Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b95js Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-18T13:32:20.038Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Global Transport of Radioactive Materials

from Part I - Transport of Radioactive Materials in the Environment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 August 2019

Edited by
Teruyuki Nakajima ,
Toshimasa Ohara ,
Mitsuo Uematsu  and
Yuichi Onda
Teruyuki Nakajima
Affiliation:
University of Tokyo
Toshimasa Ohara
Affiliation:
National Institute for Environmental Studies, Japan
Mitsuo Uematsu
Affiliation:
University of Tokyo
Yuichi Onda
Affiliation:
University of Tsukuba, Japan
Get access

Summary

The radioactive materials that were released into the atmosphere due to the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station (FDNPS) accident not only spread within Japan but also dispersed over the entire globe through atmospheric flows. As described in Chapter 3, there were strong westerlies and a low pressure that passed over the Tohoku region when the accident occurred, which transported most of the released radioactive materials towards the east in the form of gas and/or aerosol particles. Previous studies on atmospheric trace materials (e.g. Okada et al., 1992; Husar et al., 2001; Uno et al., 2009) have shown that aerosol particles can be transported over long distances. A good example is the air pollution originating over East Asia, such as the Asian dust that arises from the dry land of China and Mongolia, which has been identified in the USA as well as over the Pacific Ocean. Therefore, to understand the entire picture of the radioactive pollution caused by the accident, it is necessary to clarify how the radioactive materials were transported, as well as deposited, over Japan and around the world. The radioactive materials that were produced by the FDNPS accident have been detected throughout the world. To date, numerical simulations of the transport of radioactive materials over large areas have been carried out by various organisations. In this chapter, we will discuss the global transport of the radioactive materials caused by the accident by examining their detection around the world, the characteristics of the atmospheric transport of radioactive materials using global numerical simulations, and estimations of the release of the radioactive materials using observations and numerical simulations.

Type
Chapter
Information
Environmental Contamination from the Fukushima Nuclear Disaster
Dispersion, Monitoring, Mitigation and Lessons Learned
 , pp. 112 - 127
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aoyama, M., Kajino, M., Tanaka, T. Y., et al. (2016). 134Cs and 137Cs in the North Pacific Ocean derived from the March 2011 TEPCO Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Plant accident, Japan. Part two: estimation of 134Cs and 137Cs inventories in the North Pacific Ocean. J. Oceanogr., 72, 67–76, doi:10.1007/s10872-015-0332-2.Google Scholar
Becker, M. (2011). Wind bläst radioaktive Wolke nach Tokio. Spiegel Online, 14 March.Google Scholar
Bowyer, T. W., Biegalski, S. R., Cooper, M., et al. (2011). Elevated radioxenon detected remotely following the Fukushima nuclear accident. J. Environ. Radioact., 102, 681–7, doi:10.1016/j.jenvrad.2011.04.009.Google Scholar
Cabinet Office, Government of Japan (2011). Press conference by the chief cabinet secretary (4 April at 16:02). http://nettv.gov-online.go.jp/eng/prg/prg2065.html (accessed 19 September 2018).Google Scholar
Chino, M., Nakayama, H., Nagai, H., et al. (2011). Preliminary estimation of release amounts of 131I and 137Cs accidentally discharged from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the atmosphere. J. Nucl. Sci. Technol., 48, 1129–34, doi:10.1080/18811248.2011.9711799.Google Scholar
Christoudias, T. and Lelieveld, J. (2013). Modelling the global atmospheric transport and deposition of radionuclides from the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear accident. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 1425–38, doi:10.5194/acp-13-1425-2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christoudias, T., Proestos, Y. and Lelieveld, J. (2014). Global risk from the atmospheric dispersion of radionuclides by nuclear power plant accidents in the coming decades. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 4607–16, doi:10.5194/acp-14-4607-2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization Preparatory Commission (2011). The 11 March Japan disaster. http://bit.ly/2NxZ5W2 (accessed 19 September 2018).Google Scholar
Hsu, S.-C., Huh, C.-A., Chan, C.-Y., et al. (2012). Hemispheric dispersion of radioactive plume laced with fission nuclides from the Fukushima nuclear event. Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, doi:10.1029/2011GL049986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huh, C.-A., Hsu, S.-C. and Lin, C.-Y. (2012). Fukushima-derived fission nuclides monitored around Taiwan: free tropospheric versus boundary layer transport. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 319 -320, 9–14, doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2011.12.004.Google Scholar
Husar, R. B., Tratt, D. M., Schichtel, B. A., et al. (2001). Asian dust events of April 1998. J. Geophys. Res. Atmospheres, 106, 18317–30, doi:10.1029/2000JD900788.Google Scholar
Icelandic Radiation Safety Authority (2011). Summary of radionuclide concentrations in air: March 19th–April 13th, Reykjavik, Iceland. http://bit.ly/2Vxhy83Google Scholar
Japan Meteorological Agency (2011). On WMO GDPFS RSMC on the provision of transport model products for Environmental Emergency Response. www.jma.go.jp/jma/kokusai/kokusai_eer.html (accessed 19 September 2018) (in Japanese).Google Scholar
Katata, G., Chino, M., Kobayashi, T., et al. (2015). Detailed source term estimation of the atmospheric release for the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station accident by coupling simulations of an atmospheric dispersion model with an improved deposition scheme and oceanic dispersion model. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 1029–70, doi:10.5194/acp-15-1029-2015.Google Scholar
Kim, C. K., Byun, J. I., Chae, J. S., et al. (2012). Radiological impact in Korea following the Fukushima nuclear accident. J. Environ. Radioact., 111, 70–82, doi:10.1016/j.jenvrad.2011.10.018.Google Scholar
Kobayashi, T., Nagai, H., Chino, M. and Kawamura, H. (2013). Source term estimation of atmospheric release due to the Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Plant accident by atmospheric and oceanic dispersion simulations. J. Nucl. Sci. Technol., 50, 255–64, doi:10.1080/00223131.2013.772449.Google Scholar
Kristiansen, N. I., Stohl, A. and Wotawa, G. (2012). Atmospheric removal times of the aerosol-bound radionuclides 137Cs and 131I measured after the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear accident: a constraint for air quality and climate models. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 10759–69, doi:10.5194/acp-12-10759-2012.Google Scholar
Kristiansen, N. I., Stohl, A., Olivié, D. J. L., et al. (2016). Evaluation of observed and modelled aerosol lifetimes using radioactive tracers of opportunity and an ensemble of 19 global models. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 3525–61, doi:10.5194/acp-16-3525-2016.Google Scholar
Lelieveld, J., Kunkel, D. and Lawrence, M. G. (2012). Global risk of radioactive fallout after major nuclear reactor accidents. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 4245–58, doi:10.5194/acp-12-4245-2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leon, J. D., Jaffe, D. A., Kaspar, J., et al. (2011). Arrival time and magnitude of airborne fission products from the Fukushima, Japan, reactor incident as measured in Seattle, WA, USA. J. Environ. Radioact., 102, 1032–8, doi:10.1016/j.jenvrad.2011.06.005.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Long, N. Q., Truong, Y., Hien, P. D., et al. (2012). Atmospheric radionuclides from the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear reactor accident observed in Vietnam. J. Environ. Radioact., 111, 53–8, doi:10.1016/j.jenvrad.2011.11.018.Google Scholar
Maki, T. (2015). Emission source estimation by an inverse model. In Contribution of JMA to the WMO Technical Task Team on Meteorological Analyses for Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident and Relevant Atmospheric Transport Modeling at MRI. Tsukuba: Meteorological Research Institute, pp. 150–3.Google Scholar
Masson, O., Baeza, A., Bieringer, J., et al. (2011). Tracking of airborne radionuclides from the damaged Fukushima Dai-Ichi nuclear reactors by European networks. Environ. Sci. Technol., 45 (18), 7670–7, doi:10.1021/es2017158.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Medici, F. (2001). The IMS radionuclide network of the CTBT. Rad. Phys. Chem., 61, 689–90, doi:10.1016/S0969-806X(01)00375-9.Google Scholar
Mészáros, R., Leelőssy, Á., Kovács, T. and Lagzi, I. (2016). Predictability of the dispersion of Fukushima-derived radionuclides and their homogenization in the atmosphere. Sci. Rep., 6, 19915, doi:10.1038/srep19915.Google Scholar
Ohara, T. and Morino, Y. (2012). Current status and issues of the atmospheric transport and deposition models of radioactive substances. In Abstracts of the symposium of the 2012 spring meeting of Meteorological Society of Japan, 2012, 2–8.Google Scholar
Okada, K., Ikegami, M., Uchino, O., et al. (1992). Kuwaiti soot over Japan. Nature, 355, 120.Google Scholar
Philippine Nuclear Research Institute (2011). Fukushima-Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident in Japan. Information Bulletin No. 29 (19 May 2011 update as of 11:00 AM). http://bit.ly/2VmSpMX (accessed 19 September 2018).Google Scholar
Priyadarshi, A., Dominguez, G. and Thiemens, M. H. (2011). Evidence of neutron leakage at the Fukushima nuclear plant from measurements of radioactive 35S in California. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 108, 14422–5, doi:10.1073/pnas.1109449108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sarkar, T., Anand, S., Singh, K. D., et al. (2017). Simulating long range transport of radioactive aerosols using a global aerosol transport model. Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 17, 2631–42, doi:10.4209/aaqr.2017.01.0049.Google Scholar
Saunier, O., Mathieu, A., Didier, D., et al. (2013). An inverse modeling method to assess the source term of the Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant accident using gamma dose rate observations. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 11403–21, doi:10.5194/acp-13-11403-2013.Google Scholar
Sectional Committee on Nuclear Accident Committee on Comprehensive Synthetic Engineering, Science Council of Japan (2014). A review of the model comparison of transportation and deposition of radioactive materials released to the environment as a result of the Tokyo Electric Power Company’s Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident. Report, 2 September.Google Scholar
Stohl, A., Seibert, P., Wotawa, G., et al. (2012). Xenon-133 and caesium-137 releases into the atmosphere from the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant: determination of the source term, atmospheric dispersion, and deposition. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 2313–43, doi:10.5194/acp-12-2313-2012.Google Scholar
Takemura, T., Nakamura, H., Takigawa, M., et al. (2011). A numerical simulation of global transport of atmospheric particles emitted from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant. SOLA, 7, 101–4, doi:10.2151/sola.2011-026.Google Scholar
Tanaka, T. Y., Inomata, Y., Igarashi, Y., et al. (2012). Current status and issues of the atmospheric transport simulation of radioactive materials in Meteorological Research Institute. Tenki, 59, 239–50 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
Ten Hoeve, J. E. and Jacobson, M. Z. (2012). Worldwide health effects of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear accident. Energy Environ. Sci., 5, 8743, doi:10.1039/c2ee22019a.Google Scholar
Terada, H., Katata, G., Chino, M. and Nagai, H. (2012). Atmospheric discharge and dispersion of radionuclides during the Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Plant accident. Part II: verification of the source term and analysis of regional-scale atmospheric dispersion. J. Environ. Radioact., 112, 141–54, doi:10.1016/j.jenvrad.2012.05.023.Google Scholar
Torii, T., Sanada, Y., Sugita, T., et al. (2012). Investigation of radionuclide distribution using aircraft for surrounding environmental survey from Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Plant. JAEA-Technology, 36, doi:10.11484/jaea-technology-2012-036.Google Scholar
Uno, I., Eguchi, K., Yumimoto, K., et al. (2009). Asian dust transported one full circuit around the globe. Nature Geosci., 2, 557–60, doi:10.1038/ngeo583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wetherbee, G. A., Gay, D. A., Debey, T. M., Lehmann, C. M. and Nilles, M. A. (2012). Wet deposition of fission-product isotopes to North America from the Fukushima Dai-ichi incident, March 2011. Environ. Sci. Technol., 46, 2574–82, doi:10.1021/es203217u.Google Scholar
Winiarek, V., Bocquet, M., Saunier, O. and Mathieu, A. (2012). Estimation of errors in the inverse modeling of accidental release of atmospheric pollutant: application to the reconstruction of the cesium-137 and iodine-131 source terms from the Fukushima Daiichi power plant. J. Geophys. Res., 117, doi:10.1029/2011jd016932.Google Scholar
Winiarek, V., Bocquet, M., Duhanyan, N., et al. (2014). Estimation of the caesium-137 source term from the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant using a consistent joint assimilation of air concentration and deposition observations. Atmos. Environ., 82, 268–79, doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.10.017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Meteorological Organization (2011). No. 909: WMO monitoring meteorological conditions in quake-hit area. http://bit.ly/2GMBoIP (accessed 19 September 2018).Google Scholar
Wotawa, G. (2011). Accident in the Japanese NPP Fukushima: spread of radioactivity/first source estimates from CTBTO data show large source terms at the beginning of the accident/weather currently not favourable/low level radioactivity meanwhile observed over U.S. East Coast and Hawaii (update: 22 March 2011 15:00). www.zamg.ac.at/docs/aktuell/Japan2011-03-22_1500_E.pdf (accessed 19 September 2018)Google Scholar
Yonezawa, C. and Yamamoto, Y. (2011). Measurements of artificial radionuclides in the atmosphere by nuclear test monitoring for radioactive nuclides networks. Bunseki, 440, 451–8 (in Japanese).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×