Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Table of Contents
- Abbreviations
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Emerging Civic Urbanisms in Asia: An Introduction
- 2 Walking Tours and Community Heritage in Singapore: Civic Activism in the Making in Queenstown and Geylang
- 3 Resistance and Resilience: A Case Study of Rebuilding the Choi Yuen Village in Hong Kong
- 4 Urban Planning, Public Interest, and Spatial Justice: A Case Study of the Lo-Sheng Sanatorium Preservation Movement in Taipei
- 5 Placemaking as Social Learning: Taipei’s Open Green Programme as Pedagogical Civic Urbanism
- 6 Hong Kong’s Urban Renewal Fund: A Step towards Citizen-driven Placemaking?
- 7 Re-emerging Civic Urbanism: The Evolving State–Civil Society Relations in Community Building in Seoul
- 8 A Shifting Paradigm of Urban Regeneration in Seoul?: A Case Study of Citizen Participation in Haebangchon Urban Regeneration Project
- 9 Building Communities through Neighbourhood-based: Participatory Planning in Singapore
- 10 Beyond the Sunday Spectacle: Foreign Domestic Workers and Emergent Civic Urbanisms in Hong Kong
- 11 Holding Space, Making Place: Nurturing Emergent Solidarities within New Food Systems in Singapore
- 12 Conclusion: Civic Urbanisms and Urban Governance in Asia and Beyond
- Index
- Publications/Global Asia
9 - Building Communities through Neighbourhood-based:Participatory Planning in Singapore
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 November 2022
- Frontmatter
- Table of Contents
- Abbreviations
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Emerging Civic Urbanisms in Asia: An Introduction
- 2 Walking Tours and Community Heritage in Singapore: Civic Activism in the Making in Queenstown and Geylang
- 3 Resistance and Resilience: A Case Study of Rebuilding the Choi Yuen Village in Hong Kong
- 4 Urban Planning, Public Interest, and Spatial Justice: A Case Study of the Lo-Sheng Sanatorium Preservation Movement in Taipei
- 5 Placemaking as Social Learning: Taipei’s Open Green Programme as Pedagogical Civic Urbanism
- 6 Hong Kong’s Urban Renewal Fund: A Step towards Citizen-driven Placemaking?
- 7 Re-emerging Civic Urbanism: The Evolving State–Civil Society Relations in Community Building in Seoul
- 8 A Shifting Paradigm of Urban Regeneration in Seoul?: A Case Study of Citizen Participation in Haebangchon Urban Regeneration Project
- 9 Building Communities through Neighbourhood-based: Participatory Planning in Singapore
- 10 Beyond the Sunday Spectacle: Foreign Domestic Workers and Emergent Civic Urbanisms in Hong Kong
- 11 Holding Space, Making Place: Nurturing Emergent Solidarities within New Food Systems in Singapore
- 12 Conclusion: Civic Urbanisms and Urban Governance in Asia and Beyond
- Index
- Publications/Global Asia
Summary
Abstract
This chapter reflects on the community-buildingpotential of neighbourhood- based participatoryplanning processes, based on a non-profitorganization's experiences in Singapore'sNeighbourhood Renewal Programmes (NRPs). The NRPis a key government framework for residentparticipation in the revival of middle-aged publichousing estates. Using a strategic-relationalinstitutionalist approach, this chapter highlightshow the capacity of the NRP to buildrelationships, and thereby enable local residentsto take collective action and influencedecision-making, is shaped by the dialecticalinteractions between various actors andinstitutions. It concludes that theseactor-institution dynamics, as seen in fourinstances of the NRP, privilege the fostering ofsocial cohesion and the observance of rules andprocedures, over the empowerment of residents.
Keywords: Participatory planning,community building, Neighbourhood RenewalProgramme, Singapore, public housing
Introduction
This chapter presents a practitioner's perspective onneighbourhood-based participatory planning – as aform of civic urbanism – and its communitybuildingpotential. Community building is broadly understoodas the building of relationships within and beyondthe community, for the purpose of effecting changeand solving community-defined problems. It ofteninvolves the development of different types ofsocial capital, the mobilization of existing assets,the grooming of local leaders, the participation andvoluntary actions of local residents, and thebuilding of consensus (Hess, 1999; McNeely, 1999;Saegert, 2006). Participation is variously seen as abasis, part, or instrument of community building (DeSouza Briggs, 1998; English, Peretz, andManderschied, 2004; Foster-Fishman, Cantillon,Pierce, and Van Egeren, 2007; Ledwidth, 2011; Choand Ho, 2020).
Critical perspectives of both participatory planningand community building often point to the need tounderstand the interplay between, on the one hand,contextual factors, larger agendas, politics, andurban processes at wider city, regional, and globalscales, and on the other hand, actions and outcomesat the local neighbourhood level (see e.g., Fraser,Lepofsky, Kick, and Williams, 2003; Foster-Fishman,Cantillon, Pierce, and Van Egeren, 2007; Moulaert,Swyngedouw, Martinelli, and González, 2010; Van denBroeck, 2019). Spaces for civic urbanism may befraught with power relations particularly where theyinvolve, or lead to, partnerships with governmentactors (see Cho, Križnik, and Hou, Chapter 1, thisvolume).
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Emerging Civic Urbanisms in AsiaHong Kong, Seoul, Singapore, and Taipei beyondDevelopmental Urbanization, pp. 221 - 244Publisher: Amsterdam University PressPrint publication year: 2022