Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T10:18:47.933Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Lump-sum taxes and transfers: public debt in the overlapping-generations model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 October 2011

Yves Balasko
Affiliation:
Université de Genève
Karl Shell
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania
Walter P. Heller
Affiliation:
University of California, San Diego
Ross M. Starr
Affiliation:
University of California, San Diego
David A. Starrett
Affiliation:
Stanford University, California
Get access

Summary

Introduction, summary, and reader's guide

Americans are hearing a lot these days about the government deficit and its integral, the public debt. The subject is hardly new for students of public finance and macroeconomics. In this chapter, we return to square one. We examine the nature of the intertemporal consistency restrictions imposed on the government's fiscal policy. In particular, we evaluate the basis for the current (“neo-Ricardian”) fixation with long-run debt retirement.

Our analysis is cast in terms of the standard overlapping-generations model of exchange. Consumers are assumed to possess perfect foresight. The government commits itself to a full intertemporal fiscal policy, which it announces at the beginning of time. There is assumed to be neither intrinsic uncertainty nor extrinsic uncertainty. The spot markets and the borrowing-and-lending markets are complete and competitive. Participation in these markets is restricted only by the natural lifetimes of the consumers. Since sunspot equilibria are ruled out by assumption, the restrictions on market participation are not essential.

Trading is assumed to be costless. Financial assets have only two roles. They are potential value stores. They can also be used by consumers in paying their taxes (and by the government in distributing transfers). In this environment, financial instruments are in essence identical. We can assume, therefore, that there is only one type of instrument, called “money.” (Since it serves no special role in facilitating exchange, you might prefer to think of this instrument as a “bond,” a bond that does not pay nominal interest but can appreciate in value relative to commodities.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×