Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T13:05:00.822Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - The responsibility to protect and the war in Libya

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2014

Tzvetan Todorov
Affiliation:
Centre National de la Recherche Scientii que, Paris
Kathleen A. Johnson
Affiliation:
Freelance translator and editor
Don E. Scheid
Affiliation:
Winona State University, Minnesota
Get access

Summary

A new chapter in the history of international relations was inaugurated in 1999 when NATO military forces intervened in Yugoslavia to defend ethnic Albanians in the province of Kosovo, over the objections of Yugoslavia. It is no coincidence that the intervention occurred after the end of the Cold War; the Soviet Union no longer existed, and Russia was not ready for a confrontation. The Western nations that initiated the intervention had not obtained a formal decision from any international organization, like the United Nations – which, in any event, does not have its own military branch. This intervention was founded on a doctrine formulated a few years earlier. At the outset (1988), this was a simple demand to be able to provide humanitarian assistance to populations in distress; but it was progressively transformed (1991) into a proclamation of the right to intervene militarily in a country in crisis. The revelation of the Rwandan genocide (1994) seemed to argue in its favor, and since that time people have spoken of a “right of intervention.” Subscribing to this doctrine amounts to claiming that if human-rights violations occur in a country, then other countries around the world have the right to intervene through force to protect the victims and to prevent the aggressors from acting.

In Yugoslavia, the application of these principles revealed a number of problems inherent in the doctrine. Some concern doubts about information: Each of the two opposing forces has an interest in inflating the number of its victims and in concealing its own attacks (the manipulation of data is a shared temptation). In this regard, the Albanian minority was more effective than the Serbian majority; they succeeded in convincing American diplomats and NATO that they were the main victims of the violence (it is also possible that the choice was made even before the manipulation of information began). A second problem stems from the necessarily selective application of the principle. Human-rights violations are, unfortunately, quite numerous, and intervening everywhere is impossible; so one tends to spare political friends and to unleash forces against those who are pursuing a policy contrary to one’s own interests. As a result, the impartiality of the choice is jeopardized. A third problem arises from the very form of the interference, namely, a war with its inevitable consequences: bombings, destruction of the country and its inhabitants, countless sorrows.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Nohrstedt, Stig A., Kaitatzi-Whitlock, Sophia, Ottosen, Rune, and Riegert, Kristina, “From the Persian Gulf to Kosovo – War Journalism and Propaganda,” European Journal of Communication, 15, 3(2000), 383–404Google Scholar
Brown, Chris, “Selective Humanitarianism: in Defense of Inconsistency,” in Deen K. Chatterjee and Don E. Scheid (eds.), Ethics and Foreign Intervention (Cambridge University Press, 2003), 31–50
Evans, Gareth is the author of the book The Responsibility to Protect: Ending Mass Atrocity Crimes Once and For All (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2008)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×