Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T16:13:25.576Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Molecular Advances in Lorisid Taxonomy and Phylogeny

from Part I - Evolution, Morphology and the Fossil Record

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 February 2020

K. A. I. Nekaris
Affiliation:
Oxford Brookes University
Anne M. Burrows
Affiliation:
Duquesne University, Pittsburgh
Get access

Summary

Lorises (family Lorisidae) are primates of the suborder Strepsirrhini. They belong to the infraorder Lorisiformes, together with their sister group, the Galagidae – galagos from sub-Saharan Africa. The systematics of the family Lorisidae have been long debated. Currently two subfamilies are recognised: Perodicticinae, including the two African genera Arctocebus (angwantibos) and Perodicticus (pottos), and Lorisinae, including the two Asian genera Loris (slender lorises) and Nycticebus (slow lorises) (Mittermeier et al., 2013; Rasmussen and Nekaris, 1998; Rowe and Myers, 2016) (1971) based on a series of craniodental features, and, more recently, supported by a cladistic analysis by Rasmussen and Nekaris (1998). Simpson (1967), however, identified several similarities between the two robust forms, Nycticebus and Perodicticus, and the two small-bodied, slender forms, Loris and Arctocebus. A cladistic analysis on craniodental data by Schwartz and Tattersall (1985) supported these two reciprocal monophyletic clades, but other morphological studies failed to identify a clade including both Perodicticus and Nycticebus (Masters and Brothers, 2002). To further complicate the taxonomy of this primate group, karyological studies conducted in the 1970s identified two alternative groups based on the number of chromosomes: Perodicticus and Loris share a diploid number of 2n = 62, while Arctocebus and Nycticebus exhibit a diploid number of 2n = 52 (although some populations of Nycticebus have 2n = 50) (de Boer, 1973; Masters et al., 2005).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×