Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T02:07:31.516Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - Prose processing in adulthood: The text, the reader, and the task

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2013

Leonard W. Poon
Affiliation:
University of Georgia
David C. Rubin
Affiliation:
Duke University, North Carolina
Barbara A. Wilson
Affiliation:
University of Southampton
Get access

Summary

During the last five years, a substantial increase has occurred in the number of studies investigating aging effects in processing prose. As noted by Hartley in Chapter 11, many recent studies have reported age-related differences in quantity and quality of recall, whereas others have found no differences. In attempts to understand these discrepancies, analyses of this literature (Hultsch & Dixon, 1984; Meyer & Rice, 1983a) have been cast in terms of an interactional scheme among text, learner, and task variables (Figure 12.1). Because these variables interact in the comprehension process, it is impossible to discuss them adequately in isolation. However, this chapter emphasizes text variables, whereas Chapter 11 emphasized learner variables. Before examining text variables, we shall discuss learner and task variables, because their consideration is critical in understanding discrepancies in the literature on aging and prose learning.

Learner variables

Education and vocabulary

In considering the learner variables of education and vocabulary as partially responsible for the contradictory aging effects in prose learning, we are considering the long-standing problem in aging research of how to make old and younger age groups equivalent on cultural variables in cross-sectional studies (Birren & Morrison, 1961; Botwinick, 1978; Krauss, 1980). If studies examine only old adults with college degrees, their findings may not hold for the majority of old adults, who lack these degrees. In addition, degrees from various institutions and generations differ in educational value.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×