Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Figures and Tables
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Who Owns the Environment?
- 2 Is Government Regulation the Solution?
- 3 Property Rights for the Common Pool
- 4 Local Property Rights to the Commons
- 5 The Politics of Property Rights
- 6 From Property Rights to Markets
- 7 Tackling the Global Commons
- 8 Property Rights and Environmental Markets
- Index
- References
3 - Property Rights for the Common Pool
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 July 2014
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Figures and Tables
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Who Owns the Environment?
- 2 Is Government Regulation the Solution?
- 3 Property Rights for the Common Pool
- 4 Local Property Rights to the Commons
- 5 The Politics of Property Rights
- 6 From Property Rights to Markets
- 7 Tackling the Global Commons
- 8 Property Rights and Environmental Markets
- Index
- References
Summary
Having considered the prospects and pitfalls of government provision of environmental goods and services in Chapter 2, we now turn to the same for markets. In this chapter we carefully examine the arguments of Ronald Coase as they relate to property rights and bargaining costs in the context of environmental markets. Coase is noted for building his analysis on the assumption of zero transaction costs and for concluding that under that condition, resources will be efficiently allocated. We recognize the usefulness of this approach for understanding the relationship between property rights and social costs. Our emphasis in this chapter, however, is on the potential for markets to lower transaction costs relative to those encountered in governmental regulation and to thereby provide environmental goods and services more efficiently.
To be sure, transaction costs might impede market solutions when there are ill-defined and ill-enforced property rights that cannot be easily changed, large numbers of bargaining parties, free riders, limited or asymmetric information about the environmental problem, or non-competitive markets. We do not discount the importance of market transaction costs, but rather compare them with the transaction costs inherent in government regulation. One advantage of markets, even in the presence of such costs, is that they can be more flexible than government regulations in the face of changing resource values and technology. It is in the interest of market participants to respond effectively and quickly, particularly as the markets are more competitive. Government officials are not direct residual claimants in these situations and have more constituents and political interests to consider in determining how to react to new conditions. This explains why, for example, many government policies and agencies remain long after the conditions that led to their creation have disappeared.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Environmental MarketsA Property Rights Approach, pp. 53 - 91Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2014
References
(2011), Environmental Economics, 2nd Edition, New York: Oxford University Press, 262–274Google Scholar
and (1996), Halting Degradation of Natural Resources: Is there a Role for Rural Communities? New York: Oxford University Press, 52–56Google Scholar
and (1985), “The Influence of Private Contractual Failure on Regulation: The Case of Oil Field Unitization,” The Journal of Political Economy, 93(4): 690–714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1997), “ A Model of Regulated Open Access Resource Use,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 32: 1–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2003), “The Struggle to Govern the Commons,” Science 302(5652): 1907–1912CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , , and (1990), “The Tragedy of the Commons: Twenty-Two Years Later,” Human Ecology 18(1): 1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1972), “On Taxation and the Control of Externalities,” American Economic Review 62(3): 307–322Google Scholar
(1958), “The Anatomy of Market Failure,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 72: 351–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2011) Environmental Economics, 2nd Edition, New York: Oxford University Press, 243–47Google Scholar
and (2001), “Information Distortion and Competitive Remedies in Government Transfer Policies: The Case of Ethanol,” Economics of Governance 2(2): 101–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2010), “Green Economics: How We Can Afford to Tackle Climate Change,” New York Times Magazine
(1995), “Transaction Costs and Tradable Permits,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 29: 133–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1970), “The Structure of a Contract and the Theory of a Non-Exclusive Resource,” Journal of Law and Economics 13(1): 49–70Google Scholar
(1981), Locking Up the Range: Federal Land Controls and GrazingCambridge, MA: Ballinger PublishingGoogle Scholar
and (2004), “The Allocation of Property Rights to Land: US Land Policy and Farm Failure in the Northern Great Plains,” Explorations in Economic History 41: 103–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2007), “The Assignment of Property Rights on the Western Frontier: Lessons for Contemporary Environmental and Resource Policy,” Journal of Economic History 67(2): 257–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2004), The Not So Wild, Wild West: Property Rights on the Frontier, Palo Alto: Stanford University PressGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (1971), Institutional Change and American Economic Growth, New York: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1983), “Privatizing the Commons: An Improvement?” Southern Economic Journal 50(2): 438–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1990), “The Race for Property Rights,” The Journal of Law and Economics 33(1): 177–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1995), “Public Grazing in the West and ‘Rangeland Reform ’94,’” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 77(3): 447–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1964), “The Exchange and Enforcement of Property Rights,” The Journal of Law and Economics, 7: 11–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1986), “Of Coase and Cattle: Dispute Resolution Among Neighbors in Shasta County,” Stanford Law Review 38: 623–687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2009), “Chinatown Revisited: Owens Valley and Los Angeles – Bargaining Costs and Fairness Perceptions of the First Major Water Rights Exchange,” Journal of Law Economics and Organization, 25(2): 311–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1973), “The Fable of the Bees: An Economic Investigation,” The Journal of Law and Economics, 16(1): 11–33Google Scholar
, , , and (2003), “The Fable of the Bees Revisited: Causes and Consequences of the U.S. Honey Program,” The Journal of Law and Economics 46(2): 479–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1989), “An Economic Analysis of Legal Disputes and their Resolution,” Journal of Legal Studies 27: 1067–1097Google Scholar
and (2007), “The European Union Emissions Trading Scheme: Origins, Allocation, and Early Results,” Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 1(1): 66–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1990), “The Constitution, Property Rights and the Future of Water Law,” University of Colorado Law Review 61: 257–282Google Scholar
and (2007), Saving Our Streams: Harnessing Water Markets, A Practical Guide. Bozeman, MT: The Property and Environment Research CenterGoogle Scholar
(2004), “The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: The First Ten Years of the Oregon Water Trust,” Nebraska Law Review 432–484
, , , , , and (2007), Envisioning Futures for the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
(2009), Fixing the Delta: How Will We Pay For It?, San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
, , and (2007), “Effects of Flow Diversions on Water and Habitat Quality: Examples from California's Highly Manipulated Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta.” San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science 5(3)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2004), “Temperature Effects on Juvenile Anadromous Salmonids in California's Central Valley: What Don't We Know?” Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 14: 113–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2006), Options, Futures and Other Derivatives, 6th Edition, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice HallGoogle Scholar
(2011), “Institutional Path Dependence in Climate Adaptation: Coman's “Some Unsettled Problems of Irrigation,” American Economic Review 101(February): 64–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2007), “Market-Based Environmental Policies: What Can We Learn from U.S. Experience (and Related Research)?” in and , eds., Moving to Markets in Environmental Regulation, New York: Oxford University Press, 30–31Google Scholar
and (1994), The Federal Civil Service and the Problem of Bureaucracy: The Economics and Politics of Institutional Change, Chicago: University of Chicago Press and NBER, 154–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004), Lawlessness and Economics: Alternative Modes of Governance, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 138–143Google Scholar
(2006), “Evolution and Chaos in Property Rights Systems: The Third World Tragedy of Contested Access,” The Yale Law Journal 115: 996–1048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2003), “Preemptive Habitat Destruction Under the Endangered Species Act,” Journal of Law and Economics, 46(1): 27–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1979), “Transaction Cost Economics: the Governance of Contractual Relations,” The Journal of Law and Economics, 22(2): 233–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1982), “Measurement Cost and the Organization of Markets,” The Journal of Law and Economic, 25(1): 27–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (1996), “The Determinants and Impact of Property Rights: Land Titles on the Brazilian Frontier,” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 12(1): 25–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1978), “Economic Variables and the Development of the Law: The Case of Western Mineral Rights,” Journal of Economic History 38(2): 338–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2011), “The Demarcation of Land and the Role of Coordinating Property Institutions,” Journal of Political Economy, 119(3): 426–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1994), “Raid or Trade? An Economic Model of Indian-White Relations,” The Journal of Law and Economics 37(1): 39–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2007), “The Assignment of Property Rights on the Western Frontier: Lessons for Contemporary Environmental and Resource Policy,” The Journal of Economic History 67(2): 257–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1885), Mining Camps: A Study in American Frontier Government, New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 169Google Scholar
(1978, 345) quoting from the Journal of the Council of the First Legislative Assembly of the Territory of Nevada (San Francisco, 1862, 8)Google Scholar
(1977), “A Theory of Contract Choice and the California Gold Rush,’ The Journal of Law and Economics 20: 421–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and . “Increasing Returns and the Genesis of American Resource Abundance.” Industrial and Corporate Change 6, no. 2 (1997): 203–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (2011), “Efficiency Advantages of Grandfathering in Rights-Based Fisheries Management,” Annual Review of Resource Economics 3: 159–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1975), “The Evolution of Property Rights: A Study of the American West,” The Journal of Law and Economics 28(1): 163–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2010), “Barbed Wire: Property Rights and Agricultural Development,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 125(2): 767–810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1980), “The Extinction of the Passenger Pigeon Ectopistes Migratorius and Its Relevance to Contemporary Conservation,” Biological Conservation 17: 157–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1995), “Extinction and Market Forces: Two Case Studies,” Ecological Economics 13: 115–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1989), “The Economic Nature of Wildlife Law,” The Journal of Legal Studies 18(2): 291–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002), “The Extermination and Conservation of the American Bison,” Journal of Legal Studies, 31(S2): S609–S650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2011), “Buffalo Hunt: International Trade and the Virtual Extinction of the North American Bison,” American Economic Review 101(December): 3162–3195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2002), “The Economic Evolution of Petroleum Property Rights in the United States,” The Journal of Legal Studies 31(2, pt. 2): S589–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , and (2007), “Transferring Water in the American West: 1987–2005,” Michigan Journal of Law Reform 50(4): 1021–1053Google Scholar
(2008), “Governing Water: The Semicommons of Fluid Property Rights,” Arizona Law Review 50(2): 445–478Google Scholar
, , , , , and (2008), “Agricultural Water to Municipal Use: The Legal and Institutional Context for Voluntary Transactions in Arizona,” The Water Report 58: 9–20Google Scholar
, , and (1981), “The Definition of a Surface Water Right and Transferability,” Journal of Law and Economics 24(2): 273–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2009), “The Tragedy of the Commons in International Fisheries: An Empirical Examination,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 57: 321–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , (2006), “Deep-Sea Fishes Qualify as Endangered: A Shift from Shelf Fisheries to the Deep Sea is Exhausting Late-Maturing Species that Recover Only Slowly,” Nature 439, 5 January: 29Google Scholar
and (2003), “Rapid Worldwide Depletion of Predatory Fish Communities, Nature 423 15 May: 280–283CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(2005), “Transboundary Spillovers and Decentralization of Environmental Policies,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 50: 82–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1979) and (2005), “The Economics of Governance,” American Economic Review 95(2): 1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2001), “Regulatory Remedies to the Common Pool: The Limits to Oil Field Unitization,” Energy Journal 22(1): 1–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004), “Land Trusts and the Choice to Conserve Land with Full Ownership or Conservation Easements, Natural Resources Journal 44(2): 483–518Google Scholar
(2004), “Viewing Land Conservation through Coase-Colored Glasses,” Natural Resources Journal 44(2): 361–381Google Scholar
and (1995), “Institutions and Economic Performance: Cross-Country Tests Using Alternative Institutional Measures,” Economics and Politics 7: 207–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1998), Determinants of Economic Growth: A Cross-Country Empirical Study, Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
, , , and (2002), “Investor Protection and Corporate Valuation,” Journal of Finance 62: 1147–1165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (2002),“Reversal of Fortune: Geography and Institutions in the Making of the Modern World Income Distribution,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 117(4): 1231–1194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2005), “Unbundling Institutions,” Journal of Political Economy 113(5): 949–995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2011), “The Demarcation of Land and the Role of Coordinating Property Institutions,” Journal of Political Economy 119(3): 426–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (2011), “Large Scale Institutional Changes: Land Demarcation within the British Empire,” Journal of Law and Economics 54(4)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1985), “Oil Field Unitization: Contractual Failure in the Presence of Imperfect Information,” American Economic Review 75(3): 368–385Google Scholar
and (1986), “The Problem of Instream Flows,” Economic Inquiry 24(October) 535–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2012), “Water Rights and Markets in the Semiarid West: Efficiency and Equity Issues,” in and , eds., Property in Land and Other Resources, Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute, 389–411Google Scholar