Book contents
- Empirical BioethicsTheoretical and Practical Perspectives
- Cambridge Bioethics and Law
- Empirical Bioethics
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- Part I Theoretical Perspectives
- Part II Practical Perspectives
- 8 Practical Perspectives: An Introduction
- 9 Moral Improvement through Interactive Research: A Practice Example of Dialogical Empirical Bioethics
- 10 Reflective Equilibrium as a Normative Empirical Model: The Case of Ashley X
- 11 Theory and Practice of Democratic Deliberation in Bioethics Research
- 12 Feminist Empirical Bioethics
- 13 Lessons from Experience: Establishing and Running Interdisciplinary Mixed-Method Bioethics Research
- 14 Publishing Research in Empirical Bioethics: Quality, Disciplines and Expertise
- Index
- Books in the series
- References
13 - Lessons from Experience: Establishing and Running Interdisciplinary Mixed-Method Bioethics Research
from Part II - Practical Perspectives
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 February 2017
Book contents
- Empirical BioethicsTheoretical and Practical Perspectives
- Cambridge Bioethics and Law
- Empirical Bioethics
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- Part I Theoretical Perspectives
- Part II Practical Perspectives
- 8 Practical Perspectives: An Introduction
- 9 Moral Improvement through Interactive Research: A Practice Example of Dialogical Empirical Bioethics
- 10 Reflective Equilibrium as a Normative Empirical Model: The Case of Ashley X
- 11 Theory and Practice of Democratic Deliberation in Bioethics Research
- 12 Feminist Empirical Bioethics
- 13 Lessons from Experience: Establishing and Running Interdisciplinary Mixed-Method Bioethics Research
- 14 Publishing Research in Empirical Bioethics: Quality, Disciplines and Expertise
- Index
- Books in the series
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Empirical BioethicsTheoretical and Practical Perspectives, pp. 222 - 234Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2016
References
Alderson, P., Farsides, B., Williams, C. 2002. Examing Ethics in Practice: Health Service Professionals’ Evaluations of In-Hospital Ethics Seminars. Nursing Ethics. 9:508–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brosnan, C., Cribb, A, Williams, C., Wainwright, S. 2013. Neuroscientists’ Everyday Experiences of Ethics: The Interplay of Regulatory, Professional, Personal and Tangible Ethical Spheres. Sociology of Health and Illness. 35:1133–1148.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ehrich, K., Farsides, B., Williams, C., Scott, R. 2011. Constructing an Ethical framework for Embryo Donation to Research: Is It Time for a Restricted Consent Policy? Human Fertility. 14:115–121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farsides, B., Williams, C., Alderson, P. 2004. Aiming towards ‘Moral Equilibrium’: Health Care Professionals’ Views on Working within the Morally Contested Field of Antenatal Screening. Journal of Medical Ethics. 30:505–509.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Franklin, S. 2013. Biological Relatives: IVF, Stem Cells and the Future of Kinship. London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Landeweer, E., Molewijk, B., Widdershoven, G. 2016. Moral Improvement through Interactive Research: A Practice Example of Dialogical Empirical Ethics. This volume.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickerskill, M. 2013. From ‘Implications’ to ‘Dimensions’: Science, Medicine and Ethics in Society. Health Care Analysis. 13:31–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, R., Williams, C., Ehrich, K., Farsides, B. 2012. Donation of ‘Spare’ Fresh or Frozen Embryos to Research: Who Decides that an Embryo Is ‘Spare’ and How Can We Enhance the Quality and Protect the Validity of Consent? Medical Law Review. 20:255–303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wainwright, S., Williams, C., Michael, M., Farsides, B., Cribb, A. 2006. Ethical Boundary Work in the Embryonic Stem Cell Laboratory. Sociology of Health and Illness. 28:732–748.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, C., Alderson, P., Farsides, B. 2005. Multidisciplinary Research: Culture Clash or the Best of All Worlds? In Reflecting upon Research: The Perils, Pitfalls and Pleasures of Doing Social Science, Hallowell, N., Lawson, J., Gregory, S. (eds.). London: Open University Press. 91–94.Google Scholar
Williams, C., Wainwright, S. 2013. Bioethics. In Key Concepts in Medical Sociology, Gabe, J., Monaghan, L. (eds.). London: Sage. 140–143.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by