Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T15:07:26.635Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Correlation and Causation

The “Bradford Hill Criteria” in Epidemiological, Legal, and Epistemological Perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2014

Susan Haack
Affiliation:
University of Miami
Get access

Summary

“So the litigation is used to shock the market?”

“Yes, and, of course, to compensate the victims. I don’t want tumors in my bladder, benign or malignant. Most jurors would feel the same way. Here’s the scenario: You put together a group of fifty or so plaintiffs, and file a big lawsuit on behalf of all Dyloft patients. At precisely the same time you launch a series of television ads soliciting more cases. You hit fast and hard, and you’ll get thousands of cases. The ads run coast to coast–quickie ads that’ll scare folks and make them dial your toll-free number right here in D.C., where you have a warehouse full of paralegals answering the phones and doing the grunt work. It’s gonna cost you some money, but if you get, say, five thousand cases, and you settle them for twenty thousand bucks each, that’s one hundred million dollars. Your cut is one third.”

“That’s outrageous!”

“No, … that’s mass tort litigation at its finest….”

–John Grisham

THE BETTER PART OF VALOR

Of course, this cynical conversation (from John Grisham’s novel The King of Torts) is fiction, not fact; still, it comes close enough to reality to bring an old proverb to mind. “Discretion is the better part of valor,” I reminded myself when, shortly after cheerfully accepting an invitation to speak at a workshop on “proof of causation in mass torts,” I realized I’d bitten off more than I could chew. For the fact is that mass torts–where large numbers of plaintiffs allege the same or closely similar injuries caused by the same defendant or group of defendants–raise far too many issues, legal, historical, and philosophical, for me to handle in one short paper (or even, I suspect, in one short lifetime!).

Type
Chapter
Information
Evidence Matters
Science, Proof, and Truth in the Law
, pp. 239 - 263
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×