Termination of pregnancy

doi:10.1017/CBO9781107585843.019

Section 5 - Termination of pregnancy

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 April 2016

Edited by

Bidyut Kumar and

Zarko Alfirevic

Show author details

Bidyut Kumar: Affiliation:
Wrexham Maelor Hospital
Zarko Alfirevic: Affiliation:
University of Liverpool

Book contents

Get access

Type: Chapter
Information: Fetal Medicine , pp. 243 - 268

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107585843.019 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abortion Act 1967. London: HMSO; 1967. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1967/87/contents.Google Scholar

Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990. London: HMSO; 1990. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1990/37/contents.Google Scholar

Statham, H, Solomou, W, Green, J. Late termination of pregnancy: law, policy and decision making in four English fetal medicine units. BJOG 2006; 113: 1402–11.Google Scholar

Abortion Act 1967. London: HMSO; 1967. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/abortion-notification-forms-for-england-and-wales.Google Scholar

Abortion Act 1967. Section 3. London: HMSO; 1967. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1967/87/section/3.Google Scholar

Draper, E, Alfirevic, Z, Stacey, F, et al. for the EPICure Study Group. An investigation into the reporting and management of late terminations of pregnancy (between 22+0 and 26+6 weeks of gestation) within NHS Hospitals in England in 2006: the EPICure preterm cohort study. BJOG 2012; 119: 710–5.Google Scholar

R v Smith [1974]. 1 All ER 376, 1 WLR 1510, 58 Cr App Rep 106.Google Scholar

Care Quality Commission (CQC). Findings of termination of pregnancy inspections 2012. http://www.cqc.org.uk/media/findings-termination-pregnancy-inspections-published.Google Scholar

Department of Health. Guidance in relation to requirements of the Abortion Act 1967, May 2014. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/313459/20140509_-_Abortion_Guidance_Document.pdf.Google Scholar

Janaway v Salford Health Authority: All England Law Rep 1988 Dec1; [1988] 3: 1079–84.Google Scholar

Doogan and Wood v. NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde Health Board [2013] CSIH 36 P876/11. http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/2013/2013CSIH36.html.Google Scholar

General Medical Council. Personal beliefs and medical practice, 2013. http://www.gmc-uk.org/Personal_beliefs_and_medical_practice.pdf_51462245.pdf.Google Scholar

Royal College of Nursing. Termination of pregnancy, an RCN nursing framework, 2013. http://www.rcn.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/529654/Terminationofpregnancy_WEB.pdf.Google Scholar

Kelly v Kelly [1997]. ScotCS CSIH_2 (24 May 1997). http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1997/1997_SC_285.html.Google Scholar

Hone v Hansell [unrep, March 2001].Google Scholar

Paton v BPAS [1979] QB 276.Google Scholar

Paton v UK [1981] 3 EHRR 408.Google Scholar

Northern Ireland Department of Health, Social Services and Public Safety. The limited circumstances for a lawful termination of pregnancy in Northern Ireland. A guidance document, 2013. http://www.dhsspsni.gov.uk/guidance-limited-circumstances-termination-pregnancy-april-2013.pdf.Google Scholar

Northern Ireland Department of Health, Social Services and Public Safety. Written statement to the Assembly, 2012. http://www.dhsspsni.gov.uk/termination-statement.Google Scholar

Northern Ireland Statistics and Research Agency. Birth and Deaths Reports. www.nisra.gov.uk/demography/default.asp23.htm.Google Scholar

Lynn, F, McNeill, J, Alderdice, F. Current trends in antenatal screening services: results from a regional survey. Ulster Med J 2010; 79(1): 12–5.Google Scholar

Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). Termination of Pregnancy for Fetal Abnormality in England, Wales and Scotland. Working Party Report. London: RCOG, 1996.Google Scholar

Department of Health. Report on abortion statistics in England and Wales for 2012, July 2013. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/report-on-abortion-statistics-in-england-and-wales-for-2012.Google Scholar

Nuffield Council on Bioethics. Critical Care Decisions in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine: Ethical Issues. London: Nuffield Council on Bioethics, 2006. www.nuffieldbioethics.org/go/ourwork/neonatal/publication_406.html.Google Scholar

British Association of Perinatal Medicine. Palliative care (supportive and end of life care). A framework for clinical practice in perinatal medicine, 2010. http://www.bapm.org/publications/documents/guidelines/Palliative_Care_Report_final_%20Aug10.pdf.Google Scholar

Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health (RCPCH). Withholding or Withdrawing Life Sustaining Treatment in Children: A Framework for Practice, 2nd edn. London: RCPCH, 2004. [www.library.nhs.uk/GUIDELINESFINDER/ViewResource.aspx?resID=298393].Google Scholar

Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). Additional report from the RCOG Ethics Committee. Further issues relating to late abortion, fetal viability and registration of births and deaths. London. RCOG, 2001.Google Scholar

National Health Service Scotland. Information Services Division (ISD) Scotland Abortion Statistics 2012, May 2013. http://www.isdscotland.org/Health-Topics/Sexual-Health/Publications/2013-05-28/2013-05-28-Abortions-Summary.pdf?58079165221.Google Scholar

Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership UK. Confidential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health: Perinatal Mortality, 2009. www.hqip.org.uk/assets/NCAPOP-Library/CMACE-Reports/35.-March-2011-Perinatal-Mortality-2009.pdf.Google Scholar

National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE). Antenatal Care: Routine Care for the Healthy Pregnant Woman. NICE Clinical Guideline CG62. London: NICE, 2008 http://guidance.nice.org.uk/CG62.Google Scholar

Public Health England. The National Down Syndrome Cytogenetic Register for England and Wales. 2012 Annual Report, 2013. http://www.wolfson.qmul.ac.uk/current-projects/downs-syndrome-register#annual-report Google Scholar

Centre for Maternal and Child Enquiries (CMACE). Saving mothers’ lives. Reviewing maternal deaths to make motherhood safer: 2006–2008. BJOG 2011; 118 (Suppl. 1): 1–203.Google Scholar

References

Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). The Care of Women Requesting Induced Abortion. Evidence-based Clinical guideline No. 7. London: RCOG Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). Termination of Pregnancy for Fetal Abnormality in England, Scotland and Wales. Report of a Working Party. London: RCOG Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Kerns, J, Vanjani, R, Freedman, L, et al. Women’s decision making regarding choice of second trimester termination method for pregnancy complications. Int J Gynaecol Obst 2012; 116(3): 244–8.Google Scholar PubMed

Asplin, N, Wessel, H, Marions, L, et al. Pregnancy termination due to fetal anomaly: Women’s reactions, satisfaction and experiences of care. Midwifery 2014; 30(6): 620–7.Google Scholar

Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). Termination of Pregnancy for Fetal Abnormality in England, Wales and Scotland. Working Party Report. London: RCOG Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Wyldes, MP, Tonks, AM. Termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly: a population-based study 1995 to 2004. BJOG 2007; 114: 639–42.Google Scholar

Draper, E, Alfirevic, Z, Stacey, F, et al. for the EPICure Study Group. An investigation into the reporting and management of late terminations of pregnancy (between 22⁺⁰ and 26⁺⁶ weeks of gestation) within NHS Hospitals in England in 2006: the EPICure preterm cohort study. BJOG 2012; 119: 710–5.Google Scholar

Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). Fetal Awareness: Review of Research and Recommendations for Practice. Report of a Working Party. London: RCOG Press, 2010. http://www.rcog.org.uk/files/rcogcorp/RCOGFetalAwarenessWPR0610.pdf.Google Scholar

Graham, RH, Mason, K, Rankin, J, et al. The role of feticide in the context of late termination of pregnancy: a qualitative study of health professionals’ and parents’ views. Prenat Diagn 2009; 29: 875–81.Google Scholar

Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). Further issues relating to late abortion, fetal viability and registration of births and deaths. RCOG Statement. London: RCOG Press; 2001.Google Scholar

Pasquini, L, Pontello, V, Kumar, S. Intracardiac injection of potassium chloride as a method for feticide: experience from a single UK tertiary centre. BJOG 2008; 115: 528–31.Google Scholar

Bhide, A, Sairam, S, Hollis, B, et al. Comparison of feticide carried out by cordocentesis versus cardiac puncture. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002; 20: 230–2.Google Scholar

Molaei, M, Jones, HE, Weiselberg, T, et al. Effectiveness and safety of digoxin to induce fetal demise prior to second-trimester abortion. Contraception 2008; 77: 223–5.Google Scholar

Lyus, R, Robson, S, Parsons, J, et al. Second trimester abortion for fetal abnormality. BMJ 2013; 347: f4165.Google Scholar

Kelly, T, Suddes, J, Howel, D, et al. Comparing medical versus surgical termination of pregnancy at 13–20 weeks of gestation: a randomised controlled trial. BJOG 2010; 117: 1512–20.Google Scholar

Wildschut, H, Both, MI, Medema, S, et al. Medical methods for mid-trimester termination of pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011; (1): CD005216.Google Scholar

World Health Organization (WHO). WHO Task Force on Post-ovulatory Methods of Fertility Regulation. Termination of pregnancy with reduced doses of mifepristone. BMJ 1993; 307: 532–7.Google Scholar

World Health Organization (WHO). WHO Task Force on Post-ovulatory Methods of Fertility Regulation. Comparison of two doses of mifepristone in combination with misoprostol for early medical abortion: a randomised trial. BJOG 2000; 107: 524–30.Google Scholar

European Commission. Council Directive 65/65/EC on the approximation of provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action relating to medicinal products. Official Journal 1965; 22: 369–73. http://www.echamp.eu/fileadmin/user_upload/Regulation/Directive_65-65-EEC-Consolidated_Version.pdf.Google Scholar

World Health Organization. Safe Abortion: technical and policy guidance for health systems, 2nd edn, 2012.Google Scholar

Hamoda, H, Ashok, PW, Flett, GM, et al. Medical abortion at 64 to 91 days of gestation: a review of 483 consecutive cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 188: 1315–9.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Ashok, PW, Kidd, A, Flett, GM, et al. A randomized comparison of medical abortion and surgical vacuum aspiration at 10–13 weeks gestation. Hum Reprod 2002; 17: 92–8.Google Scholar

Webster, D, Penney, GC, Templeton, A. A comparison of 600 and 200 mg mifepristone prior to second trimester abortion with the prostaglandin misoprostol. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1996; 103: 706–9.Google Scholar

Bartley, J, Baird, DT. A randomised study of misoprostol and gemeprost in combination with mifepristone for induction of abortion in the second trimester of pregnancy. BJOG 2002; 109: 1290–4.Google Scholar

Gemzell-Danielsson, K, Lalitkumar, S. Second trimester medical abortion with mifepristone-misprostol and misoprostol alone: a review of methods and management. Reprod Health Matters 2008; 16(31): 162–72.Google Scholar

World Health Organization (WHO). WHO recommendations for Induction of Labour. Geneva: WHO, 2011.Google Scholar

Ashok, PW, Templeton, A, Wagaarachchi, PT, et al. Midtrimester medical termination of pregnancy: a review of 1002 consecutive cases. Contraception 2004; 69(1): 51–8.Google Scholar

Davis, VJ. Induced abortion guidelines, Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada clinical practice guidelines No. 184. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2008; 30(11): 1014–27.Google Scholar

Hammond, C. Recent advances in second-trimester abortion: an evidence-based review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 200(4): 347–56.Google Scholar

Berghella, V, Airoldi, J, O’Neill, AM, et al. Misoprostol for second trimester pregnancy termination in women with prior caesarean: a systematic review. BJOG 2009; 116(9): 1151–7.Google Scholar

Dodd, JM, Crowther, CA. Misoprostol versus cervagem for the induction of labour to terminate pregnancy in the second and third trimester: a systematic review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2006; 125(1): 3–8.Google Scholar

Güleç, UK, Urunsak, IF, Eser, E, et al. Misoprostol for midtrimester termination of pregnancy in women with 1 or more prior cesarean deliveries. Int J of Gynecol Obstet 2013; 120(1): 85–87.Google Scholar

Fawzy, M, Abdel-Hady el, S. Midtrimester abortion using vaginal misoprostol for women with three or more prior cesarean deliveries. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2010; 110(1): 50–2.Google Scholar

Gemzell-Danielsson, K, Ostlund, E. Termination of second trimester pregnancy with mifepristone and gemeprost. The clinical experience of 197 consecutive cases. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2000; 79(8): 702–6.Google Scholar

Jackson, E, Kapp, N. Pain control in first-trimester and second-trimester medical termination of pregnancy: a systematic review. Contraception 2011; 83: 116–26.Google Scholar

Fiala, C, Swahn, ML, Stephansson, O, et al. The effect of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on medical abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol at 13–22 weeks gestation. Hum Reprod 2005; 20: 3072–7.Google Scholar

Hamoda, H, Ashok, PW, Flett, GM, et al. Analgesia requirements and predictors of analgesia use for women undergoing medical abortion up to 22 weeks of gestation. BJOG 2004; 111(9): 996–1000.Google Scholar

Tuncalp, O, Gülmezoglu, AM, Souza, JP. Surgical procedures for evacuating incomplete miscarriage. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; 9: CD001993.Google Scholar

Kulier, R, Cheng, L, Fekih, A, et al. Surgical methods for first trimester termination of pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001; 4: CD002900.Google Scholar

Stubblefield, PG, Albrecht, BH, Koos, B, et al. A randomized study of 12 mm and 15.9 mm cannulas in midtrimester abortion by laminaria and vacuum curettage. Fertil Steril 1978; 29: 512–7.Google Scholar

Kapp, N, Lohr, PA, Ngo, TD, et al. Cervical preparation for first trimester surgical abortion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; 2: CD007207.Google Scholar PubMed

Newmann, SJ, Dalve-Endres, A, Diedrich, JT, et al. Cervical preparation for second trimester dilation and evacuation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; 8: CD007310.Google Scholar

Li, CF, Wong, CY, Chan, CP, et al. A study of co-treatment of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) with misoprostol for cervical priming before suction termination of first trimester pregnancy. Contraception 2003; 67: 101–5.Google Scholar

Niinimäki, M, Pouta, A, Bloigu, A, et al. Immediate complications after medical compared with surgical termination of pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 114: 795–804.Google Scholar

Grimes, DA, Schulz, KF. Morbidity and mortality from second-trimester abortions. J Reprod Med 1985; 30: 505–14.Google Scholar

Ashok, PW, Kidd, A, Flett, GM, et al. A randomized comparison of medical abortion and surgical vacuum aspiration at 10–13 weeks gestation. Hum Reprod 2002; 17: 92–8.Google Scholar

Neilson, JP, Gyte, GM, Hickey, M, et al. Medical treatments for incomplete miscarriage (less than 24 weeks). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; 1: CD007223.Google Scholar

Low, N, Mueller, M, Van Viet, HAAM, et al. Perioperative antibiotics to prevent infection after first-trimester abortion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 3: CD005217.Google Scholar

Ho, CS, Bhatnagar, J, Cohen, AL, et al. Undiagnosed cases of fatal Clostridium-associated toxic shock in Californian women of childbearing age. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 201: 459–7.Google Scholar

Kale, SG, Szigetvari, IA, Bartfai, GS. The frequency and management of uterine perforations during 1st-trimester abortions. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 161: 406–8.Google Scholar

Rowland Hogue, CJ, Terry, MPH, Boardman, LA, et al. Answering questions about long-term outcomes. In: Paul, M, Lichtenberg, ES, Borgatta, L, et al., (eds). Management of Unintended and Abnormal Pregnancy: Comprehensive Abortion Care. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009: 252–63.Google Scholar

References

Human Tissue Authority. The Sands perinatal post-mortem consent package, 2013. www.hta.gov.uk/licensingandinspections/sectorspecificinformation/postmortem/perinatalpostmortem/thesandsperinatalpostmortemconsentpackage.Google Scholar

Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). The Use of Anti-D Immunoglobulin for Rhesus D Prophylaxis. London: RCOG Press, 2011. http://www.rcog.org.uk/womens-health/clinical-guidance/use-anti-d-immunoglobulin-rh-prophylaxis-green-top-22.Google Scholar

Jabara, S, Barnhart, KT. Is Rh immune globulin needed in early first-trimester abortion? A review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 188: 623–7.Google Scholar

Spitz, AM, Lee, NC, Peterson, HB. Treatment for lactation suppression: little progress in one hundred years. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998; 179: 1485–90.Google Scholar

European Multicentre Study Group for Cabergoline in Lactation Inhibition. Single dose cabergoline versus bromocriptine in inhibition of puerperal lactation: randomised, double blind, multicentre study. BMJ 1991; 302: 1367–71.Google Scholar

Oladapo, OT, Fawole, B. Treatment for suppression of lactation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; (9): CD005937.Google Scholar

Kremer, JA, van der Heijden, PF, Schellekens, LA, et al. Postpartum return of pituitary and ovarian activity during lactation inhibition with the new dopamine agonist CV 205–502 and during normal lactation. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh) 1990; 122: 759–65.Google Scholar

Gaffield, ME, Kapp, N, Ravi, A. Use of combined oral contraceptives post abortion. Contraception 2009; 80: 355–62.Google Scholar

World Health Organization (WHO). Selected practice recommendations for contraceptive use, 2nd edn. Geneva: WHO, 2004. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2004/9241562846.pdf.Google Scholar

Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). Late Intrauterine Fetal Death and Stillbirth. Green-Top Guideline No. 55. London: RCOG Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Korenromp, MJ, Page-Christiaens, GC, van den Bout, J, et al. Adjustment to termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly: a longitudinal study in women at 4, 8, and 16 months. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 201(2): 160 e1–7.Google Scholar

Korenromp, MJ, Page-Christiaens, GC, van den Bout, J, et al. Long-term psychological consequences of pregnancy termination for fetal abnormality: a cross-sectional study. Prenat Diagn. 2005; 25(3): 253–60.Google Scholar

Royal College of Nursing (RCN). Sensitive disposal of fetal remains. London: RCN, 2007. http://www.rcn.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0020/78500/001248.pdf.Google Scholar

Human Tissue Authority (HTA). Code of Practice 5 – Disposal of human tissue: Disposal following pregnancy loss. London: HTA, 2009.Google Scholar

Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). Disposal following pregnancy loss before 24 weeks of gestation. Good Practice No. 5. London: RCOG Press, 2005. http://www.rcog.org.uk/womens-health/clinical-guidance/disposal-following-pregnancy-loss-24-weeks-gestation.Google Scholar

Stillbirth and Neonatal Death Society. Pregnancy Loss and the Death of a Baby: Guidelines for Professionals, 2007. http://www.uk-sands.org/professionals/resources-for-health-professionals/the-sands-guidelines.Google Scholar

Lafarge, C, Mitchell, K, Fox, P. Women’s experiences of coping with pregnancy termination for fetal abnormality. Qual Health Res 2013; 23(7): 924–36.Google Scholar

Statham, H, Solomou, W, Green, JM. When the Baby has an Abnormality: A Study of Parents’ Experiences. Cambridge: Centre for Family Research, University of Cambridge, 2001.Google Scholar

Book contents

Section 5 - Termination of pregnancy

Access options

References

References

References

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive