Arneitz, P., Leonhardt, R., Schnepp, E., Heilig, B., Mayrhofer, F., Kovacs, P., Hejda, P., Valach, F., Vadasz, G., Hammerl, C. et al. The histmag database: combining historical, archaeomagnetic and volcanic data. Geophys. J. Int., 210(3):1347–59, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aubert, J.. Earth’s core internal dynamics 1840–2010 imaged by inverse geodynamo modelling. Geophys. J. Int., 197(3):1321–34, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aubert, J.. Geomagnetic forecasts driven by thermal wind dynamics in the Earth’s core. Geophys. J. Int., 203(3): 1738–51, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aubert, J., Amit, H., Hulot, G. and Olson, P.. Thermochemical flows couple the Earth’s inner core growth to mantle heterogeneity. Nature, 454(7205):758, 2008.Google Scholar

Aubert, J., Finlay, C. C. and Fournier, A.. Bottom-up control of geomagnetic secular variation by the Earth’s inner core. Nature, 502(7470):219, 2013.Google Scholar

Aubert, J., Gastine, T. and Fournier, A.. Spherical convective dynamos in the rapidly rotating asymptotic regime. J. Fluid Mech., 813:558–93, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baerenzung, J., Holschneider, M. and Lesur, V.. The flow at the Earth’s core-mantle boundary under weak prior constraints. J. Geophys. Res., 121(3): 1343–64, 2016.Google Scholar

Baerenzung, J., Holschneider, M., Wicht, J., Sanchez, S. and Lesur, V.. Modeling and predicting the short term evolution of the geomagnetic field. arXiv preprint arXiv:1710.06188, 2017.Google Scholar

Bardsley, O. and Davidson, P. A.. Inertial–Alfvén waves as columnar helices in planetary cores. J. Fluid Mech., 805, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barrois, O., Gillet, N. and Aubert, J.. Contributions to the geomagnetic secular variation from a reanalysis of core surface dynamics. Geophys. J. Int., 211(1):50–68, 2017.Google Scholar

Barrois, O., Hammer, M., Finlay, C., Martin, Y., & Gillet, N., 2018. Assimilation of ground and satellite magnetic measurements: inference of core surface magnetic and velocity field changes, Geophys. J. Int., 215(1), 695–712.Google Scholar

Beggan, C. and Whaler, K.. Forecasting secular variation using core flows. Earth Planets Space, 62(10):11, 2010.Google Scholar

Bloxham, J.. Simple models of fluid flow at the core surface derived from geomagnetic field models. Geophys. J. Int., 99(1):173–82, 1989.Google Scholar

Bloxham, J. and Jackson, A.. Time-dependent mapping of the magnetic field at the core-mantle boundary. J. Geophys. Res., 97(B13):19537–63, 1992.Google Scholar

Bouligand, C., Gillet, N., Jault, D., Schaeffer, N., Fournier, A. and Aubert, J.. Frequency spectrum of the geomagnetic field harmonic coefficients from dynamo simulations. Geophys. J. Int., 2016.Google Scholar

Braginsky, S. I.. Torsional magnetohydrodynamic vibrations in the Earth’s core and variations in day length. Geomag. Aeron., 10:1–8, 1970.Google Scholar

Braginsky, S. I.. MAC-oscillations of the hidden ocean of the core. J. Geomag. Geoelec., 45(11–12):1517–38, 1993.Google Scholar

Braginsky, S. I.. Dynamics of the stably stratified ocean at the top of the core. Phys. Earth Planet. Int., 111(1): 21–34, 1999.Google Scholar

Brodholt, J. and Badro, J.. Composition of the low seismic velocity E’ layer at the top of Earth’s core. Geophys. Res. Lett., 2017.Google Scholar

Brown, M. C., Donadini, F., Korte, M., Nilsson, A., Korhonen, K., Lodge, A., Lengyel, S. N. and Constable, C. G.. GEOMAGIA50. v3: 1. general structure and modifications to the archeological and volcanic database. Earth Planets Space, 67(1):83, 2015.Google Scholar

Buffett, B.. Geomagnetic fluctuations reveal stable stratification at the top of the Earth’s core. Nature, 507(7493): 484, 2014.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Buffett, B. and Matsui, H.. A power spectrum for the geomagnetic dipole moment. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 411: 20–26, 2015.Google Scholar

Buffett, B., Mathews, P. and Herring, T.. Modeling of nutation and precession: Effects of electromagnetic coupling. J. Geophys. Res.: Solid Earth, 107(B4), 2002.Google Scholar

Buffett, B., Knezek, N. and Holme, R.. Evidence for MAC waves at the top of Earth’s core and implications for variations in length of day. Geophys. J. Int., 204(3): 1789–1800, 2016.Google Scholar

Calkins, M. A., Julien, K. and Marti, P.. Three-dimensional quasi-geostrophic convection in the rotating cylindrical annulus with steeply sloping endwalls. J. Fluid Mech., 732:214–44, 2013.Google Scholar

Canet, E., Fournier, A. and Jault, D.. Forward and adjoint quasi-geostrophic models of the geomagnetic secular variation. J. Geophys. Res., 114(B11), 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Canet, E., Finlay, C. and Fournier, A.. Hydromagnetic quasi-geostrophic modes in rapidly rotating planetary cores. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 229:1–15, 2014.Google Scholar

Cardin, P. and Olson, P.. Experiments on core dynamics. In Treatise on Geophysics, 2nd edn. Elsevier BV, Amsterdam, pages 317–39, 2015.Google Scholar

Chao, B. F., Chung, W., Shih, Z. and Hsieh, Y.. Earth’s rotation variations: A wavelet analysis. Terra Nova, 26 (4):260–64, 2014.Google Scholar

Christensen, U. R. and Wicht, J.. Models of magnetic field generation in partly stable planetary cores: Applications to Mercury and Saturn. Icarus, 196(1):16–34, 2008.Google Scholar

Christensen, U. R., Aubert, J. and Hulot, G.. Conditions for Earth-like geodynamo models. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 296(3):487–96, 2010.Google Scholar

Chulliat, A. and Maus, S.. Geomagnetic secular acceleration, jerks, and a localized standing wave at the core surface from 2000 to 2010. J. Geophys. Res., 119(3):1531–43, 2014.Google Scholar

Chulliat, A., Alken, P. and Maus, S.. Fast equatorial waves propagating at the top of the Earth’s core. Geophys. Res. Lett., 42(9):3321–9, 2015.Google Scholar

Constable, C. G. and Johnson, C.. A paleomagnetic power spectrum. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 153:61–73, 2005.Google Scholar

Constable, C. G. and Korte, M.. Centennial to millennialscale geomagnetic field variations. In Treatise on Geophysics, 2nd edn., Elsevier BV, Amsterdam, pages 309–41. 2015.Google Scholar

De Santis, A., Barraclough, D. and Tozzi, R.. Spatial and temporal spectra of the geomagnetic field and their scaling properties. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 135:125–34, 2003.Google Scholar

Dormy, E., Oruba, L. and Petitdemange, L.. Three branches of dynamo action. Fluid Dyn. Res., 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Finlay, C., Lesur, V., Thèbault, E., Vervelidou, F., Morschhauser, A. and Shore, R.. Challenges handling magnetospheric and ionospheric signals in internal geomagnetic field modelling. Space Sci. Rev., 206(1–4):157–89, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Finlay, C. C.. Course 8 waves in the presence of magnetic fields, rotation and convection. Les Houches, 88:403–50, 2008.Google Scholar

Finlay, C. C. and Jackson, A.. Equatorially dominated magnetic field change at the surface of Earth’s core. Science, 300(5628):2084–6, 2003.Google Scholar

Finlay, C. C., Olsen, N., Kotsiaros, S., Gillet, N. and Tøffner-Clausen, L.. Recent geomagnetic secular variation from Swarm. Earth Planets Space, 68(1):1–18, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fournier, A., Hulot, G., Jault, D., Kuang, W., Tangborn, A., Gillet, N., Canet, E., Aubert, J. and Lhuillier, F.. An introduction to data assimilation and predictability in geomagnetism. Space Sci. Rev., 155(1–4):247–91, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fournier, A., Aubert, J. and Thèbault, E.. Inference on core surface flow from observations and 3-D dynamo modelling. Geophys. J. Int., 186(1):118–36, 2011.Google Scholar

Fournier, A., Nerger, L. and Aubert, J.. An ensemble Kalman filter for the time-dependent analysis of the geomagnetic field. Geophys. Geochem. Geosyst., 14(10): 4035–43, 2013.Google Scholar

Fournier, A., Aubert, J. and Thèbault, E.. A candidate secular variation model for IGRF-12 based on swarm data and inverse geodynamo modelling. Earth Planets Space, 67(1):1–17, 2015.Google Scholar

Garcia, F., Oruba, L. and Dormy, E.. Equatorial symmetry breaking and the loss of dipolarity in rapidly rotating dynamos. Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn., 1–14, 2017.Google Scholar

Genevey, A., Gallet, Y., Jesset, S., Thèbault, E., Bouillon, J., Lefèvre, A. and Le Goff, M.. New archeointensity data from french early medieval pottery production (6th–10th century ad). Tracing 1500 years of geomagnetic field intensity variations in Western Europe. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 257:205–19, 2016.Google Scholar

Gillet, N., Jault, D., Canet, E. and Fournier, A.. Fast torsional waves and strong magnetic field within the Earth’s core. Nature, 465(7294):74, 2010.Google Scholar

Gillet, N., Schaeffer, N. and Jault, D.. Rationale and geophysical evidence for quasi-geostrophic rapid dynamics within the Earth’s outer core. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 187:380–90, 2011.Google Scholar

Gillet, N., Jault, D., Finlay, C. C. and Olsen, N.. Stochastic modelling of the Earth’s magnetic field: inversion for covariances over the observatory era. Geophys. Geochem. Geosyst., 14:766–86, 2013.Google Scholar

Gillet, N., Barrois, O. and Finlay, C. C.. Stochastic forecasting of the geomagnetic field from the COV-OBS.x1 geomagnetic field model, and candidate models for IGRF-12. Earth Planets Space, 67(1):71, 2015a.Google Scholar

Gillet, N., Jault, D. and Finlay, C.. Planetary gyre, time-dependent eddies, torsional waves, and equatorial jets at the Earth’s core surface. J. Geophys. Res., 120(6):3991–4013, 2015b.Google Scholar

Gillet, N., Jault, D. and Canet, E.. Excitation of traveling torsional normal modes in an Earth’s core model. Geophys. J. Int., 2017.Google Scholar

Gubbins, D., Willis, A. P. and Sreenivasan, B.. Correlation of Earth’s magnetic field with lower mantle thermal and seismic structure. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 162(3):256–60, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Helffrich, G. and Kaneshima, S.. Outer-core compositional stratification from observed core wave speed profiles. Nature, 468(7325):807, 2010.Google Scholar

Hellio, G. and Gillet, N.. Geomagnetic field changes over the past three millennia, and their uncertainties. Geophys. J. Int., submitted, 2018.Google Scholar

Hide, R.. Free hydromagnetic oscillations of the Earth’s core and the theory of the geomagnetic secular variation. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London A, 259(1107):615–47, 1966.Google Scholar

Holme, R.. Electromagnetic core-mantle coupling II: Probing deep mantle conductance. In The Core-Mantle Boundary Region, American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC, pages 139–51, 1998.Google Scholar

Holschneider, M., Lesur, V., Mauerberger, S. and Baerenzung, J.. Correlation-based modeling and separation of geomagnetic field components. J. Geophys. Res., 121(5):3142–60, 2016.Google Scholar

Hori, K., Teed, R. and Jones, C.. The dynamics of magnetic Rossby waves in spherical dynamo simulations: A signature of strong-field dynamos? Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jackson, A. and Finlay, C.. Geomagnetic secular variation and its applications to the core. In Treatise on Geophysics, 2nd edn., Elsevier BV, Amsterdam, pages 137–84, 2015.Google Scholar

Jackson, A., Jonkers, A. R. T. and Walker, M. R.. Four centuries of geomagnetic secular variation from historical records. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London A, 358:957–90, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jault, D.. Axial invariance of rapidly varying diffusionless motions in the Earth’s core interior. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 166(1):67–76, 2008.Google Scholar

Jault, D.. Illuminating the electrical conductivity of the lowermost mantle from below. Geophys. J. Inter., 202:482–96, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jault, D. and Finlay, C.. Waves in the core and mechanical core-mantle interactions. In Treatise on Geophysics, 2nd edn., Elsevier BV, Amsterdam, pages 225–45, 2015.Google Scholar

Jones, C.. Thermal and compositional convection in the outer core. In Treatise on Geophysics, 2nd edn., Elsevier BV, Amsterdam, pages 115–59, 2015.Google Scholar

Jonkers, A. R., Jackson, A. and Murray, A.. Four centuries of geomagnetic data from historical records. Rev. Geophys., 41(2), 2003.Google Scholar

Kageyama, A., Miyagoshi, T. and Sato, T.. Formation of current coils in geodynamo simulations. Nature, 454(7208):1106, 2008.Google Scholar

Konȏpková, Z., McWilliams, R. S., Gómez-Pèrez, N. and Goncharov, A. F.. Direct measurement of thermal conductivity in solid iron at planetary core conditions. Nature, 534:99–101, 2016.Google Scholar

Korte, M. and Constable, C.. Improving geomagnetic field reconstructions for 0–3 ka. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 188:247–59, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kuang, W. and Tangborn, A.. Dynamic responses of the Earth’s outer core to assimilation of observed geomagnetic secular variation. Prog. Earth Planet. Sci., 2(1):40, 2015.Google Scholar

Kuang, W., Tangborn, A., Wei, Z. and Sabaka, T.. Constraining a numerical geodynamo model with 100 years of surface observations. Geophys. J. Int., 179(3):1458–68, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kuang, W., Wei, Z., Holme, R. and Tangborn, A.. Prediction of geomagnetic field with data assimilation: a candidate secular variation model for IGRF-11. Earth Planets Space, 62(10):7, 2010.Google Scholar

Labbé, F., Jault, D. and Gillet, N.. On magnetostrophic inertialess waves in quasi-geostrophic models of planetary cores. Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn., 109(6):587–610, 2015.Google Scholar

Le Bars, M., Cèbron, D. and Le Gal, P.. Flows driven by libration, precession, and tides. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech., 47:163–93, 2015.Google Scholar

Lesur, V., Wardinski, I., Hamoudi, M. and Rother, M.. The second generation of the GFZ reference internal magnetic model: GRIMM-2. Earth Planets Space, 62(10):6, 2010.Google Scholar

Lesur, V., Heumez, B., Telali, A., Lalanne, X. and Soloviev, A.. Estimating error statistics for Chambonla-Forêt observatory definitive data. Ann. Geophys., 35:939, 2017a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lesur, V., Wardinski, I., Baerenzung, J. and Holschneider, M.. On the frequency spectra of the core magnetic field gauss coefficients. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 2017b.Google Scholar

Lhuillier, F., Aubert, J. and Hulot, G.. Earth’s dynamo limit of predictability controlled by magnetic dissipation. Geophys. J. Int., 186(2):492–508, 2011.Google Scholar

Licht, A., Hulot, G., Gallet, Y. and Thèbault, E.. Ensembles of low degree archeomagnetic field models for the past three millennia. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 224:38–67, 2013.Google Scholar

Liu, D., Tangborn, A. and Kuang, W.. Observing system simulation experiments in geomagnetic data assimilation. J. Geophys. Res., 112(B8), 2007.Google Scholar

Livermore, P. W., Ierley, G. and Jackson, A.. The evolution of a magnetic field subject to taylor s constraint using a projection operator. Geophys. J. Int., 187(2):690–704, 2011.Google Scholar

Macmillan, S. and Olsen, N.. Observatory data and the Swarm mission. Earth Planets Space, 65(11):15, 2013.Google Scholar

Maffei, S. and Jackson, A.. Kinematic validation of a quasigeostrophic model for the fast dynamics in the Earth’s outer core. Geophys. J. Int., 2017.Google Scholar

Malkus, W. V.. Hydromagnetic planetary waves. J. Fluid Mech., 28(4):793–802, 1967.Google Scholar

Mandea, M. and Olsen, N.. A new approach to directly determine the secular variation from magnetic satellite observations. Geophys. Res. Lett., 33(15), 2006.Google Scholar

Mandea, M., Holme, R., Pais, A., Pinheiro, K., Jackson, A. and Verbanac, G.. Geomagnetic jerks: Rapid core field variations and core dynamics. Space Sci. Rev., 155(1):147–75, 2010.Google Scholar

Meduri, D. G. and Wicht, J.. A simple stochastic model for dipole moment fluctuations in numerical dynamo simulations. Frontiers Earth Sci., 4:38, 2016.Google Scholar

Nataf, H.-C. and Schaeffer, N.. Turbulence in the core. In Treatise on Geophysics, 2nd edn., Elsevier BV, Amsterdam, pages 161–81. 2015.Google Scholar

Nilsson, A., Muscheler, R. and Snowball, I.. Millennial scale cyclicity in the geodynamo inferred from a dipole tilt reconstruction. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 311(3):299–305, 2011.Google Scholar

Ohta, K., Kuwayama, Y., Hirose, K., Shimizu, K. and Ohishi, Y.. Experimental determination of the electrical resistivity of iron at Earth’s core conditions. Nature, 534(7605):95–8, 2016.Google Scholar

Oke, P. R., Sakov, P. and Corney, S. P.. Impacts of localisation in the enkf and enoi: experiments with a small model. Ocean Dyn., 57(1):32–45, 2007.Google Scholar

Olsen, N. and Kotsiaros, S.. The geomagnetic field gradient tensor, properties and parametrization in terms of spherical harmonics. Int. J. Geomath., 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Olsen, N., Glassmeier, K.-H. and Jia, X.. Separation of the magnetic field into external and internal parts. Space Sci. Rev., 152(1–4):135–57, 2010.Google Scholar

Olsen, N., Lühr, H., Finlay, C. C., Sabaka, T. J., Michaelis, I., Rauberg, J. and Tøffner-Clausen., L. The CHAOS-4 geomagnetic field model. Geophys. J. Int., 197(2):815–27, 2014.Google Scholar

Olson, P., Christensen, U. and Driscoll, P.. From superchrons to secular variation: A broadband dynamo frequency spectrum for the geomagnetic dipole. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 319–20:75–82, 2012.Google Scholar

Olson, P., Landeau, M. and Reynolds, E.. Dynamo tests for stratification below the core-mantle boundary. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 271:1–18, 2017.Google Scholar

Pais, M. and Jault, D.. Quasi-geostrophic flows responsible for the secular variation of the Earth’s magnetic field. Geophys. J. Int., 173(2):421–43, 2008.Google Scholar

Panovska, S., Finlay, C. and Hirt, A.. Observed periodicities and the spectrum of field variations in Holocene magnetic records. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 379:88–94, 2013.Google Scholar

Panovska, S., Korte, M., Finlay, C. and Constable, C.. Limitations in paleomagnetic data and modelling techniques and their impact on holocene geomagnetic field models. Geophys. J. Int., 202(1):402–18, 2015.Google Scholar

Pavón-Carrasco, F. J., Osete, M. L., Torta, J. M. and De Santis, A.. A geomagnetic field model for the holocene based on archaeomagnetic and lava flow data. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 388:98–109, 2014.Google Scholar

Pozzo, M., Davies, C., Gubbins, D. and Alfe`, D.. Thermal and electrical conductivity of iron at Earth’s core conditions. Nature, 485(7398):355–58, 2012.Google Scholar

Roberts, P. H. and Wu, C.-C.. On the modified taylor constraint. Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn., 108(6):696–715, 2014.Google Scholar

Sabaka, T. J., Olsen, N. and Purucker, M. E.. Extending comprehensive models of the earth’s magnetic field with Ørsted and CHAMP data. Geophys. J. Int., 159(2): 521–47, 2004.Google Scholar

Sabaka, T. J., Hulot, G. and Olsen, N.. Mathematical properties relevant to geomagnetic field modeling. In Handbook of Geomathematics, Springer, pages 503–38, 2010.Google Scholar

Sabaka, T. J., Olsen, N., Tyler, R. H. and Kuvshinov, A.. Cm5, a pre-swarm comprehensive geomagnetic field model derived from over 12 yr of CHAMP, Ørsted, SAC-C and observatory data. Geophys. J. Int., 200(3):1596–1626, 2015.Google Scholar

Sakuraba, A. and Roberts, P. H.. Generation of a strong magnetic field using uniform heat flux at the surface of the core. Nat. Geosci., 2(11):802–5, 2009.Google Scholar

Sanchez, S.. Assimilation of geomagnetic data into dynamo models, an archeomagnetic study. PhD thesis, Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris, 2016.Google Scholar

Sanchez, S., Fournier, A., Aubert, J., Cosme, E. and Gallet, Y.. Modelling the archaeomagnetic field under spatial constraints from dynamo simulations: a resolution analysis. Geophys. J. Int., 207:983–1002, 2016.Google Scholar

Schaeffer, N. and Jault, D.. Electrical conductivity of the lowermost mantle explains absorption of core torsional waves at the equator. Geophys. Res. Lett., 43(10):4922–8, 2016.Google Scholar

Schaeffer, N., Jault, D., Nataf, H.-C. and Fournier, A.. Turbulent geodynamo simulations: A leap towards Earth’s core. Geophys. J. Int., 211(1):1–29, 2017.Google Scholar

Soderlund, K. M., King, E. M. and Aurnou, J. M.. The influence of magnetic fields in planetary dynamo models. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 333:9–20, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Soloviev, A., Chulliat, A. and Bogoutdinov, S.. Detection of secular acceleration pulses from magnetic observatory data. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 270:128–42, 2017.Google Scholar

Sreenivasan, B. and Jones, C. A.. Helicity generation and subcritical behaviour in rapidly rotating dynamos. J. Fluid Mech., 688:5, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Takehiro, S.-I.. Penetration of Alfvèn waves into an upper stably-stratified layer excited by magnetoconvection in rotating spherical shells. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 241:37–43, 2015.Google Scholar

Takehiro, S.-I. and Lister, J. R.. Penetration of columnar convection into an outer stably stratified layer in rapidly rotating spherical fluid shells. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 187(3):357–66, 2001.Google Scholar

Takehiro, S.-I. and Sasaki, Y.. Penetration of steady fluid motions into an outer stable layer excited by MHD thermal convection in rotating spherical shells. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 2017.Google Scholar

Tangborn, A. and Kuang, W.. Geodynamo model and error parameter estimation using geomagnetic data assimilation. Geophys. J. Int., 200(1):664–75, 2015.Google Scholar

Taylor, J.. The magneto-hydrodynamics of a rotating fluid and the Earth’s dynamo problem. Proc. R. Soc. London A, 274(1357):274–83, 1963.Google Scholar

Teed, R. J., Jones, C. A. and Tobias, S. M.. The transition to Earth-like torsional oscillations in magnetoconvection simulations. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 419:22–31, 2015.Google Scholar

Thomson, A. W. and Lesur, V.. An improved geomagnetic data selection algorithm for global geomagnetic field modelling. Geophys. J. Int., 169(3):951–63, 2007.Google Scholar

Tøffner-Clausen, L., Lesur, V., Olsen, N. and Finlay, C. C.. In-flight scalar calibration and characterisation of the Swarm magnetometry package. Earth Planets Space, 68(1):129, 2016.Google Scholar

Turner, G., Rasson, J. and Reeves, C.. Observation and measurement techniques. In Treatise on Geophysics, 2nd edn., Elsevier BV, Amsterdam, pages 91–135, 2015.Google Scholar

Velímskỳ, J.. Electrical conductivity in the lower mantle: Constraints from CHAMP satellite data by time-domain em induction modelling. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 180(3):111–17, 2010.Google Scholar

Vidal, J. and Schaeffer, N.. Quasi-geostrophic modes in the Earth’s fluid core with an outer stably stratified layer. Geophys. J. Int., 202(3):2182–93, 2015.Google Scholar

Walker, M., Barenghi, C. and Jones, C.. A note on dynamo action at asymptotically small ekman number. Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn., 88(1–4):261–75, 1998.Google Scholar

Yadav, R. K., Gastine, T., Christensen, U. R., Wolk, S. J. and Poppenhaeger, K.. Approaching a realistic force balance in geodynamo simulations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113(43):12065–70, 2016.Google Scholar

Besse, J. & Courtillot, V. (2002), ‘Apparent and true polar wander and the geometry of the geomagnetic field over the last 200 myr’, J. Geophys. Res. B11(107).Google Scholar

Blakely, R. (1995), Potentiel Theory in Gravity and Magnetic Applications, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Bouligand, C., Glen, J. & Blakely, R. (2009), ‘Mapping curie temperature depth in the western united states with a fractal model for crustal magnetization’, J. Geophys. Res. 114, B11104.Google Scholar

Catalán, M., Dyment, J., Lesur, V., Thébault, E., Hamoudi, M., Choi, Y., Santis, A. D., Takemi, I., Korhonen, J., Litvinova, T., Luís, J., Meyer, B., Milligan, P., Masao, N., Okuma, S., Pilkington, M., Purucker, M., Ravat, D., Gaina, C., Maus, S., Quesnel, Y., Saltus, R. & Taylor, P. (2016), ‘Making a better magnetic map’, EOS 97.Google Scholar

Counil, J.-L., Cohen, Y. & Achache, J. (1991), ‘A global continent-ocean magnetization contrast: spherical harmonic analysis’, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 103, 354–64.Google Scholar

Dyment, J. & Arkani-Hamed, J. (1998), ‘Contribution of lithospheric remanent magnetization to satellite magnetic anomalies over the world’s oceans’, J. Geophys. Res. 103, 15423–42.Google Scholar

Dyment, J., Choi, Y., Hamoudi, M., Lesur, V. & Thébault, E. (2015), ‘Global equivalent magnetization of the oceanic lithosphere’, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 430, 54‒65.Google Scholar

Fox Maule, C., Purucker, M. E., Olsen, N. & Mosegaard, K. (2005), ‘Heat flux anomalies in Antarctica revealed by satellite magnetic data’, Science 309, 464‒67.Google Scholar

Fox Maule, C., Purucker, M. & Olsen, N. (2005), ‘The magnetic crustal thickness of Greenland’, in Reigber, C., Lhr, H., Schwintzer, P. & Wickert, J., eds., Earth Observation with CHAMP, Results from Three Years in Orbit, Springer.Google Scholar

Gubbins, D., Ivers, D., Masterton, S. M. & Winch, D. E. (2011), ‘Analysis of lithospheric magnetization in vector spherical harmonics’, Geophys. J. Int. 187, 99‒117.Google Scholar

Gubbins, D., Ivers, D. & Williams, S. (2017), ‘Analysis of regional crustal magnetization in vector cartesian harmonics’, Geophys. J. Int. 211, 1285–95.Google Scholar

Hamoudi, M., Thébault, E., Lesur, V. & Mandea, M. (2007), ‘Geoforschungszentrum anomaly magnetic map (gamma): A candidate model for the world digital magnetic anomaly map’, Geochem Geophys. Geosyst. 8.Google Scholar

Hemant, K., Thébault, E., Mandea, M., Ravat, D. & Maus, S. (2007), ‘Magnetic anomaly map of the world: merging satellite, airborne, marine and ground-based magnetic data sets’, Earth Planet Sci. Lett. 260, 56–71.Google Scholar

Jackson, A. (1994), ‘Statistical treatment of crustal magnetization’, Geophys. J. Int. 119, 991–8.Google Scholar

Korhonen, J., Fairhead, J., Hamoudi, M., Hemant, K., Lesur, V., Mandea, M., Maus, S., Purucker, M., Ravat, D., Sazonova, T. & Th_ebault, E. (2007), Magnetic Anomaly Map of the World/Carte des anomalies magnetiques du monde, 1st edn., Commission for the Geological Map of the World, Paris.Google Scholar

Lesur, V. (2006), ‘Introducing localized constraints in global geomagnetic field modelling’, Earth Planets Space 58, 477–83.Google Scholar

Lesur, V., Hamoudi, M., Choi, Y., Dyment, J. & Thébault, E. (2016), ‘Building the second version of the world digital magnetic anomaly map (WDMAM)’, Earth Planets Space 68, 27.Google Scholar

Lesur, V., Rother, M., Vervelidou, F., Hamoudi, M. & Thébault, E. (2013), ‘Post-processing scheme for modeling the lithospheric magnetic field’, Solid Earth 4, 105–18.Google Scholar

Maus, S., Lühr, H., Hemant, K., Balasis, G., Ritter, P. & Stolle, C. (2007), ‘Fifth generation lithospheric magnetic field model from CHAMP satellite measurements’, Geochem. Geophys. Geosys. 8, Q05013, doi: 10.1029/2006GC001521.Google Scholar

Maus, S., Sazonova, T., Hemant, K., Fairhead, J. & Ravat, D. (2007), ‘National geophysical data center candidate for the world digital magnetic anomaly map’, Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 8, Q06017.Google Scholar

Mayhew, M. (1979), ‘Inversion of satellite magnetic anomaly data’, J. Geophys. 45, 119–28.Google Scholar

Parker, R. L., Shure, L. & Hildebrand, J. A. (1987), ‘The application of inverse theory to seamount magnetism’, Rev. Geophys. 25, 17–40.Google Scholar

Purucker, M., Langlais, B., Olsen, N., Hulot, G. & Mandea, M. (2002), ‘The southern edge of cratonic north america: Evidence from new stallite magnetometer observations’, Geophys. Res. Lett. 29(15), 8000.Google Scholar

Quesnel, Y., Cataláan, M. & Ishihara, T. (2009), ‘A new global marine magnetic anomaly data set’, J. Geophys. Res. 114, B04106.Google Scholar

Ravat, D., Finn, C., Hill, P., Kucks, R., Phillips, J., Blakely, R., Bouligand, C., Sabaka, T., Elshayat, A., Aref, A. & Elawadi, E. (2009), A preliminary, full spectrum, magnetic anomaly grid of the united states with improved long wavelengths for studying continental dynamics, Open-File Report 2009 1258, US Geological Survey.Google Scholar

Ravat, D., Hildenbrand, T. & Roest, W. (2003), ‘New way of processing near-surface magnetic data: the utility of the comprehensive model of the magnetic field’, Leadind Edge 22, 784–5.Google Scholar

Ravat, D., Wang, B., Wildermuth, E. & Taylor, P. (2002), ‘Gradients in the interpretation of satellite-altitude magnetic data: An example from central Africa’, J. Geodyn. 33(1–2), 131–42.Google Scholar

Runcorn, S. K. (1975), ‘On the interpretation of lunar magnetism’, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 10, 327–35.Google Scholar

Sabaka, T. J., Olsen, N. & Purucker, M. E. (2004), ‘Extending comprehensive models of the Earth’s magnetic field with Ørsted and CHAMP data’, Geophys. J. Int. 159, 521–47.Google Scholar

Spector, A. & Grant, F. (1970), ‘Statistical models for interpreting aeromagnetic data’, Geophysics 35, 293–302.Google Scholar

Thébault, E. & Vervelidou, F. (2015), ‘A statistical spatial power spectrum of the Earth’s lithospheric magnetic field’, Geophys. J. Int. 201(2), 605–20.Google Scholar

Thébault, E., Vigneron, P., Langlais, B. & Hulot, G. (2016), ‘A swarm lithospheric magnetic field model to SH degree 80’, Earth Planets Space 68(1), 126.Google Scholar

Vervelidou, F., Lesur, V., Grott, M., Morschhauser, A. & Lillis, R. J. (2017b), ‘Constraining the date of the martian dynamo shutdown by means of craters’ magnetization signatures’, J. Geophys. Res. Planets 122.Google Scholar

Vervelidou, F., Lesur, V., Morschhauser, A. & Grott, M. (2017a), ‘On the accuracy of paleopole estimations from magnetic measurements’, Geophys. J. Int. 211, 1669–78.Google Scholar

Vervelidou, F. & Thébault, E. (2015), ‘Global maps of the magnetic thickness and magnetization of the earth’s lithosphere’, Earth Planets Space 67(1), 1–19.Google Scholar

Voorhies, C. V., Sabaka, T. & Purucker, M. (2002), ‘On magnetic spectra of Earth and Mars’, J. Geophy. Res. 107 (E6), 5034.Google Scholar

Wonik, T., Trippler, K., Geipel, H., Greinwald, S. & Pashkevitch, I. (2001), ‘Magnetic anomaly map for northern, western, and eastern Europe’, Terra Nova 13(3), 203–13.Google Scholar

Abdu, M. A., et al. (2008), ‘Abnormal evening vertical plasma drift and effects on ESF and EIA over Brazil-South Atlantic sector during the 30 October 2003 superstorm’, J. Geophys. Res., 113, A07313, doi: 10.1029/2007JA012844.Google Scholar

Anderson, B. J., Korth, H., Waters, C. L., Green, D. L., Merkin, V. G., Barnes, R. J. and Dyrud, L. P. (2014), ‘Development of large-scale Birkeland currents determined from the Active Magnetosphere and Planetary Electrodynamics Response Experiment’, Geophys Res. Lett., 41, 3017–25, doi: 10.1002/2014GL059941.Google Scholar

Anderson, D. N. (1973), ‘A theoretical study of ionospheric F region equatorial anomaly – I. Theory’, Planet. Space Sci., 21, 409.Google Scholar

Anderson, D. N. (1981), ‘Modelling the ambient low latitude F region ionosphere – A review’, J. Atmos. Terr. Phys., 43, 753.Google Scholar

Appleton, E. V. (1946), ‘Two anomalies in the ionosphere’, Nature, 157, 691.Google Scholar

Astafyeva, Elvira, Zakharenkova, Irina and Matthias, Forster (2015), ‘Ionospheric response to the 2015 St. Patrick’s Day storm: A global multi-instrument overview’, J. Geophys. Res., 120, 9023–37, doi: 10.1002/2015JA021629.Google Scholar

Bahair, Siti Aminah, Abdullah, Mardina and Yatim, Baharuding (2011), ‘The response of TEC at quasi-conjugate point GPS stations during solar flares’, Acta Geophys., 59, 407–27, doi: 10.2478/s11600-010-0054-1.Google Scholar

Bailey, G. J. and Balan, N. (1996), ‘A low latitude Ionosphere-plasmasphere model’, in STEP Hand Book of Ionospheric Models, ed. R. W. Schunk, Utah State University, Logan.Google Scholar

Bailey, G. J., Balan, N. and Su, Y. Z. (1997), ‘The Sheffield University plasmasphere-ionosphere model – a review’, J. Atmos. Terr. Phys., 59, 1541.Google Scholar

Balan, N, Bailey, G. J., Abdu, M. A., Oyama, K. I., Richards, P. G., MacDougall, J. and Batista, I. S. (1997), ‘Equatorial plasma fountain and its effects over three locations: Evidence for an additional layer, the F3 layer’, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 2047–56.Google Scholar

Balan, N., Shiokawa, K., Otsuka, Y., Watanabe, S. and Bailey, G. J. (2009), ‘Super plasma fountain and equatorial ionization anomaly during penetration electric field’, J. Geophys. Res., 114, A03310, doi: 10.1029/2008JA013768.Google Scholar

Balan, N. and Bailey, G. J. (1995), ‘Equatorial plasma fountain and its effects – possibility of an additional layer’, J. Geophys. Res., 100, 21421.Google Scholar

Balan, N., Shiokawa, K., Otsuka, Y., Kikuchi, T., Vijaya Lekshmi, D., Kawamura, S., Yamamoto, M. and Bailey, G. J. (2010), ‘A physical mechanism of positive ionospheric storms at low and mid latitudes through observations and modeling’, J. Geophys. Res., 115, A02304, doi: 10.1029/2009JA014515.Google Scholar

Balan, N., Yamamoto, M., Liu, J. Y., Otsuak, Y., Liu, H. and Lühr, H. (2011), ‘New aspects of thermospheric and ionospheric storms revealed by CHAMP’, J. Geophys. Res., 116, A07305, doi: 10.1029/2010JA0160399.Google Scholar

Balan, N., Otsuka, Y., Nishioka, M., Liu, J. Y. and Bailey, G. (2013), ‘Physical mechanisms of the ionospheric storms at equatorial and higher latitudes during MP and RP of geomagnetic storms’, J. Geophys. Res., 118, 2660–69, 2012JA018557.Google Scholar

Banks, P. M. and Kockarts, G. (1973), Aeronomy, Part B, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar

Brambles, O. J., Lotko, W., Zhang, B., Wiltberger, M., Lyon, J. and Strangeway, R. J. (2011), ‘Magnetosphere sawtooth oscillations induced by ionospheric outflow’, Science, 332, 1183–6, doi: 10.1126/science.1202869.Google Scholar

Burke, W. J., Kilcommons, L. M. and Hairston, M. R. (2017), ‘Storm time coupling between the magnetosheath and the polar ionosphere’, J. Geophys. Res., 122, doi: 10.1002/2017JA024101.Google Scholar

Carlson, H. C., Oksavik, K. and Moen, J. I. (2013), ‘Thermally excited 630.0 nm O(1D) emission in the cusp: A frequent high-altitude transient signature’, J. Geopphys. Res., 118(9), 5842–52.Google Scholar

Chaston, C. C., Bonnell, J. W., Carlson, C. W., McFadden, J. P., Ergun, R. E. and Strangeway, R. J. (2003), ‘Properties of small-scale Alfvén waves and accelerated electrons from FAST’, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 8003, doi: 10.1029/2002JA009420.Google Scholar

Chen, C. H, Lin, C. H., Matsuo, T. and Chen, W. H. (2016b), ‘Ionospheric data assimilation modeling of the 2015 St. Patrick’s Day geomagnetic storm’, J. Geophys. Res., 121, 11549–59, doi: 10.1002/2016JA023346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chen, C. H., Lin, C. H., Matsuo, T., Chen, W. H., Lee, I. T., Liu, J. Y., Lin, J. T. and Hsu, C. T. (2016a), ‘Ionospheric data assimilation with thermosphere-ionosphere-electrodynamics general circulation model and GPS-TEC during geomagnetic storm conditions’, J. Geophys. Res., 121, 5708–22, doi: 10.1002/2015JA021787.Google Scholar

Cherniak, Lurii and Zakharenkova, Irina (2017), ‘New advantages of the combined GPS and GLONASS observations for high-latitude ionospheric irregularities monitoring: case study of June 2015 geomagnetic storm’, Earth Planets Space, 69, doi: 10.1186/s40623-017-0652-0.Google Scholar

Cherniak, Luril and Zakharenkova, Irina (2016), ‘High-latitude ionospheric irregularities: differences between ground- and space-based GPS measurements during the 2015 St. Patrick’s Day storm’, Earth Planets Space, 68, doi: 10.1186/s40623-016-0506-1.Google Scholar

Chisham, G. (2017), ‘A new methodology for the development of high-latitude ionospheric climatologies and empirical models’, J. Geophys. Res., 122, 932–47, doi: 10.1002/2016JA023235.Google Scholar

Clauer, C. Robert, Xu, Zhonghua, Maimaiti, M, Ruohoneimi, J. Michael, Scales, Wayne, Hartinger, Michael D., Nicolls, Michael J., Kaeppler, Stephen, Wilder, Frederick D. and Lopez, Ramon E. (2016), ‘Investigation of a rare event where the polar ionospheric reverse convection potential does not saturate during a period of extreme northward IMF solar wind driving’, J. Geophys. Res., 121, 5422–35, doi: 10.1002/2016JA022557.Google Scholar

Cnossen, Ingrid and Förster, Matthias (2016), ‘North-south asymmetries in the polar thermosphere-ionosphere system: Solar cycle and seasonal influences’, J. Geophys. Res., 121, 612–27, doi: 10.1002/2015JA021750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Connor, H. K., Zesta, E., Ober, D. M. and Raeder, J. (2014), ‘The relation between transpolar potential and reconnection rates during sudden enhancement of solar wind dynamic pressure: OpenGGCM-CTIM results’, J. Geophys. Res., 119, 3411–29, doi: 10.1002/2013JA019728.Google Scholar

Cosgrove, R. B., Bahcivan, H., Chen, S., Strangeway, R. J., Ortega, J., Alhassan, M., Xu, Y., Van Welie, M., Rehberger, J., Musielak, S. and Cahill, N. (2014), ‘Empirical model of Poynting flux derived from FAST data and a cusp signature’, J. Geophys. Res., 119, 411–30, doi: 10.1002/2013JA019105.Google Scholar

Cousins, E. D. P., Matsuo, Tomoko and Richmond, A. D. (2015), ‘Mapping high-latitude ionospheric electrodynamics with SuperDARN and AMPERE’, J. Geophys. Res., 120, 5854–70, doi: 10.1002/2014JA020463.Google Scholar

Coxon, J. C., Milan, S. E., Carter, J. A., Clausen, L. B. N., Anderson, B. J. and Korth, H. (2016), ‘Seasonal and diurnal variations in AMPERE observations of the Birkeland currents compared to modeled results’, J. Geophys. Res., 121, 4027–40, doi: 10.1002/2015JA022050.Google Scholar

Crowley, G., Knipp, D. J., Drake, K. A., Lei, J., Sutton, E. and Lühr, H. (2010), ‘Thermospheric density enhancements in the dayside cusp region during strong BY conditions’, Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, L07110, doi: 10.1029/2009GL042143.Google Scholar

Datta-Barua, S., Su, Y., Deshpande, K., Maladinovich, D., Bust, G. S., Hampton, D. and Crowley, G. (2015), ‘First light from a kilometer-baseline scintillation auroral GPS array’, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 3639–46, doi: 10.1002/2015GL063556.Google Scholar

Deshpande, K., Bust, G. S., Clauer, C. R., Rino, C. L. and Carrano, C. S. (2014), ‘Satellite-beacon Ionospheric scintillation Global Model of the upper Atmosphere (SIGMA) I: High latitude sensitivity study of the model parameters’, J. Geophys. Res., 119, 4026–43, doi: 10.1002/2013JA019699.Google Scholar

Deshpande, K., Bust, G. S., Clauer, C. R., Scales, W. A., Frissell, N. A., Ruohoniemi, J. M., Spogli, L., Mitchell, C. and Weatherwax, A. T. (2016), ‘Satellite-beacon Ionospheric-scintillation Global Model of the upper Atmosphere (SIGMA)II: Inverse modeling with high-latitude observations to deduce irregularity physics’, J. Geophys. Res., 121, 9188–9203, doi: 10.1002/2016JA022943.Google Scholar

Durgonics, Tibor, Komjathy, Attila, Verkhoglyadova, Olga, Shume, Esayas B., Benzon, Hans-Henrik, Mannucci, Anthony J., Butala, Mark D., Høeg, Per and Langley, Richard B. (2017), ‘Multi-instrument observations of a geomagnetic storm and its effects on the Arctic ionosphere: A case study of the 19 February 2014 storm’, Radio Sci., 52, 146–65, doi: 10.1002/2016RS006106.Google Scholar

Ebihara, Y. and Tanaka, T. (2015a), ’Substorm simulation: Insight into the mechanisms of initial brightening’, J. Geophys. Res., 120(9), 7270–88, doi: 10.1002/2015JA021516.Google Scholar

Ebihara, Y. and Tanaka, T. (2015b), ‘Substorm simulation: Formation of westward traveling surge’, J. Geophys. Res., 120(12), 10,466–84, doi: 10.1002/2015JA021697.Google Scholar

Ebihara, Y. and Tanaka, T. (2016), ‘Substorm simulation: Quiet and N-S arcs preceding auroral breakup’, J. Geophys. Res., 121(2), 1201–18, doi: 10.1002/2015JA021831.Google Scholar

Fejer, B. G., Depaula, E. R., Gonzales, S. A. and Woodman, R. F. (1991), ‘Average vertical and zonal F region plasma drifts over Jicamarca’, J. Geophys. Res., 96, 13901.Google Scholar

Förster, M. and Haaland, S. (2015), ‘Interhemispheric differences in ionospheric convection: Cluster EDI observations revisited’, J. Geophys. Res., 120, 5805–23, doi: 10.1002/2014JA020774.Google Scholar

Fujii, R., Amm, O., Vanhamäki, H., Yoshikawa, A. and Ieda, A. (2012), ‘An application of the finite length Cowling channel model to auroral arcs with longitudinal variations’, J. Geophys. Res., 117, A11217, doi: 10.1029/2012JA017953.Google Scholar

Fujii, R., Amm, O., Yoshikawa, A., Ieda, A. and Vanhamäki, H. (2011), ‘Reformulation and energy flow of the Cowling channel’, J. Geophys. Res., 116, A02305, doi: 10.1029/2010JA015989.Google Scholar

Fukuda, Y., Kataoka, R., Uchida, H. A., Miyoshi, Y, Hampton, D., Shiokawa, K., Ebihara, Y., Whiter, D., Iwagami, N. and Seki, K. (2017), ‘First evidence of patchy flickering aurora modulated by multi-ion electromagnetic ion cyclotron waves’, Geophys. Res. Lett., 44(9), 3963–70, doi: 10.1002/2017GL072956.Google Scholar

Grandin, M., Aikio, A. T., Kozlovsky, A., Ulich, T. and Raita, T. (2017), ‘Cosmic radio noise absorption in the high latitude ionosphere during solar wind high-speed streams’, J. Geophys. Res., 122, 5203–23, doi: 10.1002/2017JA023923.Google Scholar

Han, D. S., Chen, X. C., Liu, J. J., Qiu, Q., Keika, K., Hu, Z. J., Liu, J. M., Hu, H. Q. and Yang, H. G. (2015), ‘An extensive survey of dayside diffuse aurora based on optical observations at Yellow River Station’, J. Geophys. Res., 120(9), 7447–65, doi: 10.1002/2015JA021699.Google Scholar

Hanson, W. B. and Moffett, R. J. (1966), ‘Ionization transport effects in the equatorial F region’, J. Geophys. Res., 71, 5559.Google Scholar

Hartinger, M. D., Xu, Z., Clauer, C. R., Yu, Y., Weimer, D., Kim, H., Pilipenko, V., Welling, D. T., Behlke, R. and Willer, A. N. (2017), ‘Associating ground magnetometer observations with current or voltage generators’, J. Geophys. Res., doi: 10.1002/2017JA0241402016.Google Scholar

Hedin, A. E., Fleming, E. L., Manson, A. H., Schmidlin, F. L., Avery, S. K., Clark, R. R., Fraser, G. J., Tsuda, T., Vial, F. and Vincent, R. (1995), ‘Empirical wind model for the upper, middle and lower atmosphere’, J. Atmos. Terr. Phys., 58, 1421–47.Google Scholar

Huba, J. D., Joice, G., Sazykin, S., Wolf, R. and Spiro, R. (2005), ‘Simulation study of penetration electric field effects on the low- to mid-latitude ionosphere’, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, 123101, doi: 10.1029/2005GL024162.Google Scholar

Jaynes, A. N., Lessard, M. R., Rodriguez, J. V., Donovan, E., Loto’Aniu, T. M. and Rychert, K. (2013), ‘Pulsating auroral electron flux modulations in the equatorial magnetosphere’, J. Geophys. Res., 118(8), 4884–94, doi: 10.1002/jgra.50434.Google Scholar

Jaynes, A. N., Lessard, M. R., Takahashi, K., Ali, A. F., Malaspina, D. M., Michell, R. G., Spanswick, E. L. et al. (2015), ‘Correlated Pc4-5 ULF waves, whistler-mode chorus, and pulsating aurora observed by the Van Allen Probes and ground-based systems’, J. Geophys. Res., 120(10), 8749–61, doi: 10.1002/2015JA021380.Google Scholar

Kataoka, R., Miyoshi, Y., Hampton, D., Ishii, T. and Kozako, Y. (2012), ‘Pulsating aurora beyond the ultra-low-frequency range’, J. Geophys. Res., 117(A8), A08336, doi: 10.1029/2012JA017987.Google Scholar

Kelley, M. C., Vlasov, M. N., Foster, J. C. and Coster, A. J. (2004), ‘A quantitative explanation for the phenomenon known as storm-enhanced density’, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L19809, doi: 10.1029/2004GL020875.Google Scholar

Kepko, L., McPherron, R. L., Amm, O., Apatenkov, S., Baumjohann, W., Birn, W., Lester, M., Nakamura, R., Pulkkinen, T. I. and Sergeev, V. (2015), ‘Substorm current wedge revisited’, Space Sci. Rev., 190(1–4), 1–46, doi: 10.1007/s11214-014-0124-9.Google Scholar

Kikuchi, T. (2014), ‘Transmission line model for the near-instantaneous transmission of the ionospheric electric field and currents to the equator’, J. Geophys. Res., 119, 1131–56, doi: 10.1002/2013JA019515.Google Scholar

Kim, H., Clauer, C. R., Gerrard, A. J., Engebretson, M. J., Hartinger, M. D., Lessard, M. R., Matzka, J., Sibeck, D. G., Singer, H. J., Stolle, C., Weimer, D. R. and Xu, Z. (2017), ‘Conjugate observations of electromagnetic iono-cyclotron waves associated with traveling convection vortex events’, J. Geophys. Res., 122, 7336–52, doi: 10.1002/2017JA024108.Google Scholar

Kim, H., Clauer, C. R., Deshpande, K., Lessard, M. R., Weatherwax, A. T., Bust, G. S., Crowley, G. and Humphreys, T. E. (2014), ‘Ionospheric irregularities during a substorm event: Observations of ULF pulsations and GPS scintillations’, J. Atmos. Sol. Terr. Phys., 114, 1–8, doi: 10.1016/j.jastp.2014.03.006.Google Scholar

Kim, H., Clauer, C. R., Engebretson, M. J., Matzka, J., Sibeck, D. G., Singer, H. J., Stolle, C., Weimer, D. R. and Xu, Z. (2015), ‘Conjugate observations of traveling convection vortices associated with transient events at the magnetopause’, J. Geophys. Res., 120, 2015–35, doi: 10.1002/2014JA020743.Google Scholar

Kim, H., Cai, X., Clauer, C. R., Kunduri, B. S. R., Matzka, J., Stolle, C. and Weimer, D. R. (2013), ‘Geomagnetic response to solar wind dynamic pressure impulse events at high-latitude conjugate points’, J. Geophys. Res., 118, 6055–71, doi: 10.1002/jgra50555.Google Scholar

Kivelson, M. G. and Ridley, A. J. (2008), ‘Saturation of the polar cap potential: Inference from Alfvén wing arguments’, J. Geophys. Res., 113, doi: 10.1029/2007JA012,302.Google Scholar

Knipp, D., Eriksson, S., Kilcommons, L., Crowley, G., Lei, J., Hairston, M. and Drake, K. (2011), ‘Extreme Poynting flux in the dayside thermosphere: Examples and statistics’, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L16102, doi: 10.1029/2011GL048302.Google Scholar

Korte, M. and Stolze, S. (2016), ‘Variations in mid-latitude auroral activity during the Holocene’, Archaeometry, 58 (1), 159–76, doi: 10.1111/arcm.12152.Google Scholar

Kubota, Y., Nagatsuma, T., Den, M., Tanaka, T. and Fujita, S. (2017), ‘Polar cap potential saturation during the Bastille Day storm event using global MHD simulation’, J. Geophys. Res., 122, 4398–4409, doi: 10.1002/2016JA023851.Google Scholar

Laundal, K. M., Cnossen, I., Milan, S. E., Haaland, S. E., Coxon, J., Pedatella, N. M., Förster, M. and Reistad, J. P. (2017), ‘North-South asymmetries in Earth’s magnetic field. Effects on high-latitude geospace’, Space Sci. Rev., 206, 225–57, doi: 10.1007/s11214-016-0273-0.Google Scholar

Li, W., Bortnik, J., Thorne, R. M., Nishimura, Y., Angelopoulos, V. and Chen, L. (2011b), ‘Modulation of whistler mode chorus waves: 2. Role of density variations’, J. Geophys. Res., 116(A6), A06206, doi: 10.1029/2010JA016313.Google Scholar

Li, W., Thorne, R. M., Bortnik, J., Nishimura, Y. and Angelopoulos, V. (2011a), ‘Modulation of whistler mode chorus waves: 1. Role of compressional Pc4-5 pulsations’, J. Geophys. Res., 116(A6), A06205, doi: 10.1029/2010JA016312.Google Scholar

Liang, J., Donovan, E., Jackel, B., Spanswick, E. and Gillies, M. (2016), ‘On the 630 nm red-line pulsating aurora: Red-line emission geospace observatory observations and model simulations’, J. Geophys. Res., 121(8), 7988–8012, doi: 10.1002/2016JA022901.Google Scholar

Lin, C. H., Richmond, A. D., Heelis, R. A., Bailey, G. J., Lu, G., Liu, J. Y., Yeh, H. C. and Su, S. Y. (2005), ‘Theoretical study of the low and mid latitude ionospheric electron density enhancement during the October 2003 storm: Relative importance of the neutral wind and the electric field’, J. Geophys. Res., 110, A12312, doi: 10.1029/2005JA011304.Google Scholar

Lin, D., Zhang, B., Scales, W. A., Wiltberger, M., Clauer, C. R. and Xu, Z. (2017), ‘The role of solar wind density in cross polar cap potential saturation under northward interplanetary magnetic field’, Geophys. Res. Lett., doi: 10.1002/2017GL075275.Google Scholar

Liu, J., Hu, H., Han, D., Yang, H. and Lester, M. (2015), ‘Simultaneous ground-based optical and SuperDARN observations of the shock aurora at MLT noon’, Earth Planet. Space, 67, 120, doi: 10.1186/s40623-015-0291-2.Google Scholar

Lopez, R. E., Bruntz, R., Mitchell, E. J., Wiltberger, M., Lyon, J. G and Merkin, V. G. (2010), ‘Role of magnetosheath force balance in regulating the dayside reconnection potential’, J. Geophys. Res., 115, doi: 10.1029/2009JA014597.Google Scholar

Loucks, D., Palo, S., Pilinski, M., Crowley, G., Azeem, I. and Hampton, D. (2017), ‘High-latitude GPS phase scintillation from E region electron density gradients during the 20–21 December 2015 geomagnetic storm’, J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys., 122(7), 7473–90, doi: 10.1002/2016JA023839.Google Scholar

Lu, G., Goncharenko, L. P., Nicolls, M. J., Maute, A. I., Coster, A. J. and Paxton, L. J. (2012), ‘Ionospheric and thermospheric variations associated with prompt penetration electric fields’, J. Geophys. Res., 117, A08312, doi: 10.1029/2012JA017769.Google Scholar

Lühr, H., Rother, M., Köhler, W., Ritter, P. and Grunwaldt, L. (2004), ‘Thermospheric up-welling in the cusp region: Evidence from CHAMP observations’, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L06805, doi: 10.1029/2003GL019314.Google Scholar

Lysak, R. L. (1999), ‘Propagation of Alfvén waves through the ionosphere: Dependence on ionospheric parameters’, J. Geophys. Res., 104(10), 10017–30.Google Scholar

Lysak, R. L. (2004), ‘Magnetosphere–ionosphere coupling by Alfvén waves at midlatitudes’, J. Geophys. Res., 109, A07201, doi: 10.1029/2004JA010454.Google Scholar

Lysak, R. L. and Yoshikawa, A. (2006), ‘Resonant cavities and waveguides in the ionosphere and atmosphere’, in Magnetospheric ULF Waves: Synthesis and New Directions, ed. Takahashi, K., Chi, P. J., Denton, R. E. and Lysak, R. L., American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC, doi: 10.1029/169GM19.Google Scholar

Lysak, R. L., Waters, C. L. and Sciffer, M. D. (2013), ‘Modeling of the ionospheric Alfvén resonator in dipolar geometry’, J. Geophys. Res., 118, 1514–28, doi: 10.1002/jgra.50090.Google Scholar

Maimaiti, Maimaitirebike, Ruohoniemi, John Michael, Baker, J. B H., Clauer, Robert, Nicolls, Michael J. and Hairston, Marc R. (2017), ‘RISR-N observations of the IMF By influence on reverse convection during extreme northward IMF’, J. Geophys. Res., 122, doi: 10.1002/2016JA023612.Google Scholar

Mannucci, A. J., Tsurutani, B. T., Iijima, B. A., Komjathy, A., Saito, A., Gonzalez, W. D., Guarnieri, F. L., Kozyra, J. U. and Skoug, R. (2005), ‘Dayside global ionospheric response to the major interplanetary events of October 29–30, 2003 Halloween Storms’, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L12S02, doi: 10.1029/2004GL021467.Google Scholar

Marklund, G. T., Sadeghi, S., Li, B., Amm, O., Cumnock, J. A., Zhang, Y., Nilsson, H. et al. (2012), ‘Cluster multipoint study of the acceleration potential pattern and electrodynamics of an auroral surge and its associated horn arc’, J. Geophys. Res., 117(10), A10223, doi: 10.1029/2012JA018046.Google Scholar

Martyn, D. F. (1955), ‘Theory of height and ionization density changes at the maximum of a Chapman-like region, taking account of ion production, decay, diffusion and total drift’, in Proceedings, Cambridge Conference, p. 254, Physical Society, London.Google Scholar

McGranaghan, Ryan, Knipp, Delores J. and Matsuo, Tomoko (2016a), ‘High-latitude ionospheric conductivity variability in three dimensions’, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 7867–77, doi: 10.1002/2016GL070253.Google Scholar

McGranaghan, Ryan, Knipp, Delores J., Tomoko, Matsuo and Cousins, Ellen (2016b), ‘Optimal interpolation analysis of high-latitude ionospheric Hall and Pedersen conductivities: Application to assimilative ionospheric electrodynamics reconstruction’, J. Geophys. Res., 121, 4898–4923, doi: 10.1002/2016JA022486.Google Scholar

McGranaghan, Ryan, Knipp, Delores J., Tomoko, Matsuo, Godinez, Humberto, Redmon, Robert J., Solomon, Stanley C. and Morley, Steven K. (2015), ‘Modes of high-latitude auroral conductance variability derived from DMSP energetic electron precipitation observations: Empirical orthogonal function analysis’, J. Geophys. Res., 120, 11013–31, doi: 10.1002/2015JA021828.Google Scholar

Mende, S. B., Frey, H. U. and Angelopoulos, V. (2016), ‘Source of the dayside cusp aurora’, J. Geophys. Res., 121(8), 7728–38, doi: 10.1002/2016JA022657.Google Scholar

Mitra, S. K. (1946), ‘Geomagnetic control of region F2 of the ionosphere’, Nature, 158 , 668.Google Scholar

Miyoshi, Y., Oyama, S., Saito, S., Kurita, S., Fujiwara, H., Kataoka, R., Ebihara, Y. et al. (2015), ‘Energetic electron precipitation associated with pulsating aurora: EISCAT and Van Allen Probe observations’, J. Geophys. Res., 120(4), 2754–66, doi: 10.1002/2014JA020690.Google Scholar

Moffett, R. J. (1979), ‘The equatorial anomaly in the electron distribution of the terrestrial F region’, Fund. Cosmic Phys., 4, 313.Google Scholar

Moffett, R. J. and Hanson, W. B. (1965), ‘Effect of ionization transport on the equatorial F region’, Nature, 206, 705.Google Scholar

Motoba, T., Ebihara, Y., Kadokura, A. and Weatherwax, A. T. (2014), ‘Fine-scale transient arcs seen in a shock aurora’, J. Geophys. Res., 119(8), 6249–55, doi: 10.1002/2014JA020229.Google Scholar

Myllys, M., Kilpua, E. K. J., Lavraud, B. and Pulkkinen, J. I. (2016), ‘Solar wind–magnetosphere coupling efficiency during ejecta and sheath-driven geomagnetic storms’, J. Geophys. Res., 121, 4378–96, doi: 10.1002/2016JA022407.Google Scholar

Myllys, M., Kipua, E. K. J. and Lavraud, B. (2017), ‘Interplay of solar wind parameters and physical mechanisms producing the saturation of the cross polar cap potential’, Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 3019–27, doi: 10.1002/2017GL072676.Google Scholar

Namba, S. and Maeda, K.-I. (1939), Radio Wave Propagation, report, Corona, Tokyo.Google Scholar

Newell, P. T., Liou, K., Zhang, Y., Sotirelis, T., Paxton, L. J. and Mitchell, E. J. (2014), ‘OVATION Prime-2013: Extension of auroral precipitation model to higher disturbance levels’, Space Weather, 12(6), 368–79, doi: 10.1002/2014SW001056.Google Scholar

Nishimura, Y., Bortnik, J., Li, W., Thorne, R. M., Chen, L., Lyons, L. R., Angelopoulos, V. et al. (2011), ‘Multievent study of the correlation between pulsating aurora and whistler mode chorus emissions’, J. Geophys. Res, 116(A11), A11221, doi: 10.1029/2011JA016876.Google Scholar

Nishimura, Y., Lyons, L. R., Angelopoulos, V., Kikuchi, T., Zou, S. and Mende, S. B. (2011), ‘Relations between multiple auroral streamers, pre-onset thin arc formation, and substorm auroral onset’, J. Geophys. Res., 116(A9), A09214, doi: 10.1029/2011JA016768.Google Scholar

Nishiyama, T., Sakanoi, T., Miyoshi, Y., Katoh, Y., Asamura, K., Okano, S. and Hirahara, M. (2011), ‘The source region and its characteristic of pulsating aurora based on the Reimei observations’, J. Geophys. Res., 116(3), A03226, doi: 10.1029/2010JA015507.Google Scholar

Nomura, R., Shiokawa, K., Omura, Y., Ebihara, Y., Miyoshi, Y., Sakaguchi, K., Otsuka, Y. and Connors, M. (2016), ‘Pulsating proton aurora caused by rising tone Pc1 waves’, J. Geophys. Res., 121(2), 1608–18, doi: 10.1002/2015JA021681.Google Scholar

Ozaki, M., Shiokawa, K., Miyoshi, Y., Kataoka, R., Yagitani, S., Inoue, T., Ebihara, Y. et al. (2016), ‘Fast modulations of pulsating proton aurora related to subpacket structures of Pc1 geomagnetic pulsations at subauroral latitudes’, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43(15), 7859–66, doi: 10.1002/2016GL070008.Google Scholar

Park, Jaeheung, Lühr, Hermann, Kervalishvili, Gurarn, Rauberg, Jan, Stolle, Claudia, Kwak, Young-Sil, and Lee, Woo Kyoung (2017), ‘Morphology of high-latitude plasma density perturbations as deduced from the total electron content measurements onboard the Swarm constellation’, J. Geophys. Res., 122, 1338–59, doi: 10.1002/2016JA023086.Google Scholar

Parker, E. N. (1996), ‘The alternative paradigm for magnetospheric physics’, J. Geophys. Res., 101(10), 10587–625.Google Scholar

Picone, J. M., Hedin, A. E., Drob, D. and Aikin, A. C. (2002), ‘NRLMSISE-00 empirical model of the atmosphere: Statistical comparisons and scientific issues’, J. Geophys. Res., 107(A12), A1468, doi: 10.1029/2002JA009430.Google Scholar

Prikryl, P., Ghoddousi-Fard, R., Weygand, J. M., Viljanen, A., Connors, M., Danskin, D. W., Jayachandran, P. T., Jacobsen, K. S., Andalsvik, Y. L., Thomas, E. G., ruohoniemi, J. M., Durgonics, T., Oksavik, K., Zhang, Y., Spanswick, E., Aquino, M. and Sreeja, V. (2016), ‘GPS phase scintillation at high latitudes during the geomagnetic storm of 17–18 March 2015’, J. Geophys. Res., 121, 10448–65, doi: 10.1002/2016JA023171.Google Scholar

Prikryl, Paul, Thayyil Jayachandran, P., Mushini, Sajan C. and Richardson, Ian G. (2014), ‘High-latitude GPS phase scintillation and cycle slips during high-speed solar wind streams and interplanetary coronal mass ejections: A superposed epoch analysis’, Earth Planets Space, 66, doi: 10.1186/1880-5981-66-62.Google Scholar

Rajaram, G. (1977), ‘Structure of the equatorial F region, topside and bottomside – A review’, J. Atmos. Terr. Phys., 39, 1125.Google Scholar

Reiff, P. H. and Luhmann, J. G. (1986), ‘Solar wind control of the polar cap voltage’, in Solar Wind–Magnetosphere Coupling, ed. Kamide, Y. and Slavin, J. A., p. 507, Terra Scientific, Tokyo.Google Scholar

Reiff, P., Spiro, R. and Hill, T. (1981), ‘Dependence of polar cap potential on interplanetary parameters’, J. Geophys. Res., 86(7), 639.Google Scholar

Richmond, A. D. (1995), ‘Ionospheric electrodynamics’, in Handbook of Atmospheric Electrodynamics, vol. II, ed. Volland, H., pp. 249–90, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar

Rishbeth, H., Lyon, A. J. and Peart, M. (1963), ‘Diffusion in the equatorial F layer’, J. Geophys. Res., 68, 2559.Google Scholar

Roble, R. G. and Ridley, E. C. (1994), ‘Thermosphere‐ionosphere‐mesosphere‐electrodynamics general circulation model (time‐GCM): Equinox solar cycle minimum simulations (300–500 km)’, Geophys. Res. Lett., 21, 417–20, doi: 10.1029/93GL03391.Google Scholar

Rodriguez, J. V., Carlson, H. C. and Heelis, R. A. (2012), ‘Auroral forms that extend equatorward from the persistent midday aurora during geomagnetically quiet periods’, J. Atmos. Sol. Terr. Phys., 86, 6–24, doi: 10.1016/j.jastp.2012.06.001.Google Scholar

Russell, C. T., Luhmann, J. G. and Strangeway, R. J. (2016), Space Physics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Samara, M., Michell, R. G. and Khazanov, G. V. (2017), ‘First optical observations of interhemispheric electron reflections within pulsating aurora’, Geophys. Res. Lett., 44(6), 2618–23, doi: 10.1002/2017GL072794.Google Scholar

Sandholt, P. E. and Farrugia, C. J. (2014), ‘Aspects of magnetosphere-ionosphere coupling in sawtooth substorms: A case study’, Ann. Geophys., 32, 1277–91, doi: 10.5194/angeo-32-1277-2014.Google Scholar

Sandholt, P. E., Farrugia, C. J. and Denig, W. F. (2015), ‘Transitions between states of magnetotail-ionosphere coupling and the role of solar wind dynamic pressure: the 25 July 2004 interplanetary CME case’, Ann. Geophys., 33, 427–36, doi: 10.5194/angeo-33-427-2015.Google Scholar

Siscoe, G. L., Erickson, G. M., Sonnerup, B. U. O., Maynard, N. C., Schoendorf, J. A., Siebert, K. D., Weimer, D. R., White, W. W. and Wilson, G. R. (2002a), ‘Hill model of transpolar potential saturation: Comparisons with MHD simulations’, J. Geophys. Res., 107(A6), doi: 10.1029/2001JA000109.Google Scholar

Siscoe, G. L., Crooker, N. U. and Siebert, K. D. (2002b), ‘Transpolar potential saturation: Roles of region 1 current system and solar wind ram pressure’, J. Geophys. Res., 107(A10), doi: 10.1029/2001JA009176.Google Scholar

Song, P., Vasyliũnas, V. M. and Ma, L. (2005), ‘A three-fluid model of solar wind–magnetosphere–ionosphere–thermosphere coupling’, in Multiscale Coupling of Sun-Earth Processes, ed. Lui, A. T. Y., Kamide, Y. and Consolini, G., pp. 447–56, Elsevier, Amsterdam, doi: 10.1016/B978-044451881-1/50033-2.Google Scholar

Souza, J. R., Asevedo, W. D. Jr, dos Santos, P. C. P., Petry, A., Bailey, G. J., Batista, I. S. and Abdu, M. A. (2013), ‘Longitudinal variation of the equatorial ionosphere: Modeling and experimental results’, Adv. Space Res., 51, 654–60, doi: 10.1016/j.asr.2012.01.023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stening, R. J. (1992), ‘Modeling the low-latitude F region’, J. Atmos. Terr. Phys., 54, 1387.Google Scholar

Strangeway, R. J. (2009), ‘Space environment and scientific missions: Magnetic fields in space’, IEEE T. Magn., 45(10), 4486–92.Google Scholar

Strangeway, R. J. (2012), ‘The equivalence of Joule dissipation and frictional heating in the collisional ionosphere’, J. Geophys. Res., 117, A02310, doi: 10.1029/2011JA017302.Google Scholar

Strangeway, R. J. and Raeder, J. (2001), ‘On the transition from collisionless to collisional magnetohydrodynamics’, J. Geophys. Res., 106(A2), 1955–60, doi: 10.1029/2000JA900116.Google Scholar

Strangeway, R. J., Ergun, R. E., Su, Y.-J., Carlson, C. W. and Elphic, R. C. (2005), ‘Factors controlling ionospheric outflows as observed at intermediate altitudes’, J. Geophys. Res., 110, A03221, doi: 10.1029/2004JA010829.Google Scholar

Tanaka, T. (2015), ‘Substorm auroral dynamics reproduced by advanced global magnetosphere–ionosphere (M-I) coupling simulation’, in Auroral Dynamics and Space Weather, pp. 177–90, John Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, doi: 10.1002/9781118978719.ch13.Google Scholar

Tu, J., Song, P. and Vasyliũnas, V. M. (2011), ‘Ionosphere/thermosphere heating determined from dynamic magnetosphere-ionosphere/thermosphere coupling’, J. Geophys. Res., 116, A09311, doi: 10.1029/2011JA016620.Google Scholar

Tu, J., Song, P. and Vasyliũnas, V. M. (2014), ‘Inductive-dynamic magnetosphere-ionosphere coupling via MHD waves’, J. Geophys. Res., 119, 530–47, doi: 10.1002/2013JA018982.Google Scholar

Vorobjev, V. G., Yagodkina, O. I. and Katkalov, Yu. V. (2013), ‘Auroral precipitation model and its applications to ionospheric and magnetospheric studies’, J. Atmos. Sol. Terr. Phys., 102, 157–71, doi: 10.1016/j.jastp.2013.05.007.Google Scholar

Wahlund, J. E., Opgenoorth, H. J., Haggstrom, I., Winser, K. J. and Jones, G. O. L. (1992), ‘EISCAT observations of topside ionospheric ion outflows during auroral activity: revisited’, J. Geophys. Res., 97, 3019–37, doi: 10.1029/91JA02438.Google Scholar

Watson, Chris, Jayachandran, P. T. and MacDougall, John W. (2016), ‘Characteristics of GPS TEC variations in the polar cap ionosphere’, J. Geophys. Res., 121, 4748–68, doi: 10.1002/2015JA022275.Google Scholar

Weimer, D. R., Edwards, T. R. and Olsen, Nils (2017), ‘Linear response of field-aligned currents to the interplanetary electric field’, J. Geophys. Res., 122, 8502–15, doi: 10.1002/2017JA024372.Google Scholar

Wilder, F. D., Clauer, C. R., Baker, J. B. H., Cousins, E. P. and Hairston, M. R. (2011), ‘Inter-hemispheric observations of dayside convection under northward IMF’, J. Geophys. Res., 116, doi: 10.1029/2011JA016748.Google Scholar

Wilder, F. D., Crowley, G., Anderson, B. J. and Richmond, A. D. (2012), ‘Intense dayside Joule heating during the 5 April 2010 geomagnetic storm recovery phase observed by AMIE and AMPERE’, J. Geophys. Res., 117, doi: 10.1029/2011JA017262.Google Scholar

Wilder, F. D., Eriksson, S. and Wiltberger, M. (2015), ‘The role of magnetic flux tube deformation and magnetosheath plasma beta in the saturation of the Region 1 field-aligned current system’, J. Geophys. Res., 120, 2036–51, doi: 10.1002/2014JA020533.Google Scholar

Wilder, Frederick, Clauer, Robert and Baker, Joseph (2010), ‘Polar cap electric field saturation during IMF Bz north and south conditions’, J. Geophys. Res., 115, A10230, doi: 10.1029/2010JA015487.Google Scholar

Xiao, F., Zong, Q., Su, Z., Yang, C., He, Z., Wang, Y. and Gao, Z. (2013), ‘Determining the mechanism of cusp proton aurora’, Sci. Rep., 3, 1654, doi: 10.1038/srep01654.Google Scholar

Xiao, F., Zong, Q., Wang, Y., He, Z., Su, Z., Yang, C. and Zhou, Q. (2015), ‘Generation of proton aurora by magnetosonic waves’, Sci. Rep., 4, 5190, doi: 10.1038/srep05190.Google Scholar

Yoshikawa, A., Amm, O., Vanhamäki, H., Nakamizo, A. and Fujii, R. (2013), ‘Theory of Cowling channel formation by reflection of shear Alfven waves from the auroral ionosphere’, J. Geophys. Res., 118, 6416–25, doi: 10.1002/jgra.50514.Google Scholar

Zhou, X., Haerendel, G., Moen, J. I., Trondsen, E., Clausen, L., Strangeway, R. J., Lybekk, B. and Lorentzen, D. A. (2017), ‘Shock aurora: Field-aligned discrete structures moving along the dawnside oval’, J. Geophys. Res., 122(3), 3145–62, doi: 10.1002/2016JA022666.Google Scholar

Akasofu, S. I. (1964), ‘The development of the auroral substorm’, Planet. Space Sci., 12(4), 273–82. doi: 10.1016/0032-0633(64)90151-5Google Scholar

Akasofu, S. I., Chapman, S. and Meng, C. I. (1965), ‘Polar electrojet’, J. Atmos. Terr. Phys., 27(11–1), 1275. doi: 10.1016/0021-9169(65)90087-5Google Scholar

Anderson, B. J., and Hamilton, D. C. (1993), ‘Electromagnetic ion cyclotron waves stimulated by modest magnetospheric compressions’, J. Geophys. Res., 98(A7). doi: 10.1029/93JA00605.Google Scholar

Angelopoulos, V. (2008), ‘The THEMIS mission’, Space Sci. Rev., 141(1–4), 5–34. doi: 10.1007/s11214-008-9336-1Google Scholar

Angelopoulos, V., et al. (2008), ‘Tail reconnection triggering substorm onset’, Science, 321(5891), 931–5. doi: 10.1126/science.1160495Google Scholar

Angelopoulos, V., et al. (2009), ‘Response to comment on “Tail reconnection triggering substorm onset”’, Science, 324(5933). doi: 10.1126/science.1168045Google Scholar

Baker, D. N., et al. (2013), ‘A long-lived relativistic electron storage ring embedded in Earth’s outer Van Allen belt’, Science, 6129, 186–90. doi: 10.1126/science.1233518Google Scholar

Baker, D. N., et al. (2014). ‘An impenetrable barrier to ultrarelativistic electrons in the Van Allen radiation belts’, Nat. Lett., 515, 531–4. doi: 10.1038/nature13956Google Scholar

Baker, D., Pulkkinen, T., Angelopoulos, V., Baumjohann, W. and McPherron, R. L. (1996), ‘Neutral line model of substorms: Past results and present view’, J. Geophys. Res., 101(A6), 12975–13010. doi: 10.1029/95JA03753Google Scholar

Baker, D. N., et al. (2014), ‘An impenetrable barrier to ultra-relativistic electrons in the Van Allen radiation belts’, Nature, 515, 531–4.Google Scholar

Baker, D. N. (2014). ‘New twists in Earth’s radiation belts’, Am. Sci., 102(5), 374–381.Google Scholar

Baker, D.N., Kanekal, S. G., Li, X., Monk, S. P., Goldstein, J. and Burch, J. L. (2004), ‘An extreme distortion of the Van Allen belt arising from the “Hallowe’en” solar storm in 2003’, Nature, 432, 878–81. doi: 10.1038/nature03116Google Scholar

Baker, D. N., Kanekal, S. G., Hoxie, V. C., Henderson, M. G., Li, X., Spence, H. E., Elkington, S. R., Friedel, R. H., Goldstein, J., Hudson, M. K., Reeves, G. D., Thorne, R. M., Kletzing, C. A. and Claudepierre, S. G. (2013), ‘A long-lived relativistic electron storage ring embedded within the Earth’s outer Van Allen Radiation Zone’, Science, 340, 186–90. doi: 10.1126/science.1233518Google Scholar

Balikhin, M. A., et al. (2015), ‘Observations of discrete harmonics emerging from equatorial noise’, Nat. Comm., 6, 7703. doi: 10.1038/ncomms8703Google Scholar