Book contents
- Feminist Judgments
- Series page
- Advisory Panel for Feminist Judgments Series
- Feminist Judgments: Reproductive Justice Rewritten
- Copyright page
- Epigraph
- Contents
- Advisory Panel
- Notes on Contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Table of Cases
- Part I Introduction and Overview
- Part II The Feminist Judgments
- 1 Buck v. Bell, 274 U.S. 200 (1927)
- 2 Skinner v. Oklahoma, 316 U.S. 535 (1942)
- 3 Wyman v. James, 400 U.S. 309 (1971)
- 4 Maher v. Roe, 432 U.S. 464 (1977)
- 5 In Re Madyun, 114 Daily Wash. Law. Rptr. 2233 (D.C. Super. Ct., 1986)
- 6 Johnson v. Calvert, 5 Cal. 4th 84 (1993)
- 7 Ferguson v. City of Charleston, 532 U.S. 67 (2001)
- 8 State v. Oakley, 629 N.W.2d 200 (Wis. 2001)
- 9 Sojourner A. v. N.J. Dep’t of Human Servs., 177 N.J. 318 (2003)
- 10 K.M. v. E.G., 37 Cal. 4th 130 (2005)
- 11 Reber v. Reiss, 42 A.3d 1131 (2012)
- 12 Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl, 570 U.S. 637 (2013)
- 13 Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., 573 U.S. 682 (2014)
- 14 Young v. UPS, 135 S. Ct. 1338 (2015)
- 15 Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt, 136 S. Ct. 2292 (2016)
- Index
4 - Maher v. Roe, 432 U.S. 464 (1977)
from Part II - The Feminist Judgments
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 31 March 2020
Edited by
Book contents
- Feminist Judgments
- Series page
- Advisory Panel for Feminist Judgments Series
- Feminist Judgments: Reproductive Justice Rewritten
- Copyright page
- Epigraph
- Contents
- Advisory Panel
- Notes on Contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Table of Cases
- Part I Introduction and Overview
- Part II The Feminist Judgments
- 1 Buck v. Bell, 274 U.S. 200 (1927)
- 2 Skinner v. Oklahoma, 316 U.S. 535 (1942)
- 3 Wyman v. James, 400 U.S. 309 (1971)
- 4 Maher v. Roe, 432 U.S. 464 (1977)
- 5 In Re Madyun, 114 Daily Wash. Law. Rptr. 2233 (D.C. Super. Ct., 1986)
- 6 Johnson v. Calvert, 5 Cal. 4th 84 (1993)
- 7 Ferguson v. City of Charleston, 532 U.S. 67 (2001)
- 8 State v. Oakley, 629 N.W.2d 200 (Wis. 2001)
- 9 Sojourner A. v. N.J. Dep’t of Human Servs., 177 N.J. 318 (2003)
- 10 K.M. v. E.G., 37 Cal. 4th 130 (2005)
- 11 Reber v. Reiss, 42 A.3d 1131 (2012)
- 12 Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl, 570 U.S. 637 (2013)
- 13 Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., 573 U.S. 682 (2014)
- 14 Young v. UPS, 135 S. Ct. 1338 (2015)
- 15 Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt, 136 S. Ct. 2292 (2016)
- Index
Summary
In Maher v. Roe, the United States Supreme Court upheld a state’s regulation withholding public funding for abortion from poor women. Although the Court insisted that its decision signaled no retreat from Roe v. Wade, Maher’s devastating consequences for women who relied on public funding for reproductive health care and its curtailing effect on abortion rights jurisprudence tell another story.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Feminist Judgments: Reproductive Justice Rewritten , pp. 72 - 93Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020