Accattino, P. (2005) Alessandro di Afrodisia. De anima II (Mantissa). Alessandria.Google Scholar

Ackrill, J. L. (1963) Aristotle’s Categories and De Interpretatione. Translated with notes. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alesse, F. (ed.) (2008) Philo of Alexandria and Post-Aristotelian Philosophy. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Algra, K. (1990) ‘Chrysippus on virtuous abstention from ugly old women (Plutarch, SR 1038E-1039A)’, Classical Quarterly 84: 450–8.Google Scholar

Algra, K. (2003) ‘Epictetus and Stoic theology’, in Inwood, (2003): 153–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Algra, K., Barnes, J., Mansfeld, J. and Schofield, M. (eds.) (1999) The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, G. (1994) Sage, Saint and Sophist. Holy Men and Their Associates in the Early Roman Empire. London.Google Scholar

Annas, J. (1990) ‘The Hellenistic version of Aristotle’s Ethics’, Monist 73: 80–96.Google Scholar

Annas, J. (1993) The Morality of Happiness. Oxford.Google Scholar

Annas, J. (1999) Platonic Ethics, Old and New. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar

Annas, J. (2007) ‘Carneades’ classification of ethical theories’, in Pyrrhonists, Patricians, Platonizers. Hellenistic Philosophy in the Period 155–86 BC, ed. Ioppolo, A. M. and Sedley, D. N.. Naples: 187–223.Google Scholar

Annas, J. (2013) ‘Plato’s Laws and Cicero’s de Legibus’, in Schofield, (2013): 206–24.Google Scholar

Annas, J. and Barnes, J. (1985) The Modes of Skepticism. Ancient Texts and Modern Interpretations. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Annas, J. and Betegh, G. (eds.) (2015) Cicero’s De Finibus. A New Appraisal. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Armstrong, J. M. (2004) ‘After the ascent: Plato on becoming like God’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 26: 171–83.Google Scholar

Arnim, H. (1903–24) Stoicorum veterum fragmenta, 4 vols. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Arnold, E. V. (1911) Roman Stoicism. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Atkins, J. W. (2013) Cicero on Politics and the Limits of Reason. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Attridge, H. W. (2002) ‘Genre bending in the Fourth Gospel’, Journal of Biblical Literature 127: 1–27.Google Scholar

Attridge, H. W. (2006) ‘The cubist principle in Johannine imagery. John and the reading of images in contemporary Platonism’, in Imagery in the Gospel of John. Terms, Forms, Themes and Theology of Figurative Language, ed. Frey, J., van der Watt, J. G. and Zimmermann, R. with the collaboration of Kern, G.. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 200. Tübingen: 47–60; repr. in Attridge, (2010a): 79–92.Google Scholar

Attridge, H. W. (2010a) Essays on John and Hebrews. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 264. Tübingen.Google Scholar

Attridge, H. W. (2010b) ‘An emotional Jesus and Stoic traditions’, in Rasimus, et al. (2010): 77–92; repr. in Attridge, (2010a): 122–36.Google Scholar

Attridge, H. W. (2013) ‘How priestly is the “high priestly” prayer of John 17?’, Catholic Biblical Quarterly 75: 1–14.Google Scholar

Attridge, H. W. (2014) ‘La christologie kénotique et l’Épître aux Hébreux’, Etudes théologiques et religieuses 89: 293–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Attridge, H. W. and MacRae, G. W., SJ (1985) ‘NHC I,3: the Gospel of Truth’, in Nag Hammadi Codex I (The Jung Codex) vol. I Introductions, Texts, Translations, Indices, ed. Attridge, H. W.. Nag Hammadi Studies 22. Leiden: 55–122.Google Scholar

Babut, D. (1969) Plutarque et le stoïcisme. Publications de l’Université de Lyon. Paris.Google Scholar

Babut, D. (1992) ‘La composition des Dialogues pythiques de Plutarque et le problème de leur unité’, Journal des Savants 20: 187–234; repr. in Babut, (1994a): 457–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Babut, D. (1993) ‘Stoïciens et Stoïcisme dans les Dialogues pythiques de Plutarque’, Illinois Classical Studies 18: 203–27.Google Scholar

Babut, D. (1994a) Parerga. Choix d’articles de Daniel Babut (1974–1994). Lyon.Google Scholar

Babut, D. (1994b) ‘Du scepticisme au dépassement de la raison. Philosophie et foi religieuse chez Plutarque’, in Babut, (1994a): 549–81.Google Scholar

Ball, D. M. (1996) ‘“I Am” in John’s Gospel. Literary Function, Background and Theological Implications’, Journal for the Study of the New Testament Supplement Series 124. Sheffield.Google Scholar

Baltzly, D. (2014) ‘Plato’s authority and the formation of textual communities’, Classical Quarterly 64: 793–807.Google Scholar

Bastianini, G. and Sedley, D. N. (1995) ‘Commentarium in Platonis Theaetetum’, in Corpus dei papiri filosofici greci e latini, parte III: Commentari. Florence: 227–562.Google Scholar

Beck, M. (ed.) (2014) A Companion to Plutarch. Chichester.Google Scholar

Bekken, P. J. (2014) The Lawsuit Motif in John’s Gospel from New Perspectives. Jesus Christ, Crucified Criminal and Emperor of the World. Novum Testamentum Supplements 158. Leiden and Boston.Google Scholar

Bénatouïl, Th. (2007) ‘Le débat entre platonisme et stoïcisme sur la vie scolastique. Chrysippe, la Nouvelle Académie et Antiochus’, in Bonazzi, and Helmig, (2007a): 1–21.Google Scholar

Bénatouïl, Th. (2009a) ‘ΘΕΩΡΙΑ et vie contemplative du stoïcisme au platonisme. Chrysippe, Panétius, Antiochus et Alcinoos’, in Bonazzi, and Opsomer, (2009): 3–31.Google Scholar

Bénatouïl, Th. (2009b) ‘How industrious can Zeus be? The extent and objects of divine activity in Stoicism’, in Salles, (2009): 23–45.Google Scholar

Bénatouïl, Th. (unpublished) La science des hommes libres. La digression du Théétète dans ses contextes. HDR thesis Paris, 2012.Google Scholar

Bénatouïl, Th. (2015) ‘Structure, standards and moral progress in De Finibus, 4’, in Annas, and Betegh, (2015): 198–220.Google Scholar

Bénatouïl, T. and Bonazzi, M.. (eds.) (2012) Theoria, Praxis and the Contemplative Life after Plato and Aristotle. Leiden.Google Scholar

Bergeron, M. and Dufour, R. (2008) Alexandre D’Aphrodise. De l’âme. Paris.Google Scholar

Billerbeck, M. (1978) Vom Kynismus. Leiden.Google Scholar

Birnbaum, E. (1995) ‘What does Philo mean by “seeing God”? Some methodological considerations’. Society of Biblical Literature Seminar Papers 34. Atlanta: 535–52.Google Scholar

Birnbaum, E. (1996) The Place of Judaism in Philo’s Thought. Israel, Jews, and Proselytes. Studia Philonica Monographs 2. Brown Judaic Studies 290. Atlanta.Google Scholar

Blumenthal, H. J. (1972) ‘Plotinus’ psychology. Aristotle in the service of Platonism’, International Philosophical Quarterly 12: 340–64.Google Scholar

Bonazzi, M. (2002) ‘Eudoro di Alessandria e il Timeo di Platone (a proposito di Simpl. In Phys. p. 181, 7–30 Diels)’, in Arrhetos Theos. L’Ineffabilità del Primo Principio nel Medio Platonismo, ed. Calabi, F.. Pisa: 11–34.Google Scholar

Bonazzi, M. (2003) Academici e Platonici. Il debattito antico sullo scetticismo di Platone. Milan.Google Scholar

Bonazzi, M. (2007a) ‘Eudorus’ psychology and Stoic ethics’, in Bonazzi, and Helmig, (2007a): 109–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bonazzi, M. (2007b) ‘Plutarco, l’academia e la politica’, in Plutarco e la cultura della sua età. Atti del X Convegno plutarcheo Fisciano – Paestum, 27–29 ottobre 2005, ed. Cacciatore, P. Volpe and Ferrari, F.. Naples: 265–80.Google Scholar

Bonazzi, M. (2009) ‘Antiochus’ ethics and the subordination of Stoicism’, in Bonazzi, and Opsomer, (2009): 33–54.Google Scholar

Bonazzi, M. (2012a) ‘Theoria and praxis. On Plutarch’s Platonism’, in Bénatouïl, and Bonazzi, (2012): 139–62.Google Scholar

Bonazzi, M. (2012b) ‘Antiochus and Platonism’, in Sedley, (2012): 307–33.Google Scholar

Bonazzi, M. (2013a) ‘Le commentateur anonyme du Théétète et l’invention du platonisme’, in La mesure du savoir. Études sur le Théétète de Platon, ed. El Murr, D.. Paris: 309–33.Google Scholar

Bonazzi, M. (2013b) ‘Pythagoreanising Aristotle. Eudorus and the systematisation of Platonism’, in Schofield, (2013): 160–86.Google Scholar

Bonazzi, M. (2014) ‘Middle Platonists on fate and human autonomy. A confrontation with the Stoics’, in On What Is Up to Us, ed. Destrée, P., Horn, C. and Salles, R.. Sankt Augustin: 283–94.Google Scholar

Bonazzi, M. (2015) À la recherche des Idées. Platonisme et philosophie hellénistique d’Antiochus à Plotin. Paris.Google Scholar

Bonazzi, M. and Celluprica, V. (eds.) (2005) L’eredità platonica. Studi sul platonismo da Arcesilao a Proclo. Naples.Google Scholar

Bonazzi, M. and Helmig, C. (eds.) (2007a) Platonic Stoicism – Stoic Platonism. The Dialogue between Platonism and Stoicism in Antiquity. Leuven.Google Scholar

Bonazzi, M. and Helmig, C. (2007b) ‘Introduction’, in Bonazzi, and Helmig, (2007a): vii–xv.Google Scholar

Bonazzi, M., Lévy, C. and Steel, C. (eds.) (2007) A Platonic Pythagoras. Platonism and Pythagoreanism in the Imperial Age. Turnhout.Google Scholar

Bonazzi, M. and Opsomer, J. (eds.) (2009) The Origins of the Platonic System. Platonisms of the Early Empire and Their Philosophical Contexts. Leuven.Google Scholar

Bonhöffer, A. (1890) Epiktet und die Stoa. Untersuchungen zur stoischen Philosophie. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Boot, P. (1984) Plotinus, Over Voorzienigheid (Enneade III 2–3 [47–48]). Inleiding – Commentaar – Essays. Diss. Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Borgen, P. (1965) Bread from Heaven. An Exegetical Study of the Concept of Manna in the Gospel of John and the Writings of Philo. Novum Testamentum Supplements 10. Leiden.Google Scholar

Borgen, P. (1983) Logos Was the True Light and Other Essays on the Gospel of John. Trondheim.Google Scholar

Bos, A. P. (1976) Providentia Divina. Assen.Google Scholar

Bowen, A. C. and Todd, R. B. (eds.) (2004) Cleomedes’ Lectures on Astronomy. Berkeley and Los Angeles.Google Scholar

Boys-Stones, G. (1997) ‘Thyrsus–bearer of the Academy or enthusiast for Plato?’, in Plutarch and His Intellectual World. Essays on Plutarch, ed. Mossman, J.. London and Swansea: 41–58.Google Scholar

Boys-Stones, G. (1998) ‘Plutarch on κοινὸς λόγος. Towards an architecture of De Stoicorum repugnantiis’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 16: 299–329.Google Scholar

Boys-Stones, G. (2001) Post-Hellenistic Philosophy. A study of Its Development from the Stoics to Origen. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boys-Stones, G. (2005) ‘Alcinoos, Didaskalikos 4. In defence of dogmatism’, in Bonazzi, and Celluprica, (2005): 201–34.Google Scholar

Boys-Stones, G. (2009) ‘Cornutus und sein philosophisches Umfeld. Der Antiplatonismus der Epidrome’, in A. Cornutus. Die griechischen Götter. Ein Überblick über Namen, Bilder und Deutungen, ed. Nesselrath, H.-G.. Tübingen: 141–61.Google Scholar

Boys-Stones, G. (2012) ‘Antiochus’ metaphysics’, in Sedley, (2012): 220–36.Google Scholar

Boys-Stones, G. (2013) ‘Seneca against Plato. Letters 58 and 65’, in Long, A. G. (2013): 128–46.Google Scholar

Boys-Stones, G. (2014) ‘Unity and the good. Platonists against Oikeiosis’, in Unité et origine des vertus dans la philosophie ancienne, ed. Collette-Dučić, B. and Delcomminette, S.. Brussels: 297–320.Google Scholar

Brakke, D. (2010) The Gnostics. Myth, Ritual, and Diversity in Early Christianity. Cambridge, MA and London.Google Scholar

Brittain, C. (2001) Philo of Larissa. The Last of the Academic Sceptics. Oxford.Google Scholar

Brittain, C. (2005) ‘Common sense. Concepts, definitions and meaning in and out of the Stoa’, in Language and Learning. Philosophy of Language in the Hellenistic Age, ed. Frede, D. and Inwood, B.. Cambridge: 164–209.Google Scholar

Brittain, C. (2006) Cicero on Academic Scepticism. Indianapolis and Cambridge.Google Scholar

Brittain, C. (2012) ‘Antiochus’ epistemology’, in Sedley, (2012a): 104–30.Google Scholar

Brittain, C. (2015) ‘Cicero’s sceptical methods. The example of the De Finibus’, in Annas, and Betegh, (2015): 12–40.Google Scholar

Broek, R. (2013) Gnostic Religion in Antiquity. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Bruns, I. (1897) Alexandri Aphrodisiensis. De anima libri cum Mantissa. Supplementum Aristotelicum II, 1. Berlin.Google Scholar

Brunschwig, J. (1986) ‘The cradle argument in Epicureanism and Stoicism’, in The Norms of Nature. Studies in Hellenistic Ethics, ed. Schofield, M. and Striker, G.. Cambridge: 114–44.Google Scholar

Brunschwig, J. (1995) Etudes sur les philosophies hellénistiques. Epicurisme, stoïcisme, scepticisme. Paris.Google Scholar

Brunschwig, J. (2003) ‘Stoic metaphysics’, in Inwood, (2003): 206–32.Google Scholar

Brunt, P. A. (1986) ‘Cicero’s officium in the Civil War’, Journal of Roman Studies 76: 12–32.Google Scholar

Buch-Hansen, G. (2010a) ‘The emotional Jesus. Anti-Stoicism in the Fourth Gospel?’, in Rasimus, et al. (2010): 93–114.Google Scholar

Buch-Hansen, G. (2010b) ‘It Is the Spirit That Gives Life.’ A Stoic Understanding of Pneuma in John’s Gospel. Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft 173. Berlin and New York.Google Scholar

Bückers, H. (1938) Die Unsterblichkeitslehre des Weisheitsbuches. Ihr Ursprung und ihre Bedeutung. Alttestamentliche Abhandlungen 13. Münster.Google Scholar

Burkert, W. (1985) Greek Religion. Archaic and Classical. Oxford.Google Scholar

Burns, D. M. (2014) Apocalypse of the Alien God. Platonism and the Exile of Sethian Gnosticism. Philadelphia.Google Scholar

Calabi, F. (2008) God’s Acting, Man’s Acting. Tradition and Philosophy in Philo of Alexandria. Studies in Philo of Alexandria 4. Leiden and Boston.Google Scholar

Carmichael, C. M. (1996) The Story of Creation. Its Origin and Interpretation in Philo and the Fourth Gospel. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar

Casevitz, M. and Babut, D. (eds.) (2002–4) Plutarque. Œuvres Morales, Tome XV, 1re partie, Traité 70, Sur les contradictions stoïciennes. Traité 71, Synopsis du traité ‘Que les Stoïciens tiennent des propos plus paradoxaux que les poètes’. 2e partie, Traité 72, Sur les notions communes, contre les Stoïciens. Texte établi par Casevitz, M., traduit et commenté par Babut, D.. Paris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Castagnoli, L. (2010) Ancient Self-Refutation. The Logic and History of the Self-Refutation Argument from Democritus to Augustine. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Castner, C. J. (1988) Prosopography of Roman Epicureans from the Second Century B.C. to the Second Century A.D. Frankfurt and New York.Google Scholar

Caston, V. (2012) Alexander of Aphrodisias. On the Soul, Part I. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar

Catana, L. (2013), ‘The origin of the division between Middle Platonism and Neoplatonism’, Apeiron 46: 166–200.Google Scholar

Cherniss, H. (ed.) (1976) Plutarch’s Moralia in Seventeen Volumes, XIII, Part II, 1033A-1086B. Cambridge, MA and London.Google Scholar

Chiaradonna, R. (2007) ‘Platonismo e teoria della conoscenza stoica tra II e III secolo d.C.’, in Bonazzi, and Helmig, (2007a): 209–41.Google Scholar

Chiaradonna, R. (2009a) ‘Plotino su pensiero, estensione e percezione sensibile: un dualismo “cartesiano”?’, in Il Platonismo e le scienze, ed. Chiaradonna, R.. Rome: 81–99.Google Scholar

Chiaradonna, R. (2009b) ‘Autour d’Eudore. Les débuts de l’exégèse des Catégories dans le Moyen Platonisme’, in Bonazzi, and Opsomer, (2009): 89–111.Google Scholar

Chiaradonna, R. (ed.) (2012) Filosofia tardoantica. Rome.Google Scholar

Chiaradonna, R. (2013) ‘Platonist approaches to Aristotle. From Antiochus of Ascalon to Eudorus of Alexandria (and beyond)’, in Schofield, (2013): 28–52.Google Scholar

Collins, J. J. (1997) Jewish Wisdom in the Hellenistic Age. Old Testament Library. Louisville.Google Scholar

Colpe, C. (1979) ‘Von der Logoslehre des Philo zu der des Clemens von Alexandrien’, in Kerygma und Logos. Beiträge zu den geistesgeschichtlichen Beziehungen zwischen Antike und Christentum. FS für Carl Andresen zum 70. Geburtstag, ed. Ritter, A. M.. Göttingen: 89–107; repr. in Colpe, C., Das Siegel der Propheten. Historische Beziehungen zwischen Judentum, Judenchristentum, Heidentum und frühem Islam. Berlin (1990): 141–64.Google Scholar

Cooper, J. M. (1999a) Reason and Emotion. Essays on Ancient Moral Psychology and Ethical Theory. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Cooper, J. M. (1999b) ‘Posidonius on emotions’, in Cooper, (1999a): 449–84.Google Scholar

Corcilius, K. (2011) ‘Aristotle’s definition of non-rational pleasure and pain and desire’, in Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics. A Critical Guide, ed. Miller, J.. Cambridge: 117–43.Google Scholar

Cordero, M. García (1993) ‘El “Logos” de Filón y el “Logos” del prólogo al Cuarto Evangelio’, Ciencia Tomista 120: 209–42, 433–61.Google Scholar

Couissin, P. (1929a) ‘L’origine et l’évolution de l’epochè’, Revue des études grecques 42: 373–97.Google Scholar

Couissin, P. (1929b) ‘Le stoïcisme de la Nouvelle Académie’, Revue d’histoire de la philosophie 3: 241–76.Google Scholar

Couissin, P. (1941) ‘Les sorites de Carnéade contre le polythéisme’, Revue des études grecques 54: 43–57.Google Scholar

Cox, R. (2007) By the Same Word. Creation and Salvation in Hellenistic Judaism and Early Christianity. Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft 145. Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dawson, D. (1992) Allegorical Readers and Cultural Revision in Ancient Alexandria. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Diels, H. (1879) Doxographi Graeci. Berlin.Google Scholar

Dillon, J. (1977, 2nd ed. 1996) The Middle Platonists 80 B.C. to A.D. 220. London.Google Scholar

Dillon, J. (1988) ‘“Orthodoxy” and “eclecticism”. Middle Platonists and Neo-Pythagoreans’, in Dillon, and Long, (1988): 103–25.Google Scholar

Dillon, J. (ed.) (1993) Alcinous. The Handbook of Platonism, tr. and comm. Oxford.Google Scholar

Dillon, J. (1998) ‘ASŌMATOS. Nuances of incorporeality in Philo’, in Philon d’Alexandrie et le langage de la philosophie, ed. Lévy, C.. Turnhout: 99–110.Google Scholar

Dillon, J. (2001) ‘The Neoplatonic reception of Plato’s Laws’, in Plato’s Laws and Its Historical Significance, ed. Lisi, F. L.. Sankt Augustin: 243–54.Google Scholar

Dillon, J. (2003) The Heirs of Plato. Oxford.Google Scholar

Dillon, J. (2008) ‘Philo and Hellenistic Platonism’, in Alesse, (2008): 223–32.Google Scholar

Dillon, J. (2011) ‘The ideas as thoughts of God’, Études platoniciennes 8: 31–42.Google Scholar

Dillon, J. and Long, A. A. (eds.) (1988) The Question of “Eclecticism”. Studies in Later Greek Philosophy. Berkeley and London.Google Scholar

Dingeldein, L. (2014) ‘Gaining virtue, gaining Christ. Moral development in the letters of Paul’. Diss. Brown University.Google Scholar

Dobbin, R. (1998) Epictetus, Discourses, Book 1. Clarendon Later Ancient Philosophers. Oxford.Google Scholar

Dodds, E. R. (1963) The Elements of Theology. 2nd ed. Oxford.Google Scholar

Donaldson, T. L. (2007) Judaism and Gentiles. Jewish Patterns of Universalism. Waco, TX.Google Scholar

Donini, P. L. (1988a) ‘The history of the concept of eclecticism’, in Dillon, and Long, (1988): 15–33.Google Scholar

Donini, P. L. (1988b) ‘La connaissance de dieu et la hiérarchie divine chez Albinos’, in Knowledge of God in the Graeco-Roman World, ed. van den Broek, R., Baarda, T. and Mansfeld, J.. Leiden: 118–31.Google Scholar

Donini, P. L. (1994) ‘Testi e commenti, manuali e insegnamento: la forma sistematica e i metodi della filosofia in età postellenistica’, in Aufstieg und Niedergang der rӧmischen Welt II.36.7, ed. Haase, W. and Temporini, H.. Berlin and New York: 5027–5100.Google Scholar

Donini, P. L. (2002) ‘L’eredità academica e i fondamenti del platonismo in Plutarco’, in Ἕνωσις καὶ φιλία: Unione e amicizia. Omaggio a Francesco Romano, ed. Barbanti, M., Giardina, G. R., Manganaro, P. et al. Catania: 247–73.Google Scholar

Donini, P. L. (2012) ‘Una nuova raccolta di studi su Antioco di Ascalona’, Méthexis 25: 151–63.Google Scholar

Dörrie, H. (1944) ‘Der Platoniker Eudoros von Alexandreia’, Hermes 79: 25–38.Google Scholar

Dörrie, H. and Baltes, M. (1987–2008) Der Platonismus in der Antike, 8 vols. Stuttgart and Bad Cannstatt.Google Scholar

Dörrie, H. and Baltes, M. (1996) Die philosophische Lehre des Platonismus. Einige grundlegende Axiome / Platonische Physik (im antiken Verständnis) I. Der Platonismus in der Antike, vol. 4. Stuttgart and Bad Cannstatt.Google Scholar

Dörrie, H. and Baltes, M. (2002) Der Platonismus in der Antike, vol. 6. Stuttgart and Bad Cannstatt.Google Scholar

Dorandi, T. (2010) ‘“Editori” antichi di Platone’, Antiquorum Philosophia 4: 161–74.Google Scholar

Downing, F. G. (1990) ‘Ontological asymmetry in Philo and Christological realism in Paul, Hebrews and John’, Journal of Theological Studies 41: 423–40.Google Scholar

Dragona-Monachou, M. (1975–6) ‘The problem of evil in Philo of Alexandria, with special reference to the De providentia [in Greek]’, Philosophia (Athens) 5–6: 306–52.Google Scholar

Dragona-Monachou, M. (1976) The Stoic Arguments for the Existence and Providence of the Gods. Athens.Google Scholar

Duff, P. (2008) ‘Transformed “from glory to glory”. Paul’s appeal to the experience of his readers in 2 Cor 3:18’, Journal of Biblical Literature 127: 762–80.Google Scholar

Dugan, J. (2013) ‘Cicero’s rhetorical theory’, in The Cambridge Companion to Cicero, ed. Steel, C.. Cambridge: 25–40.Google Scholar

Dunderberg, I. (2008) Beyond Gnosticism. Myth, Lifestyle, and Society in the School of Valentinus. New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dunn, J. D. G. (1996) Christology in the Making. A New Testament Inquiry into the Origins of the Doctrine of the Incarnation. 2nd ed. Grand Rapids, MI.Google Scholar

Dyck, A. R. (1996) A Commentary on Cicero, De Officiis. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

Dyck, A. R. (2004) A Commentary on Cicero’s De Legibus. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

Dyson, H. (2009) Prolepsis and Ennoia in the Early Stoa, Berlin.Google Scholar

Edelstein, L. and Kidd, I. G. (eds.) (1988–99) Posidonius, 3 vols. Cambridge Classical Texts and Commentaries 13, 14, 36. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Einarson, B. and De Lacy, Ph. (eds.) (1967) Plutarch’s Moralia in Fifteen Volumes, XIV, 1086C–1147A. Cambridge, MA and London.Google Scholar

Engberg-Pedersen, T. (1990) The Stoic Theory of Oikeiosis. Moral Development and Social Interaction in Early Stoic Philosophy. Aarhus.Google Scholar

Engberg-Pedersen, T. (2000) Paul and the Stoics. Edinburgh and Louisville, KY.Google Scholar

Engberg-Pedersen, T. (ed.) (2001) Paul Beyond the Judaism/Hellenism Divide. Louisville, KY.Google Scholar

Engberg-Pedersen, T. (2010a) Cosmology and Self in the Apostle Paul. The Material Spirit. Oxford.Google Scholar

Engberg-Pedersen, T. (2010b) ‘Setting the scene. Stoicism and Platonism in the transitional period in ancient philosophy’, in Rasimus, et al. (2010): 1–14.Google Scholar

Engberg-Pedersen, T. (2012) ‘Logos and pneuma in the Fourth Gospel’, in Greco-Roman Culture and the New Testament. Studies Commemorating the Centennial of the Pontifical Biblical Institute, ed. Aune, D. E. and Brenk, F. E.. Novum Testamentum Supplements 143. Leiden and Boston: 27–48.Google Scholar

Falcon, A. (2012) Aristotelianism in the First Century BCE. Xenarchus of Seleucia. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Ferrari, F. (1996) ‘Dio: padre e artefice. La teologia di Plutarco in Plat. Quaest. 2’, in Plutarco e la religione. Atti del VI Convegno plutarcheo (Ravello, 29–31 maggio 1995), ed. Gallo, I.. Naples: 395–409.Google Scholar

Ferrari, F. (2000) ‘Plutarch. Platonismus und Tradition’, in Philosophen des Altertums, ed. Erler, M. and Graeser, A.. Darmstadt: 109–27.Google Scholar

Ferrari, F. (2005) ‘Plutarco e lo scetticismo ellenistico’, in Plutarco e l’età ellenistica. Atti del Convegno Internazionale di Studi, Firenze, 23–24 Settembre 2004, ed. Casanova, A.. Florence: 369–84.Google Scholar

Ferrari, F. (2008) ‘I fondamenti metafisici dell’etica di Plutarco’, Ploutarchos, n.s. 5, 2007–8: 19–32.Google Scholar

Ferrary, J.-L. (1995) ‘The statesman and the law in the political philosophy of Cicero’, in Justice and Generosity, ed. Laks, A. and Schofield, M.. Cambridge: 48–73.Google Scholar

Fillion-Lahille, J. (1984) Le De Ira de Sénèque et la philosophie Stoïcienne des passions. Paris.Google Scholar

Fine, G. (2014) The Possibility of Inquiry. Meno’s Paradox from Socrates to Sextus, Oxford.Google Scholar

Fortenbaugh, W. W. (ed.) (1983) On Stoic and Peripatetic Ethics. The Work of Arius Didymus. Rutgers University Studies in Classical Humanities vol. 1. New Brunswick, NJ.Google Scholar

Fortenbaugh, W. W. (ed.) (with Gutas, D.) (2011) Theophrastus of Eresus, Commentary Volume 6.1. Leiden.Google Scholar

Fraade, S. (2008) ‘Hearing and seeing at Sinai. Interpretive trajectories’, in The Significance of Sinai. Traditions about Sinai and Divine Revelation in Judaism and Christianity, ed. Brooke, G. J., Najman, H. and Stuckenbruck, L. T.. Leiden: 247–68.Google Scholar

Frede, M. (1986) ‘The Stoic doctrine of the affections of the soul’, in The Norms of Nature. Studies in Hellenistic Ethics, ed. Schofield, M. and Striker, G. (1986). Cambridge: 93–110.Google Scholar

Frede, M. (1987) ‘On Galen’s epistemology’, in his Essays in Ancient Philosophy. Minneapolis, MN: 279–98.Google Scholar

Frede, M. (1989) ‘Chaeremon von Alexandreia’, in Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt II.36.3, ed. Haase, W.. Berlin and New York: 2067–2103.Google Scholar

Frede, M. (1990) ‘La teoría de las ideas en Longino’, Méthexis 3: 85–98.Google Scholar

Frede, M. (1994) ‘The Stoic conception of reason’, in Hellenistic Philosophy, ed. Boudouris, K.. Athens: 50–63.Google Scholar

Frede, M. (1999a) ‘Stoic epistemology’, in Algra, et al. (1999): 295–322.Google Scholar

Frede, M. (1999b) ‘Epilogue’, in Algra, et al. (1999): 771–97.Google Scholar

Fredriksen, P. (1991) ‘Judaism, the circumcision of Gentiles, and apocalyptic hope’, Journal of Theological Studies 42: 532–64.Google Scholar

Frick, P. (1999) Divine Providence in Philo of Alexandria. Texts and Studies in Ancient Judaism 77. Tübingen.Google Scholar

Früchtel, L. (1964) ‘Über die Vorsehung’, in Philo von Alexandria. Die Werke in deutscher Übersetzung, ed. Cohn, L, Heinemann, I., Adler, M. and Theiler, W., 7 vols. Breslau and Berlin: 7.267–382.Google Scholar

Fuglseth, K. S. (2005) Johannine Sectarianism in Perspective. A Sociological, Historical and Comparative Analysis of Temple and Social Relationships in the Gospel of John, Philo, and Qumran. Novum Testamentum Supplements 119. Leiden.Google Scholar

Gercke, A. (1885) ‘Chrysippea’, Jahrbücher für klassische Philologie (Leipzig): 689–781.Google Scholar

Gerson, L. P. (2005) Aristotle and other Platonists, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar

Gerson, L. P. (2009) Ancient Epistemology. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Gerson, L. P. (2013) From Plato to Platonism, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar

Geytenbeek, A. C. (1963) Musonius Rufus and Greek Diatribe. Assen.Google Scholar

Gildenhard, I. (2013) ‘Of Cicero’s Plato. Fictions, Forms, foundations‘, in Schofield, (2013): 225–75.Google Scholar

Gill, C. (1998) ‘Did Galen understand Platonic and Stoic thinking on emotions?’, in The Emotions in Hellenistic Philosophy, ed. Sihvola, J. and Engberg-Pedersen, T.. Dordrecht: 113–48.Google Scholar

Gill, C. (2003) ‘The School in the Roman imperial period’, in Inwood, (2003): 33–58.Google Scholar

Gill, C. (2004) ‘The Stoic theory of ethical development. In what sense is nature a norm?’, in Was ist das für den Menschen Gute? Menschliche Natur und Güterlehre / What is Good for a Human Being? Human Nature and Values, ed. Szaif, J. and Lutz-Bachmann, M.. Berlin: 101–25.Google Scholar

Gill, C. (2006) The Structured Self in Hellenistic and Roman Thought. Oxford.Google Scholar

Gill, C. (2007) ‘Marcus Aurelius’ Meditations. How Stoic and how Platonic?’, in Bonazzi, and Helmig, (2007a): 189–207.Google Scholar

Gill, C. (2010) Naturalistic Psychology in Galen and Stoicism. Oxford.Google Scholar

Gill, C. (2012) ‘The transformation of Aristotle’s Ethics in Roman philosophy’, in The Reception of Aristotle’s Ethics, ed. Miller, J.. Cambridge: 31–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gill, C. (2015) ‘Antiochus’ theory of oikeiōsis’, in Annas, and Betegh, (2015): 221–47.Google Scholar

Gioè, A. (2002) Filosofi Medioplatonici del II Secolo D.C. Testimonianze e frammenti. Gaio, Albino, Lucio, Nicostrato, Tauro, Severo, Arpocrazione. Elenchos. Collana de testi e studi sul pensiero antico 36. Naples.Google Scholar

Giusta, M. (1964) I dossografi di etica. Vol. 1. Turin.Google Scholar

Glucker, J. (1978) Antiochus and the Late Academy. Göttingen.Google Scholar

Göransson, T. (1995) Albinus, Alcinous, Arius Didymus. Gothenburg.Google Scholar

Görgemanns, H. (1983) ‘Oikeiōsis in Arius Didymus’, in Fortenbaugh, (1983): 165–89.Google Scholar

Görler, W. (1995) ‘Silencing the troublemaker. De Legibus 1.39’, in Cicero the Philosopher, ed. Powell, J. G. F.. Oxford: 85–113.Google Scholar

Gottschalk, H. B. (1987) ‘Aristotelian philosophy in the Roman world from the time of Cicero to the end of the second century AD’, in Aufstieg und Niedergang der Römischen Welt II.36.2, ed. Haase, W.. Berlin and New York: 1079–1174.Google Scholar

Goulet, R. (1989–2012) Dictionnaire des Philosophes Antiques. Vol. 1–5 and Supplément. Paris.Google Scholar

Goulet, R. (2013) ‘Ancient philosophers. A first statistical survey’, in Philosophy as a Way of Life: Ancients and Moderns. Essays in Honor of Pierre Hadot, ed. Chase, M., Clark, S. R. L. and McGhee, M.. Chichester: 10–39.Google Scholar

Goulet-Cazé, M.-O. (2005) ‘Musonius Rufus’, in Goulet, (1989–2012): 4.555–72.Google Scholar

Gourinat, J.-B. (2008) ‘Le Platon de Panétius. À propos d’un témoignage inédit de Galien’, Philosophie antique 8: 139–51.Google Scholar

Gourinat, J.-B. (2009) ‘The Stoics on matter and prime matter. Corporealism and the imprint of Plato’s Timaeus’, in Salles, (2009): 46–70.Google Scholar

Graver, M. (2007) Stoicism and Emotion. Chicago.Google Scholar

Graver, M. (2012) ‘Seneca and the Contemplatio veri’, in Bénatouïl, and Bonazzi, (2012): 73–98.Google Scholar

Graver, M. and Long, A. A. (2015) Seneca. Letters on Ethics. Chicago.Google Scholar

Gray, B. (in press) ‘A later Hellenistic debate about the value of Classical Athenian civic ideals? The evidence of epigraphy, historiography and philosophy’, in The Hellenistic Reception of Classical Athenian Democracy and Political Thought, ed. Canevaro, M. and Gray, B.. Oxford.Google Scholar

Griffin, M. (2015) Aristotle’s Categories in the Early Roman Empire. Oxford.Google Scholar

Gritti, E. (2011) ‘Dossografia sulla percezione nell’Anthologium di Giovanni Stobeo’, in Thinking Through Excerpts. Studies on Stobaeus, ed. Reydams-Schils, G.. Turnhout: 203–42.Google Scholar

Guyau, A. (1946) Epictète et Platon. Paris.Google Scholar

Haas, F. (2014) ‘Presuppositions of moral action in Aristotle and Alexander of Aphrodisias’, in Fate, Providence and Moral Responsibility in Ancient, Medieval and Early Modern Thought. Studies in Honour of Carlos Steel, ed. d’Hoine, P. and Van Riel, G.. Leuven: 103–16.Google Scholar

Hadas-Lebel, M. (1973) De providentia I et II. Les Œuvres de Philon d’Alexandrie 35. Paris.Google Scholar

Hadas-Lebel, M. (2012) Philo of Alexandria. A Thinker in the Jewish Diaspora. Translated by Frechet, R.. Leiden and Boston. Originally published (2003) as Philon d’Alexandrie. Un penseur en diaspora. Paris.Google Scholar

Hadot, P. (1992) Introduction aux ‘Pensées’ de Marc Aurèle. La citadelle intérieure. Paris.Google Scholar

Hadot, P. (1998) Études de philosophie ancienne. Paris.Google Scholar

Hagner, D. (1971) ‘The vision of God in Philo and John. A comparative study’, Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society 14: 81–93.Google Scholar

Hahm, D. E. (1977) The Origins of Stoic Cosmology. Ohio.Google Scholar

Hahm, D. E. (1983) ‘The diaeretic method and the purpose of Arius’ doxography’, in Fortenbaugh, (1983): 15–37.Google Scholar

Hahm, D. E. (1985) ‘The Stoic theory of change’, in Spindel Conference 1984. Recovering the Stoics. Southern Journal of Philosophy 23 Supplement, ed. Epp, R.. Memphis: 39–56.Google Scholar

Hahm, D. E. (1990) ‘The ethical doxography of Arius Didymus’, in Aufstieg und Niedergang der rӧmischen Welt II.36.6, ed. Haase, W. and Temporini, H.. Berlin and New York: 2935–3055.Google Scholar

Halfwassen, J. (1992) Der Aufstieg zum Einen. Untersuchungen zu Platon und Plotinus. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Hamilton, E. and Cairns, H. (eds.) (1961) The Collected Dialogues of Plato. Bollingen Series 71. New York.Google Scholar

Hankinson, R. J. (1997) ‘Natural criteria and the transparency of judgement. Antiochus, Philo and Galen on epistemological justification’, in Assent and Argument, ed. Inwood, B. and Frede, D.. Leiden: 161–216.Google Scholar

Harl, M. (ed.) (1966) Philon Quis rerum divinarum heres sit. Paris.Google Scholar

Harte, V. (2014) ‘The Nicomachean Ethics on pleasure’, in The Cambridge Companion to the Nicomachean Ethics, ed. Polansky, R.. Cambridge: 288–318.Google Scholar

Hatzimichali, M. (2011) Potamo of Alexandria and the Emergence of Eclecticism in Late Hellenistic Philosophy. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Helmig, C. (2012) Forms and Concepts. Concept Formation in the Platonic Tradition. Berlin.Google Scholar

Hengel, M. (1969) Judentum und Hellenismus. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 10. Tübingen.Google Scholar

Hense, O. (ed.) (1905) C. Musonii Rufi Reliquiae. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Hershbell, J. P. (1992a) ‘Plutarch and Epicureanism’, in Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt II.36.5, ed. Haase, W.. Berlin and New York: 3353–83.Google Scholar

Hershbell, J. P. (1992b) ‘Plutarch and Stoicism’, in Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt II.36.5, ed. Haase, W.. Berlin and New York: 3336–52.Google Scholar

Hine, H. (2010) Seneca. Natural Questions. Chicago.Google Scholar

Hirsch-Luipold, R. (2005) ‘Der eine Gott bei Philon von Alexandrien und Plutarch’, in Gott und die Götter bei Plutarch. Götterbilder, Gottesbilder, Weltbilder, ed. Hirsch-Luipold, R.. Berlin: 141–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hirsch-Luipold, R., Görgemanns, H. and von Albrecht, M. (eds.) (2009) Religiöse Philosophie und philosophische Religion der frühen Kaiserzeit. Studien und Texte zu Antike und Christentum 51. Tübingen.Google Scholar

Hodge, C. J. (2007) If Sons, Then Heirs. A Study of Kinship and Ethnicity in the Letters of Paul. Oxford.Google Scholar

Hoek, A. (2000) ‘Philo and Origen. A descriptive catalogue of their relationship’, Studia Philonica Annual 12: 44–121.Google Scholar

Horst, P. W. (1998) ‘“The elements will be dissolved with fire.” The idea of cosmic conflagration in Hellenism, ancient Judaism, and early Christianity’, in van der Horst, P. W., Hellenism–Judaism–Christianity. Essays on Their Interaction. Contributions to Biblical Exegesis and Theology 8. Leuven: 271–92.Google Scholar

Hösle, V. (2008) ‘Cicero’s Plato’, Wiener Studien 121: 145–70.Google Scholar

Hoven, R. (1971) Stoïcisme et stoïciens face au problème de l’au-delà. Paris.Google Scholar

Hübner, H. (1993a) ‘Die Sapientia Salomonis und die antike Philosophie’, in Die Weisheit Salomos im Horizont Biblischer Theologie, ed. Hübner, H.. Biblisch-Theologische Studien 22. Neukirchen-Vluyn: 55–81.Google Scholar

Hübner, H. (1993b) ‘La Sapienza di Salomone e la filosofia antica’, in La Sapienza di Salomone, ed. Hübner, H.. Brescia: 70–97.Google Scholar

Hübner, H. (ed.) (1999) Die Weisheit Salomons. Das Alte Testament Deutsch/Apokryphen 4. Göttingen.Google Scholar

Inwood, B. (1983) ‘Comments on Professor Görgemanns’ paper: “The two forms of oikeiōsis in Arius and the Stoa”’, in Fortenbaugh, (1983): 190–201.Google Scholar

Inwood, B. (1984) ‘Hierocles. Theory and argument in the second century AD’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 2: 151–83.Google Scholar

Inwood, B. (1985) Ethics and Human Action in Early Stoicism. Oxford.Google Scholar

Inwood, B. (1999) ‘Stoic ethics (I–VII)’, in Algra, et al. (1999): 675–705.Google Scholar

Inwood, B. (ed.) (2003) The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Inwood, B. (2005a) Reading Seneca. Stoic Philosophy at Rome. Oxford.Google Scholar

Inwood, B. (2005b) ‘Getting to goodness’, in Inwood, (2005a): 271–301.Google Scholar

Inwood, B. (2007a) Seneca. Selected Philosophical Letters. Oxford.Google Scholar

Inwood, B. (2007b) ‘Seneca, Plato, and Platonism. The case of Letter 65’, in Bonazzi, and Helmig, (2007a): 149–67.Google Scholar

Inwood, B. (2012) ‘Antiochus on physics’, in Sedley, (2012): 188–219.Google Scholar

Inwood, B. (2014a) Ethics After Aristotle. Cambridge, MA and London.Google Scholar

Inwood, B. (2014b) ‘Ancient goods. The tria genera bonorum in ethical theory’, in Strategies of Argument. Essays in Ancient Ethics, Epistemology and Logic, ed. Lee, M.-K.. Oxford: 255–80.Google Scholar

Inwood, B. (2015) ‘The voice of nature’, in Annas, and Betegh, (2015): 147–66.Google Scholar

Inwood, B. (2016) ‘A later (and non-standard) Aristotelian account of moral motivation’, in Moral Motivation. A History, ed. Vasiliou, I.. Oxford.Google Scholar

Ioppolo, A. M. (1986) Opinione e scienza. Naples.Google Scholar

Jagu, A. (1946) Epictète et Platon. Essai sur les relations du Stoïcisme et du Platonisme à propos de la morale des Entretiens. Paris.Google Scholar

Ju, A. E. (2013) ‘Posidonius as historian of philosophy. An interpretation of Plutarch, de Animae Procreatione in Timaeo 22, 1023b–c’, in Schofield, (2013): 95–117.Google Scholar

Kahn, C. H. (1983) ‘Arius as a doxographer’, in Fortenbaugh, (1983): 3–13.Google Scholar

Kamtekar, R. (1998) ‘Aidōs in Epictetus’, Classical Philology 93: 136–60.Google Scholar

Kamtekar, R. (unpublished) ‘Naturalism, ancient and modern. AMC of Brad Inwood, Ethics After Aristotle’, A paper given at the APA Pacific Division, April 2015.Google Scholar

Karamanolis, G. (2006) Plato and Aristotle in Agreement? Oxford.Google Scholar

Kechagia-Ovseiko, E. (2014) ‘Plutarch and Epicureanism’, in Beck, (2014): 104–20.Google Scholar

Kerferd, G. B. (1972) ‘The search for personal identity in Stoic thought’, Bulletin of the John Rylands University Library of Manchester 55: 177–96.Google Scholar

Kidd, I. (1971) ‘Posidonius on emotions’, in Problems in Stoicism, ed. Long, A. A.. London: 200–15.Google Scholar

Kidd, I. (1988) ‘Posidonius as philosopher-historian’, in Philosophia Togata, ed. Griffin, M. and Barnes, J.. Oxford: 38–50.Google Scholar

King, K. L. (2003) What Is Gnosticism? Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

King, K. L. (2006) The Secret Revelation of John. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Knust, J. (2006) ‘Early Christian re-writing and the history of the pericope adulterae’, Journal of Early Christian Studies 14: 485–536.Google Scholar

Köckert, C. (2009) Christliche Kosmologie und kaiserzeitliche Philosophie. Die Auslegung des Schöpfungsberichtes bei Origines, Basilius und Gregor von Nyssa vor dem Hintergrund kaiserzeitlicher Timaeus-Interpretationen. Tübingen.Google Scholar

Koester, C. R. (1989) ‘Hearing, seeing and believing in the Gospel of John’, Biblica 70: 327–48.Google Scholar

Kooten, G. (2008) Paul’s Anthropology in Context. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 232. Tübingen.Google Scholar

Krämer, H. J. (1964) Der Ursprung der Geistmetaphysik. Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Lacy, Ph. (1943) ‘The logical structure of the ethics of Epictetus’, Classical Philology 38.2: 112–15.Google Scholar

Lacy, Ph. (ed.) (1978–84) Galen. De Placitis Hippocratis et Platonis, with tr. and comm., 3 vols. Berlin.Google Scholar

Larcher, C. (1969) Études sur le Livre de la Sagesse. Études bibliques. Paris.Google Scholar

Larcher, C. (1983–5) Le Livre de la Sagesse ou La Sagesse de Salomon, 3 vols. Études bibliques 1, 3, 5. Paris.Google Scholar

Laurand, V. (2014) Stoïcisme et lien social. Enquête autour de Musonius Rufus. Paris.Google Scholar

Layton, B. (1987) Gnostic Scriptures. Garden City, NY.Google Scholar

Leonhardt-Balzer, J. (2004) ‘Der Logos und die Schöpfung. Streiflichter bei Philo (Op 20–25) und im Johannesprolog (Joh 1,1–18)’, in Kontexte des Johannesevangeliums. Das vierte Evangelium in religions- und traditionsgeschichtlicher Perspektive, ed. Frey, J. and Schnelle, U.. Tübingen: 295–319.Google Scholar

Lévy, C. (1984) ‘La dialectique de Cicéron dans les livres II et IV du De finibus’, Revue des études latines 62: 111–27.Google Scholar

Lévy, C. (1992) Cicero Academicus. Recherches sur les Académiques et sur la philosophie cicéronienne. Rome.Google Scholar

Lévy, C. (1999) ‘Permanence et mutations d’un projet aristotélicien. La doxographie morale d’Aristote à Varron’, Méthexis 12: 35–51.Google Scholar

Lévy, C. (2008) ‘La conversion du scepticisme chez Philon d’Alexandrie’, in Alesse, (2008): 103–20.Google Scholar

Lévy, C. (2010) ‘Breaking the Stoic language. Philo’s attitude towards assent (sunkatathesis) and comprehension (katalepsis)’, Henoch 32: 33–44.Google Scholar

Lévy, C. (2011) ‘L’aristotélisme parent pauvre de la pensée philonienne?’, in Plato, Aristotle or Both? Dialogues between Platonism and Aristotelianism in Antiquity, ed. Benatouïl, T., Maffi, E. and Trabattoni, F.. Hildesheim: 17–33.Google Scholar

Lilla, S. R. C. (1997) ‘Neoplatonic hypostases and the Christian Trinity’, in Studies in Plato and the Platonic Tradition, ed. Joyal, M. A.. Aldershot, UK, and Brookfield, VT: 127–89.Google Scholar

Litwa, M. D. (2012) We Are Being Transformed. Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft 187. Berlin.Google Scholar

Löhr, W. (2010), ‘Christianity as philosophy. Problems and perspectives of an ancient intellectual project’, Vigiliae Christianae 64: 160–88.Google Scholar

Long, A. A. (1982) ‘Ptolemy On the Criterion. An epistemology for the practising scientist’, in Dillon, and Long, (1982): 176–207.Google Scholar

Long, A. A. (1983) ‘Arius Didymus and the exposition of Stoic ethics’, in Fortenbaugh, (1983): 41–65.Google Scholar

Long, A. A. (1988) ‘Socrates in Hellenistic philosophy’, Classical Quarterly 38: 150–71.Google Scholar

Long, A. A. (1995) ‘Cicero’s Plato and Aristotle’, in Cicero the Philosopher, ed. Powell, J. G. F.. Oxford: 37–62. (Also in Long, A. A. [2006a]: 285–306.)Google Scholar

Long, A. A. (1996a) Stoic Studies. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Long, A. A. (1996b) ‘Soul and body in Stoicism’, in Long, A. A. (1996a): 224–49.Google Scholar

Long, A. A. (1999) ‘Stoic psychology’, in Algra, et al. (1999): 560–84.Google Scholar

Long, A. A. (2002) Epictetus. A Stoic and Socratic Guide to Life. Oxford.Google Scholar

Long, A. A. (2003) ‘Roman philosophy’, in Sedley, (2003c): 184–210.Google Scholar

Long, A. A. (2006a) From Epicurus to Epictetus. Studies in Hellenistic and Roman Philosophy. Oxford.Google Scholar

Long, A. A. (2006b) ‘Scepticism about gods’, in Long, A. A. (2006a): 114–27.Google Scholar

Long, A. A. (2008) ‘Philo on Stoic physics’, in Alesse, (2008): 121–41.Google Scholar

Long, A. A. (2010) ‘Cosmic craftsmanship in Plato and Stoicism’, in One Book, The Whole Universe. Plato’s Timaeus Today, ed. Mohr, R. and Sattler, B.. Las Vegas: 37–53.Google Scholar

Long, A. A. and Sedley, D. N. (eds.) (1987) The Hellenistic Philosophers, 2 vols. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Long, A. G. (ed.) (2013a) Plato and the Stoics. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Long, A. G. (ed.) (2013b) ‘Subtexts, connections and open opposition’, in Long, A. G. (2013a): 106–27.Google Scholar

Longrigg, J. (1975) ‘Elementary physics in the Lyceum and Stoa’, Isis 66: 211–29.Google Scholar

Lorenz, H. (2006) The Brute Within. Appetitive Desire in Plato and Aristotle. Oxford.Google Scholar

Lorenz, H. (2011) ‘Posidonius on the nature and treatment of the emotions’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 40: 189–211.Google Scholar

Lorenzen, S. (2008) Das paulinische Eikon-Konzept. Semantische Analysen zur Sapientia Salomonis, zu Philo und den Paulusbriefen. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 2.250. Tübingen.Google Scholar

Luck, G. (1953) Der Akademiker Antiochos. Berne.Google Scholar

Luttikhuizen, G. P. (2006) ‘The revelation of the unknowable God in Coptic gnostic texts’, in The Revelation of the Name YHWH to Moses. Perspectives from Judaism, the Pagan Graeco-Roman World, and Early Christianity, ed. van Kooten, G. H.. Themes in Biblical Narrative 9. Leiden and Boston: 237–46.Google Scholar

Lutz, C. (1947) ‘Musonius “The Roman Socrates”’, Yale Classical Studies 10: 3–147.Google Scholar

Macdonald, P. (2003) History of the Concept of Mind. Speculations about the Soul, Mind and Spirit from Homer to Hume. Burlington.Google Scholar

Mack, B. L. (1984) ‘Philo and exegetical tradition in Alexandria’, in Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt II.21.1, ed. Haase, W.. Berlin and New York: 227–71.Google Scholar

Magnaldi, G. (1991) L’oikeiōsis peripatetica in Ario Didimo e nel ‘De Finibus’ di Cicerone. Turin.Google Scholar

Malherbe, A. J. (1989) Paul and the Popular Philosophers. Minneapolis.Google Scholar

Malherbe, A. J. (1992) ‘Hellenistic moralists and the New Testament’, in Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt II.26.1, ed. Haase, W.. Berlin and New York: 267–333. (Also in Malherbe, [2014]: 674–747.)Google Scholar

Malherbe, A. J. (2010) ‘Godliness, self-sufficiency, greed and the enjoyment of wealth. 1 Timothy 6:3-19’, Novum Testamentum 52: 376–405.Google Scholar

Malherbe, A. J. (2014) Light from the Gentiles. Hellenistic Philosophy and Early Christianity. Collected Essays, 1959–2012, ed. Holladay, C. R., Fitzgerald, J. T., Sterling, G. E. and Thompson, J. W., 2 vols. Leiden.Google Scholar

Mansfeld, J. (1979) ‘Providence and the destruction of the universe in early Stoic thought’, in Studies in Hellenistic religions, ed. Vermaseren, M. J.. Études préliminaires aux religions orientales dans l’Empire romain 78. Leiden: 129–88; repr. in Mansfeld, (1989).Google Scholar

Mansfeld, J. (1983) ‘Resurrection added. The interpretatio christiana of a Stoic doctrine’, Vigiliae Christianae 37: 218–33.Google Scholar

Mansfeld, J. (1989) Studies in Later Greek Philosophy and Gnosticism. London.Google Scholar

Mansfeld, J. (2001) ‘Plato, Pythagoras, Aristotle, the Peripatetics, the Stoics and Thales and his followers “On Causes” (Ps-Plutarchus Placita I 11 and Stobaeus Anthologium I 13)’, in Antichi e Moderni nella Filosofia di Età Imperiale, ed. Brancacci, A.. Naples: 17–68.Google Scholar

Mansfeld, J. and Runia, D. T. (1997) Aëtiana. The Method and Intellectual Context of a Doxographer. Vol. 1. Philosophia Antiqua 73. Leiden.Google Scholar

Marcus, R. (ed. and tr.) (1953) Philo. Questions and Answers on Genesis. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Markschies, C. (1992) Valentinus Gnosticus? Untersuchungen zur valentinianischen Gnosis mit einem Kommentar zu den Fragmenten Valentins. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 65. Tübingen.Google Scholar

Mazzarelli, C. (1985) ‘Raccolta e interpretazione delle testimonianze e dei frammenti del medioplatonico Eudoro di Alessandria’, Rivista di Filosofia Neoscolastica 77: 197–209, 535–55.Google Scholar

Mazzinghi, L. (2010) ‘Law of nature and light of the law in the Book of Wisdom (Wis 18:4c)’, in Studies in the Book of Wisdom, ed. Xeravits, G. G. and Zsengellér, J.. Journal of the Study of Judaism in the Persian, Hellenistic and Roman Period Supplements 142. Leiden and Boston: 37–59.Google Scholar

McConnell, S. (2014) Philosophical Life in Cicero’s Letters. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Meeks, W. A. (1976) ‘The divine agent and its counterfeit in Philo and the Fourth Gospel’, in Aspects of Religious Propaganda in Judaism and Early Christianity, ed. Fiorenza, E. Schüssler. Notre Dame, IN: 43–67.Google Scholar

Merlan, P. (1967) ‘The later Academy and Platonism’, in The Cambridge History of Later Greek and Early Medieval Philosophy, ed. Armstrong, A. H.. Cambridge: 53–83.Google Scholar

Miller, P. (2006) ‘“They saw his glory and spoke of him.” The Gospel of John and the Old Testament’, in Hearing the Old Testament in the New Testament, ed. Porter, S. E.. Grand Rapids, MI: 127–51.Google Scholar

Moraux, P. (1973–2001) Der Aristotelismus bei den Griechen, 3 vols. Berlin.Google Scholar

Moraux, P. (1984) Der Aristotelismus bei den Griechen von Andronikos bis Alexander von Aphrodisias. Vol. 2: Der Aristotelismus im I. und II. Jh. n. Chr. Berlin and New York.Google Scholar

Morford, M. (2002) The Roman Philosophers. London.Google Scholar

Moss, J. (2010) ‘Aristotle’s non-trivial, non-insane view that everyone always desires things under the guise of the good’, in Desire, Practical Reason, and the Good, ed. Tenenbaum, S.. Oxford: 65–81.Google Scholar

Nesselrath, H.-G. (2009) Cornutus, Die Griechischen Götter. Ein Überblick über Namen, Bilder und Deutungen. SAPERE 14. Tübingen.Google Scholar

Newman, C. (1992) Paul’s Glory Christology. Traditions and Rhetoric. Leiden.Google Scholar

Niehoff, M. (2011a) Jewish Exegesis and Homeric Scholarship in Alexandria. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Niehoff, M. (2011b) ‘Philo’s exposition in a Roman context’, Studia Philonica Annual 23: 1–21.Google Scholar

Nielsen, K. (2012) ‘The Nicomachean Ethics in Hellenistic philosophy. A hidden treasure’, in The Reception of Aristotle’s Ethics, ed. Miller, J.. Cambridge: 5–30.Google Scholar

Nightingale, A. and Sedley, D. N. (eds.) (2010) Ancient Models of Mind. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Nikiprowetzky, V. (1977) Le commentaire de l’Écriture chez Philon d’Alexandrie. Son caractère et sa portée; observations philologiques. Arbeiten zur Literatur und Geschichte des hellenistischen Judentums 11. Leiden.Google Scholar

Olivieri, M. (2000) Il secondo libro del De Providentia di Filone di Alessandria. I frammenti greci e la tradizione armena. Diss. Bologna.Google Scholar

Olivieri, M. (2011) ‘Philo’s De Providentia. A work between two traditions’, in Studies on the Ancient Armenian Version of Philo’s Works, ed. Lombardi, S. M. and Pontani, P.. Leiden: 87–124.Google Scholar

O’Meara, D. (1999) ‘Epicurus Neoplatonicus’, in Zur Rezeption der hellenistischen Philosophie in der Spätantike, ed. Fuhrer, Th. and Erler, M.. Stuttgart: 83–91.Google Scholar

O’Meara, D. (2000) ‘Scepticism and ineffability in Plotinus’, Phronesis 45: 240–51.Google Scholar

Opsomer, J. (1997) ‘Favorinus versus Epictetus on the philosophical heritage of Plutarch. A debate on epistemology’, in Plutarch and His Intellectual World. Essays on Plutarch, ed. Mossman, J.. London and Swansea: 17–39.Google Scholar

Opsomer, J. (1998) In Search of The Truth. Academic Tendencies in Middle Platonism. Brussels.Google Scholar

Opsomer, J. (2005) ‘Plutarch’s Platonism revisited’, in Bonazzi, and Celluprica, (2005): 161–200.Google Scholar

Opsomer, J. (2007) ‘The place of Plutarch in the history of Platonism’, in Plutarco e la cultura della sua età. Atti del X Convegno plutarcheo Fisciano – Paestum, 27–29 ottobre 2005 ed. Cacciatore, P. Volpe and Ferrari, F.. Naples: 281–309.Google Scholar

Opsomer, J. (2012) ‘Plutarch on the division of the soul’, in Plato and the divided self, ed. Barney, R., Brennan, T. and Brittain, C.. Cambridge: 311–30.Google Scholar

Opsomer, J. (2014) ‘Plutarch and the Stoics’, in Beck, (2014): 88–103.Google Scholar

Owen, G. (1971) ‘Aristotelian pleasures’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 72 (1971–2): 135–52.Google Scholar

Passaro, A. (2010) ‘Cosmology and music. Wis 19:18 and the concept of creation in the Book of Wisdom’, in Studies in the Book of Wisdom, ed. Xeravits, G. G. and Zsengellér, J.. Journal of the Study of Judaism in the Persian, Hellenistic and Roman Period Supplements 142. Leiden and Boston: 101–23.Google Scholar

Pearson, B. (2007) Ancient Gnosticism. Traditions and Literature. Minneapolis.Google Scholar

Pembroke, S. G. (1971) ‘oikeiōsis’, in Problems in Stoicism, ed. Long, A. A.. London: 114–49.Google Scholar

Phillips, J. (1987) ‘Stoic “common notions” in Plotinus’, Dionysius 11: 33–52.Google Scholar

Pohlenz, M. (1942) ‘Philon von Alexandreia’, Nachrichten der Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, Philologisch-Historische Klasse 5: 409–87; repr. in Kleine Schriften, ed. Dörrie, H.. Hildesheim (1965): 1.305–83.Google Scholar

Pohlenz, M. (1948) Die Stoa. Geschichte einer geistigen Bewegung. Göttingen.Google Scholar

Porter, S. E. (2015) John, His Gospel, and Jesus. In Pursuit of the Johannine Voice. Grand Rapids, MI.Google Scholar

Powell, J. G. F. (2001) ‘Were Cicero’s Laws the laws of Cicero’s Republic?’, in Cicero’s Republic, ed. Powell, J. G. F. and North, J.. Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies Supplement 76. London: 7–39.Google Scholar

Powers, N. (2013) ‘Plato’s demiurge as the precursor to the Stoic providential god’, Classical Quarterly N.S. 63: 713–22.Google Scholar

Puech, B. (1994) ‘Diadouménos’, in Goulet, (1989–2012): 2.750.Google Scholar

Rabens, V. (2012) ‘Johannine perspectives on ethical enabling in the context of Stoic and Philonic Ethics’, in Rethinking the Ethics of John. ‘Implicit Ethics’ in the Johannine Writings. Kontexte und Normen neutestamentlicher Ethik, ed. van der Watt, J. G. and Zimmermann, R.. Contexts and Norms of New Testament Ethics 3. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 291. Tübingen: 114–39.Google Scholar

Radice, R. (2000) ‘Oikeiosis’. Ricerche sul fondamento del pensiero Stoico e sulla sua genesi. Milan.Google Scholar

Ramelli, I. (2003) Anneo Cornuto, Compendio di teologia greca. Testo Greco a fronte. Milan.Google Scholar

Ramelli, I. (ed.) (2008) Stoici Romani Minori. Milan.Google Scholar

Rashed, M. (2013) ‘Boethus’ Aristotelian Ontology’, in Schofield, (2013): 53–77.Google Scholar

Rasimus, T. (2009) Paradise Reconsidered in Gnostic Mythmaking. Rethinking Sethianism in the Light of the Ophite Evidence. Nag Hammadi and Manichaean Studies 68. Leiden.Google Scholar

Rasimus, T., Engberg-Pedersen, T. and Dunderberg, I. (eds.) (2010) Stoicism in Early Christianity. Grand Rapids, MI.Google Scholar

Ready, J. (2012) ‘Zeus, ancient Near Eastern notions of divine incomparability, and similes in the Homeric Epics’, Classical Antiquity 31: 56–91.Google Scholar

Reale, G. (1989) Storia della filosofia antica. Vol. iv. 6th ed. Milan.Google Scholar

Reese, J. M. (1970) Hellenistic Influence on the Book of Wisdom and Its Consequences. Rome.Google Scholar

Reid, J. S. (1885) M. Tulli Ciceronis Academica, the Text revised and Explained by J. S. R. London.Google Scholar

Reinhardt, T. (2007) ‘Andronicus of Rhodes and Boethus of Sidon on Aristotle’s Categories’, in Sorabji, and Sharples, (2007): 2.513–29.Google Scholar

Reis, B. (1999) Der Platoniker Albinos und sein sogenannter ‘Prologos’. Prolegomena, Überlieferungsgeschichte, kritische Edition und Übersetzung. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar

Reydams-Schils, G. (1995) ‘Stoicized readings of Plato’s Timaeus in Philo of Alexandria’, Studia Philonica Annual 7: 85–102.Google Scholar

Reydams-Schils, G. (1997) ‘Posidonius and the Timaeus. Off to Rhodes and back to Plato?’, Classical Quarterly 47: 455–76.Google Scholar

Reydams-Schils, G. (1999) Demiurge and Providence. Monothéismes et Philosophie. Turnhout.Google Scholar

Reydams-Schils, G. (2005) The Roman Stoics. Self, Responsibility, and Affection. Chicago.Google Scholar

Reydams-Schils, G. (2010) ‘Seneca’s Platonism. The soul and its divine origin’, in Nightingale, and Sedley, (2010), 196–215.Google Scholar

Reydams-Schils, G. (2013) ‘The Old Academy, the Stoics, Antiochus of Ascalon, and Cicero on Plato’s Timaeus’, in Long, A. G. (2013): 29–58.Google Scholar

Robinson, J. M. (2014) The Nag Hammadi Story, 2 vols. Leiden and Boston.Google Scholar

Roskam, G. (2002) ‘A παιδεία for the ruler. Plutarch’s dream of collaboration between philosopher and ruler’, in Sage and Emperor. Plutarch, Greek Intellectuals and Roman Power in the Time of Trajan (98–117 A.D.), ed. Stadter, P. A. and Van der Stockt, L.. Leuven: 175–89.Google Scholar

Roskam, G. (2005) On the Path to Virtue. The Stoic Doctrine of Moral Progress and Its Reception in (Middle-)Platonism. Leuven.Google Scholar

Roukema, R. (2009) ‘Jesus and the divine name in the Gospel of John’, in The Revelation of the Name YHWH to Moses. Perspectives from Judaism, the Pagan Graeco-Roman World, and Early Christianity, ed. van Kooten, G. H.. Themes in Biblical Narrative 9. Leiden and Boston: 207–23.Google Scholar

Royse, J. R. (2009) ‘The works of Philo’, in The Cambridge Companion to Philo, ed. Kamesar, A.. Cambridge: 32–64.Google Scholar

Runia, D. T. (1981) ‘Philo’s De aeternitate mundi. The problem of its interpretation’, Vigiliae Christianae 35: 105–51; repr. in Runia (1990).Google Scholar

Runia, D. T. (1986) Philo of Alexandria and the Timaeus of Plato. 2nd ed. Philosophia Antiqua 44. Leiden.Google Scholar

Runia, D. T. (1988) ‘Naming and knowing. Themes in Philonic theology with special reference to the De mutatione nominum’, in Knowledge of God in the Graeco-Roman World, ed. van den Broek, R., Baarda, T. and Mansfeld, J.. Études préliminaires aux religions orientales dans l’Empire romain 112. Leiden and New York: 69–91.Google Scholar

Runia, D. T. (1990) Exegesis and Philosophy. Studies on Philo of Alexandria. Variorum Collected Studies Series. London.Google Scholar

Runia, D. T. (1993a) Philo in Early Christian Literature. A Survey. Compendia rerum Iudaicarum ad Novum Testamentum 3. Minneapolis.Google Scholar

Runia, D. T. (1993b) ‘Was Philo a Middle Platonist? A difficult question revisited’, Studia Philonica Annual 5: 112–40.Google Scholar

Runia, D. T. (1996) ‘Additional fragments of Arius Didymus on physics’, in Polyhistor. Studies in the History and Historiography of Ancient Philosophy Presented to Jaap Mansfeld, ed. Algra, K., van der Horst, P. W. and Runia, D.. Leiden: 363–83.Google Scholar

Runia, D. T. (1999) ‘Philo of Alexandria and the Greek Hairesis-model’, Vigiliae Christianae 53, 2: 117–47.Google Scholar

Runia, D. T. (2001) Philo of Alexandria. On the Creation of the Cosmos According to Moses. Leiden.Google Scholar

Runia, D. T. (2003) ‘Plato’s Timaeus, first principle(s) and creation in Philo and Early Christian thought’, in Plato’s Timaeus as Cultural Icon, ed. Reydams-Schils, G.. Notre Dame: 133–51.Google Scholar

Runia, D. T. (2008) ‘Philo and Hellenistic doxography’, in Alesse, (2008): 13–52.Google Scholar

Runia, D. T. (2011) ‘Ancient philosophy and the New Testament. “Exemplar” as example’, in Method and Meaning. Essays on New Testament Interpretation in Honor of Harold W. Attridge, ed. McGowan, A. B. and Richards, K. H.. Atlanta: 347–61.Google Scholar

Russell, D. (2010) ‘Virtue and happiness in the Lyceum and beyond’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 38: 143–85.Google Scholar

Salles, R. (ed.) (2005) Metaphysics, Soul, and Ethics in Ancient Thought. Oxford.Google Scholar

Salles, R. (ed.) (2009a) God and Cosmos in Stoicism. Oxford.Google Scholar

Salles, R. (2009b) ‘Chrysippus on conflagration and the indestructibility of the cosmos’, in Salles, (2009a): 118–34.Google Scholar

Sandbach, F. H. (1930) ‘Ennoia and Prolepsis in the Stoic theory of knowledge’, Classical Quarterly 24: 44–51.Google Scholar

Schenke, G. (2008) ‘The relationship of the Gospel of Judas to the New Testament and to Sethianism. Appended by a new English translation of the Gospel of Judas’, Journal of Coptic Studies 10: 63–98.Google Scholar

Schneider, J.-P. (1994) ‘Boéthus de Sidon RE 9’, in Goulet, (1989–2012): 2.126–30.Google Scholar

Schofield, M. (1980) ‘Preconception, argument, and God’, in Doubt and Dogmatism. Studies in Hellenistic Epistemology, ed. Barnes, J. and Schofield, M.. Cambridge: 283–308.Google Scholar

Schofield, M. (1983) ‘The syllogisms of Zeno of Citium’, Phronesis 28: 31–58.Google Scholar

Schofield, M. (1999) The Stoic Idea of the City, expanded edition. Chicago.Google Scholar

Schofield, M. (2008) ‘Ciceronian dialogue’, in The End of Dialogue in Antiquity, ed. Goldhill, S.. Cambridge: 63–84.Google Scholar

Schofield, M. (2012a) ‘Antiochus on social virtue’, in Sedley, (2012): 173–87.Google Scholar

Schofield, M. (2012b) ‘The neutralizing argument. Carneades, Antiochus, Cicero’, in Sedley, (2012): 237–49.Google Scholar

Schofield, M. (ed.) (2013) Aristotle, Plato and Pythagoreanism in the First Century BC. New Directions for Philosophy. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Schrenk, L. P. (1991a) ‘A Middle Platonic reading of Plato’s theory of recollection’, Ancient Philosophy 11: 103–10.Google Scholar

Schrenk, L. P. (1991b) ‘Faculties of judgment in the Didaskalikos’, Mnemosyne 44: 347–63.Google Scholar

Schrenk, L. P. (1993) ‘The Middle Platonist reception of Aristotelian science’, Rheinisches Museum 136: 342–59.Google Scholar

Scott, J. M. (1995) Paul and the Nations. Tübingen.Google Scholar

Sedley, D. N. (1982) ‘On signs’, in Science and Speculation, ed. Barnes, J., Brunschwig, J., Burnyeat, M. and Schofield, M.. Cambridge-Paris: 239–72.Google Scholar

Sedley, D. N. (1996) ‘Alcinous’ epistemology’, in Polyhistor. Studies in the History and Historiography of Ancient Philosophy Presented to Jaap Mansfeld on his Sixtieth Birthday, ed. Algra, K., van der Horst, P. W. and Runia, D.. Leiden: 300–12.Google Scholar

Sedley, D. N. (1997a) ‘Plato’s auctoritas and the rebirth of the commentary tradition’, in Philosophia Togata II. Plato and Aristotle at Rome, ed. Barnes, J. and Griffin, M.. Oxford: 110–29.Google Scholar

Sedley, D. N. (1997b) ‘“Becoming like god” in the Timaeus and Aristotle’, in Interpreting the Timaeus-Critias, ed. Calvo, T. and Brisson, L.. Sankt Augustin.Google Scholar

Sedley, D. N. (1999) ‘The ideal of godlikeness’, in Plato 2 – Ethics, Politics, Religion and the Soul, ed. Fine, G.. Oxford.Google Scholar

Sedley, D. N. (2002a), ‘Aristotelian relativities’, in Le style de la pensée, ed. Canto-Sperber, M. and Pellegrin, P.. Paris: 324–52.Google Scholar

Sedley, D. N. (2002b) ‘The origins of Stoic god’, in Traditions of Theology, ed. Frede, D. and Laks, A.. Leiden: 41–83.Google Scholar

Sedley, D. N. (2003a) ‘The school from Zeno to Arius Didymus’, in Inwood, (2003): 7–32.Google Scholar

Sedley, D. N. (2003b) ‘Philodemus and the decentralisation of philosophy’, Cronache ercolanesi 33: 31–41.Google Scholar

Sedley, D. N. (ed.) (2003c) The Cambridge Companion to Greek and Roman Philosophy. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Sedley, D. N. (2005) ‘Stoic metaphysics at Rome’, in Salles, (2005): 117–42.Google Scholar

Sedley, D. N. (ed.) (2012a) The Philosophy of Antiochus. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Sedley, D. N. (2012b) ‘Introduction’, in Sedley, (2012a): 1–8.Google Scholar

Sedley, D. N. (2012c) ‘Antiochus as historian of philosophy’, in Sedley, (2012a): 80–103.Google Scholar

Sedley, D. N. (2012d) ‘The theoretikos bios in Alcinous’, in Bénatouïl, and Bonazzi, (2012): 163–81.Google Scholar

Sedley, D. N. (2013) ‘Cicero and the Timaeus’, in Schofield, (2013): 187–205.Google Scholar

Sharples, R. W. (1983) Alexander of Aphrodisias. On Fate. London.Google Scholar

Sharples, R. W. (1989) ‘The criterion of truth in Philo Judaeus, Alcinous, and Alexander of Aphrodisias’, in The Criterion of Truth. Essays Written in Honour of George Kerferd, ed. Huby, P. and Seal, G.. Liverpool: 231–56.Google Scholar

Sharples, R. W. (1990) Alexander of Aphrodisias. Ethical Problems. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar

Sharples, R. W. (1995) ‘Counting Plato’s principles’, in The Passionate Intellect, ed. Ayres, L.. New Brunswick: 67–82.Google Scholar

Sharples, R. W. (2004) Alexander of Aphrodisias. Supplement to On the Soul. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar

Sharples, R. W. (2007) ‘Peripatetics on happiness’, in Sorabji, and Sharples, (2007): 2.627–37.Google Scholar

Sharples, R. W. (2008a) Alexander of Aphrodisias, De anima libri mantissa. Berlin.Google Scholar

Sharples, R. W. (2008b) ‘Habent sua fata libelli. Aristotle’s Categories in the first century BC’, Acta Antiqua Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 48: 273–87.Google Scholar

Sharples, R. W. (2010a) Peripatetic Philosophy 200 BC to 200 AD. An Introduction and Collection of Sources in Translation. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Sharples, R. W. (2010b) ‘Peripatetics’, in The Cambridge History of Philosophy in Later Antiquity, ed. Gerson, L. P.. Vol. I. Cambridge: 140–60.Google Scholar

Shields, C. (2011) ‘Perfecting pleasures. The metaphysics of pleasure in Nicomachean Ethics X’, in Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics. A Critical Guide, ed. Miller, J.. Cambridge: 191–220.Google Scholar

Siegert, F. (1988) Philon von Alexandrien: Über die Gottesbezeichnung ‘wohltätig verzehrendes Feuer’ (De Deo). Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 46. Tübingen.Google Scholar

Siegert, F. (1998) ‘The Philonian fragment De Deo. First English translation’, Studia Philonica Annual 10: 1–33.Google Scholar

Siegert, F. (2004) ‘Der Logos, “älterer Sohn” des Schöpfers und “zweiter Gott”. Philons Logos und der Johannesprolog’, in Kontexte des Johannesevangeliums. Das vierte Evangelium in religions- und traditionsgeschichtlicher Perspektive, ed. Frey, J. and Schnelle, U.. Tübingen: 277–93.Google Scholar

Siegert, F. and Bergler, S. (2010) Synopse der vorkanonischen Jesusüberlieferungen. Zeichenquelle und Passionsbericht, die Logienquelle und der Grundbestand des Markusevangeliums in deutscher Übersetzung gegenübergestellt von Folker Siegert. Rekonstruktion der Zeichenquelle von Siegfried Bergler. Schriften des Institutum Judaicum Delitzschianum 8/1. Göttingen.Google Scholar

Smith, J. Z. (1990) Drudgery Divine. On the Comparison of Early Christianities and the Religions of Late Antiquity. Chicago.Google Scholar

Smith, M. S. (2001) The Origins of Biblical Monotheism. Israel’s Polytheistic Background and the Ugaritic Texts. Oxford.Google Scholar

Smith, M. S. (2008) God in Translation. Deities in Cross-Cultural Discourse in the Biblical World. Tübingen.Google Scholar

Sommer, B. (2009) The Bodies of God and the World of Ancient Israel. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Sorabji, R. (2000) Emotion and Peace of Mind. From Stoic Agitation to Christian Temptation. Oxford.Google Scholar

Sorabji, R. (2005) The Philosophy of the Commentators 200–600 AD. Vol. 1: Psychology (with Ethics and Religion). London.Google Scholar

Sorabji, R. (2007a) ‘Introduction’, in Sorabji, and Sharples, (2007): 1–32.Google Scholar

Sorabji, R. (2007b) ‘What is new on emotion in Stoicism after 100 BC?’, in Sorabji, and Sharples, (2007): 163–74.Google Scholar

Sorabji, R. and Sharples, R. W. (eds.) (2007) Greek & Roman Philosophy 100 BC – 200 AD, 2 vols. Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies Supplement 94. London.Google Scholar

Sterling, G. E. (1992) ‘Creatio temporalis, aeterna, vel continua? An analysis of the thought of Philo of Alexandria’, Studia Philonica Annual 4: 15–41.Google Scholar

Sterling, G. E. (1993) ‘Platonizing Moses. Philo and Middle Platonism’, Studia Philonica Annual 5: 96–111.Google Scholar

Sterling, G. E. (1995) ‘Wisdom among the perfect. Creation traditions in Alexandrian Judaism and Corinthian Christianity’, Novum Testamentum 37: 355–84.Google Scholar

Sterling, G. E. (2012) ‘“The Image of God”. Becoming like God in Philo, Paul, and Early Christianity’, in Portraits of Jesus. Studies in Christology, ed. Myers, S. E.. Tübingen: 157–73.Google Scholar

Stowers, S. (1994) A Rereading of Romans. Justice, Jews and Gentiles. New Haven.Google Scholar

Stowers, S. (2003) ‘Paul and self-mastery’, in Paul in the Greco-Roman World, ed. Sampley, J. P.. Harrisburg: 524–50.Google Scholar

Stowers, S. (2008a) ‘What is Pauline participation in Christ’, in New Views of Jewish and Christian Self-Definition. Essays in Honor of E. P. Sanders, ed. Chancey, M., Heschel, S. and Udoh, F.. Notre Dame: 352–71.Google Scholar

Stowers, S. (2008b) ‘Two kinds of self. A response to Ekkehard W. Stegemann’, in Reformation Readings of Romans, ed. Ehrensperger, K. and Holder, R. W.. London: 50–6.Google Scholar

Stowers, S. (2009) ‘The Apostle Paul’, in The History of the Western Philosophy of Religion (vol. 1), ed. Oppy, G. and Trakakis, N.. Oxford: 145–57.Google Scholar

Stowers, S. (2011a) ‘The religion of plant and animal offerings versus the religion of meanings, essences and textual mysteries’, in Ancient Mediterranean Sacrifice, ed. Knust, J. W. and Varhelyi, Z.. Oxford: 35–56.Google Scholar

Stowers, S. (2011b) ‘Paul’s four discourses about sin’, in Celebrating Paul. Festschrift in Honor of Jerome Murphy-O’Connor, O.P., and Joseph A. Fitzmyer, S. J., ed. Spitaler, P.. Washington, DC: 100–27.Google Scholar

Stowers, S. (2012) ‘Gods, monotheism and ancient Mediterranean religion’, A paper presented at the Brown Seminar for Culture and Religion of the Ancient Mediterranean and the Columbia University New Testament Seminar.Google Scholar

Stowers, S. (2013) ‘Paul as hero of subjectivity’, in Paul and the Philosophers, ed. Blanton, W. and de Vries, H.. New York: 159–74.Google Scholar

Stowers, S. (2015) ‘Paul and the terrain of philosophy’, Early Christianity 6: 141–56.Google Scholar

Striker, G. (1996a) Essays on Hellenistic Epistemology and Ethics. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Striker, G. (1996b) ‘Kriterion tes aletheias’, in Striker, (1996a): 22–76.Google Scholar

Struck, P. (2004) The Birth of the Symbol. Ancient Readers and the Limits of Their Texts. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Szaif, J. (2012) Gut des Menschen. Untersuchungen zur Problematik und Entwicklung der Glücksethik bei Aristoteles und in der Tradition des Peripatos. Berlin.Google Scholar

Szlezák, T. A. (2010) review of Dörrie, H. et al., Der Platonismus in der Antike, Gnomon 82: 389–404.Google Scholar

Tarrant, H. (1993) Thrasyllian Platonism. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar

Tarrant, H. (2005) Recollecting Plato’s Meno, London.Google Scholar

Tarrant, H. (2007) ‘Moral goal and moral virtues in Middle Platonism’, in Sorabji, and Sharples, (2007): 419–29.Google Scholar

Tarrant, H. (2008) ‘Eudorus and the early Platonist interpretation of the Categories’, Laval Théologique et Philosophique 64: 583–95.Google Scholar

Terian, A. (1984) ‘A critical introduction to Philo’s dialogues’, in Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt, II.21.1, ed. Haase, W.. Berlin and New York: 272–94.Google Scholar

Terian, A. (1991) ‘Strange interpolations in the text of Philo. The case of Quaestiones in Exodum’, in Heirs of the Septuagint. Philo, Hellenistic Judaism and Early Christianity. Festschrift for Earle Hilgert, ed. Runia, D. T., Hay, D. M. and Winston, D.. Brown Judaic Studies 230 [= Studia Philonica Annual 3]. Atlanta: 320–7.Google Scholar

Terian, A. (unpublished), ‘From onologue to trialogue. De Providentia I–III and the culmination of Philo’s apology for the law’, A paper presented to the Society of Biblical Literature Annual Meeting, San Francisco 2011.Google Scholar

Theiler, W. (1965) ‘Philo von Alexandria und der Beginn des kaiserzeitlichen Platonismus’, in Parusia. Studien zur Philosophie Platons und zur Problemgeschichte des Platonismus, ed. Flasch, K.. Frankfurt: 199–218.Google Scholar

Thiel, D. (2006) Die Philosophie des Xenokrates im Kontext der Alten Akademie. Munich.Google Scholar

Thom, J. C. (ed.) (2005) Cleanthes’ Hymn to Zeus, text, tr., and comm. Studien und Texte zu Antike und Christentum 33. Tübingen.Google Scholar

Thom, J. C. (2012) ‘Popular philosophy in the Hellenistic-Roman world’, Early Christianity 3: 279–95.Google Scholar

Thom, J. C. (2015) ‘Paul and popular philosophy’, in Paul’s Graeco-Roman Context, ed. Breytenbach, C., Bibliotheca Ephemeridum Theologicarum Lovaniensium 277. Leuven, Paris and Bristol, CT: 47–74.Google Scholar

Thomassen, E. (2006) The Spiritual Seed. The Church of the ‘Valentinians’. Nag Hammadi and Manichaean Studies 60. Leiden.Google Scholar

Tieleman, T. (2003) Chrysippus’ On Affections. Reconstruction and Interpretation. Leiden.Google Scholar

Tobin, T. H. (1983) The Creation of Man. Philo and the History of Interpretation. Catholic Biblical Quarterly Monograph Series 14. Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Tobin, T. H. (1990) ‘The prologue of John and Hellenistic Jewish speculation’, Catholic Biblical Quarterly 52: 252–69.Google Scholar

Todd, R. B. (1976) Alexander of Aphrodisias. On Stoic Physics. Leiden.Google Scholar

Todd, R. B. (1977) ‘The author of the De Qualitatibus Incorporeis. If not Albinus, who?’, L’Antiquité Classique 46: 198–204.Google Scholar

Torri, P. ‘Quale dio per quale vita? Una interpretazione del τέλος platonico dell’ assimilazione a dio nel Didaskalikos di Alcinoo’, in press in Philologus.Google Scholar

Trapp, M. (2007) Philosophy in the Roman Empire. Ethics, Politics and Society. Aldershot.Google Scholar

Trizio, M. (2008) ‘Neoplatonic source-material in Eustratios of Nicaea’s Commentary on Book VI of the Nicomachean Ethics’, in Medieval Greek Commentaries on the Nicomachean Ethics, ed. Barber, C. and Jenkins, D.. Leiden: 71–110.Google Scholar

Tsouni, G. (2010) ‘Antiochus and Peripatetic Ethics’. Diss. Cambridge University.Google Scholar

Tsouni, G. (2012) ‘Antiochus on contemplation and the happy life’, in Sedley, (2012): 131–50.Google Scholar

Turner, J. D. (2001) Sethian Gnosticism and the Platonic Tradition. Bibliothèque Copte de Nag Hammadi, Études 6. Quebec.Google Scholar

Turner, J. D. (2007) ‘Sethian Gnosticism. A revised literary history’, in Actes du huitième congrès international d’études coptes. Paris, 28 juin-3 juillet 2004, ed. Bousson, N. and Goud’hors, A.. 2 vols. Orientalia Lovaniensia Analecta 163. Louvain: II, 899–908.Google Scholar

Urban, L. and Henry, P. (1979–80) ‘“Before Abraham was I am”. Does Philo explain John 8:56–58?’ Studia Philonica 6: 157–95.Google Scholar

Van Ackeren, M. (2011) Die Philosophie Marc Aurels, 2 vols. Berlin and Boston.Google Scholar

Van der Stockt, L. (2011) ‘Semper duo, numquam tres? Plutarch’s Popularphilosophie in On Having Many Friends’, in Virtues for the People. Aspects of Plutarchan Ethics, ed. Roskam, G. and Van der Stockt, L.. Plutarchea Hypomnemata 4. Leuven: 19–39.Google Scholar

Van Nuffelen, P. (2011) ‘Philo of Alexandria. Challenging Graeco-Roman culture’, in Van Nuffelen, P., Rethinking the Gods. Philosophical Readings of Religion in the Post-Hellenistic Period. Cambridge: 200–16.Google Scholar

Vegge, I. (2008) 2 Corinthians – a Letter about Reconciliation. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 2.239. Tübingen.Google Scholar

Vernant, J. P. (1991) Mortals and Immortals. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Wachsmuth, C. and Hense, O. (eds.) (1884–1912, repr. 1958) Ioannis Stobaei: Anthologium, 5 vols. Berlin.Google Scholar

Wahlde, U. C. (2010) The Gospel and Letters of John, 3 vols. Eerdmans Critical Commentary. Grand Rapids, MI.Google Scholar

Waldstein, M. and Wisse, F. (1995) The Apocryphon of John. Synopsis of Nag Hammadi Codices II,1; III,1; and IV,1 with BG 8502,2. Nag Hammadi and Manichaean Studies 33. Leiden.Google Scholar

Warren, J. (2015) ‘The bloom of youth’, Apeiron 48: 327–45.Google Scholar

Wasserman, E. J. (2008) The Death of the Soul in Romans 7. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 2.256. Tübingen.Google Scholar

Wasserman, E. J. (2012) ‘Paul beyond the Judaism/Hellenism divide? The case of Pauline anthropology in Romans 7 and 2 Cor 4–5’, in Christian Origins and Hellenistic Judaism. Social and Literary Contexts for the New Testament, ed. Porter, S. and Pitts, A.. Leiden: 259–79.Google Scholar