We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
from TYPES OF EVIDENCE IN CIVIL LITIGATION
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 December 2017
Introduction
While the court is the ultimate finder of facts, a case may involve such highly technical issues that the court is unable to discharge its fact-finding function unless qualified persons assist in the process. As the learned Hong Kong district judge in Chan Shu Wing v. Link Management Ltd said: ‘Expert evidence is relevant if it will assist the court to resolve one or more relevant issues in dispute in the cause or matter and the issue is not one which the court can come to an informed decision without such expert evidence.’
The Hong Kong expert evidence regime in the past was highly adversarial. It was not uncommon that experts were instructed as ‘hired guns’. Instead of assisting the court to find the truth, adversarial experts acted more like advocates than witnesses. Part A of this contribution seeks to expound the procedural framework for the use of expert evidence in civil lawsuits, highlighting those changes made pursuant to the Civil Justice Reform to tackle the adversarial excesses in the system. Part B of this contribution explores expert evidence within the context of personal injury litigation in Hong Kong (which is governed under a set of specialist rules). Given the nature of personal injury disputes, the use of expert evidence is essential in the fact-finding process. The way expert evidence is deployed and managed under the specialist rules in personal injury litigation provides invaluable insight for further reform in the general procedural regime.
Part A: An overview of the expert evidence regime after the Civil Justice Reform in Hong Kong
The Role of the Expert in Civil Litigation
The role of the expert in civil litigation is clear under the law. An expert witness, in assisting the court, should give independent and unbiased opinions on matters within his own expertise. It is not the function of the expert witness to usurp the role of the court in the fact-finding process or to assume the role of an advocate. By definition, expert witnesses are authorities in specialist areas where no layman (including the judge) is capable of navigating by himself.
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.
