G. (eds.), Sensitive periods, language aptitude, and ultimate L2 attainment (pp. 231–255). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Forsberg Lundell, F., Bartning, I., Engle, H., Gudmundson, A., Hancock, V. and Lindqvist, C. (2014). Beyond advanced stages in high-level spoken L2 French. Journal of French Language Studies, 24, 255–280. DOI: 10.1017/S0959269513000057Google Scholar
Forsberg Lundell, F., Eyckmans, J., Rosiers, A. and Arvidsson, K. (2018). Is multicultural effectiveness related to phrasal knowledge in English as a second language? International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 7, 232–240. http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.7n.2p.232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, P., Bolibaugh, C. and Kotula, A. (2014). Knowledge of nativelike selections in a L2. The influence of exposure, memory, age of onset, and motivation in foreign language and immersion settings. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36, 101–132.Google Scholar
Franks, D. (2010). Neurosociology. The nexus between neuroscience and social psychology. New York, NY: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
Frazier, L. and Hooker, K. (2006). Possible selves in adult development: Linking theory and research. In Dunkel, C. and Kerpelman, J. (eds.), Possible selves: Theory, research and applications. (pp. 41–59). New York: Nova Science.Google Scholar
Fredrickson, B. (2003). The value of positive emotions. American Scientist, 91, 330–335.Google Scholar
Freeman, J. (2005). Permission to be gifted: How conceptions of giftedness can change lives. In Sternberg, R. and Davidson, J. (eds.), Conceptions of giftedness. 2nd ed. (pp. 80–97). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Freeman, M., Shook, A. and Marian, V. (2016). Cognitive and emotional effects of bilingualism in adulthood. In Nicoladis, E. and Montanari, A. (eds.), Bilingualism across the lifespan (pp. 285–303). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Frenkel-Brunswik, E. (1948). Tolerance toward ambiguity as a personality variable. American Psychologist, 3, 268.Google Scholar
Gabryś-Barker, D. and Gałajda, D. (eds.) (2016). Positive psychology perspectives on foreign language learning and teaching. Basel, Switzerland: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
Gagné, F. (1999). My convictions about the nature of human abilities, gifts and talents. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 22, 109–136.Google Scholar
Gagné, F. (2005). From gifts to talents. The DGMT as a developmental model. In Sternberg, R. and Davidson, J. (eds.), Conceptions of giftedness. 2nd ed. (pp. 98–119). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gailliot, M., Mead, N. and Baumeister, R. (2008). Self-regulation. In John, O., Robins, R. and Pervin, L. (eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 472–491). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Gal, S. (1978). Variation and change in patterns of speaking: Language shift in Austria. In Sankoff, D. (ed.), Linguistic variation: Models and methods (pp. 227–239). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Galton, F. (1892). Hereditary genius. An inquiry into its laws and consequences. New York, NY: MacMillan and Co.Google Scholar
García Mayo, M. and Alcón Soler, E. (2013). Negotiated input and output/interaction. In Herschensohn, J. and Young-Scholten, M. (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 209–229). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gardner, H. (1983 and 2011). The theory of multiple intelligences. Annals of Dyslexia, 37(1),19–35. Reprinted/updated as Frames of Mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gardner, R. and Lambert, W. (1972). Attitudes and motivation in second-language learning. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Gardner, R. C. (1985). Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Gardner, R. C. (2010). Motivation and second language acquisition. The socio-educational model. New York, NY: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Gardner, R., Masgoret, A. and Tremblay, P. (1999). Home background characteristics and second language learning. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 18, 419–437.Google Scholar
Gathercole, S., Tiffany, C., Briscoe, J. and Thorn, A. (2005). Developmental consequences of poor phonological short-term memory function in childhood: A longitudinal study. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46(6), 598–611. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00379.xGoogle Scholar
Geschwind, N. and Galaburda, A. (1985). Cerebral lateralization: Biological mechanisms, associations and pathology. Archives of Neurology, 42, 428–59.Google Scholar
Ghyasi, M., Yazdani, M. and Farsani, M. (2013). The relationship between personality types and self-regulated learning strategies of language learners. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 2(4), 74–82. DOI: 10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.2n.4p.74Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. (2003). Embodied experience and linguistic meaning. Brain and Language, 84(1), 1–15.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. (2005). Embodiment and cognitive science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Giles, H. and Smith, P. (1979). Accommodation theory: Optimal levels of convergence. In Giles, H. and Sinclair, R. (eds.), Language and social psychology (pp. 45–65). Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, D. (2012). What’s the language of the United States? In E. M. Rickerson and B. Hilton, eds., The 5-minute linguist (pp. 167–171). Sheffield, UK: Equinox.Google Scholar
Goldberg, E. and Costa, L. (1981). Hemisphere differences in the acquisition and use of descriptive systems. Brain and Language, 14, 144–173.Google Scholar
Goldberg, L. (1990). An alternative “description of personality”: The Big Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216–1229.Google Scholar
Golestani, N. (2014). Brain structural correlates of individual differences at low- to high-levels of the language processing hierarchy: A review of new approaches to imaging research. International Journal of Bilingualism, 18, 6–34.Google Scholar
Golestani, N. and Pallier, C. (2007). Anatomical correlates of foreign speech sound production. Cerebral Cortex, 17(4), 929–34.Google Scholar
Golestani, N. and Zatorre, R. (2004). Learning new sounds of speech: Reallocation of neural substrates. Neuroimage, 21(2), 494–506.Google Scholar
Golestani, N., Price, C. and Scott, S. (2011). Born with an ear for dialects? Structural plasticity in the expert phonetician brain. The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 31(11), 4213–4220. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3891-10.2011Google Scholar
Gollwitzer, P. and Oettingen, G. (2011). Planning promotes goal striving. In Vohs, K. and Baumeister, R. (eds.), Handbook of self-regulation. Research, theory and applications (pp. 162–185). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Goo, J. (2010). The cognitive neuroscience of second language acquisition and bilingualism. Language Teaching, 43, 245–254.Google Scholar
Goodluck, H. (2009). Formal and computational constraints on language development. In Hoff, E. and Shatz, M. (eds.), Blackwell handbook of language development (pp. 46–67). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gottfried, T. (2008). Music and language learning. Effects of musical training on learning L2 speech contrasts. In Bohn, O. and Munro, M. (eds.), Language experience in second language speech learning (pp. 221–237). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Greenspan, D., Solomon, B. and Gardner, H. (2004). The development of talent in different domains. In Shavinina, L. and Ferrari, M. (eds.), Beyond knowledge. Extracognitive aspects of developing high ability (pp. 191–136). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Gregersen, R. and MacIntyre, P. (2014). Capitalizing on language learners’ individuality: From premise to practice. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Gregg, K. (1996). The logical and developmental problems of second language acquisition. In Ritchie, W. and Bhatia, T. (eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 49–81). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Griffiths, C. (2008). Lessons from good language learners. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grigorenko, E., Sternberg, R. and Ehrman, M. (2000). A theory-based approach to the measurement of foreign language learning ability: The CANAL-F theory and test. Modern Language Journal, 84, 390–405.Google Scholar
Grosjean, F. (July 13, 2010). Linguistic traps await deep cover spies. The Guardian. www.theguardian.com/education/2010/jul/13/deep-cover-languageGoogle Scholar
Grosjean, F. (2016). The Complementarity Principle and its impact on processing, acquisition and dominance. In Silva-Corvalán, C. and Treffers-Daller, J. (eds.), Language dominance in bilinguals. Issues of measurement and operationalization (pp. 66–84). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gross, J. and Thompson, R. (2007). Emotion regulation: Conceptual foundations. In Gross, J. (ed.), Handbook of emotion regulation (pp. 3–24). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Gudmundson, A. and Bardel, C. (2015). Beyond native-like? The lexical profile of a cultural migrant in Italy. In Forsberg Lundell, F. and Bartning, I. (eds.), Cultural migrants and optimal language acquisition (pp. 17–58). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Guiora, A., Acton, W., Erard, R. and Strickland, F. (1980). The effects of Benzodiazepine (valium) on permeability of language ego boundaries. Language Learning, 30, 351–363.Google Scholar
Guiora, A., Beit-Hallami, B., Brannon, R., Dull, C. and Scovel, T. (1972). The effects of experimentally-induced changes in ego states on pronunciation ability in second language: An exploratory study. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 13, 421–28.Google Scholar
Gyurak, A. and Etkin, A. (2014). A neurobiological model of implicit and explicit emotion regulation. In Gross, J. (ed.), Handbook of emotion regulation (pp. 76–90). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Hammer, K. and Dewaele, J-M. (2015). Acculturation as the key to ultimate attainment? The case of Polish-English bilinguals in the UK. In Forsberg Lundell, F. and Bartning, I. (eds.), Cultural migrants and optimal language acquisition (pp. 178–202). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Hammer, M., Bennett, M. and Wiseman, R. (2003). Measuring intercultural sensitivity: The Intercultural Development Inventory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 27, 421–443.Google Scholar
Hancock, V. (2000). Quelques connecteurs et modalisateurs dans le français parlé d’apprenants universitaires. Cahiers de la recherché, 16. Stockholm University.Google Scholar
Hansen, D. (1995). A study of the effect of the acculturation model on second language acquisition. In Eckman, F., Highland, D., Lee, P., Mileham, J. and Rutkowski-Weber, R. (eds.), Second language acquisition theory and pedagogy (pp. 305–316). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Harmon-Jones, E., Price, T., Peterson, C., Gable, P. and Harmon-Jones, C. (2013). The influence of behavioral approach and behavioral inhibition sensitivities on emotive cognitive processes. In Robinson, M., Watkins, E. and Harmon-Jones, E. (eds.), Handbook of cognition and emotion (pp. 329–346). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Hassall, T. (2015). Individual variation in L2 study abroad outcomes: A case study from Indonesian pragmatics. Multilingua, 34, 33–59.Google Scholar
Hawley, P. and Little, T. (2002). Evolutionary and developmental perspectives on the agentic self. In Cervone, D. and Mischel, W. (eds.), Advances in personality science (pp. 177–195). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Heller, K. (1991). The nature and development of giftedness: A longitudinal study. European Journal for High Ability, 2, 174–188.Google Scholar
Heller, W., Schmidtke, J., Nitschke, J., Koven, N. and Miller, G. (2002). States, traits and symptoms. Investigating the neural correlates of emotion, personality and psychopathology. In Cervone, D. and Mischel, W. (eds.), Advances in personality science (pp. 106–126). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Hellman, A. (2011). Vocabulary size and depth of word knowledge in adult-onset second language acquisition. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 21, 162–182.Google Scholar
Herdina, P. and Jessner, U. (2002). A dynamic view of multilingualism: Changing the psycholinguistic perspective. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Hernandez, A. (2009). Language switching in the bilingual brain: What’s next? Brain and Language, 109, 133–140.Google Scholar
Hernandez, A., Hiscock, M. and Bates, E. (2009). The development of neural substrates of language over the lifespan. In de Bot, K. and Schrauf, R. (eds.), Language development over the lifespan (pp. 288–308). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94, 319–340.Google Scholar
Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Hopp, H. (2009). The syntax-discourse interface in near-native L2 acquisition: Off-line and on-line performance. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 12, 463–483.Google Scholar
Hopp, H. (2010). Ultimate attainment in L2 inflection: Performance similarities between non-native and native speakers. Lingua, 120, 901–931.Google Scholar
Horwitz, E. (1990). Attending to the affective domain in the foreign language classroom. In Magnan, S. (ed.), Shifting the instructional focus to the learner (pp. 15–33). Middlebury, VT: Northeast Conference of Foreign Language Teachers.Google Scholar
Horwitz, E. (2010). Foreign and second language anxiety. Language Teaching, 43, 154–167.Google Scholar
Housen, A., Kuiken, F. and Vedder, I. (eds.) (2012). Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency: Complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Howe, M. (2004). Some insights of geniuses into the causes of exceptional achievement. In Shavinina, L. and Ferrari, M. (eds.), Beyond knowledge. Extracognitive aspects of developing high ability (pp. 105–118). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Howe, M., Davidson, J. and Sloboda, J. (1998). Innate talents: Reality or myth? Behavioral and Brain Science, 21, 399–407.Google Scholar
Hsieh, P. (2012). Attribution: Looking back and ahead at the “why” theory. In Mercer, S., Ryan, S. and Williams, M. (eds.), Psychology for language learning: Insights from research, theory and practice (pp. 90–102). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. DOI: 10.1057/9781137032829_7Google Scholar
Hsieh, P. and Kang, H. (2010). Attribution and self-efficacy and their interrelationship in the Korean EFL context. Language Learning 60, 606–627.Google Scholar
Hu, X., Ackermann, H., Martin, J., Erb, M., Winkler, S. and Reiterer, S. (2012). Language aptitude for pronunciation in advanced second language (L2) learners: Behavioral predictors and neural substrates. Brain and Language, 127, 366–376. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2012.11.006Google Scholar
Hu, X. and Reiterer, S. (2009). Personality and pronunciation talent in second language acquisition. In Dogil, G. and Reiterer, S. (eds.), Language talent and brain activity (pp. 97–129). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hulstijn, J. (2015). Language proficiency in native and non-native speakers. Theory and research. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Hummel, K. and French, L. (2016). Phonological memory and aptitude components: Contributions to second language proficiency. Learning and Individual Differences, 51, 249–255.Google Scholar
Hyltenstam, K. (2016a). The polyglot – an initial characterization on the basis of multiple anecdotal accounts. In Hyltenstam, K. (ed.), Advanced proficiency and exceptional ability in second languages (pp. 215–240). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Hyltenstam, K. (2016b). The exceptional ability of polyglots to achieve high-level proficiency. In Hyltenstam, K. (ed.), Advanced proficiency and exceptional ability in second languages (pp. 241–272). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Hyltenstam, K. and Abrahamsson, N. (2012). Introduction. High-level L2 acquisition, learning, and use. Studies in Second language Acquisition, 34, 177–186.Google Scholar
Indefrey, P. (2006). It is time to work toward explicit processing models for native and second language speakers. Applied Psycholinguist, 27, 66–69. DOI: 10.1017/S0142716406280032Google Scholar
Ioup, G., Boustagi, E., El Tigi, M. and Moselle, M. (1994). Re-examining the critical period hypothesis: A case study of successful adult SLA in a naturalistic environment. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 73–98.Google Scholar
Ivaz, L., Costa, A. and Duñabeitia, J. (2016). The emotional impact of being myself: Emotions and foreign language processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 42, 489–496.Google Scholar
Iwaniec, J. (2014). Self-constructs in language learning: What is their role in self-regulation? In Csizér, K. and Magid, M. (eds.), The impact of self-concept on language learning (pp. 189–205). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Izard, C. (2009). Emotion theory and research: Highlights, unanswered questions, and emerging issues. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 1–25.Google Scholar
Izard, C., Stark, K., Trentacosta, C. and Schultz, D. (2008). Beyond emotion regulation: Emotion utilization and adaptive functioning. Child Development Perspectives, 2(3), 156–163.Google Scholar
Jackson, J. (2010). Intercultural journeys: From study to residence abroad. New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Jarvis, P. (2006). Towards a comprehensive theory of human learning. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jessner, U. and Török, V. (2017). Strategies in multilingual learning: Opening new research avenues. In Pfenninger, S. and Navracsics, J. (eds.), Future research directions for applied linguistics (pp. 192–211). Bristol: Multilingual Matters, Ltd.Google Scholar
Jia, G. and Aaronson, D. (2003). A longitudinal study of Chinese children and adolescents learning English in the United States. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24, 131–161.Google Scholar
Jia, G., Strange, W., Wu, Y., Collado, J. and Guan, Q. (2006). Perception and production of English vowels by Mandarin speakers: Age-related differences vary with amount of L2 exposure. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119, 1118–1130.Google Scholar
Jilka, M. (2009). Talent and proficiency in language. In Dogil, G. and Reiterer, S. (eds.), Language talent and brain activity (pp. 1–16). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
John, O. and Robbins, R. (1993). Gordon Allport: Father and critic of the five-factor model. In Craik, K., Hogan, R. and Wolfe, R. (eds.), Fifty years of personality psychology (pp. 215–236). New York, NY: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Johnsen, S. (2009). Aptitudes. In Kerr, B. (ed.), Encyclopedia of giftedness, creativity and talent (pp. 44–47). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Johnson, A. (ed.) (2000). Blackwell dictionary of sociology. 2nd ed. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. and Bouchard, T. (2016). Genetics of intellectual and personality traits associated with creative genius. Could geniuses be cosmobian dragon kings? In Simonton, D. (ed.), The Wiley handbook of genius (pp. 269–296). Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Juffs, A. and Harrington, M. (2011). Aspects of working memory in L2 learning. Language Teaching, 44, 137–166.Google Scholar
Kachlicka, M., Saito, K. and Tierney, A. (2019). Successful second language learning is tied to robust domain-general auditory processing and stable neural representation of sound. Brain and Language, 192, 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2019.02.004Google Scholar
Kachru, B. (1986). The alchemy of English: The spread, functions, and models of non-native Englishes. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Kang, D-M. (2014). The effects of study abroad experiences on EFL learners’ willingness to communicate, speaking abilities and participation in classroom interaction. System, 42, 319–332.Google Scholar
Kasper, G. and Ross, S. (2013). Assessing second language pragmatics. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kaufman, J., Kaufman, S., Beghetto, R., Burgess, S. and Persson, R. (2009). Creative giftedness: Beginnings, developments, and future promises. In Shavinina, L. (ed.), International handbook on giftedness (pp. 585–598). New York, NY: Springer Science+Business Media.Google Scholar
Kellerman, E. (1983). Now you see it, now you don’t. In Gass, S. and Selinker, L. (eds.), Language transfer in language learning (pp. 112–130). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Kellerman, E. and Bialystok, E. (1997). On psychological plausibility in the study of communication strategies. In Kasper, G. and Kellerman, E. (eds.), Communication strategies: Psycholinguistic and sociolinguistic perspectives (pp. 31–48). London: Longman.Google Scholar
Kemper, C. (2007). Strategic processing in grammar learning: Do multilinguals use more strategies? International Journal of Multilingualism, 4, 241–261.Google Scholar
Kemper, S. (2009). The role of working memory in language development over the lifespan. In de Bot, K. and Schrauf, R. (eds.), Language development over the lifespan (pp. 271–287). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kerr, B. (ed.) (2009). Encyclopedia of giftedness, creativity, and talent. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Kharkhurin, A. (2008). The effect of linguistic proficiency, age of second language acquisition, and length of exposure to a new cultural environment on bilinguals’ divergent thinking. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11, 225–243.Google Scholar
Kim, J. and Nassaji, H. (2018). Incidental focus on form and the role of learner extraversion. Language Teaching Research, 22(6), 698–718.Google Scholar
Kim, Y. (2001). Becoming intercultural: An integrative theory of communication and cross-cultural adaptation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Kinsella, C. and Singleton, D. (2014). Much more than age. Special Issue, Carmen Munoz (ed.), “Factors Interplaying with Age in Second Language Learning,” Applied Linguistics, 35(4), 441–462.Google Scholar
Klinger, E. (1996). Emotional influences on cognitive processing, with implications for theories of both. In Gollwitzer, P. and Bargh, J. (eds.), The psychology of action. Linking cognition and motivation to behavior (p. 168–189). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Kluckhohn, C. and Murray, H. (1953). Personality formation: The determinants. In Kluckhohn, C., Murray, H. and Schneider, D. (eds.), Personality in nature, society and culture (pp. 53–67). New York, NY: Knopf.Google Scholar
Knafo, A. and Israel, S. (2012). Empathy, prosocial behavior, and other aspects of kindness. In Zentner, M. and Shiner, R. (eds.), Handbook of temperament (pp. 168–179). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Knightly, L., Jun, S., Oh, J. and Au, T. (2003). Production benefits of childhood overhearing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 114, 465–474.Google Scholar
Koelsch, S., Gunter, T., Cramon, D., Zysset, S., Lohmann, G. and Friederici, A. (2002). Bach speaks: A cortical “language-network” serves the processing of music. NeuroImage, 17, 956–966.Google Scholar
Koestner, R. and Losier, G. (2002). Distinguishing three ways of being highly motivated: A closer look at introjection, identification and intrinsic motivation. In Deci, E. and Ryan, R. (eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 101–121). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.Google Scholar
Kok, E. and de Bruin, A. (2018). The neuroscience of motor expertise in real-world tasks. In Hambrick, D., Campitelli, G. and Macnamara, B. (eds.), The science of expertise. Behavioral, neural and genetic approaches to complex skill (pp. 218–237). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Koole, S. (2010). The psychology of emotion regulation. In DeHouwer, J. and Hermans, D. (eds.), Cognition and emotion. Reviews of current research and theories (pp. 128–167). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Korzilius, H., van Hooft, A., Planken, B. and Hendrix, C. (2011). Birds of different feathers? The relationship between multicultural personality dimensions and foreign language mastery in business professionals working in a Dutch agricultural multinational. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 35, 540–553.Google Scholar
Kovács, A. (2016). Cognitive effects of bilingualism in infancy. In Nicoladis, E. and Montanari, A. (eds.), Bilingualism across the lifespan (pp. 249–268). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton and Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Kozbelt, A. (2014). Musical creativity over the lifespan. In Simonton, D. (ed.), The Wiley handbook of genius (pp. 450–472). Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Krahé, B. (1990). Situation cognition and coherence in personality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Krashen, S. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. New York, NY: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Kraus, N., Strait, D. and Parbery-Clark, A. (2012). Cognitive factors shape brain networks for auditory skills: Spotlight on auditory working memory. In Overy, K. (ed.), The neurosciences and music, IV: Learning and memory. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 1252 (pp. 100–107). Boston, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishing on behalf of the New York Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Krueger, R., Johnson, W. and Kling, K. (2006). Behavior genetics and personality development. In Mroczek, D. and Little, T. (eds.), Handbook of personality development (pp. 81–108). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Kuhl, J. (1986). Motivation and information processing. A new look at decision making, dynamic change and action control. In Sorrentino, R. and Higgins, E. (eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition. Foundations of social behavior (pp. 404–434). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Labrie, N. and Clément, R. (1986). Ethnolinguistic vitality, self-confidence and second language proficiency: An investigation. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 7, 269–282.Google Scholar
LaBuda, M., DeFries, J. and Fulker, D. (1987). Genetic and environmental covariance structures among WISC-R subtests: A twin study. Intelligence, 11, 233–244.Google Scholar
Lahmann, C., Steinkrauss, R. and Schmid, M. (2016). Factors affecting grammatical and lexical complexity of long-term L2 speakers’ oral proficiency. Language Learning, 66, 354–385.Google Scholar
Lakin, J., Jefferis, V., Cheng, C. and Chartrand, T. (2003). The chameleon effect as social glue: Evidence for the evolutionary significance of nonconscious mimicry. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 27(3), 145–162. DOI: 10.1023/A:1025389814290Google Scholar
Lantolf, J. and Pavlenko, A. (2001). (S)econd (L)anguage (A)ctivity theory: Understanding second language learners as people. In Breen, M. (ed.), Learner contributions to language learning (pp. 141–158). London: Longman.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2011). A complexity theory approach to second language develop- ment/acquisition. In Atkinson, D. (ed.), Alternative approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 48–72). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2018). Looking ahead: Future directions in, and future research into, second language acquisition. Foreign Language Annals, 51(1), 55–72.Google Scholar
Le Pichon-Vorstman, E., De Swart, H., Ceginskas, V. and Van den Bergh, H. (2009). Language learning experience in school context and metacognitive awareness of multilingual children. International Journal of Multilingualism, 6(3), 258–280.Google Scholar
Leaver, B. and Shekhtman, B. (2002). Developing professional-level language proficiency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Leibetseder, M., Laireiter, A. and Köller, T. (2007). Structural analysis of the E-Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 4, 547–561.Google Scholar
Leong, C. (2007). Predictive validity of the multicultural personality questionnaire: A longitudinal study on the socio-psychological adaption and intercultural experience among Asian graduates. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 31, 545–559.Google Scholar
Levine, L. and Edelstein, R. (2010). Emotion and memory narrowing: A review and goal-relevance approach. In DeHouwer, J. and Hermans, D. (eds.), Cognition and emotion. Reviews of current research and theories (pp. 168–210). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Levis, J. (2005). Changing contexts and shifting paradigms in pronunciation teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 39, 369–377.Google Scholar
Lewandowski, N. and Jilka, M. (2019). Phonetic convergence, language talent, personality and attention. Frontiers in Communication, 4, article 18. www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcomm.2019.00018/fullGoogle Scholar
Li, S. (2015). The associations between language aptitude and second language grammar acquisition: A meta-analytic review of five decades of research. Applied Linguistics, 36, 385–408. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu054Google Scholar
Linck, J., Hughes, M., Campbell, S., Silbert, N., Tare, M., Jackson, S., Smith, B., Bunting, M. and Doughty, C. (2013). Hi-LAB: A new measure of aptitude for high-level language proficiency. Language Learning, 63(3), 530–566. DOI: 10.1111/lang.12011Google Scholar
Lowie, W., Van Dijk, M., Chan, H. and Verspoor, M. (2017). Finding the key to successful L2 learning in groups and individuals. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 7(1), 127–148.Google Scholar
Lowie, W., Verspoor, M. and de Bot, K. (2009). A dynamic view of second language development across the lifespan. In de Bot, K. and Schrauf, R. (eds.), Language development over the lifespan (pp. 125–145). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lybeck, K. (2002). Cultural identifications and second language pronunciation of Americans in Norway. Modern Language Journal, 86, 174–191.Google Scholar
Lyons, D. (2014). The L2 self-concept in second language learning motivation: A longitudinal study of Korean university students. In Csizér, K. and Magid, M., (eds.), The impact of self-concept on language learning (pp. 108–130). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Macaro, E. (2006). Strategies for language learning and for language use: Revising the theoretical framework. The Modern Language Journal, 90(3), 320–337. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2006.00425.xGoogle Scholar
MacIntyre, P. (2016). So far so good: An overview of positive psychology and its contributions to SLA. In Gabryś-Barker, D. and Gałajda, D. (eds.), Positive psychology perspectives on foreign language learning and teaching (pp. 3–20). Basel, Switzerland: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, P. and Charos, C. (1996). Personality, attitudes, and affect as predictors of second language communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 15, 3–26.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, P. and Gregersen, T. (2012). Emotions that facilitate language learning: The positive-broadening power of the imagination. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 2(2), 193–213.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, P., Baker, S., Clement, R. and Donovan, L. (2002). Sex and age effects on willingness to communicate, anxiety, perceived competence, and L2 motivation among junior high school French immersion students. Language Learning, 52, 537–64.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, P., Dörnyei, Z., Clément, R. and Noels, K. (1998). Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. Modern Language Journal, 82, 545–562.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, P., Gregersen, T. and Mercer, S. (2019). Setting an agenda for positive psychology in SLA: Theory, practice and research. Modern Language Journal, 103, 262–274.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, P., MacKinnon, S. and Clément, R. (2009). The baby, the bathwater, and the future of language learning motivation research. In Dörnyei, Z. and Ushioda, E. (eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 43–65). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
MacKay, I., Flege, J. and Imai, S. (2006). Evaluating the effects of chronological age and sentence duration on degree of perceived accent. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 157–183.Google Scholar
Macnamara, B., Hambrick, D., Frank, D., King, M., Burgoyne, A. and Meinz, E. (2018). The deliberate practice view. An evaluation of definitions, claims, and empirical evidence. In Hambrick, D., Campitelli, G. and Macnamara, V. (eds.), The science of expertise. Behavioral, neural and genetic approaches to complex skill (pp. 151–168). New York NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Magai, C. and McFadden, S. (1995). The role of emotions in social and personality development. New York, NY: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Magnusson, J. and Stroud, C. (2012). High proficiency in markets of performance: A sociocultural approach to nativelikeness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34, 321–345.Google Scholar
Major, R. (1993). Sociolinguistic factors in loss and acquisition of phonology. In Hyltenstam, K. and Viberg, A. (eds.), Progression and regression in language: Sociocultural, neuropsychological and linguistic perspectives (pp. 463–478). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Major, R. (2001). Foreign accent. The ontogeny and phylogeny of second language phonology. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Major, R. (2007). Identifying a foreign accent in an unfamiliar language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29, 539–556.Google Scholar
Major, R., Fitzmaurice, S., Bunta, F. and Balasubramanian, C. (2002). The effects of nonnative accents on listening comprehension: Implications for ESL assessment. TESOL Quarterly, 36(2), 173–190.Google Scholar
Maree, J. and van der Westhuizen, C. (2009). Giftedness and diversity: Research and education in Africa. In Shavinina, L. (ed.), International handbook on giftedness (pp. 1409–1425). New York, NY: Springer Science+Business Media.Google Scholar
Markus, H. and Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41(9), 954–969. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.41.9.954Google Scholar
Marx, N. (2002). Never quite a “native speaker”: Accent and identity in the L2 – and the L1. Canadian Modern Language Review, 59, 264–281.Google Scholar
Masgoret, A. and Gardner, R. (2003). Attitudes, motivation, and second language learning: A meta-analysis of studies conducted by Gardner and associates. Language Learning, 53, 167–210. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467–9922.00227Google Scholar
Matthews, G. (2009). Personality and performance: Cognitive processes and models. In Corr, P. and Matthews, G. (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personality psychology (pp. 400–426). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Matthews, G. and Dorn, L. (1995). Cognitive and attentional processes in personality and intelligence. In Saklofske, D. H. and Zeidner, M. (eds.), International handbook of personality and intelligence (pp. 367–396). New York, NY: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Mayer, J., Salovey, P. and Sluyter, D. (1997). What is emotional intelligence? In P. Salovey and D. Sluyter (eds.), Emotional development and emotional intelligence: Educational implications (pp. 3–34). New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
McAdams, D. (2010). What do we know when we know a person? In Funder, D. and Ozer, D. (eds.), Pieces of the personality puzzle. Readings in theory and research (pp. 4–17). New York, NY: Norton.Google Scholar
McAdams, D. and Adler, J. (2006). How does personality develop? In Mroczek, D. and Little, T. (eds.), Handbook of personality development (pp. 470–492). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. and Allik, J. (eds.) (2002). The Five-Factor model of personality across cultures. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic Publisher.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. and Costa, P. (1997). Longitudinal stability of adult personality. In Hogan, R., Johnson, J., and Briggs, S. (eds.), Handbook of Personality Psychology (pp. 269–92). San Diego, CA: Academic.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. and Costa, P. (2008). The five-factor theory of personality. In John, O., Robins, R. and Pervin, L. (eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (p. 159–181). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. and Greenberg, D. (2014). Openness to experience. In Simonton, D. (ed.), The Wiley handbook of genius (pp. 222–243). Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, B. and Nayak, N. (1989). Processing a new language. Does knowing other languages make the difference? In Dechert, H. W. and Raupach, M. (eds.), Interlingual processes (p. 516). Tübingen, Germany: Gunter Narr Verlag.Google Scholar
McRae, K., Ochsner, K. and Gross, J. (2011). The reason in passion. A social cognitive neuroscience approach to emotion regulation. In Vohs, K. and Baumeister, R. (eds.), Handbook of self-regulation. Research, theory and applications (pp. 186–203). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Meara, P. (2005). LLAMA language aptitude tests. The manual. Swansea: University of Wales, Swansea.Google Scholar
Mechelli, A., Crinion, J., Noppeney, U., O’Doherty, J., Ashburner, J., Frackowiak, R. and Price, C. (2004). Neurolinguistics: Structural plasticity in the bilingual brain. Nature, 431(7010), 757–757.Google Scholar
Mercer, S. (2012a). Dispelling the myth of the natural-born linguist. ELT Journal, 66(1), 22–29.Google Scholar
Mercer, S. (2012b). The dynamic nature of a tertiary learner’s foreign language self-concept. In Pawlak, M. (ed.), New perspectives on individual differences in language learning and teaching (pp. 201–215). Berlin, Germany: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
Mercer, S. (2014). The self from a complexity perspective. In Mercer, S. and Williams, M. (eds.), Multiple perspectives on the self in SLA (pp. 160–176). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Mercer, S. (2016). Empathy in language learning and teaching. In MacIntyre, P., Gregersen, T. and Mercer, S. (eds.), Positive psychology in SLA (pp. 91–111). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Merrotsy, P. (2013a). Invisible gifted students. Talent Development and Excellence, 5, 31–42.Google Scholar
Merrotsy, P. (2013b). Tolerance for ambiguity: A trait of the creative personality? Creativity Research Journal, 25, 232–237.Google Scholar
Mertens, D. (1998). Research methods in education and psychology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Miller, E. and Kubota, R. (2013). Second language identity construction. In Herschensohn, J. and Young-Scholten, M. (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 230–250). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, G. (2010). Mistreating psychology in the decades of the brain. Perspectives in Psychological Science, 5, 716–743. DOI: 10.1177/1745691610388774Google Scholar
Miller, J. (2003). Audible difference: ESL and social identity in schools. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Mills, N. (2014). Self-efficacy in second language acquisition. In Mercer, S. and Williams, M. (eds.), Multiple perspectives on the self in SLA (pp. 6–22) Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Mills, N. A., Pajares, F. and Herron, C. (2007). Self-efficacy of college intermediate French students: Relation to achievement and motivation. Language Learning, 57 (3), 417–442.Google Scholar
Mischel, W. (1973). Toward a cognitive social learning reconceptualization of personality. Psychological Review, 80, 252–283.Google Scholar
Mischel, W. (2010). Consistency and specificity in behavior? In Funder, D. and Ozer, D. (eds.), Pieces of the personality puzzle. Readings in theory and research (pp. 60–75). New York, NY: Norton.Google Scholar
Mischel, W. and Shoda, Y. (2010). The situation person. In Mesquita, B., Barrett, L. and Smith, E. (eds.), The mind in context (pp.149–173). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Moffitt, T., Belsky, Arseneault, Dickson, D., Hancox, N., Harrington, R., Houts, H., Poulton, R., Roberts, R., Ross, B., Sears, S., Thomson, M., W. M. and Caspi, A. (2011). A gradient of childhood self-control predicts health, wealth and public safety. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States (PNAS), 108 (7), 2693–2698. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1010076108Google Scholar
Moffitt, T., Poulton, R. and Caspi, A. (2013). Lifelong impact of early self-control. American Scientist, 101, 352–359.Google Scholar
Molnár, H. (2010). Der Einfluss des Faktors Alter auf die Aussprachekompetenz in der L2. Ergebnisse einer Pilotstudie mit DaZ-Lernern. Zeitschrift für Interkulturellen Fremdsprachenunterricht, 15, 42–60.Google Scholar
Moltzen, R. (2009). Talent development across the lifespan. In Shavinina, L. (ed.), International handbook on giftedness (pp. 353–380). New York, NY: Springer Science+Business Media.Google Scholar
Montrul, S. (2016) Dominance and proficiency in early and late bilingualism. In Silva-Corvalán, C. and Treffers-Daller, J. (eds.), Language dominance in bilinguals. Issues of measurement and operationalization (pp. 15–35). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moody, R. (1988). Personality preferences and foreign language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 72, 389–401.Google Scholar
Moors, A. (2010). Theories of emotion causation. A review. In De Houwer, J. and Hermans, D., (eds.), Cognition and emotion. Reviews of current research and theories (pp. 1–37). East Sussex: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Moors, A. and Scherer, K. (2013). The role of appraisal in emotion. In Robinson, M., Watkins, E. and Harmon-Jones, E. (eds.), Handbook of cognition and emotion (pp. 135–155). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Moss, P. (1995). Can there be validity without reliability? Educational Researcher, 23, 5–12.Google Scholar
Moyer, A. (1999). Ultimate attainment in L2 phonology. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 81–108.Google Scholar
Moyer, A. (2004). Age, accent and experience in second language acquisition. An integrated approach to critical period inquiry. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Moyer, A. (2006). Language contact and confidence in L2 listening comprehension: A pilot study of advanced learners of German. Foreign Language Annals, 39, 255–275.Google Scholar
Moyer, A. (2007). Do language attitudes determine accent? A study of bilinguals in the USA. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 28, 1–17.Google Scholar
Moyer, A. (2009). Input as a critical means to an end: Quantity and quality of experience in L2 phonological attainment. In Young-Scholten, M. and Piske, T. (eds.), Input matters in SLA (pp. 159–174). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Moyer, A. (2011). An investigation of experience in L2 phonology. Does quality matter more than quantity? Canadian Modern Language Review, 67, 191–216.Google Scholar
Moyer, A. (2013). Foreign accent: The phenomenon of non-native speech. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moyer, A. (2014a). Exceptional outcomes in L2 phonology: The critical factors of learner engagement and self-regulation. Special Issue, Carmen Munoz (ed.), “Factors interplaying with age in second language learning,” Applied Linguistics, 35(4), 418–440.Google Scholar
Moyer, A. (2014b).What’s age got to do with it? Accounting for individual factors in second language accent. Special Issue, David Singleton (ed.), “Age and more”, Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 4(3), 443–464.Google Scholar
Moyer, A. (2016). The puzzle of gender effects in L2 phonology. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 2, 8–29. DOI: 10.1075/jslp.2.1.01moyGoogle Scholar
Moyer, A. (2017). Autonomy in second language phonology: Choice vs. limits. Language Teaching, 50(3), 395–411. DOI: 10.1017/S0261444815000191Google Scholar
Moyer, A. (2018). Accent in a second language: Self-concept and self-regulation as teachable foundations. Special Issue, John Levis, Donna Brinton and Ana Wu (eds.), “Pronunciation: Research into practice and practice into research.” CATESOL Journal, 30, 1–18.Google Scholar
Muir, K., Joinson, A., Cotterill, R. and Dewdney, N. (2016). Characterizing the linguistic chameleon: Personal and social correlates of linguistic style accommodation. Human Communication Research, 42(3), 462–484. doi:10.1111/hcre.12083Google Scholar
Mulder, K. and Hulstijn, J. (2011). Linguistic skills of adult native speakers, as a function of age and level of education. Applied Linguistics, 32, 475–494.Google Scholar
Muñoz, C. and Singleton, D. (2007). Foreign accent in advanced learners: Two successful profiles. EUROSLA Yearbook, 7, 171–190.Google Scholar
Murray, B., Holland, A. and Kensinger, E. (2013). Episodic memory and emotion. In Robinson, M., Watkins, E and Harmon-Jones, E. (eds.), Handbook of cognition and emotion (pp. 156–175). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Murray, G. (2011). Imagination, metacognition and the L2 self in a self-access learning environment. In Murray, G., Gao, X. and Lamb, T. (eds.), Identity, motivation and autonomy in language learning (pp. 75–90). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Myers, I. and McCaulley, M. (1985). Manual: A guide to the development and use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Naiman, N., Fröhlich, M., Stern, H. and Todesco, A. (1978). The good language learner. Research in Education Series, 7. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.Google Scholar
Nakamura, S. (2018). How I see it: An exploratory study on attributions and emotions in L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 8, 553–574.Google Scholar
Nardo, D. and Reiterer, S. (2009). Musicality and phonetic language aptitude. In Dogil, G. and Reiterer, S. (eds.), Language talent and brain activity (pp. 213–255). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Navidinia, H., Beidokhti, Z. and Hekmati, N. (2017). English language learners’ big five personality characteristics and their preference for isolated or integrated form-focused instruction. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 26(1–2), 75–83. DOI: 10.1007/s40299-017-0328-3Google Scholar
Nayak, N., Hansen, N., Krueger, N. and McLaughlin, B. (1990). Language-learning strategies in monolingual and multilingual adults. Language Learning, 40, 221–244.Google Scholar
Nettle, D. (2006). The evolution of personality variation in humans and other animals. American Psychology, 61(6), 622–631. DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.61.6.622Google Scholar
Nicoladis, E. (2016). Bilinguals speakers’ cognitive development in childhood. In Nicoladis, E. and Montanari, A. (eds.), Bilingualism across the lifespan (pp. 269–284). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton and Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Nikolov, M. (2000). The critical period hypothesis reconsidered: Successful adult learners of Hungarian and English. IRAL, 38, 109–124.Google Scholar
Nikolov, M. (2001). A study of unsuccessful language learners. In Dörnyei, Z. and Schmidt, R. (eds.), Motivation and second language acquisition. Technical Report #23 (pp. 149–169). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.Google Scholar
Nikolova, Y., Bogdan, R. and Hariri, A. (2013). Neurogenetics approaches: Insights from studies of dopamine signaling and reward processing. In Robinson, M., Watkins, E. and Harmon-Jones, E. (eds.), Handbook of cognition and emotion (pp. 19–34). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Noels, K. (2009). The internalization of language learning into the self and social identity. In Dörnyei, Z. and Ushioda, E. (eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 295–313). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Noels, K., Chaffee, K., Michalyk, M. and McEown, M. (2014). Culture, autonomy and the self in language learning. In Csizér, K. and Magid, M., (eds.), The impact of self-concept on language learning (pp. 131–154). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Norris, J. and Ortega, L. (2009). Towards an organic approach to investigating CAF in instructed SLA. The case of complexity. Applied Linguistics, 30, 555–578.Google Scholar
Norton, B. (2002). Identity and imagined communities in language learning: A research trajectory. Presentation to School of Languages, Literatures and Cultures, University of Maryland, College Park, Oct. 16.Google Scholar
Norton, B. and Toohey, K. (2001). Changing perspectives on good language learners. TESOL Quarterly, 35, 307–322.Google Scholar
Novoa, L., Fein, D. and Obler, L. (1988). Talent in foreign languages: A case study. In Obler, L. and Fein, D. (eds.), The exceptional brain: Neuropsychology of talent and special abilities (pp. 294–302). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
O’Malley, J. and Chamot, A. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
O’Malley, J., Chamot, A. and Kupper, L. (1989). Listening comprehension strategies in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 10, 418–437.Google Scholar
Obler, L. (1989). Exceptional second language learners. In Gass, S., Madden, C., Preston, D. and Selinker, L. (eds.), Variation in second language acquisition, Vol. II: Psycholinguistic issues (pp. 141–159). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Obler, L. (1993). Neurolinguistic aspects of second language development and attrition. In Hyltenstam, K. and Viberg, A. (eds.), Progression and regression in language: Sociocultural, neuropsychological and linguistic perspectives (pp. 178–195). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ockey, G. (2011). Self-consciousness and assertiveness as explanatory variables of L2 oral ability: A latent variable approach. Language Learning, 61(3), 968–989. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00625.xGoogle Scholar
Ortega, L. and Byrnes, H. (2008). Theorizing advancedness, setting up the longitudinal research agenda. In Ortega, L. and Byrnes, H. (eds.), The longitudinal study of advanced L2 capacities (pp. 281–300). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Oxford, R. (2018). Emotion as the amplifier and the primary motive: Some theories of emotion with relevance to language learning. In Pawlak, M. and Mystkowska-Wiertelak, A. (eds.), Challenges of second and foreign language education in a globalized world (pp. 53–71). Basel, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
Oxford, R. and Crookall, D. (1989). Research on language learning strategies: Methods, findings and instructional issues. Modern Language Journal, 73, 404–419.Google Scholar
Oxford, R. and Lee, K. (2008). The learner’s landscape and journey: A summary. In Griffiths, C. (ed.), Lessons from good language learners (pp. 306–317). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Oxford, R. and Nyikos, M. (1989). Variables affecting choice of language learning strategies by university students. Modern Language Journal, 73, 291–300.Google Scholar
Oxford, R. L. (1989). Strategy Inventory for Language Learning. Alexandria, VA: Oxford Associates.Google Scholar
Oxford, R., Pacheco Acuña, G., Solís Hernández, M. and Smith, A. (2015). “A language is a mentality”: A narrative, positive-psychological view of six learners’ development of bilingualism. System, 55, 100–110. DOI: 10.1016/j.system.2015.08.005Google Scholar
Ożańska-Ponikwia, K. (2016). Personality, emotional intelligence and L2 use in an immigrant and non-immigrant context. In Gabryś-Barker, D. and Gałajda, D. (eds.), Positive psychology perspectives on foreign language learning and teaching (pp. 175–191). New York, NY: Springer International.Google Scholar
Ożańska-Ponikwia, K. and Dewaele, J-M. (2012). Personality and L2 use: Openminded and self-confident individuals are more likely to be active and proficient L2 users. EUROSLA Yearbook, 12, 112–134.Google Scholar
Ozer, D. and Benet-Martinez, V. (2010). Personality and the prediction of consequential outcomes. In Funder, D. and Ozer, D. (eds.), Pieces of the personality puzzle. Readings in theory and research (pp. 126–155). New York, NY: Norton.Google Scholar
Papagno, C. and Vallar, G. (1995). Verbal short-term memory and vocabulary learning in polyglots. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. A) Human Experimental Psychology, 48(1), 98–107.Google Scholar
Paradis, M. (2004). A neurolinguistics theory of bilingualism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Pavlenko, A. (2007). Autobiographic narratives as data in applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics, 28, 163–188.Google Scholar
Pavlenko, A. (2014). The bilingual mind and what it tells us about language and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pavlenko, A. and Norton, B. (2007). Imagined communities, identity, and English language learning. International Handbook of English Language Teaching, 15, 669–680.Google Scholar
Pawlak, M. and Szyszka, M. (2018). Researching pronunciation learning strategies: An overview and a critical look. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 8(2), 293–323.Google Scholar
Peacock, M. and Ho, B. (2003). Student language learning strategies across eight disciplines. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13(2), 179–200.Google Scholar
Pekrun, R., Götz, T., Titz, W. and Perry, R. (2002). Positive emotions in education. In Frydenberg, E. (ed.), Beyond coping: Meeting goals, visions, and challenges (pp. 149–173). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pekrun, R., Lichtenfeld, S., Marsh, H., Murayama, K. and Goetz, T. (2017). Achievement emotions and academic performance: Longitudinal models of reciprocal effects. Child Development, 88(5), 1653–1670. DOI: 10.1111/cdev.12704Google Scholar
Perani, D. (2005). The neural basis of language talent in bilinguals. Trends in Cognitive Science, 9, 211–213.Google Scholar
Pervin, L. and John, O. (2001). Personality, theory and research. 8th ed. New York: Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Pessoa, L. and Pereira, M. (2013). Cognition-emotion interactions: A review of the functional magnetic resonance imaging literature. In Robinson, M., Watkins, E. and Harmon-Jones, E. (eds.), Handbook of cognition and emotion (pp. 55–68). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Peterson, C. and Al-Haik, A. (1976). The development of the Defense Language Aptitude Battery (DLAB). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2, 369–380. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447603600216Google Scholar
Petrides, K. and Furnham, A. (2000). On the dimensional structure of emotional intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 1191–1210.Google Scholar
Pfenninger, S. and Navracsics, J. (2017). Future research directions for applied linguistics. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Pfenninger, S. and Singleton, D. (2017a). Beyond age effects in instructional L2 learning. Revisiting the age factor. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Pfenninger, S. and Singleton, D. (2017b). Recent advances in quantitative methods in age-related research. In Pfenninger, S. and Navracsics, J. (eds.), Future research directions for applied linguistics (pp.101–119). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Pickering, L. and Baker, A. (2014). Suprasegmental measures of accentedness. In Levis, J. and Moyer, A. (eds.), Social influences in L2 pronunciation (pp. 75–94). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Piechurska-Kuciel, E. (2016). Self-regulatory efficacy and foreign language attainment. In Gabryś-Barker, D. and Gałajda, D. (eds.), Positive psychology perspectives on foreign language learning and teaching (pp. 337–351). Basel, Switzerland: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
Piechurska-Kuciel, E. (2018). The influence of ambiguity tolerance on willingness to communicate in L2. In Pawlak, M. and Mystkowska-Wiertelak, A. (eds.), Challenges of second and foreign language education in a globalized world (pp. 167–184). Springer International Publishing. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-66975-5_11Google Scholar
Piller, I. (2002). Passing for a native speaker: Identity and success in second language learning. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 6, 179–206.Google Scholar
Pimsleur, P. (1966). Pimsleur language aptitude battery. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace & World.Google Scholar
Piniel, K. and Albert, A. (2018). Advanced learners’ foreign language-related emotions across the four skills. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 8, 127–147.Google Scholar
Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D., Garcia, T. and McKeachie, W. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and psychological measurement, 53, 801–813.Google Scholar
Piske, T., MacKay, I. and Flege, J. (2001). Factors affecting degree of foreign accent in an L2: A review. Journal of Phonetics, 29, 191–215.Google Scholar
Piskunov, A., Fusté, A., Teryaeva, N., Moshkin, A. and Ruiz, J. (2018). The hypothalamic-pituitary-thyroid axis and personality in a sample of healthy subjects. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 87, 181–187. DOI: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2017.10.023Google Scholar
Plomin, R. and Thompson, L. (1993). Genetics and high cognitive ability. In Bock, G. and Ackrill, K. (eds.), The origins and development of high ability. A Wiley-Interscience Publication. Ciba Foundation Symposium 178 (p. 67–84). West Sussex: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Plomin, R., Haworth, C., Meaburn, E., Price, T., Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium 2 and Davis, O. (2013). Common DNA markers can account for more than half of the genetic influence on cognitive abilities. Psychological Science, 24, 562–568.Google Scholar
Plonsky, L. (2011). The effectiveness of second language strategy instruction: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 61(4), 993–1038. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00663.xGoogle Scholar
Polat, N. (2014). The interaction of the L2 motivational self system with socialisation and identification patterns and L2 accent attainment. In Csizér, K. and Magid, M. (eds.), The impact of self-concept on language learning (pp. 268–295). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Poldrack, R. (2008). The role of fMRI in cognitive neuroscience: Where do we stand? Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 18, 223–227.Google Scholar
Poldrack, R. and Yarkoni, T. (2016). From brain maps to cognitive ontologies: Informatics and the search for mental structure. Annual Review of Psychology, 67, 587–612.Google Scholar
Pötzl, O. (1925). Über die parietal bedingte Aphasie und ihren Einfluss auf das Sprechen mehrerer Sprachen. Zeitschrift für die gesamte Neurologie und Psychiatrie, 96, 100–124.Google Scholar
Psaltou-Joycey, A. and Kantaridou, Z. (2009). Plurilingualism, language learning strategy use and learning style preferences. International Journal of Multilingualism, 6(4), 460–474.Google Scholar
Purcell, E. and Suter, R. (1980). Predictors of pronunciation accuracy: A re-examination. Language Learning, 30, 271–287.Google Scholar
Rajmohan, V. and Mohandas, E. (2007). Mirror neuron system. Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 49, 66–69. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2900004/Google Scholar
Randall, M. (2007). Memory, psychology and second language learning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Regan, V. (2004). The relationship between the group and the individual and the acquisition of native speaker variation patterns: A preliminary study. IRAL, 42, 335–348.Google Scholar
Reisenzein, R. and Weber, H. (2009). Personality and emotion. In Corr, P. and Matthews, G. (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personality psychology (pp. 54–71). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Reiterer, S. (2009). Brain and language talent: A synopsis. In Dogil, G. and Reiterer, S. (eds.), Language talent and brain activity (pp. 155–191). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Reiterer, S., Hu, X., Sumathi, T. and Singh, N. (2013). Are you a good mimic? Neuro-acoustic signatures for speech imitation ability. Frontiers in Psychology, 22, 782–782. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00782Google Scholar
Reiterer, S., Pereda, E. and Bhattacharya, J. (2011). On a possible relationship between linguistic experience and EEG gamma band phase synchrony. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, Article 334, 1–11. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00334Google Scholar
Renzulli, J. (2005). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for promoting creative productivity. In Sternberg, R. and Davidson, J. (eds.), Conceptions of giftedness. 2nd ed. (pp. 246–279). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ricciardelli, L. (1992). Creativity and bilingualism. Journal of Creative Behavior, 26, 242–254.Google Scholar
Riveiro, J., Cabanach, R. and Arias, A. (2001). Multiple goal pursuit and its relation to cognitive, self-regulatory, and motivational strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 561–572.Google Scholar
Roberts, B., Wood, D. and Caspi, A. (2010). The development of personality traits in adulthood. In John, O., Robins, R. and Pervin, L. (eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research. 3rd ed. (pp. 375–398). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, R. and Kreuz, R. (2015). Becoming fluent: How cognitive science can help adults learn a foreign language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Robinson, M., Watkins, E. and Harmon-Jones, E. (2013). Cognition and emotion: An introduction. In Robinson, M., Watkins, E. and Harmon-Jones, E. (eds.), Handbook of cognition and emotion (pp. 3–18). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Robinson, N. (2005). In defense of a psychometric approach to the definition of academic giftedness: A conservative view from a die-hard liberal. In Sternberg, R. and Davidson, J. (eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 280–294). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Robinson, P. (2002). Learning conditions, aptitude complexes and SLA. In Robinson, P. (ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 113–133). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Robson, D. (February 16, 2020). Fail productively: How to turn yourself into a super-learner. The Guardian. www.theguardian.com/science/2020/feb/16/neuroscience-become-a-super-learner-scientific-research-better-learning-long-term-memoryGoogle Scholar
Rodriguez-Fornells, A. (2019, February). The role of intrinsic reward and metacognition on language learning. Presentation at University of Maryland. College Park, MD.Google Scholar
Roever, K. (2013). Testing implicature under operational conditions. In Ross, S. and Kasper, G. (eds.), Assessing second language pragmatics (pp. 43–64). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Rogers, V., Meara, P., Barnett-Legh, T., Curry, C. and Davie, E. (2017). Examining the LLAMA aptitude tests. Journal of the European Second Language Association, 1, 49–60. https://doi.org/10.22599/jesla.24Google Scholar
Rong, M. (1999). Language learning strategies of a sample of tertiary-level students in the P.R. China. Guidelines, 21(1), 1–11.Google Scholar
Rosiers, A. and Eyckmans, J. (2017). Birds of a feather? A comparison of the personality profiles of aspiring interpreters and other language experts. Across Languages and Cultures, 18, 29–51.Google Scholar
Rota, G. and Reiterer, S. (2009). Cognitive aspects of pronunciation talent. In Dogil, G. and Reiterer, S. (eds.), Language talent and brain activity (pp. 67–96). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Rothbart, M. (2012). Advances in temperament: History, concepts and measures. In Zentner, M. and Shiner, R. (eds.), Handbook of temperament (pp. 3–20). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Rothbart, M., Sheese, B. and Conradt, E. (2009). Childhood temperament. In Corr, P. and Matthews, G. (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personality psychology (pp. 177–190). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rothbart, M., Sheese, B. and Posner, M. (2014). Temperament and emotion regulation. In Gross, J. (ed.), Handbook of emotion regulation (pp. 305–320). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Rubin, J. (1975). What the “good language learner” can teach us. TESOL Quarterly, 9, 41–51.Google Scholar
Rubin, J. (2008). Reflections. In Griffith, C.s, (ed.), Lessons from good language learners (pp. 10–15). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rubin, J. and Thompson, I. (1994). How to be a more successful language learner. 2nd ed. Boston: Heinle and Heinle.Google Scholar
Rueda, M. (2012). Effortful control. In Zentner, M. and Shiner, R. (eds.), Handbook of temperament (pp. 145–167). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Rueda, M., Posner, M. and Rothbart, M. (2011). Attentional control and self-regulation. In Vohs, K and Baumeister, R. (eds.), Handbook of self-regulation. 2nd ed. (pp. 284–299). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Runco, M. (2005). Creative giftedness. In Sternberg, R. and Davidson, J. (eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 295–311). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ruthsatz, J., Detterman, D., Griscom, W. and Collins, J. (2008). Becoming an expert in the musical domain: It takes more than just practice. Intelligence, 36, 330–338.Google Scholar
Ryan, S. and Irie, K. (2014). Imagined and possible selves: Stories we tell ourselves about ourselves. In Mercer, S. and Williams, M. (eds.), Multiple perspectives on the self in SLA (pp. 109–126). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Safar, A. and Kormos, J. (2008). Revisiting problems with foreign language aptitude. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching (IRAL), 46(2), 113–136.Google Scholar
Saffran, J. and Thiessen, E. (2009). Domain-general learning capacities. In Hoff, E. and Shatz, M. (eds.), Blackwell handbook of language development (pp. 68–86). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Saito, K., Dewaele, J-M., Abe, M. and In’nami, Y. (2018). Motivation, emotion, learning experience and second language comprehensibility development in classroom settings: A cross-sectional and longitudinal study. Language Learning, 68, 709–743.Google Scholar
Sampasivam, S. and Clément, R. (2014). The dynamics of second language confidence: Contact and interaction. In Mercer, S. and Williams, M. (eds.), Multiple perspectives on the self in SLA (pp. 23–40). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Sasaki, M. (1996). Second language proficiency, foreign language aptitude, and intelligence. New York, NY: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Saucier, G. (2009). Semantic and linguistic aspects of personality. In Corr, P. and Matthews, G. (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personality psychology (pp. 379–399). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sayler, M. (2009). Talent. In Kerr, B. (ed.), Encyclopedia of giftedness, creativity, and talent (p 865). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Schachter, J. (1996). Maturation and the issue of Universal Grammar in second language acquisition. In Ritchie, W. and Bhatia, T. (eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 159–193). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Scherer, K., Schorr, A. and Johnstone, T. (2001). Appraisal processes in emotion: Theory, methods and research. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schneiderman, E. and Desmarais, C. (1988a). The talented learner: Some preliminary findings. Second Language Research, 4, 91–109.Google Scholar
Schneiderman, E. and Desmarais, C. (1988b). A neuropsychological substrate for talent in second-language acquisition. In Obler, L. and Fein, D. (eds.), The exceptional brain: The neuropsychology of talent and special abilities (pp. 103–126). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Schultz, W. (2014). The psychobiography of genius. In Simonton, D. (ed.), The Wiley handbook of genius (pp. 20–32). Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Schumann, J. (1978). The pidginization process. A model for second language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Schumann, J. (1994). Where is cognition? Emotion and cognition in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 231–242.Google Scholar
Schumann, J. (1999). A neurobiological perspective on affect. In Arnold, J. (ed.), Affect in language learning (pp. 28–42). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schumann, J. (2004). The neurobiology of aptitude. In Schumann, J., Crowell, S., Jones, N., Lee, N., Schuchert, S. and Wood, L. (eds.), The neurobiology of learning perspectives from second language acquisition (pp. 7–22). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Schumann, J. and Wood, L. (2004). The neurobiology of motivation. In Schumann, J., Crowell, S., Jones, N., Lee, N., Schuchert, S. and Wood, L. (eds.), The neurobiology of learning perspectives from second language acquisition (pp. 23–42). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Scovel, T. (1988). A time to speak: A psycholinguistic inquiry into the critical period for human speech. New York, NY: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Searle, W. and Ward, C. (1990). The prediction of psychological and sociocultural adjustment during cross-cultural transitions. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 14(4), 449–464.Google Scholar
Segalowitz, N., Gatbonton, E. and Trofimovich, P. (2009). Links between ethnolinguistic affiliation, self-related motivation and second language fluency: Are they mediated by psycholinguistic variables? In Dörnyei, Z. and Ushioda, E., (eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 172–192). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Sereno, J. and Wang, Y. (2007). Behavioral and cortical effects of learning a second language. In Bohn, O. and Munro, M. (eds.), Language experience in second language speech learning (pp. 239–258). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Service, E. and Kohonen, V. (1995). Is the relation between phonological memory and foreign language learning accounted for by vocabulary acquisition? Applied Psycholinguistics, 16(2), 155–72.Google Scholar
Shah, J., Friedman, R. and Kruglanski, A. (2002). Forgetting all else: On the antecedents and consequences of goal shielding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1261–1280.Google Scholar
Shavinina, L. (2007). On the advancement of the expert performance approach via a deep understanding of giftedness. High Ability Studies, 18, 79–82.Google Scholar
Shavinina, L. (2009). A unique type of representation is the essence of giftedness: Towards a cognitive-developmental theory. In Shavinina, L. (ed.), International handbook on giftedness (pp. 231–257). New York, NY: Springer Science+Business Media.Google Scholar
Shavinina, L. and Ferrari, M. (2004). Extracognitive facets of developing high ability: Introduction to some important issues. In Shavinina, L. and Ferrari, M. (eds.), Beyond knowledge. Extracognitive aspects of developing high ability (pp. 3–12). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Shenk, D. (2010). The genius in all of us. New insights into genetics, talent and IQ. New York NY: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Shiner, R. (2018). Stability and change in emotion‐relevant personality traits in childhood and adolescence. In A. Fox, R. Lapate, A. Shackman and R. Davidson (eds.). The nature of emotion: Fundamental questions. 2nd ed. (pp. 379–381). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shoda, Y. and LeeTiernan, S. (2002). What remains invariant? Finding order within a person’s thoughts, feelings and behaviors across situations. In Cervone, D. and Mischel, W. (eds.), Advances in personality science (pp. 241–270). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Shweder, R. (1993). Everything you ever wanted to know about cognitive appraisal theory without being conscious of it. Psychological Inquiry, 4, 322–326.Google Scholar
Siegal, M. (1996). The role of learner subjectivity in second language sociolinguistic competency: Western women learning Japanese. Applied Linguistics, 17, 356–382.Google Scholar
Silverman, L. (2009). The measurement of giftedness. In Shavinina, L. (ed.), International handbook on giftedness (pp. 947–970). New York, NY: Springer Science+Business Media.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. (1994). Greatness: Who makes history and why. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. (2005). Genetics of giftedness: The implications of an Emergenic-Epigenetic Model. In Sternberg, R. and Davidson, J. (eds.), Conceptions of giftedness. 2nd ed. (pp. 312–326). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. (2014). Does genius science have a future history? In Simonton, D. (ed.), The Wiley handbook of genius (pp. 611–617). Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Singleton, D. (2000). Language and the lexicon. An introduction. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Singleton, D. and Leśniewska, J. (2012). Age and SLA: Research highways and bye-ways. In Pawlak, M. (ed.), New perspectives on individual differences in language learning and teaching (pp. 97–113). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
Singleton, D. and Ryan, L. (2004). Language acquisition: The age factor. 2nd ed. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Skehan, P. (2002). Theorising and updating aptitude. In Robinson, P. (ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 69–93). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Slevc, R. and Miyake, A. (2006). Individual differences in second language proficiency: Does musical ability matter? Psychological Science, 17, 675–681.Google Scholar
Smith, E. and Collins, E. (2010). Situated cognition. In Mesquita, B., Barrett, L. and Smith, E. (eds.), The mind in context (pp. 126–148). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Snow, C. and Hoefnagel-Hoehle, M. (1982). The critical period for language acquisition: Evidence from second language learning. In Krashen, S., Scarcella, R. and Long, M. (eds.), Child-adult differences in second language acquisition (pp. 93–111). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Snow, R. E. (1978). Theory and method for research on aptitude processes. Intelligence, 2, 225–278.Google Scholar
Sorace, A. (2003). Near-nativeness. In Doughty, C. and Long, M. (eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 130–151). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sparks, R., Patton, J., Ganschow, L. and Humbach, N. (2009). Long-term relationships among early first language skills, second language aptitude, second language affect, and later second language proficiency. Applied Psycholinguistics, 30, 725–755.Google Scholar
Stangor, C., Jonas, K., Stroebe, W. and Hewstone, M. (1996). Influence of student exchange on national stereotypes, attitudes and perceived group variability. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26(4), 663–675. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199607)26:43.0.CO; 2-6Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. (1993). The concept of giftedness: A Pentagonal Implicit theory. In Bock, G. (ed.), The origins and development of high ability. Cibo Foundation symposium 178 (pp. 5–21). West Sussex: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. (2002). The theory of successful intelligence and its implications for language aptitude testing. In Robinson, P. (ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 13–43). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. (2005). The WICS model of giftedness. In Sternberg, R. and Davidson, J. (eds.), Conceptions of giftedness. 2nd ed. (pp. 327–342). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. and Grigorenko, E. (2002). The theory of successful intelligence as a basis for gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 46, 265–277.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R., Jarvin, L. and Grigorenko, E. (2011). Explorations in giftedness. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stoeger, H. (2009). The history of giftedness research. In Shavinina, L. (ed.), International handbook on giftedness (pp. 17–38). New York, NY: Springer Science+Business Media.Google Scholar
Stowe, L. and Sabourin, L. (2005). Imaging the processing of a second language: Effects of maturation and proficiency on the neural processes involved. IRAL, 43, 329–353.Google Scholar
Stronkhorst, R. (2005). Learning outcomes of international mobility at two Dutch institutions of higher learning. Journal of Studies in International Education, 9, 292–315. DOI: 10.1177/1028315305280938Google Scholar
Subtirelu, N. (2014). A language ideological perspective on willingness to communicate. System, 42, 120–132.Google Scholar
Suri, G., Scheppes, G. and Gross, J. (2013). Emotion regulation and cognition. In Robinson, M., Watkins, E. and Harmon-Jones, E. (eds.), Handbook of cognition and emotion (pp. 195–209). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Sutin, A., Beason-Held, L., Resnick, S. and Costa, P. (2009). Sex differences in resting-state neural correlates of openness to experience among older adults. Cerebral Cortex, 19, 792–802.Google Scholar
Swain, M. (2010). “Talking it through”: Languaging as a source of learning. In Batstone, R. (ed.), Sociocognitive perspectives on language use and language learning (pp. 112–130). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Swann, W. and Bosson, J. (2008). Identity negotiation. A theory of self and social interaction. In John, O., Robins, R. and Pervin, L. (eds.), Handbook of personality. Theory and research (pp. 448–471). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Szmalec, A., Brysbaert, M. and Duyck, W. (2012). Working memory and (second) language processing. In Altarriba, J. and Isurin, L. (eds.), Memory, language and bilingualism: Theoretical and applied approaches (pp. 74–94). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Szyszka, M. (2020). Learners’ attitudes to first, second and third languages pronunciation in structuring multilingual identity. Applied Linguistics Review, July, 2020. DOI: 10.1515/applirev-2019-0061Google Scholar
Taguchi, N. and Li, X. (2017). Replication research in contextual and individual influences in pragmatic competence: Taguchi, Xiao and Li (2016) and Bardovi-Harlig and Bastos (2011). Language Teaching, 9, 1–13. DOI: 10.1017/S0261444817000222Google Scholar
Taguchi, N., Zhang, H. and Qiong, L. (2017). Pragmatic competence of heritage learners of Chinese and its relationship to social contact. Chinese as a Second Language Research Journal, 6, 7–37.Google Scholar
Takahashi, S. (2001). The role of input enhancement in developing pragmatic competence. In Rose, K. and Kasper, G., (eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching (pp. 171–199). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tees, R. and Werker, J. (1984). Perceptual flexibility: Maintenance or recovery of the ability to discriminate non-native speech sounds. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 38, 579–590.Google Scholar
Terman, L. (1925). Genetic studies of genius: Vol. 1. Mental and physical traits of a thousand gifted children. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Tesch, S. and Cameron, K. (1987). Openness to experience and development of adult identity. Journal of Personality, 55, 615–630.Google Scholar
Thompson, A. (2013). The interface of language aptitude and multilingualism: Reconsidering the bilingual/multilingual dichotomy. Modern Language Journal, 97, 685–701.Google Scholar
Thompson, I. (1991). Foreign accents revisited: The English pronunciation of Russian immigrants. Language Learning, 41, 177–204.Google Scholar
Thompson, L. (1993). Genetic contributions to intellectual development in infancy and childhood. In Vernon, P. (ed.), Biological approaches to the study of human intelligence (pp. 95–138). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Thompson, R. and Winer, A. (2013). The developmental polyphony of cognition and emotion. In Robinson, M., Watkins, E. and Harmon-Jones, E. (eds.), Handbook of cognition and emotion (pp. 293–311). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Thorne, A. and Nam, V. (2009). The storied construction of personality. In Corr, P. and Matthews, G. (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personality psychology (pp. 491–505). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tokuhama-Espinosa, T. (2003). The relationship between musical ability and foreign languages. In Tokuhama-Espinosa, T. (ed.), The multilingual mind (pp. 65–80). Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
Toohey, K. (2007). Conclusion: Autonomy/agency through socio-cultural lenses. In Barfield, A. and Brown, S. (eds.), Reconstructing autonomy in language education (pp. 231–242). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Towse, J. and Hitch, G. (2007). Variation in working memory due to normal development. In Conway, A., Jarrold, C., Kane, M., Miyake, A. and Towse, J. (eds.), Variation in working memory (pp. 109–133). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Treffers-Daller, J. (2016). Language dominance: The construct, its measurement, and operationalization. In Silva-Corvalán, C. and Treffers-Daller, J. (eds.), Language dominance in bilinguals. Issues of measurement and operationalization (pp. 235–265). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Trinder, M. (2017). The influence of level of extroversion, locus of control and gender on listening and reading proficiency in second language acquisition. Frankfurt, Germany: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Trofimovich, P., Martin-Chang, S. and Levesque, K. (2012). Age effects in L2 learning: Comparing child and adult learners’ performance on tests of implicit and explicit memory. In Altarriba, J. and Isurin, L. (eds.), Memory, language and bilingualism: Theoretical and applied approaches (pp. 161–187). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tsai, N., Au, J. and Jaeggi, S. (2016). Working memory, language processing, and implications of malleability for second language acquisition. In Granena, G., Jackson, D. and Yilmaz, Y. (eds.), Cognitive individual differences in second language processing and acquisition (pp. 69–88). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Ullman, M. (2005). A cognitive neuroscience perspective on second language acquisition: The declarative/procedural model. In Sanz, C. (ed.), Mind and context in adult second language acquisition (pp. 141–178). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Unsworth, S. (2009). First and second language development from a UG perspective. In de Bot, K. and Schrauf, R. (eds.), Language development over the lifespan (pp. 19–39). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Unsworth, S. (2016). Amount of exposure as a proxy for dominance in bilingual language acquisition. In Silva-Corvalán, C. and Treffers-Daller, J. (eds.), Language dominance in bilinguals. Issues of measurement and operationalization (pp. 156–173). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ushioda, E. (2009). A person-in-context relational view of emergent motivation, self and identity. In Dörnyei, Z. and Ushioda, E., (eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 215–228). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Ushioda, E. (2012). Motivation: L2 learning as a special case? In Mercer, S., Ryan, S. and Williams, M. (eds.), Psychology for language learning: Insights from research, theory and practice (pp. 58–73). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Ushioda, E. (2014). Motivational perspectives on the self in SLA: A developmental view. In Mercer, S. and Williams, M. (eds.), Multiple perspectives on the self in SLA (pp. 127–141). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Valdés, G. (2003). Expanding definitions of giftedness. The case of young interpreters from immigrant communities. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Van Daele, S., Housen, A., Pierrard, M. and Debruyn, L. (2006). The effect of extraversion on oral L2 proficiency. EUROSLA Yearbook, 6, 213–236.Google Scholar
Van der Zee, K. and Van Oudenhoven, J-P. (2000). The Multicultural Personality Questionnaire: A multidimensional instrument of multicultural effectiveness. European Journal of Personality, 14(4), 291–309.Google Scholar
Van der Zee, K. and Van Oudenhoven, J-P. (2001). The Multicultural Personality Questionnaire: Reliability and validity of self- and other ratings of multicultural effectiveness. Journal of Research in Personality, 35, 278–288.Google Scholar
Vann, R. and Abraham, R. (1990). Strategies of unsuccessful language learners. TESOL Quarterly, 24(2), 177–198.Google Scholar
VanTassel-Baska, J. (2005). Domain-specific giftedness: Applications in school and life. In Sternberg, R. and Davidson, J. (eds.), Conceptions of giftedness. 2nd ed. (pp. 358–376). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Verhoeven, L. and Vermeer, A. (2002). Communicative competence and personality dimensions in first and second language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 23(3), 361–374.Google Scholar
Véronique, G. (2013). Socialization. In Herschensohn, J. and Young-Scholten, M. (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 251–271). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Victori, M. and Tragant, E. (2003). Learner strategies: A cross-sectional and longitudinal study of primary and high school EFL learners. In Garcia Mayo, M. and Garcia Lecumberri, M. (eds.), Age and the acquisition of English as a foreign language (pp. 182–209). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Vinkhuyzen, A., van der Sluis, S., Posthuma, D. and Boomsma, D. (2009). The heritability of aptitude and exceptional talent across different domains in adolescents and young adults. Behavioral Genetics, 39, 380–392.Google Scholar
Vogt, W-P. (2005). Dictionary of statistics and methodology. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Walters, J. and Gardner, H. (1984). The crystallizing experience: Discovering an intellectual gift. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Project Zero.Google Scholar
Watanabe, S., Tareq, M. and Kanazawa, Y. (2011). When openness to experience and conscientiousness affect continuous learning: A mediating role of intrinsic motivation and a moderating role of occupation. Japanese Psychological Research, 53, 1–14.Google Scholar
Waterhouse, L. (1988). Speculations on the neuroanatomical substrate of special talents. In Obler, L. and Fein, D. (eds.), The exceptional brain: Neuropsychology of talent and special abilities (pp. 493–512). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Watson-Gegeo, K. and Nielsen, S. (2003). Language socialization in SLA. In Doughty, C. and Long, M. (eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 155–177). Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Weinberg, A., Ferri, J. and Hajcak, G. (2013). Interactions between attention and emotion. In Robinson, M., Watkins, E. and Harmon-Jones, E. (eds.), Handbook of cognition and emotion (pp. 35–54). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Weinstein, C. and Mayer, R. (1986). The teaching of learning strategies. In Wittrock, M. (ed.), Handbook of research on teaching. 3rd ed. (pp. 315–327). New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Weisberg, R. (2016). Case studies of genius. In Simonton, D. (ed.), The Wiley handbook of genius (pp. 109–119). Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wen, Z. (2016). Working memory and second language learning. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Wen, Z., Biedroń, A. and Skehan, P. (2017). Foreign language aptitude theory: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. Language Teaching, 50, 1–31.Google Scholar
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wesche, M. and Schneiderman, E. (1982). Language lateralization in adult bilinguals. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 4, 153–169.Google Scholar
White, G. (2008). Listening and good language learners. In Griffiths, C., (ed.), Lessons from good language learners (pp. 208–217). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
White, L. (2003). Second language acquisition and universal grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
White, L. and Genesee, F. (1996). How native is near-native? The issue of ultimate attainment in adult second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 12, 233–265.Google Scholar
Williams, C. and Johnson, L. (2011). Why can’t we be friends? Multicultural attitudes and friendships with international students. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 35, 41–48.Google Scholar
Winke, P. (2013). An investigation into second language aptitude for advanced Chinese language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 97(1), 109–130. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2013.01428.xGoogle Scholar
Winkielman, P. and Kavanagh, L. (2013). The embodied perspective on cognition-emotion interactions. In Robinson, M., Watkins, E. and Harmon-Jones, E. (eds.), Handbook of cognition and emotion (pp. 213–230). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Winne, P. (1995). Inherent details in self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 30, 173–187.Google Scholar
Woltz, D. (2003). Implicit cognitive processes as aptitudes for learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(2), 95–104. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3802_4Google Scholar
Wong, P., Chan, A. and Margulis, E. (2012). Effects of mono- and bicultural experiences on auditory perception. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1252(1), 158–162. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2012.06407.xGoogle Scholar
Wong, P., Jin, J., Gunasekera, G., Abel, R., Lee, E. and Dhar, S. (2009). Aging and cortical mechanisms of speech perception in noise. Neuropsychologia, 47(3), 693–703. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.11.032Google Scholar
Wong, P., Perrachione, T. and Parrish, T. (2007). Neural characteristics of successful and less successful speech and word learning in adults. Human Brain Mapping, 28(10), 995–1006. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.20330Google Scholar
Yang, J., Gates, K., Molenaar, P. and Li, P. (2015). Neural changes underlying successful second language word learning. An fMRI study. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 33, 29–49.Google Scholar
Yashima, T. (2009). International posture and the ideal L2 self in the Japanese EFL context. In Dörnyei, Z. and Ushioda, E., (eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 144–163). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Yeni-Komshian, G., Flege, J. and Liu, S. (2000). Pronunciation proficiency in the first and second languages of Korean-English bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 3, 131–149.Google Scholar
Yiend, J. (2010). The effects of emotion on attention: A review of attentional processing of emotional information. In DeHouwer, J. and Hermans, D. (eds.), Cognition and emotion. Reviews of current research and theories (pp. 211–275). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Yiend, J., Barnicot, K. and Koster, E. (2013). Attention and emotion. In Robinson, M., Watkins, E. and Harmon-Jones, E. (eds.), Handbook of cognition and emotion (pp. 97–116). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Young, R. (2009). Discursive practice in language learning and teaching. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Zajonc, R. (1980). Feeling and thinking. Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35, 151–175.Google Scholar
Zarrinabadi, N. (2014). Communicating in a second language: Investigating the effect of teacher on learners’ willingness to communicate. System, 42, 288–295.Google Scholar
Zentner, M. and Shiner, R. (2012). Fifty years of progress in temperament research. A synthesis of major themes, findings, and challenges and a look forward. In Zentner, M. and Shiner, R. (eds.), Handbook of temperament (pp. 673–700). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Ziegler, A. (2009). Research on giftedness in the 21st century. In Shavinina, L. (ed.), International handbook on giftedness (pp. 1509–1524). New York, NY: Springer Science+Business Media.Google Scholar
Ziegler, A. and Heller, K. (2000). Conceptions of giftedness from a meta-theoretical perspective. In Heller, K. (ed.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (pp. 3–21). 2nd ed. Oxford: Elsevier Science and Technology.Google Scholar