Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-669899f699-7xsfk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-28T20:26:04.984Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Altering Authoritarianism: Institutional Complexity and Autocratic Agency in Indonesia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

By
Dan Slater
Edited by
James Mahoney  and
Kathleen Thelen
James Mahoney
Affiliation:
Northwestern University, Illinois
Kathleen Thelen
Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Get access

Summary

How Authoritarian Institutions Change

Authoritarianism is rapidly moving from political science's margins to its mainstream. Lisa Wedeen's (1999, 26) observation that there were, “oddly, few recent writings on authoritarianism in comparative politics” rang true a decade ago – but no longer. A growing literature has established that dictatorships are as diverse as democracies, and that this diversity largely rests in these regimes' institutional differences. Contrary to popular images of dictatorships as regimes in which political arrangements and practices constantly shift at the whim of arbitrary autocrats, authoritarian regimes organize politics in ways that can prove surprisingly enduring. No less than in democracies, the orderliness of politics in authoritarian settings is best explained by the robustness of political institutions.

Yet we still know very little about how institutions evolve within durable authoritarian regimes over time. Through a theoretically motivated analysis of Indonesia's authoritarian New Order (1966–1998), this chapter develops a framework for apprehending and explaining incremental institutional shifts under dictatorship. Ostensibly a model of long-term stability, the Suharto regime in fact experienced a gradual but significant transformation of its core institutional features. What started as a system of oligarchic military rule evolved into a highly personalized regime, backed in nearly equal measure by military and civilian organizations.

Explaining why Indonesian authoritarianism underwent such a considerable transformation, while so many authoritarian regimes do not, demands attention to the causal role of institutional complexity in foiling path dependence and expanding opportunities for agentive action.

Type
Chapter
Information
Explaining Institutional Change
Ambiguity, Agency, and Power
 , pp. 132 - 167
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Anderson, Benedict. 1978. “Last Days of Indonesia's Suharto?” Southeast Asia Chronicle 63 (July-August): 2–17.Google Scholar
Anderson, Benedict R. O'G. 1983. “Old State, New Society: Indonesia's New Order in Comparative Historical Perspective.” Journal of Asian Studies 42 (3) (May): 477–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Benedict R. O'G. 1999. “Indonesian Nationalism Today and in the Future.” Indonesia 67 (April), pp. 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aspinall, Edward. 2005. Opposing Suharto: Compromise, Resistance, and Regime Change in Indonesia. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Brownlee, Jason. 2007. Authoritarianism in an Age of Democratization. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chehabi, H. E., and Linz, Juan J., eds. 1998. Sultanistic Regimes. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Clemens, Elisabeth S., and Cook, James M.. 1999. “Politics and Institutionalism: Explaining Durability and Change.” Annual Review of Sociology 25:441–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crouch, Harold. 1978. The Army and Politics in Indonesia. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Gandhi, Jennifer, and Przeworski, Adam. 2007. “Authoritarian Institutions and the Survival of Autocrats.” Comparative Political Studies 40 (11) (November): 1279–1301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geddes, Barbara. 1999a. “Authoritarian Breakdown: Empirical Test of a Game Theoretic Argument.” Paper presented at the annual meetings of the American Political Science Association, Atlanta.
Geddes, Barbara. 1999b. “What Do We Know About Democratization After Twenty Years?” Annual Review of Political Science 2:115–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadenius, Axel, and Teorell, Jan. 2007. “Pathways from Authoritarianism.” Journal of Democracy 18 (1) (January): 143–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honna, Jun. 2003. Military Politics and Democratization in Indonesia. New York: Routledge Curzon.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. 1968. Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. 1991. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Kasza, Gregory J. 1995. The Conscription Society: Administered Mass Organizations. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Kerkvliet, Benedict J. Tria. 2005. The Power of Everyday Politics: How Vietnamese Peasants Transformed National Policy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Liddle, R. William. 1996. “Indonesia: Suharto's Tightening Grip.” Journal of Democracy 7 (4) (October): 58–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liddle, R. William. 1999. “Indonesia's Democratic Opening.” Government and Opposition 34 (1) (January): 94–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin, and Rokkan, Stein. 1990 [1967]. “Cleavage Structures, Party Systems, and Voter Alignments.” In The West European Party System, ed. Mair, Peter, 91–138. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, Andrew. 2001. “Institutions and Investors: The Politics of the Economic Crisis in Southeast Asia.” International Organization 55 (1) (Winter): 81–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beatriz, Magaloni.. 2006. Voting for Autocracy: Hegemonic Party Survival and its Demise in Mexico. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mann, Michael. 1988. States, War and Capitalism: Studies in Political Sociology. Cambridge: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Migdal, Joel S. 2001. State in Society: Studying How States and Societies Transform and Constitute One Another. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, Douglass C. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Padgett, John F., and Ansell, Christopher K.. 1993. “Robust Action and the Rise of the Medici, 1400–1434.” American Journal of Sociology 98 (6) (May): 1259–1319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Robert. 1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ramage, Douglas E. 1995. Politics in Indonesia: Democracy, Islam and the Ideology of Tolerance. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robison, Richard. 1986. Indonesia: The Rise of Capital. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Robison, Richard, and Hadiz, Vedi R.. 2004. Reorganizing Power in Indonesia: The Politics of Oligarchy in an Age of Markets. London: Routledge Curzon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwarz, Adam. 1994. A Nation in Waiting: Indonesia in the 1990s. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Sheingate, Adam D. 2003. “Political Entrepreneurship, Institutional Change, and American Political Development.” Studies in American Political Development 17 (Fall): 185–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sidel, John T. 1998. “Macet Total: Logics of Circulation and Accumulation in the Demise of Indonesia's New Order.” Indonesia 66 (October): 159–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sidel, John T. 2006. Riots, Pogroms, and Jihad: Religious Violence in Indonesia. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Slater, Dan. 2003. “Iron Cage in an Iron Fist: Authoritarian Institutions and the Personalization of Power in Malaysia.” Comparative Politics 36 (1) (October): 81–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slater, Dan. 2004. “Indonesia's Accountability Trap: Party Cartels and Presidential Power after Democratic Transition.” Indonesia 78 (October): 61–92.Google Scholar
Slater, Dan. 2005. “Ordering Power: Contentious Politics, State-Building, and Authoritarian Durability in Southeast Asia.” PhD diss., Emory University.
Slater, Dan, and Simmons, Erica. Forthcoming. “Informative Regress: Critical Antecedents in Comparative Politics.” Comparative Political Studies.
Smith, Benjamin. 2007. Hard Times in the Lands of Plenty: Oil Politics in Iran and Indonesia. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Snyder, Richard. 1992. “Explaining Transitions from Neopatrimonial Dictatorships.” Comparative Politics 24 (4) (July): 379–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suryadinata, Leo. 1989. Military Ascendancy and Political Culture: A Study of Indonesia's Golkar. Southeast Asia Series, No. 85. Athens: Ohio University Monographs in International Studies.Google Scholar
Thelen, Kathleen. 2004. How Institutions Evolve: The Political Economy of Skills in Germany, Britain, the United States, and Japan. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsai, Kellee S. 2006. “Adaptive Informal Institutions and Institutional Change in China.” World Politics 59 (October): 116–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wedeen, Lisa. 1999. Ambiguities of Domination: Politics, Rhetoric, and Symbols in Contemporary Syria. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Winters, Jeffrey A. 1996. Power in Motion: Capital Mobility and the Indonesian State. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×