Aims

The aim of this chapter is to discuss aspects of developing and using an RDM policy.

Writing a policy

A policy is a written statement of general principles that guides activities and decision making on a particular issue across an organisation. Going through the process of bringing together key stakeholders (or their representatives) to agree on a common stance lays the essential foundation for a co-ordinated response to an issue. The very process of agreeing a policy helps solidify the issue, co-ordinate views on how it should be understood and clarify the stance of the institution.

Having the written policy in place motivates and aligns action, and reduces misunderstanding. At its heart is a definition of roles and responsibilities for key stakeholders. It is the mandate for any services the institution offers.

Developing a policy

An internal policy discussion to make a policy establishes that RDM is a recognised concern for the institution. Indeed, simply establishing that there is a need for a policy may be the first battle. As we saw in Chapter 6, some responses to a wicked challenge could be that ‘there is no issue’ or that ‘it is adequately covered by existing policy or good practice’. Bringing key stakeholders together at a high level enables the institution to understand the full ramifications of the issue.

Because RDM touches on researchers at different levels and a number of professional support services there is a particular need to clarify roles.

It might be that writing the policy is the first action of an institution to respond to RDM; but it might be that pilot services need to be developed to prove the nature of the need.

Researching the policy is likely to involve data gathering in six areas: