Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T12:36:37.745Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2014

W. Bradley Wendel
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Ethics and Law
An Introduction
, pp. 236 - 247
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexy, Robert, The Argument from Injustice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, Paulson, Bonnie Litschewski and Paulson, Stanley L., trans. 2002).Google Scholar
Amsterdam, Anthony, and Bruner, Jerome, Minding the Law (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press 2000).Google Scholar
Applbaum, Arthur Isak, Ethics for Adversaries (Princeton: Princeton University Press 1999).Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas, Summa Theologica, in Baumgarth, William P. and Regan, Richard J., eds., Aquinas on Law, Morality, and Politics (Indianapolis: Hackett, 2nd edn., 2002), pp. 10–69.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah, Eichmann in Jerusalem (New York: Viking 1963).Google Scholar
Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics. Ross, W. D. and Urmson, J. O. trans., in Ackrill, J. L., ed., A New Aristotle Reader (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press 1984).Google Scholar
Austin, John, The Province of Jurisprudence Determined (London: J. Murray 1832).Google Scholar
Aviel, Rebecca, “Why Civil Gideon Won’t Fix Family Law,” Yale Law Journal 122: 2106–24 (2013).Google Scholar
Babcock, Barbara, “Defending the Guilty,” Cleveland State Law Review 32: 175–87 (1983).Google Scholar
Barrett, Edward F., “The Adversary System and the Ethics of Advocacy,” Notre Dame Lawyer 37: 479–88 (1962).Google Scholar
Bazerman, Max H., and Tenbrunsel, Ann E., Blind Spots: Why We Fail to Do What’s Right and What to Do About It (Princeton: Princeton University Press 2011).CrossRef
Bazyler, Michael J., “Gray Zones of Holocaust Restitution: American Justice and Holocaust Morality,” in Petropoulos, Jonathan and Roth, John K. eds., Gray Zones: Ambiguity and Compromise in the Holocaust and Its Aftermath (New York: Berghan Books 2005), pp. 339–59.Google Scholar
Berlin, Isaiah, “The Pursuit of the Ideal,” in Hardy, Henry, ed., The Crooked Timber of Humanity (Princeton: Princeton University Press 1990), pp. 1–19.Google Scholar
Binder, Guyora, “Critical Legal Studies,” in Patterson, Dennis, ed., A Companion to Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory (Malden, Mass.: Blackwell 1996), pp. 280–90.Google Scholar
Blackstone, William, Commentaries on the Laws of England. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1979).Google Scholar
Bok, Sissela, Lying: Moral Choice in Public and Private Life (New York: Pantheon Books 1978).Google Scholar
Boon, Andrew, and Levin, Jennifer, The Ethics and Conduct of Lawyers in England and Wales (Oxford: Hart, 2nd edn. 2008).Google Scholar
Burnett, D. Graham, A Trial by Jury (New York: Knopf 2001).Google Scholar
Butler, Paul, “How Can You Prosecute Those People?,” in Smith, Abbe and Freedman, Monroe H., eds., How Can You Represent Those People? (New York: Palgrave MacMillan 2013), pp. 15–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carr, Albert Z., “Is Business Bluffing Ethical?,” Harvard Business Review (Jan.–Feb. 1968): 143–53.Google Scholar
Carrington, Paul D., “Unconscionable Lawyers,” Georgia Law Review 19: 361–94 (2002).Google Scholar
Cassidy, R. Michael, “Some Reflections on Ethics and Plea Bargaining: An Essay in Honor of Fred Zacharias,” San Diego Law Review 48: 93–110 (2011).Google Scholar
Cassidy, R. Michael, “Character and Context: What Virtue Theory Can Teach Us About a Prosecutor’s Ethical Duty to ‘Seek Justice,’Notre Dame Law Review 82: 635–97 (2006).Google Scholar
Clemmer, Christopher D., “Obstructing the Bernardo Investigation: Kenneth Murray and the Defence Counsel’s Conflicting Obligations to Clients and the Court,” Osgoode Hall Review of Law and Policy 1: 137 (2008).Google Scholar
Clermont, Kevin M., Standards of Decision in Law (Durham, N.C.: Carolina Academic Press 2013).Google Scholar
Cochran, Johnnie L., “How Can You Defend Those People?,” Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 30: 39–43 (1996).Google Scholar
Code, Michael, “Ethics and Criminal Law Practice,” in Woolley, Alice et al., eds., Lawyers’ Ethics and Professional Regulation (Markham, Ont.: LexisNexis 2008).Google Scholar
Coffee, John C., “The Attorney as Gatekeeper: An Agenda for the SEC,” Columbia Law Review 103: 1293–1316 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Steven M., “What Is True? Perspectives of a Former Prosecutor,” Cardozo Law Review 23: 817–28 (2002).Google Scholar
Cole, David, No Equal Justice: Race and Class in the American Criminal Justice System (New York: New Press 1999).Google Scholar
Coleman, Jules, “Negative and Positive Positivism,” in Cohen, Marshall, ed., Ronald Dworkin and Contemporary Jurisprudence (Totowa, N.J.: Rowman & Allanheld 1983), pp. 28–48.Google Scholar
Cooper, Austin, “The Ken Murray Case: Defence Counsel’s Dilemma,” Criminal Law Quarterly 47: 41 (2009).Google Scholar
Cover, Robert M., Justice Accused (New Haven: Yale University Press 1975).Google Scholar
Crenshaw, Kimberle, “A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Law and Politics,” in Kairys, David, ed., The Politics of Law: A Progressive Critique (New York: Pantheon Books, revised edn. 1990), 195–218.Google Scholar
Dagger, Richard, “Political Obligation,” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy,
Damaška, Mirjan R., The Faces of Justice and State Authority (New Haven: Yale University Press 1986).Google Scholar
Daniels, Norman, “Reflective Equilibrium,” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy,
Dare, Tim, The Counsel of Rogues? A Defence of the Standard Conception of the Lawyer’s Role (Farnham: Ashgate 2009).Google Scholar
Darley, John M., “The Cognitive and Social Psychology of Contagious Organizational Corruption,” Brooklyn Law Review 70: 1177–94 (2005).Google Scholar
Dauer, Edward A., and Leff, Arthur Allen, “Correspondence: The Lawyer as Friend,” Yale Law Journal 86: 573–84 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Evan A., “The Meaning of Professional Independence,” Columbia Law Review 103: 1281–92 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dershowitz, Alan M., Reasonable Doubts: The Criminal Justice System and the O. J. Simpson Case (New York: Touchstone 1997).Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald, Taking Rights Seriously (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press 1977).Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald, Law’s Empire (Cambridge, Mass.:Harvard University Press 1986).Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald, “Rights as Trumps,” in Waldron, Jeremy, ed., Theories of Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press 1994), 153–67.Google Scholar
Ferren, John, “The Corporate Lawyer’s Obligation to the Public Interest,” Business Lawyer 33: 1253–69 (1978).Google Scholar
Finnis, John, Natural Law and Natural Rights (Oxford: Clarendon Press 1980).Google Scholar
Fish, Stanley, Is There a Text in This Class? The Authority of Interpretive Communities (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press 1982).Google Scholar
Fisher, William W., et al., eds., American Legal Realism (Oxford: Oxford University Press 1993).
Fiss, Owen M., “Objectivity and Interpretation,” Stanford Law Review 34: 739–63 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flathman, Richard E., “Legitimacy,” in Goodin, Robert E., Pettit, Philip, and Pogge, Thomas, eds., A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy (Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell, 2nd edn. 2012), pp. 678–84.Google Scholar
Flood, John, “Will There Be Fallout from Clementi? The Repercussions for the Legal Profession after the Legal Services Act 2007,” Michigan State Law Review 2012: 537–65 (2012).Google Scholar
Flood, John A., Barristers’ Clerks: The Law’s Middlemen (Manchester: Manchester University Press 1983).Google Scholar
Foot, Philippa, “The Problem of Abortion and the Doctrine of Double Effect,” in Virtues and Vices (Berkeley: University of California Press 1978), pp. 19–32.Google Scholar
Fox, Lawrence J., “The Fallout from Enron: Media Frenzy and Misguided Notions of Public Relations Are No Reason to Abandon Our Commitment to Our Clients,” Illinois Law Review 2003: 1243–59 (2003).Google Scholar
Frankena, William K., Ethics (Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1963).Google Scholar
Freedman, Monroe, and Smith, Abbe, Understanding Lawyers’ Ethics (New Providence, N.J.: Lexis-Nexis, 4th edn., 2010).Google Scholar
Freedman, Monroe H., “Why It’s Essential to Represent ‘Those People,’” in Smith, Abbe and Freedman, Monroe H., eds., How Can You Represent Those People? (New York: Palgrave MacMillan 2013), pp. 73–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freedman, Monroe H., “The Lawyer’s Moral Obligation of Justification,” Texas Law Review 74: 111–18 (1995).Google Scholar
Freedman, Monroe H., Lawyers’ Ethics in an Adversary System (Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill 1975).Google Scholar
Freeman, Samuel, “John Rawls – An Introduction,” in Freeman, Samuel, ed., The Cambridge Companion to Rawls (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2003), pp. 1–61.Google Scholar
Fried, Charles, “The Lawyer as Friend: The Moral Foundations of the Lawyer-Client Relation,” Yale Law Journal 85: 1060–89 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fried, Charles, Contract as Promise (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press 1981).Google Scholar
Fuller, Lon L., “Positivism and Fidelity to Law – A Reply to Professor Hart,” Harvard Law Review 71: 630–72 (1958).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, Lon L., The Morality of Law (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2d edn., 1964).Google Scholar
Fuller, Lon L., and Randall, John D., “Professional Responsibility: Report of the Joint Conference,” American Bar Association Journal 44: 1159–62, 1216–18 (1958).Google Scholar
Gallie, W. B., “Essentially Contested Concepts,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 56: 167–198 (1956).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, Margaret, “Group Membership and Political Obligation,” The Monist 76: 119–31 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, Margaret, A Theory of Political Obligation (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilovich, Thomas, and Griffin, Dale W., “Judgment and Decision Making,” in Gilovich, Thomas, Keltner, Dacher, and Nisbett, Richard E., eds., Social Psychology (New York: Norton, 2d edn., 2011), pp. 542–88.Google Scholar
Glendon, Mary Ann, A Nation under Lawyers (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux 1994).Google Scholar
Green, Leslie, “Law and Obligations,” in Coleman, Jules and Shapiro, Scott, eds., The Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence & Philosophy of Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2002), pp. 514–47.Google Scholar
Greenawalt, Kent, Conflicts of Law and Morality (Oxford: Oxford University Press 1989).Google Scholar
Harr, Jonathan, A Civil Action (New York: Random House 1995).Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A., “Are There Any Natural Rights?,” Philosophical Review 64: 175–91 (1955).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, H. L. A., “Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals,” Harvard Law Review 71: 593–629 (1958).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, H. L. A., The Concept of Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2d edn., 1994) (with Postscript edited by Bulloch, Penelope A. and Raz, Joseph).Google Scholar
Hazard, Geoffrey C., Ethics in the Practice of Law (New Haven: Yale University Press 1978).Google Scholar
Hazard, Geoffrey C., “Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes?,” Yale Law Journal 95: 1523–35 (1986) (book review).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hazard, Geoffrey C., and Dondi, Angelo, Legal Ethics: A Comparative Study (Stanford: Stanford University Press 2004).Google Scholar
Hazard, Geoffrey C., and Remus, Dana A., “Advocacy Revalued,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 159: 751–81 (2011).Google Scholar
Hohfeld, Wesley Newcomb, “Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning,” Yale Law Journal 26: 710–70 (1917).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horwitz, Morton, The Transformation of American Law, 1780–1860 (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press 1977).
Hume, David, “On the Original Contract,” in Barker, Ernest, ed., Social Contract (Oxford: Oxford University Press 1947), pp. 147–66.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, Allan C., “Calgary and Everything After: A Postmodern Re-Vision of Lawyering,” Alberta Law Review 33: 768–86 (1995).Google Scholar
Jackall, Robert, Moral Mazes: The World of Corporate Managers (Oxford: Oxford University Press 1988).Google Scholar
Janis, Irvin, Victims of Groupthink: A Psychological Study of Foreign Policy Decisions and Fiascoes (Boston: Houghton-Mifflin 1972).Google Scholar
Johnston, David, A Brief History of Justice (Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joseph, Lawrence, Lawyerland: What Lawyers Talk About When They Talk About Law (New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux 1997).Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel, Thinking, Fast and Slow (New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux 2011).Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals (Ellington, James W., trans.) (Indianapolis: Hackett 1981).Google Scholar
Kelman, Mark, A Guide to Critical Legal Studies (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press 1987).Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan, A Critique of Adjudication {fin de siècle} (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press 1997).Google Scholar
Koniak, Susan P., “When the Hurlyburly’s Done: The Bar’s Struggle with the SEC,” Columbia Law Review 103: 1236–80 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, Matthew H., Objectivity and the Rule of Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kronman, Anthony T., The Lost Lawyer: Failing Ideals of the Legal Profession (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press 1993).Google Scholar
Kruse, Katherine R., “The Human Dignity of Clients,” Cornell Law Review 93: 1343–64 (2008).Google Scholar
Kruse, Katherine R., “Beyond Cardboard Clients in Legal Ethics,” Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics 23: 103–54 (2010).Google Scholar
Kunen, James S., “How Can You Defend Those People?”: The Making of a Criminal Lawyer (New York: Random House 1983).
Lahav, Alexandra D., “Portraits of Resistance: Lawyer Responses to Unjust Proceedings,” UCLA Law Review 57: 725–87 (2010).Google Scholar
Langevoort, Donald C., “The Epistemology of Corporate-Securities Lawyering: Beliefs, Biases, and Organizational Behavior,” Brooklyn Law Review 63: 629–76 (1997).Google Scholar
Leiter, Brian, “Legal Realism,” in Patterson, Dennis, ed., A Companion to Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory (Oxford: Blackwell 1996), pp. 261–79.Google Scholar
Levin, Yuval, The Great Debate: Edmund Burke, Thomas Paine, and the Birth of Right and Left (New York: Basic Books 2014).Google Scholar
Locke, John, Second Treatise of Civil Government (1690), ch. IV, sec. 22. Macpherson, C., ed. (Indianapolis: Hackett 1980).Google Scholar
Loo, Dennis D., and Grimes, Ruth-Ellen M., “Polls, Politics, and Crime: The ‘Law and Order’ Issue of the 1960s,” Western Criminology Review 5: 50–67 (2004).Google Scholar
Luban, David, “Paternalism and the Legal Profession,” Wisconsin Law Review 1981: 454–93 (1981).Google Scholar
Luban, David, “The Adversary System Excuse,” in Luban, David, ed., The Good Lawyer: Lawyers’ Roles and Lawyers’ Ethics (Totowa, N.J.: Rowman & Allanheld 1983), pp. 83–122.Google Scholar
Luban, David, “The Lysistratian Prerogative: A Response to Stephen Pepper,” American Bar Foundation Research Journal 1986: 637–49 (1986).Google Scholar
Luban, David, Lawyers and Justice (Princeton: Princeton University Press 1988).Google Scholar
Luban, David, Legal Ethics and Human Dignity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luban, David, “Lawfare and Legal Ethics in Guantánamo,” Stanford Law Review 60: 1981–2026 (2008).Google Scholar
Luban, David, “The Conscience of a Prosecutor,” Valparaiso University Law Review 45: 1–31 (2010).Google Scholar
Lyons, David, Ethics and the Rule of Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1984).Google Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdair, After Virtue (Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press, 2d edn., 1984).Google Scholar
Margulies, Joseph, Guantánamo and the Abuse of Presidential Power (New York: Simon & Schuster 2006).Google Scholar
Markovits, Daniel, A Modern Legal Ethics (Princeton: Princeton University Press 2008).Google Scholar
Marmor, Andrei, Philosophy of Law (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press 2011).Google Scholar
Merryman, John Henry, The Civil Law Tradition (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2d edn., 1985).Google Scholar
Mitchell, John B., “The Ethics of the Criminal Defense Attorney – New Answers to Old Questions,” Stanford Law Review 32: 293–337 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, John B., “Reasonable Doubts Are Where You Find Them,” Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics 1: 339–61 (1987).Google Scholar
Morris, Herbert, “Persons and Punishment,” The Monist 52: 475–501 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muller, Ingo, Hitler’s Justice: The Courts of the Third Reich (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press 1992).Google Scholar
Murphy, Mark C., Natural Law in Jurisprudence and Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagel, Thomas, “The Fragmentation of Value,” in Mortal Questions (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1979), pp. 128–41.Google Scholar
Neiman, Susan, Evil in Modern Thought (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press 2002.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha C., Sex and Social Justice (Oxford: Oxford University Press 1999).Google Scholar
Ogletree, Charles J., “Beyond Justifications: Seeking Motivations to Sustain Public Defenders,” Harvard Law Review 106: 1239–94 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, Edgar O., “Is Rent Control Good Social Policy?,” Chicago-Kent Law Review 67: 921–45 (1991).Google Scholar
Parker, Christine, and Evans, Adrian, Inside Lawyers’ Ethics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pennington, Nancy, and Hastie, Reid, “A Cognitive Theory of Juror Decision Making: The Story Model,” Cardozo Law Review 13: 519–57 (1991).Google Scholar
Pepper, Stephen L., “The Lawyer’s Amoral Ethical Role: A Defense, A Problem, and Some Possibilities,” American Bar Foundation Research Journal 1986: 613–35 (1986).Google Scholar
Pitkin, Hanna, “Obligation and Consent – I,” American Political Science Review 59: 990–99 (1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plato, “Crito,” Tredennick, Hugh, trans., in Hamilton, Edith and Cairns, Huntington, eds., Plato: The Complete Dialogues (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press 1961).Google Scholar
Postema, Gerald J., “Moral Responsibility and Professional Ethics,” New York University Law Review 55: 63–89 (1980).Google Scholar
Rawls, John, A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press 1971).Google Scholar
Rawls, John, Political Liberalism (New York: Columbia University Press 1993).Google Scholar
Rawls, John, “Legal Obligation and the Duty of Fair Play,” in Freeman, Samuel, ed., John Rawls: Collected Papers (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press 1999), pp. 117–29.Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph, The Authority of Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press 1979).Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph, “Rights-Based Moralities,” in Waldron, Jeremy, ed., Theories of Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press 1984), pp. 182–200.Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph, The Morality of Freedom (Oxford: Oxford University Press 1986).Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph, “Authority, Law, and Morality,” in Ethics in the Public Domain (Oxford: Oxford University Press 1994).Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph, “Incorporation By Law,” Legal Theory 10: 1–17 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reath, Andrews, “Kant’s Moral Philosophy,” in Crisp, Roger, ed., The Oxford Handbook of the History of Ethics (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2013), pp. 443–64.Google Scholar
Regan, Milton C., Eat What You Kill: The Fall of a Wall Street Lawyer (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhode, Deborah L., In the Interests of Justice: Reforming the Legal Profession (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2000).Google Scholar
Ross, W. D., The Right and the Good (Oxford: Oxford University Press 1930).Google Scholar
Ross, Ysaiah, Ethics in Law: Lawyers’ Responsibility and Accountability in Australia (Chatswood, N.S.W.: Butterworths, 10th edn., 2010).Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin, “The Profession Versus the Public Interest: Reflections on Two Reifications,” Stanford Law Review 54: 1491–99 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sartre, Jean-Paul, “Existentialism Is a Humanism,” (Mairet, Philip, trans.) in Kaufmann, Walter, ed., Existentialism from Dostoevsky to Sartre (New York: Meridian 1957), pp. 287–311.Google Scholar
Scanlon, T. M., What We Owe to Each Other (Cambridge: Harvard University Press 1998).Google Scholar
Schauer, Frederick, The Force of Law (manuscript, forthcoming).
Scheffler, Samuel, ed., Consequentialism and Its Critics (Oxford: Oxford University Press 1988).
Schwartz, Murray, “The Professionalism and Accountability of Lawyers,” California Law Review 66: 669–98 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaffer, Thomas L., On Being a Christian and a Lawyer (Provo, Utah: Brigham Young University Press 1981).Google Scholar
Shapiro, Scott J., “Authority,” in Coleman, Jules and Shapiro, Scott, eds., The Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2002), pp. 382–439.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Scott J., “The ‘Hart-Dworkin’ Debate: A Short Guide for the Perplexed,” in Ripstein, Arthur, ed., Ronald Dworkin (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2007), pp. 22–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, Scott J., Legality (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press 2011).Google Scholar
Shiffrin, Seana Valentine, “Promising, Intimate Relationships, and Conventionalism,” Philosophical Review 117: 481–524 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, A. John, Moral Principles and Political Obligations (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press 1979).Google Scholar
Simmons, A. John, “Associative Political Obligations,” Ethics 106: 247–73 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, A. John, Political Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2008).Google Scholar
Simon, William H., “The Ideology of Advocacy: Procedural Justice and Professional Ethics,” Wisconsin Law Review 1978: 29–144 (1978).Google Scholar
Simon, William H., “Ethical Discretion in Lawyering,” Harvard Law Review 101: 1083–1145 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, William H., The Practice of Justice (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press 1998).Google Scholar
Simon, William H., “Authoritarian Legal Ethics: Bradley Wendel and the Positivist Turn,” Texas Law Review 90: 709–26 (2012).Google Scholar
Singer, Peter, “Famine, Affluence, and Morality,” Philosophy and Public Affairs 1: 229–43 (1972).Google Scholar
Smith, Abbe, “Defending Defending: The Case for Unmitigated Zeal on Behalf of People Who Do Terrible Things,” Hofstra Law Review 28: 925–61 (2000).Google Scholar
Smith, Abbe, and Freedman, Monroe H., How Can You Represent Those People? (New York: Palgrave MacMillan 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Clive Stafford, Eight O’clock Ferry to the Windward Side: Seeking Justice in Guantánamo Bay (New York: Nation Books 2007).Google Scholar
Smith, M. B. E., “Is There a Prima Facie Obligation to Obey the Law?,” Yale Law Journal 82: 950–76 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Susskind, Richard, The End of Lawyers? Rethinking the Nature of Legal Services (Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Tenbrunsel, Ann E., and Messick, David M., “Ethical Fading: The Role of Self-Deception in Unethical Behavior,” Social Justice Research 17: 223–36 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, Judith Jarvis, “The Trolley Problem,” Yale Law Journal 94: 1395–1415 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tigar, Michael E., “Defending,” Texas Law Review 74: 101–110 (1995).Google Scholar
Tigar, Michael E., “Litigators’ Ethics,” Tennessee Law Review 67: 409–24 (2000).Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard, “Hobbes,” in Great Political Thinkers (Oxford: Oxford University Press 1992).Google Scholar
Unger, Roberto Mangabeira, Knowledge and Politics (New York: Free Press 1987).Google Scholar
Vaughan, Diane, The Challenger Launch Decision: Risky Technology, Culture, and Deviance at NASA (Chicago: University of Chicago Press 1996).Google Scholar
Vischer, Robert K., Martin Luther King Jr. and the Morality of Legal Practice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2013).Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy, “A Right to Do Wrong,” Ethics 92: 21–39 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy, “Two Sides of the Coin,” in Liberal Rights (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1993), pp. 1–34.Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy, “Rights,” in Goodin, Robert E., Pettit, Philip and Pogge, Thomas, eds., A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy (Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2d edn., 2012), pp. 745–54.Google Scholar
Walker, A. D. M., “Political Obligation and the Argument from Gratitude,” Philosophy and Public Affairs 17: 191–211 (1988).Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael, Spheres of Justice (New York: Basic Books 1983).Google Scholar
Webb, Duncan, Ethics, Professional Responsibility and the Lawyer (Wellington: Butterworths 2000).Google Scholar
Weber, Max, “Bureaucracy,” in Gerth, H. H. and Mills, C. Wright, ed. and trans., From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology (Oxford: Oxford University Press 1946), pp. 196–244.Google Scholar
Wendel, W. Bradley, Lawyers and Fidelity to Law (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, James Boyd, Heracles’ Bow: Essays on the Rhetoric and Poetics of the Law (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press 1985).Google Scholar
Wilkins, David B., “Legal Realism for Lawyers,” Harvard Law Review 104: 468–524 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Bernard, Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press 1985).Google Scholar
Williams, Patricia J., “The Pain of Word Bondage,” in The Alchemy of Race and Rights (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press 1991), pp. 146–65.Google Scholar
Wishman, Seymour, Confessions of a Criminal Lawyer (New York: Times Books 1981).Google Scholar
Wolff, Robert Paul, In Defense of Anarchy (New York: Harper & Row 1970).Google Scholar
Wolff, Robert Paul, “The Conflict Between Authority and Autonomy,” in Raz, Joseph, ed., Authority (New York: New York University Press 1990), pp. 20–31.Google Scholar
Woolley, Alice, Understanding Lawyers’ Ethics in Canada (Markham, Ont.: LexisNexis 2011).Google Scholar
Woolley, Alice, et al., Lawyers’ Ethics and Professional Regulation (Markham, Ont.: LexisNexis 2008).Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion, Justice and the Politics of Difference (Princeton: Princeton University Press 1990).Google Scholar
Zimbardo, Philip, The Lucifer Effect: Understanding How Good People Turn Evil (New York: Random House 2008).Google Scholar
Ziv, Neta, “Lawyers Talking Rights and Clients Breaking Rules: Between Legal Positivism and Distributive Justice in Israeli Poverty Lawyering,” Clinical Law Review 11: 209–39 (2004).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • W. Bradley Wendel, Cornell University, New York
  • Book: Ethics and Law
  • Online publication: 05 October 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107337114.015
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • W. Bradley Wendel, Cornell University, New York
  • Book: Ethics and Law
  • Online publication: 05 October 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107337114.015
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • W. Bradley Wendel, Cornell University, New York
  • Book: Ethics and Law
  • Online publication: 05 October 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107337114.015
Available formats
×