Book contents
- Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Criminal Law Opinions
- Feminist Judgments Series
- Advisory Panel for Feminist Judgments Series
- Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Criminal Law Opinions
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Advisory Panel for Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Criminal Law Opinions
- Notes on Contributors
- Introduction and Overview
- Part I Gendered Justice
- Part II Gender on Trial
- 9 Commentary on State v. Williams
- 10 Commentary on State v. Walden
- 11 Commentary on State v. Norman
- 12 Commentary on Whitner v. State
- 13 Commentary on United States v. Nwoye
- 14 Commentary on Erotic Services Provider Legal Education and Research Project v. Gascon
9 - Commentary on State v. Williams
from Part II - Gender on Trial
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 December 2022
- Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Criminal Law Opinions
- Feminist Judgments Series
- Advisory Panel for Feminist Judgments Series
- Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Criminal Law Opinions
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Advisory Panel for Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Criminal Law Opinions
- Notes on Contributors
- Introduction and Overview
- Part I Gendered Justice
- Part II Gender on Trial
- 9 Commentary on State v. Williams
- 10 Commentary on State v. Walden
- 11 Commentary on State v. Norman
- 12 Commentary on Whitner v. State
- 13 Commentary on United States v. Nwoye
- 14 Commentary on Erotic Services Provider Legal Education and Research Project v. Gascon
Summary
This case concerned the second-degree murder of a child by his mother. The trial court had denied the defendant’s request for the opportunity to present a cultural defense to the jury. She contended that her Chinese heritage and upbringing had impaired her state of mind such that she should not have been found guilty of murder. The court held that the trial court had erred in denying the defense. The opinion concerns the intersectional issues between race and gender in the criminal law setting.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Criminal Law Opinions , pp. 191 - 213Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022