Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Contributors
- Preface
- Part I Academic Cheating
- Part II Academic Excuses and Fairness
- Part III Authorship and Credit
- 12 An Ethical Dilemma in Publishing
- 13 What Does Authorship Mean?
- 14 The Ethical Use of Published Scales
- 15 Idea Poaching Behind the Veil of Blind Peer Review
- 16 An Ethical Challenge
- 17 Authorship
- 18 Publication of Student Data When the Student Cannot Be Contacted
- 19 Ethics in Research
- 20 Resolving Ethical Lapses in the Non-Publication of Dissertations
- 21 Theft
- 22 Claiming the Ownership of Someone Else’s Idea
- 23 Commentary to Part III
- Part IV Confidentiality’s Limits
- Part V Data Analysis, Reporting, and Sharing
- Part VI Designing Research
- Part VII Fabricating Data
- Part VIII Human Subjects
- Part IX Personnel Decisions
- Part X Reviewing and Editing
- Part XI Science for Hire and Conflict of Interest
- Epilogue Why Is Ethical Behavior Challenging?
- Index
- References
20 - Resolving Ethical Lapses in the Non-Publication of Dissertations
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 February 2015
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Contributors
- Preface
- Part I Academic Cheating
- Part II Academic Excuses and Fairness
- Part III Authorship and Credit
- 12 An Ethical Dilemma in Publishing
- 13 What Does Authorship Mean?
- 14 The Ethical Use of Published Scales
- 15 Idea Poaching Behind the Veil of Blind Peer Review
- 16 An Ethical Challenge
- 17 Authorship
- 18 Publication of Student Data When the Student Cannot Be Contacted
- 19 Ethics in Research
- 20 Resolving Ethical Lapses in the Non-Publication of Dissertations
- 21 Theft
- 22 Claiming the Ownership of Someone Else’s Idea
- 23 Commentary to Part III
- Part IV Confidentiality’s Limits
- Part V Data Analysis, Reporting, and Sharing
- Part VI Designing Research
- Part VII Fabricating Data
- Part VIII Human Subjects
- Part IX Personnel Decisions
- Part X Reviewing and Editing
- Part XI Science for Hire and Conflict of Interest
- Epilogue Why Is Ethical Behavior Challenging?
- Index
- References
Summary
If a doctoral dissertation is an original scholarly contribution to knowledge, then it seems important that the information gained be disseminated through means of publication, where its contribution can benefit society. In our view, for a dissertation to have an impact, submitting to ProQuest UMI, for example, does not suffice as publication, even though called “publishing” by the company. Even though this is the primary archive for dissertations and theses including an estimated “95% to 98% of all U.S. doctoral dissertations” (Proquest, 2013), limited access to these archives and their lack of use by many professionals may limit the visibility and ultimate utility of those projects only published in this forum.
Unfortunately, we have observed a number of students who have “walked away” from their dissertations (or masters’ theses) after being awarded their degrees (and not just in our own graduate program). These students, for a variety of reasons, do not pursue publication of these projects. These decisions not to seek publication are rarely due to poorly conceived or inadequately conducted research. In fact, some dissertation research may be of higher quality than published research is (McLeod & Weisz, 2004). Nor have these projects resulted in uninterpretable, nonsignificant, or unoriginal findings, which therefore might not constitute uniquely valuable contributions to the scholarly literature. Indeed, in many cases, the “quality assurance” mechanisms of mentorship, committee review, and oral and written defenses are often sufficient to obviate such undesirable outcomes (McLeod & Weisz, 2004). Non-publication apparently results from a lack of further interest or incentive to publish and a desire to move on to other career activities.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Ethical Challenges in the Behavioral and Brain SciencesCase Studies and Commentaries, pp. 59 - 62Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2015