Book contents
- Emperors and Political Culture in Cassius Dio’s Roman History
- Emperors and Political Culture in Cassius Dio’s Roman History
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Contributors
- Preface
- Abbreviations
- Introduction Cassius Dio
- I Imperial and Political Narratives
- II Emperors and Biographies
- III Political Groups and Political Culture
- IV Reception and Reflection
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 July 2021
Book contents
- Emperors and Political Culture in Cassius Dio’s Roman History
- Emperors and Political Culture in Cassius Dio’s Roman History
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Contributors
- Preface
- Abbreviations
- Introduction Cassius Dio
- I Imperial and Political Narratives
- II Emperors and Biographies
- III Political Groups and Political Culture
- IV Reception and Reflection
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Emperors and Political Culture in Cassius Dio's Roman History , pp. 321 - 350Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Aalders, G. J. D. (1986), ‘Cassius Dio and the Greek world’, Mnemosyne 39: 282–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, E. (2011), ‘Cassius Dio’s Livia and the conspiracy of Cinna Magnus’, GRBS 51: 133–54.Google Scholar
Adler, E. (2012), ‘Cassius Dio’s Agrippa-Maecenas debate: an operational code analysis,’ AJPh 133: 477–520.Google Scholar
Adler, M. (1909), ‘Zur Verschwörung des Cn. Cornelius Cinna bei Seneca und Cassius Dio’, Zeitschr. österr. Gymnasien 60: 193–208.Google Scholar
Alcock, S. E. (1994), ‘Nero at play? The emperor’s Grecian Odyssey’, in Elsner, J. and Masters, J. (eds.), Reflections of Nero: Culture, History, and Representation. London: 98–111.Google Scholar
Alexander, P. J. (ed. Abrahamse, D. de F.) (1985), The Byzantine Apocalyptic Tradition. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Alföldy, G. (2001), ‘Pietas immobilis erga principem und ihr Lohn: Öffentliche Ehrenmonumente von Senatoren in Rom während der Frühen und Hohen Kaiserzeit’, in Alföldy, G. and Panciera, S. (eds.), Inschriftliche Denkmäler als Medien der Selbstdarstellung in der römischen Welt. Stuttgart: 11–46.Google Scholar
Almond, G. (1956), ‘Comparative political systems’, The Journal of Politics 18: 391–409.Google Scholar
Alt, K. (2006), ‘Der Daimon als Seelenführer: zur Vorstellung des persönlichen Schutzgeistes bei den Griechen’, Hypoboreus 6: 219–51.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. G. C. (1934), ‘The eastern frontier under Augustus’, in Cook, S. A., Adcock, F. E., and Charlesworth, M. P. (eds.), The Cambridge Ancient History. First Edition. Volume X: The Augustan Empire 44 BC–AD 70. Cambridge: 239–83.Google Scholar
Ando, C. (2016), ‘Cassius Dio on imperial legitimacy, from the Antonines to the Severans’, in Fromentin, V. et al. (eds.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. Bordeaux: 567–77.Google Scholar
Appelbaum, A. (2007), ‘Another look at the assassination of Pertinax and the accession of Julianus’, CPh 102: 198–207.Google Scholar
Ash, R. (2007), ‘The wonderful world of Mucianus’, in Bispham, E. and Rowe, G. (eds.), Vita Vigilia Est: Essays in Honour of Barbara Levick. London: 1–17.Google Scholar
Ash, R. (2016), ‘Never say die! Assassinating emperors in Suetonius’ Lives of the Caesars’, in De Temmerman, K. and Demoen, K. (eds.), Writing Biography in Greece and Rome: Narrative Technique and Fictionalization. Cambridge: 200–16.Google Scholar
Ash, R. (2018a), ‘Paradoxography and marvels in post-Domitianic Literature: “An extraordinary affair, even in the hearing!”’, in König, A. and Whitton, C. (eds.), Roman Literature under Nerva, Trajan, and Hadrian: Literary Interactions AD 96–138. Cambridge: 126–45.Google Scholar
Asirvatham, S. R. (2017), ‘Historiography’, in Richter, D. S. and Johnson, W. A. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Second Sophistic. Oxford: 477–92.Google Scholar
Assmann, J. (2011), Cultural Memory and Early Civilization. Writing, Remembrance, and Political Imagination. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Baar, M. (1990), Das Bild des Kaisers Tiberius bei Tacitus, Sueton und Cassius Dio. Stuttgart.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, B. (1986), ‘Historiography in the second century: Precursors of Dio Cassius’, Klio 68: 479–86.Google Scholar
Banchich, T. M. (ed.) (2015), The Lost History of Peter the Patrician. London and New York.Google Scholar
Banchich, T. M. and Lane, E. N. (eds.) (2009), The History of Zonaras. From Alexander Severus to the Death of Theodosius the Great. London and New York.Google Scholar
Barker, E. (1957), Social and Political Thought in Byzantium: From Justinian to the Last Palaeologus. Oxford.Google Scholar
Barnes, T. D. (1984), ‘The composition of Cassius Dio’s Roman History’, Phoenix 38: 240–55.Google Scholar
Baron, C. (2019), ‘Wrinkles in time: chronological ruptures in Cassius Dio’s narrative of the late Republic’, in Osgood, J. and Baron, C. (eds.), Cassius Dio and the Late Roman Republic. Leiden and Boston: 50–71.Google Scholar
Barton, T. (1994), ‘The inventio of Nero: Suetonius’, in Elsner, J. and Masters, J. (eds.), Reflections of Nero: Culture, History, and Representation. London: 48–63.Google Scholar
Bartsch, S. (1994), Actors in the Audience: Theatricality and Doublespeak from Nero to Hadrian. Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beagon, M. (2005), The Elder Pliny on the Human Animal: Natural History Book 7. Oxford.Google Scholar
Bellissime, M. (2016a), ‘Fiction et rhétorique dans les prosopopées de l’Histoire romaine: les marges de liberté de l’historien’, in Fromentin, V. et al. (eds.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. Bordeaux: 363–77.Google Scholar
Bellissime, M. (2016b), ‘Polysémie, contextualisation, re-sémantisation: à propos de μοναρχία et de δημοκρατία’, in Fromentin, V. et al. (eds.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. Bordeaux: 529–41.Google Scholar
Bellissime, M. and Berbessou-Broustet, B. (2016), ‘L’Histoire romaine de Zonaras’, in Fromentin, V. et al. (eds.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. Bordeaux: 95–108.Google Scholar
Bellissime, M. and Hurlet, F. (eds.) (2018), Dion Cassius. Histoire Romaine. Livre 53. Texte établi par M. B., traduit et commenté par M. B. et F. H. Paris.Google Scholar
Bender, F. S. G. (ed.) (1961), Historical Commentary on Cassius Dio 54. PhD thesis, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Beneker, J. (2011), ‘The crossing of the Rubicon and the outbreak of civil war in Cicero, Lucan, Plutarch, and Suetonius’, Phoenix 65: 74–99.Google Scholar
Berbessou-Broustet, B. (2016), ‘Xiphilin, abréviateur de Cassius Dion’, in Fromentin, V. et al. (eds.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. Bordeaux: 81–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berrendonner, C. (2005), ‘Les interventions du peuple dans les cités d’Étrurie et d’Ombrie à l’époque impériale,’ MEFRA 117: 517–39.Google Scholar
Berti, N. (1988), La guerra di Cesare contro Pompeo. Commento storico a Cassio Dione libro XLI. Milan.Google Scholar
Bertrand, E. (2016a), ‘L’empire de Cassius Dion: géographie et imperium Romanum dans l’Histoire romaine’, in Fromentin, V. et al. (eds.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. Bordeaux: 701–24.Google Scholar
Bertrand, E. (2016b), ‘Point de vue de Cassius Dion sur l’impérialisme romain’, in Fromentin, V. et al. (eds.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. Bordeaux: 675–99.Google Scholar
Bertrand, E. (2019), ‘Imperialism and the crisis of the Roman Republic: Dio’s view on late Republican conquests (Books 36-40)’, in Osgood, J. and Baron, C. (eds.), Cassius Dio and the Late Roman Republic. Leiden and Boston: 19–35.Google Scholar
Bethe, E. (ed.) (1900), Pollucis Onomasticon e codicibus ab ipso collatis denuo edidit et adnotavit. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Bialy, K. (2017), ‘John Xiphilinos on the civil war between Pompey and Caesar in the Epitome of the Roman History of Cassius Dio,’ in Słapek, D. and Łuć, I. (eds.), Przemoc w świecie starożytnym. Źródła – struktura – interpretacje. Lublin: 437–49.Google Scholar
Bingham, S. and Imrie, A. (2015), ‘The prefect and the plot: a reassessment of the murder of Plautianus’ JAH 3: 76–91.Google Scholar
Bittarello, M. B. (2011), ‘Otho, Elagabalus and the judgement of Paris: the literary construction of the unmanly emperor’, DHA 37: 93–113.Google Scholar
Bleicken, J. (1962), ‘Der politische Standpunkt Dios gegenüber der Monarchie’, Hermes 90: 444–53.Google Scholar
Blockley, R. (ed.) (1983), The Fragmentary Classicizing Historians of the Later Roman Empire. Eunapius, Olympiodorus, Priscus, and Malchus. Vol. II: Text, Translation, and Commentary. Leeds.Google Scholar
Boissevain, U. P. (ed.) (1895–1901), Cassii Dionis Cocceiani Historiarum Romanarum quae supersunt, 5 vols. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Boschung, D. (2017), ‘Jenseits des Narrativs? Kaiserporträt und Staatsrelief in der Zeit des Antoninus Pius’, in Michels, C. and Mittag, P. F. (eds.), Jenseits des Narrativs: Antoninus Pius in den nicht-literarischen Quellen. Stuttgart: 53–63.Google Scholar
Bowersock, G. M. (1998), ‘Vita Caesarum: remembering and forgetting the past’, in Ehlers, W.-W. (eds.), La biographie antique. Geneva: 193–210.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. (1978), ‘Apollonius of Tyana: tradition and reality’, ANRW 2.16.2: 1652–99.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. (2015), ‘Teachers and students in Roman Athens’, in Ash, R., Mossman, J., and Titchener, F. B. (eds.), Fame and Infamy: Essays for Christopher Pelling on Characterization in Greek and Roman Biography and Historiography. Oxford: 239–53.Google Scholar
Briquel, D. (2016), ‘Origines et période royale’, in Fromentin, V. et al. (eds.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. Bordeaux: 125–41.Google Scholar
Brizzi, G. (2016), ‘Cassio Dione e le campagne d’Oriente’, in Fromentin, V. et al. (eds.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. Bordeaux: 741–71.Google Scholar
Brunt, P. A. (1963), ‘Review of H. D. Meyer: Die Außenpolitik des Augustus und die augusteische Dichtung’, JRS 53: 170–6.Google Scholar
Brunt, P. A. and Moore, J. M. (1973), Res Gestae Divi Augusti: The Achievements of the Divine Augustus. Oxford.Google Scholar
Budelmann, F. (2002), ‘Classical commentary in Byzantium: John Tzetzes on ancient Greek literature’, in Gibson, R. K. and Kraus, C. S. (eds.), The Classical Commentary: Histories, Practices, Theory. Leiden and Boston: 141–69.Google Scholar
Buraselis, K. (2007), Θεῖα δωρεά: das göttlich-kaiserliche Geschenk: Studien zur Politik der Severer und zur Constitutio Antoniniana, Vienna. (Translation of Theia Dorea: Meletes pano sten politike tes dynasteias ton Severon kai ten Constitutio Antoniniana, Athens, 1989.)Google Scholar
Burden-Strevens, C. (2015a), Cassius Dio’s Speeches and the Collapse of the Roman Republic. PhD thesis, University of Glasgow.Google Scholar
Burden-Strevens, C. (2015b), ‘Ein völlig romanisierter Mann’? Identity, identification, and integration in the Roman History of Cassius Dio and in Arrian’, in Roselaar, S. T. (ed.), Processes of Cultural Change and Integration in the Roman World. Leiden and Boston: 287–306.Google Scholar
Burden-Strevens, C. (2016), ‘Fictitious speeches, envy, and the habituation of authority: writing the collapse of the Roman Republic’, in Lange, C. H. and Madsen, J. M. (eds.), Cassius Dio. Greek Intellectual and Roman Politician. Leiden and Boston: 193–216.Google Scholar
Burden-Strevens, C. (2020), Cassius Dio’s Speeches and the Collapse of the Roman Republic. Leiden and Boston.Google Scholar
Burden-Strevens, C. and Lindholmer, M. (eds.) (2019), Cassius Dio’s Forgotten History of Early Rome. Leiden and Boston.Google Scholar
Burton, G. P. (1979), ‘The curator rei publicae: towards a reappraisal’, Chiron 9: 465–87.Google Scholar
Büttner-Wobst, T. (1890), ‘Die Abhängigkeit des geschichtsschreibers Zonaras von den erhaltenen Quellen’, in Fleckeisen, A. (ed.), Commentationes Fleckeisenianae. Leipzig: 121–70.Google Scholar
Campbell, J. B. (2005), ‘The Severan dynasty’, in Bowman, A. K., Garnsey, P. and Cameron, A. (eds.), The Cambridge Ancient History. Second Edition. Volume XII: The Crisis of Empire, AD 193–337. Cambridge: 1–27.Google Scholar
Carlsen, J. (2016), ‘Alexander the Great in Cassius Dio’, in Lange, C. H. and Madsen, J. M. (eds.), Cassius Dio. Greek Intellectual and Roman Politician. Leiden and Boston: 316–31.Google Scholar
Carroll, K. K. (1982), The Parthenon Inscription. Greek, Roman and Byzantine Monographs 9. Durham, NC.Google Scholar
Carsana, C. (2000), ‘Considerazioni sulla fondazione di Lione alla luce di una rilettura dell’epistolario ciceroniano’, Athenaeum 88: 203–17.Google Scholar
Carsana, C. (2016), ‘La teoria delle forme di governo: il punto di vista di Cassio Dione sui poteri di Cesare’, in Fromentin, V. et al. (eds.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. Bordeaux: 545–58.Google Scholar
Cary, E. (ed.) (1914–27), Dio’s Roman History (‘on the basis of the version of Herbert Baldwin Foster, Ph.D.’), 9 vols. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Charles, M. B. and Anagnostou-Laoutides, E. (2010), ‘The sexual hypocrisy of Domitian: Suet., Dom. 8.3’, AC 79: 173–87.Google Scholar
Charles, M. B. and Anagnostou-Laoutides, E. (2013–2014), ‘Unmanning an emperor: Otho in the literary tradition’, CJ 109: 199–222.Google Scholar
Chenault, R. (2012), ‘Statues of senators in the Forum of Trajan and the Roman Forum in Late Antiquity’, JRS 102: 103–32.Google Scholar
Chew, K. (2011), ‘Eyeing epiphanies in Greek, Latin, and Sanskrit Texts’, Phoenix 65: 207–37.Google Scholar
Christol, M. (2016), ‘Marius Maximus, Cassius Dio, et Ulpien: destins croisés et débats politiques’, in Fromentin, V. et al. (eds.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. Bordeaux: 431–46.Google Scholar
Clauss, M. (1999), Kaiser und Gott. Herrscherkult im römischen Reich. Stuttgart and Leipzig.Google Scholar
Coarelli, F. (1996), ‘Fregellae, Arpinum, Aquinum: lana e fullonica nel Lazio meridionale’, in Cébeillac-Gervasoni, M. (ed.), Les élites municipales de l’Italie péninsulaire des Gracques à Néron. Naples and Rome: 199–205.Google Scholar
Coast, D. (2014), News and Rumour in Jacobean England: Information, Court Politics and Diplomacy, 1618–25. Manchester.Google Scholar
Coltelloni-Trannoy, M. (2016a), ‘La politeia impériale d’après Cassius Dion (livres 52–59)’, in Fromentin, V. et al. (eds.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. Bordeaux: 559–66.Google Scholar
Coltelloni-Trannoy, M. (2016b), ‘Les temporalités du recit impérial dans l’Histoire romaine de Cassius Dion’, in Fromentin, V. et al. (eds.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. Bordeaux: 335–62.Google Scholar
Cooley, A. (ed.) (2009), Res Gestae Divi Augusti: Text, Translation and Commentary. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Cornell, T. J., Bispham, E. H., Rich, J. W., Smith, C. J. (eds.) (2013), The Fragments of the Roman Historians, 3 vols. Oxford.Google Scholar
Cortés Copete, J. M. (2016), ‘Casio Dion 68.4 y la Autobiografía de Adriano. Íber, ítalo e italiota: a la búsqueda de una identitad imperial’, Athenaeum 104: 545–66.Google Scholar
Cotton, H. M. and Yakobson, A. (2002), ‘Arcanum imperii: the powers of Augustus’, in Clark, G. and Rajak, T. (eds.), Philosophy and Power in the Graeco-Roman World: Essays in Honour of Miriam Griffin. Oxford: 193–209.Google Scholar
Coudry, M. (2016a), ‘Cassius Dio on Pompey’s extraordinary commands’, in Lange, C. H. and Madsen, J. M. (eds.), Cassius Dio. Greek Intellectual and Roman Politician. Leiden and Boston: 33–50.Google Scholar
Coudry, M. (2016b), ‘Figures et récit dans les livres républicains (livres 36 à 44)’, in Fromentin, V. et al. (eds.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. Bordeaux: 287–302.Google Scholar
Coudry, M. (2019), ‘The “great men” of the middle Republic in Cassius Dio’s Roman History’, in Burden-Strevens, C. and Lindholmer, M. (eds.), Cassius Dio’s Forgotten History of Early Rome. Leiden and Boston: 126–64.Google Scholar
Courrier, C. (2014), La plèbe de Rome et sa culture (fin du IIe siècle av. J.-C. – fin du Ier siècle ap. J.-C.). Rome.Google Scholar
Cresci Marrone, G. (1998), ‘Introduzione’, in Cresci Marrone, G., Stroppa, A., Rohr Vio, F. (eds.), Cassio Dione, Storia romana, V. Libri LII–LVI. Milan: 5–36.Google Scholar
Cresci Marrone, G., Stroppa, A. and Rohr Vio, F. (eds.) (1998), Cassio Dione, Storia romana, V. Libri LII–LVI. Milan.Google Scholar
Croke, B. (2006), ‘Tradition and originality in Photius’ historical reading’, in Burke, J. et al. (eds.), Byzantine Narrative. Papers in Honour of Roger Scott. Melbourne: 59–70.Google Scholar
Crook, J. (1955), Consilium Principis. Imperial Councils and Counsellors from Augustus to Diocletian. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Dalla Rosa, A. (2017), ‘Quando l’epigrafia è politica. A proposito dei riferimenti epigrafici nell’opera di Cassio Dione’, in Segenni, S. and Bellomo, M. (eds.), Epigrafia e politica. Il contributo della documentazione epigrafica allo studio delle dinamiche politiche nel mondo romano. Milan: 95–117.Google Scholar
Davenport, C. (2011), ‘Iterated consulships and the government of Severus Alexander’, ZPE 177: 281–88.Google Scholar
Davenport, C. (2012b), ‘The provincial appointments of the emperor Macrinus’, Antichthon 46: 184–203.Google Scholar
Davenport, C. (2014), ‘The conduct of Vitellius in Cassius Dio’s Roman History’, Historia 63: 96–116.Google Scholar
Davenport, C. (2017), ‘The sexual habits of Caracalla: rumour, gossip, and historiography’, Histos 11: 75–100.Google Scholar
Davenport, C. and Mallan, C. (2014), ‘Hadrian’s adoption speech in Cassius Dio’s Roman History and the problems of imperial succession’, AJPh 135: 637–68.Google Scholar
Davies, J. (2004), Rome’s Religious History: Livy, Tacitus, and Ammianus on their Gods. Cambridge.Google Scholar
de Blois, L. (1994), ‘Traditional virtues and new spiritual qualities in third century views of empire, emperorship and practical politics’, Mnemosyne 47: 166–76.Google Scholar
de Blois, L. (1998), ‘Emperor and empire in the works of Greek-speaking authors of the third century AD’, ANRW 2.34.4: 3391–443.Google Scholar
de Blois, L. (1998–9), ‘The perception of emperor and empire in Cassius Dio’s Roman History’, AncSoc 29: 267–81.Google Scholar
de Boor, C. et al. (eds) (1903–10), Excerpta Historica iussu imperatoris Constantini Porphyrogeniti confecta, 4 vols. Berlin.Google Scholar
de Franchis, M. (2016), ‘Tite-Live modèle de Cassius Dion ou contre-modèle?’, in Fromentin, V. et al. (eds.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. Bordeaux: 191–204.Google Scholar
Dench, E. (2013), ‘Cicero and Roman identity’, in Steel, C. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Cicero. Cambridge: 122–38.Google Scholar
Dench, E. (2018), Empire and Political Cultures in the Roman World. Key Themes in Ancient History. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Desmond, W. (2006), ‘Lessons of fear: A reading of Thucydides’, Classical Philology 101.4: 359–79.Google Scholar
Devillers, O. (2016a), ‘Cassius Dion et les sources pré-tacitéennes’, in Fromentin, V. et al. (eds.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. Bordeaux: 233–41.Google Scholar
Devillers, O. (2016b), ‘Cassius Dion et l’évolution de l’annalistique: Remarques à propos de la représentation des Julio-Claudiens dans l’Histoire romaine’, in Fromentin, V. et al. (eds.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. Bordeaux: 317–34.Google Scholar
Di Fonzo, N. and Bordia, P. (2007), Rumor Psychology. Social and Organizational Approaches. Washington.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodds, E. R. (1965), Pagan and Christian in an Age of Anxiety: Some Aspects of Religious Experience from Marcus Aurelius to Constantine. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffy, J. and Papaioannou, S. (2003), ‘Michael Psellos and the authorship of the Historia Syntomos: final considerations,’ in Abramea, A., Laiou, A., and Chrysos, E. (eds.), Byzantium, State and Society: In Memory of Nikos Oiknomides. Athens: 219–29.Google Scholar
Dželebdžić, D. (2005), ‘Η δημοκρατική Ρώμη στην πολιτική σκέψη του Μιχαήλ Ψελλού’, ZRIV 42: 23–33.Google Scholar
Eck, W. (1984), ‘Senatorial self-representation: developments in the Augustan period’, in Millar, F. and Segal, E. (eds.), Caesar Augustus: Seven Aspects. Oxford: 129–67.Google Scholar
Eck, W. (1995), ‘“Tituli honorarii”, curriculum vitae und Selbstdarstellung in der Hohen Kaiserzeit’, in Solin, H. (ed.), Acta colloquii epigraphici Latini Helsingiae 3.−6. sept. 1991 habiti. Helsinki: 211–37.Google Scholar
Eck, W. (1999), ‘Elite und Leitbilder in der römischen Kaiserzeit’, in J. Dummer and M. Vielberg (eds.), Leitbilder der Spätantike – Eliten und Leitbilder. Stuttgart: 31–55.Google Scholar
Eck, W. (2009), ‘There are no cursus honorum inscriptions: the function of the cursus honorum in epigraphic communication’, SCI 28: 79–92.Google Scholar
Eck, W. (2019), ‘At magnus Caesar, and yet! Social resistance against Augustan legislation’, in Morrell, K., Osgood, J., and Welch, K. (eds.), The Alternative Augustan Age. Oxford: 78–95.Google Scholar
Edmondson, J. (ed.) (1992), Dio. The Julio-Claudians: Selections from Books 58–63 of the Roman History of Cassius Dio. London.Google Scholar
Edwards, C. (1994), ‘Beware of imitations: theatre and the subversion of imperial identity’, in Elsner, J. and Masters, J. (eds.), Reflections of Nero: Culture, History, and Representation. London: 83–97.Google Scholar
Elsner, J. (2001), ‘Structuring “Greece”: Pausanias’ Periegesis as a literary construct’, in Alcock, S. E., Cherry, J. F., Elsner, J. (eds.), Pausanias: Travel and Memory in Roman Greece. Oxford: 3–20.Google Scholar
Fantham, E. (2013), ‘The performing prince’, in Buckley, E. and Dinter, M. (eds.), A Companion to the Neronian Age. Chichester: 17–28.Google Scholar
Fargette, S. (2007), ‘Rumeurs, propagande et opinion publique au temps de la guerre civile (1407–1420)’, Le Moyen Age 113: 309–34.Google Scholar
Faur, J. C. (1978), ‘Un discours de l’empereur Caligula au Sénat (Dion, Hist. rom. LIX,16)’, Klio 40: 439–47.Google Scholar
Feldherr, A. (2009a), ‘Delusions of grandeur: Lucretian “passages” in Livy’, in Hardie, P. R. (ed.), Paradox and the Marvellous in Augustan Literature and Culture. Oxford: 310–29.Google Scholar
Feldherr, A. (2009b), ‘The poisoned chalice: rumor and historiography in Tacitus’ account of the death of Drusus’, Materiali e discussioni per l’analisi dei testi classici 61: 175–89.Google Scholar
Ferrary, J.-L. (trans. J. Edmondson) (2009), ‘The powers of Augustus’, in Edmonsdson, J. (ed.), Augustus. Edinburgh: 90–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrary, J.-L. (2010), ‘À propos des pouvoirs et des honneurs décernés à César entre 48 et 44’, in Urso, G. (ed.), Cesare: precursore o visionario? Pisa: 9–30.Google Scholar
Fishwick, D. (1990), ‘Dio and Maecenas: the emperor and the ruler cult’, Phoenix 44: 267–75.Google Scholar
Flach, D. (1973), ‘Dios Platz in der kaiserzeitlichen Geschichtsschreibung’, A&A 18: 130–43.Google Scholar
Flower, H. (2006), The Art of Forgetting: Disgrace and Oblivion in Roman Political Culture. Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Flusin, B. (2002), ‘Les Excerpta Constantinients: logique d’une anti-histoire’, in Pittia, S. (ed.), Fragments d’historiens grecs. Autour de Denys d’Halicarnasse. Rome: 537–59.Google Scholar
Fomin, A. (2016), ‘Speeches in Cassius Dio’, in Lange, C. H. and Madsen, J. M. (eds.), Cassius Dio. Greek Intellectual and Roman Politician. Leiden and Boston: 217–37.Google Scholar
Foster, H. B. (ed.) (1874–1906), Dio’s Rome: An historical narrative originally composed in Greek during the reigns of Septimus Severus, Geta and Caracalla, Macrinus, Elagabalus and Alexander Severus, 6 vols. New York.Google Scholar
Fox, A. (1997), ‘Rumour, news and popular political opinion in Elizabethan and early Stuart England’, The Historical Journal 40: 597–620.Google Scholar
France, J. (2016), ‘Financer l’empire: Agrippa, Mécène et Cassius Dion’, in Fromentin, V. et al. (eds.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. Bordeaux: 773–85.Google Scholar
François, P. (2016), ‘Cassius Dion et la troisième décade de Tite-Live’, in Fromentin, V. et al. (eds.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. Bordeaux: 215–31.Google Scholar
Freyburger, M.-L., and Roddaz, J.-M. (eds.) (1991), Dion Cassius, Histoire romaine, Livres 50 et 51. Texte établi, traduit et annoté. Paris.Google Scholar
Freyburger-Galland, M.-L. (1997), Aspects du vocabulaire politique et institutionnel de Dion Cassius. Paris.Google Scholar
Freyburger-Galland, M-L. (2010), ‘Dion Cassius et Suetone’, in Poignault, R. (ed.), Présence du Suétone: actes du colloque tenu à Clermont-Ferrand, 25–27 novembre 2004. Clermont-Ferrand: 147–62.Google Scholar
Fromentin, V. (2013), ‘Zonaras abréviateur de Cassius Dion. À la recherche de la préface perdue de l’Histoire romaine’, Erga-Logoi 1: 23–39.Google Scholar
Fromentin, V. (2016), ‘Denys d’Halicarnasse, source et modèle de Cassius Dion?’, in Fromentin, V. et al. (eds.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. Bordeaux: 179–90.Google Scholar
Fromentin, V., Bertrand, E., Coltelloni-Trannoy, M., Molin, M., and Urso, G. (eds.) (2016a), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures, 2 vols. Bordeaux.Google Scholar
Fromentin, V., Bertrand, E., Coltelloni-Trannoy, M., Molin, M., and Urso, G. (2016b), ‘Introduction’, in V. Fromentin, et al. (eds.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. Bordeaux: 11–16.Google Scholar
Gabba, E. (1957), ‘Note sulla polemica anticiceroniana di Asinio Pollione’, RSI 69: 317–39Google Scholar
Gabba, E. (1984), ‘The historians and Augustus’, in Millar, F. and Segal, E. (eds.), Caesar Augustus: Seven Aspects. Oxford: 61–88.Google Scholar
Gavard, C. (1993), ‘Rumeur et stéréotypes à la fin du Moyen Age’, Actes des congrès de la Société des historiens médiévistes de l’enseignement supérieur public 24: 157–77.Google Scholar
Gibson, B. J. (1998), ‘Rumours as causes of events in Tacitus’, Materiali e discussioni per l’analisi dei testi classici 40: 111–29.Google Scholar
Gill, C. (1983), ‘The question of character development: Plutarch and Tacitus’, CQ 33: 468–87.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, J. (2006), Representing Agrippina: Constructions of Female Power in the Early Roman Empire. New York.Google Scholar
Giua, M. A. (1981), ‘Clemenza del sovrano e monarchia illuminata in Cassio Dione’, Athenaeum 55: 14–22.Google Scholar
Giua, M. A. (1983), ‘Augusto nel libro 56 della storia Romana di Cassio Dione’, Athenaeum 61: 439–56.Google Scholar
Giua, M. A. (1998), ‘Sul significato dei rumores nella storiografia di Tacito’, RSI 110: 38–59.Google Scholar
Gleason, M. (2011), ‘Identity theft: doubles and masquerades in Cassius Dio’s contemporary history’, Classical Antiquity 30: 33–86.Google Scholar
Goodyear, F. R. D. (ed.) (1972), The Annals of Tacitus Books 1–6, Volume I: Annals 1–1.54. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gotteland, S. (2016), ‘Ἔκφρασις and ἐνάργεια dans l’Histoire romaine: les choix de Cassius Dio’, in Fromentin, V. et al. (eds.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. Bordeaux: 379–96.Google Scholar
Gowers, E. (2005), ‘Virgil’s Sibyl and the “many mouths” cliché (Aen.6.625–7)’, CQ 55: 170–82.Google Scholar
Gowing, A. M. (2016), ‘Cassius Dio and the city of Rome,’ in Lange, C. H. and Madsen, J. M. (eds.), Cassius Dio. Greek Intellectual and Roman Politician. Leiden and Boston: 117–35.Google Scholar
Graham, A. J. (1974), ‘The limitations of prosopography in Roman imperial history (with special reference to the Severan period)’, ANRW 2.1: 136–57.Google Scholar
Griffin, M. (2000), ‘Nerva to Hadrian’, in Bowman, A. K., Garnsey, P., and Rathbone, D. (eds.), The Cambridge Ancient History. Second Edition. Volume XI: The High Empire, AD 70–192. Cambridge: 84–131.Google Scholar
Gros, E. and Boissée, V. (eds.) (1845–70), Histoire romaine de Dion Cassius, 10 vols. Paris.Google Scholar
Gruen, E. S. (1996), ‘The expansion of the empire under Augustus’, in Bowman, A. K., Champlin, E. and Lintott, A. (eds.), The Cambridge Ancient History. Second Edition. Volume X: The Augustan Empire, 43 BC–69 AD. Cambridge: 147–98.Google Scholar
Gruen, E. S. (1990), ‘The imperial policy of Augustus’, in Raaflaub, K. A. and Toher, M. (eds.), Between Republic and Empire: Interpretations of Augustus and His Principate. Berkeley: 395–416.Google Scholar
Gruen, E. S. (2005), ‘Augustus and the making of the Principate’, in Galinsky, K. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Augustus. Cambridge: 33–51.Google Scholar
Gunderson, E. (2014), ‘E.g. Augustus: exemplum in the Augustus and the Tiberius’, in Power, T. and Gibson, R. K. (eds.), Suetonius the Biographer: Studies in Roman Lives. Oxford: 130–45.Google Scholar
Gurval, R. (1997), ‘Caesar’s comet: the politics and poetics of an Augustan myth’, MAAR 42: 39–71.Google Scholar
Gwyn, W. B. (1991), ‘Cruel Nero: The concept of the tyrant and the image of Nero in western political thought’, History of Political Thought 12.3: 421–55.Google Scholar
Hagendahl, H. (1944), ‘The mutiny of Vesontio. A problem of tendency and credibility in Caesar’s Gallic war’, C&M 6: 1–40.Google Scholar
Hägg, T. and Rousseau, P. (2000), ‘Introduction: biography and panegyric’, in Hägg, T. and Rousseau, P. (eds.), Greek Biography and Panegyric in Late Antiquity. Berkeley: 1–28.Google Scholar
Halliwell, S. (1990), ‘Traditional Greek conceptions of character’, in Pelling, C. B. R. (ed.), Characterisation and Individuality in Greek Literature. Oxford: 32–59.Google Scholar
Hammond, M. (1932), ‘The significance of the speech of Maecenas in Dio Cassius, Book LII’, TAPA 63: 88–102.Google Scholar
Hammond, M. (1957), ‘Imperial elements in the formula of the Roman emperors during the first two and a half centuries of the empire’, MAAR 25: 19–64.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. R. (2012), Rumour and Renown: Representations of Fama in Western Literature. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Harker, A. (2008), Loyalty and Dissidence in Roman Egypt. The Case of the Acta Alexandrinorum. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Harrington, D. (1977), ‘Cassius Dio as a military historian’, Acta Classica 20: 159–65.Google Scholar
Harte, V. and Lane, M. (eds.) (2013), Politeia in Greek and Roman Philosophy. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hawkins, T. (2017), ‘Pollio’s paradox: popular invective and the transition to empire’, in Grig, L. (ed.), Popular Culture in the Ancient World. Cambridge: 129–48.Google Scholar
Hekster, O. (2010), ‘Reversed epiphanies: Roman emperors deserted by gods’, Mnemosyne 63: 601–15.Google Scholar
Hekster, O., Claes, L., Manders, E., Slootjes, D., Klaassen, Y., and de Haan, N. (2014), ‘Nero’s ancestry and the construction of imperial ideology in the early empire. A methodological case study’, Journal of Ancient History and Archaeology 1: 7–27.Google Scholar
Hidber, T. (2004), ‘Cassius Dio’, in de Jong, I. J. F., Nünlist, R., and Bowie, A. (eds.), Narrators, Narratees, and Narratives in Ancient Greek Literature. Studies in Ancient Greek Narrative, Volume I. Leiden and Boston: 187–99.Google Scholar
Hillard, T. W. (2011), ‘Velleius 2.124.2 and the reluctant princeps: the evolution of Roman perceptions of leadership’, in Cowan, E. (ed.), Velleius Paterculus: Making History. Swansea: 219–51.Google Scholar
Hölscher, T. (2003), ‘Images of war in Greece and Rome: between military practice, public memory, and cultural symbolism’, JRS 93: 1–17.Google Scholar
Hose, M. (1994), Erneuerung der Vergangenheit: Die Historiker im Imperium Romanum von Florus bis Cassius Dio. Stuttgart and Leipzig.Google Scholar
Hose, M. (2007), ‘Cassius Dio: a senator and historian in the age of anxiety’, in Marincola, J. (ed.), A Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography. Malden, MA: 461–67.Google Scholar
Hose, M. (2011), ‘Der Kaiser und seine Begrenzung durch die antike Literature: Betrachtungen zu Cassius Dio’, in Winterling, A. (ed.), Zwischen Strukturgeschichte und Biographie: Probleme und Perspektiven einer neuen Römischen Kaisergeschichte 31 v. Chr.–192 n. Chr. Munich: 113–24.Google Scholar
Hug, T. B. (2009), ‘Outwitting power: bogus kings and officials in early modern England’, in Kümin, B. (ed.), Political Space in Pre-industrial Europe. Farnham: 215–30.Google Scholar
Humble, N. (2013), ‘Imitation as commentary? Plutarch and Byzantine historiography in the tenth century’, in Pace, G. and Volpe Cacciatore, P. (ed.), Gli Scritti di Plutarco: tradizione, traduzione, ricezione, commento. Naples: 219–25.Google Scholar
Humble, N. (forthcoming) ‘Plutarch in Byzantium’, in Titchener, F. and Zadorozhny, A. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Plutarch. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hunt, J. M. (2014), ‘Rumour, newsletters and the Pope’s death in early modern Rome’, in Davies, S. and Fletcher, P. (eds.), News in Early Modern Europe: Currents and Connections. Leiden: 141–58.Google Scholar
Hurley, D.W. (2014), ‘Suetonius’ rubric sandwich’, in Power, T. and Gibson, R. K. (eds.), Suetonius the Biographer: Studies in Roman Lives. Oxford: 21–37.Google Scholar
Huttner, U. (2004), Recusatio Imperii: Ein politisches Ritual zwischen Ethik und Taktik. Hildesheim.Google Scholar
Ibbetson, D. (2005), ‘High classical law’, in Bowman, A. K., Garnsey, P., and Cameron, A. (eds.), The Cambridge Ancient History. Second Edition. Volume XII: The Crisis of Empire, AD 193–337. Cambridge: 184–199.Google Scholar
Icks, M. (2008), ‘Heliogabalus, a monster on the Roman throne. The literary construction of a “bad” emperor’, in Sluiter, I. and Rosen, R. M. (eds.), Kakos: Badness and Anti-value in Classical Antiquity. Leiden: 477–88.Google Scholar
Icks, M. (2012), The Crimes of Elagabalus: The Life and Legacy of Rome’s Decadent Boy Emperor. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Icks, M. (2017), ‘Turning victory into defeat: negative assessments of imperial triumphs in Greco-Roman literature’, in Goldbeck, F. and Wienand, J. (eds.), Der römische Triumph in Prinzipat und Spätantike. Berlin: 317–33.Google Scholar
Israelowich, I. (2008), ‘The rain miracle of Marcus Aurelius: (re-)construction of consensus’, G&R 55: 83–102.Google Scholar
Jeffreys, E. (1979), ‘The attitudes of Byzantine chroniclers towards ancient history,’ Byzantion 49: 199–238.Google Scholar
Jones, B. (2016), ‘Cassius Dio – Pepaideumenos and politician on kingship’, in Lange, C. H. and Madsen, J. M. (eds.), Cassius Dio: Greek Intellectual and Roman Politician. Leiden and Boston: 297–315.Google Scholar
Juntunen, K. (2015), ‘The image of Cleopatra in Ioannes Xiphilinos’ Epitome of Cassius Dio: A reflection of the empress Eudokia Makrembolitissa?’, Acta Byzantina Fennica 4: 123–51.Google Scholar
Kaldellis, A. (2012), ‘The Byzantine role in the making of the corpus of classical Greek historiography: a preliminary investigation’, JHS 132: 71–85.Google Scholar
Kaldellis, A. (2015b), The Byzantine Republic: People and Power in New Rome. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Kaldellis, A. and Krallis, D. (eds.) (2012), The History of Michael Attaleites. Dumbarton Oaks Medieval Library. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Kampianaki, T. (2017a), John Zonaras’s Epitome of History (12th c.): A Compendium of Jewish-Roman History and Its Readers. DPhil thesis, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Kampianaki, T. (2017b), ‘Plutarch’s Lives in the Byzantine chronographic tradition: the Chronicle of John Zonaras’, BMGS 41: 15–29.Google Scholar
Kannicht, R. and Snell, B. (eds.) (1981), Tragicorum Graecorum Fragmenta. Volume II. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Kapferer, J.-N. (1990), Rumors: Uses, Interpretations, and Images. New Brunswick and London.Google Scholar
Karpozilos, A. (2009), Βυζαντινοί Ιστορικοί και Χρονογράφοι. Τόμος Γ’ (11ος – 12ος αι.). Athens.Google Scholar
Kemezis, A. (2007), ‘Augustus the ironic paradigm: Cassius Dio’s portrayal of the lex Julia and the lex Papia Poppaea’, Phoenix 61: 70–85.Google Scholar
Kemezis, A. M. (2010), ‘Lucian, Fronto, and the absence of contemporary historiography under the Antonines’, AJPh 131: 285–325.Google Scholar
Kemezis, A. M. (2012), ‘Commemoration of the Antonine aristocracy in Cassius Dio and the Historia Augusta’, CQ 62: 387–414.Google Scholar
Kemezis, A. M. (2014), Greek Narratives of the Roman Empire under the Severans: Cassius Dio, Philostratus and Herodian. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kemezis, A. M. (2016a), ‘Dio, Caesar and the Vesontio mutineers (38.34–47): a rhetoric of lies’, in Lange, C. H. and Madsen, J. M. (eds.), Cassius Dio: Greek Intellectual and Roman Politician. Leiden and Boston: 238–57.Google Scholar
Kemezis, A. M. (2016b), ‘The fall of Elagabalus as literary narrative and political reality: a reconsideration’, Historia 65: 348–90.Google Scholar
Kemezis, A. M. (2018), ‘Beyond city limits: citizenship and authorship in imperial Greek literature’, in Berthelot, K. and Price, J. J. (eds.), In the Crucible of Empire: The Impact of Roman Citizenship upon Greeks, Jews and Christians. Leuven: 73–103.Google Scholar
Kemezis, A. M. (2020), ‘The romance of Republican history: narrative tension and resolution in Florus, Appian, and Chariton’, in König, A., Langlands, R., and Uden, J. (eds.), Literature and Culture in the Roman Empire, 96–235: Cross-Cultural Interactions. Cambridge: 114–33.Google Scholar
Kierdorf, W. (1980), Laudatio Funebris: Interpretationen und Untersuchungen zur Entwicklung der römischen Leichenrede. Meisenheim am Glan.Google Scholar
Kolb, F. (1972), Literarische Beziehungen zwischen Cassius Dio, Herodian und der Historia Augusta. Bonn.Google Scholar
Konstan, D. and Walsh, R. (2016), ‘Civic and subversive biography in antiquity’, in de Temmerman, K. and Demoen, K. (eds.), Writing Biographies in Greece and Rome: Narrative Technique and Fictionalization. Cambridge: 26–43.Google Scholar
Kovács, P. (2009), Marcus Aurelius’ Rain Miracle and the Marcomannic Wars. Mnemosyne Supplement 308. Leiden.Google Scholar
Kragelund, P. (2012), ‘Tacitus, Dio, and the “sophist” Maternus’, Historia 61: 495–506.Google Scholar
Krallis, D. (2012), Michael Attaleiates and the Politics of Imperial Decline in Eleventh-Century Byzantium. Tempe.Google Scholar
Kröss, K. (2017), Die politische Rolle der stadtrömischen plebs in der Kaiserzeit. Leiden and Boston.Google Scholar
Kruse, M. (2019), ‘The epitomator Ioannes Xiphilinos and the eleventh-century Xiphilinoi’, JÖB 69: 257–74.Google Scholar
Kuhlmann, P. (2010), ‘Die Maecenas-Rede bei Cassius Dio: Anachronismen und intertextuelle Bezüge’, in Pausch, D. (ed.), Stimmen der Geschichte: Funktionen von Reden in der antiken Historiographie. Berlin and New York: 109–21.Google Scholar
Kuhn-Chen, B. (2002), Geschichtskonzeptionen griechischer Historiker im 2. und 3. Jahrhundert n.Chr. Untersuchungen zu den Werken von Appian, Cassius Dio und Herodian. Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Kühnen, A. (2008), Die Imitatio Alexandri in der römischen Politik: 1. Jh. v. Chr. – 3. Jh. n. Chr. Münster.Google Scholar
Lachenaud, G. (2016), ‘Récit et discours chez Cassius Dion: frontières, interférences et polyphonie’, in Fromentin, V. et al. (eds.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. Bordeaux: 397–414.Google Scholar
Lachenaud, G. and Coudry, M. (eds.) (2011), Dion Cassius. Histoire Romaine. Livres 38, 39 et 40. Texte établi par G.L., traduit et commenté par G. L. et M. C. Paris.Google Scholar
Laes, C. (2007), ‘School teachers in the Roman empire: a survey of the evidence’, AClass 50: 109–27.Google Scholar
Lang, D. M. (1983), ‘Iran, Armenia and Georgia’, in Yarshater, E. (ed.), The Cambridge History of Iran. Volume 3.1: The Seleucid, Parthian and Sasanian Periods. Cambridge, 505–36.Google Scholar
Lange, C. H. (2016), ‘Mock the triumph: Cassius Dio, triumph and triumph-like celebrations’, in Lange, C. H. and Madsen, J. M. (eds.), Cassius Dio. Greek Intellectual and Roman Politician. Leiden and Boston: 92–114.Google Scholar
Lange, C. H. and Madsen, J. M. (eds.) (2016), Cassius Dio. Greek Intellectual and Roman Politician. Leiden and Boston.Google Scholar
Langford, J. (2013), Maternal Megalomania: Julia Domna and the Imperial Politics of Motherhood. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Lavan, M. (2016), ‘The spread of Roman citizenship, 14–212 CE: Quantification in the face of high uncertainty’, P&P 230: 3–46.Google Scholar
Lavan, M. (2018), ‘The foundation of empire? The spread of Roman citizenship from the fourth century BCE to the third century CE’, in Berthelot, K. and Price, J. (eds.), In the Crucible of Empire: The Impact of Roman Citizenship upon Greeks, Jews and Christians. Leuven: 21–54.Google Scholar
Leidholm, N. (2018), ‘Nikephoros III Botaneiates, the Phokades, and the Fabii: embellished genealogies and contested kingship in eleventh-century Byzantium’, BMGS 42: 185–201.Google Scholar
Lemerle, P. (1971), Le premier humanisme byzantin: notes et remarques sur enseignement et culture à Byzance des origines au Xe siècle. Paris.Google Scholar
Lemerle, P. (trans. Lindsay, H. and Moffatt, A.) (1986), Byzantine Humanism: The First Phase. Notes and Remarks on Education and Culture in Byzantium from Its Origins to the 10th Century. Canberra.Google Scholar
Lendon, J. E. (1997), Empire of Honour: The Art of Government in the Roman World. Oxford.Google Scholar
Letta, C. (1979), ‘La composizione dell’opera di Cassio Dione. Cronologia e sfondo storico-politico’, in Troiani, L., Noè, E., and Letta, C. (eds.), Ricerche di storiografia greca di età romana. Pisa: 117–89.Google Scholar
Letta, C. (1994), ‘Il “Naufragio” di Caracalla in Cassio Dione, nell’Historia Augusta e nei commentary degli Arvali’, ZPE 103: 188–90.Google Scholar
Letta, C. (2003), ‘Documenti d’archivio e iscrizioni nell’opera di Cassio Dione. Un sondaggio sulla narrazione fino ad Augusto’, in Biraschi, A. M. et al. (eds.), L’uso dei documenti d’archivio nella storiografia antica. Naples: 597–622.Google Scholar
Letta, C. (2016a), ‘Fonti scritte non letterarie nella Storia Romana di Cassio Dione’, SCO 62: 245–96.Google Scholar
Letta, C. (2016b), ‘L’uso degli acta senatus nella Storia Romana di Cassio Dione’, in Fromentin, V. et al. (eds.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. Bordeaux: 243–57.Google Scholar
Letta, C. (2016c), ‘Ritorno a Cassio Dione. Caracalla e il massacro di Alessandria’, in Carsana, C. and Troiani, L L. (eds.), I percorsi di un Historikos. In memoria di Emilio Gabba. Como: 260–72.Google Scholar
Letta, C. (2019a), ‘Conoscenza e criteri di utilizzazione dei senatus consulta nella Storia Romana di Cassio Dione’, in Buongiorno, P. and Traina, G. (eds.), Rappresentazione e uso dei senatus consulta nelle fonti letterarie del principato / Darstellung und Gebrauch der senatus consulta in den literarischen Quellen der Kaiserzeit. Acta Senatus B6. Stuttgart: 189–244.Google Scholar
Letta, C., (2019b), ‘La carriera politica di Cassio Dione e la genesi della sua Storia Romana’, SCO 65: 163–80.Google Scholar
Leunclavius, I. (ed.) (1606), Ton Dionos tou Kassiou tou Kokkeianou Romaikôn Historiôn ta Heuriskomena. Dionis Cassii Cocceiani Historiae Romanae libri XLVI, partim integri, partim mutili, partim excerpti. Hannover.Google Scholar
Leunissen, P. M. (1989), Konsuln und Konsulare in der Zeit von Commodus bis Severus Alexander (180–235 n. Chr.): Prosopographische Untersuchungen zur senatorischen Elite im Römischen Kaiserreich. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Levene, D. S. (1997), ‘Pity, fear and the historical audience: Tacitus on the fall of Vitellius’, in Braund, S. M. and Gill, C. (eds.), The Passions in Roman Thought and Literature. Cambridge, 128–49.Google Scholar
Levick, B. (1972), ‘The retirement of Tiberius to Rhodes in 6 BC’, Latomus 31: 779–813.Google Scholar
Libby, B. (2010), ‘The intersection of poetic and imperial authority in Phaedrus’ Fables’, CQ 60: 545–58.Google Scholar
Liebs, D. (2012), Summoned to the Roman Courts: Famous Trials from Antiquity. Translated by R. L. R. Garber and C. G. Cürten. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Lindholmer, M. (2019), ‘Breaking the idealistic paradigm: competition in Dio’s earlier Republic’, in Burden-Strevens, C. and Lindholmer, M. (eds.) (2019), Cassius Dio’s Forgotten History of Early Rome. Leiden and Boston: 190–214.Google Scholar
Lippold, A. (1983), ‘Zur Laufbahn des P. Helvius Pertinax’, BHAC 1979–1981. Bonn: 173–91.Google Scholar
Littman, R. J. and Littman, M. L. (1973), ‘Galen and the Antonine plague’, AJP 94: 243–55.Google Scholar
Lott, J. B. (ed.) (2012), Death and Dynasty in Early Imperial Rome: Key Sources, with Text, Translation and Commentary. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Luce, T. J. (1989), ‘Ancient views on the causes of bias in historical writing’, CP 84: 16–31.Google Scholar
Maccari, A. (2015), ‘Quid sit pomerium: appunti su Gellio, Noctes Atticae XIII, 14. Le fonti e il confronto con Festo 294 L.’, SCO 61: 313–33.Google Scholar
Madsen, J. M. (2016), ‘Criticising the benefactors: the Severans and the return of dynastic rule’, in Lange, C. H. and Madsen, J. M. (eds.), Cassius Dio: Greek Intellectual and Roman Politician. Leiden and Boston: 136–58.Google Scholar
Magdalino, P. (1983), ‘Aspects of twelfth-century Byzantine Kaiserkritik,’ Speculum 58: 326–46.Google Scholar
Magdalino, P. (2013a), ‘Byzantine encyclopaedism of the ninth and tenth centuries,’ in König, J. and Woolf, G. (eds.), Encyclopaedism from Antiquity to the Renaissance. Cambridge: 219–31.Google Scholar
Magdalino, P. (2013b), ‘Knowledge and authority and authorised history: the imperial intellectual programme of Leo VI and Constantine VII,’ in Armstrong, P. (ed.), Authority in Byzantium. Farnham: 187–209.Google Scholar
Magdalino, P. and Macrides, R. (1992), ‘The fourth kingdom and the rhetoric of Hellenism’, in Magdalino, P. (ed.), The Perception of the Past in Twelfth-Century Europe. London: 117–56.Google Scholar
Mallan, C. T. (2013a), ‘Cassius Dio on Julia Domna: a study of the political and ethical functions of biographical representation in Dio’s Roman History’, Mnemosyne 66: 734–60.Google Scholar
Mallan, C. T. (2013b), ‘The style, method, and programme of Xiphilinus’ Epitome of Cassius Dio’s Roman History’, GRBS 53: 610–44.Google Scholar
Mallan, C. T. (2014), ‘The rape of Lucretia in Cassius Dio’s Roman History’, CQ 64: 758–71.Google Scholar
Mallan, C. T. (2016), ‘Parrhēsia in Cassius Dio’, in Lange, C. H. and Madsen, J. M. (eds.), Cassius Dio: Greek Intellectual and Roman Politician. Leiden and Boston: 258–75.Google Scholar
Mallan, C. T. (2017a), ‘The book indices in the manuscripts of Cassius Dio’, CQ 66: 705–23.Google Scholar
Mallan, C. T. (2017b), ‘The spectre of Alexander: Cassius Dio and the Alexander motif’, Greece and Rome 64: 132–44.Google Scholar
Mallan, C. T. (2018), ‘The historian John Zonaras: some observations on his sources and methods’, in Devillers, O. and Sebastiani, B. (eds.), Sources et modèles des historiens anciens. Bordeaux: 353–66.Google Scholar
Mallan, C. T. (2019), ‘The regal period in the Excerpta Constantiniana and the early Byzantine extracts from Dio’s Roman History’, in Burden-Strevens, C. and Lindholmer, M. O. (eds.), Cassius Dio’s Forgotten History of Early Rome. Leiden and Boston: 76–96.Google Scholar
Manders, E. and Slootjes, D. (2015), ‘Linking inscriptions to provincial coins: A reappraisal of Nero’s visit to Greece’, Latomus 74: 989–1005.Google Scholar
Manuwald, B. (1973), ‘Cassius Dio und das „Totengericht“ über Augustus bei Tacitus’, Hermes 101: 352–74.Google Scholar
Manuwald, B. (1979), Cassius Dio und Augustus. Philologische Untersuchungen zu den Büchern 45–56. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Marincola, J. (1999), ‘Genre, convention and innovation in Greco-Roman historiography’, in Kraus, C. S. (ed.), The Limits of Historiography. Leiden: 281–324.Google Scholar
Marincola, J. (2007), ‘Speeches in classical historiography’, in Maricola, J. (ed.), A Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography. Oxford and Malden, MA: 118–32.Google Scholar
Marincola, J. (2010), ‘The rhetoric of history, allusion, intertextuality, and exemplarity in historiographical speeches’, in Pausch, D. (ed.), Stimmen der Geschichte: Funktionen von Reden in der antiken Historiographie. Berlin: 259–89.Google Scholar
Markopoulos, A. (2006), ‘Roman antiquarianism: aspects of the Roman past in the middle Byzantine period,’ in Jeffreys, E. (ed.), Proceedings of the 21st International Congress of Byzantine Studies. Aldershot: 277–97.Google Scholar
Markopoulos, A. (2010), ‘From narrative historiography to historical biography: New trends in Byzantine historical writing in the 10th–11th centuries’, BZ 102: 697–715.Google Scholar
Marotta, V. (2009), La cittadinanza romana in età imperiale (secoli I-III d.C.). Turin.Google Scholar
Martini, M. (2010), ‘Il ruolo paradigmatico della figura di Marco Aurelio in Cassio Dione: confronto con la figura di Caracalla’, Sileno 36: 63–77.Google Scholar
Mazzuchi, C. M. (1979), ‘Alcune vicende della tradizione di Cassio Dione in epoca bizantina’, Aevum 53: 94–139.Google Scholar
Meckler, M. L. (1999), ‘Caracalla the intellectual’, in Dal Dovolo, E. and Rinaldi, G. (eds.), Gli Imperatori Severi: storia, archeologia, religione. Rome: 39–46.Google Scholar
Mehl, A. (1981), ‘Bemerkungen zu Dios und Tacitus Arbeitsweise und zur Quellenlage im „Totengericht“ über Augustus’, Gymnasium 88: 54–64.Google Scholar
Mendels, D. (1986), ‘Greek and Roman history in the Bibliotheca of Photius: a note,’ Byzantion 56: 196–206.Google Scholar
Mennen, I. (2011), Power and Status in the Roman Empire, AD 193–284. Leiden and Boston.Google Scholar
Meyer, H.-D. (1961), Die Außenpolitik des Augustus und die augusteische Dichtung. Cologne.Google Scholar
Michels, C. (2018), Antoninus Pius und die Rollenbilder des römischen Princeps. Berlin.Google Scholar
Migliorati, G. (2003), Cassio Dione e l’impero romano da Nerva ad Antonino Pio: alla luce dei nuovi documenti. Milan.Google Scholar
Millar, F. G. B. (2005), ‘Rome in Greek culture: Cassius Dio and Ulpian’, in Troiani, L. and Zecchini, G. (eds.), La cultura storica nei primi due secoli dell’impero romano. Rome: 17–40.Google Scholar
Millar, F. G. B. (2016), ‘Préface’, in Fromentin, V. et al. (eds.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. Bordeaux: 9–10.Google Scholar
Molin, M. (2004), ‘De l’intérêt des Excerpta historica iussu Imp. Constantini Pophyrogenitii pour le lecture de la dernière décade de Dion Cassius’, Ktema 29: 209–13.Google Scholar
Molin, M. (2006), ‘Mots, images et situations de crise dans la dernière décade de Dion Cassius d’après les Epitomai de Xiphilin’, in Quet, M.-H., Giardina, A. and Christol, M. (eds.), La “crise” de l’Empire romain de Marc Aurèle à Constantin: mutations, continuités, ruptures. Paris: 435–53.Google Scholar
Molin, M. (2016a), ‘Biographie de l’historien Cassius Dion’, in Fromentin, V. et al. (eds.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. Bordeaux: 431–46.Google Scholar
Molin, M. (2016b), ‘Cassius Dion et la société de son temps’, in Fromentin, V. et al. (eds.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. Bordeaux: 469–82.Google Scholar
Molinier-Arbo, A. (2009), ‘Dion Cassius versus Marius Maximus? Éléments de polémique entre les Romaika et l’Histoire Auguste’, Phoenix 63: 278–95.Google Scholar
Moore, D. W. (2012), ‘A note on CIL VI.1585a-b and the role of Adrastus, procurator of the Column of Marcus Aurelius’, ZPE 181: 221–29.Google Scholar
Morstein-Marx, R. (2004), Mass Oratory and Political Power in the Late Roman Republic. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Moscovich, M. J. (2004), ‘Cassius Dio’s palace sources for the reign of Septimius Severus’, Historia 53: 356–68.Google Scholar
Mratschek, S. (2013), ‘Nero the imperial misfit: Philhellenism in a rich man’s world’, in Buckley, E. and Dinter, M. (eds.), A Companion to the Neronian Age. Chichester: 45–62.Google Scholar
Murison, C. L. (1999), Rebellion and Reconstruction: Galba to Domitian. An Historical Commentary on Cassius Dio’s Roman History Books 64–67 (AD 68–69). Atlanta.Google Scholar
Musurillo, H. (ed.) (1954), The Acts of the Pagan Martyrs. Acta Alexandrinorum. Oxford.Google Scholar
Németh, A. (2010), Imperial Systematization of the Past: Emperor Constantine VII and His Historical Excerpts. PhD thesis, Central European University.Google Scholar
Németh, A. (2016), ‘Excerpts versus fragments: deconstructions and reconstructions of the Excerpta Constantiniana’, in Grafton, A. and Most, G. W. (eds.), Canonical Texts and Scholarly Practices: A Global Comparative Approach. Cambridge: 253–74.Google Scholar
Neméth, A. (2018), The Excerpta Constantiniana and the Byzantine Appropriation of the Past. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Niebuhr, B. G. (trans. H. M. Chepmell and F. Demmler) (1875), Niebuhr’s Lectures on Roman History: Volume I. London.Google Scholar
Nixon, C. E. V. and Rodgers, B. S. (eds.) (1994), In Praise of Later Roman Emperors: The Panegyrici Latini. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Noreña, C. F. (2009), ‘The ethics of autocracy in the Roman world’, in Balot, R. K. (ed.), A Companion to Greek and Roman Political Thought. Malden, MA: 266–79.Google Scholar
Noreña, C. F. (2011), Imperial Ideals in the Roman West: Representation, Circulation, Power. Cambridge.Google Scholar
North, H. (1966), Sophrosyne: Self-Knowledge and Self-Restraint in Greek Literature. Ithaca.Google Scholar
Nutton, V. (2013), ‘Avoiding distress’, in Singer, P. N. (eds.), Galen. Psychological Writings. Cambridge: 43–106.Google Scholar
Ober, J. (1982), ‘Tiberius and the political testament of Augustus’, Historia 31: 306–28.Google Scholar
Olson, A. (2017), ‘Working with Roman history: Attalieates’ portrayal of the Normans’, BMGS 41: 1–14.Google Scholar
O’Neill, P. (2003), ‘Going round in circles: popular speech in ancient Rome’, Classical Antiquity 22: 135–76.Google Scholar
Osgood, J. (2016), ‘Cassius Dio’s secret history of Elagabalus’, in Lange, C. H. and Madsen, J. M. (eds.), Cassius Dio: Greek Intellectual and Roman Politician. Leiden and Boston: 177–90.Google Scholar
Osgood, J. and Baron, C. (eds.) (2019), Cassius Dio and the Late Republic. Leiden and Boston.Google Scholar
Pandey, N. B. (2018), The Poetics of Power in Augustan Rome. Latin Roman Poetic Responses to Early Imperial Iconography. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Pasek, S. (2013), Coniuratio ad principem occidendum faciendumque. Der erfolgreiche Staatsstreich gegen Commodus und die Regentschaft des Helvius Pertinax (192/193 n. Chr.). Munich.Google Scholar
Paterson, J. (2007), ‘Friends in high places: the creation of the court of the Roman emperor’, in Spawforth, A. J. S. (ed.), The Court and Court Society in Ancient Monarchies. Cambridge: 121–56.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. B. R. (1979), ‘Plutarch’s method of work in the Roman Lives’, JHS 99: 74–96. Reprinted with a postscript in B. Scardigli (ed.) (1995), Essays on Plutarch’s Lives. Oxford: 265–318, and in Pelling 2002: 1–44.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. B. R. (1983), ‘Review of B. Manuwald, Cassius Dio und Augustus’, Gnomon 55: 221–26.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. B. R. (1996), ‘The triumviral period’, in Bowman, A. K., Champlin, E., and Lintott, A. (eds.), The Cambridge Ancient History. Second Edition. Volume X: The Augustan Empire, 43 BC–AD 69. Cambridge: 1–69.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. B. R. (1997a), ‘Biographical history? Cassius Dio on the early principate’, in Edwards, M. J. and Swain, S. (eds.), Portraits: Biographical Representation in the Greek and Latin Literature of the Early Empire. Oxford, 117–44.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. B. R. (1997b), ‘Tragical dreamer: some dreams in the Roman historians’, G&R 44: 197–205.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. B. R. (2006), ‘Breaking the bounds: writing about Julius Caesar’, in McGing, B. and Mossman, J. (eds.), The Limits of Ancient Biography. Swansea: 255–80.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. B. R. (2010a), ‘The spur of Fame: Annals 4.37-8’, in Kraus, C. S., Marincola, J., and Pelling, C. B. R. (eds.), Ancient Historiography and Its Contexts: Studies in Honour of A. J. Woodman. Oxford: 364–85.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. B. R. (2010b), ‘“Learning from that violent schoolmaster”: Thucydidean intertextuality and some Greek views of Roman civil war’, in Breed, B. W., Damon, C., and Rossi, A. (eds.), Citizens of Discord: Rome and Its Civil Wars. Oxford: 105–18.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. B. R. (2018), ‘Dionysius on regime change’, in Hunter, R. and de Jonge, C. C. (eds.), Dionysius of Halicarnassus and Augustan Rome. Cambridge: 203–20.Google Scholar
Penzel, A. J. (ed.) (1786–99), Des Dio Cassius Coccejanus, ehemalige Bürgermeisters in Rom, Jahrbücher römischer Geschichte, 2 vols. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Pfuntner, L. (2015), ‘Reading Diodorus through Photius: the case of the Sicilian slave revolts’, GRBS 55: 256–72.Google Scholar
Pirson, F. (1996), ‘Style and message on the Column of Marcus Aurelius’, PBSR 64: 139–79.Google Scholar
Pitcher, L. (2009a), ‘The Roman historians after Livy’, in Griffin, M. (ed.), A Companion to Julius Caesar. Malden, MA: 267–76.Google Scholar
Pitt-Rivers, J. (1977), The fate of Shechem: Or, The Politics of Sex: Essays in the Anthropology of the Mediterranean. Cambridge and New York.Google Scholar
Pizzone, A. (2017), ‘The Historiai of John Tzetzes: a Byzantine book of memory,’ BMGS 41: 182–207.Google Scholar
Plass, P. (1985), ‘An aspect of epigrammatic wit in Martial and Tacitus’, Arethusa 18: 187–210.Google Scholar
Platon, M. (2016), ‘Sénat et pouvoir impérial dans les livres 57 et 58 de l’Histoire romaine de Cassius Dion’, in Fromentin, V. et al. (eds.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. Bordeaux: 653–75.Google Scholar
Poma, G. (1989), ‘Dionigi d’Alicarnasso e la cittadinanza romana’, MEFRA 101: 187–205.Google Scholar
Pontani, F. (2015), ‘Scholarship in the Byzantine empire (529–1453)’, in Montanari, F., Matthaios, S., and Rengagos, A. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Ancient Greek Scholarship, vol. I. Leiden and Boston: 297–455.Google Scholar
Possienke, H. (2011), ‘Überlegungen zur Darstellung Mark Aurels im Geschichtswerk des Cassius Dio’, in Onken, B. and Rohde, D. (eds.), in In omni historia curiosus: Studie zur Geschichte von der Antike bis zur Neuzeit. Wiesbaden: 43–62.Google Scholar
Potter, D. S. (1994), Prophets and Emperors: Human and Divine Authority from Augustus to Theodosius. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Potter, D. S. (2011), ‘The Greek historians of imperial Rome’, in Woolf, D. (ed.), The Oxford History of Historical Writing, vol. 1. Oxford: 316–45.Google Scholar
Power, T. (2014b), ‘Introduction: the originality of Suetonius’, in Power, T. and Gibson, R. K. (eds.), Suetonius the Biographer: Studies in Roman Lives. Oxford: 1–18.Google Scholar
Power, T. and Gibson, R. K. (2014), Suetonius the Biographer: Studies in Roman Lives. Oxford.Google Scholar
Pye, L. W. (1965), ‘Introduction: political culture and political development’, in Pye, L. W. and Verba, S. (eds.), Political Culture and Political Development. Princeton, NJ: 3–26.Google Scholar
Questa, C. (1957), ‘Tecnica biografica e tecnica annalistica nei libri LXII–LXIII di Cassio Dione’, StudUrb 31: 37–53.Google Scholar
Rantala, J. (2016), ‘Dio the dissident: the portrait of Severus in the Roman History’, in Lange, C. H. and Madsen, J. (eds.), Cassius Dio: Greek Intellectual and Roman Politician. Leiden and Boston: 159–76.Google Scholar
Rees, W. (2011), Cassius Dio, Human Nature, and the late Roman Republic. DPhil thesis, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Reimarus, H. S. (ed.) (1750–52), Ton Dionos tou Kassiou tou Kokkeianou Romaikon historion ta sozomena. Cassii Dionis Cocceiani Historiae Romanae quae supersunt, 2 vols. Hamburg.Google Scholar
Reinhold, M. (1988), From Republic to Principate: An Historical Commentary on Cassius Dio’s Roman History Books 49–52 (36–29 B.C.). Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
Reinhold, M. and Swan, P. (1990), ‘Cassius Dio’s assessment of Augustus’, in Raaflaub, K. A. and Toher, M. (eds.), Between Republic and Empire. Interpretations of Augustus and his Principate. Berkeley: 155–73.Google Scholar
Rich, J. W. (1989), ‘Dio on Augustus’, in Cameron, A. (ed.), History as Text: The Writing of Ancient History. Chapel Hill, NC: 87–110.Google Scholar
Rich, J. W. (1990), Cassius Dio: The Augustan Settlement (Roman History 53–55.9). Warminster.Google Scholar
Rich, J. W. (1998), ‘Augustus’ Parthian honours, the Temple of Mars Ultor and the Arch in the forum Romanum’, PBSR 66: 71–128.Google Scholar
Rich, J. W. (2011), ‘Structuring Roman history: the consular year and the Roman historical tradition’, Histos 5: 1–43. Revised version of article originally published in Histos 1 (1997). Revised and reprinted in J. D. Chaplin and C. S. Kraus (eds.) (2009), Oxford Readings in Classical Studies: Livy. Oxford. 118–47.Google Scholar
Rich, J. W. (2016), ‘Annalistic organization and book division in Dio’s Books 1–35’, in Fromentin, V. et al. (eds.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. Bordeaux: 271–86.Google Scholar
Rich, J. W. (2019), ‘Speech in Cassius Dio’s Roman History Books 1–35’, in Burden-Strevens, C. and Lindholmer, M. O. (eds.), Cassius Dio’s Forgotten History of Early Rome. Leiden and Boston: 217–84.Google Scholar
Rich, J. W. and Williams, J. H. C. (1999), ‘Leges et Iura P.R. Restituit: A new aureus of Octavian and the settlement of 28–27 B.C.’, NC 159: 169–213.Google Scholar
Rives, J. B. (2003), ‘Magic in Roman law: the reconstruction of a crime’, Classical Antiquity 22: 313–39.Google Scholar
Roberto, U. (2009), ‘Byzantine collections of late antique authors: some remarks on the Excerpta historica Constantiniana’, in Wallraff, M. and Mecella, L. (eds.), Texte und Untersuchungen zur Geschichte der altchristlichen Literatur: Die Kestoi des Julius Africanus und ihre Überlieferung. Berlin: 71–84.Google Scholar
Rosillo-López, C. (2017), Public Opinion and Politics in the Late Roman Republic. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Roueché, C. (2002), ‘The literary background of Kekaumenos’, in Holmes, C. and Warring, Judith (eds.), Literacy, Education and Manuscript Transmission in Byzantium and Beyond. Leiden and Boston: 111–38.Google Scholar
Roueché, C. (ed.), (2013), Kekaumenos. Advice and Anecdotes, SAWS Dynamic Library of Wisdom Literatures. Available online at: www.ancientwisdoms.ac.uk/library/kekaumenos-consilia-et-narrationes/Google Scholar
Rowan, C. (2012), Under Divine Auspices: Divine Ideology and the Visualisation of Imperial Power in the Severan Period. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Rowe, G. (2002), Princes and Political Cultures: The New Tiberian Senatorial Decrees. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Saller, R. (1980), ‘Anecdotes as historical evidence for the principate’, G&R 27: 69–83.Google Scholar
Salomies, O. (1990), ‘A note on the establishment of the date of the Rain Miracle under Marcus Aurelius’, Arctos 23: 107.Google Scholar
Scheid, J. (2016), ‘Cassius Dion et la religion dans les livres 50–61. Quelques réflexions sur l’historiographie de l’époque julio-claudienne’, in Fromentin, V. et al. (eds.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. Bordeaux: 787–98.Google Scholar
Schettino, M. T. (1998), ‘Perdono e clementia principis nello stoicismo del II secolo’, in Sordi, M. (ed.), Responsabilità, perdono e vendetta nel mondo antico. Milan: 209–38.Google Scholar
Schettino, M. T. (2001), ‘Cassio Dione e le guerre civile di età severiana’, Gerión 19: 533–58.Google Scholar
Schmidt, M. G. (1989), ‘Cassius Dio, Buch LXX. Bemerkungen zur Technik des Epitomators Ioannes Xiphilinos,’ Chiron 19: 55–9.Google Scholar
Schmidt, M. G. (1997), ‘Die “zeitgeschichtlichen” Bücher im Werk des Cassius Dio: von Commodus zu Severus Alexander’, ANRW 2.34.3: 2591–649.Google Scholar
Schmidt, M. G. (1999), ‘Politische und persönliche Motivation in Dios Zeitgeschichte’, in Zimmermann, M. (ed.), Geschichtsschreibung und politischer Wandel im 3. Jh. n. Chr.: Kolloquium zu Ehren von Karl Ernst Petzold (Juni 1998) anlässlich seines 80. Geburtstags. Wiesbaden: 93–117.Google Scholar
Schöpe, B. (2011), ‘Pertinax: ein verrückt normaler Kaiser’, in Faust, S. and Leitmeir, F. (eds.), Repräsentationsformen in severischer Zeit. Frankfurt: 253–69.Google Scholar
Schulz, V. (2014), ‘Nero und Domitian bei Cassius Dio: Zwei Tyrannen aus der Sicht des 3. Jh. n. Chr.’, in Bönisch-Meyer, S., Cordes, L., and Schulz, V. (eds.), Nero und Domitian: Mediale Diskurse der Herrscherrepräsentation im Vergleich. Munich: 405–34.Google Scholar
Schulz, V. (2015), ‘Kalkuliertes Missverstehen? Zu Störungen der Kommunikation in Tacitus’ Annalen’, Philologus 159: 156–87.Google Scholar
Schulz, V. (2016), ‘Historiography and panegyric: the deconstruction of imperial representation in Cassius Dio’s Roman History’, in Lange, C. H. and Madsen, J. M. (eds.), Cassius Dio: Greek Intellectual and Roman Politician. Leiden and Boston: 276–96.Google Scholar
Schulz, V. (2019a), Deconstructing Imperial Representation: Tacitus, Cassius Dio, and Suetonius on Nero and Domitian, Mnemosyne Supplements 427. Leiden and Boston.Google Scholar
Schulz, V. (2019b), ‘Defining the good ruler: early kings as proto-imperial figures in Cassius Dio’, in Burden-Strevens, C. and Lindholmer, M. (eds.), Cassius Dio’s Forgotten History of Early Rome. Leiden and Boston: 311–32.Google Scholar
Scott, A. G. (2012), ‘Dio and Herodian on the assassination of Caracalla’, CW 106: 15–28.Google Scholar
Scott, A. G. (2017), ‘Cassius Dio on Septimius Severus’ decennalia and ludi saeculares’, Histos 11: 154–61.Google Scholar
Scott, A. G. (2018a) ‘Cassius Dio’s contemporary history as memoir and its implications for authorial identity’, PLLS 17: 229–48.Google Scholar
Scott, A. G. (2018b), Emperors and Usurpers: An Historical Commentary on Cassius Dio’s Roman History Books 79(78)–80(80)(AD 217–229). New York and Oxford.Google Scholar
Scott, J. C. (1990), Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts. New Haven and London.Google Scholar
Shagan, E. H. (2001), ‘Rumours and popular politics in the reign of Henry VIII’, in Harris, T. (ed.), The Politics of the Excluded, c. 1500–1850. Basingstoke and Malden, MA: 30–66.Google Scholar
Sherwin-White, A. N. (1984), Roman Foreign Policy in the East, 168 B.C. to A.D. 1. London.Google Scholar
Shibutani, T. (1966), Improvised News. A Sociological Study of Rumor. Indianapolis and New York.Google Scholar
Shotter, D. C. A. (1967), ‘The debate on Augustus (Tac. Ann. 1, 9–10)’, Mnemosyne 4: 171–4.Google Scholar
Sidebottom, H. (1998), ‘Herodian’s historical methods and understanding of history’, ANRW 2.34.2: 2775–836.Google Scholar
Sidebottom, H. (2007), ‘Severan historiography: evidence, patterns, and arguments’, in Swain, S., Harrison, S., and Elsner, J. (eds.), Severan Culture. Cambridge: 58–82.Google Scholar
Sion-Jenkis, B. (2016), ‘Frauenfiguren bei Cassius Dio: der Fall der Livia’, in Fromentin, V. et al. (eds.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. Bordeaux: 725–40.Google Scholar
Smith, S. D. (2004), Man and Animal in Severan Rome. The Literary Imagination of Claudius Aelianus. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Smits, J. C. P. (1914), Die Vita Commodi und Cassius Dio. Eine quellenanalytische Untersuchung. Leiden.Google Scholar
Sommer, M. (2004), ‘Elagabal: Wege zur Konstruktion eines ‘schlechten’ Kaisers’, SCI 23: 95–110.Google Scholar
Spawforth, A. (1994), ‘Symbol of unity? The Persian Wars tradition in the Roman empire’, in Hornblower, S. (ed.), Greek Historiography. Oxford: 233–47.Google Scholar
Speidel, M. A. (2017), ‘Antoninus Pius, das Militär und der Krieg. Epigraphische Korrekturen zur literarischen Überlieferung’, in Michels, C. and Mittag, P. F. (eds.), Jenseits des Narrativs: Antoninus Pius in den nicht-literarischen Quellen. Stuttgart: 225–68.Google Scholar
Spielberg, L. (2019), ‘Fairy tales and hard truths in Tacitus’s Histories 4.6–10’, CA 38: 141–83.Google Scholar
Steidle, W. (1988), ‘Beobachtungen zum Geschichtswerk des Cassius Dio’, WJA 14: 203–24.Google Scholar
Stephanus, H. (ed.) (1591), Ton Dionos tou Kassiou Romaikon historion biblia pente kai eikosi. Dionis Cassii Romanarum historiarum libri XXV, ex Guilielmi Xylandri interpretatione. Geneva.Google Scholar
Stevenson, T. R. (2013), ‘The succession planning of Augustus’, Antichthon 47: 118–39.Google Scholar
Stewart, P. (2012), ‘The equestrian statue of Marcus Aurelius’, in van Ackeren, M. (ed.), A Companion to Marcus Aurelius. Oxford and Malden, MA: 264–77.Google Scholar
Strobel, K. (2004), ‘Commodus und Pertinax: “Perversion der Macht” und “Restauration des Guten”?’, in Heftner, H. and Tomaschitz, K. (eds.), Ad Fontes! Festschrift für Gerhard Dobesch zum 65. Geburtstag am 15 September 2004, dargebracht von Kollegen, Schülern und Freunden. Vienna: 519–32.Google Scholar
Stuart, D. R. (1904), ‘The attitude of Dio Cassius toward the epigraphic sources’, in Sanders, H. A. (ed.), Roman Historical Sources and Institutions. New York and London: 101–47.Google Scholar
Swain, S. (1996), Hellenism and Empire: Language, Classicism, and Power in the Greek World AD 50–250. Oxford.Google Scholar
Swain, S. (1997), ‘Biography and biographic in the literature of the Roman empire’, in Edwards, M. J. and Swain, S. (eds.), Portraits: Biographical Representation in the Greek and Latin Literature of the Roman Empire. Oxford: 1–37.Google Scholar
Swan, P. M. (1987), ‘Cassius Dio on Augustus: a poverty of annalistic sources?’, Phoenix 41: 272–91.Google Scholar
Swan, P. M. (1997), ‘How Cassius Dio composed his Augustan books: four studies’, ANRW 2.34.3: 2524–557.Google Scholar
Swan, P. M. (2004), The Augustan Succession: An Historical Commentary on Cassius Dio’s Roman History Books 55–56. Oxford.Google Scholar
Syme, R. (1956), ‘Some friends of the Caesars’, AJPh 77: 264–73. Republished in Badian, E. (ed.) (1979), Roman Papers. Volume 1. Oxford: 292–99.Google Scholar
Thomasson, B. E. (1996), Fasti Africani: senatorische und ritterliche Amtsträger in den römischen Provinzen Nordafrikas von Augustus bis Diokletian. Stockholm.Google Scholar
Toher, M. (2009), ‘Divining a lost text: Augustus’ Autobiography and the βίος Καίσαρος of Nicolaus of Damascus’, in Smith, C. and Powell, A. (eds.), The Lost Memoirs of Augustus and the Development of Roman Autobiography. Swansea: 125–44.Google Scholar
Townend, G. B. (1961), ‘Traces in Dio Cassius of Cluvius, Aufidius and Pliny’, Hermes 89: 227–48.Google Scholar
Tränkle, H. (1969), ‘Augustus bei Tacitus, Cassius Dio und dem älteren Plinius’, WS 82: 108–30.Google Scholar
Untila, A. et al. (trans.) (2000–17), Chiliades or Book of Histories. www.theoi.com/Text/TzetzesChiliades1.htmlGoogle Scholar
Urban, R. (1979), ‘Tacitus und die Res Gestae Divi Augusti: Die Auseinandersetzung des Historikers mit der offiziellen Darstellung’, Gymnasium 86: 59–74.Google Scholar
Urso, G. (2013), ‘L’octroi de la citoyenneté romaine aux Latins: un anachronisme de Cassius Dion’, Erga-Logoi 2: 73–83.Google Scholar
Urso, G. (2016a), ‘Cassius Dion témoin de traditions disparues: les premiers siècles de la République’, in Fromentin, V. et al. (eds.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. Bordeaux: 143–58.Google Scholar
Urso, G. (2016b), ‘Cassius Dio’s Sulla: exemplum of cruelty and Republican dictator’, in Lange, C. H. and Madsen, J. M. (eds.), Cassius Dio. Greek Intellectual and Roman Politician. Leiden and Boston: 13–32.Google Scholar
Urso, G. (2019), ‘Cassio Dione e le fonti pre-Liviane: una versione alternative dei primi secoli di Roma’, in C. Burden-Strevens and M. Lindholmer (eds.) (2019), Cassius Dio’s Forgotten History of Early Rome. Leiden and Boston: 53–75.Google Scholar
van den Hout, M. P. J. (ed.) (1988), M. Cornelii Frontonis Epistulae. 2nd edition. Leipzig.Google Scholar
van Minnen, P. (2001), ‘P. Oxy. LXVI 4527 and the Antonine Plague in the Fayyum’, ZPE 135: 175–7.Google Scholar
van Stekelenburg, A. V. (1976), ‘Lucan and Cassius Dio as heirs to Livy: the speech of Julius Caesar at Placentia’, AClass 19: 43–57.Google Scholar
Varga, R. and Pázsint, A.-I. (2019), ‘The reflection of personal and collective tragedies in ancient sources 2. Tragedies in Roman epigraphy’, Journal of Ancient History and Archaeology 6.3: 49–58.Google Scholar
Varner, E. R. (2004), Mutilation and Transformation. Damnatio Memoriae and Roman Imperial Portraiture. Leiden and Boston.Google Scholar
Veh, O. and Wirth, G. (eds.) (1985–92), Cassius Dio: Römische Geschichte, 5 vols. Zurich and Munich.Google Scholar
Vittinghoff, F. (1936), Der Staatsfeind in der römischen Kaiserzeit. Untersuchungen zur „damnatio memoriae”. Berlin.Google Scholar
Viviani, G. (ed.) (1790–2), Istorie Romane di Dione Cassio tradotte da G. Viviani, 4 vols. Milan.Google Scholar
Wagemakers, B. (2010), ‘Incest, infanticide, and cannibalism: anti-Christian imputations in the Roman empire’, G&R 57: 337–54.Google Scholar
Wagner, J. A. (ed.) (1783–96), Dio Cassius röm. Geschichte, aus dem Gr. übersetzt von J. Aug. Wagner, 5 vols. Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Walbank, F. W. (1990), ‘Profit or amusement: some thoughts on the motives of Hellenistic historians’, in Verdin, H., Schepens, G., and de Keyser, E. (eds.), Purposes of History. Studies in Greek Historiography from the 4th to the 2nd Centuries BC. Studia Hellenistica 30. Leuven: 253–66.Google Scholar
Walker, S. (2000), ‘Rumour, sedition and popular protest in the reign of Henry IV’, P&P 146: 31–65.Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A. (1982), ‘Civilis princeps: between citizen and king’, JRS 72: 32–48.Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A. (1996), ‘The imperial court’, in Bowman, A. K., Champlin, E. and Lintott, A. (eds.), The Cambridge Ancient History. Second Edition. Volume X: The Augustan Empire, 43 BC–AD 69. Cambridge: 283–308.Google Scholar
Wardle, D. (2002), ‘The heroism and heroisation of Tiberius’, in Defosse, P. (ed.), Hommages à Carl Deroux, II – Prose et linguistique, Médecine. Brussels: 433–40.Google Scholar
Westall, R. (2016), ‘The sources of Cassius Dio for the Roman civil wars of 49–30 BC’, in Lange, C. H. and Madsen, J. M. (eds.), Cassius Dio. Greek Intellectual and Roman Politician. Leiden and Boston: 51–75.Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. J. G. (1999), ‘Greek and Roman in dialogue: the Pseudo-Lucianic Nero’, JHS 119: 142–60.Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. J. G. (2001), ‘Greece is the world: exile and identity in the Second Sophistic’, in Goldhill, S. (ed.), Being Greek under Rome: Cultural Identity, the Second Sophistic and the Development of Empire. Cambridge: 269–305.Google Scholar
Whittaker, C. R. (ed.) (1969), Herodian: History of the Empire, 2 vols. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Winterling, A. (1999), Aula Caesaris. Studien zur Institutionalisierung des römischen Kaiserhofes in der Zeit von Augustus bis Commodus (31 v. Chr.— 192 n. Chr.). Berlin.Google Scholar
Woodman, A. J. (1977), Velleius Paterculus 2.94–131: The Tiberian Narrative. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Woodman, A. J. (1992). ‘Amateur dramatics at the court of Nero: Annals 15.48–74’, in Luce, T. J. and Woodman, A. J. (eds.), Tacitus and the Tacitean Tradition, Princeton, NJ: 104–28. Reprinted in Woodman 1998: 190–217.Google Scholar
Woodman, A. J. (2006), ‘Mutiny and madness: Tacitus Annals 1.16–49’, Arethusa 39: 303–29.Google Scholar
Wolff, H. (1976), Die Constitutio Antoniniana und Papyrus Gissensis 40 I, 2 vols. Cologne.Google Scholar
Xylander, G. (ed.) (1558), Dionis Casii Nicaei Romanae historiae libri (tot enim hodie extant) XXV, nimirum a XXXVI ad LXI: quibus exponuntur res gestae a bello Cretico vsque ad mortem Claudii Caesaris, quae est historia annorum circiter CXXX. Nunc primum summa fide diligentiaque de Graecis Latini facti, Guilielmo Xylandro Augustano interprete. Basel.Google Scholar
Zanker, P. (2010), ‘By the emperor, for the people,’ in Ewald, B. C. and Noreña, C. F. (eds.), The Emperor and Rome: Space, Representation, and Ritual. Cambridge: 45–87.Google Scholar
Zecchini, G. (1987), Il Carmen de bello Actiaco. Storiografia e lotta politica in età augustea. Wiesbaden and Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Zecchini, G. (1998), ‘Asinio Quadrato storico di Filippo l’Arabo’, ANRW 2.34.4: 2999–3021.Google Scholar
Zecchini, G. (2016), ‘Cassius Dion et l’historiographie de son temps’, in Fromentin, V. et al. (eds.), Cassius Dion: nouvelles lectures. Bordeaux: 113–24.Google Scholar