Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T04:04:24.405Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - Responsibility to protect and the language of crimes

Collective action and individual culpability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2014

By
Jennifer M. Welsh
Edited by
Don E. Scheid
Jennifer M. Welsh
Affiliation:
European University Institute
Don E. Scheid
Affiliation:
Winona State University, Minnesota
Get access

Summary

The debate surrounding the legitimacy of armed humanitarian intervention often constructs a duel between those committed to the protection of individual rights and those concerned with preserving the rights of sovereign entities to non-interference. This framing, however, obscures the fact that there are three sets of ethical and legal norms that collide in situations of mass human suffering: the inviolability of state sovereignty (and the associated norm of territorial integrity); the right of individuals to be free of gross violations of their rights (particularly the right to life); and the just-war injunction against the use of force, except as a last resort. The latter principle, which arises from a sober recognition of the human suffering, physical destruction, and political and social instability that frequently accompanies the use of military force, is often forgotten in the heated exchanges between proponents of individual rights and the guardians of sovereign rights. Yet the imperative of last resort has become central to contemporary efforts to forge a consensus around the implementation of the principle of the Responsibility to Protect (RtoP), particularly in the wake of 2011 military action in Libya, which many countries in the global South viewed as an illegitimate extension of the mandate of civilian protection to the more contested objective of overthrowing the Gaddafi regime. A Brazilian government initiative, Responsibility while Protecting, is aimed at reinterpreting RtoP – and enhancing the consensus around it – by emphasizing the international community’s non-military options for exercising the norm, limiting the recourse to force to instances in which diplomatic and other means have been exhausted, and strengthening the accountability of those who act militarily on behalf of the Council.

Keywords

Responsibility to Protectgenocideinternational communitywar crimesconflict preventioncrimes against humanityethnic cleansing
Type
Chapter
Information
The Ethics of Armed Humanitarian Intervention , pp. 209 - 223
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Walzer, Michael, Just and Unjust Wars, 3rd edn. (New York: Basic Books, 2000), 107Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha and Sikkink, Kathryn, “International Norm Dynamic and Political Change,” International Organization 52, no. 4 (1998), 887–917CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Florini, Ann, “The Evolution of International Norms,” International Studies Quarterly 40, no. 3 (1996), 363–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abbott, Kenneth W., Robert O. Keohane, Andrew Moravcsik, Anne-Marie Slaughter, and Duncan Snidal, “The Concept of Legalization,” International Organization 54, no. 3 (2000), 401–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellamy, Alex J., Global Politics and the Responsibility to Protect: From Words to Deeds (London and New York: Routledge, 2011), 21–25Google Scholar
Kouchner, M. Bernard, “Burma,” Le Monde (May 20, 2008)Google Scholar
Thakur, Ramesh, “Should the UN Invoke the ‘Responsibility to Protect’?” Globe and Mail (May 8, 2008)Google Scholar
Evans, Gareth, “Facing Up to Our Responsibilities,” Guardian (May 12, 2008)Google Scholar
Harrington, Joanna, “R2P and Natural Disasters,” in Knight, Andy W. and Egerton, Frazer (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of the Responsibility to Protect (New York: Routledge, 2012), 141–51Google Scholar
Evans, Gareth, The Responsibility to Protect: Ending Mass Atrocity Crimes Once and For All (Washington, DC: Brookings, 2008), 64–65Google Scholar
Drumbl, Mark, Atrocity, Punishment and International Law (Cambridge University Press, 2007), 4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassesse, Antonio, International Criminal Law, 2nd edn. (Oxford University Press, 2008), 11–12Google Scholar
Hubert, Don and Blätter, Ariela, “The Responsibility to Protect as International Crimes Prevention,” Global Responsibility to Protect 4 (2012), 33–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheffer, David, “Atrocity Crimes Framing the Responsibility to Protect,” Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law 40, no. 1 (2008), 128–29Google Scholar
Weiner, Antje, “Enacting Meaning-in-Use: Qualitative Research on Norms and International Relations,” Review of International Studies 35, no. 1 (2009), 175–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thakur, Ramesh, “West Shouldn’t Fault Sir Lankan Government Tactics,” Daily Yomiuri (June 12, 2009)Google Scholar
Luban, David and Shue, Henry, “Mental Torture: A Critique of Erasures in US Law,” The Georgetown Law Journal 100 (2012), 850–55Google Scholar
Bellamy, Alex J., “Libya and the Responsibility to Protect: The Exception and the Norm,” Ethics & International Affairs 25, no. 3 (Fall 2011), 263–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellamy, Alex J. and Williams, Paul D., “The New Politics of Protection? Côte d’Ivoire, Libya, and the Responsibility to Protect,” International Affairs 87, no. 4 (2011), 825–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babbitt, Eileen, “Mediation and the Prevention of Mass Atrocities,” in Monica Serrano and Tom Weiss (eds.), The International Politics of Human Rights: Rallying to the R2P Cause? (Paterson: Routledge, 2014)Google Scholar
Snyder, Jack and Vinjamuri, Leslie in “Trials and Errors: Principle and Pragmatism in Strategies of International Justice,” International Security 28, no. 3 (2003/2004), 5–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mennecke, Martin, “Punishing Genocidaires: A Deterrent Effect or Not?” Human Rights Review 8, no. 4 (2007), 319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirsch, Andrew von, Anthony E. Bottoms, Elizabeth Burney, and Per-Olof H. Wikstrom, Criminal Deterrence and Sentence Severity: An Analysis of Recent Research (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1999), 5Google Scholar
Vinjamuri, Leslie, “Deterrence, Democracy, and the Pursuit of International Justice During Comflict,” Ethics & International Affairs 24, no. 2 (2010), 191–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, David, “Distributing Responsibilities,” Journal of Political Philosophy 9, no. 4 (2001), 453–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pattison, James, Humanitarian Intervention and the Responsibility to Protect (Oxford University Press, 2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×