Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T20:05:32.252Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 11 - Leveraging Parent–Youth Interactions to Measure and Analyze Emotion Regulation

from Part IV - Current Trends

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2024

By
Sarah A. Thomas  and
Lauren Micalizzi
Edited by
Isabelle Roskam ,
James J. Gross  and
Moïra Mikolajczak
Isabelle Roskam
Affiliation:
Université Catholique de Louvain, Belgium
James J. Gross
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Moïra Mikolajczak
Affiliation:
Université Catholique de Louvain, Belgium
Get access

Summary

Developmental theories propose that children learn emotion regulation through dynamic interactions with their parents over time. Emotion regulation is transmitted intergenerationally through environmental and genetic pathways, yet both parents and children evoke regulatory capacities from each other. Further, these interactive effects iterate on a micro -level day by day, as well as on a longer time scale, influenced by factors like parenting style and dyadic conflict. Thus, dyadic parent–child emotion regulation is a bidirectional developmental process requiring careful study design, measurement, and analysis. Yet there are fewer research studies on these dynamic processes than one would expect, perhaps due to the aforementioned complexity. In this chapter, we provide a brief theoretical background on interactive emotion regulation between parent–child dyads, review example studies that have addressed these processes, identify conceptual and methodological barriers to conducting this research, and provide resources for researchers. Finally, we highlight the Actor–Partner Interdependence Model to derive interactive and bidirectional inferences into parent–youth emotion regulation.

Keywords

parentingemotionemotion regulationActor–Partner Interdependence Modeldyadic interactionchildrenadolescentsdevelopment
Type
Chapter
Information
Emotion Regulation and Parenting , pp. 205 - 228
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abney, D. H., daSilva, E. B., & Bertenthal, B. I. (2021). Associations between infant–mother physiological synchrony and 4- and 6-month-old infants’ emotion regulation. Developmental Psychobiology, 63(6), e22161. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/dev.22161Google Scholar
Aldao, A., Gee, D. G., De Los Reyes, A., & Seager, I. (2016). Emotion regulation as a transdiagnostic factor in the development of internalizing and externalizing psychopathology: Current and future directions. Development and Psychopathology, 28(4pt1), 927–946. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579416000638CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J. M. (1997). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Beauchaine, T. P. (2015). Future directions in emotion dysregulation and youth psychopathology. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 44(5), 875–896. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2015.1038827CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bell, R. Q. (1968). A reinterpretation of the direction of effects in studies of socialization. Psychological Review, 75(2), 81–95. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0025583Google Scholar
Bettis, A. H., Burke, T. A., Nesi, J., & Liu, R. T. (2022). Digital technologies for emotion-regulation assessment and intervention: A conceptual review. Clinical Psychological Science, 10(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/21677026211011982Google Scholar
Bodner, N., Kuppens, P., Allen, N. B., Sheeber, L. B., & Ceulemans, E. (2018). Affective family interactions and their associations with adolescent depression: A dynamic network approach. Development and Psychopathology, 30(4), 1459–1473. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579417001699CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boeve, J. L., Beeghly, M., Stacks, A. M., Manning, J. H., & Thomason, M. E. (2019). Using the Actor–Partner Interdependence Model to assess maternal and infant contributions to mother-infant affective exchanges during the Still-Face Paradigm. Infant Behavior and Development, 57, 101351. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2019.101351Google Scholar
Bolger, N., & Laurenceau, J. (2013). Design and analysis of intensive longitudinal studies of distinguishable dyads. In Kenny, D. A. & Little, T. D. (Eds.), Intensive longitudinal methods: An introduction to diary and experience sampling research (pp. 143–171). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Bridgett, D. J., Burt, N. M., Edwards, E. S., & Deater-Deckard, K. (2015). Intergenerational transmission of self-regulation: A multidisciplinary review and integrative conceptual framework. Psychological Bulletin, 141(3), 602–654. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038662Google Scholar
Byrd, A. L., Lee, A. H., Frigoletto, O. A., Zalewski, M., & Stepp, S. D. (2021). Applying new RDoC dimensions to the development of emotion regulation: Examining the influence of maternal emotion regulation on within-individual change in child emotion regulation. Development and Psychopathology, 33(5), 1821–1836. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579421000948Google Scholar
Chan, M. H.-M., Feng, X., Inboden, K., Hooper, E. G., & Gerhardt, M. (2022). Dynamic, bidirectional influences of children’s emotions and maternal regulatory strategies. Emotion, 22(8), 1841–1855. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0001005Google Scholar
Chaplin, T. M., Sinha, R., Simmons, J. A., Healy, S. M., Mayes, L. C., Hommer, R. E., & Crowley, M. J. (2012). Parent–adolescent conflict interactions and adolescent alcohol use. Addictive Behaviors, 37(5), 605–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2012.01.004CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cole, P. M., Michel, M. K., & Laureen O’Donnell, T. (1994). The development of emotion regulation and dysregulation: A clinical perspective. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 59(2–3), 73–100. https://doi.org/10.2307/1166139Google Scholar
Cook, W. L., & Kenny, D. A. (2005). The Actor–Partner Interdependence Model: A model of bidirectional effects in developmental studies. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29(2), 101–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/01650250444000405Google Scholar
Cui, L., Morris, A. S., Harrist, A. W., Larzelere, R. E., Criss, M. M., & Houltberg, B. J. (2015). Adolescent RSA responses during an anger discussion task: Relations to emotion regulation and adjustment. Emotion, 15(3), 360–372. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000040CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Los Reyes, A., Augenstein, T. M., Wang, M., Thomas, S. A., Drabick, D. A., Burgers, D. E., & Rabinowitz, J. (2015). The validity of the multi-informant approach to assessing child and adolescent mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 141(4), 858-–900. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038498Google Scholar
De Los Reyes, A., Thomas, S. A., Goodman, K. L., & Kundey, S. M. (2013). Principles underlying the use of multiple informants’ reports. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 9, 123–149. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050212-185617CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dixon-Gordon, K. L., Bernecker, S. L., & Christensen, K. (2015). Recent innovations in the field of interpersonal emotion regulation. Current Opinion in Psychology, 3, 36–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.02.001Google Scholar
Donenberg, G. R., & Weisz, J. R. (1997). Experimental task and speaker effects on parent-child interactions of aggressive and depressed/anxious children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 25(5), 367–387. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025733023979Google Scholar
Gates, K. M., & Liu, S. (2016). Methods for quantifying patterns of dynamic interactions in dyads. Assessment, 23(4), 459–471. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191116641508Google Scholar
Girard, J. M., & Cohn, J. F. (2016). A primer on observational measurement. Assessment, 23(4), 404–413. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191116635807Google Scholar
Gistelinck, F., & Loeys, T. (2019). The Actor–Partner Interdependence Model for longitudinal dyadic data: An implementation in the SEM framework. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 26(3), 329–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2018.1527223Google Scholar
Gottman, J. M., Katz, L. F., & Hooven, C. (1997). Meta-emotion: How families communicate emotionally. Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Gratz, K. L., & Roemer, L. (2004). Multidimensional assessment of emotion regulation and dysregulation: Development, factor structure, and initial validation of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 26(1), 41–54. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOBA.0000007455.08539.94Google Scholar
Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 348–362. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.348CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hajal, N. J., Teti, D. M., Cole, P. M., & Ram, N. (2019). Maternal emotion, motivation, and regulation during real-world parenting challenges. Journal of Family Psychology, 33(1), 109–120. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000475CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hanley, J. A., Negassa, A., Edwardes, M. D. D., & Forrester, J. E. (2003). Statistical analysis of correlated data using generalized estimating equations: An orientation. American Journal of Epidemiology, 157(4), 364–375. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwf215Google Scholar
Hendriks, A. M., Van der Giessen, D., Stams, G., & Overbeek, G. (2018). The association between parent-reported and observed parenting: A multi-level meta-analysis. Psychological Assessment, 30(5), 621–633. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000500CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hofmann, S. G. (2014). Interpersonal emotion regulation model of mood and anxiety disorders. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 38(5), 483–492. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-014-9620-1Google Scholar
Hofmann, S. G., Carpenter, J. K., & Curtiss, J. (2016). Interpersonal Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (IERQ): Scale development and psychometric characteristics. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 40(3), 341–356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-016-9756-2Google Scholar
Kaufman, E. A., Xia, M., Fosco, G., Yaptangco, M., Skidmore, C. R., & Crowell, S. E. (2016). The Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale Short Form (DERS-SF): Validation and replication in adolescent and adult samples. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 38(3), 443–455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-015-9529-3Google Scholar
Keijsers, L., Boele, S., & Bulow, A. (2022). Measuring parent-adolescent interactions in natural habitats. The potential, status, and challenges of ecological momentary assessment. Current Opinion in Psychology, 44, 264–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.10.002Google Scholar
Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Cook, W. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. Guilford. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2006-12719-000&site=ehost-liveGoogle Scholar
Kerr, M. L., Rasmussen, H. F., Smiley, P. A., Buttitta, K. V., & Borelli, J. L. (2021). The development of toddlers’ emotion regulation within the family system: Associations with observed parent-child synchrony and interparental relationship satisfaction. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 57, 215–227. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2021.06.004Google Scholar
Kiel, E. J., & Kalomiris, A. E. (2015). Current themes in understanding children’s emotion regulation as developing from within the parent–child relationship. Current Opinion in Psychology, 3, 11–16. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.01.006CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ledermann, T., & Kenny, D. A. (2017). Analyzing dyadic data with multilevel modeling versus structural equation modeling: A tale of two methods. Journal of Family Psychology, 31(4), 442–452. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000290Google Scholar
Li, D., Li, D., Wu, N., & Wang, Z. (2019). Intergenerational transmission of emotion regulation through parents’ reactions to children’s negative emotions: Tests of unique, actor, partner, and mediating effects. Children and Youth Services Review, 101, 113–122.Google Scholar
Micalizzi, L., Ronald, A., & Saudino, K. J. (2016). A genetically informed cross-lagged analysis of autistic-like traits and affective problems in early childhood. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 44(5), 937–947. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-015-0088-6Google Scholar
Micalizzi, L., Wang, M., & Saudino, K. J. (2017). Difficult temperament and negative parenting in early childhood: A genetically informed cross-lagged analysis. Developmental Science, 20(2), e12355. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12355CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morris, A. S., Criss, M. M., Silk, J. S., & Houltberg, B. J. (2017). The impact of parenting on emotion regulation during childhood and adolescence. Child Development Perspectives, 11(4), 233–238. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12238Google Scholar
Morris, A. S., Cui, L., Criss, M. M., & Simmons, W. K. (2018). Emotion regulation dynamics during parent–child interactions: Implications for research and practice. In Cole, P. M. H., T. (Ed.), Emotion regulation (pp. 70–90). Routledge.Google Scholar
Morris, A. S., Silk, J. S., Steinberg, L., Myers, S. S., & Robinson, L. R. (2007). The role of the family context in the development of emotion regulation. Social Development, 16(2), 361–388. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2007.00389.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muniz-Terrera, G., Robitaille, A., Kelly, A., Johansson, B., Hofer, S., & Piccinin, A. (2017). Latent growth models matched to research questions to answer questions about dynamics of change in multiple processes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 82, 158–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.09.001Google Scholar
Niven, K., Totterdell, P., Stride, C. B., & Holman, D. (2011). Emotion Regulation of Others and Self (EROS): The development and validation of a new individual difference measure. Current Psychology, 30(1), 53–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-011-9099-9Google Scholar
Olson, S. L., & Sameroff, A. J. (Eds.). (2009). Biopsychosocial regulatory processes in the development of childhood behavioral problems. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Page-Gould, E. (2017). Multilevel modeling. In Cacioppo, J. T., Tassinary, L. G., & Berntson, G. G. (Eds.), Handbook of psychophysiology (pp. 662–678). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Paley, B., & Hajal, N. J. (2022). Conceptualizing emotion regulation and coregulation as family-level phenomena. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 25(1), 19–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-022-00378-4Google Scholar
Patterson, G. R. (2016). Coercion theory: The study of change. In Dishion, T. J., Snyder, J., & Patterson, G. R. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of coercive relationship dynamics (pp. 7–22). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199324552.013.2Google Scholar
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879Google Scholar
Prinz, R. J., Foster, S. L., Kent, R. N., & O’Leary, K. D. (1979). Multivariate assessment of conflict in distressed and nondistressed mother–adolescent dyads. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 12(4), 691–700. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1979.12-691CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ratliff, E. L., Kerr, K. L., Misaki, M., Cosgrove, K. T., Moore, A. J., DeVille, D. C., Silk, J. S., Barch, D. M., Tapert, S. F., Simmons, W. K., Bodurka, J., & Morris, A. S. (2021). Into the unknown: Examining neural representations of parent–adolescent interactions. Child Development, 92(6), e1361–e1376. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13635Google Scholar
Reindl, V., Gerloff, C., Scharke, W., & Konrad, K. (2018). Brain-to-brain synchrony in parent-child dyads and the relationship with emotion regulation revealed by fNIRS-based hyperscanning. Neuroimage, 178, 493–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.05.060CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rothenberg, W. A., Weinstein, A., Dandes, E. A., & Jent, J. F. (2019). Improving child emotion regulation: Effects of parent–child interaction-therapy and emotion socialization strategies. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 28(3), 720–731. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-018-1302-2Google Scholar
Sameroff, A. (2009). The transactional model. In Sameroff, A. (Ed.), The transactional model of development: How children and contexts shape each other (pp. 3–21). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/11877-001Google Scholar
Sameroff, A. (2010). Dynamic developmental systems: Chaos and order. In Evans, In G. W. & Wachs, T. D. (Eds.), Chaos and its influence on children’s development: An ecological perspective (pp. 255–264). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/12057-016Google Scholar
Savord, A., McNeish, D., Iida, M., Quiroz, S., & Ha, T. (2022). Fitting the longitudinal Actor-Partner Interdependence Model as a dynamic structural equation model in Mplus. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2022.2065279Google Scholar
Sheppes, G., Suri, G., & Gross, J. J. (2015). Emotion regulation and psychopathology. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 11, 379–405. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032814-112739Google Scholar
Shiffman, S., Stone, A. A., & Hufford, M. R. (2008). Ecological momentary assessment. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 4, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091415Google Scholar
Silk, J. S. (2019). Context and dynamics: The new frontier for developmental research on emotion regulation. Developmental Psychology, 55(9), 2009–2014. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000768Google Scholar
Silk, J. S., Forbes, E. E., Whalen, D. J., Jakubcak, J. L., Thompson, W. K., Ryan, N. D., Axelson, D. A., Birmaher, B., & Dahl, R. E. (2011). Daily emotional dynamics in depressed youth: A cell phone ecological momentary assessment study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 110(2), 241–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2010.10.007Google Scholar
Silvers, J. A., Shu, J., Hubbard, A. D., Weber, J., & Ochsner, K. N. (2015). Concurrent and lasting effects of emotion regulation on amygdala response in adolescence and young adulthood. Developmental Science, 18(5), 771–784. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12260CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stas, L., Kenny, D. A., Mayer, A., & Loeys, T. (2018). Giving dyadic data analysis away: A user-friendly app for actor-partner interdependence models. Personal Relationships, 25(1), 103–119. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, L. B., Mennies, R. J., Waller, J. M., Ladouceur, C. D., Forbes, E. E., Ryan, N. D., Dahl, R. E., & Silk, J. S. (2019). Help me feel better! Ecological momentary assessment of anxious youths’ emotion regulation with parents and peers. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 47(2), 313–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-018-0454-2Google Scholar
Thomas, S. A., Brick, L. A., Micalizzi, L., Wolff, J. C., Frazier, E. A., Graves, H., Esposito-Smytherse, C., & Spirito, A. (2020). Parent–adolescent relationship characteristics and adolescent cannabis use: A growth curve analysis. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 46(5), 659–669. https://doi.org/10.1080/00952990.2020.1789159Google Scholar
Thomas, S. A., Deros, D. E., Jain, A., Jacobs, I., & De Los Reyes, A. (2022, December 2). Links between parental monitoring and parent-adolescent conflict: A multi-modal test of bidirectional relations. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/xfj48Google Scholar
Thomas, S. A., Jain, A., Wilson, T., Deros, D. E., Jacobs, I., Dunn, E. J., Aldao, A., Stadnik, R., & De Los Reyes, A. (2019). Moderated mediation of the link between parent-adolescent conflict and adolescent risk-taking: The role of physiological regulation and hostile behavior in an experimentally controlled investigation. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 41, 699–715. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-019-09747-wGoogle Scholar
Thomas, S. A., Wilson, T., Jain, A., Deros, D. E., Um, M., Hurwitz, J., Jacobs, I., Myerberg, L., Ehrlich, K. B., Dunn, E. J., Aldao, A., Stadnik, R., & De Los Reyes, A. (2017). Toward developing laboratory-based parent-adolescent conflict discussion tasks that consistently elicit adolescent conflict-related stress responses: Support from physiology and observed behavior. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 26(12), 3288–3302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-017-0844-zGoogle Scholar
Thompson, R. A. (2011). Emotion and emotion regulation: Two sides of the developing coin. Emotion Review, 3(1), 53–61.Google Scholar
Thorson, K. R., West, T. V., & Mendes, W. B. (2018). Measuring physiological influence in dyads: A guide to designing, implementing, and analyzing dyadic physiological studies. Psychological Methods, 23(4), 595–616. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000166CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trucco, E. M., Cristello, J. V., & Sutherland, M. T. (2021). Do parents still matter? The impact of parents and peers on adolescent electronic cigarette use. Journal of Adolescent Health, 68(4), 780–786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.12.002Google Scholar
Turpyn, C. C., Chaplin, T. M., Cook, E. C., & Martelli, A. M. (2015). A person-centered approach to adolescent emotion regulation: Associations with psychopathology and parenting. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 136, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2015.02.009Google Scholar
Waller, J. M., Silk, J. S., Stone, L. B., & Dahl, R. E. (2014). Co-rumination and co-problem solving in the daily lives of adolescents with major depressive disorder. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 53(8), 869–878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2014.05.004Google Scholar
Williams, W. C., Morelli, S. A., Ong, D. C., & Zaki, J. (2018). Interpersonal emotion regulation: Implications for affiliation, perceived support, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 115(2), 224–254. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000132Google Scholar
Wolff, J. C., Thomas, S. A., Hood, E., Bettis, A. H., Rizzo, C. J., & Liu, R. T. (2020). Application of the actor-partner interdependence model in parent-adolescent emotion regulation and depression. Journal of Affective Disorders, 277, 733–741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.08.075Google Scholar
Wright, A. G., & Hopwood, C. J. (2016). Advancing the assessment of dynamic psychological processes. Assessment, 23(4), 399–403. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191116654760Google Scholar
Zaki, J., & Williams, W. C. (2013). Interpersonal emotion regulation. Emotion, 13(5), 803–810. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033839Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×