[1] Glashow, S. L., Partial symmetries of weak interactions, Nucl. Phys. 22 (1961) 579–588.Google Scholar

[2] Salam, A., Weak and electromagnetic interactions, Conf. Proc. C680519 (1968) 367–377.Google Scholar

[3] Weinberg, S., A model of leptons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 19 (1967) 1264–1266.Google Scholar

[4] Hooft, G.’t, Naturalness, chiral symmetry, and spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking, NATO Sci. Ser. B 59 (1980) 135–157.Google Scholar

[5] Gaillard, M. and Lee, B. W., Rare decay modes of the K-mesons in gauge theories, Phys. Rev. D10 (1974) 897.Google Scholar

[6] Glashow, S. L., Iliopoulos, J., and Maiani, L., Weak interactions with Lepton-Hadron symmetry, Phys. Rev. D2 (1970) 1285–1292.Google Scholar

[7] Branco, G. C., Lavoura, L., and Silva, J. P., CP violation, Int. Ser. Monogr. Phys. 103 (1999) 1–536.Google Scholar

[8] Donoghue, J. F., Golowich, E., and B. R. Holstein, Dynamics of the standard model, Camb. Monogr. Part. Phys. Nucl. Phys. Cosmol. 2 (1992) 1–540. [Camb. Monogr. Part. Phys. Nucl. Phys. Cosmol. 35(2014)].Google Scholar

[9] Bigi, I. I. and Sanda, A., CP violation, Camb. Monogr. Part. Phys. Nucl. Phys. Cosmol. 9 (2000) 1–382.Google Scholar

[10] Langacker, P., The Standard Model and Beyond. CRC Press, 2010.Google Scholar

[11] Ryder, L. H., Quantum Field Theory. Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

[12] Gell-Mann, M., Ramond, P., and Slansky, R., Color embeddings, charge assignments, and proton stability in unified gauge theories, Rev. Mod. Phys. 50 (1978) 721.Google Scholar

[13] Bjorken, J. D. and Drell, S. D., Relativistic Quantum Fields. McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1965.Google Scholar

[14] Peskin, M. E. and Schroeder, D. V., An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1995.Google Scholar

[15] Weinberg, S., The Quantum Theory of Fields. Vol. 2: Modern Applications. Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

[16] Bailin, D. and Love, A., Introduction to Gauge Field Theory. Adam Hilger, Bristol and Boston, 1986.Google Scholar

[17] Weinberg, S., Implications of dynamical symmetry breaking, Phys. Rev. D13 (1976) 974–996.Google Scholar

[18] Pokorski, S., Gauge Field Theories. Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

[19] Cabibbo, N., Unitary symmetry and leptonic decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 10 (1963) 531–533. [648(1963)].Google Scholar

[20] Kobayashi, M. and Maskawa, T., CP violation in the renormalizable theory of weak interaction, Prog. Theor. Phys. 49 (1973) 652–657.Google Scholar

[21] Pontecorvo, B., Mesonium and antimesonium, Sov. Phys. JETP 6 (1957) 429.Google Scholar

[22] Maki, Z., Nakagawa, M., and Sakata, S., Remarks on the unified model of elementary particles, Prog. Theor. Phys. 28 (1962) 870.Google Scholar

[23] Bilenky, S., Introduction to the physics of massive and mixed neutrinos, Lect. Notes Phys. 817 (2010) 1–255.Google Scholar

[24] Altmannshofer, W., Frugiuele, C., and Harnik, R., Fermion hierarchy from sfermion anarchy, JHEP 12 (2014) 180, [arXiv:1409.2522].Google Scholar

[25] Chau, L.-L. and Keung, W.-Y., Comments on the parametrization of the Kobayashi-Maskawa matrix, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53 (1984) 1802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

[26] Wolfenstein, L., Parametrization of the Kobayashi-Maskawa matrix, Phys. Rev. Lett. 51 (1983) 1945.Google Scholar

[27] Buras, A. J., Lautenbacher, M. E., and Ostermaier, G., Waiting for the top quark mass, , mixing and CP asymmetries in B decays, Phys. Rev. D50 (1994) 3433–3446, [hep-ph/9403384].Google Scholar

[28] Branco, G. C. and Lavoura, L., Wolfenstein type parametrization of the quark mixing matrix, Phys. Rev. D38 (1988) 2295.Google Scholar

[29] Buras, A. J., Weak Hamiltonian, CP violation and rare decays, in Probing the Standard Model of Particle Interactions. Proceedings, Summer School in Theoretical Physics, NATO Advanced Study Institute, 68th session, Les Houches, France, July 28–September 5, 1997. Pt. 1, 2, pp. 281–539, 1998. hep-ph/9806471.Google Scholar

[30] Jarlskog, C. and Stora, R., Unitarity polygons and CP violation areas and phases in the standard electroweak model, Phys. Lett. B208 (1988) 268–274.Google Scholar

[31] Aleksan, R., Kayser, B., and London, D., Determining the quark mixing matrix from CP violating asymmetries, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73 (1994) 18–20, [hep-ph/9403341].Google Scholar

[32] Jarlskog, C., Commutator of the quark mass matrices in the standard electroweak model and a measure of maximal CP violation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55 (1985) 1039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

[33] Jarlskog, C., A basis independent formulation of the connection between quark mass matrices, CP violation and experiment, Z. Phys. C29 (1985) 491–497.Google Scholar

[34] Buras, A. J., Parodi, F., and Stocchi, A., The CKM matrix and the unitarity triangle: Another look, JHEP 0301 (2003) 029, [hep-ph/0207101].Google Scholar

[35] Particle Data Group Collaboration, Tanabashi, M. et al., Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D98 (2018), no. 3 030001.Google Scholar

[36] Politzer, H. D., Reliable perturbative results for strong interactions? Phys. Rev. Lett. 30 (1973) 1346–1349.Google Scholar

[37] Gross, D. J. and Wilczek, F., Ultraviolet behavior of nonabelian gauge theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 30 (1973) 1343–1346.Google Scholar

[38] Gross, D. J. and Wilczek, F., Asymptotically free gauge theories. 1, Phys. Rev. D8 (1973) 3633–3652.Google Scholar

[39] Gross, D. J. and Wilczek, F., Asymptotically Free gauge theories. 2., Phys. Rev. D9 (1974) 980–993.Google Scholar

[40] Brambilla, N., Pineda, A., Soto, J., and Vairo, A., Effective field theories for heavy Quarkonium, Rev. Mod. Phys. 77 (2005) 1423, [hep-ph/0410047].Google Scholar

[41] Brambilla, N. et al., Heavy quarkonium: Progress, puzzles, and opportunities, Eur. Phys. J. C71 (2011) 1534, [arXiv:1010.5827].Google Scholar

[42] Brambilla, N. et al., QCD and strongly coupled gauge theories: Challenges and perspectives, Eur. Phys. J. C74 (2014), no. 10 2981, [arXiv:1404.3723].Google Scholar

[43] Blanke, M., Introduction to flavour physics and CP violation, CERN Yellow Rep. School Proc. 1705 (2017) 71–100, [arXiv:1704.03753].Google Scholar

[44] Zupan, J., Introduction to flavour physics, 2019. arXiv:1903.05062.Google Scholar

[45] Nir, Y., CP violation in and beyond the standard model, in CP Violation: In and beyond the Standard Model: Proceedings, 27th SLAC Summer Institute on Particle Physics (SSI 99): Stanford, USA, Jul 7–16 1999, 1999. hep-ph/9911321.Google Scholar

[46] Silvestrini, L., Effective theories for quark flavour physics, 2019. arXiv:1905.00798.Google Scholar

[47] Schwartz, M. D., Quantum Field Theory and the Standard Model. Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

[48] Aoki, S. et al., Review of lattice results concerning low-energy particle physics, Eur. Phys. J. C77 (2017), no. 2 112, [arXiv:1607.00299].Google Scholar

[49] TUMQCD, Fermilab Lattice, MILC Collaboration, Bazavov, A. et al., B- and D-meson leptonic decay constants and quark masses from four-flavor lattice QCD, in 13th Conference on the Intersections of Particle and Nuclear Physics (CIPANP 2018) Palm Springs, California, USA, May 29–June 3, 2018, 2018. arXiv:1810.00250.Google Scholar

[50] Cirigliano, V., Ecker, G., Neufeld, H., Pich, A., and Portoles, J., Kaon decays in the standard model, Rev. Mod. Phys. 84 (2012) 399, [arXiv:1107.6001].Google Scholar

[51] Bernlochner, F. U., Ligeti, Z., Papucci, M., and Robinson, D. J., Combined analysis of semileptonic B decays to D and D∗: R(D^(∗)), |V _cb | , and new physics, Phys. Rev. D95 (2017), no. 11 115008, [arXiv:1703.05330].Google Scholar

[52] Gambino, P., Inclusive semileptonic B decays and |V _cb | : In memoriam Kolya Uraltsev, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A30 (2015), no. 10 1543002, [arXiv:1501.00314].Google Scholar

[53] Colangelo, P. and De Fazio, F., Tension in the inclusive versus exclusive determinations of |V _cb | : A possible role of new physics, Phys. Rev. D95 (2017), no. 1 011701, [arXiv:1611.07387].Google Scholar

[54] Bigi, D. and Gambino, P., Revisiting B → Dℓν , Phys. Rev. D94 (2016), no. 9 094008, [arXiv:1606.08030].Google Scholar

[55] Grinstein, B. and Kobach, A., Model-independent extraction of |V _cb | from (2017) 359–364, [arXiv:1703.08170]. Phys. Lett. B771 Google Scholar

[56] Ricciardi, G., Semileptonic decays and |V _xb | determinations, EPJ Web Conf. 182 (2018) 02104, [arXiv:1712.06988].Google Scholar

[57] Bigi, D., Gambino, P., and Schacht, S., A fresh look at the determination of |V _cb | from B → D ^∗ ℓν , Phys. Lett. B769 (2017) 441–445, [arXiv:1703.06124].Google Scholar

[58] Bigi, D., Gambino, P., and Schacht, S., R(D ^∗), |V _cb | , and the heavy quark symmetry relations between form factors, JHEP 11 (2017) 061, [arXiv:1707.09509].Google Scholar

[59] De Fazio, F., Theory overview of tree-level B decays, in 2017 European Physical Society Conference on High Energy Physics (EPS-HEP 2017) Venice, Italy, July 5–12, 2017, 2017. arXiv:1710.10017.Google Scholar

[60] Jung, M. and Straub, D. M., Constraining new physics in b → cℓν transitions, JHEP 01 (2019) 009, [arXiv:1801.01112].Google Scholar

[61] Fermilab Lattice, MILC Collaboration, Bailey, J. A. et al., Update of |V _cb | from the ν̅ form fac- tor at zero recoil with three-flavor lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D89 (2014) 114504, [arXiv:1403.0635].Google Scholar

[62] Fermilab Lattice, MILC Collaboration, Du, D. et al., B → πℓν semileptonic form factors from unquenched lattice QCD and determination of |V _ub | , PoS LATTICE2014 (2014) 385, [arXiv:1411.6038].Google Scholar

[63] Bailey, J., Bazavov, A., Bernard, C., Bouchard, C., DeTar, C., et al., B → πℓν semileptonic form factors from unquenched lattice QCD and determination of |V _ub | , arXiv:1411.6038.Google Scholar

[64] Aoki, S., Aoki, Y., Bernard, C., Blum, T., Colangelo, G., et al., Review of lattice results concerning low- energy particle physics, Eur. Phys. J. C74 (2014), no. 9 2890, [arXiv:1310.8555].Google Scholar

[65] Alberti, A., Gambino, P., Healey, K. J., and Nandi, S., Precision determination of the Cabibbo-Kobayashi- Maskawa element V _cb , Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 (2015) 061802, [arXiv:1411.6560].Google Scholar

[66] Caprini, I., Lellouch, L., and Neubert, M., Dispersive bounds on the shape of form-factors, Nucl. Phys. B530 (1998) 153–181, [hep-ph/9712417].Google Scholar

[67] Boyd, C. G., Grinstein, B., and Lebed, R. F., Constraints on form-factors for exclusive semileptonic heavy to light meson decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74 (1995) 4603–4606, [hep-ph/9412324].Google Scholar

[68] Bouchard, C., Cao, L., and Owen, P., Summary of the 2018 CKM working group on semileptonic and leptonic b-hadron decays, 2019. arXiv:1902.09412.Google Scholar

[69] Gambino, P., Jung, M., and Schacht, S., The V _cb puzzle: An update, arXiv:1905.08209.Google Scholar

[70] Muta, T., Foundations of Quantum Chromodynamics: An Introduction to Perturbative Methods in Gauge Theories (3rd ed.), vol. 78 of World Scientific Lecture Notes in Physics. World Scientific, Hackensack, NJ, 2010.Google Scholar

[71] Buras, A. J. and Weisz, P. H., QCD nonleading corrections to weak decays in dimensional regularization and’t Hooft-Veltman schemes, Nucl. Phys. B333 (1990) 66–99.Google Scholar

[72] Breitenlohner, P. and Maison, D., Dimensionally renormalized Green’s functions for theories with massless particles. 1, Commun. Math. Phys. 52 (1977) 39.Google Scholar

[73] Breitenlohner, P. and Maison, D., Dimensionally renormalized Green’s functions for theories with massless particles. 2, Commun. Math. Phys. 52 (1977) 55.Google Scholar

[74] Breitenlohner, P. and Maison, D., Dimensional renormalization and the action principle, Commun. Math. Phys. 52 (1977) 11–38.Google Scholar

[75] Bonneau, G., Consistency in dimensional regularization with γ ₅ , Phys. Lett. B96 (1980) 147–150.Google Scholar

[76] Bonneau, G., Preserving canonical ward identities in dimensional regularization with a nonanticommuting γ ₅ , Nucl. Phys. B177 (1981) 523–527.Google Scholar

[77] Buras, A. J., Climbing NLO and NNLO summits of weak decays, arXiv:1102.5650.Google Scholar

[78] Siegel, W., Supersymmetric dimensional regularization via dimensional reduction, Phys. Lett. B84 (1979) 193–196.Google Scholar

[79] Altarelli, G., Curci, G., Martinelli, G., and Petrarca, S., QCD nonleading corrections to weak decays as an application of regularization by dimensional reduction, Nucl. Phys. B187 (1981) 461–513.Google Scholar

[80] Nicolai, H. and Townsend, P. K., Anomalies and supersymmetric regularization by dimensional reduction, Phys. Lett. B93 (1980) 111–115.Google Scholar

[81] Majumdar, P., Poggio, E. C., and Schnitzer, H. J., The supersymmetry ward identity for the supersymmetric nonabelian gauge theory, Phys. Rev. D21 (1980) 2203.Google Scholar

[82] Grigjanis, R., O’Donnell, P. J., Sutherland, M., and Navelet, H., QCD corrected effective Lagrangian for B → s processes, Phys. Lett. B213 (1988) 355. [Erratum: Phys. Lett.B286,413(1992)].Google Scholar

[83] Misiak, M., On the dimensional methods in rare b decays, Phys. Lett. B321 (1994) 113–120, [hep-ph/9309236].Google Scholar

[84] Hooft, G.’t and Veltman, M. J. G., Regularization and renormalization of gauge fields, Nucl. Phys. B44 (1972) 189–213.Google Scholar

[85] Akyeampong, D. A. and Delbourgo, R., Anomalies via dimensional regularization, Nuovo Cim. A19 (1974) 219–224.Google Scholar

[86] Akyeampong, D. A. and Delbourgo, R., Dimensional regularization and PCAC, Nuovo Cim. A18 (1973) 94–104.Google Scholar

[87] Akyeampong, D. A. and Delbourgo, R., Dimensional regularization, abnormal amplitudes and anomalies, Nuovo Cim. A17 (1973) 578–586.Google Scholar

[88] Körner, J. G., Nasrallah, N., and Schilcher, K., Evaluation of the flavor changing vertex b → sH using the Breitenlohner-Maison-’t Hooft-Veltman γ ₅ scheme, Phys. Rev. D41 (1990) 888.Google Scholar

[89] Jamin, M. and Lautenbacher, M. E., TRACER: Version 1.1: A Mathematica package for gamma algebra in arbitrary dimensions, Comput. Phys. Commun. 74 (1993) 265–288.Google Scholar

[90] Collins, J. C., Renormalization, vol. 26 of Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1986.Google Scholar

[91] Weinberg, S., Phenomenological Lagrangians, Physica A96 (1979) 327–340.Google Scholar

[92] Hooft, G.’t, Dimensional regularization and the renormalization group, Nucl. Phys. B61 (1973) 455–468.Google Scholar

[93] Weinberg, S., New approach to the renormalization group, Phys. Rev. D8 (1973) 3497–3509.Google Scholar

[94] Bardeen, W. A., Buras, A. J., Duke, D. W., and Muta, T., Deep inelastic scattering beyond the leading order in asymptotically free gauge theories, Phys. Rev. D18 (1978) 3998.Google Scholar

[95] Jones, D. R. T., Two loop diagrams in Yang-Mills theory, Nucl. Phys. B75 (1974) 531.Google Scholar

[96] Tarrach, R., The pole mass in perturbative QCD, Nucl. Phys. B183 (1981) 384–396.Google Scholar

[97] Tarasov, O. V., Vladimirov, A. A., and Zharkov, A. Yu., The Gell-Mann-Low function of QCD in the three loop approximation, Phys. Lett. B93 (1980) 429–432.Google Scholar

[98] Larin, S. A. and Vermaseren, J. A. M., The three loop QCD Beta function and anomalous dimensions, Phys. Lett. B303 (1993) 334–336, [hep-ph/9302208].Google Scholar

[99] van Ritbergen, T., Vermaseren, J. A. M., and Larin, S. A., The four loop beta function in quantum chromodynamics, Phys. Lett. B400 (1997) 379–384, [hep-ph/9701390].Google Scholar

[100] Czakon, M., The four-loop QCD beta-function and anomalous dimensions, Nucl. Phys. B710 (2005) 485–498, [hep-ph/0411261].Google Scholar

[101] Baikov, P. A., Chetyrkin, K. G., and Kühn, J. H., Five-loop running of the QCD coupling constant, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (2017), no. 8 082002, [arXiv:1606.08659].Google Scholar

[102] Herzog, F., Ruijl, B., Ueda, T., Vermaseren, J. A. M., and Vogt, A., The five-loop beta function of Yang-Mills theory with fermions, JHEP 02 (2017) 090, [arXiv:1701.01404].Google Scholar

[103] Larin, S. A., The renormalization of the axial anomaly in dimensional regularization, Phys. Lett. B303 (1993) 113–118, [hep-ph/9302240].Google Scholar

[104] Chetyrkin, K. G., Quark mass anomalous dimension to O(α⁴ _s), Phys. Lett. B404 (1997) 161–165, [hep-ph/9703278].Google Scholar

[105] Vermaseren, J. A. M., Larin, S. A., and van Ritbergen, T., The four loop quark mass anomalous dimension and the invariant quark mass, Phys. Lett. B405 (1997) 327–333, [hep-ph/9703284].Google Scholar

[106] Baikov, P. A., Chetyrkin, K. G., and Kühn, J. H., Quark mass and field anomalous dimensions to O(α⁵ _s), JHEP 10 (2014) 076, [arXiv:1402.6611].Google Scholar

[107] Wilson, K. G., Nonlagrangian models of current algebra, Phys. Rev. 179 (1969) 1499–1512.Google Scholar

[108] Wilson, K. G. and Zimmermann, W., Operator product expansions and composite field operators in the general framework of quantum field theory, Commun. Math. Phys. 24 (1972) 87–106.Google Scholar

[109] Zimmermann, W., Normal products and the short distance expansion in the perturbation theory of renormalizable interactions, Annals Phys. 77 (1973) 570–601. [Lect. Notes Phys. 558, 278(2000)].Google Scholar

[110] Witten, E., Short distance analysis of weak interactions, Nucl. Phys. B122 (1977) 109–143.Google Scholar

[111] Buchalla, G., Buras, A. J., and Lautenbacher, M. E., Weak decays beyond leading logarithms, Rev. Mod. Phys. 68 (1996) 1125–1144, [hep-ph/9512380].Google Scholar

[112] Petrov, A. A. and Blechman, A. E., Effective Field Theories. WSP, 2016.Google Scholar

[113] Appelquist, T. and Carazzone, J., Infrared singularities and massive fields, Phys. Rev. D11 (1975) 2856.Google Scholar

[114] Wilson, K. G., The renormalization group and critical phenomena, Rev. Mod. Phys. 55 (1983) 583–600.Google Scholar

[115] Marciano, W. J., Dimensional Regularization and Mass Singularities, Phys. Rev. D12 (1975) 3861.Google Scholar

[116] Buchalla, G. and Buras, A. J., QCD Corrections to the dZ vertex for arbitrary top quark mass, Nucl. Phys. B398 (1993) 285–300.Google Scholar

[117] Greub, C. and Hurth, T., Two loop matching of the dipole operators for b → sγ and b → sg , Phys. Rev. D56 (1997) 2934–2949, [hep-ph/9703349].Google Scholar

[118] Buras, A. J., Kwiatkowski, A., and Pott, N., Next-to-leading order matching for the magnetic photon penguin operator in the B → Xs γ decay, Nucl. Phys. B517 (1998) 353–373, [hep-ph/9710336].Google Scholar

[119] Altarelli, G. and Maiani, L., Octet enhancement of nonleptonic weak interactions in asymptotically free gauge theories, Phys. Lett. B52 (1974) 351–354.Google Scholar

[120] Gaillard, M. and Lee, B. W., ΔI = 1/2 rule for nonleptonic decays in asymptotically free field theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 33 (1974) 108.Google Scholar

[121] Buras, A. J., Asymptotic freedom in deep inelastic processes in the leading order and beyond, Rev. Mod. Phys. 52 (1980) 199.Google Scholar

[122] Buras, A. J., Jamin, M., Lautenbacher, M. E., and Weisz, P. H., Effective Hamiltonians for ΔS = 1 and ΔB = 1 nonleptonic decays beyond the leading logarithmic approximation, Nucl. Phys. B370 (1992) 69–104. [Addendum: Nucl. Phys. B375, 501(1992)].Google Scholar

[123] Buras, A. J., Jamin, M., and Lautenbacher, M. E., The anatomy of ε′/ε beyond leading logarithms with improved hadronic matrix elements, Nucl. Phys. B408 (1993) 209–285, [hep-ph/9303284].Google Scholar

[124] Ciuchini, M., Franco, E., Martinelli, G., and Reina, L., ε′/ε at the next-to-leading order in QCD and QED, Phys. Lett. B301 (1993) 263–271, [hep-ph/9212203].Google Scholar

[125] M. Ciuchini, , E. Franco, , G. Martinelli, , and L. Reina, , The ΔS = 1 effective Hamiltonian including next- to-leading order QCD and QED corrections, Nucl. Phys. B415 (1994) 403–462, [hep-ph/9304257].Google Scholar

[126] Tracas, N. and Vlachos, N., Two loop calculations in QCD and the ΔI = 1/2 rule in nonleptonic weak decays, Phys. Lett. B115 (1982) 419.Google Scholar

[127] Buras, A. J. and Münz, M., Effective Hamiltonian for B → X _se+e− beyond leading logarithms in the NDR and HV schemes, Phys. Rev. D52 (1995) 186–195, [hep-ph/9501281].Google Scholar

[128] Buras, A. J., Kwiatkowski, A., and Pott, N., On the scale uncertainties in the B → Xs γ decay, Phys. Lett. B414 (1997) 157–165, [hep-ph/9707482]. [Erratum: Phys. Lett.B434,459(1998)].Google Scholar

[129] Dugan, M. J. and Grinstein, B., On the vanishing of evanescent operators, Phys. Lett. B256 (1991) 239–244.Google Scholar

[130] Herrlich, S. and Nierste, U., Evanescent operators, scheme dependences and double insertions, Nucl. Phys. B455 (1995) 39–58, [hep-ph/9412375].Google Scholar

[131] Buras, A. J., Lautenbacher, M. E., Misiak, M., and Münz, M., Direct CP violation in beyond leading logarithms, Nucl. Phys. B423 (1994) 349–383, [hep-ph/9402347].Google Scholar

[132] Inami, T. and Lim, C., Effects of superheavy quarks and leptons in low-energy weak processes K _L → μ ⁺ μ ⁻ K+ → π+ v̅, and K ⁰ – K̅ ⁰ , Prog. Theor. Phys. 65 (1981) 297.Google Scholar

[133] Buchalla, G., Buras, A. J., and Harlander, M. K., Penguin box expansion: Flavor changing neutral current processes and a heavy top quark, Nucl. Phys. B349 (1991) 1–47.Google Scholar

[134] Buchalla, G. and Buras, A. J., Two-loop large-mt electroweak corrections to for arbitrary Higgs boson mass, Phys. Rev. D57 (1998) 216–223, [hep-ph/9707243].Google Scholar

[135] Brod, J., Gorbahn, M., and Stamou, E., Two-loop electroweak corrections for the decays, Phys. Rev. D83 (2011) 034030, [arXiv:1009.0947].Google Scholar

[136] Brod, J. and Gorbahn, M., The Z penguin in generic extensions of the standard model, arXiv:1903.05116.Google Scholar

[137] Buras, A. J., Jamin, M., and Weisz, P. H., Leading and next-to-leading QCD corrections to ε parameter and mixing in the presence of a heavy top quark, Nucl. Phys. B347 (1990) 491–536.Google Scholar

[138] Lenz, A., Nierste, U., Charles, J., Descotes-Genon, S., Jantsch, A., et al., Anatomy of new physics in mixing, Phys. Rev. D83 (2011) 036004, [arXiv:1008.1593].Google Scholar

[139] Herrlich, S. and Nierste, U., Enhancement of the K _L − K _S mass difference by short distance QCD corrections beyond leading logarithms, Nucl. Phys. B419 (1994) 292–322, [hep-ph/9310311].CrossRefGoogle Scholar

[140] Herrlich, S. and Nierste, U., Indirect CP violation in the neutral kaon system beyond leading logarithms, Phys. Rev. D52 (1995) 6505–6518, [hep-ph/9507262].Google Scholar

[141] Herrlich, S. and Nierste, U., The Complete |ΔS | = 2 Hamiltonian in the next-to-leading order, Nucl. Phys. B476 (1996) 27–88, [hep-ph/9604330].Google Scholar

[142] Urban, J., Krauss, F., Jentschura, U., and Soff, G., Next-to-leading order QCD corrections for the mixing with an extended Higgs sector, Nucl. Phys. B523 (1998) 40–58, [hep-ph/9710245].Google Scholar

[143] Brod, J. and Gorbahn, M., ϵ _K at Next-to-next-to-leading order: The charm-top-quark contribution, Phys. Rev. D82 (2010) 094026, [arXiv:1007.0684].Google Scholar

[144] Brod, J. and Gorbahn, M., Next-to-next-to-leading-order charm-quark contribution to the CP violation parameter ε _K and ΔM _K , Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 121801, [arXiv:1108.2036].Google Scholar

[145] Shifman, M. A., Vainshtein, A. I., and Zakharov, V. I., Nonleptonic decays of K mesons and hyperons, Sov. Phys. JETP 45 (1977) 670. [Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.72,1275(1977)].Google Scholar

[146] Buras, A. J., Jamin, M., Lautenbacher, M. E., and Weisz, P. H., Two loop anomalous dimension matrix for ΔS = 1 weak nonleptonic decays. 1. O(α² _s), Nucl. Phys. B400 (1993) 37–74, [hep-ph/9211304].Google Scholar

[147] Chetyrkin, K. G., Misiak, M., and Münz, M., Weak radiative B meson decay beyond leading logarithms, Phys. Lett. B400 (1997) 206–219, [hep-ph/9612313]. [Erratum: Phys. Lett.B425,414(1998)].Google Scholar

[148] Fleischer, R., CP violation and the role of electroweak penguins in nonleptonic B decays, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A12 (1997) 2459–2522, [hep-ph/9612446].Google Scholar

[149] Misiak, M. et al., Updated NNLO QCD predictions for the weak radiative B-meson decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 (2015), no. 22 221801, [arXiv:1503.01789].Google Scholar

[150] HFLAV Collaboration, Amhis, Y. et al., Averages of b-hadron, c-hadron, and τ-lepton properties as of summer 2016, Eur. Phys. J. C77 (2017), no. 12 895, [arXiv:1612.07233].Google Scholar

[151] Bertolini, S., Borzumati, F., and Masiero, A., QCD enhancement of radiative b decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59 (1987) 180.Google Scholar

[152] Deshpande, N. G., Lo, P., Trampetic, J., Eilam, G., and Singer, P., B → K ^∗ γ and the top quark mass, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59 (1987) 183–185.Google Scholar

[153] Ciuchini, M., Franco, E., Martinelli, G., Reina, L., and Silvestrini, L., Scheme independence of the effective Hamiltonian for b → s _γ and b → s _g decays, Phys. Lett. B316 (1993) 127–136, [hep-ph/9307364].Google Scholar

[154] Ciuchini, M., Franco, E., Reina, L., and Silvestrini, L., Leading order QCD corrections to b → s _γ and b → s _g decays in three regularization schemes, Nucl. Phys. B421 (1994) 41–64, [hep-ph/9311357].Google Scholar

[155] Cella, G., Curci, G., Ricciardi, G., and Vicere, A., The b → s _γ decay revisited, Phys. Lett. B325 (1994) 227–234, [hep-ph/9401254].Google Scholar

[156] Cella, G., Curci, G., Ricciardi, G., and Vicere, A., QCD corrections to electroweak processes in an unconventional scheme: Application to the b → s _γ decay, Nucl. Phys. B431 (1994) 417–452, [hep-ph/9406203].Google Scholar

[157] Misiak, M., The b → se+e− and b → sγ decays with next-to-leading logarithmic QCD corrections, Nucl. Phys. B393 (1993) 23–45. [Erratum: Nucl. Phys.B439,461(1995)].Google Scholar

[158] Ali, A. and Greub, C., A determination of the CKM matrix element ratio |V _{t s} | /|V _cb | from the rare B decays B → K ^∗ γ and B → X _s γ , Z. Phys. C60 (1993) 433–442.Google Scholar

[159] Buras, A. J., Misiak, M., Münz, M., and Pokorski, S., Theoretical uncertainties and phenomenological aspects of B → X _s γ decay, Nucl. Phys. B424 (1994) 374–398, [hep-ph/9311345].Google Scholar

[160] Buras, A. J. and Misiak, M., B̅ → X _s γ after completion of the NLO QCD calculations, Acta Phys. Polon. B33 (2002) 2597–2612, [hep-ph/0207131].Google Scholar

[161] Adel, K. and Yao, Y.-P., Exact α _s calculation of b → sγ and b → sg , Phys. Rev. D49 (1994) 4945–4948, [hep-ph/9308349].Google Scholar

[162] Ciuchini, M., Degrassi, G., Gambino, P., and Giudice, G. F., Next-to-leading QCD corrections to B → X _s γ: Standard model and two Higgs doublet model, Nucl. Phys. B527 (1998) 21–43, [hep-ph/9710335].Google Scholar

[163] Misiak, M. and Münz, M., Two loop mixing of dimension five flavor changing operators, Phys. Lett. B344 (1995) 308–318, [hep-ph/9409454].Google Scholar

[164] Gambino, P., Gorbahn, M., and Haisch, U., Anomalous dimension matrix for radiative and rare semilep- tonic B decays up to three loops, Nucl. Phys. B673 (2003) 238–262, [hep-ph/0306079].Google Scholar

[165] Chetyrkin, K. G., Misiak, M., and Münz, M., Beta functions and anomalous dimensions up to three loops, Nucl. Phys. B518 (1998) 473–494, [hep-ph/9711266].Google Scholar

[166] Ali, A. and Greub, C., Photon energy spectrum in B → Xs γ and comparison with data, Phys. Lett. B361 (1995) 146–154, [hep-ph/9506374].Google Scholar

[167] Pott, N., Bremsstrahlung corrections to the decay b → sγ , Phys. Rev. D54 (1996) 938–948, [hep-ph/9512252].Google Scholar

[168] Greub, C., Hurth, T., and Wyler, D., Virtual Corrections to the decay b → sγ , Phys. Lett. B380 (1996) 385–392, [hep-ph/9602281].Google Scholar

[169] Greub, C., Hurth, T., and Wyler, D., Virtual O(αs) Corrections to the inclusive decay b → sγ , Phys. Rev. D54 (1996) 3350–3364, [hep-ph/9603404].Google Scholar

[170] Buras, A. J., Czarnecki, A., Misiak, M., and Urban, J., Two-loop matrix element of the current-current operator in the decay B̅ → Xsγ , Nucl. Phys. B611 (2001) 488–502, [hep-ph/0105160].Google Scholar

[171] Buras, A. J., Czarnecki, A., Misiak, M., and Urban, J., Completing the NLO QCD Calculation of B̅ → Xsγ , Nucl. Phys. B631 (2002) 219–238, [hep-ph/0203135].Google Scholar

[172] Gambino, P. and Misiak, M., Quark mass effects in B̅ → Xsγ , Nucl. Phys. B611 (2001) 338–366, [hep-ph/0104034].Google Scholar

[173] Misiak, M. and Steinhauser, M., NNLO QCD corrections to the matrix elements using interpolation in m _c , Nucl. Phys. B764 (2007) 62–82, [hep-ph/0609241].Google Scholar

[174] Grinstein, B., Springer, R. P., and Wise, M. B., Strong interaction effects in weak radiative meson decay, Nucl. Phys. B339 (1990) 269–309.Google Scholar

[175] Cabibbo, N. and Maiani, L., The lifetime of charmed particles, Phys. Lett. B79 (1978) 109–111.Google Scholar

[176] Kim, C. S. and Martin, A. D., On the determination of V _ub and V _cb from semileptonic B decays, Phys. Lett. B225 (1989) 186–190.Google Scholar

[177] Nir, Y., The mass ratio m _c /m _b in semileptonic B decays, Phys. Lett. B221 (1989) 184–190.Google Scholar

[178] Kagan, A. L. and Neubert, M., QCD anatomy of decays, Eur. Phys. J. C7 (1999) 5–27, [hep-ph/9805303].Google Scholar

[179] Borzumati, F. and Greub, C., 2HDMs predictions for in NLO QCD, Phys. Rev. D58 (1998) 074004, [hep-ph/9802391].Google Scholar

[180] Czarnecki, A. and Marciano, W. J., Electroweak radiative corrections to b → sγ , Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 (1998) 277–280, [hep-ph/9804252].Google Scholar

[181] Buchalla, G. and Buras, A. J., The rare decays K → πv̅v , B → Xv̅v, and B → ℓ+ℓ−: An update, Nucl. Phys. B548 (1999) 309–327, [hep-ph/9901288].Google Scholar

[182] Misiak, M. and Urban, J., QCD corrections to FCNC decays mediated by Z penguins and W boxes, Phys. Lett. B451 (1999) 161–169, [hep-ph/9901278].Google Scholar

[183] Bobeth, C., Gambino, P., Gorbahn, M., and Haisch, U., Complete NNLO QCD analysis of and higher order electroweak effects, JHEP 04 (2004) 071, [hep-ph/0312090].Google Scholar

[184] Huber, T., Lunghi, E., Misiak, M., and Wyler, D., Electromagnetic logarithms in B̅ → X _s l+l− , Nucl. Phys. B740 (2006) 105–137, [hep-ph/0512066].Google Scholar

[185] Misiak, M., Rare B-meson decays, in Proceedings, 15th Lomonosov Conference on Elementary Particle Physics (LomCon): Particle Physics at the Tercentenary of Mikhail Lomonosov, pp. 301–305, 2013. arXiv:1112.5978.Google Scholar

[186] Buras, A. J., Girrbach, J., Guadagnoli, D., and Isidori, G., On the standard model prediction for B(B _s,d → μ ⁺ μ ⁻ ), Eur. Phys. J. C72 (2012) 2172, [arXiv:1208.0934].Google Scholar

[187] Bobeth, C., Gorbahn, M., and Stamou, E., Electroweak corrections to B _s,d → ℓ ⁺ ℓ ⁻ , Phys. Rev. D89 (2014) 034023, [arXiv:1311.1348].Google Scholar

[188] Hermann, T., Misiak, M., and Steinhauser, M., Three-loop QCD corrections to B _s → μ ⁺ μ ⁻ , JHEP 1312 (2013) 097, [arXiv:1311.1347].Google Scholar

[189] Bobeth, C., Gorbahn, M., Hermann, T., Misiak, M., Stamou, E., et al., B _s,d → ℓ ⁺ ℓ ⁻ in the standard model with reduced theoretical uncertainty, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (2014) 101801, [arXiv:1311.0903].Google Scholar

[190] Buras, A. J., De Fazio, F., and Girrbach, J., 331 models facing new b → sμ ⁺ μ ⁻ data, JHEP 1402 (2014) 112, [arXiv:1311.6729].Google Scholar

[191] Dib, C., Dunietz, I., and Gilman, F. J., CP violation in the KL → π ₀ ℓ ⁺ ℓ ⁻ decay amplitude for large m _t , Phys. Lett. B218 (1989) 487–492.Google Scholar

[192] Flynn, J. and Randall, L., The CP violating contribution to the decay K _L → π ₀ e ⁺ e ⁻ , Nucl. Phys. B326 (1989) 31. [Erratum: Nucl. Phys.B334,580(1990)].Google Scholar

[193] Buchalla, G. and Buras, A. J., sin 2β from K → πν v̅, Phys. Lett. B333 (1994) 221–227, [hep-ph/9405259].Google Scholar

[194] Ellis, J. R. and Hagelin, J. S., Constraints on light particles from kaon decays, Nucl. Phys. B217 (1983) 189–214.Google Scholar

[195] Dib, C., Dunietz, I., and Gilman, F. J., Strong interaction corrections to the decay K → π neutrino anti-neutrino for large m _t , Mod. Phys. Lett. A6 (1991) 3573–3582.Google Scholar

[196] Buchalla, G. and Buras, A. J., QCD corrections to rare K and B decays for arbitrary top quark mass, Nucl. Phys. B400 (1993) 225–239.Google Scholar

[197] Buchalla, G. and Buras, A. J., The rare decays K ⁺ → π ⁺ v v̅ and K _L → μ ⁺ μ ⁻ beyond leading logarithms, Nucl. Phys. B412 (1994) 106–142, [hep-ph/9308272].Google Scholar

[198] Buras, A. J., Gorbahn, M., U. Haisch, and U. Nierste, The rare decay K ⁺ → π ⁺ v v̅ at the next-to-next-to-leading order in QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 (2005) 261805, [hep-ph/0508165].Google Scholar

[199] Buras, A. J., Gorbahn, M., Haisch, U., and Nierste, U., Charm quark contribution to K ⁺ → π ⁺ v v̅ at next-to-next-to-leading order, JHEP 11 (2006) 002, [hep-ph/0603079].Google Scholar

[200] Gorbahn, M. and Haisch, U., Effective Hamiltonian for non-leptonic |ΔF | = 1 decays at NNLO in QCD, Nucl. Phys. B713 (2005) 291–332, [hep-ph/0411071].Google Scholar

[201] Isidori, G., Mescia, F., and Smith, C., Light-quark loops in K → πν v̅, Nucl. Phys. B718 (2005) 319–338, [hep-ph/0503107].Google Scholar

[202] Mescia, F. and Smith, C., Improved estimates of rare K decay matrix-elements from K _ℓ3 decays, Phys. Rev. D76 (2007) 034017, [arXiv:0705.2025].Google Scholar

[203] Brod, J. and Gorbahn, M., Electroweak corrections to the charm quark contribution to K ⁺ → π ⁺ v v̅, Phys. Rev. D78 (2008) 034006, [arXiv:0805.4119].Google Scholar

[204] Ceccucci, A., Review and outlook on kaon physics, Acta Phys. Polon. B49 (2018) 1079–1086.Google Scholar

[205] Komatsubara, T., Experiments with K-meson decays, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 67 (2012) 995–1018, [arXiv:1203.6437].Google Scholar

[206] KOTO Collaboration, Shiomi, K., K _L ⁰ → π ⁰ v v̅ at KOTO, in 8th International Workshop on the CKM Unitarity Triangle (CKM 2014) Vienna, Austria, September 8–12, 2014, 2014. arXiv:1411.4250.Google Scholar

[207] Buras, A. J., Schwab, F., and Uhlig, S., Waiting for precise measurements of K ⁺ → π ⁺ v v̅ and K _L → π ⁰ v v̅ , Rev. Mod. Phys. 80 (2008) 965–1007, [hep-ph/0405132].Google Scholar

[208] Buras, A. J. and Girrbach, J., Towards the identification of new physics through quark flavour violating processes, Rept. Prog. Phys. 77 (2014) 086201, [arXiv:1306.3775].Google Scholar

[209] Blanke, M., New physics signatures in kaon decays, PoS KAON13 (2013) 010, [arXiv:1305.5671].Google Scholar

[210] Smith, C., Rare K decays: Challenges and perspectives, arXiv:1409.6162.Google Scholar

[211] Buras, A. J., Buttazzo, D., Girrbach-Noe, J., and Knegjens, R., Can we reach the Zeptouniverse with rare K and B _s,d decays? JHEP 1411 (2014) 121, [arXiv:1408.0728].Google Scholar

[212] Buras, A. J., Buttazzo, D., Girrbach-Noe, J., and Knegjens, R., K ⁺ → π ⁺ νν and K _L → π ⁰ νν in the standard model: Status and perspectives, JHEP 11 (2015) 033, [arXiv:1503.02693].Google Scholar

[213] Isidori, G., Martinelli, G., and Turchetti, P., Rare kaon decays on the lattice, Phys. Lett. B633 (2006) 75–83, [hep-lat/0506026].Google Scholar

[214] RBC, UKQCD Collaboration, Christ, N. H., Feng, X., Portelli, A., and Sachrajda, C. T., Prospects for a lattice computation of rare kaon decay amplitudes II K → πν v̅ decays, Phys. Rev. D93 (2016), no. 11 114517, [arXiv:1605.04442].Google Scholar

[215] Chetyrkin, K., Kühn, J., Maier, A., Maierhofer, P., Marquard, P., et al., Charm and bottom quark masses: An update, Phys. Rev. D80 (2009) 074010, [arXiv:0907.2110].Google Scholar

[216] Buras, A. J. and Fleischer, R., Bounds on the unitarity triangle, sin 2β and K → πν v̅ decays in models with minimal flavor violation, Phys. Rev. D64 (2001) 115010, [hep-ph/0104238].Google Scholar

[217] Hooft, G.’t, A planar diagram theory for strong interactions, Nucl. Phys. B72 (1974) 461.Google Scholar

[218] Hooft, G.’t, A two-dimensional model for mesons, Nucl. Phys. B75 (1974) 461.Google Scholar

[219] Witten, E., Baryons in the 1/N expansion, Nucl. Phys. B160 (1979) 57.Google Scholar

[220] Treiman, S. B., Witten, E., Jackiw, R., and Zumino, B., Current algebra and anomalies. 1986.Google Scholar

[221] Bardeen, W. A., Buras, A. J., and Gérard, J.-M., A consistent analysis of the ΔI = 1/2 rule for K decays, Phys. Lett. B192 (1987) 138.Google Scholar

[222] Fukugita, M., Inami, T., Sakai, N., and Yazaki, S., Nonleptonic decays of kaons in the 1/N expansion, Phys. Lett. B72 (1977) 237.Google Scholar

[223] Nilles, H. P. and Visnjic-Triantafillou, V., Nonleptonic weak decays in QCD in two-dimensions, Phys. Rev. D19 (1979) 969.Google Scholar

[224] Tadic, D. and Trampetic, J., Weak meson decays and the 1/N expansion, Phys. Lett. B114 (1982) 179.Google Scholar

[225] Buras, A. J., Gérard, J.-M., and Rückl, R., 1/N expansion for exclusive and inclusive charm decays, Nucl. Phys. B268 (1986) 16.Google Scholar

[226] Wirbel, M., Stech, B., and Bauer, M., Exclusive semileptonic decays of heavy mesons, Z. Phys. C29 (1985) 637.Google Scholar

[227] Bardeen, W. A., Buras, A. J., and Gérard, J.-M., The ΔI = 1/2 rule in the large N limit, Phys. Lett. B180 (1986) 133.Google Scholar

[228] Bardeen, W. A., Buras, A. J., and Gérard, J.-M., The K → ππ decays in the large N limit: Quark evolution, Nucl. Phys. B293 (1987) 787.Google Scholar

[229] Bardeen, W. A., Buras, A. J., and Gérard, J.-M., The B parameter beyond the leading order of 1/N expansion, Phys. Lett. B211 (1988) 343.Google Scholar

[230] Buras, A. J. and Gérard, J.-M., 1/N expansion for kaons, Nucl. Phys. B264 (1986) 371.Google Scholar

[231] Gaiser, B. D., Tsao, T., and Wise, M. B., Parameters of the six quark model, Annals Phys. 132 (1981) 66.Google Scholar

[232] Buras, A. J., The 1/N approach to nonleptonic weak interactions, Adv. Ser. Direct. High Energy Phys. 3 (1989) 575–645.Google Scholar

[233] Buras, A. J., Phenomenological applications of the 1/N expansion, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 10A (1989) 199–267.Google Scholar

[234] Bardeen, W. A., Weak decay amplitudes in large N QCD, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 7A (1989) 149.Google Scholar

[235] Buras, A. J., Strangeness and the large N expansion, Nucl. Phys. A479 (1988) 399C–421C.Google Scholar

[236] Gérard, J.-M., Electroweak interactions of hadrons, Acta Phys. Polon. B21 (1990) 257–305.Google Scholar

[237] Bardeen, W. A., Weak matrix elements in the large N _c limit, Proceedings KAON99 (1999) 171–176.Google Scholar

[238] Bardeen, W. A., On the large N _c expansion in quantum chromodynamics, Fortsch. Phys. 50 (2002) 483–488, [hep-ph/0112229].Google Scholar

[239] Buras, A. J., Gérard, J.-M., and Bardeen, W. A., Large N approach to kaon decays and mixing 28 years later: ΔI = 1/2 rule, B̂ _K and ΔM _K , Eur. Phys. J. C74 (2014), no. 5 2871, [arXiv:1401.1385].Google Scholar

[240] Buras, A. J., ΔI = 1/2 rule andB̂ _K : 2014, in Proceedings, 7th International Workshop on Quantum Chromodynamics Theory and Experiment (QCD@Work 2014): Giovinazzo, Bari, Italy, June 16–19, 2014, 2014. arXiv:1408.4820.Google Scholar

[241] Shifman, M. A., Vainshtein, A., and Zakharov, V. I., Light quarks and the origin of the ΔI = 1/2 rule in the nonleptonic decays of strange particles, Nucl. Phys. B120 (1977) 316.Google Scholar

[242] Fajfer, S. and Gérard, J.-M., A simple chiral Lagrangian approach to K → πππ decays and ɛ ′ +0-, Z. Phys. C42 (1989) 425.Google Scholar

[243] Bijnens, J., Gérard, J.-M., and Klein, G., The K _L − K _S mass difference, Phys. Lett. B257 (1991) 191–195.Google Scholar

[244] Buras, A. J. and Gérard, J.-M., Upper bounds on ε ′ /ε parameters B ₆ ^(1/2) and B ₈ ^(3/2) from large N QCD and other news, JHEP 12 (2015) 008, [arXiv:1507.06326].Google Scholar

[245] Buras, A. J. and Gérard, J.-M., Final state interactions in K′ → ππ decays: ΔI = 1/2 rule vs. ε ′ /ε , Eur. Phys. J. C77 (2017), no. 1 10, [arXiv:1603.05686].Google Scholar

[246] Aebischer, J., Buras, A. J., and Gérard, J.-M., BSM Hadronic matrix elements for ε ′ /ε and K → ππ decays in the dual QCD approach, JHEP 02 (2019) 021, [arXiv:1807.01709].Google Scholar

[247] Gisbert, H. and Pich, A., Direct CP violation in K ⁰ → ππ: Standard model status, Rept. Prog. Phys. 81 (2018), no. 7 076201, [arXiv:1712.06147].Google Scholar

[248] Bijnens, J. and Guberina, B., Chiral perturbation theory and the evaluation of 1/N _c corrections to nonleptonic decays, Phys. Lett. B205 (1988) 103.Google Scholar

[249] Pich, A. and de Rafael, E., Weak K amplitudes in the chiral and 1/N expansions, Phys. Lett. B374 (1996) 186–192, [hep-ph/9511465].Google Scholar

[250] Bijnens, J. and Prades, J., The B _K parameter in the 1/N expansion, Nucl. Phys. B444 (1995) 523–562, [hep-ph/9502363].Google Scholar

[251] Bijnens, J. and Prades, J., The ΔI = 1/2 rule in the chiral limit, JHEP 9901 (1999) 023, [hep-ph/9811472].Google Scholar

[252] Hambye, T., Kohler, G., Paschos, E., Soldan, P., and W. A. Bardeen, 1/N corrections to the hadronic matrix elements of Q ₆ and Q ₈ in K → ππ decays, Phys. Rev. D58 (1998) 014017, [hep-ph/9802300].Google Scholar

[253] Hambye, T., Kohler, G., and Soldan, P., New analysis of the ΔI = 1/2 rule in kaon decays and the ̂B _K parameter, Eur. Phys. J. C10 (1999) 271–292, [hep-ph/9902334].Google Scholar

[254] Peris, S. and de, E. Rafael, K ⁰ − K̅ ⁰ mixing in the 1/N expansion, Phys. Lett. B490 (2000) 213–222, [hep-ph/0006146].Google Scholar

[255] Cirigliano, V., F, J.. Donoghue, E. Golowich, and K. Maltman, Improved determination of the electroweak penguin contribution to ε ′ /ε in the chiral limit, Phys. Lett. B555 (2003) 71–82, [hep-ph/0211420].Google Scholar

[256] Hambye, T., Peris, S., and E. de Rafael, ΔI = 1/2 and ε ′ /ε in large N QCD, JHEP 05 (2003) 027, [hep-ph/0305104].Google Scholar

[257] Lucini, B. and Panero, M., SU(N) gauge theories at large N, Phys. Rept. 526 (2013) 93–163, [arXiv:1210.4997].Google Scholar

[258] Coleman, S. R. and Witten, E., Chiral symmetry breakdown in large N chromodynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 45 (1980) 100.Google Scholar

[259] Witten, E., Anti-de Sitter space, thermal phase transition, and confinement in gauge theories, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 505–532, [hep-th/9803131].Google Scholar

[260] Polchinski, J. and Strassler, M. J., Hard scattering and gauge / string duality, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 (2002) 031601, [hep-th/0109174].Google Scholar

[261] Hambye, T., Hassanain, B., J. March-Russell, and M. Schvellinger, On the ΔI = 1/2 rule in holographic QCD, Phys. Rev. D74 (2006) 026003, [hep-ph/0512089].Google Scholar

[262] Hambye, T., Hassanain, B., J. March-Russell, and M. Schvellinger, Four-point functions and kaon decays in a minimal AdS/QCD model, Phys. Rev. D76 (2007) 125017, [hep-ph/0612010].Google Scholar

[263] Fatelo, J. P. and Gérard, J. M., Current current operator evolution in the chiral limit, Phys. Lett. B347 (1995) 136–142.Google Scholar

[264] Chivukula, R. S., Flynn, J., and Georgi, H., Polychromatic penguins don’t fly, Phys. Lett. B171 (1986) 453–458.Google Scholar

[265] Gasser, J. and Leutwyler, H., Chiral perturbation theory to one loop, Annals Phys. 158 (1984) 142.Google Scholar

[266] Gell-Mann, M. and Pais, A., Behavior of neutral particles under charge conjugation, Phys. Rev. 97 (1955) 1387–1389.Google Scholar

[267] Gell-Mann, M. and Rosenfeld, A., Hyperons and heavy mesons (systematics and decay), Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 7 (1957) 407–478.Google Scholar

[268] Fermi, E., An attempt of a theory of beta radiation. 1., Z. Phys. 88 (1934) 161–177.Google Scholar

[269] Feynman, R. P. and Gell-Mann, M., Theory of Fermi interaction, Phys. Rev. 109 (1958) 193–198.Google Scholar

[270] Sudarshan, E. C. G. and e, R.. Marshak, Chirality invariance and the universal Fermi interaction, Phys. Rev. 109 (1958) 1860–1860.Google Scholar

[271] Buras, A. J., De Fazio, F., and Girrbach, J., ΔI = 1/2 rule, ε ′ /ε and K → πν v̅ in Z ′ (Z) and G ′ models with FCNC quark couplings, Eur. Phys. J. C74 (2014) 2950, [arXiv:1404.3824].Google Scholar

[272] Gérard, J.-M., An upper bound on the kaon B-parameter and Re(ɛ _K ), JHEP 1102 (2011) 075, [arXiv:1012.2026].Google Scholar

[273] Buras, A. J. and Gérard, J. M., Isospin breaking contributions to ε ′ /ε , Phys. Lett. B192 (1987) 156.Google Scholar

[274] Blum, T., Boyle, P., Christ, N., Garron, N., Goode, E., et al., Lattice determination of the K → (ππ) _I=2 decay amplitude A ₂ , Phys. Rev. D86 (2012) 074513, [arXiv:1206.5142].Google Scholar

[275] Blum, T. et al., K → ππ ΔI = 3/2 decay amplitude in the continuum limit, Phys. Rev. D91 (2015), no. 7 074502, [arXiv:1502.00263].Google Scholar

[276] RBC, UKQCD Collaboration, Z. Bai et al., Standard model prediction for direct CP violation in K decay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015), no. 21 212001, [arXiv:1505.07863].Google Scholar

[277] Bijnens, J. and Prades, J., ε ′ /ε in the chiral limit, JHEP 06 (2000) 035, [hep-ph/0005189].Google Scholar

[278] Bijnens, J., Gamiz, E., and Prades, J., Matching the electroweak penguins Q ₇, Q ₈ and spectral correlators, JHEP 10 (2001) 009, [hep-ph/0108240].Google Scholar

[279] Cirigliano, V., F, J.. Donoghue, E. Golowich, and K. Maltman, Determination of 〈(ππ)I = 2|Q _7,8 |K ⁰ 〉 in the chiral limit, Phys. Lett. B522 (2001) 245–256, [hep-ph/0109113].Google Scholar

[280] Antonelli, V., Bertolini, S., M. Fabbrichesi, and E. I. Lashin, The ΔI = 1/2 selection rule, Nucl. Phys. B469 (1996) 181–201, [hep-ph/9511341].Google Scholar

[281] Bertolini, S., O, J.. Eeg, and M. Fabbrichesi, A new estimate of ε ′ /ε , Nucl. Phys. B476 (1996) 225–254, [hep-ph/9512356].Google Scholar

[282] Pallante, E. and Pich, A., Strong enhancement of ε ′ /ε through final state interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 (2000) 2568–2571, [hep-ph/9911233].Google Scholar

[283] Pallante, E. and Pich, A., Final state interactions in kaon decays, Nucl. Phys. B592 (2001) 294–320, [hep-ph/0007208].Google Scholar

[284] Buchler, M., Colangelo, G., J. Kambor, and F. Orellana, A note on the dispersive treatment of K → ππ with the kaon off-shell, Phys. Lett. B521 (2001) 29–32, [hep-ph/0102289].Google Scholar

[285] Buchler, M., Colangelo, G., J. Kambor, and F. Orellana, Dispersion relations and soft pion theorems for K → ππ , Phys. Lett. B521 (2001) 22–28, [hep-ph/0102287].Google Scholar

[286] Pallante, E., Pich, A., and Scimemi, I., The standard model prediction for ε ′ /ε , Nucl. Phys. B617 (2001) 441–474, [hep-ph/0105011].Google Scholar

[287] Aoki, S. et al., FLAG review 2019, arXiv:1902.08191.Google Scholar

[288] Aoki, Y., Arthur, R., Blum, T., Boyle, P., Brommel, D., et al., Continuum limit of B _K from 2+1 flavor domain wall QCD, Phys. Rev. D84 (2011) 014503, [arXiv:1012.4178].Google Scholar

[289] Bae, T., Jang, Y.-C., Jung, C., Kim, H.-J., Kim, J., et al., B _K using HYP-smeared staggered fermions in N _f = 2 + 1 unquenched QCD, Phys. Rev. D82 (2010) 114509, [arXiv:1008.5179].Google Scholar

[290] ETM Collaboration, M. Constantinou, et al., B _K -parameter from N _f = 2 twisted mass lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D83 (2011) 014505, [arXiv:1009.5606].Google Scholar

[291] Colangelo, G., Durr, S., Juttner, A., Lellouch, L., Leutwyler, H., et al., Review of lattice results concerning low energy particle physics, Eur. Phys. J. C71 (2011) 1695, [arXiv:1011.4408].Google Scholar

[292] Bailey, J. A., Bae, T., Jang, Y.-C., Jeong, H., Jung, C., et al., Beyond the standard model corrections to K ⁰ − K̅ ⁰ mixing, PoS LATTICE2012 (2012) 107, [arXiv:1211.1101].Google Scholar

[293] Durr, S., Fodor, Z., Hoelbling, C., Katz, S., Krieg, S., et al., Precision computation of the kaon bag parameter, Phys. Lett. B705 (2011) 477–481, [arXiv:1106.3230].Google Scholar

[294] SWME Collaboration, Bae, T., et al., Improved determination of ̂B _K with staggered quarks, Phys. Rev. D89 (2014), no. 7 074504, [arXiv:1402.0048].Google Scholar

[295] ETM Collaboration, Carrasco, N., Dimopoulos, P., Frezzotti, R., Lubicz, V., G. Rossi, C., Simula, S., and Tarantino, C., ΔS = 2 and ΔC = 2 bag parameters in the standard model and beyond from N _f =2+1+1 twisted-mass lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D92 (2015), no. 3 034516, [arXiv:1505.06639].Google Scholar

[296] Buras, A. J., Gorbahn, M., Jäger, S., and Jamin, M., Improved anatomy of ε ′ /ε in the standard model, JHEP 11 (2015) 202, [arXiv:1507.06345].Google Scholar

[297] Bai, Z., H, N.. Christ, Feng, X., Lawson, A., Portelli, A., and Sachrajda, C. T., Exploratory lattice QCD study of the rare kaon decay K ⁺ → π ⁺ v v̅ , Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (2017), no. 25 252001, [arXiv:1701.02858].Google Scholar

[298] RBC, UKQCD Collaboration, N. Christ, H., Feng, X., Portelli, A., and Sachrajda, C. T., Prospects for a lattice computation of rare kaon decay amplitudes: K → πℓ ⁺ ℓ ⁻ decays, Phys. Rev. D92 (2015), no. 9 094512, [arXiv:1507.03094].Google Scholar

[299] N. Christ, H., Feng, X., Juttner, A., Lawson, A., Portelli, A., and Sachrajda, C. T., First exploratory calculation of the long-distance contributions to the rare kaon decays K → πℓ ⁺ ℓ ⁻ , Phys. Rev. D94 (2016), no. 11 114516, [arXiv:1608.07585].Google Scholar

[300] RBC, UKQCD Collaboration, N. Christ, H., Izubuchi, T., C. Sachrajda, T., Soni, A., and Yu, J., Long distance contribution to the K _L − K _S mass difference, Phys. Rev. D88 (2013) 014508, [arXiv:1212.5931].Google Scholar

[301] Bai, Z., Christ, N. H., Izubuchi, T., Sachrajda, C. T., Soni, A., and Yu, J., K _L − K _S Mass difference from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 (2014) 112003, [arXiv:1406.0916].Google Scholar

[302] Carrasco, N., Lubicz, V., Martinelli, G., T, C.. Sachrajda, Tantalo, N., Tarantino, C., and Testa, M., QED Corrections to hadronic processes in lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D91 (2015), no. 7 074506, [arXiv:1502.00257].Google Scholar

[303] Lubicz, V., Martinelli, G., C. Sachrajda, T., Sanfilippo, F., Simula, S., and Tantalo, N., Finite-volume QED corrections to decay amplitudes in lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D95 (2017), no. 3 034504, [arXiv:1611.08497].Google Scholar

[304] Giusti, D., Lubicz, V., Martinelli, G., T, C.. Sachrajda, Sanfilippo, F., Simula, S., Tantalo, N., and Tarantino, C., First lattice calculation of the QED corrections to leptonic decay rates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (2018), no. 7 072001, [arXiv:1711.06537].Google Scholar

[305] Cerri, A., V, V.. Gligorov, Malvezzi, S., Martin, J. Camalich, and J. Zupan, Opportunities in flavour physics at the HL-LHC and HE-LHC, arXiv:1812.07638.Google Scholar

[306] Lehner, C. et al., Opportunities for lattice QCD in quark and lepton flavor physics, arXiv:1904.09479.Google Scholar

[307] Cirigliano, V., Davoudi, Z., Bhattacharya, T., Izubuchi, T., P. Shanahan, E., Syritsyn, S., and Wagman, M. L., The role of lattice QCD in searches for violations of fundamental symmetries and signals for new physics, arXiv:1904.09704.Google Scholar

[308] Jo, B., Jung, C., N. Christ, H., Detmold, W., Edwards, R., Savage, M., and Shanahan, P., Status and future perspectives for lattice gauge theory calculations to the exascale and beyond, arXiv:1904.09725.Google Scholar

[309] Beneke, M., Buchalla, G., Neubert, M., and Sachrajda, C. T., QCD factorization for B → Kπ, ππ Decays: Strong phases and CP violation in the heavy quark limit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 (1999) 1914–1917, [hep-ph/9905312].Google Scholar

[310] Beneke, M., Buchalla, G., Neubert, M., and Sachrajda, C. T., QCD factorization for exclusive, nonleptonic B meson decays: General arguments and the case of heavy light final states, Nucl. Phys. B591 (2000) 313–418, [hep-ph/0006124].Google Scholar

[311] Fakirov, D. and Stech, B., F and D decays , Nucl. Phys. B133 (1978) 315–326.Google Scholar

[312] Bjorken, J. D., Topics in B physics, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 11 (1989) 325–341.Google Scholar

[313] Politzer, H. D. and Wise, M. B., Perturbative corrections to factorization in B̅ decay, Phys. Lett. B257 (1991) 399–402.Google Scholar

[314] Bauer, C. W., Fleming, S., Pirjol, D., and Stewart, I. W., An effective field theory for collinear and soft gluons: Heavy to light decays, Phys. Rev. D63 (2001) 114020, [hep-ph/0011336].Google Scholar

[315] Bauer, C. W., Pirjol, D., and Stewart, I. W., Soft collinear factorization in effective field theory, Phys. Rev. D65 (2002) 054022, [hep-ph/0109045].Google Scholar

[316] Bauer, C. W., Pirjol, D., and Stewart, I. W., A proof of factorization for B → Dπ , Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (2001) 201806, [hep-ph/0107002].Google Scholar

[317] Beneke, M., Soft-collinear factorization in B decays, Nucl. Part. Phys. Proc. 261–262 (2015) 311–337, [arXiv:1501.07374].Google Scholar

[318] Fleischer, R., Flavour physics and CP violation: Expecting the LHC, in High-Energy Physics. Proceedings, 4th Latin American CERN-CLAF School, Vina del Mar, Chile, February 18–March 3, 2007, pp. 105–157, 2008. arXiv:0802.2882.Google Scholar

[319] Bartsch, M., Buchalla, G., and Kraus, C., B → V _L V _L decays at next-to-leading order in QCD, arXiv:0810.0249.Google Scholar

[320] Bell, G., Beneke, M., Huber, T., and Li, X.-Q., Two-loop current–current operator contribution to the nonleptonic QCD penguin amplitude, Phys. Lett. B750 (2015) 348–355, [arXiv:1507.03700].Google Scholar

[321] Alte, S., König, M., and Neubert, M., Effective field theory after a new-physics discovery, JHEP 08 (2018) 095, [arXiv:1806.01278].Google Scholar

[322] Alte, S., K, M.önig, and M. Neubert, Effective theory for a heavy scalar coupled to the SM via vector-like quarks, Eur. Phys. J. C79 (2019), no. 4 352, [arXiv:1902.04593].Google Scholar

[323] Keum, Y. Y., Li, H.-N., and Sanda, A. I., Penguin enhancement and B → Kπ decays in perturbative QCD, Phys. Rev. D63 (2001) 054008, [hep-ph/0004173].Google Scholar

[324] Lu, C.-D., Ukai, K., and Yang, M.-Z., Branching ratio and CP violation of B —> pi pi decays in perturbative QCD approach, Phys. Rev. D63 (2001) 074009, [hep-ph/0004213].Google Scholar

[325] Li, H.-n., QCD aspects of exclusive B meson decays, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 51 (2003) 85–171, [hep-ph/0303116].Google Scholar

[326] Yan, D.-C., Liu, X., and Xiao, Z.-J., Anatomy of B _s → PP decays and effects of the next-to-leading contributions in the perturbative QCD approach, arXiv:1906.01442.Google Scholar

[327] Isgur, N. and Wise, M. B., Weak decays of heavy mesons in the static quark approximation, Phys. Lett. B232 (1989) 113–117.Google Scholar

[328] Isgur, N. and Wise, M. B., Weak transition form-factors between heavy mesons, Phys. Lett. B237 (1990) 527–530.Google Scholar

[329] Grinstein, B., The static quark effective theory, Nucl. Phys. B339 (1990) 253–268.Google Scholar

[330] Falk, A. F., Georgi, H., Grinstein, B., and Wise, M. B., Heavy meson form-factors from QCD, Nucl. Phys. B343 (1990) 1–13.Google Scholar

[331] Georgi, H., An effective field theory for heavy quarks at low-energies, Phys. Lett. B240 (1990) 447–450.Google Scholar

[332] Isgur, N. and Wise, M. B., Heavy quark symmetry, Adv. Ser. Direct. High Energy Phys. 10 (1992) 234–285.Google Scholar

[333] Mannel, T., Roberts, W., and Ryzak, Z., A derivation of the heavy quark effective Lagrangian from QCD, Nucl. Phys. B368 (1992) 204–217.Google Scholar

[334] Neubert, M., Heavy quark symmetry, Phys. Rept. 245 (1994) 259–396, [hep-ph/9306320].Google Scholar

[335] Manohar, A. V. and Wise, M. B., Heavy quark physics, Camb. Monogr. Part. Phys. Nucl. Phys. Cosmol. 10 (2000) 1–191.Google Scholar

[336] Khoze, V. A. and Shifman, M. A., Heavy quarks, Sov. Phys. Usp. 26 (1983) 387.Google Scholar

[337] Shifman, M. A. and B, M.. Voloshin, Preasymptotic effects in inclusive weak decays of charmed particles, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 41 (1985) 120. [Yad. Fiz.41,187(1985)].Google Scholar

[338] Bigi, I. I. Y. and Uraltsev, N. G., Gluonic enhancements in non-spectator beauty decays: An inclusive mirage though an exclusive possibility, Phys. Lett. B280 (1992) 271–280.Google Scholar

[339] Blok, B. and A, M.. Shifman, The rule of discarding 1/N in inclusive weak decays. 1., Nucl. Phys. B399 (1993) 441–458, [hep-ph/9207236].Google Scholar

[340] Bigi, I. I. Y., G, N.. Uraltsev, and A. I. Vainshtein, Nonperturbative corrections to inclusive beauty and charm decays: QCD versus phenomenological models, Phys. Lett. B293 (1992) 430–436, [hep-ph/9207214]. [Erratum: Phys. Lett.B297,477(1992)].Google Scholar

[341] Blok, B. and A, M.. Shifman, The rule of discarding 1/N in inclusive weak decays. 2., Nucl. Phys. B399 (1993) 459–476, [hep-ph/9209289].Google Scholar

[342] Bigi, I. I. Y., Blok, B., Shifman, M. A., and Vainshtein, A. I., The baffling semileptonic branching ratio of B mesons, Phys. Lett. B323 (1994) 408–416, [hep-ph/9311339].Google Scholar

[343] Bigi, I. I. Y., Khoze, V. A., Uraltsev, N. G., and Sanda, A. I., The question of CP noninvariance – as seen through the eyes of neutral beauty, Adv. Ser. Direct. High Energy Phys. 3 (1989) 175–248.Google Scholar

[344] Bigi, I. I. Y., A. Shifman, M., and Uraltsev, N., Aspects of heavy quark theory, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 47 (1997) 591–661, [hep-ph/9703290].Google Scholar

[345] Lenz, A., Lifetimes and heavy quark expansion, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A30 (2015), no. 10 1543005, [arXiv:1405.3601]. [,63(2014)].Google Scholar

[346] Artuso, M., Borissov, G., and Lenz, A., CP violation in the B ⁰ _s system, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88 (2016), no. 4 045002, [arXiv:1511.09466].Google Scholar

[347] Ellis, J. R., Gaillard, M. K., Nanopoulos, D. V., and Rudaz, S., The phenomenology of the next left-handed quarks, Nucl. Phys. B131 (1977) 285. [Erratum: Nucl. Phys.B132,541(1978)].Google Scholar

[348] Hagelin, J. S., Mass mixing and CP violation in the B ⁰ − B̅ ⁰ system, Nucl. Phys. B193 (1981) 123–149.Google Scholar

[349] Franco, E., Lusignoli, M., and Pugliese, A., Strong interaction corrections to CP violation in B ⁰ − B̅ ⁰ mixing, Nucl. Phys. B194 (1982) 403.Google Scholar

[350] Chau, L.-L., Quark mixing in weak interactions, Phys. Rept. 95 (1983) 1–94.Google Scholar

[351] Buras, A. J., Slominski, W., and Steger, H., B ⁰ − B̅ ⁰ mixing, CP violation and the B meson decay, Nucl. Phys. B245 (1984) 369–398.Google Scholar

[352] Khoze, V. A., Shifman, M. A., Uraltsev, N. G., and Voloshin, M. B., On inclusive hadronic widths of beautiful particles, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 46 (1987) 112. [Yad. Fiz.46,181(1987)].Google Scholar

[353] Beneke, M., Buchalla, G., Greub, C., Lenz, A., and Nierste, U., Next-to-leading order QCD corrections to the lifetime difference of B _d,s mesons, Phys. Lett. B459 (1999) 631–640, [hep-ph/9808385].Google Scholar

[354] Beneke, M., Buchalla, G., and Dunietz, I., Width difference in the B _s − B̅ _s system, Phys. Rev. D54 (1996) 4419–4431, [hep-ph/9605259]. [Erratum: Phys. Rev.D83,119902(2011)].Google Scholar

[355] Chay, J., Georgi, H., and Grinstein, B., Lepton energy distributions in heavy meson decays from QCD, Phys. Lett. B247 (1990) 399–405.Google Scholar

[356] Bjorken, J. D., Dunietz, I., and Taron, J., Inclusive semileptonic decays of bottom baryons and mesons into charmed and uncharmed final states: The case of infinitely heavy b and c quarks, Nucl. Phys. B371 (1992) 111–140.Google Scholar

[357] Bigi, I. I. Y., Shifman, M. A., Uraltsev, N. G., and Vainshtein, A. I., QCD predictions for lepton spectra in inclusive heavy flavor decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 (1993) 496–499, [hep-ph/9304225]. [,201(1993)].Google Scholar

[358] Manohar, A. V. and B, M.. Wise, Inclusive semileptonic B and polarized lambda(b) decays from QCD, Phys. Rev. D49 (1994) 1310–1329, [hep-ph/9308246].Google Scholar

[359] Blok, B., Koyrakh, L., Shifman, M. A., and Vainshtein, A. I., Differential distributions in semileptonic decays of the heavy flavors in QCD, Phys. Rev. D49 (1994) 3356, [hep-ph/9307247]. [Erratum: Phys. Rev.D50,3572(1994)].Google Scholar

[360] Falk, A. F., Luke, M. E., and Savage, M. J., Nonperturbative contributions to the inclusive rare decays B → X _s γ and B → X _s l ⁺ l ⁻ , Phys. Rev. D49 (1994) 3367–3378, [hep-ph/9308288].Google Scholar

[361] Mannel, T., Operator product expansion for inclusive semileptonic decays in heavy quark effective field theory, Nucl. Phys. B413 (1994) 396–412, [hep-ph/9308262].Google Scholar

[362] Gasser, J. and Leutwyler, H., Chiral perturbation theory: Expansions in the mass of the strange quark, Nucl. Phys. B250 (1985) 465–516.Google Scholar

[363] Ecker, G., Gasser, J., Pich, A., and E. de Rafael, The role of resonances in chiral perturbation theory, Nucl. Phys. B321 (1989) 311–342.Google Scholar

[364] Ecker, G., Chiral perturbation theory, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 35 (1995) 1–80, [hep-ph/9501357].Google Scholar

[365] Pich, A., Chiral perturbation theory, Rept. Prog. Phys. 58 (1995) 563–610, [hep-ph/9502366].Google Scholar

[366] Colangelo, P. and Khodjamirian, A., QCD sum rules, a modern perspective, hep-ph/0010175.Google Scholar

[367] Ali, A., Braun, V. M., and Simma, H., Exclusive radiative B decays in the light cone QCD sum rule approach, Z. Phys. C63 (1994) 437–454, [hep-ph/9401277].Google Scholar

[368] Ball, P. and Zwicky, R., New results on B → π, K, η decay formfactors from light-cone sum rules, Phys. Rev. D71 (2005) 014015, [hep-ph/0406232].Google Scholar

[369] Khodjamirian, A., Mannel, T., and Offen, N., Form-factors from light-cone sum rules with B-meson distribution amplitudes, Phys. Rev. D75 (2007) 054013, [hep-ph/0611193].Google Scholar

[370] Weisskopf, V. and Wigner, E. P., Calculation of the natural brightness of spectral lines on the basis of Dirac’s theory, Z. Phys. 63 (1930) 54–73.Google Scholar

[371] Weisskopf, V. and Wigner, E., Over the natural line width in the radiation of the harmonius oscillator, Z. Phys. 65 (1930) 18–29.Google Scholar

[372] N. Christ, H., Feng, X., Martinelli, G., and Sachrajda, C. T., Effects of finite volume on the K _L -K _S mass difference, Phys. Rev. D91 (2015), no. 11 114510, [arXiv:1504.01170].Google Scholar

[373] Bai, Z., Christ, N. H., and Sachrajda, C. T., The K _L − K _S mass difference, EPJ Web Conf. 175 (2018) 13017.Google Scholar

[374] Particle Data Group Collaboration, Patrignani , C.et al., Review of particle physics, Chin. Phys. C40 (2016 and 2017 update), no. 10 100001.Google Scholar

[375] Gasser, J. and Meissner, U. G., On the phase of ε ′, Phys. Lett. B258 (1991) 219–224.Google Scholar

[376] Buras, A. J. and Guadagnoli, D., Correlations among new CP violating effects in ΔF = 2 observables, Phys. Rev. D78 (2008) 033005, [arXiv:0805.3887].Google Scholar

[377] Buras, A. J., Guadagnoli, D., and Isidori, G., On ɛ _K beyond lowest order in the operator product expansion, Phys. Lett. B688 (2010) 309–313, [arXiv:1002.3612].Google Scholar

[378] Buras, A. J. and Fleischer, R., Quark mixing, CP violation and rare decays after the top quark discovery, Adv. Ser. Direct. High Energy Phys. 15 (1998) 65–238, [hep-ph/9704376].Google Scholar

[379] Ball, P. et al., B decays at the LHC, in 1999 CERN Workshop on Standard Model Physics (and More) at the LHC, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, 25–26 May: Proceedings, 2000. hep-ph/0003238.Google Scholar

[380] Anikeev, K. et al., B physics at the Tevatron: Run II and beyond, in Workshop on B Physics at the Tevatron: Run II and Beyond, Batavia, Illinois, September 23–25, 1999, 2001. hep-ph/0201071.Google Scholar

[381] Fleischer, R., CP violation in the B system and relations to K → πν v̅ decays, Phys. Rept. 370 (2002) 537–680, [hep-ph/0207108].Google Scholar

[382] Nierste, U., Three lectures on meson mixing and CKM phenomenology, in Heavy Quark Physics. Proceedings, Helmholtz International School, HQP08, Dubna, Russia, August 11–21, 2008, pp. 1–38, 2009. arXiv:0904.1869.Google Scholar

[383] LHCb Collaboration, Aaij, R. et al., Implications of LHCb measurements and future prospects, EPJ C 73 (2013) 2373, [arXiv:1208.3355].Google Scholar

[384] Borissov, G., Fleischer, R., and Schune, M.-H., Rare decays and CP violation in the B _s system, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 63 (2013) 205–235, [arXiv:1303.5575].Google Scholar

[385] Esen, S. and Lenz, A., CKM 2018 summary of Working Group 4: Mixing and mixing-related CP violation in the B system ΔM, ΔΓ, ϕ _s , ϕ ₁ /β, ϕ ₂ /α, ϕ ₃ /γ, 2019. arXiv:1901.05000.Google Scholar

[386] Dunietz, I., Fleischer, R., and Nierste, U., In pursuit of new physics with B _s decays, Phys. Rev. D63 (2001) 114015, [hep-ph/0012219].Google Scholar

[387] Jubb, T., Kirk, M., Lenz, A., and Tetlalmatzi-Xolocotzi, G., On the ultimate precision of meson mixing observables, Nucl. Phys. B915 (2017) 431–453, [arXiv:1603.07770].Google Scholar