Alexandrov, M., Kontsevich, M., Schwarz, A., and Zaboronsky, O. 1997. The geometry of the master equation and topological field theory. Internat. J. Modern Phys., 12(7), 1405–1429.Google Scholar

Atiyah, M. F., Hitchin, N. J., and Singer, I. M. 1978. Self-duality in four-dimensional Riemannian geometry. Proc. Roy. Soc. London Ser. A, 362(1711), 425–461.Google Scholar

Axelrod, S., and Singer, I. M. 1992. Chern-Simons perturbation theory. Pages 3–45 of: Proceedings of the XXth International Conference on Differential Geometric Methods in Theoretical Physics, Vol. 1, 2 (New York, 1991). World Scientific Publishing, River Edge, NJ.Google Scholar

Axelrod, S., and Singer, I. M. 1994. Chern-Simons perturbation theory. II. J. Differential Geom., 39(1), 173–213.Google Scholar

Baez, J. C. 1996. Four-dimensional BF theory as a topological quantum field theory. Lett. Math. Phys., 38(2), 129–143.Google Scholar

Baez, J. C., and Crans, A. S. 2004. Higher-dimensional algebra. VI. Lie 2-algebras. Theory Appl. Categ., 12, 492–538.Google Scholar

Baez, J. C., and Rogers, C. L. 2010. Categorifiedsymplectic geometry and the string Lie 2-algebra. Homology Homotopy Appl., 12(1), 221–236.Google Scholar

Bashkirov, D., and Voronov, A. A. 2017. The BV formalism for L_∞-algebras. J. HomotopyRelat. Struct., 12(2), 305–327.Google Scholar

Beem, C., Ben-Zvi, D., Bullimore, M., Dimofte, T., and Neitzke, A. 2020. Secondary products in supersymmetric field theory. Ann. Henri Poincaré, 21(4), 1235–1310.Google Scholar

Ben-Bassat, O., Brav, C., Bussi, V., and Joyce, D. 2015. A ‘Darboux theorem’ for shifted symplectic structures on derived Artin stacks, with applications. Geom. Topol., 19(3), 1287–1359.Google Scholar

Benini, M., Perin, M., and Schenkel, A. 2020. Model-independent comparison between factorization algebras and algebraic quantum field theory on Lorentzian manifolds. Comm. Math. Phys., 377(2), 971–997.Google Scholar

Benini, M., Schenkel, A., and Woike, L. 2019. Homotopy theory of algebraic quantum field theories. Lett. Math. Phys., 109(7), 1487–1532.Google Scholar

Berline, N., Getzler, E., and Vergne, M. 1992. Heat kernels and Dirac operators. Grundlehren der MathematischenWissenschaften [Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences], vol. 298. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar

Braun, C., and Lazarev, A. 2013. Homotopy BV algebras in Poisson geometry. Trans. Moscow Math. Soc., 217–227.Google Scholar

Brav, C., Bussi, V., and Joyce, D. 2019. A Darboux theorem for derived schemes with shifted symplectic structure. J. Amer. Math. Soc., 32(2), 399–443.Google Scholar

Calaque, D., Pantev, T., Toën, B., Vaquié, M., and Vezzosi, G. 2017. Shifted Poisson structures and deformation quantization. J. Topol., 10(2), 483–584.Google Scholar

Cattaneo, A. S., Cotta-Ramusino, P., Fucito, F., Martellini, M., Rinaldi, M., Tanzini, A., and Zeni, M. 1998. Four-dimensional Yang-Mills theory as a deformation of topological BF theory. Comm. Math. Phys., 197(3), 571–621.Google Scholar

Cattaneo, A. S., Felder, G., and Tomassini, L. 2002. Fedosov connections on jet bundles and deformation quantization. Pages 191–202 of: Deformation quantization (Strasbourg, 2001). IRMA Lectures in Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, vol. 1. deGruyter, Berlin.Google Scholar

Cattaneo, A. S., and Rossi, C. A. 2001. Higher-dimensional BF theories in the Batalin-Vilkovisky formalism: the BV action and generalized Wilson loops. Comm. Math. Phys., 221(3), 591–657.Google Scholar

Costello, K. n.d. M-theory in the Omega-background and 5-dimensional non-commutative gauge theory. Available at www.arxiv.org/abs/1610. 04144.Google Scholar

Costello, K. 2007. Renormalisation and the Batalin-Vilkovisky formalism. Available at www.arxiv.org/abs/0706.1533.Google Scholar

Costello, K. 2010. A geometric construction of the Witten genus, I. In: Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians (Hyderabad, 2010).Google Scholar

Costello, K. 2011a. A geometric construction of the Witten genus, II. Available at www.arxiv.org/abs/1112.0816.Google Scholar

Costello, K. 2011b. Renormalization and effective field theory. Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, vol. 170. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI.Google Scholar

Costello, K. 2013a. Notes on supersymmetric and holomorphic field theories in dimensions 2 and 4. Pure Appl. Math. Q., 9(1), 73–165.Google Scholar

Costello, K. 2013b. Supersymmetric gauge theory and the Yangian. Available at www.arxiv.org/abs/1303.2632.Google Scholar

Costello, K. 2017. Holography and Koszul duality: the example of the M2 brane. Available at www.arxiv.org/abs/1705.02500.Google Scholar

Costello, K., Witten, E., and Yamazaki, M. 2019. Gauge theory and integrability, I. Pages 17–151 of: Proceedings of the Seventh International Congress of Chinese Mathematicians, Vol. I. Advanced Lectures in Mathematics (ALM), vol. 43. International Press, Somerville, MA.Google Scholar

Eisenbud, D., and Harris, J. 2000. The geometry of schemes. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 197. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar

Elliott, C., Williams, B., and Yoo, P. 2018. Asymptotic freedom in the BV formalism. J. Geom. Phys., 123, 246–283.Google Scholar

Fantechi, B., Göttsche, L., Illusie, L., Kleiman, S. L., Nitsure, N., and Vistoli, A. 2005. Fundamental algebraic geometry: Grothendieck's FGA explained. Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, vol. 123. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI.Google Scholar

Fløystad, G. 2006. Koszul duality and equivalences of categories. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 358(6), 2373–2398.Google Scholar

Frenkel, E., and Ben-Zvi, D. 2004. Vertex algebras and algebraic curves. Second edn. Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, vol. 88. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI.Google Scholar

Gaiotto, D., and Oh, J. 2019. Aspects of -deformed M-theory. Available at www.arxiv.org/abs/1907.06495.Google Scholar

Getzler, E. 2009. Lie theory for nilpotent L_∞-algebras. Ann. of Math. (2), 170(1), 271–301.Google Scholar

Gilkey, P. B. 1995. Invariance theory, the heat equation, and the Atiyah-Singer index theorem. Second edn. Studies in Advanced Mathematics. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar

Gould, H. W., and Shonhiwa, T. 2008. A catalog of interesting Dirichlet series. Missouri J. Math. Sci., 20(1), 1–17.Google Scholar

Grady, R., and Gwilliam, O. 2015. L_∞ spaces and derived loop spaces. New York J. Math., 21, 231–272.Google Scholar

Grady, R. E., Li, Q., and Li, S. 2017. Batalin-Vilkovisky quantization and the algebraic index. Adv. Math., 317, 575–639.Google Scholar

Guay, N. 2007. Affine Yangians and deformed double current algebras in type A. Adv. Math., 211(2), 436–484.Google Scholar

Guay, N, and Yang, Y. 2017. On deformed double current algebras for simple Lie algebras. Math. Res. Lett., 24(5), 1307–1384.Google Scholar

Gwilliam, O., Gorbounov, V., and Williams, B. 2020. Chiral differential operators via quantization of the holomorphic σ -model. Astérisque, 419. Available at www.arxiv.org/abs/1610.09657.Google Scholar

Gwilliam, O., and Grady, R. 2014. One-dimensional Chern-Simons theory and the  genus. Algebr. Geom. Topol., 14(4), 2299–2377.Google Scholar

Gwilliam, O., and Haugseng, R. 2018. Linear Batalin-Vilkovisky quantization as a functor of ∞-categories. Selecta Math. (N.S.), 24(2), 1247–1313.Google Scholar

Gwilliam, O., and Williams, B. R. 2021. Higher Kac-Moody algebras and symmetries of holomorphic field theories. Adv. Theor. Math. Phys., 25(1).Google Scholar

Henneaux, M., and Teitelboim, C. 1992. Quantization of gauge systems. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Henriques, A. 2008. Integrating L_∞-algebras. Compos. Math., 144(4), 1017–1045.Google Scholar

Hernandez, D. 2009. Quantum toroidal algebras and their representations. Selecta Math. (N.S.), 14(3–4), 701–725.Google Scholar

Hinich, V. 2001. DG coalgebras as formal stacks. J. Pure Appl. Algebra, 162(2–3), 209–250.Google Scholar

Hohm, O., and Zwiebach, B. 2017. L_∞ algebras and field theory. Fortschr. Phys., 65(3–4), 1700014, 33.Google Scholar

Joyce, D. 2015. A classical model for derived critical loci. J. Differential Geom., 101(2), 289–367.Google Scholar

Jurčo, B., Macrelli, T., Raspollini, L., Sämann, C., and Wolf, M. 2019b. L_∞-algebras, the BV formalism, and classical fields. Fortschr. Phys., 67(8–9, Special issue: Proceedings of the LMS/EPSRC Durham Symposium on Higher Structures in M-Theory), 1910025, 17.Google Scholar

Jurčo, B., Raspollini, L., Sämann, C., and Wolf, M. 2019a. L_∞-algebras of classical field theories and the Batalin-Vilkovisky formalism. Fortschr. Phys., 67(7), 1900025, 60.Google Scholar

Kapranov, M., Kontsevich, M., and Soibelman, Y. 2016. Algebra of the infrared and secondary polytopes. Adv. Math., 300, 616–671.Google Scholar

Kapustin, A., and Witten, E. 2007. Electric-magnetic duality and the geometric Langlands program. Commun. Number Theory Phys., 1(1), 1–236.Google Scholar

Keller, B. 2006. A-infinity algebras, modules and functor categories. Pages 67–93 of: Trends in representation theory of algebras and related topics. Contemporary Mathematics, vol. 406. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI.Google Scholar

Knudsen, B. 2018. Higher enveloping algebras. Geom. Topol., 22(7), 4013–4066.Google Scholar

Kontsevich, M. 1993. Formal (non)commutative symplectic geometry. Pages 173–187 of: The Gelfand Mathematical Seminars, 1990–1992. Birkhäuser, Boston, MA.Google Scholar

Kontsevich, M. 1994. Feynman diagrams and low-dimensional topology. Pages 97–121 of: First European Congress of Mathematics, Vol. II (Paris, 1992). Progress in Mathematics, vol. 120. Birkhäuser, Basel.Google Scholar

Kontsevich, M. 2003. Deformation quantization of Poisson manifolds. Lett. Math. Phys., 66(3), 157–216.Google Scholar

Kontsevich, M, and Soibelman, Y. n.d. Deformation theory, volume I. Available at www.math.ksu.edu/∼soibel/.Google Scholar

Kontsevich, M., and Soibelman, Y. 2009. Notes on A_∞-algebras, A_∞-categories and non-commutative geometry. Pages 153–219 of: Homological mirror symmetry. Lecture Notes in Physics, vol. 757. Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar

Koszul, J.-L. 1985. Crochet de Schouten-Nijenhuis etcohomologie. Pages 257–271 of: ElieCartanet les mathematiquesd’aujourd’hui. Asterisque.Google Scholar

Li, Q., and Li, S. 2016. On the B-twisted topological sigma model and Calabi–Yau geometry. J. Differential Geom., 102(3), 409–484.Google Scholar

Li, S. 2012. Feynman graph integrals and almost modular forms. Commun. Number Theory Phys., 6(1), 129–157.Google Scholar

Lurie, J. n.d. Spectral Algebraic Geometry. Available at www.math.ias.edu/∼lurie/papers/SAG-rootfile.pdf.Google Scholar

Lurie, J. 2010. Moduli problems for ring spectra. Pages 1099–1125 of: Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians. Volume II. Hindustan Book Agency, New Delhi.Google Scholar

Manetti, M. 2009. Differential graded Lie algebras and formal deformation theory. Pages 785–810 of: Algebraic geometry—Seattle 2005. Part 2. Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics, vol. 80. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI.Google Scholar

Maulik, D., and Okounkov, A. 2019. Quantum groups and quantum cohomology. Astérisque, ix+209.Google Scholar

Melani, V., and Safronov, P. 2018a. Derived coisotropic structures I: affine case. Selecta Math. (N.S.), 24(4), 3061–3118.Google Scholar

Melani, V., and Safronov, P. 2018b. Derived coisotropic structures II: stacks and quantization. Selecta Math. (N.S.), 24(4), 3119–3173.Google Scholar

Nekrasov, N. 2005. Lectures on curved beta-gamma systems, pure spinors, and anomalies. Available at www.arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0511008.Google Scholar

Pantev, T., Toën, B., Vaquié, M., and Vezzosi, G. 2013. Shifted symplectic structures. Publ. Math. Inst. HautesÉtudes Sci., 117, 271–328.Google Scholar

Patodi, V. K. 1971. An analytic proof of Riemann-Roch-Hirzebruch theorem for Kaehler manifolds. J. Differential Geom., 5, 251–283.Google Scholar

Polishchuk, A., and Positselski, L. 2005. Quadratic algebras. University Lecture Series, vol. 37. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI.Google Scholar

Positselski, L. E. 1993. Nonhomogeneous quadratic duality and curvature. Funktsional. Anal. iPrilozhen., 27(3), 57–66, 96.Google Scholar

Pridham, J. P. 2010. Unifying derived deformation theories. Adv. Math., 224(3), 772–826.Google Scholar

Pridham, J. P. 2017. Shifted Poisson and symplectic structures on derived N-stacks. J. Topol., 10(1), 178–210.Google Scholar

Pridham, J. P. 2019. Deformation quantisation for (−1)-shifted symplectic structures and vanishing cycles. Algebr. Geom., 6(6), 747–779.Google Scholar

Quillen, D. 1969. Rational homotopy theory. Ann. of Math. (2), 90, 205–295.Google Scholar

Rabinovich, E. 2019. A mathematical analysis of the axial anomaly. Lett. Math. Phys., 109(5), 1055–1117.Google Scholar

Rabinovich, E. 2020. The Batalin-Vilkovisky formalism and the determinant line bundle. J. Geom. Phys., 156, 103792, 18.Google Scholar

Rejzner, K. 2016. Perturbative algebraic quantum field theory: An introduction for mathematicians. Mathematical Physics Studies. Springer, Cham.Google Scholar

Rozenblyum, N. 2015. Symplecticgroupoids and shifted Poisson structures. Talk at Warwick EPSRC Symposium on Derived Algebraic Geometry, with a Focus on Derived Symplectic Techniques. University of Warwick.Google Scholar

Saberi, I., and Williams, B. R. 2019. Superconformal algebras and holomorphic field theories. Available at www.arxiv.org/abs/1910.04120.Google Scholar

Saberi, I., and Williams, B. R. 2020. Twisted characters and holomorphic symmetries. Lett. Math. Phys., 110(10), 2779–2853.Google Scholar

Safronov, P. 2017. Poisson reduction as a coisotropic intersection. High. Struct., 1(1), 87–121.Google Scholar

Safronov, P. 2018. Braces and Poisson additivity. Compos. Math., 154(8), 1698–1745.Google Scholar

Scheimbauer, C. 2014. On fully extended topological field theories. Ph.D. thesis at ETH Zurich.Google Scholar

Schiffmann, O., and Vasserot, E. 2013. Cherednik algebras, W-algebras and the equivariantcohomology of the moduli space of instantons on A². Publ. Math. Inst. HautesÉtudes Sci., 118, 213–342.Google Scholar

Schwarz, A. 1993. Geometry of Batalin-Vilkovisky quantization. Comm. Math. Phys., 155(2), 249–260.Google Scholar

Tarkhanov, N. N. 1995. Complexes of differential operators. Mathematics and Its Applications, vol. 340. Kluwer Academic Publishers Group, Dordrecht. Translated from the 1990 Russian original by P. M. Gauthier and revised by the author.Google Scholar

Toën, B. 2009. Higher and derived stacks: a global overview. Pages 435–487 of: Algebraic geometry—Seattle 2005. Part 1. Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics, vol. 80. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI.Google Scholar

Toën, B. 2014. Derived algebraic geometry and deformation quantization. Pages 769–792 of: Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians—Seoul 2014. Vol. II. Kyung Moon Sa, Seoul.Google Scholar

Vafa, C., and Witten, E. 1994. A strong coupling test of S-duality. Nuclear Phys. B, 431(1–2), 3–77.Google Scholar

Vezzosi, G. 2020. Basic structures on derived critical loci. Differential Geom. Appl., 71, 101635, 11.Google Scholar

Williams, B. 2017. The Virasoro vertex algebra and factorization algebras on Riemann surfaces. Lett. Math. Phys., 107(12), 2189–2237.Google Scholar

Williams, B. R. 2020. Renormalization for holomorphic field theories. Comm. Math. Phys., 374(3), 1693–1742.Google Scholar

Witten, E. 2007. Two-dimensional models with (0,2)supersymmetry: perturbative aspects. Adv. Theor. Math. Phys., 11(1), 1–63.Google Scholar