Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T06:33:39.990Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

27 - Obergefell v. Hodges, 135 S. Ct. 2584 (2015)

from Part II - The feminist judgments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2016

Erez Aloni
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor at Whittier Law School, where he teaches courses in contracts and domestic relations.
Carlos A. Ball
Affiliation:
Distinguished Professor and Judge Frederick Lacey Scholar at the Rutgers University Law School.
Kathryn M. Stanchi
Affiliation:
Temple University, School of Law
Linda L. Berger
Affiliation:
University of Nevada Las Vegas, School of Law
Bridget J. Crawford
Affiliation:
Pace University, School of Law
Get access

Summary

BACKGROUND

In Obergefell v. Hodges, decided in June 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court declared unconstitutional state laws in Ohio, Michigan, Kentucky, and Tennessee that defined marriage as a union between one man and one woman only. In effect, this landmark decision legalized same-sex marriage nationwide. The case marks the final stage in a long and contested political and legal struggle to remove such marriage bans.

The first attempts to secure marriage rights through the judicial system date back to the early 1970s, when five same-sex couples filed lawsuits challenging a denial of marriage licenses. Their lawsuits were denied. During the 1980s, the Lesbian Gay Bisexual and Transgender (LGBT) movement itself – mobilized by various legal and societal changes related to sexual relations, gender, and family – led a more organized campaign for legal recognition of same-sex relationships. Two events were particularly strong catalysts: the HIV/AIDS crisis and the “gayby-boom,” in which lesbian mothers slammed up against the legal system in trying to secure parental rights. At the time, however, the movement pursued marriage alternatives rather than the right to marry.

The marriage equality movement as we know it gained momentum after the Hawaii Supreme Court's 1993 decision in Baehr v. Lewin, the first in the United States that questioned the constitutionality of same-sex marriage bans. (Due to a state constitutional referendum, same-sex marriage did not become available in Hawaii.) The Baehr decision created a serious political backlash that led to passage of the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), a law that defined marriage, for federal purposes, as between a man and a woman only.

Despite such hostility, the marriage equality movement made progress, with Massachusetts, in 2003, becoming the first state to legalize same-sex marriage. Following Massachusetts, some states repealed their restrictions on same-sex marriage by either court decision (Iowa, Connecticut) or legislation (Vermont, New York). However, because of DOMA, couples could only enjoy state benefits attendant to marriage, not federal ones.

The tipping point was United States v. Windsor, where the U.S. Supreme Court invalidated section 3 of DOMA, ordering the federal government to recognize same-sex marriages performed in states that allow it. Following Windsor, marriage equality advocates successfully litigated in four federal circuit courts but lost in the Sixth Circuit. The U.S. Supreme Court took that case – which is Obergefell.

Type
Chapter
Information
Feminist Judgments
Rewritten Opinions of the United States Supreme Court
, pp. 527 - 546
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×