African Union, ‘Africa Speaks with Unified Voice as AU Executive Council Adopts African Common Position on Energy Access and Just Energy Transition’, 22 July 2022, https://au.int/en/pressreleases/20220722/africa-speaks-unified-voice-au-executive-council-adopts-african-common.Google Scholar

African Union, ‘African Union Launches World’s Largest Single Electricity Market (AFSEM)’, 4 June 2021, https://au.int/en/pressreleases/20210604/african-union-launches-worlds-largest-single-electricity-market-afsem.Google Scholar

Alschner, Wolfgang, Pauwelyn, Joost and Puig, Sergio, ‘The Data-Driven Future of International Economic Law’, 20 Journal of International Economic Law 217 (2017).Google Scholar

APEC, ‘2021 APEC Ministerial Meeting’, Wellington (New Zealand), 9 November 2021, www.apec.org/meeting-papers/annual-ministerial-meetings/2021/2021-apec-ministerial-meeting.Google Scholar

APEC, ‘Annex C – APEC List of Environmental Goods’, 2012, www.apec.org/Meeting-Papers/Leaders-Declarations/2012/2012_aelm/2012_aelm_annexC.Google Scholar

APEC, ‘APEC Advances Environmental Goods Tariffs Cut’, 11 March 2021, www.apec.org/press/news-releases/2021/0311_mag.Google Scholar

APEC, ‘APEC Ministers Responsible for Trade Meeting Joint Statement 2021’, Wellington (New Zealand), 5 June 2021, www.apec.org/Meeting-Papers/Sectoral-Ministerial-Meetings/Trade/2021_MRT.Google Scholar

APEC Market Access Group, ‘Scoping Study on New and Emerging Environmental Goods’, 2021, www.apec.org/publications/2021/12/scoping-study-on-new-and-emerging-environmental-goods.Google Scholar

Arrowsmith, Sue, ‘The Revised Agreement on Government Procurement: Changes to the Procedural Rules and Other Transparency Provisions’, in Arrowsmith, Sue and Anderson, Robert D. (eds.), The WTO Regime on Government Procurement: Challenge and Reform (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011), pp. 285–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

ASEAN Centre for Energy, ‘ASEAN Plan of Action for Energy Cooperation (APAEC) 2016–2025, Phase II: 2021–2025’, 2020, https://aseanenergy.org/asean-plan-of-action-for-energy-cooperation-apaec-phase-ii-2021-2025/.Google Scholar

Asmelash, Henok Birhanu, ‘Energy Subsidies and WTO Dispute Settlement: Why Only Renewable Energy Subsidies Are Challenged’, 18 Journal of International Economic Law 261 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Asmelash, Henok Birhanu, ‘Phasing Out Fossil Fuel Subsidies in the G20: Progress, Challenges, and Ways Forward’, International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development, 2017.Google Scholar

Asmelash, Henok Birhanu, ‘The Regulation of Environmentally Harmful Fossil Fuel Subsidies: From Obscurity to Prominence in the Multilateral Trading System’, 33 European Journal of International Law 993 (2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Asselt, Harro van and Kulovesi, Kati, ‘Seizing the Opportunity: Tackling Fossil Fuel Subsidies under the UNFCCC’, 17 International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 357 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Asselt, Harro van, Merrill, Laura and Kulovesi, Kati, ‘Fossil Fuel Subsidies and the Global Climate Regime’, in Skovgaard, Jakob and van Asselt, Harro (eds.), The Politics of Fossil Fuel Subsidies and Their Reform (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018), pp. 140–155.Google Scholar

Asselt, Harro van, van der Grijp, Nicolien and Oosterhuis, Frans, ‘Greener Public Purchasing: Opportunities for Climate-Friendly Government Procurement under WTO and EU Rules’, 6 Climate Policy 217 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Azaria, Danae, Treaties on Transit of Energy via Pipelines and Countermeasures (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar

Bacchus, James, ‘The Case for a WTO Climate Waiver’, Centre for International Governance Innovation, Special Report, 2017.Google Scholar

Bacchus, James, ‘Legal Issues with the European Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism’, CATO Briefing Paper No. 125, CATO, 2021.Google Scholar

Bacchus, James, The Willing World: Shaping and Sharing a Sustainable Global Prosperity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018).Google Scholar

Bacchus, James and Manak, Inu, ‘Free Trade in Environmental Goods Will Increase Access to Green Tech’, Free Trade Bulletin No. 80, Cato Institute, 2021.Google Scholar

Bartels, Lorand, ‘The WTO Legality of the Application of the EU’s Emission Trading System to Aviation’, 23 European Journal of International Law 429 (2012).Google Scholar

Bartenhagen, Erik P., ‘The Intersection of Trade and the Environment: An Examination of the Impact of the TBT Agreement on Ecolabelling Programs’, 17 Virginia Environmental Law Journal 51 (1997).Google Scholar

Bast, Elizabeth et al., ‘Empty Promises: G20 Subsidies to Oil, Gas and Coal Production’, Overseas Development Institute and Oil Change International, 2015.Google Scholar

Bazilian, Morgan, Cuming, Victoria and Kenyon, Thomas, ‘Local-Content Rules for Renewables Projects Do Not Always Work’, 32 Energy Strategy Reviews (2020) 100569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bellmann, Christophe and Bulatnikova, Alena, ‘Incorporating Environmental Provisions in Regional Trade Agreements in Chapters and Articles Dealing with Trade in Services’, OECD Trade and Environment Working Paper No. 2022/01, OECD, 2022.Google Scholar

Bellmann, Christophe and van der Ven, Colette, ‘Greening Regional Trade Agreements on Non-Tariff Measures through Technical Barriers to Trade and Regulatory Co-operation’, OECD Trade and Environment Working Paper No. 2020/4, 2020.Google Scholar

Benton, Tim G., Froggatt, Antony and Wellesley, Laura, ‘The Ukraine War and Threats to Food and Energy Security: Cascading Risks from Rising Prices and Supply Disruptions’, Research Paper, Royal Institute of International Affairs, 2022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bigdeli, Sadeq Z., ‘Resurrecting the Dead – The Expired Non-actionable Subsidies and the Lingering Question of “Green Space”’, 8(2) Manchester Journal of International Economic Law 2 (2011).Google Scholar

Bohmer, Lisa, ‘Breaking: Germany and Vattenfall Settle Long-Running Arbitration Dispute Arising from Nuclear Phase-Out’, Investment Arbitration Reporter, 5 March 2021, www.iareporter.com.Google Scholar

Bohmer, Lisa, ‘Revealed: Reasons Why Van Houtte, Beechey, and Landau Saw No Legitimate Expectation to Stabilization of Czech Solar Feed-In-Tariffs; Newly-Seen Award also Deemed Intra-EU Objection Untimely’, Investment Arbitration Reporter, 23 June 2019, www.iareporter.com.Google Scholar

Bohmer, Lisa, ‘[Updated] Canadian Province of Alberta Files NAFTA/USMCA Notice of Intent in Relation to Keystone XL Pipeline Dispute with the USA’, Investment Arbitration Reporter, 9 February 2022, www.iareporter.com.Google Scholar

Bohmer, Lisa, ‘[Updated] Vattenfall Asks for Discontinuance of ICSID Arbitration against Germany, after Settlement Enters Into Force’, Investment Arbitration Reporter, 2 November 2021, www.iareporter.com.Google Scholar

Böhringer, Christoph, Carbone, Jared C. and Rutherford, Thomas F., ‘Embodied Carbon Tariffs’, 120 Scandinavian Journal of Economics 183 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boute, Anatole, ‘The Potential Contribution of International Investment Protection Law to Combat Climate Change’, 27 Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law 333 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bronckers, Marco and Gruni, Giovanni, ‘Retooling the Sustainability Standards in EU Free Trade Agreements’, 24 Journal of International Economic Law 25 (2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cameron, Peter D., International Energy Investment Law: The Pursuit of Stability (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Canada Border Services Agency, Statement of Reasons Concerning the Final Determinations with Respect to the Dumping and the Subsidizing of Certain Photovoltaic Modules and Laminates Originating in or Exported from the People’s Republic of China, 18 June 2015.Google Scholar

Capobianco, Antonio and Christiansen, Hans, ‘Competitive Neutrality and State-Owned Enterprises: Challenges and Policy Options’, OECD Corporate Governance Working Papers No. 1, 2011.Google Scholar

Carbon Tracker Initiative, ‘Carbon Supply Cost Curves: Evaluating Financial Risk to Coal Capital Expenditures’, 2014, www.carbontracker.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/CTI-Coal-report-Sept-2014-WEB1.pdf.Google Scholar

Casier, Liesbeth et al., ‘Shining a Light on Fossil Fuel Subsidies at the WTO: How NGOs Can Contribute to WTO Notification and Surveillance’, 13 World Trade Review 603 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cendra, Javier de, ‘Can Emissions Trading Schemes Be Coupled with Border Tax Adjustments? An Analysis vis-à-vis WTO Law’, 15 RECIEL 131 (2006).Google Scholar

Centre for Global Development, ‘Developed Countries Are Responsible for 79 Percent of Historical Carbon Emissions’, 2015, www.cgdev.org/media/who-caused-climate-change-historically#:~:text=Developed%20Countries%20Are%20Responsible%20for,Global%20Development%20%7C%20Ideas%20to%20Action.Google Scholar

Centre for Global Development, ‘Developing Countries Are Responsible for 63 Percent of Current Carbon Emissions’, 2015, www.cgdev.org/media/developing-countries-are-responsible-63-percent-current-carbon-emissions.Google Scholar

Centre for International Environmental Law, ‘Plastic & Climate: The Hidden Costs of a Plastic Planet’, 2019.Google Scholar

Chang, Seung Wha, ‘GATTing a Green Trade Barrier: Eco-Labelling and the WTO Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade’, 31 Journal of World Trade 137 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Charlotin, Damien, ‘Natland v. Czech Republic (Part 2 of 2): On the Merits, Tribunal Finds Stabilisation Commitment in Czech Legislation and Breach of That Commitment with Introduction of Solar Levy’, Investment Arbitration Reporter, 26 July 2018, www.iareporter.com.Google Scholar

Charnovitz, Steve, ‘The Law of Environmental “PPMs” in the WTO: Debunking the Myth of Illegality’, 27 Yale Journal of International Law 59 (2002).Google Scholar

Chatzivasileiadis, Spyros, Ernst, Damien and Andersson, Göran, ‘The Global Grid’, 57 Renewable Energy 372 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chazan, Guy, ‘Germany Extends Life of Nuclear Power Plants until Next April’, Financial Times, 18 October 2022, www.ft.com/content/3f48c18f-0348-46b0-a082-3bf07e14e589.Google Scholar

Chelminski, Kathryn, ‘Fossil Fuel Subsidy Reform in Indonesia: The Struggle for Successful Reform’, in Skovgaard, Jakob and van Asselt, Harro (eds.), The Politics of Fossil Fuel Subsidies and Their Reform (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018), pp. 193–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chi, Manjiao, ‘Sustainable Development Provisions in Investment Treaties’, UN Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific, 2018.Google Scholar

China, ‘Outline of the People’s Republic of China 14th Five-Year Plan for National Economic and Social Development and Long-Range Objectives for 2035’, 12 March 2021 (English translation at Centre for Security and Emerging Technology, https://cset.georgetown.edu/publication/china-14th-five-year-plan/).Google Scholar

Cleeland, Belinda, ‘ISO: International Standards for Services’, UNCTAD Multi-year Expert Meeting on Trade, Services and Development, 18–20 July 2017, https://unctad.org/system/files/non-official-document/c1mem5_2017_105_S1_Cleeland_2.pdf.Google Scholar

Coady, David et al., ‘How Large Are Global Energy Subsidies?’, IMF Working Paper No. WP/15/105, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coady, David, Flamini, Valentina and Sears, Louis, ‘The Unequal Benefits of Fuel Subsidies Revisited: Evidence for Developing Countries’, IMF Working Paper No. WP/15/250, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen, Wesley M. and Levinthal, Daniel A., ‘Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation’, 35 Administrative Science Quarterly 128 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Commission Decision (EU) 2015/1470 of 30 March 2015 on State aid SA.38517 (2014/C) (ex 2014/NN) Implemented by Romania – Arbitral Award Micula v. Romania of 11 December 2013, OJ L 232, 4 September 2015.Google Scholar

Commission Decision of 30 June 2004 on the Aid Scheme Implemented by Sweden for an Exemption from the Tax on Energy from 1 January 2002 to 30 June 2004 (2005/468/EC), OJ L 165, 25 June 2005.Google Scholar

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No. 471/2014 of 13 May 2014 Imposing Definitive Countervailing Duties on Imports of Solar Glass Originating in the People’s Republic of China, OJ L 142, 14 May 2014.Google Scholar

Condon, Bradly J. and Sinha, Tapen, The Role of Climate Change in Global Economic Governance (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Conrad, Christiane R., Processes and Production Methods (PPMs) in WTO Law: Interfacing Trade and Social Goals (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coppens, Dominic, WTO Disciplines on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures: Balancing Policy Space and Legal Constraints (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Corvaglia, Maria Anna, ‘Public Procurement and Private Standards: Ensuring Sustainability under the WTO Agreement on Government Procurement’, 19 Journal of International Economic Law 607 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cosbey, Aaron and Mavroidis, Petros C., ‘A Turquoise Mess: Green Subsidies, Blue Industrial Policy and Renewable Energy: The Case for Redrafting the Subsidies Agreement of the WTO’, 17 Journal of International Economic Law 11 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cosbey, Aaron, Bernstein, Michael and Stiebert, Seton, ‘Enabling Climate Ambition: Border Carbon Adjustment in Canada and Abroad’, International Institute for Sustainable Development and Clean Prosperity, 2021.Google Scholar

Cottier, Thomas and Espa, Ilaria (eds.), International Trade in Sustainable Electricity: Regulatory Challenges in International Economic Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No. 1239/2013 of 2 December 2013 Imposing a Definitive Countervailing Duty on Imports of Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Modules and Key Components (i.e. Cells) Originating in or Consigned from the People’s Republic of China, OJ L 325, 5 December 2013.Google Scholar

Council of European Energy Regulators, ‘Key Support Elements of RES in Europe: Moving towards Market Integration’, C15-SDE-49-03, 2016.Google Scholar

Cox, Sadie and Esterly, Sean, ‘Renewable Electricity Standards: Good Practices and Design Considerations’, Technical Report No. NREL/TP-6A20-65507, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Luca, Anna and Baltag, Crina, ‘Counterclaims in Investment Arbitration: Reflections on UNCITRAL WG III Reform’, Kluwer Arbitration Blog, 5 November 2021, http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2021/11/05/counterclaims-in-investment-arbitration-reflections-on-uncitral-wg-iii-reform/.Google Scholar

Deane, Felicity, Emissions Trading and WTO Law: A Global Analysis (Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dihel, Nora Carina, ‘Understanding Trade in Environmental Services: Key Issues and Prospects’, in Cattaneo, Olivier et al. (eds.), International Trade in Services: New Trends and Opportunities for Developing Countries (Washington, DC: World Bank, 2010), pp. 319–348.Google Scholar

DiMascio, Nicholas and Pauwelyn, Joost, ‘Nondiscrimination in Trade and Investment Treaties: Worlds Apart or Two Sides of the Same Coin?’, 102 American Journal of International Law 48 (2008).Google Scholar

Dolzer, Rudolf and Schreuer, Christoph, Principles of International Investment Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Du, Ming, ‘WTO Regulation of Transnational Private Authority in Global Governance’, 67 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 867 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dufo-López, Rodolfo and Bernal-Agustín, José L., ‘A Comparative Assessment of Net Metering and Net Billing Policies. Study Cases for Spain’, 84 Energy 684 (2015).Google Scholar

Durán, Gracia Marín, ‘Sheltering Government Support to “Green” Electricity: The European Union and the World Trade Organization’, 67 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 129 (2018).Google Scholar

Energy Charter Secretariat, ‘Energy Efficiency Group’, 14 December 2016, www.energycharter.org/who-we-are/subsidiary-bodies/energy-efficiency-group/.Google Scholar

Energy Charter Secretariat, ‘Finalisation of the Negotiations on the Modernisation of the Energy Charter Treaty’, Public Communication approved by the Energy Charter Conference on 24 June 2022, www.energycharter.org/fileadmin/DocumentsMedia/CCDECS/2022/CCDEC202210.pdf.Google Scholar

Energy Charter Secretariat, ‘Statistics of ECT Cases (as of 01/06/2022)’, www.energychartertreaty.org/fileadmin/user_upload/All_statistics_-_1_June_2022.pdf.Google Scholar

Energypedia, ‘Feed-in Premiums (FIP)’, https://energypedia.info/wiki/Feed-in_Premiums_(FIP).Google Scholar

Energypedia, ‘Feed-in Tariffs (FIT)’, https://energypedia.info/wiki/Feed-in_Tariffs_(FIT).Google Scholar

Epps, Tracey and Green, Andrew, Reconciling Trade and Climate: How the WTO Can Help Address Climate Change (Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Espa, Ilaria and Durán, Gracia Marín, ‘Renewable Energy Subsidies and WTO Law: Time to Rethink the Case for Reform Beyond Canada – Renewable Energy / Fit Program’, 21 Journal of International Economic Law 621 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Espa, Ilaria and Rolland, Sonia E., ‘Subsidies, Clean Energy, and Climate Change’, International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development and World Economic Forum, 2015.Google Scholar

EU, Commission Decision of 20 December 2012 Terminating the Anti-subsidy Proceeding Concerning Imports of Bioethanol Originating in the United States of America and Terminating the Registration of Such Imports Imposed by Regulation (EU) No. 771/2012, OJ L 352, 21 December 2012.Google Scholar

EU’s Concept Paper on WTO Modernization, 18 September 2018, http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2018/september/tradoc_157331.pdf.Google Scholar

Euractive, ‘LEAK: Exit from Energy Charter Treaty “unavoidable”, EU Commission Says’, 9 February 2023, www.euractiv.com/section/energy/news/exit-from-energy-charter-treaty-unavoidable-eu-commission-says/.Google Scholar

European Commission, ‘Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: Questions and Answers’, 14 July 2021, https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/qanda_21_3661.Google Scholar

European Commission, ‘Commission Notice on the Recovery of Unlawful and Incompatible State Aid (2019/C 247/01)’, OJ C 247/1, 23 July 2019.Google Scholar

European Commission, ‘Commission Services Position Paper on the Trade Sustainability Impact Assessment for the FTA between the EU and the Republic of India’, March 2010, https://policy.trade.ec.europa.eu/analysis-and-assessment/sustainability-impact-assessments_en.Google Scholar

European Commission, ‘Electricity Market Design’, https://energy.ec.europa.eu/topics/markets-and-consumers/market-legislation/electricity-market-design_en.Google Scholar

European Commission, ‘European Commission Services’ Position Paper on the Sustainability Impact Assessment in Support of Negotiations on a Trade Agreement between the European Union and Indonesia’, 26 June 2020, https://policy.trade.ec.europa.eu/analysis-and-assessment/sustainability-impact-assessments_en.Google Scholar

European Commission, ‘European Commission Services’ Position Paper on the Trade Sustainability Impact Assessment in Support of Negotiations of a Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and Morocco’, April 2015, https://policy.trade.ec.europa.eu/analysis-and-assessment/sustainability-impact-assessments_en.Google Scholar

European Commission, ‘European Commission Services’ Position Paper on the Trade Sustainability Impact Assessment in Support of Negotiations of a Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area between the European Union and Jordan’, December 2016, https://policy.trade.ec.europa.eu/analysis-and-assessment/sustainability-impact-assessments_en.Google Scholar

European Commission, ‘European Green Deal: Agreement Reached on the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM)’, 13 December 2022, https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_22_7719.Google Scholar

European Commission, ‘The European Green Deal’, Communication to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, COM(2019) 640 final, 11 December 2019.Google Scholar

European Commission, ‘Impact Assessment Report Accompanying the Document: Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council Establishing a Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism’, Commission Staff Working Document, SWD(2021) 643 final, 14 July 2021.Google Scholar

European Commission, ‘Non-paper from the European Commission: Next Steps as Regards the EU, Euratom and Member States’ Membership in the Energy Charter Treaty’, 2023, www.euractiv.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2023/02/Non-paper_ECT_nextsteps.pdf.Google Scholar

European Commission, ‘Service Standards’, https://ec.europa.eu/growth/single-market/services/service-standards_en.Google Scholar

European Commission, ‘State Aid: Commission Adopts Temporary Crisis and Transition Framework to Further Support Transition towards Net-Zero Economy’, 9 March 2023, https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_23_1563.Google Scholar

European Commission, ‘State Aid: Commission Approves German Aid Scheme for Renewable Energy (EEG 2012); Orders Partial Recovery’, 25 November 2014, https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_14_2122.Google Scholar

European Commission, ‘State Aid: Commission Opens In-Depth Investigation into Arbitration Award in Favour of Antin to Be Paid by Spain’, 19 July 2021, https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_21_3783.Google Scholar

European Commission, ‘State Aid: Commission Requires Italy to Recover around €18 Million Incompatible State Aid from Metal Producers Portovesme, ILA and Eurallumina’, 23 February 2011, https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_11_215.Google Scholar

European Commission, ‘Temporary Crisis and Transition Framework’ (applicable as of 9 March 2023), https://competition-policy.ec.europa.eu/state-aid/ukraine_en.Google Scholar

European Commission, ‘Trade and Climate: EU and Partner Countries Launch the “Coalition of Trade Ministers on Climate”’, 19 January 2023, https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_23_248.Google Scholar

European Commission, ‘Voluntary Schemes’, https://energy.ec.europa.eu/topics/renewable-energy/bioenergy/voluntary-schemes_en.Google Scholar

European Committee for Standardization, ‘Mandate M/517 for the Programming and Development of Horizontal Service Standards: Phase I Final Report’, 2015, https://ftp.cencenelec.eu/CEN/WhatWeDo/Fields/Services/FinalReportPhase1-M517.pdf.Google Scholar

Falcão, Tatiana, ‘Toward Carbon Tax Internationalism: The EU Border Carbon Adjustment Proposal’, 98 Tax Notes International 1047 (2020).Google Scholar

Farah, Paolo D. and Cima, Elena, ‘Energy Trade and the WTO: Implications for Renewable Energy and the OPEC Cartel’, 16 Journal of International Economic Law 707 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feichtner, Isabel, The Law and Politics of WTO Waivers: Stability and Flexibility in Public International Law (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fleury, Julien Sylvestre and Marcoux, Jean-Michel, ‘The US Shaping of State-Owned Enterprise Disciplines in the Trans-Pacific Partnership’, 19 Journal of International Economic Law 445 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Florou, Aikaterini, ‘The UK Supreme Court Judgment in Micula v. Romania: A Landmark Judgment for the Relationship between EU Law and International Investment Law?’, 36 ICSID Review 295 (2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fowlie, Meredith and Reguant, Mar, ‘Challenges in the Measurement of Leakage Risk’, 108 AEA Papers and Proceedings 124 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fung, K. C. and Korinek, Jane, ‘Economics of Export Restrictions as Applied to Industrial Raw Materials’, OECD Trade Policy Paper No. 155, 2013.Google Scholar

G7, ‘Terms of Reference for the Climate Club’, 12 December 2022, www.g7germany.de/resource/blob/974430/2153140/a04dde2adecf0ddd38cb9829a99c322d/2022-12-12-g7-erklaerung-data.pdf?download=1.Google Scholar

García-Castrillón, Carmen Otero, ‘Spain and Investment Arbitration: The Renewable Energy Explosion’, Centre for International Governance Innovation, Investor-State Arbitration Series, Paper No. 17, 2016.Google Scholar

Gari, Gabriel, ‘Is the WTO’s Approach to International Standards on Services Outdated?’, 19 Journal of International Economic Law 589 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gáspár-Szilágyi, Szilárd and Usynin, Maxim, ‘The Uneasy Relationship between Intra-EU Investment Tribunals and the Court of Justice’s Achmea Judgment’, 4 European Investment Law and Arbitration Review 29 (2019).Google Scholar

GATT, ‘Report by the Working Party on Border Tax Adjustments’, L/3464, 20 November 1970.Google Scholar

GATT, Council – Minutes of Meeting – Held in the Centre William Rappard on 22 May 1986, GATT Doc., C/M/198, 12 June 1986.Google Scholar

GATT, Uruguay Round – Group of Negotiations on Services – Services Sectoral Classification List – Note by the Secretariat, MTN.GNS/W/120, 10 July 1991.Google Scholar

Gerasimchuk, Ivetta et al., ‘A Guidebook to Reviews of Fossil Fuel Subsidies: From Self-Reports to Peer Learning’, International Institute for Sustainable Development, 2017.Google Scholar

Global Ecolabelling Network, ‘All Ecolabels on Energy’, www.ecolabelindex.com/ecolabels/?st=category,energy.Google Scholar

Gordon, Kathryn and Pohl, Joachim, ‘Environmental Concerns in International Investment Agreements: A Survey’, OECD Working Papers on International Investment No. 2011/01, 2011.Google Scholar

Government of Canada, ‘Consultation on Border Carbon Adjustments’, 1 February 2022, www.canada.ca/en/department-finance/programs/consultations/2021/border-carbon-adjustments.html.Google Scholar

Government of Canada, ‘Lone Pine Resources Inc. v. Government of Canada’, 28 April 2021, www.international.gc.ca/trade-agreements-accords-commerciaux/topics-domaines/disp-diff/lone.aspx?lang=eng.Google Scholar

Gruère, Guillaume, ‘A Characterization of Environmental Labelling and Information Schemes’, OECD Environment Working Paper No. 62, ENV/WKP(2013)9, 2013.Google Scholar

Hakura, Dalia and Jaumotte, Florence, ‘The Role of Inter- and Intraindustry Trade in Technology Diffusion’, IMF Working Paper No. WP/99/58 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harrison, James, ‘Environmental Counterclaims in Investor–State Arbitration’, 17 The Journal of World Investment & Trade 479 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hegde, Vineet and Wouters, Jan, ‘Special and Differential Treatment under the World Trade Organization: A Legal Typology’, 24 Journal of International Economic Law 551 (2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heine, Dirk, Faure, Michael G. and Dominioni, Goran, ‘The Polluter-Pays Principle in Climate Change Law: An Economic Appraisal’, 10 Climate Law 94 (2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Henckels, Caroline, ‘A Duty to Consult Foreign Investors When Changing the Regulatory Framework? Implications for Non-Communicable Disease Prevention and Beyond’, 21 Journal of World Investment & Trade 698 (2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hepburn, Jarrod, ‘ANALYSIS: In New Award, Italian Renewables Changes Appear Less Dramatic Than Those in Recent Spain Case, Thus Leading to Failure of Blusun’s FET Claim; Arbitrators Disagree on Expropriation Assessment’, Investment Arbitration Reporter, 7 June 2017, www.iareporter.com.Google Scholar

Hobér, Kaj, The Energy Charter Treaty: A Commentary (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020).Google Scholar

Hoekman, Bernard M., Maskus, Keith E. and Saggi, Kamal, ‘Transfer of Technology to Developing Countries: Unilateral and Multilateral Policy Options’, 33 World Development 1587 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hogan, Megan, ‘Local Content Requirements Threaten Renewable Energy Uptake: Featuring a List of Local Content Requirements in Wind and Solar Industries’, Peterson Institute for International Economics, 6 December 2021, www.piie.com/blogs/trade-and-investment-policy-watch/local-content-requirements-threaten-renewable-energy-uptake.Google Scholar

Holzer, Kateryna, ‘Addressing Tensions and Avoiding Disputes: Specific Trade Concerns in the TBT Committee’, WTO Staff Working Paper No. ERSD-2018–11, 31 October 2018.Google Scholar

Holzer, Kateryna, Carbon-Related Border Adjustment and WTO Law (Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holzer, Kateryna, ‘Proposals on Carbon-Related Border Adjustments: Prospects for WTO Compliance’, 1 Carbon & Climate Law Review 51 (2010).Google Scholar

Horlick, Gary and Clarke, Peggy A., ‘Rethinking Subsidy Disciplines for the Future: Policy Options for Reform’, 20 Journal of International Economic Law 673 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Horn, Henrik and Mavroidis, Petros C., ‘To B(TA) or Not to B(TA)? On the Legality and Desirability of Border Tax Adjustments from a Trade Perspective’, 34 The World Economy 1911 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Horn, Henrik and Sapir, André, ‘Can Border Carbon Taxes Fit into the Global Trade Regime?’, Policy Brief No. 2013/06, Bruegel, 2013.Google Scholar

Horn, Henrik, Mavroidis, Petros C. and Wijkström, Erik N., ‘In the Shadow of the DSU: Addressing Specific Trade Concerns in the WTO SPS and TBT Committees’, 47 Journal of World Trade 729 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Howse, Robert, ‘Climate Mitigation Subsidies and the WTO Legal Framework: A Policy Analysis’, International Institute for Sustainable Development, 2010.Google Scholar

Howse, Robert and Eliason, Antonia L., ‘Domestic and International Strategies to Address Climate Change: An Overview of the WTO Legal Issues’, in Cottier, Thomas, Nartova, Olga and Bigdeli, Sadeq Z. (eds.), International Trade Regulation and the Mitigation of Climate Change (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009), pp. 48–93.Google Scholar

Howse, Robert and Regan, Donald, ‘The Product/Process Distinction – An Illusory Basis for Disciplining “Unilateralism” in Trade Policy’, 11 European Journal of International Law 249 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hsieh, Pasha L., ‘Reassessing APEC’s Role as a Trans-Regional Economic Architecture: Legal and Policy Dimensions’, 16 Journal of International Economic Law 119 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hufbauer, Gary Clyde, Meléndez-Ortiz, Ricardo and Samans, Richard (eds.), The Law and Economics of a Sustainable Energy Trade Agreement (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hufbauer, Gary Clyde et al., Local Content Requirements: A Global Problem (Washington, DC: Peterson Institute for International Economics, 2013).Google Scholar

Hufbauer, Gary Clyde, Charnovitz, Steve and Kim, Jisun, Global Warming and the World Trading System (Washington, DC: Peterson Institute for International Economics, 2009).Google Scholar

Hydropower Sustainability Council, ‘Hydropower Sustainability Standard’, www.hydrosustainability.org/standard-overview.Google Scholar

IAEA, ‘IAEA Nuclear Safety and Security Glossary’, 2022 (Interim) Edition, 2022.Google Scholar

IAEA, ‘Near Term and Promising Long Term Options for the Deployment of Thorium Based Nuclear Energy’, Final Report of a Coordinated Research Project No. IAEA-TECDOC-2009, 2022.Google Scholar

IAEA, ‘Nuclear Safety Conventions’, www.iaea.org/topics/nuclear-safety-conventions.Google Scholar

IAEA, ‘Thorium’s Long-Term Potential in Nuclear Energy: New IAEA Analysis’, 13 March 2023, www.iaea.org/newscenter/news/thoriums-long-term-potential-in-nuclear-energy-new-iaea-analysis.Google Scholar

IEA, ‘Carrots and Sticks: Taxing and Subsidising Energy’, Note on Energy Subsidies and Taxes, 17 January 2006, www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/oil_subsidies.pdf.Google Scholar

IAEA, ‘Energy Security: Ensuring the Uninterrupted Availability of Energy Sources at an Affordable Price’, www.iea.org/areas-of-work/ensuring-energy-security.Google Scholar

IAEA, ‘Energy Subsidies: Tracking the Impact of Fossil-Fuel Subsidies’, www.iea.org/topics/energy-subsidies.Google Scholar

IAEA, ‘Energy Technology Perspectives 2020’, 2020.Google Scholar

IAEA, ‘ETP Clean Energy Technology Guide’, 21 September 2022, www.iea.org/articles/etp-clean-energy-technology-guide.Google Scholar

IAEA, ‘Legal and Regulatory Frameworks for CCUS: An IEA CCUS Handbook’, 2022.Google Scholar

IAEA, ‘Low-Carbon RD&D’, www.iea.org/reports/energy-technology-rdd-budgets-overview/low-carbon-rdd#abstract.Google Scholar

IAEA, ‘Technology Roadmap: Smart Grids’, 2011, www.iea.org/reports/technology-roadmap-smart-grids.Google Scholar

IAEA, ‘World Energy Investment 2020’, 2020, www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-investment-2020.Google Scholar

IEA–RETD, ‘Driving Renewable Energy for Transport: Next Generation Policy Instruments for Renewable Transport (Res-T-Next)’, 2015.Google Scholar

IMF, OECD, World Bank and WTO, ‘Subsidies, Trade, and International Cooperation’, 2022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, ‘The Evidence Is Clear: The Time for Action Is Now. We Can Halve Emissions by 2030’, 4 April 2022, www.ipcc.ch/2022/04/04/ipcc-ar6-wgiii-pressrelease/.Google Scholar

International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation, ‘ILAC MRA and Signatories’, https://ilac.org/ilac-mra-and-signatories/.Google Scholar

IRENA, ‘Global Energy Transformation: A Roadmap to 2050’, 2018.Google Scholar

IRENA, ‘International Standardisation in the Field of Renewable Energy’, 2013.Google Scholar

IRENA, ‘Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2018’, 2019.Google Scholar

IRENA, IEA and REN21, ‘Renewable Energy Policies in a Time of Transition’, 2018.Google Scholar

ISDS Platform, ‘Vattenfall vs. Germany I: Coal-fired Electric Plant’, April 2021, www.isds.bilaterals.org/vattenfall-vs-germany-i-coal-fired.Google Scholar

ISEAL Alliance, ‘ISEAL Codes of Good Practice’, www.isealalliance.org/defining-credible-practice/iseal-codes-good-practice.Google Scholar

ISEAL Alliance, ‘ISEAL Community Members’, www.isealalliance.org/iseal-community-members.Google Scholar

Ishikawa, Tomoko, ‘The Role of the Precautionary and Polluter Pays Principles in Assessing Compensation’, RIETI Discussion Paper Series No. 15-E-107, 2015.Google Scholar

Ismer, R. and Neuhoff, K., ‘Border Tax Adjustments: A Feasible Way to Address Nonparticipation in Emission Trading’, CMI Working Paper No. 36, 2004.Google Scholar

ISO, ‘A Committee to Support Developing Countries: DEVCO’, www.iso.org/devco.html.Google Scholar

ISO, ‘Environmental Labels and Declarations: How ISO Standards Help’, 2012.Google Scholar

ISO, ‘Environmental Labels’, 2019.Google Scholar

ISO, ‘ISO and Energy’, 2018, www.iso.org/publication/PUB100320.html.Google Scholar

ISO, ‘ISO Strategy for Service Standardization’, 2016, www.iso.org/files/live/sites/isoorg/files/store/en/PUB100393.pdf.Google Scholar

Jackson, John H., World Trade and the Law of GATT (Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill Company, 1969).Google Scholar

Jain, Abhishek, Agrawal, Shalu and Ganesan, Karthik, ‘Lessons from the World’s Largest Subsidy Benefit Transfer Scheme: The Case of Liquefied Petroleum Gas Subsidy Reform in India’, in Skovgaard, Jakob and van Asselt, Harro (eds.), The Politics of Fossil Fuel Subsidies and Their Reform (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018), pp. 212–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johns, Bennett, ‘Canadian Anti-dumping and Countervailing Duty Measures’, 2019, www.bennettjones.com/Publications-Section/Guides/Canadian-AntiDumping-and-Countervailing-Duty-Measures.Google Scholar

Karapinar, Baris, ‘Export Restrictions and the WTO Law: How to Reform the “Regulatory Deficiency”’, 45 Journal of World Trade 1139 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Karapinar, Baris and Holzer, Kateryna, ‘Legal Implications of the Use of Export Taxes in Addressing Carbon Leakage: Competing Border Adjustment Measures’, 10 New Zealand Journal of Public and International Law 15 (2012).Google Scholar

Karttunen, Marianna B., Transparency in the WTO SPS and TBT Agreements: The Real Jewel in the WTO’s Crown (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kauffmann, Céline and Saffirio, Camila, ‘Good Regulatory Practices and Co-operation in Trade Agreements: A Historical Perspective and Stocktaking’, OECD Regulatory Policy Working Paper No. 14, 2021.Google Scholar

Kaufmann, Christine and Weber, Rolf H., ‘Carbon-Related Border Tax Adjustment: Mitigating Climate Change or Restricting International Trade?’, 10 World Trade Review 497 (2011).Google Scholar

Keene, Amelia, ‘The Incorporation and Interpretation of WTO-Style Environmental Exceptions in International Investment Agreements’, 18 Journal of World Investment & Trade 62 (2017).Google Scholar

Kennedy, Matthew, ‘The Adverse Effects of Technological Innovation under WTO Subsidy Rules’, 19 World Trade Review 511 (2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kennedy, Matthew, WTO Dispute Settlement and the TRIPS Agreement: Applying Intellectual Property Standards in a Trade Law Framework (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Khachvani, David, ‘Non-compensable Regulation versus Regulatory Expropriation: Are Climate Change Regulations Compensable?’, 35 ICSID Review 154 (2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kigali Communique, ‘Ensuring a Just and Equitable Energy Transition in Africa: Seven Transformative Actions for SDG 7’, 19 May 2022, www.mininfra.gov.rw/index.php?eID=dumpFile&t=f&f=44024&token=c9d8a3e4e9ad4d22aa3c3b883055c9426760c584.Google Scholar

Kim, Jeonghoi, ‘Recent Trends in Export Restrictions on Raw Materials’, in OECD, The Economic Impact of Export Restrictions on Raw Materials (OECD Trade Policy Studies, 2010), pp. 13–57.Google Scholar

Kläger, Roland, ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment’ in International Investment Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kojima, Masami and Koplow, Doug, ‘Fossil Fuel Subsidies: Approaches and Valuation’, Policy Research Working Paper No. WPS7220, World Bank, 2015.Google Scholar

Kowalski, Przemyslaw, Rabaioli, Daniel and Vallejo, Sebastian, ‘International Technology Transfer Measures in an Interconnected World: Lessons and Policy Implications’, OECD Trade Policy Paper No. 206, 2017.Google Scholar

Kuntze, Jan-Christoph and Moerenhout, Tom, ‘Local Content Requirements and the Renewable Energy Industry – A Good Match?’, International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kuriyama, Carlos, ‘The APEC List of Environmental Goods’, APEC Policy Support Unit, Policy Brief No. 5, 2012, www.apec.org/publications/2012/11/the-apec-list-of-environmental-goods.Google Scholar

Kuriyama, Carlos, ‘A Review of the APEC List of Environmental Goods’, APEC Policy Support Unit, Policy Brief No. 41, 2021, www.apec.org/publications/2021/10/a-review-of-the-apec-list-of-environmental-goods.Google Scholar

Kurtz, Jürgen, The WTO and International Investment Law: Converging Systems (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lampe, Martin von, Deconinck, Koen and Bastien, Véronique, ‘Trade-Related International Regulatory Co-operation: A Theoretical Framework’, OECD Trade Policy Paper No. 195, 2016.Google Scholar

Lamy, Pascal, Pons, Geneviève and Leturcq, Pierre, ‘Greening EU Trade 3: A European Border Carbon Adjustment Proposal’, Policy Paper, Europe Jacques Delors, 2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lawder, David, ‘U.S. Floats New Steel, Aluminum Tariffs Based on Carbon Emissions’, Reuters, 8 December 2022, www.reuters.com/business/sustainable-business/us-floats-new-steel-aluminum-tariffs-based-carbon-emissions-2022-12-08/.Google Scholar

Lee, Yong-Shik, ‘Regulatory Autonomy under the WTO Agreement on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures: Implications of Korea–Import Bans, and Testing and Certification Requirements for Radionuclides’, 20 World Trade Review 321 (2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Legum, Barton and Petculescu, Ioana, ‘GATT Article XX and International Investment Law’, in Echandi, Roberto and Sauvé, Pierre (eds.), Prospects in International Investment Law and Policy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013), pp. 340–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Less, Cristina Tébar and McMillan, Steven, ‘Achieving the Successful Transfer of Environmentally Sound Technologies: Trade-Related Aspects’, OECD Trade and Environment Working Paper No. 2005-2, COM/ENV/TD(2004)33/FINAL, 2005.Google Scholar

Levashova, Yulia, ‘The Accountability and Corporate Social Responsibility of Multinational Corporations for Transgressions in Host States through International Investment Law’, 14 Ultrecht Law Review 40 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lévesque, Céline, ‘The Inclusion of GATT Article XX Exceptions in IIAs: A Potentially Risky Policy’, in Echandi, Roberto and Sauvé, Pierre (eds.), Prospects in International Investment Law and Policy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013), pp. 363–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lone Pine Resources Inc. v. Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/15/2, Notice of Arbitration (6 September 2013).Google Scholar

López-Rodríguez, Ana Mercedes, ‘The Sun behind the Clouds? Enforcement of Renewable Energy Awards in the EU’, 8 Transnational Environmental Law 279 (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Luca, Anna De, ‘Indirect Expropriations and Regulatory Takings: What Role for the “Legitimate Expectations” of Foreign Investors?’, in Sacerdoti, Giorgio (ed.), General Interests of Host States in International Investment Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014), pp. 58–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marceau, Gabrielle and Trachtman, Joel P., ‘The Technical Barriers to Trade Agreement, the Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures Agreement, and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade: A Map of the World Trade Organization Law of Domestic Regulation of Goods’, 36 Journal of World Trade 811 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marcu, Andrei et al., ‘Carbon Leakage: An Overview’, Centre for European Policy Studies, CEPS Special Report No. 79 (2013).Google Scholar

Marhold, Anna-Alexandra, Energy in International Trade Law: Concepts, Regulations and Changing Markets (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marhold, Anna-Alexandra, ‘Fossil Fuel Subsidy Reform in the WTO: Options for Constraining Dual Pricing in the Multilateral Trading System’, International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development, 2017.Google Scholar

Maskus, Keith, ‘Research and Development Subsidies: A Need for WTO Disciplines?’, International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development and World Economic Forum, 2015.Google Scholar

Matsumura, Wataru and Zakia, Adam, ‘Commentary: Fossil Fuel Consumption Subsidies Bounced Back Strongly in 2018’, 13 June 2019, www.iea.org/newsroom/news/2019/june/fossil-fuel-consumption-subsidies-bounced-back-strongly-in-2018.html.Google Scholar

Mavroidis, Petros C. and Neven, Damien J., ‘Greening the WTO Environmental Goods Agreement, Tariff Concessions, and Policy Likeness’, 22 Journal of International Economic Law 373 (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mavroidis, Petros C. and Wolfe, Robert, ‘Private Standards and the WTO: Reclusive No More’, 16 World Trade Review 1 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mayeda, Graham, ‘Integrating Environmental Impact Assessments into International Investment Agreements: Global Administrative Law and Transnational Cooperation’, 18 Journal of World Investment & Trade 131 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mayer, Benoit, The International Law on Climate Change (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McDaniels, Devin, Molina, Ana Cristina and Wijkström, Erik, ‘How Does the Regular Work of WTO Influence Regional Trade Agreements? The Case of International Standards and the TBT Committee’, WTO Staff Working Paper No. ERSD-2018-06, 2018.Google Scholar

McDonald, Jan, ‘Domestic Regulation, International Standards, and Technical Barriers to Trade’, 4 World Trade Review 249 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McGlade, Christophe and Ekins, Paul, ‘The Geographical Distribution of Fossil Fuels Unused When Limiting Global Warming to 2ᵒC’, 517 Nature 187 (2015).Google Scholar

Mclntyre, Owen and Mosedale, Thomas, ‘The Precautionary Principle as a Norm of Customary International Law’, 9 Journal of Environmental Law 221 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mehling, Michael A. et al., ‘Designing Border Carbon Adjustments for Enhanced Climate Action’, 113 American Journal of International Law 433 (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meltzer, Joshua, ‘Climate Change and Trade – The EU Aviation Directive and the WTO’, 15 Journal of International Economic Law 111 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Merrill, Laura et al., ‘Making the Switch: From Fossil Fuel Subsidies to Sustainable Energy’, Nordic Council of Ministers, 2017.Google Scholar

Merrill, Laura ‘Tackling Fossil Fuel Subsidies and Climate Change: Levelling the Energy Playing Field’, Nordic Council of Ministers, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meyer, Timothy, ‘Explaining Energy Disputes at the World Trade Organization’, 17 International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 391 (2017).Google Scholar

Mikulich, Christine, ‘ISO 14000–14001, The Developing World’s Perspective’, 17 Tulane Environmental Law Journal 117 (2003).Google Scholar

Miles, Kate, The Origins of International Investment Law: Empire, Environment and the Safeguarding of Capital (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Minas, Stephen, ‘The Paris Agreement’s Technology Framework and the Need for “Transformational Change”’, 2020(4) Carbon & Climate Law Review 241 (2020).Google Scholar

Ministry of Commerce and Industry (India), Final Findings: Anti-subsidy/Countervailing Duty Investigation Concerning Imports of Castings for Wind Operated Electricity Generators, Whether or Not Machined, in Raw, Finished or Sub-assembled Form, or as a Part of a Sub-Assembly, or as a Part of an Equipment/Component Meant for Wind-Operated Electricity Generators, Originating in or Exported from China PR, 27 November 2015.Google Scholar

Miroudot, Sébastien, ‘The Linkages between Open Services Markets and Technology Transfer’, OECD Trade Policy Working Paper No. 29, TD/TC/WP(2005)9/FINAL, 2006.Google Scholar

Moïsé, Evdokia and Rubínová, Stela, ‘Sustainability Impact Assessments of Free Trade Agreements: A Critical Review’, OECD Trade Policy Paper No. 255, 2021.Google Scholar

Molenbroek, Edith et al., ‘Savings and Benefits of Global Regulations for Energy Efficient Products: A “Cost of Non-World” Study, Final Report’, European Commission, 2015.Google Scholar

Molina, Ana Cristina and Khoroshavina, Vira, ‘TBT Provisions in Regional Trade Agreements: To What Extent Do They Go beyond the WTO TBT Agreement?’, WTO Staff Working Paper No. ERSD-2015-09, 2015.Google Scholar

Monteiro, José-Antonio, ‘Typology of Environment-Related Provisions in Regional Trade Agreements’, WTO Working Paper No. ERSD-2016-13, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Muchlinski, Peter, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility’, in Muchlinski, Peter, Ortino, Federico and Schreuer, Christoph (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Investment Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008), pp. 637–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Munro, James, Emissions Trading Schemes under International Economic Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018).Google Scholar

Naiki, Yoshiko, ‘Meta-Regulation of Private Standards: The Role of Regional and International Organizations in Comparison with the WTO’, 20 World Trade Review 1 (2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nelson, David et al., ‘Moving to a Low-Carbon Economy: The Impact of Policy Pathways on Fossil Fuel Asset Values’, Climate Policy Initiative, 2014.Google Scholar

New Zealand Foreign Affairs and Trade, ‘Agreement on Climate Change, Trade and Sustainability (ACCTS) Negotiations’, www.mfat.govt.nz/en/trade/free-trade-agreements/trade-and-climate/agreement-on-climate-change-trade-and-sustainability-accts-negotiations/.Google Scholar

New Zealand Foreign Affairs and Trade, ‘New Zealand with Costa Rica, Fiji, Iceland, Norway and Switzerland Have Launched a New Initiative – the Agreement on Climate Change, Trade and Sustainability (ACCTS)’, www.mfat.govt.nz/en/trade/free-trade-agreements/trade-and-climate/agreement-on-climate-change-trade-and-sustainability-accts-negotiations/.Google Scholar

New Zealand Government, ‘Joint Statement: Agreement on Climate Change, Trade and Sustainability (ACCTS) at MC12’, 15 June 2022, www.beehive.govt.nz/release/joint-statement-agreement-climate-change-trade-and-sustainability-accts-mc12.Google Scholar

Nordås, Hildegunn Kyvik and Steenblik, Ronald, ‘Environmental Services in the APEC Region: Definition, Challenges and Opportunities’, APEC Group on Services, 2021.Google Scholar

Nordhaus, William, ‘Climate Clubs: Overcoming Free-Riding in International Climate Policy’, 105 American Economic Review 1339 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

OECD, ‘Agreement Reached at OECD to End Export Credit Support for Unabated Coal-Fired Power Plants’, 22 October 2021, www.oecd.org/newsroom/agreement-reached-at-oecd-to-end-export-credit-support-for-unabated-coal-fired-power-plants.htm.Google Scholar

Nordhaus, William, ‘Cases Handled by the National Contact Points for Responsible Business Conduct’, https://mneguidelines.oecd.org/Flyer-OECD-National-Contact-Points.pdf.Google Scholar

Nordhaus, William, ‘The Climate Action Monitor 2022: Helping Countries Advance Towards Net Zero’, OECD, 2022.Google Scholar

Nordhaus, William, ‘Climate Finance and the USD 100 Billion Goal’, www.oecd.org/climate-change/finance-usd-100-billion-goal/.Google Scholar

Nordhaus, William, ‘Climate Policy Leadership in an Interconnected World: What Role for Border Carbon Adjustments?’, 2020.Google Scholar

Nordhaus, William, ‘Effects of Eco-Labelling Schemes: Compilation of Recent Studies’, COM/ENV/TD(2004)34/FINAL, 2005.Google Scholar

Nordhaus, William, ‘The Environmental Goods and Services Industry: Manual for Data Collection and Analysis’, 1999, https://unstats.un.org/unsd/envaccounting/ceea/archive/EPEA/EnvIndustry_Manual_for_data_collection.PDF.Google Scholar

Nordhaus, William, ‘Environmental Labelling and Information Schemes’, Policy Perspectives: Synthesis Report, 2016.Google Scholar

Nordhaus, William, ‘Going Green: Best Practices for Sustainable Procurement’, 2015.Google Scholar

Nordhaus, William, ‘International Regulatory Co-operation: Addressing Global Challenges’, 2013.Google Scholar

Nordhaus, William, ‘OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises: 2011 Edition’, 2011.Google Scholar

Nordhaus, William, ‘OECD Inventory of Support Measures for Fossil Fuels: Database Brochure’, 2019, www.oecd.org/fossil-fuels/data/OECD-Fossil-Fuels-Support-database-brochure-2019.pdf.Google Scholar

Nordhaus, William, ‘OECD Work on Support for Fossil Fuels’, www.oecd.org/fossil-fuels/.Google Scholar

Nordhaus, William, ‘Overcoming Barriers to International Investment in Clean Energy’, OECD, 2015.Google Scholar

Nordhaus, William, ‘The Role of OECD Instruments on Responsible Business Conduct in Progressing Environmental Objectives’, 2021.Google Scholar

Nordhaus, William, ‘State-Owned Enterprises as Global Competitors: A Challenge or an Opportunity?’, 2016.Google Scholar

Nordhaus, William, ‘Support for Fossil Fuels Almost Doubled in 2021, Slowing Progress toward International Climate Goals, according to New Analysis from OECD and IEA’, 29 August 2022, www.oecd.org/newsroom/support-for-fossil-fuels-almost-doubled-in-2021-slowing-progress-toward-international-climate-goals-according-to-new-analysis-from-oecd-and-iea.htm.OECD and IEA, ‘Update on Recent Progress in Reform of Inefficient Fossil-Fuel Subsidies That Encourage Wasteful Consumption’, 2019.Google Scholar

OECD/WTO, ‘Facilitating Trade through Regulatory Cooperation: The Case of the WTO’s TBT/SPS Agreements and Committees’, 2019.Google Scholar

Oehler, Richard L. and Vega, Vivian R., ‘Worldwide Vaccine Inequality Threatens to Unleash the Next COVID-19 Variant’, 123 International Journal of Infectious Diseases 133 (2022).Google ScholarPubMed

Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, OECD and World Bank, ‘Analysis of the Scope of Energy Subsidies and Suggestions for the G-20 Initiative’, Joint Report (prepared for submission to the G-20 Summit Meeting in Toronto (Canada), 26–27 June 2010), 2010.Google Scholar

Ortolani, Pietro, ‘Intra-EU Arbitral Awards vis-à-vis Article 107 TFEU: State Aid Law as a Limit to Compliance’, 6 Journal of International Dispute Settlement 118 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Osakwe, Chiedu, Yu, Dayong and Beslać, Petra, ‘Export Duty Commitments: The Treaty Dialogue and the Pattern of Commitments’, in Dadush, Uri and Osakwe, Chiedu (eds.), WTO Accessions and Trade Multilateralism: Case Studies and Lessons from the WTO at Twenty (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015), pp. 741–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Papaefstratiou, Athina Fouchard, ‘Stabilisation Clauses in Long-Term Investment Contracts: Their Evolution and Their Application by Investment Tribunals’, in Cima, Elena and Mbengue, Makane Moïse (eds.), A Multifaceted Approach to Trade Liberalisation and Investment Protection in the Energy Sector (Leiden and Boston: Brill, Nijhoff, 2021), pp. 43–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Parry, Ian, Black, Simon and Vernon, Nate, ‘Still Not Getting Energy Prices Right: A Global and Country Update of Fossil Fuel Subsidies’, IMF Working Paper No. WP/21/236, 2021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Partiti, Enrico, ‘What Use Is an Unloaded Gun? The Substantive Discipline of the WTO TBT Code of Good Practice and Its Application to Private Standards Pursuing Public Objectives’, 20 Journal of International Economic Law 829 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pauer, Stefan U., ‘Including Electricity Imports in California’s Cap-And-Trade Program: A Case Study of a Border Carbon Adjustment in Practice’, 31 The Electricity Journal 39 (2018).Google Scholar

Pauwelyn, Joost, ‘U.S. Federal Climate Policy and Competitiveness Concerns: The Limits and Options of International Trade Law’, Working Paper No. NI WP 07-02, Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions at Duke University, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pauwelyn, Joost and Kleimann, David, ‘Trade Related Aspects of a Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: A Legal Assessment’, Briefing, European Parliament, 2020.Google Scholar

Peels, Rafael et al., ‘Corporate Social Responsibility in International Trade and Investment Agreements: Implications for States, Business, and Workers’, ILO Research Paper No. 13, 2016.Google Scholar

Pereira, Ricardo and Gough, Orla, ‘Permanent Sovereignty over Natural Resources in the Twenty-first Century: Natural Resource Governance and the Right to Self-Determination of Indigenous Peoples under International Law’, 14 Melbourne Journal of International Law 451 (2013).Google Scholar

Perrez, Franz Xaver, ‘The Relationship between “Permanent Sovereignty” and the Obligation Not to Cause Transboundary Environmental Damage’, 26 Environmental Law 1187 (1996).Google Scholar

Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich, Transforming World Trade and Investment Law for Sustainable Development (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pfeifer, Sylvia and Pickard, Jim, ‘UK to Propose Carbon Border Tax as Part of Steel Industry Aid Package’, Financial Times, 24 January 2023, www.ft.com/content/94eab3e5-87dd-424f-9c5a-be0d79d7cb5c.Google Scholar

Pogoretskyy, Vitaliy, ‘Energy Dual Pricing in International Trade: Subsidies and Anti-dumping Perspectives’, in Selivanova, Yulia (ed.), Regulation of Energy in International Trade Law: WTO, NAFTA and Energy Charter (Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2011), pp. 181–228.Google Scholar

Pogoretskyy, Vitaliy, Freedom of Transit and Access to Gas Pipeline Networks under WTO Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pomerleau, Shuting, ‘What’s in the Carbon Border Adjustment Bill Introduced by Senator Whitehouse?’, 8 June 2022, Niskanen Center, www.niskanencenter.org/whats-in-the-carbon-border-adjustment-bill-introduced-by-senator-whitehouse.Google Scholar

Prag, Andrew, ‘The Climate Challenge and Trade: Would Border Carbon Adjustments Accelerate or Hinder Climate Action?’, OECD, 2020.Google Scholar

Prag, Andrew, Lyon, Thomas and Russillo, Aimée, ‘Multiplication of Environmental Labelling and Information Schemes (ELIS): Implications for Environment and Trade’, OECD Environment Working Paper No. 106, ENV/WKP(2016)8, 2016.Google Scholar

Probst, Benedict et al., ‘The Short-Term Costs of Local Content Requirements in the Indian Solar Auctions’, 5 Nature Energy 842 (2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Qin, Julia Ya, ‘Forced Technology Transfer and the US–China Trade War: Implications for International Economic Law’, 22 Journal of International Economic Law 743 (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Qin, Julia Ya, ‘Reforming WTO Discipline on Export Duties: Sovereignty over Natural Resources, Economic Development and Environmental Protection’, 46 Journal of World Trade 1147 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Quick, Reinhard and Lau, Christian, ‘Environmentally Motivated Tax Distinctions and WTO Law: The European Commission’s Green Paper on Integrated Product Policy in Light of the “Like Product‐” and “PPM‐” Debates’, 6 Journal of International Economic Law 419 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reinsch, William A., Benson, Emily and Puga, Catherine, ‘Environmental Goods Agreement: A New Frontier or an Old Stalemate?’, Centre for Strategic and International Studies, 2021.Google Scholar

REN21, ‘Renewables 2019: Global Status Report’, 2019.Google Scholar

Ripinsky, Sergey, ‘The System of Gas Dual Pricing in Russia: Compatibility with WTO Rules’, 3 World Trade Review 463 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ritchie, Hannah, Roser, Max and Rosado, Pablo (2020), ‘CO₂ and Greenhouse Gas Emissions’, OurWorldInData.org, 2020, https://ourworldindata.org/co2-and-greenhouse-gas-emissions.Google Scholar

Rive, Vernon, ‘Anatomy of an International Norm Entrepreneur: The Friends of Fossil Fuel Subsidy Reform’, in Skovgaard, Jakob and van Asselt, Harro (eds.), The Politics of Fossil Fuel Subsidies and Their Reform (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018), pp. 156–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roffe, Pedro, ‘UNCTAD: Code of Conduct for the Transfer of Technology – Progress and Issues under Negotiation’, 14 Journal of World Trade Law 160 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rokadiya, Shikha and Yang, Zifei, ‘Overview of Global Zero-Emission Vehicle Mandate Programs’, International Council on Clean Transportation, Briefing, 2019.Google Scholar

Rolland, Sonia E., Development at the World Trade Organization (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rubini, Luca, ‘Ain’t Wastin’ Time No More: Subsidies for Renewable Energy, The SCM Agreement, Policy Space, and Law Reform’, 15 Journal of International Economic Law 525 (2012).Google Scholar

Sacerdoti, Giorgio, ‘The Application of BITs in Time of Economic Crisis: Limits to Their Coverage, Necessity and the Relevance of WTO Law’, in Sacerdoti, Giorgio et al. (eds.), General Interests of Host States in International Investment Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014), pp. 3–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Salehi-Isfahani, Djavad, Stucki, Bryce Wilson and Deutschmann, Joshua, ‘The Reform of Energy Subsidies in Iran: The Role of Cash Transfers’, 51 Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 1144 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sands, Philippe et al., Principles of International Environmental Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018), 4th ed.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sauvage, Jehan, ‘The Stringency of Environmental Regulations and Trade in Environmental Goods’, OECD Trade and Environment Working Paper, COM/TAD/ENV/JWPTE(2013)33/FINAL, 2014.Google Scholar

Savatic, Filip, ‘Fossil Fuel Subsidy Reform: Lessons from the Indonesian Case’, Studies No. 06/16, IDDRI, 2016.Google Scholar

Scherer, Maxi (ed.), International Arbitration in the Energy Sector (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018).Google Scholar

Scherer, Maxi, Bruce, Stuart and Reschke, Juliane, ‘Environmental Counterclaims in Investment Treaty Arbitration’, 36 ICSID Review 413 (2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schill, Stephan W., ‘Do Investment Treaties Chill Unilateral State Regulation to Mitigate Climate Change?’, 24 Journal of International Arbitration 469 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schrijver, Nico J., ‘Natural Resources, Permanent Sovereignty Over’, in Wolfrum, Rüdiger (ed.), The Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008), Vol. VII, pp. 535–544.Google Scholar

Schrijver, Nicolaas, ‘Self-Determination of Peoples and Sovereignty over Natural Wealth and Resources’, in UN Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner, Realizing the Right to Development: Essays in Commemoration of 25 Years of the United Nations Declaration on the Right to Development (New York and Geneva: UN, 2013), pp. 95–102.Google Scholar

Selivanova, Julia, ‘World Trade Organization Rules and Energy Pricing: Russia’s Case’, 38 Journal of World Trade 559 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Selivanova, Yulia (ed.), Regulation of Energy in International Trade Law: WTO, NAFTA and Energy Charter (Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2011).Google Scholar

Shadikhodjaev, Sherzod, ‘Checking RTA Compatibility with Global Trade Rules: WTO Litigation Practice and Implications from the Transparency Mechanism for RTAs’, 45 Journal of World Trade 529 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shadikhodjaev, Sherzod, ‘First WTO Judicial Review of Climate Change Subsidy Issues’, 107 American Journal of International Law 864 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shadikhodjaev, Sherzod, ‘How to Pass a Pass-through Test: The Case of Input Subsidies’, 15 Journal of International Economic Law 621 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shadikhodjaev, Sherzod, ‘India – Certain Measures Relating to Solar Cells and Solar Modules’, 111 American Journal of International Law 139 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shadikhodjaev, Sherzod, ‘Industrial Policy in Asia-Pacific Integration: Localization Measures and Subsidies in ASEAN Countries, 31 Asia Pacific Law Review 618 (2023).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shadikhodjaev, Sherzod, Industrial Policy and the World Trade Organization: Between Legal Constraints and Flexibilities (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shadikhodjaev, Sherzod, ‘Input Cost Adjustments and WTO Anti-Dumping Law: A Closer Look at the EU Practice’, 18 World Trade Review 81 (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shadikhodjaev, Sherzod, ‘Non-Market Economies, Significant Market Distortions, and the 2017 EU Anti-Dumping Amendment’, 21 Journal of International Economic Law 885 (2018).Google Scholar

Shadikhodjaev, Sherzod, ‘Promotion of “Green” Electricity and International Dispute Settlement: Trade and Investment Issues’, 49 International Lawyer 343 (2016).Google Scholar

Shadikhodjaev, Sherzod, ‘Renewable Energy and Government Support: Time to “Green” the SCM Agreement?’, 14 World Trade Review 479 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shadikhodjaev, Sherzod, ‘Russia and Energy Issues under the WTO System’, 50 Journal of World Trade 705 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shadikhodjaev, Sherzod, ‘Steel Overcapacity and the Global Trading System’, 16 Asian Journal of WTO & International Health Law and Policy 179 (2021).Google Scholar

Shadikhodjaev, Sherzod, ‘Technological Neutrality and Regulation of Digital Trade: How Far Can We Go?’, 32 European Journal of International Law 1221 (2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shadikhodjaev, Sherzod, ‘United States – Safeguard Measure on Imports of Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Products’, 116 American Journal of International Law 842 (2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shadikhodjaev, Sherzod and Park, Nohyoung, ‘Cessation and Reparation in the GATT/WTO Legal System: A View from the Law of State Responsibility’, 41 Journal of World Trade 1237 (2007).Google Scholar

Shao, Xuan, ‘Environmental and Human Rights Counterclaims in International Investment Arbitration: At the Crossroads of Domestic and International Law’, 24 Journal of International Economic Law 157 (2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sharma, Radhika, ‘Countervailing Duty Laws in India’, 11 December 2015, www.lakshmisri.com/insights/articles/countervailing-duty-laws-in-india/#.Google Scholar

Sherlock, Molly F., ‘Clean Vehicle Tax Credits in the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022’, US Congressional Research Service, 2022, https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IN/IN11996.Google Scholar

Sifonios, David, Environmental Process and Production Methods (PPMs) in WTO Law (Cham: Springer, 2018).Google Scholar

Sklarew, Jennifer F., ‘How Can China and India Serve as Models for Developing Nations Striving to Build Absorption Capacity for Renewable Energy Technologies?’, 2 Renewable Energy Law and Policy Review 181 (2011).Google Scholar

Sornarajah, M., The International Law on Foreign Investment (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010), 3rd ed.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Spears, Suzanne A., ‘The Quest for Policy Space in a New Generation of International Investment Agreements’, 13 Journal of International Economic Law 1037 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Special Eurobarometer 492, ‘Europeans’ Attitudes on EU Energy Policy: Summary’, May 2019, https://ec.europa.eu/commfrontoffice/publicopinion/index.cfm/survey/getsurveydetail/instruments/special/surveyky/2238.Google Scholar

Steenblik, Ronald, Sauvage, Jehan and Timiliotis, Christina, ‘Fossil Fuel Subsidies and the Global Trade Regime’, in Skovgaard, Jakob and van Asselt, Harro (eds.), The Politics of Fossil Fuel Subsidies and Their Reform (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018), pp. 121–139.Google Scholar

Stefan, Florian, ‘A Reflection on the Czech Republic’s Solar Investment Arbitration Successes’, PSL LexisNexis News Analysis, 1 October 2019, www.lexisnexis.com/uk/lexispsl/energy/document/412012/5X5P-71G3-CGXG-01J7-00000–00/A_reflection_on_the_Czech_Republic_s_solar_investment_arbitration_successes.Google Scholar

Struckmann, Kai, Forwood, Genevra and Kadri, Aqeel, ‘Investor-State Arbitrations and EU State Aid Rules: Conflict or Co-existence?’, 15 European State Aid Law Quarterly 258 (2016).Google Scholar

Swanson, Ana, ‘U.S. Proposes Green Steel Club That Would Levy Tariffs On Outliers’, The New York Times, 7 December 2022, www.nytimes.com/2022/12/07/business/economy/steel-tariffs-climate-change.html.Google Scholar

Sykes, Alan O., ‘The Economics of WTO Rules on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures’, John M. Olin Program in Law and Economics Working Paper No. 186 (2003), University of Chicago.Google Scholar

Teehankee, Manuel A. J., Trade and Environment Governance at the World Trade Organization Committee on Trade and Environment (Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2020).Google Scholar

Tienhaara, Kyla, The Expropriation of Environmental Governance: Protecting Foreign Investors at the Expense of Public Policy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Titi, Aikaterini, The Right to Regulate in International Investment Law (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Titievskaia, Jana, ‘Sustainability Provisions in EU Free Trade Agreements: Review of the European Commission Action Plan’, European Parliamentary Research Service, Briefing, 2021.Google Scholar

Tyagi, Yogesh, ‘Permanent Sovereignty over Natural Resources’, 4 Cambridge Journal of International and Comparative Law 588 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs, ‘Central Product Classification (CPC) Version 2.1’, Statistical Papers, ST/ESA/STAT/SER.M/77/Ver.2.1, 2015.Google Scholar

UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs, ‘New Issues Requiring Guidance in the Central Product Classification (CPC)’, Meeting of the Expert Group on International Statistical Classifications, New York, 19–22 May 2015, ESA/STAT/AC.289/20, 12 May 2015.Google Scholar

UN Department of International Economic and Social Affairs, ‘Provisional Central Product Classification’, Statistical Papers, ST/ESA/STAT/SER.M/77, 1991.Google Scholar

UN Economic Commission for Europe, ‘Working Party on Pollution and Energy – Introduction’, https://unece.org/transportvehicle-regulations/working-party-pollution-and-energy-introduction.Google Scholar

UN, ‘2020 United Nations Energy Statistics Yearbook’, 2020, https://unstats.un.org/unsd/energystats/pubs/yearbook/2020/04d.pdf.Google Scholar

UN, ‘Nationally Determined Contributions under the Paris Agreement: Synthesis Report by the Secretariat’, Conference of the Parties Serving as the Meeting of the Parties to the Paris Agreement, FCCC/PA/CMA/2022/4, 26 October 2022.Google Scholar

UN, ‘Report of the Conference of the Parties on Its Twenty-Seventh Session, Held in Sharm el-Sheikh from 6 to 20 November 2022’, Decision 1/CP.27, FCCC/CP/2022/10/Add.1, 17 March 2023.Google Scholar

UNCITRAL Working Group III, ‘Possible Reform of Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS): Multiple Proceedings and Counterclaims’, Note by the Secretariat, Thirty-ninth Session, New York, 30 March–3 April 2020, A/CN.9/WG.III/WP.193, 22 January 2020.Google Scholar

UNCTAD, ‘Compendium of International Arrangements on Transfer of Technology: Selected Instruments’, UNCTAD/ITE/IPC/Misc.5, 2001.Google Scholar

UNCTAD, ‘A European Union Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: Implications for Developing Countries’, 2021.Google Scholar

UNCTAD, ‘Expropriation’, UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements II, 2012.Google Scholar

UNCTAD, ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment’, 2012.Google Scholar

UNCTAD, ‘International Investment Agreements Navigator’, https://investmentpolicy.unctad.org/international-investment-agreements.Google Scholar

UNCTAD, ‘International Investment Agreements Reform Accelerator’, 2020.Google Scholar

UNCTAD, ‘The International Investment Treaty Regime and Climate Action’, IIA Issues Note: International Investment Agreements, Issue No. 3, 2022.Google Scholar

UNCTAD, ‘Investment Dispute Settlement Navigator’, https://investmentpolicy.unctad.org/investment-dispute-settlement. ‘The Role of Science, Technology and Innovation in Promoting Renewable Energy by 2030’, 2019.Google Scholar

UNCTAD, ‘Transfer of Technology’, UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreement, 2001.Google Scholar

UNCTAD, ‘Treaty-Based Investor–State Dispute Settlement Cases and Climate Action’, IIA Issues Note: International Investment Agreements, Issue No. 4, 2022.Google Scholar

UNEP, ‘Actions on Air Quality: A Global Summary of Policies and Programmes to Reduce Air Pollution’, 2021.Google Scholar

UNEP, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility and Regional Trade and Investment Agreements’, 2011.Google Scholar

UNEP, ‘Measuring Fossil Fuel Subsidies in the Context of the Sustainable Development Goals’, 2019.Google Scholar

UNFCCC, ‘What Is Technology Development and Transfer?’, https://unfccc.int/topics/climate-technology/the-big-picture/what-is-technology-development-and-transfer.Google Scholar

US International Trade Commission, ‘Renewable Energy and Related Services: Recent Developments’, Investigation No. 332-534, USITC Publication 4421, 2013.Google Scholar

US Trade Representative, ‘2021 Trade Policy Agenda and 2020 Annual Report of the President of the United States on the Trade Agreements Program’, 2021.Google Scholar

US Trade Representative, ‘Report on the Appellate Body of the World Trade Organization’, 2020.Google Scholar

US White House, ‘Biden-Harris Administration Releases Inflation Reduction Act Guidebook for Clean Energy and Climate Programs’, 15 December 2022, www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2022/12/15/biden-harris-administration-releases-inflation-reduction-act-guidebook-for-clean-energy-and-climate-programs/.Google Scholar

US White House, ‘Statement on Indo-Pacific Economic Framework for Prosperity’, 23 May 2022, www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2022/05/23/statement-on-indo-pacific-economic-framework-for-prosperity.Google Scholar

USDOC, Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Affirmative Determination of the Countervailing Duty Investigation of Forged Steel Fluid End Blocks from the Federal Republic of Germany [C-428-848], 7 December 2020.Google Scholar

USDOC, Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Determination in the Countervailing Duty Investigation of Forged Steel Fluid End Blocks from Italy [C-475-841], 7 December 2020.Google Scholar

USDOC, Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Determination in the Countervailing Duty Investigation of Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not Assembled Into Modules, from the People’s Republic of China [C-570-980], 9 October 2012.Google Scholar

USDOC, Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Determination in the Countervailing Duty Investigation of Utility Scale Wind Towers (Wind Towers) from the People’s Republic of China [C-570-982], 17 December 2012.Google Scholar

USDOC, Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Determination in the Countervailing Duty Investigation of Bottom Mount Combination Refrigerator-Freezers from the Republic of Korea [C-580-866], 16 March 2012.Google Scholar

USDOC, Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Determination in the Countervailing Duty Investigation of Large Residential Washers from the Republic of Korea [C-580-869], 18 December 2012.Google Scholar

USDOC, ‘Steel and Aluminum U.S.–EU Joint Statement’, 31 October 2021, www.commerce.gov/news/fact-sheets/2021/10/steel-and-aluminum-us-eu-joint-statement.Google Scholar

Vadi, Valentina, ‘Beyond Known Worlds: Climate Change Governance by Arbitral Tribunals?’, 48 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 1285 (2015).Google Scholar

Veel, Paul-Erik, ‘Carbon Tariffs and the WTO: An Evaluation of Feasible Policies’, 12 Journal of International Economic Law 749 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Viñuales, Jorge E., Foreign Investment and the Environment in International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Vossenaar, Rene, ‘The APEC List of Environmental Goods: An Analysis of the Outcome & Expected Impact’, ICTSD Issue Paper No. 18, 2013.Google Scholar

Vranes, Erich, Trade and the Environment: Fundamental Issues in International Law, WTO Law, and Legal Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Watal, Jayashree and Caminero, Leticia, ‘Least-Developed Countries, Transfer of Technology and the TRIPS Agreement’, WTO Staff Working Paper No. ERSD-2018-01, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Whitley, Shelagh and van der Burg, Laurie, ‘Fossil Fuel Subsidy Reform: From Rhetoric to Reality’, Working Paper, New Climate Economy, 2015.Google Scholar

Wiesbrock, Anja, ‘An Obligation for Sustainable Procurement? Gauging the Potential Impact of Article 11 TFEU on Public Contracting in the EU’, 40 Legal Issues of Economic Integration 105 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

WIPO, ‘Transfer of Technology’, Standing Committee on the Law of Patents, Fourteenth Session (Geneva, 25–29 January 2010), SCP/14/4 REV.2, 26 October 2011.Google Scholar

Wolfrum, Rüdiger, Stoll, Peter-Tobias and Koebele, Michael (eds.), WTO – Trade Remedies (Leiden/Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2008).Google Scholar

Wolfrum, Rüdiger, Stoll, Peter-Tobias and Hestermeyer, Holger P. (eds.), WTO – Trade in Goods (Leiden, Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2011).World Bank and WTO, ‘The Role of Trade in Developing Countries’ Road to Recovery’, Joint Policy Note, 2022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

World Bank, ‘State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2022’, 2022.Google Scholar

World Bank, ‘What Is Carbon Pricing?’, https://carbonpricingdashboard.worldbank.org/what-carbon-pricing.Google Scholar

World Commission on Environment and Development, ‘Our Common Future’, Report, UN, 1987.Google Scholar

WTO, ‘Chair Cites “Chronic” Low Compliance with Subsidy Notification Requirements’, 27 October 2020, www.wto.org/english/news_e/news20_e/scm_27oct20_e.htm.Google Scholar

WTO, ‘Climate Change and International Trade’, World Trade Report 2022, 2022.Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on Government Procurement – Report (2022) of the Committee on Government Procurement, GPA/AR/5, 8 December 2022.Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on SCM – Notification Provisions under the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures – Background Note by the Secretariat – Revision, G/SCM/W/546/Rev.13, 31 March 2022.Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on SPS Measures – Existing Definitions of Private Standards in Other International Organizations – Note by the Secretariat – Revision, G/SPS/GEN/1334/Rev.1, 5 August 2014.Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on SPS Measures – Private Industry Standards – Communication from Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, G/SPS/GEN/766, 28 February 2007.Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on SPS Measures – Report of the Co-Stewards of the Private Standards E-Working Group to the March 2015 Meeting of the SPS Committee on Action 1 (G/SPS/55) – Submission by the Co-Stewards of the E-Working Group, G/SPS/W/283, 17 March 2015.Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on SPS Measures – Review of the Operation and Implementation of the SPS Agreement – Report adopted by the Committee on 14 July 2017, G/SPS/62, 25 July 2017.Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on SPS Measures – Summary of the Meeting Held on 29–30 June 2005 – Note by the Secretariat – Revision, G/SPS/R/37/Rev.1, 18 August 2005.Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on TBT – Actions to Increase Participation of Developing Country Members in the Work of Relevant International Standard Setting Organizations – Information from International Organizations – Report of the Director-General, G/TBT/W/172, 27 February 2002.Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on TBT – Agreement Reached by a Member with Another Country or Countries on Issues Related to Technical Regulations, Standards or Conformity Assessment Procedures – Notification – The Separate Customs Territory of Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu, G/TBT/10.7/N/146, 8 February 2018.Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on TBT – Agreement Reached by a Member with Another Country or Countries on Issues Related to Technical Regulations, Standards or Conformity Assessment Procedures – Notification – Japan and the Republic of Singapore, G/TBT/10.7/N/45, 17 July 2003.Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on TBT – Agreement Reached by a Member with Another Country or Countries on Issues Related to Technical Regulations, Standards or Conformity Assessment Procedures – The European Communities and Switzerland – Notification, G/TBT/10.7/N/44, 29 January 2003.Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on TBT – Agreement Reached by a Member with Another Country or Countries on Issues Related to Technical Regulations, Standards or Conformity Assessment Procedures – Notification – Japan and European Community – Telecommunications […] Products and Medicinal Products, G/TBT/10.7/N/37, 31 May 2002.Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on TBT – Agreement Reached by a Member with Another Country or Countries on Issues Related to Technical Regulations, Standards or Conformity Assessment Procedures – Notification – Ukraine, G/TBT/10.7/N/147, 23 February 2018.Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on TBT – Agreement Reached by a Member with Another Country or Countries on Issues Related to Technical Regulations, Standards or Conformity Assessment Procedures – Notification – Ukraine, G/TBT/10.7/N/144, 30 March 2017.Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on TBT – Colombia – Proposed Modifications to Resolutions 910/2008 and 2604/2009 on Pollutant Emissions from Heavy Vehicles with Diesel Engines – (G/TBT/N/COL/185 and G/TBT/N/COL/186) – Statement by Mexico to the Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade – 6–7 March 2013, G/TBT/W/362, 21 March 2013.Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on TBT – Decisions and Recommendations Adopted by the WTO Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade since 1 January 1995 – Note by the Secretariat – Revision, G/TBT/1/Rev.14, 24 September 2019.Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on TBT – European Union – Amendments to the Directive 2009/28/EC, Renewable Energy Directive – Statement by the European Union to the Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade – 21 and 22 March 2018, G/TBT/W/474, 17 April 2018.Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on TBT – European Union – Draft Commission Regulation Laying Down Eco-Design Requirements for Electronic Displays Pursuant to Directive 2009/125/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, Amending Commission Regulation (EC) No. 1275/2008 […] – 6 and 7 March 2019, G/TBT/W/606, 22 March 2019.Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on TBT – European Union – Draft Commission Regulation Laying Down Eco-Design Requirements for Electronic Displays Pursuant to Directive 2009/125/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, Amending Commission Regulation (EC) No. 1275/2008 […] – 20 and 21 June 2019, G/TBT/W/672, 23 July 2019.Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on TBT – Fifth Triennial Review of the Operation and Implementation of the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade under Article 15.4, G/TBT/26, 13 November 2009.Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on TBT – Fourth Triennial Review of the Operation and Implementation of the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade under Article 15.4, G/TBT/19, 14 November 2006.Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on TBT – Minutes of the Meeting of 1 July 2004 – Chairperson: Mr. Sudhakar Dalela (India) – Note by the Secretariat, G/TBT/M/33, 31 August 2004.Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on TBT – Minutes of the Meeting of 10–11 November 2011 – Note by the Secretariat, G/TBT/M/55, 9 February 2012.Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on TBT – Minutes of the Meeting of 12–15 November 2019 – Note by the Secretariat, G/TBT/M/79, 30 January 2020.Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on TBT – Minutes of the Meeting of 13–14 May 2020 – Written Procedure on Specific Trade Concerns – Note by the Secretariat, G/TBT/M/81, 26 June 2020.Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on TBT – Minutes of the Meeting of 13–15 June 2012 – Note by the Secretariat, G/TBT/M/57, 18 September 2012.Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on TBT – Minutes of the Meeting of 15–16 June 2011 – Note by the Secretariat, G/TBT/M/54, 20 September 2011.Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on TBT – Minutes of the Meeting of 15–16 June 2016 – Note by the Secretariat, G/TBT/M/69, 22 September 2016.Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on TBT – Minutes of the Meeting of 16–17 June 2005 – Note by the Secretariat, G/TBT/M/36, 4 August 2005.Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on TBT – Minutes of the Meeting of 17, 19 and 20 June 2013 – Note by the Secretariat, G/TBT/M/60, 23 September 2013.Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on TBT – Minutes of the Meeting of 18–19 March 2009 – Note by the Secretariat, G/TBT/M/47, 5 June 2009.Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on TBT – Minutes of the Meeting of 18–19 March 2015 – Note by the Secretariat, G/TBT/M/65, 28 May 2015.Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on TBT – Minutes of the Meeting of 2 November 2005 – Note by the Secretariat, G/TBT/M/37, 22 December 2005.Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on TBT – Minutes of the Meeting of 20–21 June 2019 – Note by the Secretariat, G/TBT/M/78, 23 September 2019.Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on TBT – Minutes of the Meeting of 21–22 March 2018 – Note by the Secretariat, G/TBT/M/74, 22 May 2018.Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on TBT – Minutes of the Meeting of 23–24 June 2010 – Note by the Secretariat, G/TBT/M/51, 1 October 2010.Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on TBT – Minutes of the Meeting of 24–25 March 2010 – Note by the Secretariat, G/TBT/M/50, 28 May 2010.Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on TBT – Minutes of the Meeting of 24–25 March 2011 – Note by the Secretariat, G/TBT/M/53, 26 May 2011.Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on TBT – Minutes of the Meeting of 24–26 February 2021 – Note by the Secretariat, G/TBT/M/83, 21 April 2021.Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on TBT – Minutes of the Meeting of 25–26 June 2009 – Note by the Secretariat, G/TBT/M/48, 29 September 2009.Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on TBT – Minutes of the Meeting of 29–30 March 2017 – Note by the Secretariat, G/TBT/M/71, 2 June 2017.Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on TBT – Minutes of the Meeting of 30–31 October 2013 – Chairperson: Mr. Jingo Kikukawa – Note by the Secretariat, G/TBT/M/61, 5 February 2014.Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on TBT – Minutes of the Meeting of 4–6 November 2015 – Note by the Secretariat, G/TBT/M/67, 3 February 2016.Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on TBT – Minutes of the Meeting of 5–6 November 2014 – Note by the Secretariat – Revision, G/TBT/M/64/Rev.1, 6 March 2015.Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on TBT – Minutes of the Meeting of 5 July 2007 – Note by the Secretariat, G/TBT/M/42, 6 August 2007.Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on TBT – Minutes of the Meeting of 6–7 March 2013 – Note by the Secretariat, G/TBT/M/59, 8 May 2013.Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on TBT – Minutes of the Meeting of 6–7 March 2019 – Note by the Secretariat, G/TBT/M/77, 15 May 2019.Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on TBT – Minutes of the Meeting of 8–9 November 2017 – Note by the Secretariat, G/TBT/M/73, 6 March 2018.Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on TBT – Minutes of the Meeting of 9–10 March 2016 – Note by the Secretariat, G/TBT/M/68, 12 May 2016.Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on TBT – Minutes of the Meeting of 9 November 2006 – Note by the Secretariat, G/TBT/M/40, 26 January 2007.Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on TBT – Ninth Triennial Review of the Operation and Implementation of the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade under Article 15.4, G/TBT/46, 17 November 2021.Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on TBT – Notification – Switzerland – Diesel Passenger Cars, G/TBT/N/CHE/39, 5 March 2004.Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on TBT – Notification – Switzerland – Diesel Passenger Cars, G/TBT/N/CHE/67, 11 August 2006.Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on TBT – Second Triennial Review of the Operation and Implementation of the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade, G/TBT/9, 13 November 2000.Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on TBT – Sixth Triennial Review of the Operation and Implementation of the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade under article 15.4, G/TBT/32, 29 November 2012.Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on TBT – Twenty-Fifth Annual Review of the Implementation and Operation of the TBT Agreement – Note by the Secretariat, G/TBT/44, 19 February 2020.Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on Trade and Development – Special and Differential Treatment Provisions in WTO Agreements and Decisions – Note by the Secretariat, WT/COMTD/W/271, 16 March 2023.Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on Trade and Environment – Committee on TBT – Negotiating History of the Coverage of the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade with Regard to Labelling Requirements, Voluntary Standards, and Processes and Production Methods Unrelated to Product Characteristics – Note by the Secretariat, WT/CTE/W/10, G/TBT/W/11, 29 August 1995.Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on Trade and Environment – Communication on Trade and Environmental Sustainability – Communication from Australia; Canada; Chad; Chile; Costa Rica; EU; The Gambia; Fiji; Iceland; Japan; Korea; […]; and the UK, WT/CTE/W/249, 17 November 2020.Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on Trade and Environment – Environment and Services, WT/CTE/W/9, 8 June 1995.Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on Trade and Environment – Environmental (Sustainability) Assessments of Trade Liberalization Agreements at the National Level – Item 2 of the Work Programme – Note by the Secretariat, WT/CTE/W/171, 20 October 2000.Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on Trade and Environment – Internationally Agreed Definitions of Environmental Labelling within the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) and Related Work – Communication from the ISO, WT/CTE/W/114, 31 May 1999.Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on Trade and Environment – Report of the Meeting Held on 24–25 November 1997 – Note by the Secretariat, WT/CTE/M/16, 19 December 1997.Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on Trade and Environment – Report of the Meeting Held on 30 June 2014 – Note by the Secretariat, WT/CTE/M/57, 30 September 2014.Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on Trade and Environment – Report of the Meeting Held on 29 September 2010 – Note by the Secretariat, WT/CTE/M/50, 2 November 2010.Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on Trade and Environment – Report of the Meeting Held on 14 November 2011 – Note by the Secretariat, WT/CTE/M/53, 27 January 2012.Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on Trade and Environment – Report of the Meeting Held on 5 June 2013 – Note by the Secretariat, WT/CTE/M/55, 16 August 2013.Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on Trade and Environment – Report of the Meeting Held on 20 June 2017 – Note by the Secretariat, WT/CTE/M/63, 27 September 2017.Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on Trade and Environment – Special Session – Report by the Chairman, Ambassador Manuel A. J. Teehankee, to the Trade Negotiations Committee, TN/TE/20, 21 April 2011.Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on Trade and Environment – Special Session – Report by the Chairman, Ambassador Manuel A. J. Teehankee, to the Trade Negotiations Committee for the Purpose of the TNC Stocktaking Exercise, TN/TE/19, 22 March 2010.Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on Trade and Environment – Special Session – Statement by the Chairperson of the Special Session of the Committee on Trade and Environment to the Trade Negotiations Committee, TN/TE/2, 4 July 2002.Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on Trade and Environment – Special Session – WTO Negotiations on Environmental Goods and Services – Addressing the Development Dimension for a ‘Triple-Win’ Outcome – Communication from China and India, TN/TE/W/79, 15 April 2011.Google Scholar

WTO, Committee on Trade and Environment – Taxes and Charges for Environmental Purposes – Border Tax Adjustment – Note by the Secretariat, WT/CTE/W/47, 2 May 1997.Google Scholar

WTO, Council for Trade in Goods – Minutes of the Meeting of the Council for Trade in Goods – 7 and 8 July 2022, G/C/M/143, 6 October 2022.Google Scholar

WTO, Council for Trade in Services – Background Note on Environmental Services – Note by the Secretariat, S/C/W/320, 20 August 2010.Google Scholar

WTO, Council for Trade in Services – Energy Services – Background Note by the Secretariat, S/C/W/52, 9 September 1998.Google Scholar

WTO, Council for Trade in Services – Energy Services – Background Note by the Secretariat, S/C/W/311, 12 January 2010.Google Scholar

WTO, Council for Trade in Services – Special Session – Communication from Chile, Mexico, New Zealand and Panama – Exploratory Discussions on Market Access, JOB/SERV/282, 13 June 2018.Google Scholar

WTO, Council for Trade in Services – Special Session – Communication from Australia, Canada, the EU, the Republic of Korea, Mexico, New Zealand, Norway, Switzerland and the UK – Exploratory Discussions on Market Access: Environmental Services – Revision, JOB/SERV/299/Rev.4, 21 July 2022.Google Scholar

WTO, Council for TRIPS – Annual Report on Notifications and Other Information Flows – Note by the Secretariat – Revision, IP/C/W/687/Rev.1, 7 March 2022.Google Scholar

WTO, Council for TRIPS – Implementation of Article 66.2 of the TRIPS Agreement – Decision of the Council for TRIPS of 19 February 2003, IP/C/28, 20 February 2003.Google Scholar

WTO, Council for TRIPS – Report on the Implementation of Article 66.2 of the TRIPS Agreement – EU – Addendum, IP/C/W/656/Add.5, 6 February 2020.Google Scholar

WTO, Council for TRIPS – Report on the Implementation of Article 66.2 of the TRIPS Agreement – New Zealand – Addendum, IP/C/W/656/Add.7, 4 February 2020.Google Scholar

WTO, Council for TRIPS – Report on the Implementation of Article 66.2 of the TRIPS Agreement – Australia – Addendum, IP/C/W/656/Add.3, 10 October 2019.Google Scholar

WTO, Council for TRIPS – Report on the Implementation of Article 66.2 of the TRIPS Agreement – Canada – Addendum, IP/C/W/656/Add.4, 10 October 2019.Google Scholar

WTO, Council for TRIPS – Report on the Implementation of Article 66.2 of the TRIPS Agreement – Norway – Addendum, IP/C/W/656/Add.6, 10 October 2019.Google Scholar

WTO, Council for TRIPS – Report on the Implementation of Article 66.2 of the TRIPS Agreement – Switzerland, IP/C/W/656, 27 September 2019.Google Scholar

WTO, ‘Dispute Settlement’, www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/dispu_e.htm.Google Scholar

WTO, ‘Eliminating Trade Barriers on Environmental Goods and Services’, www.wto.org/English/tratop_e/envir_e/envir_neg_serv_e.htm.Google Scholar

WTO, ‘Environmental Database’, https://edb.wto.org.Google Scholar

WTO, ‘Environmental Goods Agreement (EGA)’, www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/envir_e/ega_e.htm.Google Scholar

WTO, ‘Environmental Services’, www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/serv_e/environment_e/environment_e.htm.Google Scholar

WTO, European Union – Certain Measures Concerning Palm Oil and Oil Palm Crop-Based Biofuels – Request for the Establishment of a Panel by Indonesia, WT/DS593/9, 24 March 2020.Google Scholar

WTO, European Union and Certain Member States – Certain Measures on the Importation and Marketing of Biodiesel and Measures Supporting the Biodiesel Industry – Request for Consultations by Argentina, WT/DS459/1, G/L/1027, G/SCM/D97/1, G/TRIMS/D/36, G/TBT/D/44, 23 May 2013.Google Scholar

WTO, European Union and Certain Member States – Certain Measures Concerning Palm Oil and Oil Palm Crop-Based Biofuels – Request for Consultations by Malaysia, WT/DS600/1, G/L/1384, G/TBT/D/54, G/SCM/D131/1, 19 January 2021.Google Scholar

WTO, ‘Exploring the Links between Subsidies, Trade and the WTO’, World Trade Report 2006, 2006.Google Scholar

WTO, ‘The Future of Services Trade’, World Trade Report 2019, 2019.Google Scholar

WTO, General Council – 28 February and 1 March 2019 – The Continued Relevance of Special and Differential Treatment in Favour of Developing Members to Promote Development and Ensure Inclusiveness – Communication from China, India, South Africa and the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, […] and Pakistan – Revision, WT/GC/W/765/Rev.2, 4 March 2019.Google Scholar

WTO, General Council – 7 May 2019 – Pursuing the Development Dimension in WTO Rule-Making Efforts – Communication from Norway; Canada; Hong Kong, China; Iceland; Mexico; New Zealand; Singapore and Switzerland – Revision, WT/GC/W/770/Rev.3, 8 May 2019.Google Scholar

WTO, General Council – 9–11 December 2019 – Draft General Council Decision – Procedures to Strengthen the Negotiating Function of the WTO – Decision of X Date – Revision, WT/GC/W/764/Rev.1, 25 November 2019.Google Scholar

WTO, General Council – Advancing Sustainability Goals through Trade Rules to Level the Playing Field – Draft Ministerial Decision, WT/GC/W/814, 17 December 2020.Google Scholar

WTO, General Council – An Undifferentiated WTO: Self-Declared Development Status Risks Institutional Irrelevance – Communication from the United States, WT/GC/W/757, 16 January 2019.Google Scholar

WTO, General Council – China’s Proposal on WTO Reform – Communication from China, WT/GC/W/773, 13 May 2019.Google Scholar

WTO, General Council – Committee on SCM – Committee on Trade and Development – A Case for Rebalancing the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (ASCM) – Policy Space to Promote Industrialisation in Developing Countries – Communication from the African Group (Angola; Benin; […]; Uganda; Zambia and Zimbabwe), WT/GC/W/880, G/SCM/W/589, WT/COMTD/W/274, 26 May 2023.Google Scholar

WTO, General Council – Council for Trade in Goods – Procedures to Enhance Transparency and Strengthen Notification Requirements under WTO Agreements – Communication from Argentina, Costa Rica, the EU, Japan, and the United States, JOB/GC/204, JOB/CTG/14, 1 November 2018.Google Scholar

WTO, General Council – Council for Trade in Goods – Procedures to Enhance Transparency and Improve Compliance with Notification Requirements under WTO Agreements – Communication from Albania; Argentina; Australia; Brazil; Canada; Chile; Colombia; Costa Rica; the EU; […]; and Uruguay – Revision, JOB/GC/204/Rev.12, JOB/CTG/14/Rev.12, 2 November 2022.Google Scholar

WTO, General Council – Improving the Operation of WTO Bodies to Revitalise the WTO’s Monitoring and Deliberative Function – Communication from Australia; Brunei Darussalam; Canada; Chile; Costa Rica; Guatemala; Iceland; Israel; Japan; Republic of Korea; New Zealand; […]; and the UK, WT/GC/W/877, 4 May 2023.Google Scholar

WTO, General Council – Ministerial Statement on Fossil Fuel Subsidies – Revision, WT/MIN(21)/9/Rev.2, 10 June 2022.Google Scholar

WTO, General Council – Minutes of the Meeting – Held in the Centre William Rappard and in Virtual Format on 25–26 July 2022, WT/GC/M/200, 21 October 2022.Google Scholar

WTO, General Council – Reinforcing the Deliberative Function of the WTO to Respond to Global Trade Policy Challenges – Communication from the EU, WT/GC/W/864, 22 February 2023.Google Scholar

WTO, General Council – Strengthening and Modernizing the WTO: Discussion Paper – Communication from Canada, JOB/GC/201, 24 September 2018.Google Scholar

WTO, General Council – Waivers – 1995–2020 – Note by the Secretariat – Revision, WT/GC/W/718/Rev.1, 25 January 2021.Google Scholar

WTO, General Council – Waivers – 2021 – Note by the Secretariat, WT/GC/W/840, 17 December 2021.Google Scholar

WTO, General Council – WTO Reform: Incremental Changes to Improve the Functioning of the Various WTO Bodies – Communication from India, WT/GC/W/874, 1 May 2023.Google Scholar

WTO, Guide to GATT Law and Practice (Geneva: WTO, 1995), Analytical Index, Vol. 1.Google Scholar

WTO, ‘Investment Facilitation for Development in the WTO’, January 2023, www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/invfac_public_e/factsheet_ifd.pdf.Google Scholar

WTO, ‘Lamy Calls for Dialogue on Trade and Energy in the WTO’, 29 April 2013, www.wto.org/english/news_e/sppl_e/sppl279_e.htm.Google Scholar

WTO, Ministerial Conference – [Twelfth Session – Geneva, 30 November – 3 December 2021] – TESSD – Ministerial Statement on Trade and Environmental Sustainability – Revision, WT/MIN(21)/6/Rev.2, 14 December 2021.Google Scholar

WTO, Ministerial Conference – [Twelfth Session – Geneva, 30 November – 3 December 2021] – Informal Dialogue on Plastic Pollution and Environmentally Sustainable Plastics Trade (IDP) – MC12 Ministerial Statement on Plastic Pollution and Environmentally Sustainable Plastics Trade – Revision, WT/MIN(21)/8/Rev.2, 10 December 2021.Google Scholar

WTO, Ministerial Conference – Tenth Session – Nairobi, 15–18 December 2015 – Ministerial Declaration on the Expansion of Trade in Information Technology Products – Nairobi, 16 December 2015, WT/MIN(15)/25, 16 December 2015.Google Scholar

WTO, Ministerial Conference – Twelfth Session – Geneva, 12–15 June 2022 – Ministerial Decision on the TRIPS Agreement – Adopted on 17 June 2022, WT/MIN(22)/30, WT/L/1141, 22 June 2022.Google Scholar

WTO, Ministerial Conference, Singapore – Ministerial Declaration on Trade in Information Technology Products – Singapore, 13 December 1996, WT/MIN(96)/16, 13 December 1996.Google Scholar

WTO, Negotiating Group on Rules – Report by the Chairman, H. E. Mr Wayne McCook to the Trade Negotiations Committee, TN/RL/28, 29 November 2017.Google Scholar

WTO, ‘Negotiations on Trade and the Environment’, www.wto.org/English/tratop_e/envir_e/envir_negotiations_e.htm.Google Scholar

WTO, Report (1996) of the Committee on Trade and Environment, WT/CTE/1, 12 November 1996.Google Scholar

WTO, Report (2008) of the Working Group on Trade and Transfer of Technology to the General Council, WT/WGTTT/10, 11 December 2008.Google Scholar

WTO, ‘SPS & TBT Platform’, https://eping.wto.org.Google Scholar

WTO, Structured Discussions on Investment Facilitation – Communication from Brazil, INF/IFD/W/1, 26 March 2019.Google Scholar

WTO, ‘Subsidies Committee Members Again Cite Concerns on Lack of Transparency’, 30 April 2019, www.wto.org/english/news_e/news19_e/scm_30apr19_e.htm.Google Scholar

WTO, ‘Trade and Environmental Sustainability Structured Discussion: An Overview in Three Pages’, www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/tessd_e/tessd_overview_in_three_pages.pdf.Google Scholar

WTO, ‘Trade in Natural Resources’, World Trade Report 2010, 2010.Google Scholar

WTO, ‘Trade in Services: The Most Dynamic Segment of International Trade’, 2015, www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/20y_e/services_brochure2015_e.pdf.Google Scholar

WTO, TPRB – Trade Policy Review – Report by the Secretariat – Australia – Revision, WT/TPR/S/396/Rev.1, 29 July 2020.Google Scholar

WTO, TPRB – Trade Policy Review – Report by the Secretariat – Bangladesh – Revision, WT/TPR/S/385/Rev.1, 21 May 2019.Google Scholar

WTO, TPRB – Trade Policy Review – Report by the Secretariat – China – Revision, WT/TPR/S/375/Rev.1, 14 September 2018.Google Scholar

WTO, TPRB – Trade Policy Review – Report by the Secretariat – Georgia – Revision, WT/TPR/S/328/Rev.1, 18 March 2016.Google Scholar

WTO, TPRB – Trade Policy Review – Report by the Secretariat – Indonesia – Revision, WT/TPR/S/401/Rev.1, 5 February 2021.Google Scholar

WTO, TPRB – Trade Policy Review – Report by the Secretariat – The State of Kuwait – Revision, WT/TPR/S/258/Rev.1, 28 February 2012.Google Scholar

WTO, Trade and Environmental Sustainability Structured Discussions – Meeting Held on 19 and 20 July 2022 – Informal Summary by the Coordinators, INF/TE/SSD/R/12, 20 September 2022.Google Scholar

WTO, Trade and Environmental Sustainability Structured Discussions (TESSD) – Experiences in the Promotion and Facilitation of Environmental Goods and Services – Note by the Secretariat, INF/TE/SSD/W/18, 23 March 2022.Google Scholar

WTO, Trade in Services – Lao PDR – Schedule of Specific Commitments, GATS/SC/150, 22 April 2013.Google Scholar

WTO, Working Group on the Relationship between Trade and Investment – Communication from UNCTAD – The Draft United Nations Code of Conduct on Transnational Corporations and the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, WT/WGTI/W/52, 21 August 1998.Google Scholar

WTO, Working Group on Trade and Transfer of Technology – A Taxonomy on Country Experiences on International Technology Transfers – Note by the Secretariat, WT/WGTTT/W/3, 11 November 2002.Google Scholar

WTO, Working Group on Trade and Transfer of Technology – Provisions Relating to Transfer of Technology in WTO Agreements – Communication from Cuba, Egypt, Honduras, India, Indonesia, Jamaica, Kenya, Mauritius, Pakistan and Zimbabwe – Revision, WT/WGTTT/3/Rev.1, 21 October 2002.Google Scholar

WTO, Working Group on Trade and Transfer of Technology – Report 2021 of the Working Group on Trade and Transfer of Technology to the General Council, WT/WGTTT/23, 5 November 2021.Google Scholar

WTO, Working Party on Domestic Regulation – Communication from Switzerland – Proposal for Disciplines on Technical Standards in Services, S/WPDR/W/32/Rev.1, 28 October 2005.Google Scholar

WTO, Working Party on Domestic Regulation – Disciplines on Domestic Regulation Pursuant to GATS Article VI:4 – Chairman’s Progress Report, S/WPDR/W/45, 14 April 2011.Google Scholar

WTO, Working Party on Domestic Regulation – Technical Standards in Services – Note by the Secretariat, S/WPDR/W/49, 13 September 2012.Google Scholar

WTO, Working Party on Professional Services – The Relevance of the Disciplines of the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) and on Import Licensing Procedures to Article VI.4 of the General Agreement on Trade in Services – Note by the Secretariat, S/WPPS/W/9, 11 September 1996.Google Scholar

WTO, ‘WTO Members Engage in Exploratory Talks on Market Access for Environmental Services’, 30 September 2019, www.wto.org/english/news_e/news19_e/serv_30sep19_e.htm.Google Scholar

Yada, Jurei et al., ‘Harmonization of Product Energy Efficiency Standards and Free Trade Agreements: The Role of International Cooperation’, European Council for an Energy Efficient Economy, Summer Study Proceedings, 2017, www.eceee.org/library/conference_proceedings/eceee_Summer_Studies/2017/2-policy-governance-design-implementation-and-evaluation-challenges/harmonization-of-product-energy-efficiency-standards-and-free-trade-agreements-the-role-of-international-cooperation/.Google Scholar

Yamaguchi, Shunta, ‘Greening Regional Trade Agreements on Investment’, OECD Trade and Environment Working Paper No. 2020/03, 2020.Google Scholar

Yu, Dayong, ‘The Harmonized System – Amendments and Their Impact on WTO Members’ Schedules’, WTO Staff Working Paper No. ERSD-2008-02, 2008.Google Scholar

Zachmann, Georg and McWilliams, Ben, ‘A European Carbon Border Tax: Much Pain, Little Gain’, Policy Contribution No. 5, Bruegel, 2020.Google Scholar

Zee, Eva van der, ‘Disciplining Private Standards under the SPS and TBT Agreement: A Plea for Market-State Procedural Guidelines’, 52 Journal of World Trade 393 (2018).Google Scholar

Zhu, Ying, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility and International Investment Law: Tension and Reconciliation’, 2017 Nordic Journal of Commercial Law 90 (2017).Google Scholar

Zhuang, Wei, Intellectual Property Rights and Climate Change: Interpreting the TRIPS Agreement for Environmentally Sound Technologies (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar