Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T18:16:08.242Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 April 2024

Tomas Maltby  and
Matúš Mišík
Tomas Maltby
Affiliation:
King’s College London
Matúš Mišík
Affiliation:
Comenius University Bratislava, Slovakia
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Energy Transitions in Central and Eastern Europe
The Political Economy of Climate and Energy Policy
 , pp. 177 - 232
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

350.org, 2019. $11 trillion and counting. https://financingthefuture.platform350.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/60/2019/09/FF_11Trillion-WEB.pdfGoogle Scholar
Aalto, P., Nyyssönen, H., Kojo, M., Pal, P., 2017. Russian nuclear energy diplomacy in Finland and Hungary. Eurasian Geogr. Econ. 58, 386–417. https://doi.org/10.1080/15387216.2017.1396905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abdelal, R. E., Tarontsi, S., 2013. Energy Security in Europe (B): The Southern Corridor (No. 711– 033), Harvard Business School Supplement. www.hbs.edu/faculty/Pages/item.aspx?num=39589Google Scholar
Abnett, K., 2022. EU brands Russian gas halt ‘blackmail’, working on response. Reuters, 27 April.Google Scholar
Abnett, K., 2023. EU cut winter gas use 18%, surpassing energy crisis goal. Reuters, 19 April.Google Scholar
Abraham, J., 2017. Just transitions for the miners: labor environmentalism in the Ruhr and Appalachian coalfields. New Polit. Sci. 39, 218–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/07393148.2017.1301313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adenle, A. A., Azadi, H., Arbiol, J., 2015. Global assessment of technological innovation for climate change adaptation and mitigation in developing world. J. Environ. Manage. 161, 261–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.05.040CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Adomaitis, N., Lannin, P., 2012. Baltic states, in EU, fight reliance on Russia gas. Reuters, 5 July.Google Scholar
Afful-Dadzie, A., Mallett, A., Afful-Dadzie, E., 2020. The challenge of energy transition in the Global South: the case of electricity generation planning in Ghana. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 126, 109830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.109830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agencia za enegrijo, 2017. Pomembnejši kazalniki na področju oskrbe z električno energijo in zemeljskim plinom za leto 2016. Ljubljana.Google Scholar
Aklin, M., Urpelainen, J., 2018. Renewables: The Politics of a Global Energy Transition. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aktualita, 2013. Severní Čechy zaplnily nové billboardy CCG. Aktualita. https://web.archive.org/web/20131211062528/www.czechcoal.cz/cs/novinky/aktuality/2013/20130211.htmlGoogle Scholar
Al-Mansour, F., Sucic, B., Pusnik, M., 2014. Challenges and prospects of electricity production from renewable energy sources in Slovenia. Energy 77, 73–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.04.106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ali, S. W., Sadiq, M., Terriche, Y., Naqvi, S. A. R., Hoang, L. Q. N., Mutarraf, M. U., Hassan, M. A., Yang, G., Su, C.-L., Guerrero, J. M., 2021. Offshore wind farm-grid integration: a review on infrastructure, challenges, and grid solutions. IEEE Access 9, 102811–102827. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3098705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ambrose, J., Henley, J., 2019. European Investment Bank to phase out fossil fuel financing. The Guardian, 15 November.Google Scholar
Andersen, S. S., Goldthau, A., Sitter, N., 2017. Energy Union: Europe’s New Liberal Mercantilism? Palgrave Macmillan, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, R. J., 2008. Europe’s Dependence on Russian Natural Gas: Perspectives and Recommendations for a Long-Term Strategy. Garmisch-Partenkirchen.Google Scholar
Andoura, S., Hancher, L., van der Woude, M., 2010. Towards a European Energy Community: A Policy Proposal by Jacques Delors. Brussels.Google Scholar
Andreev, S. A., 2009. The unbearable lightness of membership. Communist Post-Communist Stud. 42, 375–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angel, J., 2016. Strategies of Energy Democracy. Brussels.Google Scholar
Anke, C.-P., Hobbie, H., Schreiber, S., Möst, D., 2020. Coal phase-outs and carbon prices: interactions between EU emission trading and national carbon mitigation policies. Energy Policy 144, 111647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Argüelles, L., Anguelovski, I., Dinnie, E., 2017. Power and privilege in alternative civic practices: examining imaginaries of change and embedded rationalities in community economies. Geoforum 86, 30–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.08.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aslund, A., 2013. How Capitalism Was Built: The Transformation of Central and Eastern Europe, Russia, the Caucasus, and Central Asia. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Augutis, J., Krikštolaitis, R., Pečiulytė, S., Konstantinavičiūtė, I., 2011. Sustainable development and energy security level after Ignalina NPP shutdown. Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ. 17, 5–21. https://doi.org/10.3846/13928619.2011.553930CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austvik, O. G., 2016. The Energy Union and security-of-gas supply. Energy Policy 96, 372–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.06.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
B&S Europe, 2015. Evaluation of PHARE [EU pre-accession] financial assistance to Bulgaria, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia.Google Scholar
Badera, J., Kocoń, P., 2014. Local community opinions regarding the socio-environmental aspects of lignite surface mining: experiences from central Poland. Energy Policy 66, 507–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.11.048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baev, P. K., Øverland, I., 2010. The South Stream versus Nabucco pipeline race: geopolitical and economic (ir)rationales and political stakes in mega-projects. Int. Aff. (Royal Inst. Int. Aff. 1944–) 86, 1075–1090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, L., Newell, P., Phillips, J., 2014. The political economy of energy transitions: the case of South Africa. New Polit. Econ. 19, 791–818. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2013.849674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balmaceda, M. M., 2008. Corruption, intermediary companies, and energy security: Lithuania’s lessons for Central and Eastern Europe. Probl. Post-Communism 55, 16–28. https://doi.org/10.2753/PPC1075-8216550402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balmaceda, M. M., 2013. Politics of Energy Dependency: Ukraine, Belarus, and Lithuania between Domestic Oligarchs and Russian Pressure. University of Toronto Press, Toronto.Google Scholar
Balthasar, A., Schreurs, M. A., Varone, F., 2020. Energy transition in Europe and the United States: policy entrepreneurs and veto players in federalist systems. J. Environ. Dev. 29, 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1070496519887489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baltic Pipe, 2021. Energinet estimates cost of Baltic Pipe delay at 80 million euro. 2 July. www.baltic-pipe.eu/energinet-energinet-estimates-cost-of-baltic-pipe-delay-at-80-million-euro/Google Scholar
Baltic Prime Ministers, 2006. Declaration of the Prime Ministers of Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia on security of supply in the Baltic States and common European energy policy. www.urm.lt/get_file.php?file=L2RhdGEvaHR0cGQvaHRtbC91bXIvbS9tX2ZpbGVzL3dmaWxlcy9maWxlMTM4My5wZGY7RGVrbGFyYWNpamEyMDA2LnBkZjs7Google Scholar
Baltic Times, 2018. Lithuania broke its promise to Latvia over LNG terminal – former ambassador. 20 February.Google Scholar
Balzacq, T., 2005. The three faces of securitization: political agency, audience and context. Eur. J. Int. Relations 11, 171–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066105052960CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balzacq, T., 2010. A theory of securitization: origins, core assumptions, and variants, in: Securitization Theory: How Security Problems Emerge and Dissolve. Routledge, London, pp. 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bankwatch, 2020. Czech Coal Commission likely to approve 2038 as coal phaseout date in key vote tomorrow. Bankwatch, 3 December. https://bankwatch.org/press_release/czech-coal-commission-likely-to-approve-2038-as-coal-phaseout-date-in-key-vote-tomorrowGoogle Scholar
Barber, T., 2018. Bulgaria puts reforms aside to focus on EU presidency. Financial Times, 10 January.Google Scholar
Barigazzi, J., Kijewski, L., 2022. EU’s Russian oil ban stalls as Hungary holds up sanctions. Politico, 8 May.Google Scholar
Barnett, J., Adger, W. N., 2007. Climate change, human security and violent conflict. Polit. Geogr. 26, 639–655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2007.03.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, J., Burningham, K., Walker, G., Cass, N., 2010. Imagined publics and engagement around renewable energy technologies in the UK. Public Underst. Sci. 21, 36–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662510365663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batzella, F., 2018. The Dynamics of EU External Energy Relations: Fighting for Energy. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Batzella, F., 2021. The role of the Commission in intergovernmental agreements in the field of energy: a foot in the door technique? JCMS J. Common Mark. Stud. 59, 745–761. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, M. W., Knill, C., 2012. Understanding policy dismantling: an analytical framework, in: Bauer, M. W., Jordan, A., Green-Pederson, C., Héritier, A. (Eds.), Dismantling Public Policy. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 30–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baun, M., Marek, D., 2013. The New Member States and the European Union: Foreign Policy and Europeanization. Routledge, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauwens, T., Devine-Wright, P., 2018. Positive energies? An empirical study of community energy participation and attitudes to renewable energy. Energy Policy 118, 612–625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.03.062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauwens, T., Gotchev, B., Holstenkamp, L., 2016. What drives the development of community energy in Europe? The case of wind power cooperatives. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 13, 136–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2015.12.016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BBC, 2007. EU rejects Balkans nuclear plea. BBC News, 13 March. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/6445795.stmGoogle Scholar
BBC, 2009. Bulgaria urges return to nuclear. BBC News, 6 January. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7814477.stmGoogle Scholar
BBC, 2011. Italy nuclear: Berlusconi accepts referendum blow. BBC News, 14 June. www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-13741105Google Scholar
BBC, 2012. Bulgaria bans shale gas drilling with ‘fracking’ method. BBC News, 19 January. www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-16626580Google Scholar
BBC, 2022a. Russia to build two nuclear reactors in Hungary. BBC News, 27 August. www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-62695938Google Scholar
BBC, 2022b. Nord Stream 1: how Russia is cutting gas supplies to Europe. BBC News, 29 September. www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-60131520Google Scholar
Beaussier, A.-L., Cabane, L., 2020. Strengthening the EU’s response capacity to health emergencies: insights from EU crisis management mechanisms. Eur. J. Risk Regul. 11, 808–820. https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2020.80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckmann, V., Otto, I. M., Tan, R., 2015. Overcoming the legacy of the past? Analyzing the modes of governance used by the Polish agricultural producer groups. Agric. Econ. (Czech Republic) 61, 222–233. https://doi.org/10.17221/190/2014-AGRICECONCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Béland, D., 2010. Reconsidering policy feedback: how policies affect politics. Adm. Soc. 42, 568–590. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399710377444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, S. E., Braun, Y. A., 2010. Coal, identity, and the gendering of environmental justice activism in central Appalachia. Gend. Soc. 24, 794–813. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243210387277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belyi, A. V., 2019. Stepping on the Gas: Future-Proofing Estonia’s Energy Market and Security. International Centre for Defence and Security, Tallin.Google Scholar
Bento, J. P. C., Szczygiel, N., Moutinho, V., 2017. Fossil fuel power generation and economic growth in Poland. Energy Sources, Part B Econ. Planning, Policy 12, 930–935. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567249.2017.1324536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernardi, L., Morales, L., Lühiste, M., Bischof, D., 2018. The effects of the Fukushima disaster on nuclear energy debates and policies: a two-step comparative examination. Env. Polit. 27, 42–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2017.1383007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernhard, M., 1993. Civil society and democratic transition in East Central Europe. Polit. Sci. Q. 108, 307–326. https://doi.org/10.2307/2152014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bessi, A., Guidolin, M., Manfredi, P., 2021. The role of gas on future perspectives of renewable energy diffusion: bridging technology or lock-in? Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 152, 111673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhatti, J., 2021. Making India energy-independent by 2047: a look at PM Modi’s blueprint Down to Earth, 18 August. www.downtoearth.org.in/blog/energy-efficiency/making-india-energy-independent-by-2047-a-look-at-pm-modi-s-blueprint-78528Google Scholar
Biden, J., 2023. President Biden’s State of the Union Address. www.whitehouse.gov/state-of-the-union-2023/Google Scholar
Binhack, P., Tichý, L., 2012. Asymmetric interdependence in the Czech-Russian energy relations. Energy Policy 45, 54–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.01.027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birchfield, V. L., Duffield, J. S., 2011. Toward a Common European Union Energy Policy: Problems, Progress, and Prospects. Palgrave Macmillan, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blondeel, M., Van de Graaf, T., Haesebrouck, T., 2020. Moving beyond coal: exploring and explaining the Powering Past Coal Alliance. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 59, 101304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.101304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloomberg, 2022. China won’t rush its clean energy transformation, Xi says. Bloomberg, 16 October.Google Scholar
Boasson, E. L., Wettestad, J., 2013. EU Climate Policy: Industry, Policy Interaction and External Environment. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Bocquillon, P., Maltby, T., 2017. The more the merrier? Assessing the impact of enlargement on EU performance in energy and climate change policies. East European Politics 33, 88–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2017.1279605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodenhamer, A., 2016. King coal: a study of mountaintop removal, public discourse, and power in Appalachia. Soc. Nat. Resour. 29, 1139–1153. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2016.1138561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boersma, T., 2015. Energy Security and Natural Gas Markets in Europe: Lessons from the EU and the United States. Routledge, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogdanov, D., Ram, M., Aghahosseini, A., Gulagi, A., Oyewo, A. S., Child, M., Caldera, U., Sadovskaia, K., Farfan, J., De Souza Noel Simas Barbosa, L., Fasihi, M., Khalili, S., Traber, T., Breyer, C., 2021. Low-cost renewable electricity as the key driver of the global energy transition towards sustainability. Energy 227, 120467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.120467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Böhringer, C., 2003. The Kyoto Protocol: a review and perspectives. Oxford Rev. Econ. Policy 19, 451–466. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/19.3.451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonsu, N. O., 2020. Towards a circular and low-carbon economy: insights from the transitioning to electric vehicles and net zero economy. J. Clean. Prod. 256, 120659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boogaerts, A., Portela, C., Drieskens, E., 2016. One swallow does not make spring: a critical juncture perspective on the EU sanctions in response to the Arab Spring. Mediterr. Polit. 21, 205–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/13629395.2015.1125285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borozan, S., Mateska, A. K., Krstevski, P., 2021. Progress of the electricity sectors in South East Europe: challenges and opportunities in achieving compliance with EU energy policy. Energy Reports 7, 8730–8741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2021.11.203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Börzel, T. A., Buzogány, A., 2010. Environmental organisations and the Europeanisation of public policy in Central and Eastern Europe: the case of biodiversity governance. Env. Polit. 19, 708–735. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2010.508302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Börzel, T. A., Buzogány, A., 2019. Compliance with EU environmental law: the iceberg is melting. Env. Polit. 28, 315–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2019.1549772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Börzel, T. A., Risse, T., 2007. Europeanization: the domestic impact of European Union politics, in: Jørgensen, K. E., Pollack, M., Rosamond, B. (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of European Union Politics. SAGE Publications, London, pp. 483–504.Google Scholar
Börzel, T. A., Sedelmeier, U., 2017. Larger and more law abiding? The impact of enlargement on compliance in the European Union. J. Eur. Public Policy 24, 197–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2016.1265575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boute, A., 2022. Weaponizing energy: energy, trade, and investment law in the new geopolitical reality. Am. J. Int. Law 116, 740–751. https://doi.org/10.1017/ajil.2022.53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouzarovski, S., 2009. East-Central Europe’s changing energy landscapes: a place for geography. Area 41, 452–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouzarovski, S., Bassin, M., 2011. Energy and identity: imagining Russia as a hydrocarbon superpower. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 101, 783–794. https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2011.567942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouzarovski, S., Konieczny, M., 2010. Landscapes of paradox: public discourses and policies in Poland’s relationship with the Nord Stream pipeline. Geopolitics 15, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650040903420362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouzarovski, S., Thomson, H., 2019. Transforming Energy Poverty Policies in the European Union: Second Annual Report of the European Union Energy Poverty Observatory. Brussels.Google Scholar
Bouzarovski, S., Tirado Herrero, S., 2015. The energy divide: integrating energy transitions, regional inequalities and poverty trends in the European Union. Eur. Urban Reg. Stud. 24, 69–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776415596449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouzarovski, S., Tirado Herrero, S., 2017. Geographies of injustice: the socio-spatial determinants of energy poverty in Poland, the Czech Republic and Hungary. Post-Communist Econ. 29, 27–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2016.1242257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouzarovski, S., Tirado Herrero, S., Petrova, S., Frankowski, J., Matoušek, R., Maltby, T., 2017. Multiple transformations: theorizing energy vulnerability as a socio-spatial phenomenon. Geogr. Ann. Ser. B, Hum. Geogr. 99, 20–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/04353684.2016.1276733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouzarovski, S., Tirado Herrero, S., Petrova, S., Ürge-Vorsatz, D., 2016. Unpacking the spaces and politics of energy poverty: path-dependencies, deprivation and fuel switching in post-communist Hungary. Local Environ. 21, 1151–1170. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2015.1075480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradshaw, M., 2013. Global Energy Dilemmas. Policy Press, London.Google Scholar
Brar, N., 2015. Need to ensure climate justice, says PM Modi at United Nations. NDTV.com. www.ndtv.com/india-news/need-to-ensure-climate-justice-says-pm-modi-at-united-nations-1223108Google Scholar
Brauers, H., Oei, P.-Y., 2020. The political economy of coal in Poland: drivers and barriers for a shift away from fossil fuels. Energy Policy 144, 111621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brauers, H., Oei, P.-Y., Walk, P., 2020. Comparing coal phase-out pathways: the United Kingdom’s and Germany’s diverging transitions. Environ. Innov. Soc. Transitions 37, 238–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2020.09.001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Braun, M., 2014. EU climate norms in East-Central Europe. JCMS J. Common Mark. Stud. 52, 445–460. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braun, M., 2019. The Czech Republic’s approach to the EU 2030 climate and energy framework. Env. Polit. 28, 1105–1123. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2019.1625139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braungardt, S., van den Bergh, J., Dunlop, T., 2019. Fossil fuel divestment and climate change: reviewing contested arguments. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 50, 191–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.12.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bricout, A., Slade, R., Staffell, I., Halttunen, K., 2022. From the geopolitics of oil and gas to the geopolitics of the energy transition: Is there a role for European supermajors? Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 88, 102634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2022.102634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bridge, G., Bouzarovski, S., Bradshaw, M., Eyre, N., 2013. Geographies of energy transition: space, place and the low-carbon economy. Energy Policy 53, 331–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.10.066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, B., Spiegel, S. J., 2019. Coal, climate justice, and the cultural politics of energy transition. Glob. Environ. Polit. 19, 149–168. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep_a_00501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, S. P. A., Huntington, H. G., 2008. Energy security and climate change protection: Complementarity or tradeoff? Energy Policy 36, 3510–3513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.05.027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brugidou, M., Bouillet, J., 2023. A Return to Grace for Nuclear Power in European Public Opinion? Some Elements of a Rapid Paradigm Shift. Brussels.Google Scholar
Brulle, R. J., Norgaard, K. M., 2019. Avoiding cultural trauma: climate change and social inertia. Env. Polit. 28, 886–908. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2018.1562138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunsden, J., Fleming, S., Khan, M., 2020. EU recovery fund: How the plan will work? Financial Times, 21 July.Google Scholar
Brutschin, E., 2015. Shaping the EU’s energy policy agenda: the role of Eastern European countries, in: Tosun, J., Biesenbender, S., Schulze, K. (Eds.), Energy Policy Making in the EU: Building the Agenda. Springer, London, pp. 187–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6645-0_10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brzozowski, A., 2020. Polish PM: Nord Stream 2 blows up EU energy policy ‘from inside’. Euractiv.com. www.euractiv.com/section/all/short_news/polish-pm-nord-stream-2-blows-up-eu-energy-policy-from-inside/Google Scholar
Bublitz, A., Keles, D., Zimmermann, F., Fraunholz, C., Fichtner, W., 2019. A survey on electricity market design: insights from theory and real-world implementations of capacity remuneration mechanisms. Energy Econ. 80, 1059–1078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2019.01.030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchan, D., 2010. Eastern Europe’s Energy Challenge: Meeting Its EU Climate Commitments (No. EV 55). Oxford.Google Scholar
Buckley, T., 2021. President Xi Jinping’s profound United Nations General Assembly speech. The Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis, 22 September. https://ieefa.org/resources/president-xi-jinpings-profound-united-nations-general-assembly-speechGoogle Scholar
Bulgarian Government, 2008. Bulgarian Energy Strategy by 2020. Draft version. Sofia. www.strategy.bg/FileHandler.ashx?fileId=1436Google Scholar
Bulgarian Government, 2011. National Security Strategy of the Republic of Bulgaria. Sofia. www.me.government.bg/files/useruploads/files/national_strategy1.pdfGoogle Scholar
Bulgarian Government, 2012. Presentation of the Annual Report on the Absorption of EU Funds in the Republic of Bulgaria for 2011. Sofia.Google Scholar
Bulgarian Ministry of Energy, 2011. National Energy Strategy till 2020. Sofia.Google Scholar
Bulgarian National Radio, 2016. Rumen Radev for Le Monde: Bulgaria must not be an enemy to Russia. https://bnr.bg/en/post/100772144Google Scholar
Burke, M. J., 2018. Shared yet contested: energy democracy counter-narratives. Frontiers in Communications, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2018.00022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, M. J., Stephens, J. C., 2018. Political power and renewable energy futures: a critical review. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 35, 78–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.10.018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnham, A., Han, J., Clark, C. E., Wang, M., Dunn, J. B., Palou-Rivera, I., 2012. Life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions of shale gas, natural gas, coal, and petroleum. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46, 619–627. https://doi.org/10.1021/es201942mCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buschmann, P., Oels, A., 2019. The overlooked role of discourse in breaking carbon lock-in: the case of the German energy transition. WIREs Clim. Chang. 10, e574. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bush, G. W., 2006. President Bush’s State of the Union Address. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Business Insider, 2015. Czech Republic to expand brown coal mining program. 19 October.Google Scholar
Butler, E., 2011. The geopolitics of merger and acquisition in the Central European Energy market. Geopolitics 16, 626–654. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2011.520866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, E., 2018. Central and Eastern European energy security: more than Russia, in: Ostrowski, W., Butler, E. (Eds.), Understanding Energy Security in Central and Eastern Europe: Russia, Transition and National Interest. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Buzan, B., Wæver, O., Wilde, J. de, 1998. Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Lynne Rienner, Boulder, CO.Google Scholar
Buzogány, A., 2017. Illiberal democracy in Hungary: Authoritarian diffusion or domestic causation? Democratization 24, 1307–1325. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2017.1328676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buzogány, A., 2021. Beyond Balkan exceptionalism: assessing compliance with EU law in Bulgaria and Romania. Eur. Polit. Soc. 22, 185–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2020.1729048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buzogány, A., Ćetković, S., 2021. Fractionalized but ambitious? Voting on energy and climate policy in the European Parliament. J. Eur. Public Policy 28, 1038–1056. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2021.1918220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buzogány, A., Cotta, B., 2022. Post-accession backsliding and European Union environmental policies. Post-Communist Econ. 34, 647–665. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2021.1965361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caglar, A. E., 2022. Can nuclear energy technology budgets pave the way for a transition toward low-carbon economy? Insights from the United Kingdom. Sustainable Development 31(1), 198–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cahill, B., 2022. EU’s latest sanctions on Russian Oil: What are they and will it work? Energy Post, 14 June. https://energypost.eu/eus-latest-sanctions-on-russian-oil-what-are-they-and-will-it-work/Google Scholar
Calvert, K., 2015. From ‘energy geography’ to ‘energy geographies’: perspectives on a fertile academic borderland. Prog. Hum. Geogr. 40, 105–125. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132514566343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, J. L., 2002. Ideas, politics, and public policy. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 28, 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.141111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capellán-Pérez, I., Johanisova, N., Young, J., Kunze, C., 2020. Is community energy really non-existent in post-socialist Europe? Examining recent trends in 16 countries. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 61, 101348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.101348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CarbonBrief, 2022. Analysis: US falling $32bn short on ‘fair share’ of $100bn climate-finance goal. www.carbonbrief.org/analysis-us-falling-32bn-short-on-fair-share-of-100bn-climate-finance-goal/Google Scholar
Cardoso, A., Turhan, E., 2018. Examining new geographies of coal: dissenting energyscapes in Colombia and Turkey. Appl. Energy 224, 398–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.04.096CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carley, S., Konisky, D. M., 2020. The justice and equity implications of the clean energy transition. Nat. Energy 5, 569–577. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560–020-0641-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carmin, J., Vandeveer, S. D., 2004. Enlarging EU environments: Central and Eastern Europe from transition to accession. Env. Polit. 13, 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010410001685119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castaño-Rosa, R., Solís-Guzmán, J., Rubio-Bellido, C., Marrero, M., 2019. Towards a multiple-indicator approach to energy poverty in the European Union: a review. Energy Build. 193, 36–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.03.039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CEE Bankwatch Network, 2016. Croatia to drop controversial coal plant project, confirms minister. https://bankwatch.org/press_release/croatia-to-drop-controversial-coal-plant-project-confirms-ministerGoogle Scholar
CEE Energy News, 2021. Slovenia: Coal phase-out premature for Chamber of Commerce and Industry. https://ceenergynews.com/electricity/slovenias-chamber-of-commerce-and-industry-believes-that-a-coal-phase-out-by-2033-is-premature/Google Scholar
CEE Energy News, 2022. Lithuania and Latvia discuss acceleration of the Baltics’ power synchronisation. https://ceenergynews.com/electricity/lithuania-and-latvia-discuss-acceleration-of-the-baltics-power-synchronisation/Google Scholar
CEEP, 2018. Cross-Border Energy Cooperation in Central Europe. Central Europe Energy Partners Policy Paper. Brussels.Google Scholar
Cehlár, M., Domaracká, L., Šimko, I., Puzder, M., 2015. Mineral resource extraction and its political risks, in: Majerník, M., Daneshjo, N., Bosák, M. (Eds.), Production Management and Engineering Sciences. CFC Press, London, pp. 39–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Černoch, F., Dančák, B., Koďousková, H., Leschenko, A., Ocelík, P., Osička, J., Šebek, V., Vlček, T., Zapletalová, V., 2012. The Future of the Druzhba Pipeline as a Strategic Challenge for the Czech Republic and Poland. Muni, Brno.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Černoch, F., Lehotský, L., Ocelík, P., Osička, J., Vencourová, Ž., 2019. Anti-fossil frames: examining narratives of the opposition to brown coal mining in the Czech Republic. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 54, 140–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.04.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ćetković, S., Buzogány, A., 2016. Varieties of capitalism and clean energy transitions in the European Union: when renewable energy hits different economic logics. Clim. Policy 16, 642–657. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2015.1135778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ćetković, S., Buzogány, A., 2019. The political economy of EU climate and energy policies in Central and Eastern Europe revisited: shifting coalitions and prospects for clean energy transitions. Polit. Gov. 7, 124–138. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v7i1.1786Google Scholar
Ćetković, S., Buzogány, A., 2020. Between markets, politics and path-dependence: explaining the growth of solar and wind power in six Central and Eastern European countries. Energy Policy 139, 111325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ćetković, S., Hagemann, C., 2020. Changing climate for populists? Examining the influence of radical-right political parties on low-carbon energy transitions in Western Europe. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 66, 101571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaisty, P., Whitefield, S., 2015. Attitudes towards the environment: Are post-Communist societies (still) different? Env. Polit. 24, 598–616. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2015.1023575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chatterton, P., Featherstone, D., Routledge, P., 2013. Articulating climate justice in Copenhagen: antagonism, the commons, and solidarity. Antipode 45, 602–620. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2012.01025.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chemnick, J., 2021. U.S. officially rejoins Paris climate agreement. Scientific American. www.scientificamerican.com/article/u-s-officially-rejoins-paris-climate-agreement/Google Scholar
Chen, C., Yang, Z., Hu, G., 2021. Signalling the cost of intermittency: What is the value of curtailed renewable power? J. Clean. Prod. 302, 126998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Child, M., Kemfert, C., Bogdanov, D., Breyer, C., 2019. Flexible electricity generation, grid exchange and storage for the transition to a 100% renewable energy system in Europe. Renew. Energy 139, 80–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.02.077CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Child, M., Koskinen, O., Linnanen, L., Breyer, C., 2018. Sustainability guardrails for energy scenarios of the global energy transition. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 91, 321–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.03.079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chung, J.-B., Kim, E.-S., 2018. Public perception of energy transition in Korea: nuclear power, climate change, and party preference. Energy Policy 116, 137–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.02.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chyong, C. K., Reiner, D. M., Aggarwal, D., 2023. Market power and long-term gas contracts: the case of Gazprom in Central and Eastern European gas markets. Energy J. 44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cicero, , 2021. Hungary External Review of 2020 Green Bond Allocation Reporting. Oslo.Google Scholar
Cirtautas, A. M., Schimmelfennig, F., 2010. Europeanisation before and after accession: conditionality, legacies and compliance. Eur. Asia. Stud. 62, 421–441. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668131003647812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ciută, F., 2009. Security and the problem of context: a hermeneutical critique of securitisation theory. Rev. Int. Stud. 35, 301–326. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210509008535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ciută, F., 2010. Conceptual notes on energy security: Total or banal security? Secur. Dialogue 41, 123–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, P., 2015. Mark Carney warns investors face ‘huge’ climate change losses. Financial Times, 29 September.Google Scholar
Client Earth, 2019. Huge court win as we block Polish coal-fired power station. Client Earth, 19 June. www.clientearth.org/latest/latest-updates/news/huge-court-win-as-we-block-polish-coal-fired-power-station/Google Scholar
Closson, S., 2009. Russia’s key customer: Europe, in: Perovic, J., Orttung, R. W. (Eds.), Russian Energy Power and Foreign. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Collier, M., 2018. Baltics, Poland vow electricity grids will be synchronized by 2025. eng.lsm.lv, 22 March. https://eng.lsm.lv/article/politics/diplomacy/baltics-poland-vow-electricity-grids-will-be-synchronized-by-2025.a272280/Google Scholar
Collins, J., Osborne, L., 2018. As coal mines shutter, Polish miners seek a way to adjust. DW.com, 6 December.Google Scholar
Cook, A., 2014. Greenpeace protests against Paks II nuclear power plant. Financial Times., 30 January.Google Scholar
Copsey, N., 2009. Parliament and the making of Polish national preferences in the European Union, in: The Global Crisis and the EU Responses: The Perspectives of the SBH Team Presidency. ‘Together for Europe’ Research Centre, Budapest, pp. 218–232.Google Scholar
Copsey, N., Pomorska, K., 2010. Poland’s power and influence in the European Union: the case of its eastern policy. Comp. Eur. Polit. 8, 304–326. https://doi.org/10.1057/cep.2009.3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copsey, N., Pomorska, K., 2014. The influence of newer member states in the European Union: the case of Poland and the Eastern Partnership. Eur. Asia. Stud. 66, 421–443. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2013.855391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corner, A., Venables, D., Spence, A., Poortinga, W., Demski, C., Pidgeon, N., 2011. Nuclear power, climate change and energy security: exploring British public attitudes. Energy Policy 39, 4823–4833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.06.037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Correljé, A., van der Linde, C., 2006. Energy supply security and geopolitics: a European perspective. Energy Policy 34, 532–543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2005.11.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corry, O., 2011. Securitisation and ‘riskification’: second-order security and the politics of climate change. Millennium 40, 235–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829811419444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Council of the EU, 1964. Protocol of Agreement on Energy Problems, Official Journal 069: 1099–1100. Brussels.Google Scholar
Council of the EU, 2006a. Proposal for a European Energy Security Treaty Information by the Polish Delegation. Brussels.Google Scholar
Council of the EU, 2006b. Council Conclusions: ‘A New Energy Policy for Europe’ Contribution of the Energy Ministers to the 2006 Spring European Council. Brussels.Google Scholar
Council of the EU, 2008. Energy and Climate Change: Elements of the Final Compromise. Brussels.Google Scholar
Council of the EU, 2009. Presidency Conclusions 19/20 March 2009. Brussels.Google Scholar
Council of the EU, 2014. A Policy Framework for Climate and Energy in the Period from 2020 to 2030. Brussels.Google Scholar
Council of the EU, 2016. Outcome of the Council meeting. 3472nd Council meeting. Transport, Telecommunications and Energy. Brussels.Google Scholar
Council of the EU, 2018. Silesia Declaration on Solidarity and Just Transition. Brussels.Google Scholar
Council of the EU, 2022a. Council Regulation (EU) 2022/1369 of 5 August 2022 on Coordinated Demand-Reduction Measures for Gas. Brussels.Google Scholar
Council of the EU, 2022b. Member States Commit to Reducing Gas Demand by 15% Next Winter. Brussels.Google Scholar
Cousse, J., 2021. Still in love with solar energy? Installation size, affect, and the social acceptance of renewable energy technologies. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 145, 111107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cousse, J., Wüstenhagen, R., Schneider, N., 2020. Mixed feelings on wind energy: affective imagery and local concern driving social acceptance in Switzerland. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 70, 101676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Creamer, E., Eadson, W., van Veelen, B., Pinker, A., Tingey, M., Braunholtz-Speight, T., Markantoni, M., Foden, M., Lacey-Barnacle, M., 2018. Community energy: entanglements of community, state, and private sector. Geogr. Compass 12, e12378. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crippa, M., Guizzardi, D., Banja, M., Solazzo, E., Muntean, M., Schaaf, E., Pagani, F., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Olivier, J. G. J., Quadrelli, R., Risquez Martin, A., Taghavi-Moharamli, P., Grassi, G., Rossi, S., Oom, D., Branco, A., San-Miguel, J., Vignati, E., 2022. CO2 Emissions of All World Countries. Joint Research Centre, Luxembourg. https://doi.org/10.2760/07904Google Scholar
Crisp, J., 2015. Joint gas buying on EU leaders’ summit agenda. Euractiv, 4 March. www.euractiv.com/section/climate-environment/news/joint-gas-buying-on-eu-leaders-summit-agenda/Google Scholar
Crnčec, D., Penca, J., Lovec, M., 2023. The COVID-19 pandemic and the EU: From a sustainable energy transition to a green transition? Energy Policy 175, 113453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crnčec, D., Sučić, B., Merše, S., 2021. Slovenia: drivers and challenges of energy transition to climate neutrality, in: Mišík, M., Oravcová, V. (Eds.), From Economic to Energy Transition: Three Decades of Transitions in Central and Eastern Europe. Springer International, Cham, pp. 247–282. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55085-1_9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croatian Government, 2017. National Security Strategy. Zagreb.Google Scholar
Croatian Government, 2009. Energy Strategy of the Republic of Croatia. Zagreb.Google Scholar
Csereklyei, Z., 2014. Measuring the impact of nuclear accidents on energy policy. Ecol. Econ. 99, 121–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.01.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cui, R. Y., Hultman, N., Cui, D., McJeon, H., Yu, S., Edwards, M. R., Sen, A., Song, K., Bowman, C., Clarke, L., Kang, J., Lou, J., Yang, F., Yuan, J., Zhang, W., Zhu, M., 2021. A plant-by-plant strategy for high-ambition coal power phaseout in China. Nat. Commun. 12, 1468. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467–021-21786-0CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Culley, M. R., Ogley-Oliver, E., Carton, A. D., Street, J. C., 2010. Media framing of proposed nuclear reactors: an analysis of print media. J. Community Appl. Soc. Psychol. 20, 497–512. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.1056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Czech Government, 2003. Security Strategy. Prague.Google Scholar
Dąbrowski, M., 2012. Shallow or deep Europeanisation? The uneven impact of EU Cohesion policy on the regional and local authorities in Poland. Environ. Plan. C Gov. Policy 30, 730–745. https://doi.org/10.1068/c1164rCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daigneault, P.-M., 2014. Reassessing the concept of policy paradigm: aligning ontology and methodology in policy studies. J. Eur. Public Policy 21, 453–469. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2013.834071CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dannreuther, R., 2013. Geopolitics and international relations of resources, in: Dannreuther, R., Ostrowski, W. (Eds.), Global Resources: Conflict and Cooperation. Palgrave Macmillan UK, London, pp. 79–97. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137349149_5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dannreuther, R., 2015. Energy security and shifting modes of governance. Int. Polit. 52, 466–483. https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2015.4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dasandi, N., Graham, H., Lampard, P., Jankin Mikhaylov, S., 2021. Engagement with health in national climate change commitments under the Paris Agreement: a global mixed-methods analysis of the nationally determined contributions. Lancet Planet. Heal. 5, e93–e101. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542–5196(20)30302-8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dastan, S. A., 2018. Negotiation of a cross-border natural gas pipeline: an analytical contribution to the discussions on Turkish Stream. Energy Policy 120, 749–760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.03.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidescu, S., Hiteva, R., Maltby, T., 2018. Two steps forward, one step back: renewable energy transitions in Bulgaria and Romania. Public Adm. 96, 611–625. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, R., 2022. National Grid asks UK coal power plants to be on standby this winter. The Guardian, 28 July.Google Scholar
de Almeida, L., 2019. SoS back-and-forth? Minimum v. exhaustive harmonization of the right to be protected customers in gas supply crises: Eni and Others. Eur. Energy Environ. Law Rev. 20, 92–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Hauteclocque, A., Conti, I., Glachant, J. M., 2015. From a Reactive to a Proactive EU Regulatory Framework for Long-Term Gas Import Contracts. Florence School of Regulation, Florence.Google Scholar
de la Porte, C., Jensen, M. D., 2021. The next generation EU: an analysis of the dimensions of conflict behind the deal. Soc. Policy Adm. 55, 388–402. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dekanozishvili, M., 2023. Dynamics of EU Renewable Energy Policy Integration. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Detraz, N., Betsill, M. M., 2009. Climate change and environmental security: for whom the discourse shifts. Int. Stud. Perspect. 10, 303–320. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-3585.2009.00378.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deutch, J., 2020. Is net zero carbon 2050 possible? Joule 4, 2237–2240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2020.09.002CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deutsche Welle, 2006. Poland hits out at Germany over gas partnership with Russia. DW.com, 1 May. www.dw-world.de/dw/article/0,,1986869,00.htmlGoogle Scholar
Díaz, P., Van Vliet, O., Patt, A., 2017. Do we need gas as a bridging fuel? A case study of the electricity system of Switzerland. Energies 10, 861. https://doi.org/10.3390/en10070861CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diez, T., von Lucke, F., Wellmann, Z., 2016. The Securitisation of Climate Change: Actors, Processes and Consequences. Routledge, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dimitrova, A., 2002. Enlargement, institution-building and the EU’s administrative capacity requirement. West Eur. Polit. 25, 171–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/713601647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dimitrova, A., Buzogány, A., 2014. Post-accession policy-making in Bulgaria and Romania: Can non-state actors use EU rules to promote better governance? JCMS 52, 139–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12084Google Scholar
Dimitrova, A., Toshkov, D., 2009. Post-accession compliance between administrative co-ordination and political bargaining. Eur. Integr. – Online Pap. 13, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1695/2009019Google Scholar
Dimitrova, M., 2020. Krizevci is a convincing champion of EU funds and a pioneer in the transition to green energy. The Mayor.eu, 19 October. www.themayor.eu/en/a/view/krizevci-is-a-convincing-champion-of-eu-funds-and-a-pioneer-in-the-transition-to-green-energy-6152Google Scholar
Dinan, D., 2014. Europe Recast: A History of European Union. Palgrave Macmillan, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dogan, E., Chishti, M. Z., Karimi Alavijeh, N., Tzeremes, P., 2022. The roles of technology and Kyoto Protocol in energy transition towards COP26 targets: evidence from the novel GMM-PVAR approach for G-7 countries. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 181, 121756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
dpa, 2022. Czech Republic and Slovakia demand EU green label for nuclear energy. dpa.com, 11 January. https://energycentral.com/news/czech-republic-and-slovakia-demand-eu-green-label-nuclear-energy-0Google Scholar
Dubois, U., Saplacan, R., 2010. Public service perspectives on reforms of electricity distribution and supply: a modular analysis. Ann. Public Coop. Econ. 81, 313–356. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8292.2010.00413.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunlap, R. E., 2013. Climate change skepticism and denial: an introduction. Am. Behav. Sci. 57, 691–698. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213477097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dupont, C., 2016. Climate Policy Integration into EU Energy Policy: Progress and Prospects. Routledge, London. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315751665Google Scholar
Dupont, C., Oberthür, S., 2015. Decarbonization in the European Union: Internal Policies and External Strategies. Springer, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dutkevičová, T., 2013. Energy self-sufficient village Kněžice. 100% communities. www.100-res-communities.eu/national_leagues/clu_czec/best-practices/energy-self-sufficient-village-kneziceGoogle Scholar
Dutta, S., 2020. India’s green energy plan makes $20 billion business sense: PM Modi. Times of India, 27 November.Google Scholar
DW, 2011. Belgium aims to phase out nuclear power by 2025. DW.com, 31 October. www.dw.com/en/belgium-aims-to-phase-out-nuclear-power-by-2025/a-15500989Google Scholar
Dytrych, S., 2020. Komunitní energetika českou vládu nezajímá. Pro-Energy.Google Scholar
Easton, A., 2021. Turow: vast Polish coal mine infuriates the neighbours. BBC.com. www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-57484009Google Scholar
Eastring, 2018. The presentation of the feasibility study. Eastring, 20 September. www.eastring.eu/page.php?page=news&year=2018Google Scholar
EBRD, 2021. Bohunice International Decommissioning Support Fund. EBRD. www.ebrd.com/what-we-do/sectors/nuclear-safety/bohunice.htmlGoogle Scholar
ECA, 2017. EU Must Cut Emissions and also Adapt to Climate Change, Warn Auditors. Luxembourg.Google Scholar
ECA, 2022a. EU Support for Coal Regions Achieved Little for Climate Transition. Luxembourg.Google Scholar
ECA, 2022b. Energy Taxation, Carbon Pricing and Energy Subsidies. Luxembourg.Google Scholar
ECJ, 2019. The General Court Annuls the Commission Decision Approving the Modification of the Exemption Regime for the Operation of the OPAL Gas Pipeline. Luxembourg.Google Scholar
EEA, 2022. Greenhouse gas emission intensity of electricity generation in Europe. EEA, 2 June. www.eea.europa.eu/en/analysis/indicators/greenhouse-gas-emission-intensity-of-1Google Scholar
Egenhofer, C., Alessi, M., Georgiev, A., Fujiwara, N., 2011. The EU Emissions Trading System and Climate Policy towards 2050: Real Incentives to Reduce Emissions and Drive Innovation? Brussels.Google Scholar
EIA, 2018. Petroleum and Other Liquids. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
EIA, 2022. Country Analysis Executive Summary: China. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Eicke, L., Weko, S., Apergi, M., Marian, A., 2021. Pulling up the carbon ladder? Decarbonization, dependence, and third-country risks from the European carbon border adjustment mechanism. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 80, 102240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eikeland, P. O., 2011. The Third Internal Energy Market Package: New power relations among member states, EU institutions and non-state actors? J. Common Mark. Stud. 49, 243–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02140.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
EJAtlas, 2016. Plomin Power Station Unit C, Croatia. https://ejatlas.org/print/plomin-power-station-unit-c-croatiaGoogle Scholar
EJAtlas, 2018. Gubin Brody lignite mine, Poland. https://ejatlas.org/conflict/the-gubin-brody-lignite-mine-polandGoogle Scholar
EJAtlas, 2019a. Wind farm licensing cases. https://ejatlas.org/conflict/public-participation-in-a-windfarm-licensing-caseGoogle Scholar
EJAtlas, 2019b. Pungesti’s resistance to Chevron gas fracking. Global Atlas of Environmental Justice. https://ejatlas.org/conflict/resistance-to-shale-gas-frackingGoogle Scholar
Elliott, D., 2013. Fukushima: Impacts and Implications. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emmerich, P., Hülemeier, A.-G., Jendryczko, D., Baumann, M. J., Weil, M., Baur, D., 2020. Public acceptance of emerging energy technologies in context of the German energy transition. Energy Policy 142, 111516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emodi, N. V., Okereke, C., Abam, F. I., Diemuodeke, O. E., Owebor, K., Nnamani, U. A., 2022. Transport sector decarbonisation in the Global South: a systematic literature review. Energy Strateg. Rev. 43, 100925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2022.100925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Energy Bulletin, 2005. Former Secretary of Defense testifies before Senate on peak oil. www2.energybulletin.net/node/11014Google Scholar
Energy Cities EU, 2020. Crowd investing for solar roofs in Križevci. https://energy-cities.eu/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Krizevci_crowdfunding-solarPV_2020_en.pdfGoogle Scholar
Energy Regulators, 2010. National Report Bulgaria. www.csd.bg/artShow.php?id1⁄415199Google Scholar
Energy Briefing, 2019. Eastring gone wild. https://energy-europe.eu/economy/eastring-gone-wild/Google Scholar
Energy Reporters, 2019. Poland’s top court blocks coal plant. www.energy-reporters.com/environment/polands-top-court-blocks-coal-plant/Google Scholar
ENTSOG, 2021. Union-Wide Simulation of Gas Supply and Infrastructure Disruption Scenarios (SoS Simulation). Brussels.Google Scholar
Epstein, R. A., Jacoby, W., 2014. Eastern enlargement ten years on: Transcending the East-West divide? J. Common Mark. Stud. 52, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12089CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ERR, 2022. Latvia to initially join Paldiski LNG terminal. news.err.ee. https://news.err.ee/1608571222/latvia-to-initially-join-paldiski-lng-terminalGoogle Scholar
Escribano, G., González-Enríquez, C., Lázaro-Touza, L., Paredes-Gázquez, J., 2023. An energy union without interconnections? Public acceptance of cross-border interconnectors in four European countries. Energy 266, 126385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.126385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Estonian Government, 2017. National Defence Strategy. Tallin.Google Scholar
EU Business, 2010. Russia, Poland gas deal ‘in line with EU law’. www.eubusiness.com/news-eu/poland-russia-gas.6tjGoogle Scholar
Euracoal, 2022. Poland. https://euracoal.eu/info/country-profiles/poland/Google Scholar
Euractiv, 2008. Eight EU states oppose unbundling, table ‘third way’. www.euractiv.com/section/energy/news/eight-eu-states-oppose-unbundling-table-third-way/Google Scholar
Euractiv, 2010. Commission urges Bulgaria to change Gazprom clause. www.euractiv.com/section/energy/news/commission-urges-bulgaria-to-change-gazprom-clause/Google Scholar
Euractiv, 2012. Poland Blocks EU’s Zero-Carbon Plan. www.euractiv.com/section/climate-environment/news/poland-blocks-eu-s-zero-carbon-plan/Google Scholar
Euractiv, 2014. Finland and Estonia to build LNG terminals. www.euractiv.com/section/energy/news/finland-and-estonia-to-build-lng-terminals/Google Scholar
Euractiv, 2015. Hungary says EU authorised its nuclear fuel supply deal with Russia. www.euractiv.com/section/energy/news/hungary-says-eu-authorised-its-nuclear-fuel-supply-deal-with-russia/Google Scholar
Euractiv, 2022. Germany takes firm pro-gas stance in green taxonomy feedback to EU. www.euractiv.com/section/energy-environment/news/germany-takes-firm-pro-gas-stance-in-green-taxonomy-feedback-to-eu/Google Scholar
Euractiv, 2023. Polish parliament votes 700 metre rule for wind turbines. www.euractiv.com/section/energy-environment/news/polish-parliament-votes-700-metre-rule-for-wind-turbines/Google Scholar
Euratom, 1957. Consolidated Version of the Treaty Establishing the European Atomic Energy Community. Brussels.Google Scholar
EurObserv’ER, 2023. 21st annual overview barometer, 28 February. www.eurobserv-er.org/21st-annual-overview-barometer/Google Scholar
Eurofound, 2019. Future of Manufacturing: Energy Scenario: Employment Implications of the Paris Climate Agreement. Luxembourg.Google Scholar
Euronews, 2022. EU embargo on Russian coal comes into force. www.euronews.com/my-europe/2022/08/11/eu-embargo-on-russian-coal-comes-into-forceGoogle Scholar
European Commission, 1968. First Guidelines for a Community Energy Policy: Memorandum Presented by the Commission to the Council, Bulletin of the European Communities, Supplement to No. 12-1968, COM (68) 1040 Final. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Commission, 1995. For a European Union Energy Policy. Green Paper. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Commission, 1997. Agenda 2000: Commission Opinion on Romania’s Application for Membership of the European Union. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Commission, 2005. The Attitudes of European Citizens towards Environment: Special Eurobarometer 217. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Commission, 2006. Green Paper: A European Strategy for Sustainable, Competitive and Secure Energy. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Commission, 2007. An Energy Policy for Europe. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Commission, 2008a. Special Eurobarometer 295 Attitudes of European Citizens towards the Environment. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Commission, 2008b. Second Strategic Energy Review. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Commission, 2009a. The January 2009 Gas Supply Disruption to the EU: An Assessment. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Commission, 2009b. Ex-post Evaluation of the Trans-European Energy Networks (TEN-E) Funding Programme 2000–2006. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Commission, 2010a. Energy Infrastructure Priorities for 2020 and Beyond. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Commission, 2010b. Economic Recovery: Second Batch of 4-Billion-Euro Package Goes to 43 Pipeline and Electricity Projects. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Commission, 2011a. Energy Roadmap 2050 Impact Assessment Part 1 Including Part I of Annex 1 Scenarios: Assumptions and Results. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Commission, 2011b. A Roadmap for Moving to a Competitive Low Carbon Economy in 2050. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Commission, 2012. Connecting Europe: The Energy Infrastructure for Tomorrow. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Commission, 2013a. Member State’s Energy Dependence: An Indicator-Based Assessment. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Commission, 2013b. On the Implementation of the European Energy Programme for Recovery. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Commission, 2013c. Green Paper 2030: Main Outcomes of the Public Consultation. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Commission, 2013d. Green Paper: A 2030 Framework for Climate and Energy Policies. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Commission, 2014a. In-Depth Study of European Energy Security. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Commission, 2014b. European Energy Security Strategy. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Commission, 2014c. Report on the Implementation of Regulation (EU) 994/2010 and Its Contribution to Solidarity and Preparedness for Gas Disruptions in the EU. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Commission, 2014d. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the Short Term Resilience of the European Gas System. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Commission, 2014e. Report on the Findings of the Baltics and Finland Focus Group. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Commission, 2015a. A Framework Strategy for a Resilient Energy Union with a Forward-Looking Climate Change Policy 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Commission, 2015b. Energy Poverty and Vulnerable Consumers in the Energy Sector across the EU: Analysis of Policies and Measures. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Commission, 2015c. Antitrust: Commission Sends Statement of Objections to Gazprom for Alleged Abuse of Dominance on Central and Eastern European Gas Supply Markets. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Commission, 2015d. End of Energy Isolation in the Baltics: How the Gas Interconnector Poland-Lithuania (GIPL) Works. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Commission, 2015e. First Gas Interconnector between Poland and Lithuania Ends Energy Isolation of the Baltic States. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Commission, 2015f. Special Eurobarometer 435, Climate Change. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Commission, 2015g. Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/89 of 18 November 2015 Amending Regulation (EU) No 347/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council as Regards the Union List of Projects of Common Interest. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Commission, 2016a. Report on the Application of the Decision 994/2012/EU Establishing an Information Exchange Mechanism on Intergovernmental Agreements between Member States and Third Countries in the Field of Energy. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Commission, 2016b. Commission Decision of 28.10.2016 on Review of the Exemption of the Ostseepipeline-Anbindungsleitung from the Requirements on Third Party Access and Tariff Regulation Granted under Directive 2003/55/EC. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Commission, 2017a. State Aid: Commission Clears Investment in Construction of Paks II Nuclear Power Plant in Hungary. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Commission, 2017b. Special Eurobarometer 459, September 2017: Climate Change. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Commission, 2017c. European Unconventional Oil and Gas Assessment. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Commission, 2017d. Indicators for Monitoring Progress towards Energy Union Objectives: A Fully Integrated Internal Energy Market, Wholesale Market Functioning. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Commission, 2018a. Launch of the EU Energy Poverty Observatory (EPOV). https://ec.europa.eu/energy/en/events/launch-eu-energy-poverty-observatory-epovGoogle Scholar
European Commission, 2018b. Data on the Budgetary and Technical Implementation of the European Energy Programme for Recovery. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Commission, 2018c. Nuclear Safety and Decommissioning. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Commission, 2018d. Electricity Directive: Options on Regulated Prices, Energy Poverty and Vulnerable Customers: A Non-paper from the Commission. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Commission, 2019a. The European Green Deal. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Commission, 2019b. Extension of Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) Terminal: Increasing Poland and EU’s Energy Security. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Commission, 2019c. Energy Union: EU Invests to Upgrade Polish Liquefied Natural Gas Terminal in Świnoujście. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Commission, 2019d. State Aid: Commission Approves Public Support for Croatian LNG Terminal at Krk Island. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Commission, 2019e. Special Eurobarometer 490 Summary Climate Change Survey Requested by the European Commission. Brussels. https://doi.org/10.2834/00469Google Scholar
European Commission, 2019f. RE:START: Strategy for Economic Restructuring of Czech Coal Regions. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Commission, 2020a. On the Implementation of the European Energy Programme for Recovery and the European Energy Efficiency Fund. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Commission, 2020b. 2020 Report on the State of the Energy Union Pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2018/1999 on Governance of the Energy Union and Climate Action. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Commission, 2020c. An EU-Wide Assessment of National Energy and Climate Plans. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Commission, 2020d. Assessment of the Final National Energy and Climate Plan of Czechia. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Commission, 2020e. Assessment of the Final National Energy and Climate Plan of Poland. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Commission, 2020f. Assessment of the Final National Energy and Climate Plan of Hungary. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Commission, 2020g. Assessment of the Final National Energy and Climate Plan of Romania. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Commission, 2020h. Assessment of the Final National Energy and Climate Plan of Slovakia. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Commission, 2020i. Assessment of the Final National Energy and Climate Plan of Slovenia. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Commission, 2020j. Baltic States and Poland Sign €720 Million Grant Agreement for the Baltic Synchronisation Project. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Commission, 2020k. Gas Interconnector Poland-Lithuania: Works in Progress.Google Scholar
European Commission, 2020l. Executite Summary of Poland’s National Energy and Climate Pland for the Years, 2021–2030. Warsaw.Google Scholar
European Commission, 2020m. European Semester 2020: 2020 Country Reports Annexes D. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Commission, 2020n. ‘Indicators and Data’, EU Energy Poverty Observatory. https://energy-poverty.ec.europa.eu/observing-energy-poverty/national-indicators_enGoogle Scholar
European Commission, 2021a. From Where Do We Import Energy? https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/cache/infographs/energy/bloc-2c.htmlGoogle Scholar
European Commission, 2021b. European Green Deal: Commission Proposes Transformation of EU Economy and Society to Meet Climate Ambitions. https://transport.ec.europa.eu/news-events/news/european-green-deal-commission-proposes-transformation-eu-economy-and-society-meet-climate-ambitions-2021-07-14_enGoogle Scholar
European Commission, 2021c. Data on the Budgetary and Technical Implementation of the European Energy Programme for Recovery. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Commission, 2021d. Funding for PCIs. https://energy.ec.europa.eu/topics/infrastructure/projects-common-interest/funding-projects-common-interest_enGoogle Scholar
European Commission, 2021e. Special Eurobarometer 513 Climate Change. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Commission, 2021f. Commission Proposes New EU Framework to Decarbonise Gas Markets, Promote Hydrogen and Reduce Methane Emissions. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Commission, 2021g. Annex VII to Regulation (EU) No 347/2013. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Commission, 2022a. REPowerEU: Joint European Action for More Affordable, Secure and Sustainable Energy. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Commission, 2022b. Save Gas for a Safe Winter. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Commission, 2022c. EU Emission Trading System. https://climate.ec.europa.eu/eu-action/eu-emissions-trading-system-eu-ets_enGoogle Scholar
European Commission, 2022d. Modernisation Fund. https://ec.europa.eu/clima/eu-action/funding-climate-action/modernisation-fund_enGoogle Scholar
European Commission, 2022e. What Is the Innovation Fund? https://ec.europa.eu/clima/eu-action/funding-climate-action/innovation-fund/policy-development_enGoogle Scholar
European Commission, 2022f. NER 300 Programme. https://ec.europa.eu/clima/eu-action/funding-climate-action/ner-300-programme_enGoogle Scholar
European Commission, 2022g. Innovation Fund Progress Report. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Commission, 2022h. Third Call for Large-Scale Projects. https://climate.ec.europa.eu/eu-action/eu-funding-climate-action/innovation-fund/calls-proposals/large-scale-calls_enGoogle Scholar
European Commission, 2022i. EU Energy in Figures: Statistical Pocketbook 2022. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Commission, 2022j. Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/564. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Commission, 2022k. The Just Transition Mechanism: Making Sure No One Is Left Behind. https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/priorities-2019-2024/european-green-deal/finance-and-green-deal/just-transition-mechanism_enGoogle Scholar
European Commission, 2022l. The Just Transition Fund. https://commission.europa.eu/funding-tenders/find-funding/eu-funding-programmes/just-transition-fund_enGoogle Scholar
European Commission, 2022m. Flash Eurobarometer 514: EU’s Response to the Energy Challenges. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Commission, 2022n. Energy Emergency: Preparing, Purchasing and Protecting the EU Together. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Commission, 2023a. Energy Union Indicators Webtool. https://energy.ec.europa.eu/data-and-analysis/energy-union-indicators-webtool_enGoogle Scholar
European Commission, 2023b. European Climate Infrastructure and Environment Executive Agency. https://cinea.ec.europa.eu/programmes/life_en#life2014Google Scholar
European Commission, 2023c. Coal Regions in Transition. https://energy.ec.europa.eu/topics/oil-gas-and-coal/eu-coal-regions/initiative-coal-regions-transition_enGoogle Scholar
European Commission, 2023d. Energy Prices and Costs in Europe.Google Scholar
European Commission, 2023e. Quarterly Report on European Gas Markets with Focus on Price Developments in 2022. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Commission, 2023f. New Reports Highlight 3rd Quarter Impact of Gas Supply Cuts. https://energy.ec.europa.eu/news/new-reports-highlight-3rd-quarter-impact-gas-supply-cuts-2023-01-13_enGoogle Scholar
European Community, 1986. Single European Act. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Council, 2003. European Security Strategy. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Council, 2007. Council Conclusions, March 2007. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Council, 2008. European Council Conclusions, December 2008. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Council, 2014. European Council (23 and 24 October 2014) ‒ Conclusions. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Council, 2016. Shared Vision, Common Action: A Stronger Europe. A Global Strategy for the European Union’s Foreign and Security Policy. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Council, 2019a. European Council Meeting (12 December 2019) – Conclusions. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Council, 2019b. European Council Meeting (20 June 2019) – Conclusions. www.consilium.europa.eu/media/39922/20-21-euco-final-conclusions-en.pdfGoogle Scholar
European Council, 2022a. European Council Meeting (24 and 25 March 2022) – Conclusions. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Council, 2022b. European Council Meeting (20 and 21 October 2022) – Conclusions. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Court of Auditors, 2016. EU Nuclear Decommissioning Assistance Programmes in Lithuania, Bulgaria and Slovakia: Some Progress Made since 2011, but Critical Challenges Ahead. Luxembourg.Google Scholar
European Court of Auditors, 2022. EU Support to Coal Regions: Limited Focus on Socio-economic and Energy Transition. Luxembourg.Google Scholar
European Investment Bank, 2023. Investment Report 2022/23 Key Findings. Luxembourg.Google Scholar
European Parliament, 2016. Reasoned Opinion of the National Parliament of the Republic of Bulgaria on the Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council Concerning Measures to Safeguard the Security of Gas Supply and Repealing Regulation (EU) No 994/2010. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Parliament, 2021a. Inrternal Energy Market. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Parliament, 2021b. Financing the Trans-European Networks. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Parliament, 2022. EU Recovery Instrument. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Parliament and the Council, 2009a. Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the Promotion of the Use of Energy from Renewable Sources. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Parliament and the Council, 2009b. Directive 2009/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 Amending Directive 2003/87/EC so as to Improve and Extend the Greenhouse Gas Emission Allowance Trading Scheme of the Community. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Parliament and the Council, 2009c. Regulation (EC) No 663/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 Establishing a Programme to Aid Economic Recovery by Granting Community Financial Assistance to Projects in the Field of Energy. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Parliament and the Council, 2013. Regulation (EU) No 347/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 April 2013 on Guidelines for Trans-European Energy Infrastructure. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Parliament and the Council, 2018. Directive (EU) 2018/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 on the Ppromotion of the Use of Energy from Renewable Sources. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Parliament and the Council, 2021a. Regulation (EU) 2021/241 of 12 February 2021 Establishing the Recovery and Resilience Facility. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Parliament and the Council, 2021b. European Climate Law. Brussels.Google Scholar
European Parliament and the Council, 2021c. Regulation (EU) 2021/1056 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 June 2021 Establishing the Just Transition Fund. Brussels.Google Scholar
Europolitics, 2008. MEPs squabble over Nord Stream pipeline. Europolitics. www.europolitics.info/meps-squabble-over-nord-stream-pipeline-artr147856-10.htmlGoogle Scholar
Eurostat, 2021. Energy Statistical Country Data Sheet. Brussels.Google Scholar
Eurostat, 2022a. Renewable energy statistics. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Renewable_energy_statisticsGoogle Scholar
Eurostat, 2022b. Energy production and imports. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Energy_production_and_importsGoogle Scholar
Eurostat, 2022c. Energy production and imports, January 2022. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Energy_production_and_importsGoogle Scholar
Eurostat, 2023a. EU energy mix and import dependency. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostat-news/-/edn-20220209-1Google Scholar
Eurostat, 2023b. Share of renewable energy more than doubled between 2004 and 2021. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Renewable_energy_statistics#Share_of_renewable_energy_more_than_doubled_between_2004_and_2021Google Scholar
Eurostat, 2023c. Share of energy from renewable sources. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/NRG_IND_REN__custom_5097043/default/table?lang=enGoogle Scholar
Eurostat, 2023d. Greenhouse gas emissions by source sector (source: EEA). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/cache/metadata/en/env_air_gge_esms.htmGoogle Scholar
Eurostat, 2023e. Annual inflation down to 6.9% in the euro area. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/2995521/16324910/2-19042023-AP-EN.pdf/ff3d6b28-9c8f-41cd-714f-d1fd38af0b15Google Scholar
Eurostat, 2023f. EU gas consumption decreased by 19%. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostat-news/w/DDN-20230221-1Google Scholar
eustream, 2011. Projekt reverzného toku plynu je dokončený.Google Scholar
eustream, 2021. Annual report 1 August 2020–31 July 2021. Bratislava.Google Scholar
Fabbrini, F., 2022. The legal architecture of the economic responses to COVID-19: EMU beyond the pandemic. JCMS J. Common Mark. Stud. 60, 186–203. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fagan, A., 2004. Environment and Democracy in the Czech Republic: The Environmental Movement in the Transition Process. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781845420604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fagan, A., Buzogány, A., 2022. Beyond Europeanization: political ecology and environmentalism in Central and Eastern Europe. Env. Polit. 31, 1203–1213. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2022.2147652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falkner, G., Treib, O., 2008. Three worlds of compliance or four? The EU-15 compared to new member states. J. Common Mark. Stud. 46, 293–313. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2007.00777.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fawn, R., 2006. The Temelín nuclear power plant and the European Union in Austrian–Czech relations. Communist Post-Communist Stud. 39, 101–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postcomstud.2005.12.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fekete, H., Kuramochi, T., Roelfsema, M., Elzen, M. den, Forsell, N., Höhne, N., Luna, L., Hans, F., Sterl, S., Olivier, J., van Soest, H., Frank, S., Gusti, M., 2021. A review of successful climate change mitigation policies in major emitting economies and the potential of global replication. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 137, 110602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernandez, R., Palazuelos, E., 2014. A political economy approach to the European Union gas model: continuities and changes. JCMS J. Common Mark. Stud. 52, 495–511. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferris, N., 2021. More renewables does not have to mean higher electricity bills. Energy Monitor. www.energymonitor.ai/policy/market-design/more-renewables-does-not-have-to-mean-higher-electricity-billsGoogle Scholar
Financial Times, 2021. Carbon pricing: twists on the winding road to net zero. Financial Times, 29 December.Google Scholar
Financial Times, 2022. Germany fires up coal plants to avert gas shortage as Russia cuts supply. Financial Times, 19 June.Google Scholar
Finke, D., 2017. Underneath the culture of consensus: transparency, credible commitments and voting in the Council of Ministers. Eur. Union Polit. 18, 339–361. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116517709972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischhendler, I., Nathan, D., Boymel, D., 2015. Marketing renewable energy through geopolitics: solar farms in Israel. Glob. Environ. Polit. 15, 98–120. https://doi.org/10.1162/GLEP_a_00300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, S., 2006. Political Change in Post-Communist Slovakia and Croatia: From Nationalist to Europeanist. Palgrave, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzgerald, J., 2012. The messy politics of ‘clean coal’: the shaping of a contested term in Appalachia’s energy debate. Organ. Environ. 25, 437–451. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026612466091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleck, A., 2022. Here’s where energy poverty is felt most in Europe. World Economic Forum. www.weforum.org/agenda/2022/11/energy-poverty-in-europe-heating-gas/Google Scholar
Fleming, R., 2019. A legal perspective on gas solidarity. Energy Policy 124, 102–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.09.037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, A., Newell, P., 2021. Regime resistance and accommodation: toward a neo-Gramscian perspective on energy transitions. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 79, 102163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foy, H., 2014. Poland on course for battle on new EU climate change targets. Financial Times, 1 October.Google Scholar
France 24, 2009. Russia agrees to higher oil transit fees with Ukraine’s Naftogaz. www.france24.com/en/20091229-russia-agrees-higher-oil-transit-fees-with-ukraines-naftogazGoogle Scholar
France 24, 2018. Greenpeace ends Polish coal-plant protest. France 24, 29 November. www.france24.com/en/20181129-greenpeace-ends-polish-coal-plant-protestGoogle Scholar
France 24, 2020a. Romania’s mining heartland faces up to post-coal future. France 24, 3 December. www.france24.com/en/live-news/20201203-romania-s-mining-heartland-faces-up-to-post-coal-futureGoogle Scholar
France 24, 2020b. Hungary says it blocked EU budget over migration ‘blackmail’. France 24, 18 November. www.france24.com/en/europe/20201118-hungary-says-it-blocked-eu-budget-over-migration-blackmailGoogle Scholar
France 24, 2022. Paris, Berlin ‘agree to disagree’ on French push to label nuclear energy green. France 24, 7 January. www.france24.com/en/europe/20220107-paris-berlin-agree-to-disagree-on-french-push-to-label-nuclear-energy-greenGoogle Scholar
Franki, V., Višković, A., 2015. Energy security, policy and technology in South East Europe: presenting and applying an energy security index to Croatia. Energy 90, 494–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.07.087CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frantál, B., Malý, J., 2017. Close or renew? Factors affecting local community support for rebuilding nuclear power plants in the Czech Republic. Energy Policy 104, 134–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.01.048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraune, C., Knodt, M., 2018. Sustainable energy transformations in an age of populism, post-truth politics, and local resistance. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 43, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.05.029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fridays for Future, 2022. Map. https://fridaysforfuture.org/action-map/map/Google Scholar
Friends of the Earth, 2021. Oil shale plant halted in Estonia after youth activists’ court case. https://friendsoftheearth.eu/news/shale-oil-plant-halted-in-estonia/Google Scholar
Friends of the Earth Europe, 2015. We are the limits! Anti-coal protests across Czech Republic. https://friendsoftheearth.eu/news/we-are-the-limits-anti-coal-protests-across-czech-republic/Google Scholar
Fuller, S., McCauley, D., 2016. Framing energy justice: perspectives from activism and advocacy. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 11, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2015.08.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
G7, 1992. Economic Declaration: Working Together for Growth and a Safer World. https://g7g20-documents.org/fileadmin/G7G20_documents/1992/G7/Germany/Leaders/1%20Leaders’%20Language/Economic%20Declaration%20-%20Working%20Together%20for%20Growth%20and%20a%20Safer%20World_08071992.pdfGoogle Scholar
G7, 2021. Carbis Bay G7 summit communiqué: our shared agenda for global action to build back better. www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/06/13/carbis-bay-g7-summit-communique/Google Scholar
Gabbatiss, J., 2018a. Poland broke law by logging ancient forest, rules EU court. The Independent, 17 April.Google Scholar
Gabbatiss, J., 2018b. COP24: Poland shows no signs of breaking coal addiction despite toxic air and warnings of climate disaster. The Independent, 8 December.Google Scholar
Gál, Z., 2021. From economic transformation to energy transition: the legacy of thirty years of post-communist development, in: Mišík, M., Oravcová, V. (Eds.), From Economic to Energy Transition: Three Decades of Transitions in Central and Eastern Europe. Springer International, Cham, pp. 29–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55085-1_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galbreath, D. J., Lašas, A., 2011. The ‘Baltic’ factor in EU–Russian relations: in search of coherence and co-operation in an era of complexity. J. Contemp. Eur. Stud. 19, 261–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2011.580914CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ganev, V. I., 2014. The legacies of 1989: Bulgaria’s year of civic anger. J. Democr. 25, 33–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gatto, A., 2022. The energy futures we want: a research and policy agenda for energy transitions. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 89, 102639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2022.102639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gawlikowska-Fyk, A., 2019. Poland: coping with the challenges of decarbonization and diversification, in: Godzimirski, J. M. (Ed.), New Political Economy of Energy in Europe: Power to Project, Power to Adapt. Springer International, Cham, pp. 195–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93360-3_8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geden, O., Fischer, S., 2014. Moving Targets: Negotiations on the EU’s Energy and Climate Policy Objectives for the Post-2020 Period and Implications for the German Energy Transition. Berlin.Google Scholar
Geden, O., Marcelis, C., Maurer, A., 2006. Perspectives for the European Union’s External Energy Policy. Berlin.Google Scholar
Geels, F. W., 2005. Processes and patterns in transitions and system innovations: refining the co-evolutionary multi-level perspective. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 72, 681–696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2004.08.014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geels, F. W., 2010. Ontologies, socio-technical transitions (to sustainability), and the multi-level perspective. Res. Policy 39, 495–510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geels, F. W., 2014. Regime resistance against low-carbon transitions: introducing politics and power into the multi-level perspective. Theory Cult. Soc. 31, 21–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276414531627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geels, F. W., Berkhout, F., van Vuuren, D. P., 2016. Bridging analytical approaches for low-carbon transitions. Nat. Clim. Chang. 6, 576–583. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geels, F. W., Sovacool, B., Schwanen, T., Sorrell, S., 2017. Sociotechnical transitions for deep decarbonization. Policy Forum 357, 1242–1244.Google ScholarPubMed
Geiger, J., 2023. Germany will need to hold onto coal power for longer. OilPrice.com, 16 January. https://oilprice.com/Latest-Energy-News/World-News/Germany-Will-Need-To-Hold-Onto-Coal-Power-For-Longer.htmlGoogle Scholar
Geny, F., 2010. Can unconventional gas be a game changer in European gas markets? Working paper, Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, Oxford.Google Scholar
Genys, D., Krikštolaitis, R., 2017. Switching political nuclear energy preferences, changing public attitude. Balt. J. Law Polit. 10, 225–243. https://doi.org/10.1515/bjlp-2017-0018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godzimirski, J. M., 2013. Russian Energy in a Changing World: What Is the Outlook for the Hydrocarbons Superpower? Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Godzimirski, J. M., 2016. EU Leadership in Energy and Environmental Governance: Global and Local Challenges and Responses. Palgrave, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gökgöz, F., Güvercin, M. T., 2018. Energy security and renewable energy efficiency in EU. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 96, 226–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.07.046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, S. M., 2011. Security of supply in the context of European energy market liberalisation: a brief overview. Int. Bus. Law J. 433–462.Google Scholar
Goldman, G. T., Berman, E., Halpern, M., Johnson, C., Kothari, Y., Reed, G., Rosenberg, A. A., 2017. Ensuring scientific integrity in the age of Trump. Science 80(355), 696–698. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aam5733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldthau, A., 2013. The Handbook of Global Energy Policy. Wiley, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldthau, A., 2016. Assessing Nord Stream 2: Regulation, Geopolitics & Energy Security in the EU, Central Eastern Europe & the UK. London.Google Scholar
Goldthau, A., 2018. The Politics of Shale Gas in Eastern Europe: Energy Security, Contested Technologies and the Social Licence to Frack. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldthau, A., Eicke, L., Weko, S., 2020. The global energy transition and the Global South, in: Hafner, M., Tagliapietra, S. (Eds.), The Geopolitics of the Global Energy Transition. Springer International, Cham, pp. 319–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39066-2_14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldthau, A., Sitter, N., 2015. A Liberal Actor in a Realist World: The European Union Regulatory State and the Global Political Economy of Energy. Oxford University Press, Oxford. https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2017/v20i0a1681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldthau, A., Sovacool, B. K., 2016. Energy technology, politics, and interpretative frames: shale gas fracking in Eastern Europe. Glob. Environ. Polit. 16, 50–69. https://doi.org/10.1162/GLEP_a_00375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonzalez-Salazar, M. A., Kirsten, T., Prchlik, L., 2018. Review of the operational flexibility and emissions of gas- and coal-fired power plants in a future with growing renewables. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 82, 1497–1513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gosens, J., Turnbull, A. B. H., Jotzo, F., 2022. China’s decarbonization and energy security plans will reduce seaborne coal imports: results from an installation-level model. Joule 6, 782–815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2022.03.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gotev, G., 2015. Seven EU Countries Oppose Nord Stream. Brussels.Google Scholar
Götz, R., 2007. Russian Gas and European Energy Security. Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik, Berlin.Google Scholar
Government of the Czech Republic, 2022. Programové prohlášení vlády. Prague.Google Scholar
Government of the Slovak Republic, 2019. Transformácia uhoľného regiónu horná Nitra. Bratislava.Google Scholar
Government of Slovenia, 2021. Slovenia joins the Powering Past Coal Alliance initiative. www.gov.si/en/news/2021-11-05-slovenia-joins-the-powering-past-coal-alliance-initiative/Google Scholar
Grant, Z. P., Tilley, J., 2019. Fertile soil: explaining variation in the success of Green parties. West Eur. Polit. 42, 495–516. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2018.1521673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gravey, V., Jordan, A., 2016. Does the European Union have a reverse gear? Policy dismantling in a hyperconsensual polity. J. Eur. Public Policy 23, 1180–1198. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2016.1186208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gravey, V., Jordan, A. J., 2020. Policy dismantling at EU level: reaching the limits of ‘an ever-closer ecological union’? Public Adm. 98, 349–362. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, D., 1995. Reforming the Energy Sector in Transition Economies: Selected Experience and Lessons. Washington, DC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green Growth Group, 2013. Going for Green Growth: The Case for Ambitious and Immediate EU Low Carbon Action. www.gov.uk/government/publications/going-for-green-growth-the-case-for-ambitious-and-immediate-eu-low-carbon-actionGoogle Scholar
Grigas, A., 2013a. Energy policy: the Achilles heel of Baltic States, in: Grigas, A., Kasekamp, A., Maslauskaite, K., Zorgenfreija, L. (Eds.), The Baltic States in the EU: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow. Notre Europe – Jacques Delors Institute, Paris.Google Scholar
Grigas, A., 2013b. The Politics of Energy and Memory between the Baltic States and Russia. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Gritsenko, D., 2018. Explaining choices in energy infrastructure development as a network of adjacent action situations: the case of LNG in the Baltic Sea region. Energy Policy 112, 74–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.10.014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groenleer, M. L. P., Van Schaik, L. G., 2007. United we stand? The European Union’s international actorness in the cases of the International Criminal Court and the Kyoto Protocol. JCMS J. Common Mark. Stud. 45, 969–998. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2007.00756.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gros, D., Steinherr, A., 2004. Economic Transition in Central and Eastern Europe: Planting the Seeds. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grubler, A., Wilson, C., Nemet, G., 2016. Apples, oranges, and consistent comparisons of the temporal dynamics of energy transitions. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 22, 18–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2016.08.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gündüzyeli, E., Flisowska, J., 2020. Poland goes all out on coal rescue against EU’s higher climate goal. Euractiv, 23 December. www.euractiv.com/section/energy/opinion/poland-goes-all-out-on-coal-rescue-against-eus-higher-climate-goal/Google Scholar
Gurgul, H., Lach, Ł., 2011. The role of coal consumption in the economic growth of the Polish economy in transition. Energy Policy 39, 2088–2099.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gürsan, C., de Gooyert, V., 2021. The systemic impact of a transition fuel: Does natural gas help or hinder the energy transition? Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 138, 110552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gürtler, K., Postpischil, R., Quitzow, R., 2019. The dismantling of renewable energy policies: the cases of Spain and the Czech Republic. Energy Policy 133, 110881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.110881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gustafson, T., 2020. The Bridge: Natural Gas in a Redivided Europe. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haber, H., 2018. Liberalizing markets, liberalizing welfare? Economic reform and social regulation in the EU’s electricity regime. J. Eur. Public Policy 25, 307–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2016.1249012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hager, C., Stefes, C. H., 2016. Germany’s Energy Transition: A Comparative Perspective. Palgrave Macmillan, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamed, T. A., Bressler, L., 2019. Energy security in Israel and Jordan: the role of renewable energy sources. Renew. Energy 135, 378–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.12.036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hancher, L., Marhold, A., 2019. A common EU framework regulating import pipelines for gas? Exploring the Commission’s proposal to amend the 2009 Gas Directive. J. Energy Nat. Resour. Law 37, 289–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/02646811.2019.1569873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanley, S., Vachudova, M. A., 2018. Understanding the illiberal turn: democratic backsliding in the Czech Republic. East Eur. Polit. 34, 276–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2018.1493457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harper, J., 2018. Poland’s pro-coal government goes green. DW, 5 September. www.dw.com/en/polands-pro-coal-government-goes-green/a-45357008Google Scholar
Harrabin, R., 2019. Paris Agreement: Trump confirms US will leave climate accord. BBC. www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-50165596Google Scholar
Hart, P.’t, 1993. Symbols, rituals and power: the lost dimensions of crisis management. J. Contingencies Cris. Manag. 1, 36–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5973.1993.tb00005.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haughton, T., 2007. When does the EU make a difference? Conditionality and the accession process in Central and Eastern Europe. Polit. Stud. Rev. 5, 233–246. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-9299.2007.00130.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haughton, T., 2011. Half full but also half empty: conditionality, compliance and the quality of democracy in Central and Eastern Europe. Polit. Stud. Rev. 9, 323–333. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-9302.2010.00220.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haughton, T., Malová, D., 2007. Emerging patterns of EU membership: drawing lessons from Slovakia’s first two years as a member state. Politics 27, 69–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9256.2007.00281.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hauser, P., Heinrichs, H. U., Gillessen, B., Müller, T., 2018. Implications of diversification strategies in the European natural gas market for the German energy system. Energy 151, 442–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.03.065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hausfather, Z., 2015. Bounding the climate viability of natural gas as a bridge fuel to displace coal. Energy Policy 86, 286–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.07.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawker, G., Bell, K., Gill, S., 2017. Electricity security in the European Union: the conflict between national capacity mechanisms and the single market. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 24, 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2016.12.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, A., 2023. China ramps up coal power despite carbon neutral pledges. The Guardian, 23 April.Google Scholar
Hay, C., 1996. Narrating crisis: the discursive construction of the ‘winter of discontent’. Sociology 30, 253–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038596030002004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heffron, R. J., McCauley, D., 2018. What is the ‘just transition’? Geoforum 88, 74–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.11.016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hefner, R. A., 2009. The Grand Energy Transition: The Rise of Energy Gases, Sustainable Life and the Next Great Expansion. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Heinrich, A., 2018. Securitisation in the gas sector: energy security debates concerning the example of the Nord Stream pipeline, in: Szulecki, K. (Ed.), Energy Security in Europe: Divergent Perceptions and Policy Challenges. Springer International, Cham, pp. 61–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64964-1_3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heisenberg, D., 2005. The institution of ‘consensus’ in the European Union: formal versus informal decision-making in the Council. Eur. J. Polit. Res. 44, 65–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2005.00219.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helm, D., 2007. The New Energy Paradigm. Oxford University Press, Oxford. https://doi.org/10.1108/17506220910970623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heptonstall, P. J., Gross, R. J. K., 2021. A systematic review of the costs and impacts of integrating variable renewables into power grids. Nat. Energy 6, 72–83. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-020-00695-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hernik, J., Noszczyk, T., Rutkowska, A., 2019. Towards a better understanding of the variables that influence renewable energy sources in eastern Poland. J. Clean. Prod. 241, 118075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118075CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herranz-Surrallés, A., 2016. An emerging EU energy diplomacy? Discursive shifts, enduring practices. J. Eur. Public Policy 23, 1386–1405. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2015.1083044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herranz-Surrallés, A., 2017. Energy diplomacy under scrutiny: parliamentary control of intergovernmental agreements with third‐country suppliers. West Eur. Polit. 40, 183–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2016.1240406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herranz-Surrallés, A., Solorio, I., Fairbrass, J. (Eds.), 2022. Renegotiating Authority in EU Energy and Climate Policy. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Herweg, N., 2017. European Union Policy-Making: The Regulatory Shift in Natural Gas Market Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hewitt, R. J., Bradley, N., Baggio Compagnucci, A., Barlagne, C., Ceglarz, A., Cremades, R., McKeen, M., Otto, I. M., Slee, B., 2019. Social innovation in community energy in Europe: a review of the evidence. Front. Energy Res. 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2019.00031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hickel, J., 2020. Quantifying national responsibility for climate breakdown: an equality-based attribution approach for carbon dioxide emissions in excess of the planetary boundary. Lancet Planet. Heal. 4, e399–e404. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542–5196(20)30196-0CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hilton, I., Kerr, O., 2017. The Paris Agreement: China’s ‘new normal’ role in international climate negotiations. Clim. Policy 17, 48–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2016.1228521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilton, J., 2018. Bulgarian coal communities face dark times. DW.com, 27 December. www.dw.com/en/bulgarian-coal-communities-face-dark-times/a-46825497Google Scholar
Hiteva, R. P., Maltby, T., 2014. Standing in the way by standing in the middle: the case of state-owned natural gas intermediaries in Bulgaria. Geoforum 54, 120–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.04.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodge, B.-M. S., Jain, H., Brancucci, C., Seo, G.-S., Korpås, M., Kiviluoma, J., Holttinen, H., Smith, J. C., Orths, A., Estanqueiro, A., Söder, L., Flynn, D., Vrana, T. K., Kenyon, R. W., Kroposki, B., 2020. Addressing technical challenges in 100% variable inverter-based renewable energy power systems. WIREs Energy Environ. 9, e376. https://doi.org/10.1002/wene.376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, C., 2022. COP27: UN chief calls for rich countries to agree ‘climate solidarity pact’. Financial Times, 7 November.Google Scholar
Hoegh-Guldberg, O., Jacob, D., Taylor, M., Guillén Bolaños, T., Bindi, M., Brown, S., Camilloni, I. A., Diedhiou, A., Djalante, R., Ebi, K., Engelbrecht, F., Guiot, J., Hijioka, Y., Mehrotra, S., Hope, C. W., Payne, A. J., Pörtner, H.-O., Seneviratne, S. I., Thomas, A., Warren, R., Zhou, G., 2019. The human imperative of stabilizing global climate change at 1.5°C. Science 365(6459). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaw6974CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hofmann, S. C., Staeger, U., 2019. Frame contestation and collective securitisation: the case of EU energy policy. West Eur. Polit. 42, 323–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2018.1510197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Högselius, P., 2012. Red Gas. Palgrave Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
Holesch, A., Kyriazi, A., 2022. Democratic backsliding in the European Union: the role of the Hungarian-Polish coalition. East Eur. Polit. 38, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2020.1865319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmgren, S., Pever, M., Fischer, K., 2019. Constructing low-carbon futures? Competing storylines in the Estonian energy sector’s translation of EU energy goals. Energy Policy 135, 111063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111063CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holz, F., Sogalla, R., von Hirschhausen, C. R., Kemfert, C., 2022. Energy supply security in Germany can be guaranteed even without natural gas from Russia: special issue on the war in Ukraine. DIW focus. www.diw.de/de/diw_01.c.839511.de/publikationen/diw_focus/2022_0007/energy_supply_security_in_germany_can_be_guaranteed_even_without_natural_gas_from_russia.htmlGoogle Scholar
Hope, K., 2014. Bulgarians see Russian hand in anti-shale protests. Financial Times, 30 November.Google Scholar
Hosli, M. O., Mattila, M., Uriot, M., 2011. Voting in the Council of the European Union after the 2004 enlargement: a comparison of old and new member states. J. Common Mark. Stud. 49, 1249–1270. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2011.02196.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubbert, M. K., 1956. Nuclear energy and the fossil fuels. Shell Development Company, Exploration and Production Research Division, Houston, TX. www.energycrisis.com/Hubbert/1956/1956.pdfGoogle Scholar
Huber, R. A., 2020. The role of populist attitudes in explaining climate change skepticism and support for environmental protection. Env. Polit. 29, 959–982. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2019.1708186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, R. A., Fesenfeld, L., Bernauer, T., 2020. Political populism, responsiveness, and public support for climate mitigation. Clim. Policy 20, 373–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2020.1736490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hungarian Government, 2012. National Security Strategy. Budapest.Google Scholar
Huntington, S. P., 1993. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman.Google Scholar
Huysmans, J., 2011. What’s in an act? On security speech acts and little security nothings. Secur. Dialogue 42, 371–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IAEA, 2021. Nuclear Power Reactors in the World. Vienna.Google Scholar
IAEA, 2022. IAEA Projections for Nuclear Power Growth Increase for Second Year Amid Climate, Energy Security Concerns. www.iaea.org/newscenter/pressreleases/iaea-projections-for-nuclear-power-growth-increase-for-second-year-amid-climate-energy-security-concernsGoogle Scholar
iDnes, 2022. Podpora jádra stoupá. Měli bychom být soběstační, říkají Češi v průzkumu. iDnes. www.idnes.cz/ekonomika/domaci/podpora-jaderne-energie-v-cr.A221128_122236_ekonomika_rieGoogle Scholar
IEA, 2016. Energy Policies of IEA Countries: Poland 2016 Review. Paris.Google Scholar
IEA, 2017. Coal 2017: Analysis and Forecasts to 2O22. Paris.Google Scholar
IEA, 2018. Slovak Republic: 2018 Review. Paris.Google Scholar
IEA, 2022a. Coal 2022: Analysis and Forecast to 2025. Paris.Google Scholar
IEA, 2022b. Global Energy Review: CO2 Emissions in 2021. Paris.Google Scholar
IEA, 2022c. Renewables. Paris.Google Scholar
IEA, 2022d. Energy System Overview. www.iea.org/reports/energy-system-overviewGoogle Scholar
IEA, 2022e. World Energy Outlook 2022: Executive Summary. Paris.Google Scholar
IEA, 2022f. World Energy Employment: Executive Summary. Paris.Google Scholar
IEA, 2022g. World Energy Investment 2022. Paris.Google Scholar
IMF, 2022. Fossil Fuel Subsidies. www.imf.org/en/Publications/WP/Issues/2023/08/22/IMF-Fossil-Fuel-Subsidies-Data-2023-Update-537281Google Scholar
Immergut, E. M., 2006. Historical-institutionalism in political science and the problem of change, in: Wimmer, A., Kössler, R. (Eds.), Understanding Change: Models, Methodologies and Metaphors. Palgrave Macmillan UK, London, pp. 237–259. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230524644_17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Independent, 2021. Polish miners, power workers, protest shift away from coal. Via AP News, 9 June.Google Scholar
The Independent, 2022. Czech Republic to end coal use by 2033, boost nuclear power. The Independent, 7 January.Google Scholar
Industriall, 2021. Trade unions protest in Sofia against the lack of clear vision on a just transition in Bulgaria. https://news.industriall-europe.eu/Article/656Google Scholar
Innovation and Networks Executive Agency, 2021. First Croatian LNG terminal officially inaugurated in Krk island. https://cinea.ec.europa.eu/news-events/news/first-croatian-lng-terminal-officially-inaugurated-krk-island-2021-01-29_enGoogle Scholar
Intellinews, 2020. French Orano to join $8bn nuclear power plant expansion project in Romania. www.intellinews.com/french-orano-to-join-8bn-nuclear-power-plant-expansion-project-in-romania-195122/Google Scholar
IPCC, 2014. Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Cambridge.Google Scholar
IPCC, 2018. Global warming of 1.5°C. www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/sites/2/2022/06/SPM_version_report_LR.pdfCrossRefGoogle Scholar
IPCC, 2022a. Headline Statements. www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/syr/resources/spm-headline-statements/Google Scholar
IPCC, 2022b. Climate Change 2022, Mitigation of Climate Change, Summary for Policymakers. Geneva.Google Scholar
IRENA, 2020. Renewable Energy Prospects for Central and South-Eastern Europe Energy Connectivity. Abu Dhabi.Google Scholar
IRENA, 2021. Renewable Energy and Jobs: Annual Review 2021. Abu Dhabi.Google Scholar
Isaacs, R., Molnar, A., 2017. Island in the neoliberal stream: energy security and soft re-nationalisation in Hungary. J. Contemp. Eur. Stud. 25, 107–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2016.1198688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isoaho, K., Markard, J., 2020. The politics of technology decline: discursive struggles over coal phase-out in the UK. Rev. Policy Res. 37, 342–368. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ITV, 2021. Western countries ‘shoulder responsibility’ for climate change action. www.itv.com/news/2021-10-18/western-countries-shoulder-responsibility-for-climate-change-actionGoogle Scholar
Iyer, G., Ledna, C., Clarke, L., Edmonds, J., McJeon, H., Kyle, P., Williams, J. H., 2017. Measuring progress from nationally determined contributions to mid-century strategies. Nat. Clim. Chang. 7, 871–874. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558–017-0005-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jack, V., 2022. Energy emergency revives Estonia’s polluting oil shale industry. Politico, 28 August. www.politico.eu/article/energy-emergency-revives-estonias-polluting-oil-shale-industry/Google Scholar
Jackson, J., 2023. Polish backpedal on windfarms put EU funds at risk. EUobserver, 31 January. https://euobserver.com/green-economy/156661Google Scholar
Jahn, D., 2021. Quick and dirty: how populist parties in government affect greenhouse gas emissions in EU member states. J. Eur. Public Policy 28, 980–997. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2021.1918215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jamasb, T., Pollitt, M., 2005. Electricity market reform in the European Union: review of progress toward liberalization & integration. Energy J. 26, 11–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jamasmie, C., 2016. Bulgaria coal miners stay underground to protest layoffs, delayed salaries. Mining.com, 12 October. www.mining.com/bulgaria-coal-miners-stay-underground-to-protest-layoffs-delayed-salaries/Google Scholar
Janda, K., 2018. Slovak electricity market and the price merit order effect of photovoltaics. Energy Policy 122, 551–562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.07.021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janeliūnas, T., 2009. Lithuanian energy strategy and its implications on regional cooperation, in: Spruds, A., Rostoks, T. (Eds.), Energy: Pulling the Baltic Sea Region Together or Apart? Latvian Institute of International Affairs, Riga, pp. 190–222.Google Scholar
Janeliūnas, T., 2021. Energy transformation in Lithuania: aiming for the grand changes, in: Mišík, M., Oravcová, V. (Eds.), From Economic to Energy Transition: Three Decades of Transitions in Central and Eastern Europe. Springer International, Cham, pp. 283–313. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55085-1_10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jänicke, M., Quitzow, R., 2016. Multi-level reinforcement in European climate and energy governance: mobilizing economic interests at the sub-national levels. Environmental Policy and Governance, 27, 122–136. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jankó, F., Drüszler, Á., Gálos, B., Móricz, N., Papp-Vancsó, J., Pieczka, I., Pongrácz, R., Rasztovits, E., Dezső, Z. S., Szabó, O., 2020. Recalculating climate change consensus: the question of position and rhetoric. J. Clean. Prod. 254, 120127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaramillo, P., Griffin, W. M., Matthews, H. S., 2007. Comparative life-cycle air emissions of coal, domestic natural gas, LNG, and SNG for electricity generation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 41, 6290–6296. https://doi.org/10.1021/es063031oCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jarosz, A., 2011. Rola Unii Europejskiej w sporze o gazociąg północny. Komentarze w prasie polskiej i niemieckiej. Rocz. Pol. https://doi.org/10.35757/RPN.2011.19.07CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jasanoff, S., Simmet, H. R., 2017. No funeral bells: public reason in a ‘post-truth’ age. Soc. Stud. Sci. 47, 751–770. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312717731936CrossRefGoogle Scholar
JAVYS, 2019. Decommissioning of Nuclear Facilities: A1 Nuclear Power Plant. Bratislava.Google Scholar
JAVYS, 2023. Spoločnosť JAVYS uskutočnila v roku 2022 päť prepráv vyhoretého jadrového paliva a zabezpečovala päť prepráv čerstvého jadrového paliva. www.javys.sk/sk/informacny-servis/aktuality-tlacove-spravy-napisali-o-nas/tlacove-spravy/2057-spolocnost-javys-uskutocnila-v-roku-2022-pat-preprav-vyhoreteho-jadroveho-paliva-a-zabezpecovala-pat-preprav-cerstveho-jadroveho-palivaGoogle Scholar
Jenčová, I., 2022. Európa bude šetriť plynom za cenu veľkých ústupkov. Euractiv.sk, 27 July.Google Scholar
Jenkins, K. E. H., Sovacool, B. K., Błachowicz, A., Lauer, A., 2020. Politicising the just transition: linking global climate policy, Nationally Determined Contributions and targeted research agendas. Geoforum 115, 138–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.05.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jewell, J., 2011. Ready for nuclear energy? An assessment of capacities and motivations for launching new national nuclear power programs. Energy Policy 39, 1041–1055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.10.041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jewell, J., Vinichenko, V., Nacke, L., Cherp, A., 2019. Prospects for powering past coal. Nat. Clim. Chang. 9, 592–597. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0509-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeziorski, M., 2006. Gas Pains. Warsaw.Google Scholar
Jirušek, M., 2020. The attitude of the Visegrad Group countries towards Russian infrastructural projects in the gas sector. Energy Policy 139, 111340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jirušek, M., Kuchyňková, P., Vlček, T., 2020. Business as usual or geopolitical games? Russian activities in energy sector of the Czech Republic, in: Holzer, J., Mareš, M. (Eds.), Czech Security Dilemma: Russia as a Friend or Enemy? Palgrave, London, pp. 117–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jirušek, M., Vlček, T., Henderson, J., 2017. Russia’s energy relations in Southeastern Europe: an analysis of motives in Bulgaria and Greece. Post-Soviet Aff. 33, 335–355. https://doi.org/10.1080/1060586X.2017.1341256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jonek-Kowalska, I., 2022. Multi-criteria evaluation of the effectiveness of energy policy in Central and Eastern European countries in a long-term perspective. Energy Strateg. Rev. 44, 100973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2022.100973CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, D., Brown, S., Czyżak, P., Broadbent, H., Bruce-Lockhart, C., Dizon, R., Ewen, M., Fulghum, N., Copsey, L., Candlin, A., Rosslowe, C., Fox Disclaimer, H., 2023. European Electricity Review 2023. London.Google Scholar
Jordan, A., Bauer, M. W., Green-Pedersen, C., 2013. Policy dismantiling. J. Eur. Public Policy 20, 795–805. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2013.771092CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, A., Huitema, D., van Asselt, H., Rayner, T., Berkhout, F., 2010. Climate Change Policy in the European Union: Confronting the Dilemmas of Mitigation and Adaptation? Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139042772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, A. J., Moore, B., 2020. Durable by Design? Policy Feedback in a Changing Climate. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108779869CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joskow, P. L., Parsons, J. E., 2012. The future of nuclear power after Fukushima. Econ. Energy Environ. Policy 1, 99–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
JRC, 2018. EU Coal Regions: Opportunities and Challenges Ahead. Brussels.Google Scholar
JRC, 2021. Recent Trends in EU Coal, Peat and Oil Shale Regions. Brussels.Google Scholar
Judge, A., Maltby, T., 2017. European Energy Union? Caught between securitisation and ‘riskification’. Eur. J. Int. Secur. 2, 179–202. https://doi.org/10.1017/eis.2017.3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kallemets, K., 2016. Economic sustainability of Estonian shale oil industry until 2030. Oil Shale 33, 272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalt, T., 2021. Jobs vs. climate justice? Contentious narratives of labor and climate movements in the coal transition in Germany. Env. Polit. 30, 1135–1154. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2021.1892979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kama, K., 2016. Contending geo-logics: energy security, resource ontologies, and the politics of expert knowledge in Estonia. Geopolitics 21, 831–856. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2016.1210129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaminski, I., 2018. Poland’s coal habit draws new fire as UN climate talks begin. Clim. Docket. www.climateliabilitynews.org/2018/12/02/poland-coal-un-climate-katowice/Google Scholar
Karimi, F., Toikka, A., 2018. General public reactions to carbon capture and storage: Does culture matter? Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 70, 193–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2018.01.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katinas, V., Markevicius, A., Perednis, E., Savickas, J., 2014. Sustainable energy development: Lithuania’s way to energy supply security and energetics independence. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 30, 420–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.10.033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keles, D., Yilmaz, H. Ü., 2020. Decarbonisation through coal phase-out in Germany and Europe: impact on emissions, electricity prices and power production. Energy Policy 141, 111472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemfert, C., Präger, F., Braunger, I., Hoffart, F. M., Brauers, H., 2022. The expansion of natural gas infrastructure puts energy transitions at risk. Nat. Energy 7, 582–587. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560–022-01060-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khan, I., Hou, F., Irfan, M., Zakari, A., Le, H. P., 2021. Does energy trilemma a driver of economic growth? The roles of energy use, population growth, and financial development. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 146, 111157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khan, M., 2021. The EU’s electricity market and why soaring gas prices are driving bills higher. Financial Times, 14 October. www.ft.com/content/f37d2a36-4609-4b3e-9795-064b6d459676Google Scholar
Khrushcheva, O., Maltby, T., 2016. The future of EU-Russia energy relations in the context of decarbonisation. Geopolitics 21, 799–830. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2016.1188081CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kikstra, J. S., Vinca, A., Lovat, F., Boza-Kiss, B., van Ruijven, B., Wilson, C., Rogelj, J., Zakeri, B., Fricko, O., Riahi, K., 2021. Climate mitigation scenarios with persistent COVID-19-related energy demand changes. Nat. Energy 6, 1114–1123. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560–021-00904-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kilian, B., Elgström, O., 2010. Still a green leader? The European Union’s role in international climate negotiations. Coop. Confl. 45, 255–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingsley, T., 2021. ‘Utopian fantasy’: Hungary’s Orban attacks EU climate change policy in latest spat. The Independent, 21 October. www.independent.co.uk/climate-change/climate-change-hungary-eu-b1942790.htmlGoogle Scholar
Kirchner, E., Berk, C., 2010. European energy security co-operation: between amity and enmity. JCMS J. Common Mark. Stud. 48, 859–880. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02077.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klare, M. T., 2009. Rising Powers, Shrinking Planet: The New Geopolitics of Energy. Henry Holt, New York.Google Scholar
Klemetti, L., Mäkinen, H., 2022. New sources of natural gas for Finland: the Balticconnector pipeline and LNG imports, in: Liuhto, K. (Ed.), The Future of Energy Consumption, Security and Natural Gas: LNG in the Baltic Sea Region. Springer International, Cham, pp. 275–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80367-4_10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klevas, V., Streimikiene, D., Grikstaite, R., 2007. Sustainable energy in Baltic States. Energy Policy 35, 76–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2005.10.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kluth, A., 2022. Europe is faking solidarity, and Putin knows it. Bloomberg, 27 July. www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2022-07-27/european-union-gas-deal-shows-fake-solidarity-and-putin-knows-it#xj4y7vzkgGoogle Scholar
Knill, C., Tosun, J., Bauer, M. W., 2009. Neglected faces of Europeanization: the differential impact of the EU on the dismantling of domestic policies. Public Adm. 87, 519–537. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2009.01768.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kochanek, E., 2019. Regional cooperation on gas security in Central Europe. Polityka Energ. – Energy Policy J. 22, 19–38. https://doi.org/10.33223/epj/103667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kopecký, P., Mudde, C., 2002. The two sides of Euroscepticism: party positions on European integration in East Central Europe. Eur. Union Polit. 3, 297–326. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116502003003002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kopecký, P., Mudde, C., 2003. Rethinking civil society. Democratization 10, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510340312331293907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kopp, S.-D., 2015. Politics, Markets and EU Gas Supply Security: Case Studies of the UK and Germany. Springer, Wiesbaden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korkmaz, D., 2018. Is the EU a great power? The case of natural gas, in: Heiskala, R., Aro, J. (Eds.), Policy Design in the European Union: An Empire of Shopkeepers in the Making? Springer International, Cham, pp. 217–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64849-1_10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korosteleva, J., 2022. The implications of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine for the EU energy market and businesses. Br. J. Manag. 33, 1678–1682. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kotek, P., Selei, A., Takácsné Tóth, B., Felsmann, B., 2023. What can the EU do to address the high natural gas prices? Energy Policy 173, 113312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kovacevic, A., 2009. The Impact of the Russia–Ukraine Gas Crisis in South Eastern Europe. Oxford.Google Scholar
Kovács, Z., 2014. Hungarian public left in the dark over decision to build new reactors at Paks nuclear power plant. Budapest Beacon, 17 January. https://budapestbeacon.com/hungarian-public-left-in-the-dark-over-decision-to-build-new-reactors-at-paks-nuclear-power-plant/Google Scholar
Kozlova, M., Overland, I., 2022. Combining capacity mechanisms and renewable energy support: a review of the international experience. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 155, 111878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111878CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, J. M., 2004. EU enlargement and the environment: six challenges. Env. Polit. 13, 290–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010410001685245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kratochvíl, P., Mišík, M., 2020. Bad external actors and good nuclear energy: media discourse on energy supplies in the Czech Republic and Slovakia. Energy Policy 136, 111058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreienkamp, J., Pegram, T., Coen, D., 2022. Explaining transformative change in EU climate policy: multilevel problems, policies, and politics. J. Eur. Integr. 44, 731–748. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2022.2072838CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krupnik, S., Wagner, A., Koretskaya, O., Rudek, T. J., Wade, R., Mišík, M., Akerboom, S., Foulds, C., Smith Stegen, K., Adem, Ç., Batel, S., Rabitz, F., Certomà, C., Chodkowska-Miszczuk, J., Denac, M., Dokupilová, D., Leiren, M. D., Ignatieva, M. F., Gabaldón-Estevan, D., Horta, A., Karnøe, P., Lilliestam, J., Loorbach, D., Mühlemeier, S., Nemoz, S., Nilsson, M., Osička, J., Papamikrouli, L., Pellizioni, L., Sareen, S., Sarrica, M., Seyfang, G., Sovacool, B., Telešienė, A., Zapletalová, V., von Wirth, T., 2022. Beyond technology: a research agenda for social sciences and humanities research on renewable energy in Europe. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 89, 102536. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ERSS.2022.102536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruyt, B., van Vuuren, D. P., de Vries, H. J. M., Groenenberg, H., 2009. Indicators for energy security. Energy Policy 37, 2166–2181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.02.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuchler, M., 2017. Post-conventional energy futures: rendering Europe’s shale gas resources governable. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 31, 32–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.05.028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuchler, M., Bridge, G., 2018. Down the black hole: sustaining national socio-technical imaginaries of coal in Poland. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 41, 136–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.04.014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kulovesi, K., Oberthür, S., 2020. Assessing the EU’s 2030 Climate and Energy Policy Framework: incremental change toward radical transformation? Rev. Eur. Comp. Int. Environ. Law 29, 151–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/reel.12358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kunze, C., Becker, S., 2015. Collective ownership in renewable energy and opportunities for sustainable degrowth. Sustain. Sci. 10, 425–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurmayer, N. J., 2022a. Germany’s first LNG terminal is open for business. Euractiv.com, 17 December. www.euractiv.com/section/energy/news/germanys-first-lng-terminal-is-open-for-business/Google Scholar
Kurmayer, N. J., 2022b. Germany and five other EU countries commit to solidarity as blackouts loom. Euractiv.com, 27 June. www.euractiv.com/section/energy/news/germany-and-five-other-eu-countries-commit-to-solidarity-as-blackouts-loom/Google Scholar
Kurmayer, N. J., 2022c. Berlin makes U-turn, backs joint gas purchasing at EU level. Euractiv.com, 4 October. www.euractiv.com/section/energy/news/berlin-makes-u-turn-backs-joint-gas-purchasing-at-eu-level/Google Scholar
Kurmayer, N. J., 2022d. EU approves CO2 tax on heating and transport, softened by new social climate fund. Euractiv.com, 18 December. www.euractiv.com/section/emissions-trading-scheme/news/eu-agrees-co2-tax-on-heating-and-transport-fuels-softened-by-new-social-climate-fund/Google Scholar
Kuus, M., 2007. Geopolitics Reframed: Security and Identity in Europe’s Eastern Enlargement. Palgrave Macmillan, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuzemko, C., 2014. Ideas, power and change: explaining EU–Russia energy relations. J. Eur. Public Policy 21, 58–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2013.835062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuzemko, C., Blondeel, M., Dupont, C., Brisbois, M. C., 2022. Russia’s war on Ukraine, European energy policy responses & implications for sustainable transformations. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 93, 102842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2022.102842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuzemko, C., Bradshaw, M., Bridge, G., Goldthau, A., Jewell, J., Overland, I., Scholten, D., Van de Graaf, T., Westphal, K., 2020. Covid-19 and the politics of sustainable energy transitions. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 68, 101685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101685CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuzemko, C., Lockwood, M., Mitchell, C., Hoggett, R., 2016. Governing for sustainable energy system change: politics, contexts and contingency. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 12, 96–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2015.12.022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaBelle, M., 2009. Expanding opportunities: strategic buying of utilities in new EU member states. Energy Policy 37, 4672–4678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.06.022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaBelle, M., Goldthau, A., 2014. Escaping the valley of death? Comparing shale gas technology policy prospects to nuclear and solar in Europe. J. World Energy Law Bus. 7, 93–111. https://doi.org/10.1093/jwelb/jwt020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaBelle, M., Horwitch, M., 2013. The breakout of energy innovation: accelerating to a new low carbon energy system, in: Goldthau, A. (Ed.), The Handbook of Global Energy Policy, Wiley Online Books.Google Scholar
LaBelle, M. C., 2017. In pursuit of energy justice. Energy Policy 107, 615–620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.03.054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lahiri-Dutt, K., 2016. The diverse worlds of coal in India: energising the nation, energising livelihoods. Energy Policy 99, 203–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.05.045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamb, W. F., Antal, M., Bohnenberger, K., Brand-Correa, L. I., Müller-Hansen, F., Jakob, M., Minx, J. C., Raiser, K., Williams, L., Sovacool, B. K., 2020. What are the social outcomes of climate policies? A systematic map and review of the ex-post literature. Environ. Res. Lett. 15, 113006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latvian Government, 2005. National Security Strategy. Riga.Google Scholar
Latvian Government, 2006. Guidelines for Development of Energy Sector for 2007−2016. Riga.Google Scholar
Latvian Government, 2008. National Security Strategy. Riga.Google Scholar
Latvian Government, 2011. National Security Strategy. Riga.Google Scholar
Latvian Government, 2015. National Security Strategy. Riga.Google Scholar
Latvian Government, 2020. Latvia’s National Energy and Climate Plan 2021–2030. Riga.Google Scholar
Le Billon, P., Lujala, P., Singh, D., Culbert, V., Kristoffersen, B., 2021. Fossil fuels, climate change, and the COVID-19 crisis: pathways for a just and green post-pandemic recovery. Clim. Policy 21, 1347–1356. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2021.1965524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Coq, C., Paltseva, E., 2014. EU-Russia gas relationship at a crossroads, in: Oxenstierna, S., Tynkkynen, V.-P. (Eds.), Russian Energy and Security up to 2030. Routledge, London, pp. 59–78.Google Scholar
Lehotský, L., Černoch, F., Osička, J., Ocelík, P., 2019. When climate change is missing: media discourse on coal mining in the Czech Republic. Energy Policy 129, 774–786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.02.065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehtveer, M., Pelakauskas, M., Ipbüker, C., Howells, M., Rogner, H.-H., Das, A., Toomet, O.-S., Tkaczyk, A. H., 2016. Estonian energy supply strategy assessment for 2035 and its vulnerability to climate driven shocks. Environ. Prog. Sustain. Energy 35, 469–478. https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.12240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leimbach, M., Giannousakis, A., 2019. Burden sharing of climate change mitigation: global and regional challenges under shared socio-economic pathways. Clim. Change 155, 273–291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584–019-02469-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LETA, 2022. Liquefied natural gas terminal idea progresses in Latvia. Baltic News Network, 20 April. https://bnn-news.com/liquefied-natural-gas-terminal-idea-progresses-in-latvia-234039Google Scholar
Levesque, A., Pietzcker, R. C., Baumstark, L., Luderer, G., 2021. Deep decarbonisation of buildings energy services through demand and supply transformations in a 1.5°C scenario. Environ. Res. Lett. 16, 054071. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abdf07CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, L., Taeihagh, A., 2020. An in-depth analysis of the evolution of the policy mix for the sustainable energy transition in China from 1981 to 2020. Appl. Energy 263, 114611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, B., Raza, M. Y., 2020. Coal and economic development in Pakistan: a necessity of energy source. Energy 207, 118244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.118244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lippert, B., Umbach, G., Wessels, W., 2001. Europeanization of CEE executives: EU membership negotiations as a shaping power. J. Eur. Public Policy 8, 980–1012. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760110098314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lis, A., Stankiewicz, P., 2017. Framing shale gas for policy-making in Poland. J. Environ. Policy Plan. 19, 53–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2016.1143355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lithuanian Government, 2002. National Security Strategy. Vilnius.Google Scholar
Lithuanian Government, 2012. National Security Strategy. Vilnius.Google Scholar
Lithuanian Government, 2017. National Security Strategy. Vilnius.Google Scholar
Lockwood, M., 2018. Right-wing populism and the climate change agenda: exploring the linkages. Env. Polit. 27, 712–732. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2018.1458411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lockwood, M., Kuzemko, C., Mitchell, C., Hoggett, R., 2017. Historical institutionalism and the politics of sustainable energy transitions: a research agenda. Environ. Plan. C Polit. Sp. 35, 312–333. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263774X16660561Google Scholar
Lofstedt, R., 2008. Are renewables an alternative to nuclear power? An analysis of the Austria/Slovakia discussions. Energy Policy 36, 2226–2233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.11.022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loisel, R., Alexeeva, V., Zucker, A., Shropshire, D., 2018. Load-following with nuclear power: market effects and welfare implications. Prog. Nucl. Energy 109, 280–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2018.08.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowitzsch, J., Hoicka, C. E., van Tulder, F. J., 2020. Renewable energy communities under the 2019 European Clean Energy Package: Governance model for the energy clusters of the future? Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 122, 109489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.109489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LRT, 2019. Swedish court upholds arbitration ruling in Lithuania’s dispute with Gazprom. LRT.it, 4 July. www.lrt.lt/naujienos/news-in-english/19/1075565/swedish-court-upholds-arbitration-ruling-in-lithuania-s-dispute-with-gazpromGoogle Scholar
Macalister, T., 2000. Look east: Doors open to majors. The Guardian, 14 November.Google Scholar
MacDowall, A., 2012. Bulgaria’s grand slam energy plans: two down, South Stream to go. Financial Times, 3 April. www.ft.com/content/beb4140e-b639-37e1-a57f-5c9444878cfaGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, J., Thelen, K., 2010. Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Makszimov, V., 2022. Solar industry ‘shocked’ by Hungarian government’s suspension of feed-in. Euractiv.com, 17 October. www.euractiv.com/section/politics/news/solar-industry-shocked-by-hungarian-governments-suspension-of-feed-in/Google Scholar
Maldini, P., Pauković, D., 2015. Croatia and the European Union. Changes and Development. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Maltby, T., 2013. European Union energy policy integration: a case of European Commission policy entrepreneurship and increasing supranationalism. Energy Policy 55, 435–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.12.031CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maltby, T., 2014. European energy security policy-making in the context of EU enlargement: the role of newer member states as agenda-setters. PhD thesis, University of Manchester.Google Scholar
Maltby, T., 2015. Between amity, enmity and Europeanisation: EU energy security policy and the example of Bulgaria’s Russian energy dependence. Eur. Asia. Stud. 67, 809–830. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2015.1046817CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manowska, A., Osadnik, K. T., Wyganowska, M., 2017. Economic and social aspects of restructuring Polish coal mining: focusing on Poland and the EU. Resour. Policy 52, 192–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2017.02.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcinkiewicz, K., 2006. The European Energy Security Treaty: let us respond together to energy threats. Financial Times.Google Scholar
Marcinkiewicz, K., Tosun, J., 2015. Contesting climate change: mapping the political debate in Poland. East Eur. Polit. 31, 187–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2015.1022648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marinaș, M.-C., Dinu, M., Socol, A.-G., Socol, C., 2018. Renewable energy consumption and economic growth: causality relationship in Central and Eastern European countries. PLoS ONE 13, e0202951.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marktanner, M., Salman, L., 2011. Economic and geopolitical dimensions of renewable vs. nuclear energy in North Africa. Energy Policy 39, 4479–4489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.12.047CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, J. P., 2016. Disordering fantasies of coal and technology: carbon capture and storage in Australia. Energy Policy 99, 288–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.05.044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marti, L., Puertas, R., 2022. Sustainable energy development analysis: energy trilemma. Sustain. Technol. Entrep. 1, 100007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stae.2022.100007Google Scholar
Martin, R., Sunley, P., 2010. The Place of Path Dependence in an Evolutionary Perspective on the Economic Landscape. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781849806497.00010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mata Pérez, M. de la E., Scholten, D., Smith Stegen, K., 2019. The multi-speed energy transition in Europe: opportunities and challenges for EU energy security. Energy Strateg. Rev. 26, 100415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2019.100415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathew, M. D., 2022. Nuclear energy: a pathway towards mitigation of global warming. Prog. Nucl. Energy 143, 104080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2021.104080CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matláry, J. H., 1997. Energy Policy in the European Union. Macmillan Education UK, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25735-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattila, M., 2008. Voting and coalitions in the Council after the enlargement, in: Naurin, D., Wallace, H. (Eds.), Unveiling the Council of the European Union: Games Governments Play in Brussels. Palgrave Macmillan UK, London, pp. 23–35. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230583788_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattila, M., 2009. Roll call analysis of voting in the European Union Council of Ministers after the 2004 enlargement. Eur. J. Polit. Res. 48, 840–857. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2009.01850.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, S. M., 2008. Path dependence and Commission activism in the evolution of the European Union’s external energy policy. J. Int. Relations Dev. 11, 251–278. https://doi.org/10.1057/jird.2008.12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazák, J., Diviák, T., 2018. Transactional activism without transactions: network perspective on anti-corruption activism in the Czech Republic. Soc. Mov. Stud. 17, 203–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2017.1404904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCauley, D., Heffron, R., 2018. Just transition: integrating climate, energy and environmental justice. Energy Policy 119, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.04.014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCormick, M., 2023. US nuclear enjoys revival as public and private funding pours in. Financial Times, 1 January. www.ft.com/content/f3c6f333-bc2e-4694-963a-7084e438905aGoogle Scholar
McCright, A. M., Dunlap, R. E., Marquart-Pyatt, S. T., 2016. Political ideology and views about climate change in the European Union. Env. Polit. 25, 338–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2015.1090371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCurry, J., 2022. Japan eyes return to nuclear power more than a decade after Fukushima disaster. The Guardian, 25 August.Google Scholar
McDonald, M., 2013. Discourses of climate security. Polit. Geogr. 33, 42–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2013.01.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McEnchroe, T., 2020. 61 percent of Czechs support nuclear energy, survey shows. https://english.radio.cz/61-percent-czechs-support-nuclear-energy-survey-shows-8702325Google Scholar
McGlade, C., Pye, S., Ekins, P., Bradshaw, M., Watson, J., 2018. The future role of natural gas in the UK: A bridge to nowhere? Energy Policy 113, 454–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.11.022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGowan, F., 2011. Putting energy insecurity into historical context: European responses to the energy crises of the 1970s and 2000s. Geopolitics 16, 486–511. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2011.520857CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGowan, F., 2014. Regulating innovation: European responses to shale gas development. Env. Polit. 23, 41–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2012.740939CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McWilliams, B., Zachmann, G., 2022. European Union Demand Reduction Needs to Cope with Russian Gas Cuts. Brussels.Google Scholar
Meadowcroft, J., 2009. What about the politics? Sustainable development, transition management, and long term energy transitions. Policy Sci. 42, 323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077–009-9097-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melichar, J., 2018. Will Slovak coal giant benefit from EU’s clean energy transition efforts? Euractiv.com, 11 June. www.euractiv.com/section/energy/opinion/will-slovak-coal-giant-benefit-from-eus-clean-energy-transition-efforts/Google Scholar
Menon, S., 2022. Ukraine crisis: Who is buying Russian oil and gas? BBC, 23 May. www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-60783874Google Scholar
Mezősi, A., Felsmann, B., Kerekes, L., & Szabó, L., 2020. Coexistence of nuclear and renewables in the V4 electricity system: friends or enemies? Energy Policy, 140, 111449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mete, G., 2020a. The energy mix: decarbonisation and natural gas in EU energy policy, in: Energy Transitions and the Future of Gas in the EU: Subsidise or Decarbonise (pp. 37–89). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32614-2_3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mete, G., 2020b. Energy Transitions and the Future of Gas in the EU: Subsidise or Decarbonise. Palgrave, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, M., Moder, C., Neumayr, M., Vandor, P., 2020. Civil Society and Its Institutional Context in CEE. Volunt. Int. J. Volunt. Nonprofit Organ. 31, 811–827. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-019-00106-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MFA Poland, 2014. Roadmap towards an Energy Union for Europe. Non-paper addressing the EU’s energy dependency challenges. Warsaw.Google Scholar
Mihók, P., 2020. Understanding political institutional support for completing the Mochovce nuclear power plant. Prog. Nucl. Energy 120, 103192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2019.103192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mikulska, A., Kosinski, E., 2018. Explaining Poland’s coal paradox. Forbes, 28 March. www.forbes.com/sites/thebakersinstitute/2018/03/28/explaining-polands-coal-paradox/Google Scholar
Miller, C. A., Iles, A., Jones, C. F., 2013. The social dimensions of energy transitions. Sci. Cult. (Lond). 22, 135–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2013.786989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills-Novoa, M., Liverman, D. M., 2019. Nationally Determined Contributions: material climate commitments and discursive positioning in the NDCs. WIREs Clim. Chang. 10, e589. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milne, R., 2022. Lithuania becomes first EU country to end imports of Russian gas. Financial Times, 3 April. www.ft.com/content/efcadd5a-b192-4567-a991-56cd6fd83daeGoogle Scholar
Minas, S., Ntousas, V., 2018 . EU Climate Diplomacy: Politics, Law and Negotiations. Routledge, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministerstwo Gospodarki, 2014. Polish Nuclear Power Programme. Warsaw.Google Scholar
Ministry of Economy of the Slovak Republic, 2014. Energy Policy of the Slovak Republic. Bratislava.Google Scholar
Ministry of Economy of the Slovak Republic, 2015. Rozhodnutie č.23/2015 Ministerstva hospodárstva SR. Bratislava.Google Scholar
Ministry of Energy, 2019. Draft Integrated Energy and Climate Plan of the Republic of Bulgaria. Sofia.Google Scholar
Ministry of Energy, 2021. Integrated Energy and Climate Plan of the Republic of Bulgaria. Sofia.Google Scholar
Ministry of Energy of Poland, 2021. Energy of Poland until 2040. www.gov.pl/attachment/62a054de-0a3d-444d-a969-90a89502df94Google Scholar
Ministry of Energy of the Republic of Lithuania, 2015. LitPol Link to receive EUR 27 million of EU funding. https://enmin.lrv.lt/en/news/litpol-link-to-receive-eur-27-million-of-eu-fundingGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Energy of the Republic of Lithuania, 2018. National Energy Independence Strategy. Vilnius.Google Scholar
Ministry of National Development, 2012. National Energy Strategy 2030. Budapest.Google Scholar
Ministry of Trade and Industry of the Czech Republic, 2015a. Státní energetická koncepce. Prague.Google Scholar
Ministry of Trade and Industry of the Czech Republic, 2015b. National Action Plan for the Development of the Nuclear Energy Sector in the Czech Republic. Praha.Google Scholar
Ministry of Trade and Industry of the Czech Republic, 2019. National Energy and Climate Plan of the Czech Republic. European Commission. energy.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2020-03/cs_final_necp_main_en_0.pdfGoogle Scholar
Mišík, M., 2010. Security first: energy policy in the new member states of the European Union, in: Malová, D. (Ed.), From Listening to Action: New Member States in the EU. Devín Publishing House, Bratislava, pp. 101–129.Google Scholar
Mišík, M., 2012. Crisis as remedy? The 2009 gas crisis and its influence on the increase of energy security within Visegrad Group countries. Int. Issues Slovak Foreign Policy Aff. 21, 56–72.Google Scholar
Mišík, M., 2015. The influence of perception on the preferences of the new member states of the European Union: the case of energy policy. Comp. Eur. Polit. 13, 198–221. https://doi.org/10.1057/cep.2013.9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mišík, M., 2016. On the way towards the Energy Union: position of Austria, the Czech Republic and Slovakia towards external energy security integration. Energy 111, 68–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.05.056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mišík, M., 2019. External Energy Security in the European Union: Small Member States’ Perspective. Routledge, London. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351106535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mišík, M., 2021. When the accession legacy fades away: Central and Eastern European countries and the EU renewables targets. The International Spectator 56(3), 56–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/03932729.2021.1932137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mišík, M., 2022. The EU needs to improve its external energy security. Energy Policy 165, 112930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112930CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mišík, M., Nosko, A., 2017. The Eastring gas pipeline in the context of the Central and Eastern European gas supply challenge. Nat. Energy 2, 844–848. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560–017-0019-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mišík, M., Nosko, A., 2023a. Post-pandemic lessons for EU energy and climate policy after the Russian invasion of Ukraine: introduction to a special issue on EU green recovery in the post-Covid-19 period. Energy Policy 177, 113546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113546CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mišík, M., Nosko, A., 2023b. Each one for themselves: exploring the energy security paradox of the European Union. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 99, 103074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2023.103074CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mišík, M., Oravcová, V., 2020. Energy governance in Slovakia, in: Knodt, M., Kemmerzell, J. (Eds.), Handbook of Energy Governance in Europe. Springer International, Cham, pp. 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73526-9_27–1Google Scholar
Mišík, M., Oravcová, V. (Eds.), 2021a. From Economic to Energy Transition: Three Decades of Transitions in Central and Eastern Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55085-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mišík, M., Oravcová, V., 2021b. Introduction: Central and Eastern European perspectives on energy transition, in: Mišík, M., Oravcová, V. (Eds.), From Economic to Energy Transition: Three Decades of Transitions in Central and Eastern Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, pp. 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55085-1_1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mišík, M., Oravcová, V., 2022. Ex ante governance in the European Union: energy and climate policy as a ‘test run’ for the post-pandemic recovery. Energy Policy 167, 113076. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENPOL.2022.113076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mišík, M., Prachárová, V., 2016. Before ‘independence’ arrived: interdependence in energy relations between Lithuania and Russia. Geopolitics 21, 579–604. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2015.1113402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mišík, M., Prachárová, V., 2021. Perfect compliance? Nuclear power in Central and Eastern Europe and the EU membership, in: Mišík, M., Oravcová, V. (Eds.), From Economic to Energy Transition: Three Decades of Transitions in Central and Eastern Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, pp. 429–456. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55085-1_15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mocek, P., Pieszczek, M., Swiadrowski, J., Kapusta, K., Wiatowski, M., Stanczyk, K., 2016. Pilot-scale underground coal gasification (UCG) experiment in an operating mine ‘Wieczorek’ in Poland. Energy 111, 313–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Modern Power Systems, 2016. Completion of NordBalt and LitPol closes the Baltic Ring. www.modernpowersystems.com/features/featurecompletion-of-nordbalt-and-litpol-closes-the-baltic-ring-4847289/Google Scholar
Moravcsik, A., Vachudova, M., 2005. Preferences, power and equilibrium: the causes and consequences of EU enlargement, in: Schimmelfenning, F., Sedelmeier, U. (Eds.), The Politics of European Union Enlargement: Theoretical Approaches. Routledge, London, pp. 198–209.Google Scholar
Morena, E., 2023. The climate brokers: philanthropy and the shaping of a ‘US‑compatible’ international climate regime, in: Aykut, S., Maertens, L. (Eds.), The Climatization of Global Politics. Springer International, Cham, pp. 41–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17895-5_3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, S., 2019. EU climate deal falls at summit, four countries wield the axe. Euractiv.com, 20 June. www.euractiv.com/section/energy-environment/news/eu-climate-deal-falls-at-summit-four-countries-wield-the-axe/Google Scholar
Morris, A., 2021. Is Bulgaria ready to give up coal? DW.com, 10 November. www.dw.com/en/is-bulgaria-ready-to-give-up-coal/a-59716811Google Scholar
Moscow Times, 2014. Polish miners protest against cheap Russian coal by blocking train. Moscow Times, 24 September. www.themoscowtimes.com/2014/09/24/polish-miners-protest-against-cheap-russian-coal-by-blocking-train-a39716Google Scholar
MosNews, 2005. Poland calls Baltic gas pipeline Russian German conspiracy. MosNews.com, 5 August. www.mosnews.com/money/2005/08/05/polandpipeline.shtmlGoogle Scholar
MTVSZ, 2020. Közösségi energia. https://mtvsz.hu/kozossegi-energiaGoogle Scholar
Müller, N., Teixidó, J. J., 2021. The effect of the EU ETS free allowance allocation on energy mix diversification: the case of Poland’s power sector. Clim. Policy 21, 804–822. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2020.1870914CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, W. C., 2017. Rejecting nuclear energy: from party competition accident to state doctrine, in: Müller, W. C., Thurner, P. W. (Eds.), The Politics of Nuclear Energy in Western Europe. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 98–124.Google Scholar
Müller, W. C., Thurner, P. W., 2017. The Politics of Nuclear Energy in Western Europe. Oxford University Press, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murmann, J. P., 2006. Knowledge and Competitive Advantage: The Coevolution of Firms, Technology, and National Institutions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Murphy, K., 2017. ‘Clean’ coal power plants: Matt Canavan hints at government subsidy. The Guardian, 2 February.Google Scholar
Naftogaz, 2022. Resilience. Victory. Recovery. Naftogaz Annual Report 2021. Kyiv.Google Scholar
Natorski, M., Pomorska, K., 2017. Trust and decision-making in times of crisis: the EU’s response to the events in Ukraine. JCMS J. Common Mark. Stud. 55, 54–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelsen, A., 2015. Poland’s shale gas revolution evaporates in face of environmental protests. The Guardian, 12 January.Google Scholar
Nelsen, A., Simon, F., 2012. Poland defies Europe over 2050 low-carbon roadmap. Euractiv.com, 8 March. www.euractiv.com/section/development-policy/news/poland-defies-europe-over-2050-low-carbon-roadmap/Google Scholar
Neresini, F., Lorenzet, A., 2016. Can media monitoring be a proxy for public opinion about technoscientific controversies? The case of the Italian public debate on nuclear power. Public Underst. Sci. 25, 171–185.Google ScholarPubMed
Neslen, A., 2018. Spain to close most coal mines in €250m transition deal. The Guardian, 26 October.Google Scholar
Neuman, M., 2017. The Visegrád group as a vehicle for promoting national interests in the European Union: the case of the Czech Republic. Polit. Cent. Eur. 13, 55–67. https://doi.org/10.1515/pce-2016-0022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neuwahl, N., Kovacs, C., 2021. Hungary and the EU’s rule of law protection. J. Eur. Integr. 43, 17–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2020.1717484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newell, P., Mulvaney, D., 2013. The political economy of the ‘just transition’. Geogr. J. 179, 132–140. https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newell, P., Simms, A., 2021. How did we do that? Histories and political economies of rapid and just transitions. New Polit. Econ. 26, 907–922. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2020.1810216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NGFS, 2022. Membership. www.ngfs.net/en/about-us/membershipGoogle Scholar
Normile, D., 2020. China’s bold climate pledge earns praise – but is it feasible? Science 370(6512), 17–18. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.370.6512.17CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nosko, A., 2013. Energy security in transition: coping with energy import dependence in the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Hungary. PhD dissertation, Central European University.Google Scholar
Nosko, A., Mišík, M., 2017. No united front: the political economy of energy in Central and Eastern Europe, in: Andersen, S. S., Goldthau, A., Sitter, N. (Eds.), Energy Union (pp. 201–222). Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59104-3_12Google Scholar
Notes from Poland, 2022. Support for nuclear energy in Poland almost doubles in a year [WWW Document]. https://notesfrompoland.com/2022/12/05/support-for-nuclear-energy-in-poland-almost-doubles-in-a-year/Google Scholar
Noutcheva, G., Bechev, D., 2008. The successful laggards: Bulgaria and Romania’s accession to the EU. East Eur. Polit. Soc. 22, 114–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888325407311793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novak, B., 2015. Legislative committee approves bill to classify Paks II project for 30 years. Budapest Beacon, 27 February. https://budapestbeacon.com/legislative-committee-approves-bill-classify-paks-ii-project-30-years/Google Scholar
Novinite, 2014. Chevron to Explore a Fifth Romanian Location for Shale Gas. www.novinite.com/articles/159901/Chevron+to+Explore+a+Fifth+Romanian+Location+for+Shale+GasGoogle Scholar
Novinite, 2019. Protest in front of KEVR building because of the electricity, heating and hot water price increase. www.novinite.com/articles/198227/Protest+in+front+of+KEVR+Building+Because+of+the+Electricity%2C+Heating+and+Hot+Water+Price+IncreaseGoogle Scholar
Novinite, 2021. Bulgaria may have new nuclear reactor in ten years. www.novinite.com/articles/207671/Bulgaria+May+Have+New+Nuclear+Reactor+in+Ten+YearsGoogle Scholar
Novinite, 2023. Bulgaria’s Ecominister: We are not prepared with an alternative to coal plants. www.novinite.com/articles/218653/Bulgaria’s+Ecominister%3A+We+are+Not+Prepared+with+an+Alternative+to+Coal+PlantsGoogle Scholar
Novinky.cz, 2019. Babiš: Není možné dostat klima do pozice náboženství, že se nesmí létat letadly. www.novinky.cz/clanek/domaci-babis-neni-mozne-dostat-klima-do-pozice-nabozenstvi-ze-se-nesmi-letat-letadly-40296782Google Scholar
NSE, 2009. CEZ opens public tender for contractor of nuclear units. www.nsenergybusiness.com/news/newscez_opens_public_tender_for_contractor_of_nuclear_units_090803/Google Scholar
Obama, B., 2009. Transcript: Obama’s speech on renewable energy policy. New York Times, 23 October. www.nytimes.com/2009/10/24/us/politics/24obama.text.htmlGoogle Scholar
Oberthür, S., 2016. Where to go from Paris? The European Union in climate geopolitics. Glob. Aff. 2, 119–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/23340460.2016.1166332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oberthür, S., Dupont, C., 2021. The European Union’s international climate leadership: Towards a grand climate strategy? J. Eur. Public Policy 28, 1095–1114. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2021.1918218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oberthür, S., Tänzler, D., Wright, E., Khandekar, G., 2022. European Foreign Policy in a Decarbonising World: Challenges and Opportunities. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Ocelík, P., Osička, J., Zapletalová, V., Černoch, F., Dančák, B., 2017. Local opposition and acceptance of a deep geological repository of radioactive waste in the Czech Republic: a frame analysis. Energy Policy 105, 458–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.03.025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OECD, 2022. Climate Finance Provided and Mobilised by Developed Countries in 2016–2020: Insights from Disaggregated Analysis. https://read.oecd.org/10.1787/286dae5d-en?format=pdfGoogle Scholar
Oels, A., 2013. Rendering climate change governable by risk: from probability to contingency. Geoforum 45, 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.09.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oettinger, G., 2011. Speech of Commissioner Oettinger at the Conference on the occasion of the opening of ACER Ljubljana, 3 March. European Commission Press Corner. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/SPEECH_11_145Google Scholar
Official Journal of the European Union, 2010. Regulation (EU) 994/2010. Brussels.Google Scholar
Official Journal of the European Union, 2017. Regulation (EU) 2017/1938 Concerning Measures to Safeguard the Security of Gas Supply. Brussels.Google Scholar
Official Journal of the European Union, 2018. Regulation (EU) 2018/1999 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 on the Governance of the Energy Union and Climate Action. Brussels.Google Scholar
Olabi, A. G., Onumaegbu, C., Wilberforce, T., Ramadan, M., Abdelkareem, M. A., Al-Alami, A. H., 2021. Critical review of energy storage systems. Energy 214, 118987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.118987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Open Access Government, 2019. Hungary plans to ditch coal by 2030 and become fully reliant on renewable energy. www.openaccessgovernment.org/hungary-plans-to-ditch-coal-by-2030-and-become-fully-reliant-on-renewable-energy/55057/Google Scholar
Oravcová, V., Mišík, M., 2018. EU funds and limited cooperation: energy infrastructure development in the Visegrad Group. Int. Issues Slovak Foreign Policy Aff. 27, 11–26.Google Scholar
Oravcová, V., Yakovenko, K., Mišík, M., 2022. Complete but fragmented: research on energy in Central and Eastern Europe. Energies 15(17), 6185. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15176185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orbán, K., 2016. NGOs contest Paks II permit. Budapest Beacon, 30 September. https://budapestbeacon.com/environmental-groups-to-contest-paks-ii-environmental-permit/Google Scholar
Orbán, V., 2022. Speech by Prime Minister Viktor Orbán at the 31st Bálványos Summer Free University and Student Camp. https://2015-2022.miniszterelnok.hu/speech-by-prime-minister-viktor-orban-at-the-31st-balvanyos-summer-free-university-and-student-camp/Google Scholar
Orenstein, M. A., Kelemen, R. D., 2017. Trojan horses in EU foreign policy. JCMS J. Common Mark. Stud. 55, 87–102. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orttung, R. W., Perovic, J., 2012. Energy security, in: Mauer, V., Cavelty, M. D. (Eds.), Handbook of Security Studies. Routledge, Abingdon.Google Scholar
Osička, J., Černoch, F., 2017. Anatomy of a black sheep: the roots of the Czech Republic’s pro-nuclear energy policy. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 27, 9–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.02.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osička, J., Černoch, F., 2022. European energy politics after Ukraine: the road ahead. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 91, 102757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2022.102757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osička, J., Černoch, F., Zapletalová, V., Lehotský, L., 2021. Too good to be true: sugarcoating nuclear energy in the Czech national energy strategy. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 72, 101865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osička, J., Kemmerzell, J., Zoll, M., Lehotský, L., Černoch, F., Knodt, M., 2020. What’s next for the European coal heartland? Exploring the future of coal as presented in German, Polish and Czech press. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 61, 101316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.101316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osička, J., Ocelík, P., 2017. Natural gas infrastructure and supply patterns in Eastern Europe: trends and policies. Energy Sources, Part B Econ. Planning, Policy 12, 358–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567249.2015.1136971CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrowski, W., 2020. The twenty years’ crisis of European energy security: Central and Eastern Europe and the US. Geopolitics, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2020.1835863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oudenaren, J. Van, 2001. The limits of coditionality: nuclear reactor safety in Central and Eastern Europe 1994–2001. Int. Polit. 38, 467–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Overland, I., 2019. The geopolitics of renewable energy: debunking four emerging myths. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 49, 36–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.10.018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pachocka, M., 2016. Understanding the Visegrad Group states’ response to the migrant and refugee crisis 2014+ in the European Union. Yearb. Polish Eur. Stud. 101–132.Google Scholar
Page, E. A., 2008. Distributing the burdens of climate change. Env. Polit. 17, 556–575. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010802193419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pakalkaitė, V., Posaner, J., 2019. The Baltics: between competition and cooperation, in: Godzimirski, J. M. (Ed.), New Political Economy of Energy in Europe: Power to Project, Power to Adapt. Springer International, Cham, pp. 215–237. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93360-3_9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pan, Y., 2023. Managing the atomic divorce: the challenges of East Central Europe’ s nuclear energy decoupling from Russia. Electr. J. 36, 107241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tej.2023.107241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panarello, D., Gatto, A., 2023. Decarbonising Europe: EU citizens’ perception of renewable energy transition amidst the European Green Deal. Energy Policy 172, 113272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, C. F., Karlsson, C., 2018. The UN climate change negotiations and the role of the United States: assessing American leadership from Copenhagen to Paris. Env. Polit. 27, 519–540. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2018.1442388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, C. F., Karlsson, C., Hjerpe, M., 2017. Assessing the European Union’s global climate change leadership: from Copenhagen to the Paris Agreement. J. Eur. Integr. 39, 239–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2016.1275608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paterson, M., 2021. The end of the Fossil Fuel Age’? Discourse politics and climate change political economy. New Polit. Econ. 26, 923–936. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2020.1810218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patricolo, C., 2019. Hungary to phase out coal by 2030. Emerging Europe. https://emerging-europe.com/news/hungary-to-phase-out-coal-by-2030/Google Scholar
Patricolo, C., 2022. Member states agree to reduce gas demand by 15%[WWW Document]. ceenergynews.com, 26 July. https://ceenergynews.com/eu-affairs/member-states-agree-to-reduce-gas-demand-by-15/Google Scholar
Pavlínek, P., Pickles, J., 2000. Environmental Transitions: Transformation and Ecological Defence in Central and Eastern Europe. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Pavlović, D., Banovac, E., Vištica, N., 2018. Defining a composite index for measuring natural gas supply security: the Croatian gas market case. Energy Policy 114, 30–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.11.029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pech, L., Scheppelle, K. L., 2017. Illiberalism within: rule of law backsliding in the EU. Cambridge Yearb. Eur. Leg. Stud. 19, 3–47. https://doi.org/10.1017/cel.2017.9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pelinka, A., 1983. The nuclear power referendum in Austria. Elect. Stud. 2, 253–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-3794(83)80032-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peng, D., Poudineh, R., 2019. Electricity market design under increasing renewable energy penetration: misalignments observed in the European Union. Util. Policy 61, 100970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2019.100970CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perrone, G., 2019. The Security of Natural Gas Supplies in the European Union Policy. Rome.Google Scholar
Peseckyte, G., 2022. Lithuania now fully independent of Russian energy. Euractiv.com, 24 May. www.euractiv.com/section/politics/short_news/lithuania-now-fully-independent-of-russian-energy/Google Scholar
Petit, V., 2017. The Energy Transition: An Overview of the True Challenge of the 21st Century. Springer, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petrova, S., 2014. Communities in Transition: Protected Nature and Local People in Eastern and Central Europe. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Pew, 2020. Science and scientists held in high esteem across global publics. Pew Research Center, 29 September. www.pewresearch.org/science/2020/09/29/science-and-scientists-held-in-high-esteem-across-global-publics/Google Scholar
Pickles, J., Smith, A., 1998. Theorizing Transition: The Political Economy of Post-Communist Transformations. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Piebalgs, A., 2008. Energy Security in the Baltic Sea Region Speech at the Baltic Sea Regional Business Forum. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/speech_08_296Google Scholar
Pielow, J.-C., Brunekreeft, G., Ehlers, E., 2009. Legal and economic aspects of ownership unbundling in the EU. J. World Energy Law Bus. 2, 96–116. https://doi.org/10.1093/jwelb/jwp001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, P., 2000. Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 94, 251–267. https://doi.org/10.2307/2586011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinker, A., Argüelles, L., Fischer, A., Becker, S., 2020. Between straitjacket and possibility: energy initiatives and the politics of regulation. Geoforum 113, 14–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.04.016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitel, L., 2023. German village becomes climate flashpoint over ‘painful’ coal revival. Financial Times, 11 January. www.ft.com/content/abb4e299-f10d-421a-b107-ec686c701dc2Google Scholar
Pivarnyik, B., 2017. MVM spends $3.8 million promoting Paks II. Budapest Beacon., 15 September. https://budapestbeacon.com/mvm-spends-3-8-million-promoting-paks-ii/Google Scholar
Plumer, B., 2018. Covering climate talks in the heart of Poland’s coal country. New York Times, 19 December.Google Scholar
Podoba, J., 1998. Rejecting green velvet: transition, environment and nationalism in Slovakia. Env. Polit. 7, 129–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644019808414376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polanecký, K., Haverkamp, J., 2011. Energy of the Future? Nuclear Energy in Central and Eastern Europe. Prague.Google Scholar
Polish Government, 2003. National Security Strategy. Warsaw.Google Scholar
Polish Government, 2007. National Security Strategy. Warsaw.Google Scholar
Polish Government, 2013. Strategy of Development of the National Security System of the Republic of Poland 2022. Warsaw.Google Scholar
Polish Government, 2018. Solidarity and Just Transition Declaration. Warsaw.Google Scholar
Polish Government, 2020. National Security Strategy. Warsaw.Google Scholar
Polish Presidency of the Visegrad Group, 2013. Visegrad 4 Integation & Cohesion. Warsaw.Google Scholar
Pollak, J., Schubert, S., Kreutler, M., 2016. Energy Policy of the European Union. Palgrave, London.Google Scholar
Pollitt, M. G., 2012. The role of policy in energy transitions: lessons from the energy liberalisation era. Energy Policy 50, 128–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.03.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollitt, M. G., 2019. The European single market in electricity: an economic assessment. Rev. Ind. Organ. 55, 63–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151–019-09682-wCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polska Zielona Sieć, 2014. Czeczott power plant open letter to Mitsui. http://dlaklimatu.pl/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Czeczott-power-plant-open-letter-to-Mitsui-FINAL.pdfGoogle Scholar
PolskieRadio, 2008. European Parliament passes report critical of North Stream. www2.polskieradio.pl/eo/dokument.aspx?iid=86547Google Scholar
Popp, R., 2019. A just transition of European coal regions. E3G. https://justtransitionforall.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/E3G_2019_Stakeholder_Mappings_European_Coal_Regions_Final-1.pdfGoogle Scholar
Portela, C., Pospieszna, P., Skrzypczyńska, J., Walentek, D., 2021. Consensus against all odds: explaining the persistence of EU sanctions on Russia. J. Eur. Integr. 43, 683–699. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2020.1803854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pöyry Management Consulting, 2018. Independent Economic Analysis of the Long-Term Liquefied Natural Gas Import Solution to the Republic of Lithuania. Oxford.Google Scholar
PPCA, 2022. PPCA members. Powering Past Coal Alliance. www.poweringpastcoal.org/membersGoogle Scholar
PPCA, 2023. Our Members. Powering Past Coal Alliance. https://poweringpastcoal.org/members/Google Scholar
Praks, P., Kopustinskas, V., 2019. Node importance analysis of a gas transmission network with evaluation of a new infrastructure by ProGasNet, in: Luiijf, E., Žutautaitė, I., Hämmerli, B. M. (Eds.), Critical Information Infrastructures Security. Springer International, Cham, pp. 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prăvălie, R., Bandoc, G., 2018. Nuclear energy: between global electricity demand, worldwide decarbonisation imperativeness, and planetary environmental implications. J. Environ. Manage. 209, 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.12.043CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Preussen, W., 2022. Hungary signs new gas deal with Gazprom. Politico, 31 August. www.politico.eu/article/hungary-signs-deal-with-gazprom-over-additional-gas/Google Scholar
Prontera, A., Plenta, P., 2020. Catalytic Power Europe and gas infrastructural policy in the Visegrad countries. Energy Policy 137, 111189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PWEA, 2019. Customers will select RES: less expensive and cleaner. http://psew.pl/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Przysz%C5%82o%C5%9B%C4%87-morskiej-energetyki-wiatrowej-w-Polsce-raport.pdfGoogle Scholar
PWEA, 2020. Wind of hope for Poland’s Green Deal. http://psew.pl/en/2020/08/25/wind-of-hope-for-polands-green-deal/Google Scholar
Radio Free Europe, 2019. Bulgaria seeks funding for second nuclear power plant. www.rferl.org/a/bulgaria-seeks-funding-for-second-nuclear-power-plant/29815609.htmlGoogle Scholar
Ragwitz, M., Steinhilber, S., Breitschopf, B., Resch, G., Panzer, C., Ortner, A., Busch, S., 2012. Shaping an Effective and Efficient European Renewable Energy Market. Karlsruhe.Google Scholar
Rahvaalgatus, , 2017. Eesti vajab põlevkivienergeetikast väljumise strateegiat ehk PÕXITit. https://rahvaalgatus.ee/initiatives/e05abc15-5e49-4205-bfb3-520ed6caf057Google Scholar
Ralev, R., 2021. Slovenia to complete coal phase-out by 2033 – govt minister. SEE News. https://seenews.com/news/slovenia-to-complete-coal-phase-out-by-2033-govt-minister-753858Google Scholar
Rankin, J., 2018. EU settles seven-year Gazprom dispute without imposing fine. The Guardian, 24 May.Google Scholar
Rankin, J., 2021. EU considers natural gas purchase in response to surging energy prices. The Guardian, 12 October.Google Scholar
Rankin, J., 2022. Hungary ‘holding EU hostage’ over sanctions on Russian oil. The Guardian, 16 May.Google Scholar
Rečka, L., Ščasný, M., 2016. Impacts of carbon pricing, brown coal availability and gas cost on Czech energy system up to 2050. Energy 108, 19–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.12.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rečka, L., Ščasný, M., 2017. Impacts of reclassified brown coal reserves on the energy system and deep decarbonisation target in the Czech Republic. Energies 10(12), 1947. https://doi.org/10.3390/en10121947CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rečka, L., Ščasný, M., 2018. Brown coal and nuclear energy deployment: effects on fuel-mix, carbon targets, and external costs in the Czech Republic up to 2050. Fuel 216, 494–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2017.12.034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reclaim Finance, 2023. Throwing fuel on the fire: GFANZ financing of fossil fuel expansion. https://reclaimfinance.org/site/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Throwing-fuel-on-the-fire-GFANZ-financing-of-fossil-fuel-expansion.pdfGoogle Scholar
Reed, S., 2022. Britain approves new coal mine despite climate concerns. New York Times, 8 December.Google Scholar
REKK, 2018. Self-Assessment and Development Options for the Slovenian Gas Wholesale Market. Budapest.Google Scholar
Renn, O., Marshall, J. P., 2016. Coal, nuclear and renewable energy policies in Germany: from the 1950s to the ‘Energiewende.’ Energy Policy 99, 224–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.05.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
RESCOOP, 2023. Our members. www.rescoop.eu/membersGoogle Scholar
Reuters, 2012a. Romanian coal miners protest over pay. 8 March.Google Scholar
Reuters, 2012b. Bulgarians protest, seek moratorium on shale gas. 14 January.Google Scholar
Reuters, 2013. Update 1: Poland says will not tax shale gas output until 2020. 22 May.Google Scholar
Reuters, 2016a. Polish firms concede defeat in search for shale gas riches. 12 October.Google Scholar
Reuters, 2016b. EU’s anti-monopoly case against Russia’s Gazprom. 25 October.Google Scholar
Reuters, 2018a. Slovak court orders detained Greenpeace activists to stay in custody. 2 December.Google Scholar
Reuters, 2018b. Bulgarian miners march to protect coal production. 29 November.Google Scholar
Reuters, 2019. Bulgaria seeks investors to build Belene nuclear plant. 11 March.Google Scholar
Reuters, 2020. France’s Macron says nuclear will remain key energy source. 8 December.Google Scholar
Reuters, 2021a. Hoping for cheaper gas to come, Europe reverses Russian link to tap storage. 30 December.Google Scholar
Reuters, 2021b. Hungary gets 5-year payment delay on Russian-led nuclear plant project. 29 April (corrected).Google Scholar
Reuters, 2021c. EU climate policy risks sidelining nuclear power, seven countries say. 24 March.Google Scholar
Reuters, 2021d. Estonian prime minister pledges break with far-right past. 26 January.Google Scholar
Reuters, 2022a. China’s overseas coal ban sees 15 projects cancelled. 21 April.Google Scholar
Reuters, 2022b. Japan turns back to nuclear power to tackle energy crisis. 16 December.Google Scholar
Reuters, 2023. Bulgarian lawmakers back coal plants with vote to roll back green targets. 12 January.Google Scholar
RFERL, 2006. EU criticizes Poland’s Nazi pipeline comment. Radio Free Europe Radio Liberty. www.rferl.org/content/article/1068083.htmlGoogle Scholar
RFERL, 2022. Orban requests increase in Russian gas imports during meeting with Putin. Radio Free Europe Radio Liberty. www.rferl.org/a/hungary-orban-putin-russia-gas/31681502.htmlGoogle Scholar
Rilska, B., 2012. The Price of Gas Remains Unclear Three Days before the Signing of the Contract with ‘Gazprom.’ Dnevnik.Google Scholar
Ritchie, H., Roser, M., 2022. Electricity mix. Our World in Data. https://ourworldindata.org/electricity-mixGoogle Scholar
Rixen, T., Viola, L. A., 2014. Putting path dependence in its place: toward a taxonomy of institutional change. J. Theor. Polit. 27, 301–323. https://doi.org/10.1177/0951629814531667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rockström, J., Gaffney, O., Rogelj, J., Meinshausen, M., Nakicenovic, N., Schellnhuber, H. J., 2017. A roadmap for rapid decarbonization. Science 355(6331), 1269–1271. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aah3443CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rodríguez-Fernández, L., Fernández Carvajal, A. B., Ruiz-Gómez, L. M., 2020. Evolution of European Union’s energy security in gas supply during Russia–Ukraine gas crises (2006–2009). Energy Strateg. Rev. 30, 100518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2020.100518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodríguez-Gómez, N., Zaccarelli, N., Bolado-Lavín, R., 2016. European ability to cope with a gas crisis: comparison between 2009 and 2014. Energy Policy 97, 461–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.07.016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roeben, V., 2018. Towards a European Energy Union: European Energy Strategy in International Law. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316529720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohracher, H., Späth, P., 2013. The interplay of urban energy policy and socio-technical transitions: the eco-cities of Graz and Freiburg in retrospect. Urban Stud. 51, 1415–1431. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098013500360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rojey, A., 2009. Energy and Climate: How to Achieve a Successful Energy Transition. Wiley, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romanian Government, 2007. National Security Strategy. Bucharest.Google Scholar
Romanian Government, 2016. Romanian Energy Strategy 2016–2030, with an Outlook to 2050 (Executive Summary). Sofia.Google Scholar
Romanian Government, 2020. National Defence Strategy 2020–2024. Bucharest.Google Scholar
Rosen, A. M., 2015. The wrong solution at the right time: the failure of the Kyoto protocol on climate change. Polit. Policy 43, 30–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosslowe, C., 2020. EU ETS emissions 2019: Europe’s coal power collapse exposes steel plants as Europe’s biggest emitters. Ember, 7 April. https://ember-climate.org/insights/research/eu-ets-emissions-2019/Google Scholar
Roth, M., 2011. Poland as a policy entrepreneur in European external energy policy: Towards greater energy solidarity vis-à-vis Russia? Geopolitics 16, 600–625. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2011.520865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruble, I., 2017. European Union energy supply security: the benefits of natural gas imports from the Eastern Mediterranean. Energy Policy 105, 341–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.03.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruiz, I. B., 2018. Lobbyists push fossil fuels at COP24. DW, 12 December. www.dw.com/en/lobbyists-push-fossil-fuels-at-climate-talks/a-46671775Google Scholar
Rumelt, R. P., 1995. Inertia and transformation, in: Montgomery, C. A. (Ed.), Resource-Based and Evolutionary Theories of the Firm: Towards a Synthesis. Springer US, Boston, pp. 101–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2201-0_5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russian Government, 2009. Energy Strategy of Russia for the Period up to 2030. Moscow.Google Scholar
Ruzzenenti, F., Wagner, A., 2018. Efficiency and the rebound effect in the hegemonic discourse on energy. Nat. Cult. 13, 356–377. https://doi.org/10.3167/nc.2018.130303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rybak, A., Rybak, A., 2021. Methods of ensuring energy security with the use of hard coal: the case of Poland. Energies 14(18), 5609. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14185609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saad, L., 2022. Americans divided on nuclear energy. Gallup, 20 May. https://news.gallup.com/poll/392831/americans-divided-nuclear-energy.aspxGoogle Scholar
Sadurski, W., 2004. Accession’s democracy dividend: the impact of the EU enlargement upon democracy in the new member states of Central and Eastern Europe. Eur. Law J. 10, 371–401. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2004.00222.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saether, B., Isaksen, A., Karlsen, A., 2011. Innovation by co-evolution in natural resource industries: the Norwegian experience. Geoforum 42, 373–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.01.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sánchez Nicolás, E., 2022. Campaigners challenge €13bn proposed gas projects. EUobserver, 7 June. https://euobserver.com/green-economy/155114Google Scholar
Sarlos, G., 2015. Risk perception and political alienism. Cent. Eur. J. Public Policy 8, 93–111.Google Scholar
Sarrica, M., Brondi, S., Cottone, P., Mazzara, B. M., 2016. One, no one, one hundred thousand energy transitions in Europe: the quest for a cultural approach. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 13, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2015.12.019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sattich, T., Morgan, R., Moe, E., 2022. Searching for energy independence, finding renewables? Energy security perceptions and renewable energy policy in Lithuania. Polit. Geogr. 96, 102656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2022.102656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sauer, N., 2019. Poland’s coal miners: ‘EU climate proposals terrify us’. ClimateHomeNews.com, 24 September. www.climatechangenews.com/2018/09/24/poland-coal-miners-eu/Google Scholar
Schimmelfennig, F., 2001. The community trap: liberal norms, rhetorical action, and the eastern enlargement of the European Union. Int. Organ. 55, 47–80. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081801551414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schimmelfennig, F., 2005. Strategic calculation and international socialization: membership incentives, party constellations, and sustained compliance in Central and Eastern Europe. Int. Organ. 59, 827–860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schimmelfennig, F., Sedelmeier, U., 2004. Governance by conditionality: EU rule transfer to the candidate countries of Central and Eastern Europe. J. Eur. Public Policy 11, 661–679. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350176042000248089CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schimmelfennig, F., Sedelmeier, U., 2005. Europeanization of Central and Eastern Europe. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Schmidt, A., 2020. From Intermarium to the Three Seas Initiative: the implications of the Polish orientation over the Central and Eastern European region on Hungarian foreign policy, in: Bogdanova, O., Makarychev, A. (Eds.), Baltic-Black Sea Regionalisms: Patchworks and Networks at Europe’s Eastern Margins. Springer International, Cham, pp. 149–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24878-9_10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt-Felzmann, A., 2008. All for one? EU member states and the Union’s common policy towards the Russian Federation. J. Contemp. Eur. Stud. 16, 169–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/14782800802309771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt-Felzmann, A., 2011. EU member states’ energy relations with Russia: conflicting approaches to securing natural gas supplies. Geopolitics 16, 574–599. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2011.520864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt-Felzmann, A., 2018. The Commercial Deals Connected with Gazprom’s Nord Stream 2: A Review of Strings and Benefits Attached to the Controversial Russian Pipelines. Warsaw.Google Scholar
Schreiber, P., Pinson, L., Can Ileri, E., Jeandon, J., 2020. Behind the curtains: when the gas and nuclear lobbies reshape the EU sustainable taxonomy. ReclaimFinance.org media briefing, August. https://reclaimfinance.org/site/en/2020/08/25/behind-the-curtains-when-the-gas-and-nuclear-lobbies-reshape-the-eu-sustainable-taxonomy/Google Scholar
Schubert, D. K. J., Thuß, S., Möst, D., 2015. Does political and social feasibility matter in energy scenarios? Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 7, 43–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2015.03.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scislowska, M., 2018. Ahead of climate talks, Poles are divided over coal mining. AP News, 27 November. https://apnews.com/article/coal-mining-international-news-katowice-science-technology-15b849ca072f47f7b79e220d32b28124Google Scholar
Sedelmeier, U., 2005. Constructing the Path to Eastern Enlargement: The Uneven Policy Impact of EU Identity. Manchester University Press, Manchester.Google Scholar
Sedelmeier, U., 2011. Europeanisation in new member and candidate states. Living Rev. Eur. Gov. 6, 1–52. https://doi.org/10.12942/lreg-2006-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedelmeier, U., 2012. Is Europeanisation through conditionality sustainable? Lock-in of institutional change after EU accession. West European Politics 35, 20–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2012.631311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segal, S., Bertez, C. 2021. Drilling down on Treasury’s new fossil fuel energy guidance for multilateral development banks. CSIS, 19 August. www.csis.org/analysis/drilling-down-treasurys-new-fossil-fuel-energy-guidance-multilateral-development-banksGoogle Scholar
Selei, A., Takácsné Tóth, B., 2022. A modelling-based assessment of EU supported natural gas projects of common interest. Energy Policy 166, 113045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sencar, M., Pozeb, V., Krope, T., 2014. Development of EU (European Union) energy market agenda and security of supply. Energy 77, 117–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.05.031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seputyte, M., 2014. Lithuania grabs LNG in effort to curb Russian dominance. Bloomberg, 27 October. www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2014-10-27/lithuania-grabs-lng-in-effort-to-curb-russian-dominance#xj4y7vzkgGoogle Scholar
Seyfang, G., Park, J. J., Smith, A., 2013. A thousand flowers blooming? An examination of community energy in the UK. Energy Policy 61, 977–989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.06.030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shearer, C., 2019. How plans for new coal are changing around the world. CarbonBrief.org, 13 August. www.carbonbrief.org/guest-post-how-plans-for-new-coal-are-changing-around-the-world/Google Scholar
Shearer, C., Fofrich, R., Davis, S. J., 2017. Future CO2 emissions and electricity generation from proposed coal-fired power plants in India. Earth’s Futur. 5, 408–416. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017EF000542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shotter, J., Huber, E., 2019. Can Poland wean itself off coal? Financial Times, 3 May. www.ft.com/content/674ce754-6b9b-11e9-80c7-60ee53e6681dGoogle Scholar
Siddi, M., 2017. The EU’s gas relationship with Russia: solving current disputes and strengthening energy security. Asia Eur. J. 15, 107–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10308-016-0452-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siderius, K., 2022. An unexpected climate activist: central banks and the politics of the climate-neutral economy. J. Eur. Public Policy, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2022.2093948CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sikorski, R., 2012. Minister of Foreign Affairs Annual Address 2012. Warsaw.Google Scholar
Sillak, S., Kanger, L., 2020. Global pressures vs. local embeddedness: the de- and restabilization of the Estonian oil shale industry in response to climate change (1995–2016). Environ. Innov. Soc. Transitions 34, 96–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.12.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siqueira, D. S., de Almeida Meystre, J., Hilário, M. Q., Rocha, D. H. D., Menon, G. J., da Silva, R. J., 2019. Current perspectives on nuclear energy as a global climate change mitigation option. Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Chang. 24, 749–777. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027–018-9829-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sivek, M., Jirásek, J., Kavina, P., Vojnarová, M., Kurková, T., Bašová, A., 2020. Divorce after hundreds of years of marriage: prospects for coal mining in the Czech Republic with regard to the European Union. Energy Policy 142, 111524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sivek, M., Vlček, T., Kavina, P., Jirásek, J., 2017. Lifting lignite mining limits: correction of the Czech Republic energy policy. Energy Sources, Part B Econ. Planning, Policy 12, 519–525. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567249.2016.1219789CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sjursen, H., Rosén, G., 2017. Arguing sanctions: on the EU’s response to the crisis in Ukraine. JCMS J. Common Mark. Stud. 55, 20–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skalamera, M., 2018. Revisiting the Nabucco Debacle. Probl. Post-Communism 65, 18–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/10758216.2016.1188015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skjaerseth, J. B., 2015. EU climate and energy policy: demanded or supplied?, in: Bang, G., Underdal, A., Andresen, S. (Eds.), The Domestic Politics of Global Climate Change: Key Actors in International Climate Cooperation. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.Google Scholar
Skjaerseth, J. B., 2016. Linking EU climate and energy policies: policy-making, implementation and reform. Int. Environ. Agreements Polit. Law Econ. 16, 509–523. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784–014-9262-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skjaerseth, J. B., 2018. Implementing EU climate and energy policies in Poland: policy feedback and reform. Env. Polit. 27, 498–518. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2018.1429046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skjaerseth, J. B., 2021. Towards a European Green Deal: the evolution of EU climate and energy policy mixes. Int. Environ. Agreements Polit. Law Econ. 21, 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784–021-09529-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skjaerseth, J. B., Eikeland, P. O., Gulbrandsen, L. H., Jevnaker, T., 2016. Linking EU Climate and Energy Policies: Decision-Making, Implementation and Reform. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781785361289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skjaerseth, J. B., Wettestad, J., 2008. Implementing EU emissions trading: Success or failure? Int. Environ. Agreements Polit. Law Econ. 8, 275–290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784–008-9068-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skjaerseth, J. B., Wettestad, J., 2010. Fixing the EU emissions trading system? Understanding the post-2012 changes. Glob. Environ. Polit. 10, 101–123. https://doi.org/10.1162/GLEP_a_00033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skovgaard, J., 2013. The limits of entrapment: the negotiations on EU reduction targets, 2007–11. JCMS J. Common Mark. Stud. 51, 1141–1157. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skovgaard, J., 2014. EU climate policy after the crisis. Env. Polit. 23, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2013.818304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slovak Government, 2005. Security Strategy of the Slovak Republic 2005. Bratislava.Google Scholar
Slovak Government, 2019. Európskej únii chýba vízia, zhodli sa P. Pellegrini a A. Babiš. Bratislava.Google Scholar
Slovak Ministry of Economy, 2019. Integrated National Energy and Climate Plan for 2021 to 2030. Bratislava.Google Scholar
Slovenia Times, 2019. Ministry with proposal for community-owned solar power plants. https://sloveniatimes.com/ministry-with-proposal-for-community-owned-solar-power-plants/Google Scholar
Slovenian Government, 2010. National Security Strategy. Ljubljana.Google Scholar
Slovenian Government, 2022. Slovenia concludes deal on the supply of natural gas from Algeria. Republic of Slovenia, 15 November. www.gov.si/en/news/2022-11-15-slovenia-concludes-deal-on-the-supply-of-natural-gas-from-algeria/Google Scholar
Sydney Morning Herald, 2009. EU warns Slovakia against reopening nuclear plant. 13 January. www.smh.com.au/world/eu-warns-slovakia-against-reopening-nuclear-plant-20090113-7fbz.htmlGoogle Scholar
Smil, V., 2003. Energy at the Crossroads: Global Perspectives and Uncertainties. MIT Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smil, V., 2008. Moore’s curse and the great energy delusion. AEI.org, 19 November. www.aei.org/articles/moores-curse-and-the-great-energy-delusion/Google Scholar
Smil, V., 2016. Examining energy transitions: a dozen insights based on performance. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 22, 194–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2016.08.017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, A., Stirling, A., Berkhout, F., 2005. The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions. Res. Policy 34, 1491–1510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.07.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sokołowski, J., Frankowski, J., Mazurkiewicz, J., Lewandowski, P., 2022. Hard coal phase-out and the labour market transition pathways: the case of Poland. Environ. Innov. Soc. Transitions 43, 80–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2022.03.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorbello, P., Oliva, E., 2012. Nuclear energy in Bulgaria: strategic implications for the EU and Russia. Eur. Perspect. 4, 35–55.Google Scholar
Sotirov, M., Lovric, M., Winkel, G., 2015. Symbolic transformation of environmental governance: implementation of EU biodiversity policy in Bulgaria and Croatia between Europeanization and domestic politics. Environ. Plan. C Gov. Policy 33, 986–1004. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263774X15605925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sovacool, B. K., 2014. Cornucopia or curse? Reviewing the costs and benefits of shale gas hydraulic fracturing (fracking). Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 37, 249–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.04.068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sovacool, B. K., 2016. How long will it take? Conceptualizing the temporal dynamics of energy transitions. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 13, 202–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2015.12.020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sovacool, B. K., Cooper, C., Parenteau, P., 2011. From a hard place to a rock: questioning the energy security of a coal-based economy. Energy Policy 39, 4664–4670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.04.065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sovacool, B. K., Dworkin, M. H., 2014. Global Energy Justice: Problems, Principles, and Practices. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sovacool, B. K., Heffron, R. J., McCauley, D., Goldthau, A., 2016. Energy decisions reframed as justice and ethical concerns. Nat. Energy 1, 16024. https://doi.org/10.1038/nenergy.2016.24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spasić, V., 2020. Slovenia to phase out coal by 2050 – draft NECP. Balkan Green Energy News, 7 February. https://balkangreenenergynews.com/slovenia-to-phase-out-coal-by-2050-draft-necp/Google Scholar
Spencer, T., Fazekas, D., 2013. Distributional choices in EU climate policy: 20 years of policy practice. Clim. Policy 13, 240–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2013.745111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spendzharova, A., Versluis, E., 2013. Issue salience in the European policy process: What impact on transposition? J. Eur. Public Policy 20, 1499–1516. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2013.781802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sperling, J., Webber, M., 2019. The European Union: security governance and collective securitisation. West Eur. Polit. 42, 228–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2018.1510193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Šprajc, P., Bjegović, M., Vasić, B., 2019. Energy security in decision making and governance: methodological analysis of energy trilemma index. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 114, 109341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.109341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stapczynski, S., 2022. Most Japanese back nuclear for first time since Fukushima. Bloomberg, 27 March. www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-03-28/most-japanese-back-nuclear-power-for-first-time-since-fukushima#xj4y7vzkgGoogle Scholar
Statista, 2023. Share of gas supply from Russia in Europe in 2021, by selected country. www.statista.com/statistics/1201743/russian-gas-dependence-in-europe-by-country/Google Scholar
Stefanini, S., 2018a. Hungary wants end to coal power by 2030. Climate Home News, 20 November. www.climatechangenews.com/2018/11/20/hungary-wants-end-coal-power-2030/Google Scholar
Stefanini, S., 2018b. Big coal no more: the industry once ruled Europe. Now it’s struggling to survive. Politico, 20 March. www.politico.eu/article/coal-lobby-electricity-energy-union-big-coal-no-more/Google Scholar
Steffen, B., Patt, A., 2022. A historical turning point? Early evidence on how the Russia-Ukraine war changes public support for clean energy policies. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 91, 102758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2022.102758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinmo, S., Thelen, K. A., Longstreth, F., 1992. Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, J. P., 1998. Competition and Liberalization in European Gas Markets: Towards a Continental European Model. London.Google Scholar
Stop Elektrowni Północ, 2022. About us. https://stopep.org/Google Scholar
Streeck, W., Thelen, K., 2005. Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Industrial Economies. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Štreimikienė, D., 2016. Review of financial support from EU Structural Funds to sustainable energy in Baltic States. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 58, 1027–1038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Streimikiene, D., Ciegis, R., Grundey, D., 2007. Energy indicators for sustainable development in Baltic States. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 11, 877–893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2005.06.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stritzel, H., 2007. Towards a theory of securitization: Copenhagen and beyond. Eur. J. Int. Relations 13, 357–383. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066107080128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stulberg, A. N., 2015. Out of gas? Russia, Ukraine, Europe, and the changing geopolitics of natural gas. Probl. Post-Communism 62, 112–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/10758216.2015.1010914CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sugiura, E., Inagaki, K., 2022. Japan approves nuclear energy U-turn to avert crisis. Financial Times, 22 December.Google Scholar
Sullivan, F., 2016. Lavrov’s Budapest visit: Hungary urges ‘pragmatic cooperation’ between EU and Russia. Hungary Today, 26 May. https://hungarytoday.hu/lavrovs-budapest-visit-hungary-urges-pragmatic-cooperation-eu-russia-62653/Google Scholar
Supreme Audit Office, 2017. Funkcjonowanie górnictwa węgla kamiennego w latach 2007–2015 na tle założeń programu rządowego. Warsaw.Google Scholar
Sýkora, L., Bouzarovski, S., 2012. Multiple transformations. Urban Stud. 49, 43–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szabo, J., Fabok, M., 2020. Infrastructures and state-building: comparing the energy politics of the European Commission with the governments of Hungary and Poland. Energy Policy 138, 111253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szczerbiak, A., 2011. Poland within the European Union: New Awkward Partner or New Heart of Europe? Routledge, Abingdon.Google Scholar
Szép, V., 2020. New intergovernmentalism meets EU sanctions policy: the European Council orchestrates the restrictive measures imposed against Russia. J. Eur. Integr. 42, 855–871. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2019.1688316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szőke, E., 2023. Hungary to loosen its rules on deployment of wind turbines. ceenergynews.com, 9 February. https://ceenergynews.com/renewables/hungary-to-loosen-its-rules-on-deployment-of-wind-turbines/Google Scholar
Szul, R., 2011. Geopolitics of natural gas supply in Europe: Poland between the EU and Russia. Eur. Spat. Res. Policy 18, 47–67. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10105–011-0012-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szulecka, J., Szulecki, K., 2022. Between domestic politics and ecological crises: (de)legitimization of Polish environmentalism. Env. Polit. 31, 1214–1243. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2019.1674541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szulecki, K., 2018a. Conceptualizing energy democracy. Env. Polit. 27, 21–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2017.1387294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szulecki, K. (Ed.), 2018b. Energy Security in Europe: Divergent Perceptions and Policy Challenges. Palgrave Macmillan, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szulecki, K., 2020. Securitization and state encroachment on the energy sector: politics of exception in Poland’s energy governance. Energy Policy 136, 111066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szulecki, K., Fischer, S., Gullberg, A. T., Sartor, O., 2016. Shaping the ‘Energy Union’: between national positions and governance innovation in EU energy and climate policy. Clim. Policy 16, 548–567. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2015.1135100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szulecki, K., Kusznir, J., 2018. Energy security and energy transition: securitisation in the electricity sector, in: Szulecki, K. (Ed.), Energy Security in Europe: Divergent Perceptions and Policy Challenges. Springer International, Cham, pp. 117–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64964-1_5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szulecki, K., Overland, I., 2020. Energy democracy as a process, an outcome and a goal: a conceptual review. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 69, 101768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szulecki, K., Overland, I., 2023 . Russian nuclear energy diplomacy and its implications for energy security in the context of the war in Ukraine. Nat. Energy 8, 413–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szulecki, K., Szulecka, J., 2017. Polish Environmental Movement 1980–2017: (De)legitimization, politics & ecological crises (No. 6 – November 2017), ESPRi Working Paper.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talus, K., 2012. Winds of change: long-term gas contracts and changing energy paradigms in the European Union, in: Kuzemko, C., Belyi, A. V., Goldthau, A., Keating, M. F. (Eds.), Dynamics of Energy Governance in Europe and Russia. Palgrave Macmillan UK, London, pp. 227–242. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230370944_12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, K., 2022a. Germany, Netherlands call for joint EU gas purchasing ahead of next winters. Euractiv.com, 12 October. www.euractiv.com/section/energy/news/germany-netherlands-call-for-joint-eu-gas-purchasing-ahead-of-next-winters/Google Scholar
Taylor, K., 2022b. EU-27 approves demand gas reduction plan after power struggle with Brussels. Euractiv.com, 26 July. www.euractiv.com/section/energy/news/eu-27-approves-demand-gas-reduction-plan-after-power-struggle-with-brussels/Google Scholar
Taylor, S., 2006. Aggressive Poles lose friends and influence. Politico, 22 March. www.politico.eu/article/aggressive-poles-lose-friends-and-influence/Google Scholar
Tchalakov, I., Hristov, I., 2019. The Bulgarian nuclear sector in transition: adopted Russian technology, state sovereignty and accession to the EU. Environ. Innov. Soc. Transitions 32, 107–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.03.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tchalakov, I., Mitev, T., 2019. Energy dependence behind the Iron Curtain: the Bulgarian experience. Energy Policy 126, 47–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.11.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Temper, L., Avila, S., Bene, D. Del, Gobby, J., Kosoy, N., Billon, P. Le, Martinez-Alier, J., Perkins, P., Roy, B., Scheidel, A., Walter, M., 2020. Movements shaping climate futures: a systematic mapping of protests against fossil fuel and low-carbon energy projects. Environ. Res. Lett. 15. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abc197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thaler, P., Pakalkaite, V., 2021. Governance through real-time compliance: the supranationalisation of European external energy policy. J. Eur. Public Policy 28, 208–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2020.1712462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, N., 2016. Czech coal group OKD files for insolvency. Financial Times, 3 May.Google Scholar
Tidey, A., 2022. Ukraine war: Hungary comparing EU sanctions on Russia to bombs is ‘inappropriate’. Euronews, 19 October. www.euronews.com/my-europe/2022/10/19/hungary-comparing-eu-sanctions-on-russia-to-bombs-is-inappropriate-says-eu-commissionGoogle Scholar
Todorov, S., 2020. Bulgaria protesters take to streets over new environment threat. Balkan Insight, 26 June. https://balkaninsight.com/2020/06/26/bulgaria-protesters-take-to-streets-over-new-environment-threat/Google Scholar
Törőcsik, Á., Selei, A., 2018. Cross-Border Energy Cooperation in Central Europe: The Case of Hungary. Budapest.Google Scholar
Toshkov, D. D., 2017. The impact of the Eastern enlargement on the decision-making capacity of the European Union. J. Eur. Public Policy 24, 177–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2016.1264081CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tosun, J., 2011. When the grace period is over: assessing the new member states’ compliance with EU requirements for oil stockholding. Energy Policy 39, 7156–7164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.08.035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tosun, J., Biesenbender, S., Schulze, K., 2015. Energy Policy Making in the EU: Building the Agenda. Springer-Verlag, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tranter, B., Booth, K., 2015. Scepticism in a changing climate: a cross-national study. Glob. Environ. Chang. 33, 154–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.05.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treib, O., 2014. Implementing and complying with EU governance outputs. Living Rev. Eur. Gov. 9, 1–47. https://doi.org/10.12942/lreg-2014-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trokoudi, A., 2017. The security of gas supply under the (EU) Regulation 994/2010 and the recent proposal for its amendment, in: Hancher, L., Metaxas, A. (Eds.), EU Energy Law and Policy: A South European Perspective. Claeys and Casteels, Deventer.Google Scholar
Tromans, S., 2019. State support for nuclear new build. J. World Energy Law Bus. 12, 36–51. https://doi.org/10.1093/jwelb/jwy035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsebelis, G., 2002. Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsiropoulos, I., Nijs, W., Tarvydas, D., Ruiz Castello, P., 2020. Towards net-zero emissions in the EU energy system by 2050, JRC Technical Reports. https://doi.org/10.2760/081488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tusk, D., 2014. A united Europe can end Russia’s energy stranglehold. Financial Times, 21 April.Google Scholar
Tutak, M., Brodny, J., 2022. Renewable energy consumption in economic sectors in the EU-27: the impact on economics, environment and conventional energy sources. A 20-year perspective. J. Clean. Prod. 345, 131076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
TVP World, 2018. Shale gas extraction in Poland unprofitable: finance ministry. 29 November.Google Scholar
UK and CR non-paper, 2015. European Governance of EU Energy Policy goals.Google Scholar
UK Government, 2014. Estimated Impacts of Energy and Climate Change Policies on Energy Prices and Bills: 2014. London.Google Scholar
UK Government, 2021. Fact Sheet: Net Zero-Aligned Financial Centre. London.Google Scholar
Ullman, R. H., 1983. Redefining security. Int. Secur. 8, 129–153. https://doi.org/10.2307/2538489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
UN, 1992. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. New York.Google Scholar
UN, 1997. Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework on Climate Change. New York.Google Scholar
UN, 2015. Paris Agreement. New York.Google Scholar
UN, 2021a. Global coal to clean power transition statement. UN Climate Change Conference UK 2021. https://ukcop26.org/global-coal-to-clean-power-transition-statement/Google Scholar
UN, 2021b. Addendum to the Emissions Gap Report 2021. New York.Google Scholar
UN, 2022a. The Closing Window: Climate Crisis Calls for Rapid Transformation of Societies. Emissions Gap Report 2022. United Nations Environment Programme. https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/40874/EGR2022.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=yGoogle Scholar
UN, 2022b. Sharm el-Sheikh Implementation Plan. New York.Google Scholar
UN, 2023. National Determined Contributions. https://climatepromise.undp.org/news-and-stories/NDCs-nationally-determined-contributions-climate-change-what-you-need-to-knowGoogle Scholar
UNEP, 2015. The Financial System We Need. New York.Google Scholar
UNFCCC, 2016. Just Transition of the Workforce, and the Creation of Decent Work and Quality Jobs. New York.Google Scholar
Unruh, G. C., 2000. Understanding carbon lock-in. Energy Policy 28, 817–830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ürge-Vorsatz, D., Miladinova, G., Paizs, L., 2006. Energy in transition: from the Iron Curtain to the European Union. Energy Policy 34, 2279–2297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ürge-Vorsatz, D., Tirado Herrero, S., 2012. Building synergies between climate change mitigation and energy poverty alleviation. Energy Policy 49, 83–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valdés Lucas, J. N., Escribano Francés, G., San Martín González, E., 2016. Energy security and renewable energy deployment in the EU: liaisons dangereuses or virtuous circle? Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 62, 1032–1046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van de Graaf, T., Haesebrouck, T., Debaere, P., 2018. Fractured politics? The comparative regulation of shale gas in Europe. J. Eur. Public Policy 25, 1276–1293. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1301985CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van der Vleuten, E., 2004. Infrastructures and societal change: a view from the large technical systems field. Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag. 16, 395–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/0953732042000251160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Eck, C. W., Feindt, P. H., 2022. Parallel routes from Copenhagen to Paris: climate discourse in climate sceptic and climate activist blogs. J. Environ. Policy Plan. 24, 194–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2021.2000376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Munster, R., 2009. Securitizing Immigration, Securitizing Immigration. Palgrave Macmillan UK, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Veelen, B., van der Horst, D., 2018. What is energy democracy? Connecting social science energy research and political theory. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 46, 19–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanegas Cantarero, M. M., 2020. Of renewable energy, energy democracy, and sustainable development: a roadmap to accelerate the energy transition in developing countries. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 70, 101716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanhercke, B., Verdun, A., 2022. The European Semester as Goldilocks: macroeconomic policy coordination and the recovery and resilience facility. JCMS J. Common Mark. Stud. 60, 204–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanttinen, P., 2022. Finland to open first LNG terminal. Euractiv.com, 10 June. www.euractiv.com/section/energy-environment/news/finland-to-open-first-lng-terminal/Google Scholar
Vasev, N., 2017. Governing energy while neglecting health: the case of Poland. Health Policy (New. York). 121, 1147–1153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.09.008CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vedby Rasmussen, M., 2004. ‘It sounds like a riddle’: security studies, the war on terror and risk. Millennium 33, 381–395. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298040330020601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verbong, G., Geels, F., 2007. The ongoing energy transition: lessons from a socio-technical, multi-level analysis of the Dutch electricity system (1960–2004). Energy Policy 35, 1025–1037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2006.02.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vihalemm, T., Keller, M., 2016. Consumers, citizens or citizen-consumers? Domestic users in the process of Estonian electricity market liberalization. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 13, 38–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2015.12.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vihma, A., Wigell, M., 2016. Unclear and present danger: Russia’s geoeconomics and the Nord Stream II pipeline. Glob. Aff. 2, 377–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/23340460.2016.1251073CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vilemas, J., 1995. Nuclear energy in Lithuania: present status and hopes for the future. Energy Policy 23, 719–722. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-4215(94)00009-TCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Visegrad Group, 2014. Joint Statement of the 21st Meeting of the Ministerst of Environment of the Visegrad Group Countries, the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania. Bratislava.Google Scholar
Visegrad Group, 2016. Joint Statement of the Heads of Governments of the V4 Countries. Bratislava.Google Scholar
Viviescas, C., Lima, L., Diuana, F. A., Vasquez, E., Ludovique, C., Silva, G. N., Huback, V., Magalar, L., Szklo, A., Lucena, A. F. P., Schaeffer, R., Paredes, J. R., 2019. Contribution of Variable Renewable Energy to increase energy security in Latin America: complementarity and climate change impacts on wind and solar resources. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 113, 109232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.06.039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vivoda, V., 2022. LNG export diversification and demand security: A comparative study of major exporters. Energy Policy 170, 113218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vlček, T., 2016 . Critical assessment of diversification of nuclear fuel for the operating VVER reactors in the EU. Energy Strateg. Rev. 13–14, 77–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2016.08.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vlček, T., Jirušek, M., 2019. Comparison with Russian operations in the sector of natural gas: the case of Gazprom, in: Vlček, T., Jirušek, M. (Eds.), Russian Oil Enterprises in Europe: Investments and Regional Influence. Springer International, Cham, pp. 211–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogler, J., 2017. The challenge of the environment, energy, and climate change, in: Hill, C., Smith, M., Vanhoonacker, S. (Eds.), International Relations and the European Union. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
von der Leyen, U., 2023. Davos 23: Special Address by Ursula von der Leyen, President of the European Commission. World Economic Forum, 17 January. www.weforum.org/agenda/2023/01/davos-23-special-address-by-ursula-von-der-leyen-president-of-the-european-commission/Google Scholar
von Homeyer, I., Oberthür, S., Dupont, C., 2022. Implementing the European Green Deal during the evolving energy crisis. JCMS J. Common Mark. Stud. 60, 125–136. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Lucke, F., 2021. Principled pragmatism in climate policy? The EU and changing practices of climate justice. Polit. Geogr. 86, 102355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2021.102355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, A., 2015. Shale gas: energy innovation in a (non-)knowledge society: a press discourse analysis. Sci. Public Policy 42, 273–286. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scu050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, A., Grobelski, T., Harembski, M., 2016. Is energy policy a public issue? Nuclear power in Poland and implications for energy transitions in Central and East Europe. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 13, 158–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2015.12.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, B., Hauer, C., Schoder, A., Habersack, H., 2015. A review of hydropower in Austria: past, present and future development. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 50, 304–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldholz, R., 2018. Smothered by smog, activists are urging Poland to reconsider coal. Public Radio International, 11 December. https://theworld.org/stories/2018-12-11/smothered-smog-activists-are-urging-poland-reconsider-coalGoogle Scholar
Walsh, M., 2019. Community energy in Hungary and Czechia. www.foeeurope.org/sites/default/files/climate_justice/2019/community_energy_in_hungary_and_czechia_briefing.pdfGoogle Scholar
Wang, B., Wang, Q., Wei, Y.-M., Li, Z.-P., 2018. Role of renewable energy in China’s energy security and climate change mitigation: an index decomposition analysis. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 90, 187–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.03.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, J., Kim, S., 2018. Comparative analysis of public attitudes toward nuclear power energy across 27 European countries by applying the multilevel model. Sustain. 10(5), 1518. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, X., Lo, K., 2021. Just transition: a conceptual review. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 82, 102291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Z., Paavola, J., 2023. Resilience of the EU ETS to contextual disturbance: the case of EU enlargement and its impact on ETS policymaking dynamics. Env. Polit. 32, 69–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2022.2043072CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Washington Post, 2018. State of the Union 2018. www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2018/live-updates/trump-white-house/fact-checking-and-analysis-of-trumps-state-of-the-union-2018-address/about-that-war-on-beautiful-clean-coal/?noredirect=onGoogle Scholar
Watt, R., 2021. The fantasy of carbon offsetting. Env. Polit. 30, 1069–1088. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2021.1877063CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiner, C., 2019. Diversifying away from Russian Gas: the case of Poland. Outlines Glob. Transform. Polit. Econ. Law 12, 138–163. https://doi.org/10.23932/2542-0240-2019-12-2-138-163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiner, C., 2021. Pathways for a low-carbon electricity system in Poland and Hungary, in: Mišík, M., Oravcová, V. (Eds.), From Economic to Energy Transition: Three Decades of Transitions in Central and Eastern Europe. Springer International, Cham, pp. 211–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiner, C., Szép, T., 2022. The Hungarian utility cost reduction programme: an impact assessment. Energy Strateg. Rev. 40, 100817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2022.100817CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wettestad, J., 2014. Rescuing EU emissions trading: mission impossible? Glob. Environ. Polit. 14, 64–81. https://doi.org/10.1162/GLEP_a_00229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, S., 2022. Power plant shutdowns hinder France’s ‘nuclear adventure. Financial Times, 29 May.Google Scholar
White, S., Abboud, L., 2022. Macron restarts France’s ‘nuclear adventure’ with plans for 6 reactors. Financial Times, 10 February.Google Scholar
White House, 2021. Executive Order on Catalyzing Clean Energy Industries and Jobs through Federal Sustainability. www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/2021/12/08/executive-order-on-catalyzing-clean-energy-industries-and-jobs-through-federal-sustainability/Google Scholar
WHO, 2022. Air Pollution. www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ambient-(outdoor)-air-quality-and-healthGoogle Scholar
Wilczek, M., 2020. Construction of Poland’s first nuclear power plant to begin in 2026. Notes from Poland, 16 June. https://notesfrompoland.com/2020/06/16/construction-of-polands-first-nuclear-power-plant-to-begin-in-2026/Google Scholar
Williams, M. J., 2008. (In)security studies, reflexive modernization and the risk society. Coop. Confl. 43, 57–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WNA, 2021a. Nuclear power in Czech Republic. World Nuclear Association. https://world-nuclear.org/information-library/country-profiles/countries-a-f/czech-republic.aspxGoogle Scholar
WNA, 2021b. Nuclear power in Lithuania. World Nuclear Association. www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/country-profiles/countries-g-n/lithuania.aspxGoogle Scholar
WNA, 2022a. Nuclear power in Poland. World Nuclear Association. https://world-nuclear.org/information-library/country-profiles/countries-o-s/poland.aspxGoogle Scholar
WNA, 2022b. Carbon dioxide emissions from electricity. World Nuclear Association. https://world-nuclear.org/information-library/energy-and-the-environment/carbon-dioxide-emissions-from-electricity.aspxGoogle Scholar
Wolska, A., 2022. Poland’s road to nuclear: Will it pay off? Euractiv.com, 29 February. https://eu-sysflex.com/polands-road-to-nuclear-will-it-pay-off/Google Scholar
Woollacott, J., 2020. A bridge too far? The role of natural gas electricity generation in US climate policy. Energy Policy 147, 111867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Bank, 2023. Breaking Down Barriers to Clean Energy Transition. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Woźniakowski, T. P., Maatsch, A., Miklin, E., 2021. Rising to a challenge? Ten years of parliamentary accountability of the European Semester. Polit. Gov. 9. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i3.4690Google Scholar
Wunderlich, J.-U., 2020. Positioning as normative actors: China and the EU in climate change negotiations. JCMS J. Common Mark. Stud. 58, 1107–1123. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wurzel, R. K. W., Liefferink, D., Di Lullo, M., 2019. The European Council, the Council and the member states: changing environmental leadership dynamics in the European Union. Env. Polit. 28, 248–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2019.1549783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WWF, 2021. Coal comfort: Bulgarian recovery plan makes green gains, but stalls on coal exit – ball is in EC’s court. World Wide Fund, 11 November. https://wwfcee.org/news/coal-comfort-bulgarian-recovery-plan-makes-green-gains-but-stalls-on-coal-exit-ball-is-in-ecs-courtGoogle Scholar
Xinhua, 2019. Ecologists protest against coal dependency in Poland. 14 May. www.xinhuanet.com/english/2019-05/14/c_138058256.htmGoogle Scholar
Yafimava, K., 2017. The OPAL Exemption Decision: Past, Present, and Future. Oxford.Google Scholar
Yafimava, K., 2021. The OPAL Exemption Decision: A Comment on the Advocate General’s Opinion on Its Annulment and Its Implications for the Court of Justice Judgement and OPAL Regulatory Treatment. Oxford.Google Scholar
Youngs, R., 2009. Energy Security: Europe’s New Foreign Policy Challenge. Routledge, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zachmann, G., McWilliams, B., Sgaravatti, G., 2021. How Serious Is Europe’s Natural Gas Storage Shortfall? Brussels.Google Scholar
Zachová, A., 2021a. Czech coal mining regions confronted with ‘hidden’ energy poverty. Euractiv.com, 22 February. www.euractiv.com/section/energy-environment/news/czech-coal-mining-regions-confronted-with-hidden-energy-poverty/Google Scholar
Zachová, A., 2021b. Czech health minister backs coal mining phase-out ‘as soon as possible. Euractiv.com, 19 January. www.euractiv.com/section/air-pollution/news/czech-health-minister-backs-coal-mining-phase-out-as-soon-as-possible/Google Scholar
Zakeri, B., Paulavets, K., Barreto-Gomez, L., Echeverri, L. G., Pachauri, S., Boza-Kiss, B., Zimm, C., Rogelj, J., Creutzig, F., Ürge-Vorsatz, D., Victor, D. G., Bazilian, M. D., Fritz, S., Gielen, D., McCollum, D. L., Srivastava, L., Hunt, J. D., Pouya, S., 2022. Pandemic, war, and global energy transitions. Energies 15(17), 6114. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15176114Google Scholar
Zeng, S., Streimikiene, D., Baležentis, T., 2017. Review of and comparative assessment of energy security in Baltic States. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 76, 185–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, H.-B., Dai, H.-C., Lai, H.-X., Wang, W.-T., 2017. U.S. withdrawal from the Paris Agreement: reasons, impacts, and China’s response. Adv. Clim. Chang. Res. 8, 220–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accre.2017.09.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Y., Shi, H.-L., 2014. From burden-sharing to opportunity-sharing: unlocking the climate negotiations. Clim. Policy 14, 63–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2014.857979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, C., Zhang, W., Wang, Y., Liu, Q., Guo, J., Xiong, M., Yuan, J., 2017. The economics of coal power generation in China. Energy Policy 105, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.02.020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhelyazkova, A., Kaya, C., Schrama, R., 2017. Notified and substantive compliance with EU law in enlarged Europe: evidence from four policy areas. J. Eur. Public Policy 24, 216–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2016.1264084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Żuk, P., 2023. Soft power and the media management of energy transition: analysis of the media narrative about the construction of nuclear power plants in Poland. Energy Reports 9, 568–583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.11.192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Żuk, P., Żuk, P., 2022a. National energy security or acceleration of transition? Energy policy after the war in Ukraine. Joule 6, 709–712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2022.03.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Żuk, P., Żuk, P., 2022b. The Turów Brown Coal Mine in the shadow of an international conflict: surveying the actions of the European Union Court of Justice and the populist policies of the Polish government. Extr. Ind. Soc. 10, 101054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2022.101054Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Tomas Maltby, King’s College London, Matúš Mišík, Comenius University Bratislava, Slovakia
  • Book: Energy Transitions in Central and Eastern Europe
  • Online publication: 19 April 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108755672.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Tomas Maltby, King’s College London, Matúš Mišík, Comenius University Bratislava, Slovakia
  • Book: Energy Transitions in Central and Eastern Europe
  • Online publication: 19 April 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108755672.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Tomas Maltby, King’s College London, Matúš Mišík, Comenius University Bratislava, Slovakia
  • Book: Energy Transitions in Central and Eastern Europe
  • Online publication: 19 April 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108755672.011
Available formats
×