Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T01:47:24.894Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Habitat description and phenology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Jörg U. Ganzhorn
Affiliation:
Institute of Zoology and Zoological Museum, Germany
Joanna M. Setchell
Affiliation:
University of Surrey, Roehampton
Deborah J. Curtis
Affiliation:
University of Surrey, Roehampton
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Habitat characteristics represent the matrix for the evolution of morphological, physiological and behavioural adaptations and life history traits of animals. These include bottom-up factors (such as distribution and abundance of food) and top-down constraints (such as protection from predators). The role of different habitat components in the survival and reproduction of individuals is of prime interest and is relevant for evolutionary understanding as well as for primate conservation. So far, this has been studied by linking habitat characteristics with phenotypic traits of animals, assuming that these traits represent adaptation to a given habitat constraint. However, we should bear in mind that the characteristics we observe today may represent adaptations to constraints that acted in the past (the Epaminondas effect, named after the little boy who always did the right thing for the previous situation; or, in evolutionary terminology, animals are tracking fitness optima by trying to climb the sides of shifting adaptive peaks (Cody, 1974). However, testing hypotheses based on these ‘ghosts of past constraints’ has so far been impossible.

The present chapter focuses on the description of the vegetation of forest habitats as the biotic matrix for the evolution of life history traits.

BEFORE YOU START

Any statistical analysis requires quantitative measurements of habitat and animal characteristics. Most habitats are extremely complex and there are many features that can be measured, spending endless time and money, without measuring the right variable.

Type
Chapter
Information
Field and Laboratory Methods in Primatology
A Practical Guide
, pp. 40 - 56
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

APG (1998). An ordinal classification for the families of flowering plants. Ann. Miss. Bot. Gard. 85, 531–53CrossRef
Böhning-Gaese, K., Gaese, B. H. & Rabemanantsoa, S. B. (1999). Importance of primary and secondary seed dispersal in the Malagasy tree Commiphora guillaumini. Ecology 80, 821–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braun-Blanquet, J. (1967). Pflanzensoziologie, 3rd edition Wien: Springer-Verlag
Brower, J. E., Zar, J. H. & von Ende, C. N. (1990). Field and Laboratory Methods for General Ecology. Dubuque, IA: William C. Brown Publishers
Butynski, T. M. (1990). Comparative ecology of blue monkeys (Cercopithecus mitis) in high- and low-density subpopulations. Ecol. Monogr. 60, 1–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, C. A., Chapman, L. J., Wrangham, R., Hunt, K., Gebo, D. & Gardner, L. (1992). Estimators of fruit abundance of tropical trees. Biotropica 24, 527–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, C. A., Wrangham, R. & Chapman, L. J. (1994). Indices of habitat-wide fruit abundance in tropical forests. Biotropica 26, 160–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cody, M. L. (1974). Optimization in ecology. Science 183, 1156–64CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davies, A. G. (1987). The Gola Forest Reserves, Sierra Leone. Gland: IUCNx
Ganzhorn, J. U. (1989). Niche separation of the seven lemur species in the eastern rainforest of Madagascar. Oecologia 79, 279–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ganzhorn, J. U. (1993). Flexibility and constraints of Lepilemur ecology. In Lemur Social Systems and their Ecological Basis, ed. P. M. Kappeler & J. U. Ganzhorn, pp. 153–65. New York: Plenum PressCrossRef
Ganzhorn, J. U.(1995). Low level forest disturbance effects on primary production, leaf chemistry, and lemur populations. Ecology 76, 2084–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ganzhorn, J. U.(2002). Distribution of folivorous lemurs in relation to seasonally varying food resources: effects of qualitative and quantitative food characteristics. Oecologia 131, 427–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ganzhorn, J. U., Malcomber, S., Andrianantoanina, O. & Goodman, S. M. (1997). Habitat characteristics and lemur species richness in Madagascar. Biotropica 29, 331–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gautier, L., Chatelain, C. & Spichiger, R. (1994). Presentation of a relevé method for vegetation studies based on high resolution satellite imagery. In Proceedings of the IIIIth Plenary Meeting AETFAT, Malawi, vol. 2, ed. J. H. Seyani & A. C. Chikuni, pp. 1339–50
Gautier-Hion, A. & Michaloud, G. (1989). Are figs always keystone resources for tropical frugivorous vertebrates? A test in Gabon. Ecology 70, 1826–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gentry, A. (1993). A Field Guide to the Families and Genera of Woody Plants of Northwest South America. Washington, DC: Conservation International
Gentry, A.(1995). Diversity and floristic composition of neotropical dry forests. In Seasonally Dry Tropical Forests, ed. S. H. Bullock, H. A. Mooney & E. Medina, pp. 146–94. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef
Heymann, E. W. & Smith, A. C. (1999). When to feed on gums: temporal patterns of gummivory in wild tamarins, Saguinus mystax and Saguinus fuscicollis (Callitrichidae). Zoo Biol. 18, 459–713.0.CO;2-V>CrossRef
Hladik, A. (1980). The dry forest of the west coast of Madagascar: climate, phenology, and food available for prosimians. In Nocturnal Malagasy Primates, ed. P. Charles-Dominique, H. M. Cooper, A. Hladik, C. M. Hladik, E. Pages, G. F. Pariente, A. Petter-Rousseaux, J.-J. Petter & A. Schilling, pp. 3–40. New York: Academic PressCrossRef
Hladik, C. M. (1977). Field methods for processing food samples. In Primate Ecology, ed. T. H. Clutton-Brock, pp. 591–601. London: Academic PressCrossRef
Kay, R. F., Madden, R. H., Schaik, C. & Higdon, D. (1997). Primate species richness is determined by plant productivity: implications for conservation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., USA 94, 13023–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keller, R. (1996). Identification of Tropical Woody Plants in the Absence of Flowers and Fruits. Basel: Birkhäuser Verlag
Krebs, C. J. (1998). Ecological Methodology. Menlo Park, CA: Addison Wesley Longman
Leigh, E. G., Rand, A. S. & Windsor, D. M. (eds.). (1996). The Ecology of a Tropical Forest: Seasonal Rhythms and Long-term Changes. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press
Ludwig, J. A. & Reynolds, J. F. (1988). Statistical Ecology. New York: John Wiley & Sons
Messmer, N., Rakotomalaza, P. J. & Gautier, L. (2000). Structure and floristic composition of the Parc National de Marojejy, Madagascar. In A Floral and Faunal Inventory of the Parc National de Marojejy, Madagascar: With Reference to Elevational Variation, ed. S. M. Goodman, pp. 41–104. Chicago: Field Museum of Natural History
Oates, J. F., Whitesides, G. H., Davies, A. G., Waterman, P. G., Green, S. M., Dasilva, G. L. & Mole, S. (1990). Determinants of variation in tropical forest primate biomass: new evidence from West Africa. Ecology 71, 328–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, O. L & Miller, J. S. (2002). Global patterns of Plant Diversity: Alwyn H. Gentry's Forest Transect Data Set, Monographs in Systematic Botany no. 89. St Louis, MO: Missouri Botanical Garden Press
Schatz, G. E. (2001). Generic Tree Flora of Madagascar. Kew, St Louis, MO: Royal Botanical Garden and Missouri Botanical Garden
Schwarzkopf, L. & Rylands, A. B. (1989). Primate species richness in relation to habitat structure in Amazonian rainforest fragments. Biol. Cons. 48, 1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegel, S. & Castellan, N. J. (1988). Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill
Smith, A. P., Horning, N. & Moore, D. (1997). Regional biodiversity planning and lemur conservation with GIS in western Madagascar. Cons. Biol. 11, 498–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Southwood, T. R. E. & Henderson, P. A. (2000). Ecological Methods, 3rd edition Oxford: Blackwell Science
Stohlgren, T. & Chong, G. (1997). Assessment of biological diversity and long-term monitoring plan for the Lower Urubamba Region. In Biodiversity Assessment and Monitoring of the Lower Urubamba Region, Peru, vol. 1, SI/Monitoring and Assessment of Biodiversity Program, ed. F. Dallmeier & A. Alonso, pp. 41–4. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution
Struhsaker, T. T. (1997). Ecology of an African Rain Forest. Gainesville, FL: University Press of Florida
Terborgh, J. (1983). Five New World Primates (USA). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
van Schaik, C. P., Terborgh, J. W. & Wright, S. J. (1993). The phenology of tropical forests: adaptive significance and consequences for primary consumers. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 24, 353–77CrossRef
Warren, R. D. (1997). Habitat use and support preference of two free-ranging saltatory lemurs (Lepilemur edwardsi and Avahi occidentalis). J. Zool., Lond. 241, 325–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitmore, T. C. (1990). An Introduction to Tropical Rain Forests. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Whitten, A. J. (1982). A numerical analysis of tropical rain forest using floristic and structural data and its application to an analysis of gibbon ranging behaviour. J. Ecol. 70, 249–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, P. C. (1997). Behavioral and ecological comparisons of Neotropical and Malagasy primates. In New World Primates: Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior, ed. W. G. Kinzey, pp. 127–41. New York: Aldine de Gruiter
Wright, P. C. (1999). Lemur traits and Madagascar ecology: coping with an island environment. Yearbk Phys. Anthropol. 42, 31–723.0.CO;2-0>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kent, M. & Coker, P. (1992). Vegetation Description and Analysis. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press
Mueller-Dombois, D. & Ellenberg, H. (1974). Aims and Methods of Vegetation Ecology. New York: John Wiley & Sons
Underwood, A. J. (1997). Experiments in Ecology. Their Logical Design and Interpretation using Analysis of Variance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×