Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- List of tables
- List of contributors
- Introduction
- PART 1 Setting the stage
- PART 2 Explanation of cross-cultural differences
- PART 3 Methods for studying culture
- PART 4 The role of development
- 11 Cross-cultural research in the cultural-historical activity theory tradition
- 12 Self, family and culture: what is common, what changes?
- 13 Biology, culture and development: conceptual and methodological considerations
- 14 Differences and universals in families across cultures
- 15 An epigenetic view on culture: what evolutionary developmental psychology has to offer for cross-cultural psychology
- PART 5 Concepts of culture
- PART 6 Conclusion
- Index
- References
11 - Cross-cultural research in the cultural-historical activity theory tradition
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- List of tables
- List of contributors
- Introduction
- PART 1 Setting the stage
- PART 2 Explanation of cross-cultural differences
- PART 3 Methods for studying culture
- PART 4 The role of development
- 11 Cross-cultural research in the cultural-historical activity theory tradition
- 12 Self, family and culture: what is common, what changes?
- 13 Biology, culture and development: conceptual and methodological considerations
- 14 Differences and universals in families across cultures
- 15 An epigenetic view on culture: what evolutionary developmental psychology has to offer for cross-cultural psychology
- PART 5 Concepts of culture
- PART 6 Conclusion
- Index
- References
Summary
Introduction and purpose
The purpose of this chapter is to create a dialogue between Russian and American research on the role of culture in the constitution of human psychological functioning. Collectively we share the ‘cultural-historical activity’ tradition, which takes its inspiration and initial empirical work from the studies carried out by L. S. Vygotsky and his colleagues in the then-Soviet Union in the 1920s and 1930s. Common to this line of theorising is a belief in the central role of culture in the constitution of specifically human nature. However, issues of both theoretical and methodological origin (which are, of course, not distinct from each other) have led to several decades of discussion among Russian and non-Russian advocates of the cultural-historical approach concerning the interpretation of comparative, cross-cultural studies. It is our hope to make clear the importance of these differences to the broad community of cross-cultural psychologists in finding the ways to move forward the common programme of understanding the role of culture in human psychological processes and the specific role of cross-cultural research in that enterprise.
Cross-cultural experimental research: common dilemmas
As was true among Russian intellectuals, a pervasive belief in sociocultural evolution pervaded early Anglo-American psychology based upon the writings of nineteenth-century social philosophers such as the Englishmen Herbert Spencer and Edward Tylor, the putative ‘father of anthropology’ (for summaries see Cole, 1996, and Jahoda, 1992, this volume).
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Fundamental Questions in Cross-Cultural Psychology , pp. 261 - 287Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2011
References
(1982). The emergence of gestalt theory: Experimental psychology in Germany 1890–1920. Harvard University Ph.D., University Microfilms International.Google Scholar
(1985). The zone of proximal development: Where culture and cognition create each other. In (ed.), Culture, communication, and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives (pp. 146–61). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1996). Cultural Psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
, and (1981). Comparative studies of how people think: An introduction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
, , , and (1971). The cultural context of learning and thinking. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
, , and (2006). The autobiography of Alexander Luria: A dialog with the making of mind. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
(1989). Culturally based reasoning. In , and (eds.), Cognition and social worlds (pp. 132–43). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1995). Functional asymmetry of a brain and heterogeneity of thinking or how the syllogisms with a false premise are solved in a condition of temporary oppression of one lobe. In (ed.), Neuropsychology today (pp. 28–37). Moscow: Moscow State University.*Google Scholar
(1963). Experience and education. New York: Macmillan. (Original work published 1938.)Google Scholar
, and (1990). The influence of the imagination on reasoning by young children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 8, 305–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (2005). Reasoning from unfamiliar premises: A study with unschooled adults. Psychological Science, 16, 550–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(1978). Wilhelm Dilthey: The critique of historical reason. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
, and (1967). The new mathematics and an old culture. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
(1972). Oral and written language: The consequence for cognitive development in Africa, the U.S., and England. Language and Speech, 15, 169–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1992). Crossroads between culture and mind: Continuities and change in theories of human nature. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
(1926). Archaeological observations north of the Rio Colorado. Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin 82, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
(2002). Psychological means of managing of thinking in a structure of a scientific concept. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis.*
(1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
(2007). Biocultural co-construction of developmental plasticity across the lifespan. In and (eds.), Handbook of cultural psychology (pp. 528–44). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
(1928). The problem of the cultural behavior of the child. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 35, 493–506.Google Scholar
(1971). Psychology as a historical science. In History and psychology (pp. 36–62). Moscow: Pedagogika.*Google Scholar
(2000). Logical-semantic analysis of L. S. Vygotsky's concept. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis.
(2000). Vygotsky's conception: A logico-semantic analysis. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 38, 34–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2007). Terminology in L. S. Vygotsky's writings. In , and (eds.), The Cambridge companion to Vygotsky (pp. 155–77). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2007). The discursive questions of cross-cultural researches of the literacy influence on the cognitive development and the concept of sympractical society. Cultural-historical psychology, 4, 59–67.*Google Scholar
, and (2003). Theoretical and methodological problems in cross-cultural psychology. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 33, 67–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1930). The experience of pedology-pedagogical expeditions on the study of people of distant districts. Pedology, 2, 167–71.*Google Scholar
(1975). Recall of classical syllogisms: A cross-cultural investigation of error on logical problems. In (ed.), Reasoning: Representation and process in children and adults (pp. 153–73). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
(1977). Modes of thinking and ways of speaking: Culture and logic reconsidered. In and (eds.), Thinking: Readings in cognitive science (pp. 483–500). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
, and (1981). The psychology of literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , and (1999). Human behavior in global perspective: An introduction to cross-cultural psychology. Boston: MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
, , and (1979). Education and cognitive development: The evidence from experimental research. Monographs of the Society for Research in Children Development, 44, 1–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1935). Development of scientific notions of a schoolchild. Moscow and Leningrad: Uchebno-Pedagochiskoe.*Google Scholar
, and (1980). Theoretic syllogistic reasoning: Regressing when not used?Acta et Comentationes Universitatis Tartuensis, Tartu, 50–9.Google Scholar
(1979). On the origin of theoretic syllogistic reasoning in culture and the child. Newsletter of the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition, 1, 73–80.Google Scholar
(1988). Cultural-historical development of verbal thinking (psychological research). Tallin: Valgus.Google Scholar
. (1985). About the determination of reflection in verbal thinking. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis.*
(1929). To the question of the scientific exploration plan for the pedology of national minorities. Pedology, 3, 367–78.*Google Scholar
(1931). The history of the development of higher psychological functions. Moscow and Leningrad: Uchebrio-Pedagogicheskoe Izdatel'stvo.Google Scholar
(1966). Play and its role in psychic development of a child. Questions of Psychology, 6, 62–76.*Google Scholar
, and (1930). Studies in the history of behavior: Monkey, primitive, child. Moscow and Leningrad: Governman Publishers.*Google Scholar
, , and (1934). To the question of dementia in Pick's disease. Clinical and Experimental-Psychological Research: Soviet Neuropathology, Psychiatry, and Psychohygiene, 3, 97–136.*Google Scholar
(1968). Reasoning about a rule. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20, 273–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
, and (1982). Cognitive styles: Essence and origins: Field dependence and field independence. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
(1930). Mental development and psychic particularities of Oyrot children. Pedology, 2, 222–35.*Google Scholar
, , and (1964/1971). Development of thinking. In and (eds.), The psychology of preschool children(pp. 186–254). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- 4
- Cited by