Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-l4dxg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-18T15:28:26.575Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Individuals, settings, and acts of crime: situational mechanisms and the explanation of crime

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2009

By
Per-olof H. Wikström
Edited by
Per-Olof H. Wikström  and
Robert J. Sampson
Per-olof H. Wikström
Affiliation:
Professor University of Cambridge
Per-Olof H. Wikström
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Robert J. Sampson
Affiliation:
Harvard University, Massachusetts
Get access

Summary

The questions, “Why do people commit crime?” and “What can we do about it?” are central to any society. The answers to these questions require a basic understanding of what causes crime. I submit that criminological theory, by and large, has not been able to fully address the problems of causation and explanation. I argue that a major reason for this is that criminological theory generally suffers from a lack of a theory of action, a poor integration of levels of explanation and an unclear definition of crime (Wikström, 2004).

Without a clear conception of

  1. what crime is (what the theory should explain),

  2. what moves people to commit acts of crime (a theory of action), and

  3. how individual characteristics and experiences and environmental features interact in this process (integration of levels of explanation),

we cannot fully address the causes of crime. Moreover, without addressing these points in depth we lack the necessary theoretical foundation to evaluate fully the role of individual development and change (Wikström, 2005) and the role of systemic factors and their changes over time (Wikström & Sampson, 2003) in the explanation of crime.

Crimes are acts of moral rule-breaking. To explain crime is to explain why individuals break moral rules defined as crime in law. Crimes are acts committed by individuals. To explain acts of crime is to explain what moves individuals to break moral rules defined in law.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Explanation of Crime
Context, Mechanisms and Development
 , pp. 61 - 107
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agnew, R. (2005). Why Do Criminals Offend? A General Theory of Crime and Delinquency. Los Angeles: Roxbury.Google Scholar
Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics. Translated by Ostwald, Martin (1999). Library of Liberal Arts. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Bernstein, R. J. (1999). Praxis and Action. Contemporary Philosophies of Human Activity. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Blum, L. A. (1994). Moral Perception and Particularity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braithwaite, J. (1989). Crime, Shame and Reintegration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brantingham, P. J. & Brantingham, P. L. (1993). “Environment, routine and situation. Toward a pattern theory of crime.” In Clarke, R. V. & Felson, M. (eds.), Routine Activity and Rational Choice. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
Bunge, M. (1999). The Sociology–Philosophy Connection. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
Bursik, R. J. & Grasmick, H. G. (1993). Neighborhoods and Crime. New York: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Carver, C. S. & Scheier, M. F. (1998). On The Self-Regulation of Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, D. (1980). Essays on Actions and Events. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Davidson, D. (2004). Problems of Rationality. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewey, J. (2002). Human Nature and Conduct. Amherst, MA: Prometheus.Google Scholar
Dretske, F. (2000). Perception, Knowledge and Belief. Selected Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, J. (1999). Alchemies of the Mind. Rationality and the Emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .Google Scholar
Farrington, D. P. (1992), “Explaining the beginning, progress and ending of antisocial behavior from birth to adulthood.” In McCord, J. (ed.), Facts, Frameworks, and Forecasts: Advances in Criminological Theory, vol. III. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
Farrington, D. P.(1996). “The explanation and prevention of youthful offending.” In Hawkins, J. D. (ed.), Delinquency and Crime. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .Google Scholar
Farrington, D. P.(2000). “Explaining and preventing crime: the globalization of knowledge – The American Society of Criminology 1999 Presidential Address.” Criminology 38(1): 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forgas, J. P. & Laham, S. M. (2005). “The interaction between affect and motivation in social judgement and behavior.” In Forgas, J. P., Williams, K. D., & Laham, S. M. (eds.), Social Motivation. Conscious and Unconscious Processes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .Google Scholar
Gottfredson, D. C. & Hirschi, T. (1990). A General Theory of Crime. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Hirschi, T. (1986). “On the compatability of rational choice and control theories of crime.” In Cornish, D. B. & Clarke, R. V. (eds.), The Reasoning Criminal. New York: Springer Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holland, P. W. (1986). “Statistics and causal inference.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 81: 945–960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D. (2002). “Maps of bounded rationality: a perspective on intuitive judgement and choice.” Nobel Prize Lecture, Stockholm, December 8.
Maund, B. (2003). Perception. Montreal and Kingston: McGill–Queen's University Press.Google Scholar
Mele, A. R. (2001). Autonomous Agents. From Self-Control to Autonomy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Shaughnessy, B. (1997). “Trying (as the mental ‘pineal gland’).” In Mele, A. R. (ed.), The Philosophy of Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Salmon, W. C. (1998). Causality and Explanation. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sampson, R. J. & Groves, W. B. (1989). “Community structure and crime: testing social disorganization theory.” American Journal of Sociology 94: 774–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schick, F. (1991). Understanding Action. An Essay on Reasons. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schick, F.(1997). Making Choices. A Recasting of Decision Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .Google Scholar
Searle, J. R. (1983). Intentionality. An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, J. R.(2001). Rationality in Action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wright, H. G. (1971). Understanding and Explanation. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Wood, W. & Quinn J. M. (2005). “Habits and the structure of motivation in everyday life.” In Forgas, J. P., Williams, K. D., & Laham, S. M. (eds.), Social Motivation. Conscious and Unconscious Processes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .Google Scholar
Wikström, P.-O. H. (2004). “Crime as alternative: towards a cross-level situational action theory of crime causation.” In McCord, J. (ed.), Beyond Empiricism: Institutions and Intentions in the Study of Crime. Advances in Criminological Theory 13. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
Wikström, P.-O. H.(2005). “The social origins of pathways in crime: towards a developmental ecological action theory of crime involvement and its changes.” In Farrington, D. P. (ed.), Integrated Developmental and Life Course Theories of Offending. Advances in Criminological Theory 14. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
Wikström, P.-O. H.(2006). “Deterrence and deterrence experiences: preventing crime through the threat of punishment.” In Shoham, S. G. (ed.), International Penology Textbook.Eastbourne: Sussex Academic Press.Google Scholar
Wikström, P.-O. & Sampson, R. J. (2003). “Social mechanisms of community influences on crime and pathways in criminality.” In Lahey, B. B., Moffitt, T. E., & Caspi, A. (eds.), Causes of Conduct Disorder and Serious Juvenile Delinquency. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Wikström, P.-O. & Treiber, K. (2006). “The role of self-control in crime causation: beyond Gottfredson and Hirschi's General Theory of Crime.” Unpublished paper.
Wilson, J. Q. & Herrnstein, R. J. (1985). Crime and Human Nature. New York: Touchstone Books.Google Scholar
Wrong, D. H. (1994). The Problem of Order. What Unites and Divides Society?New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×