Amerasinghe, C. F., Principles of the Institutional Law of International Organizations 2nd rev. ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005)Google Scholar

Aristotle, and Everson, S., The Politics; and, The Constitution of Athens 2nd ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996)Google Scholar

Arnull, A., The European Union and Its Court of Justice 2nd ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aust, A., Modern Treaty Law and Practice 3rd ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013)Google Scholar

Balassa, B., The Theory of Economic Integration (Homewood, Illinois: Richard D. Irwin, 1961)Google Scholar

Barak, A., Judicial Discretion (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1989)Google Scholar

Barents, R., The Autonomy of Community law (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2004)Google Scholar

Beck, G., The Legal Reasoning of the Court of Justice of the EU (Oxford and Portland, Oregon: Hart Publishing, 2012)Google Scholar

Bekiashev, K. A., Bekiashev, D. K., Kashkin, S. Y., Moiseev, E. G. and Suleymanov, T. V., Mezhdunarodno-pravovye osnovy sozdaniia i funkcionirovniia Evraziiskogo ekonomicheskogo soiuza (Moscow: Prospekt, 2015)Google Scholar

Bekiashev, K. and Moiseev, E., Pravo Evraziiskogo ekonomicheskogo soiuza (Moscow: Prospekt, 2016)Google Scholar

Bernard, C., Leçons sur les phénomènes de la vie communs aux animaux et aux végétaux (Paris: Baillière, 1878)Google Scholar

Björkdahl, A., Chaban, N., Leslie, J. and Masselot, A., Importing EU Norms: Conceptual Framework and Empirical Findings (Cham: Springer, 2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brownlie, I., The Rule of Law in International Affairs: International Law at the Fiftieth Anniversary of the United Nations (The Hague: M. Nijhoff Publishers; Kluwer Law International, 1998)Google Scholar

Brownlie, I., Principles of Public International Law 6th ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003)Google Scholar

Brownlie, I., Principles of Public International Law 7th ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008)Google Scholar

Bryman, A., Social Research Methods 4th ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012)Google Scholar

Cannizzaro, E., Palchetti, P. and Wessel, R. A., International Law as Law of the European Union (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2012)Google Scholar

Chemerinsky, E., Constitutional Law: Principles and Policies 3rd ed. (New York: Aspen Publishers, 2006)Google Scholar

Chernow, R., Alexander Hamilton (New York: Penguin Press, 2004)Google Scholar

Chryssochoou, D. N., Theorizing European Integration (London: SAGE Publications, 2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chuchaev, A. I., Pravovoe obespechenie integratsionnykh protsessov v ramkakh Evraziiskogo ekonomicheskogo soiuza (Moscow: Prospekt, 2017)Google Scholar

Chufrin, G. I., Ocherki evraziiskoi integratsii (Moscow: Ves’ mir, 2013)Google Scholar

Conant, L. J., Justice Contained: Law and Politics in the European Union (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2002)Google Scholar

Connolly, W. E., The Terms of Political Discourse 3rd ed. (Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1993)Google Scholar

Constantinesco, V., Compétences et pouvoirs dans les Communautés européennes. Contribution à l’étude de la nature juridique des Communautés (Paris: Librairie générale de droit et de jurisprudence, 1974)Google Scholar

Craig, P. P., The Lisbon Treaty: Law, Politics, and Treaty Reform (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Craig, P. P. and De Búrca, G., EU Law: Text, Cases, and Materials 5th ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011)Google Scholar

Crawford, J. and Brownlie, I., Brownlie’s Principles of Public International Law 8th ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012)Google Scholar

Dmitriev, Y. A., Kostitutsiia Rossiiskoi Federatsii. Doktrinal’nyi kommentarii (Moscow: Delovoi dvor, 2009)Google Scholar

Dragneva, R. and Wolczuk, K., Eurasian Economic Integration: Law, Policy and Politics (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2013)Google Scholar

Dutkiewicz, P. and Sakwa, R., Eurasian Integration: The View from Within (London: Routledge, 2014)Google Scholar

Dworkin, G., The Theory and Practice of Autonomy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988)Google Scholar

Dworkin, R., Taking Rights Seriously (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1977)Google Scholar

Eeckhout, P., EU External Relations Law 2nd ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011)Google Scholar

Van Elsuwege, P., From Soviet Republics to EU Member States: A Legal and Political Assessment of the Baltic States’ Accession to the EU (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2008)Google Scholar

Engstad, N. A., Frøseth, A. L. and Tønder, B., The Independence of Judges (The Hague: Eleven International Publishing, 2014)Google Scholar

Engström, V., Constructing the Powers of International Institutions (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2012)Google Scholar

Friedmann, W., The Changing Structure of International Law (New York: Columbia University Press, 1964)Google Scholar

Glazyev, S. Y., Chushkin, V. I. and Tkachuk, S. P., Evropeiskii Soiuz i Evraziiskoe ekonomicheskoe soobshchestvo: skhodstvo i razlichie protsessov integratsionnogo stroitelstva (Moscow: Viktor Media, 2013)Google Scholar

Glotov, S. A., Grigoriev, I. A., Gubin, A. N. and Al, E., Pravo Evraziiskogo ekonomicheskogo soiuza: teoriia i praktika (Moscow: Galleia-Print, 2016)Google Scholar

Hamilton, A., Madison, J., Jay, J. and Goldman, L., The Federalist Papers (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008)Google Scholar

Hart, H. L. A., The Concept of Law 2nd ed. (Oxford: Clarendon Press; Oxford University Press, 1994)Google Scholar

Hartley, T. C., The Foundations of European Union Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010)Google Scholar

Hay, P., Federalism and Supranational Organisations: Patterns for New Legal Structures (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1966)Google Scholar

Heisenberg, W. and Davies, P. C. W., Physics and Philosophy: The Revolution in Modern Science (London: Penguin, 2000)Google Scholar

Hernández, G. I., The International Court of Justice and the Judicial Function (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014)Google Scholar

Hillion, C. and Koutrakos, P., Mixed Agreements Revisited: The EU and Its Member States in the World (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2010)Google Scholar

Homer, and Fitzgerald, R., The Odyssey (London: Collins Harvill, 1988)Google Scholar

Homer, and Murray, A. T., The Odyssey (New York: Heinemann; G.P. Putnam’s Sons, 1919)Google Scholar

Hudson, M. O., The Permanent Court of International Justice: A Treatise (New York: Macmillan, 1934)Google Scholar

Hurley, S. L., Natural Reasons: Personality and Polity (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989)Google Scholar

Jefferson, T. and Randolph, T. J., Memoir, Correspondence, and Miscellanies, from the Papers of Thomas Jefferson 2d America ed. (New York: Gray and Bowen, 1830)Google Scholar

Kalinichenko, P. A., Kashkin, S. Y., Kozheurov, Y. S., Moiseev, E. G., Slepak, V. Y. and Chetverikov, A. O., Integratsionnoe pravosudie: sushchnost’ i perspectivy (Moscow: Norma; Infra-M, 2014)Google Scholar

Kant, I., Guyer, P. and Wood, A. W., Critique of Pure Reason (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003)Google Scholar

Kashirkina, A. A. and Morozov, A. N., Mezhdunarodno-pravovye modeli Evropeiskogo soiuza i Tamozhennogo soiuza: sravnitelnyi analiz (Moscow: INFRA-M, 2012)Google Scholar

Kashkin, S. Y., Integratsionnoe pravo (Moscow: Prospekt, 2017)Google Scholar

Kashkin, S. Y. and Chetverikov, A. O., Osnovy integratsionnogo prava (Moscow: Prospekt, 2014)Google Scholar

Kashkin, S. Y. and Chetverikov, A. O., Integratsionnoe pravosudie v sovremennom mire: osnovnye modeli (Moscow: Norma; Infra-M, 2014)Google Scholar

Kashkin, S. Y. and Chetverikov, A. O., Pravo Evraziiskogo ekonomicheskogo soiuza (Moscow: Prospekt, 2021)Google Scholar

Kashkin, S. Y., Chetverikov, A. O., Kalinichenko, P. A., Slepak, V. Y. and Zhbankov, V. A., Integratsionnoe pravo v sovremennom mire: sravnitel’no-pravovoe issledovanie (Moscow: Prospekt, 2017)Google Scholar

Kashkin, S. Y., Chetverikov, A. O., Zhbankov, V. A. and Slepak, V. Y., Osnovy pravovogo regulirovaniia integratsionnykh protsessov na postsovetskom prostranstve (Moscow: Norma, 2013)Google Scholar

Kashkin, S. Y. and Trubacheva, K. I., Novye tendentsii razvitiia integratsionnogo i evropeiskogo prava (Moscow: Iustitsiia, 2016)Google Scholar

Kellermann, A. E., Albi, A., Czuczai, J., Blockmans, S. and Douma, W. T. (eds.), The Impact of EU Accession on the Legal Orders of New EU Member States and (Pre-) Candidate Countries: Hopes and Fears (The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2006)Google Scholar

Kelsen, H., Law and Peace in International Relations: The Oliver Wendell Holmes Lectures, 1940–41 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1942)Google Scholar

Kembayev, Z., Legal Aspects of the Regional Integration Processes in the Post-Soviet Area (Heidelberg: Springer, 2009)Google Scholar

Klabbers, J., An Introduction to International Institutional Law 2nd ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009)Google Scholar

Klamert, M., The Principle of Loyalty in EU Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014)Google Scholar

Konstadinides, T., Division of Powers in European Union Law: The Delimitation of Internal Competences between the EU and the Member States (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2009)Google Scholar

Korenica, F., The EU Accession to the ECHR: Between Luxembourg’s Search for Autonomy and Strasbourg’s Credibility on Human Rights Protection (Cham: Springer, 2015)Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, M., From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of International Legal Argument (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005)Google Scholar

Kuijper, P. J., Wouters, J., Hoffmeister, F., de Baere, G. and Ramopoulos, T., The Law of EU External Relations: Cases, Materials, and Commentary on the EU as an International Legal Actor (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013)Google Scholar

Kurbanov, R. A., Evraziiskoe pravo: teoreticheskie osnovy (UNITI-DANA, 2015)Google Scholar

Kurbanov, R. A., Evraziiskaia integratsiia i pravo (UNITY-DANA, 2016)Google Scholar

L’Estrange Fawcett, L. and Hurrell, A., Regionalism in World Politics: Regional Organization and International Order (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995)Google Scholar

Lagutina, M., Regional Integration and Future Cooperation Initiatives in the Eurasian Economic Union (Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 2019)Google Scholar

Lauterpacht, H., The Development of International Law by the International Court (London: Stevens, 1958)Google Scholar

Leuffen, D., Rittberger, B. and Schimmelfennig, F., Differentiated Integration: Explaining Variation in the European Union (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013)Google Scholar

Libman, A. and Vinokurov, E., 20 Years of Post-Soviet Integration: Holding-Together Regionalism (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012)Google Scholar

Lock, T., The European Court of Justice and International Courts (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015)Google Scholar

De Lombaerde, P., Indicator-Based Monitoring of Regional Economic Integration (Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2017)Google Scholar

Van der Loo, G., The EU-Ukraine Association Agreement and Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area: A New Legal Instrument for EU Integration without Membership (Leiden: Brill Nijhoff, 2016)Google Scholar

Lukianova, V. Y., Pravovye problemy formirovaniia mezhgosudarstvennykh ob”edinenii (na primere Zony svobodnoi torgovli i Tamozhennogo soiuza EvrAzES) (Moscow: Ankil, 2012)Google Scholar

Mallarmé, S., Œuvres complètes (Paris: Bibliothèque de la Pléiade, 2003), vol. iiGoogle Scholar

Marochkin, S. Y., Deistvie i realizatsiia norm mezhdunarodnogo prava v pravovoi sisteme Rossiiskoi Federatsii (Moscow: Norma; Infra-M, 2011)Google Scholar

Martin Martinez, M. M., National Sovereignty and International Organizations (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1996)Google Scholar

Marx, K. and De Leon, D., The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte (New York and Berlin: Mondial, 2005)Google Scholar

Micklitz, H.-W. and de Witte, B., The European Court of Justice and the Autonomy of the Member States (Cambridge, UK and Portland, OR: Intersentia, 2012)Google Scholar

Mokrov, G. G., Evraziiskii ekonomicheskii soiuz: instrumenty zashchity vnutrennego rynka ot nedobrosovestnoi konkurencii (Moscow: Prospekt, 2016)Google Scholar

Montesquieu, C. de S., De l’esprit des loix (Amsterdam: Chatelain, 1749)Google Scholar

Mukhametdinov, M., The Eurasian Economic Union and Integration Theory (Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2020)Google Scholar

Neshataeva, T. N., Diyachenko, E. B. and Myslivsky, P. P., Evraziiskaia integratsiia: rol’ suda (Moscow: Statut, 2015)Google Scholar

Newbold, S. P., All but Forgotten: Thomas Jefferson and the Development of Public Administration (Albany: State University of New York Press, 2010)Google Scholar

Orakhelashvili, A., Peremptory Norms in International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008)Google Scholar

Ott, A. and de Witte, B., Between Flexibility and Disintegration: The Trajectory of Differentiation in EU Law (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2017)Google Scholar

Pelkmans, J., European Integration: Methods and Economic Analysis 3rd ed. (Harlow: Financial Times and Prentice Hall, 2006)Google Scholar

Pescatore, P., Cours d’institutions internationales (Liege: Presses Universitaires, 1978)Google Scholar

Pliakhimovich, I. I., Kommentarii k Konstitutsii Respubliki Belarus’ (Minsk: Amalfea, 2015), vol. iGoogle Scholar

Ponomareva, K. A., Nalogovoe pravo integratsionnykh ob”edinenii: opyt Evropeiskogo soiuza i Evraziiskogo ekonomicheskogo soiuza (Omsk: Izdatel’stvo Omskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2016)Google Scholar

Ponomareva, K. A., Pravovoe regulirovanie nalogooblozheniia pribyli i dokhodov v Evropeiskom soiuze, Evraziiskom ekonomicheskom soiuze i Rossiiskoi Federatsii (Moscow: Infotropik Media, 2017)Google Scholar

Pulkowski, D., The Law and Politics of International Regime Conflict (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014)Google Scholar

Ravenhill, J., Global Political Economy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008)Google Scholar

Reinalda, B. and Verbeek, B., Autonomous Policy Making by International Organizations (London: Routledge, 1998)Google Scholar

Reinisch, A., Essentials of EU Law 2nd ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012)Google Scholar

Reuter, P., Institutions et relations internationales (Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 1988)Google Scholar

Rubinelli, S. and Levene, D. S., Ars Topica: The Classical Technique of Constructing Arguments from Aristotle to Cicero (Dordrecht: Springer, 2009)Google Scholar

Rudden, B., Basic Community Cases (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987)Google Scholar

Ryle, G., The Concept of Mind (London: Hutchinson, 1949)Google Scholar

Saramago, J., The Double (London: Harvill, 2004)Google Scholar

Sarooshi, D., International Organizations and Their Exercise of Sovereign Powers (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005)Google Scholar

Saurugger, S., Théories et concepts de l’intégration européenne (Paris: Sciences Po les Presses, 2010)Google Scholar

Savenkov, A. N., Chaika, K. L., Diyachenko, E. B. and Entin, K. V., Sud Evraziiskogo ekonomicheskogo soiuza i stanovleniie prava EAES (Moscow: Prospekt, 2021)Google Scholar

Schermers, H. G. and Blokker, N. M., International Institutional Law: Unity within Diversity 4th rev. ed. (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2003)Google Scholar

Schermers, H. G. and Blokker, N. M., International Institutional Law 5th ed. (Leiden: Brill, 2011)Google Scholar

Schwarzenberger, G., International Law 3rd ed. (London: Stevens & Sons, 1957)Google Scholar

Seyersted, F., Common Law of International Organizations (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2008)Google Scholar

Shamakhov, V. A., Kirilenko, V. P. and Kashkin, S. Y., Mezhdunarodnaia integratsiia i integratsionnoe pravo (Saint Petersburg: IPTs SZIU, 2017)Google Scholar

Shany, Y., The Competing Jurisdictions of International Courts and Tribunals (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003)Google Scholar

Shaw, M. N., International Law 6th ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008)Google Scholar

Söderbaum, F. and Shaw, T. M., Theories of New Regionalism (Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003)Google Scholar

Starodubtsev, S. V., Sistema tamozhennogo prava Evraziiskogo ekonomicheskogo soiuza (Moscow: EAAN, 2015)Google Scholar

Thucydides, R. Crawley and Wick, T. E., The Peloponnesian War 1st ed. (New York: Modern Library, 1982)Google Scholar

Tunkin, G. I., Theory of International Law (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1974)Google Scholar

Türk, A., Judicial Review in EU Law (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2009)Google Scholar

Tyson, L., Critical Theory Today: A User-Friendly Guide 2nd ed. (New York: Routledge, 2006)Google Scholar

Vasilevich, G. A., Kostitutsionnoe pravo (Minsk: Registr, 2012)Google Scholar

Vasilevich, G. A., Konstitutsionnye osnovy implementatsii mezhdunarodnykh dogovorov Respubliki Belarus’ i norm integratsionnogo prava (Minsk: Pravo i ekonomika, 2015)Google Scholar

Veliaminov, G. M., Mezhdunarodnoe ekonomicheskoe pravo i protsess (Moscow: Wolters Kluwer, 2014)Google Scholar

Viehweg, T. and Durham, W. C., Topics and Law: A Contribution to Basic Research in Law (Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 1993)Google Scholar

Vinokurov, E., Introduction to the Eurasian Economic Union (Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018)Google Scholar

Vinokurov, E. Y. and Libman, A. M., Evraziiskaia kontinental’naia integratsiia (Saint Petersburg: Centre for Integration Studies, Eurasian Development Bank, 2012)Google Scholar

Volcansek, M. L., Judicial Politics and Policy-Making in Western Europe (London: Cass, 1992)Google Scholar

Vymyatina, Y. and Antonova, D., Creating a Eurasian Union: Economic Integration of the Former Soviet Republics (New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, 2014)Google Scholar

Wessel, R. A. and Blockmans, S., Between Autonomy and Dependence: The EU Legal Order under the Influence of International Organisations (The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press; Springer, 2013)Google Scholar

White, N. D., The Law of International Organisations 2nd ed. (Manchester: Manchester University Press and Juris Publ., 2005)Google Scholar

Wiener, A. and Diez, T., European Integration Theory 2nd ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009)Google Scholar

Witte, B. de, Hanf, D. and Vos, E. (eds.), The Many Faces of Differentiation in EU Law (Cambridge, UK and Portland, OR: Intersentia, 2001)Google Scholar

Zhurova, A. V, Torgovlia uslugami v Evraziiskom ekonomicheskom soiuze (Moscow: Prospekt, 2016)Google Scholar

Albors-Llorens, A., ‘Judicial Protection before the Court of Justice of the European Union’ in Barnard, C., Peers, S. (eds.), European Union Law, 262–309 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017)Google Scholar

Arnull, A., ‘Judicial Activism and the European Court of Justice: How Should Academics Respond?’ in Dawson, M., DeWitte, B. and Muir, E. (eds.), Judicial Activism at the European Court of Justice, 211–32 (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd, 2013)Google Scholar

Bentham, J., ‘Extracts from Bentham’s Memorandum Book, 1818–19’ in Bowring, J. (ed.), The Works of Jeremy Bentham (New York: Russell & Russell, 1962)Google Scholar

Bobek, M., ‘Direct Effects of EU Law in the National Legal Systems’ in Barnard, C. and Peers, S. (eds.), European Union law, 143–76 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017)Google Scholar

Bogdandy, A. and Bast, J., ‘The Federal Order of Competences’ in von Bogdandy, A. and Bast, J. (eds.), Principles of European Constitutional Law, 275–307 (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2010)Google Scholar

Boisson de Chazournes, L., ‘Advisory Opinions and the Furtherance of the Common Interest of Mankind’ in Boisson de Chazournes, L., Romano, C. P. R. and Mackenzi, R. (eds.), International Organizations and International Dispute Settlement: Trends and Prospects, 105–18 (Brill: Nijhoff, 2002)Google Scholar

Brown, G. W., ‘The Idea of Autonomy: Accountability, Self-Determinism and What Normative Claims about Institutional Autonomy in Global Governance Should Mean’ in Collins, R. and White, N. D. (eds.), International Organizations and the Idea of Autonomy, 104–19 (London: Routledge, 2011)Google Scholar

Byron, D. and Malcolm, C., ‘Caribbean Court of Justice (CCJ)’ in The Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford University Press, 2009)Google Scholar

Capps, P., ‘Autonomy in Kant’s philosophy of International Law’ in Collins, R. and White, N. D. (eds.), International Organizations and the Idea of Autonomy, 48–62 (London: Routledge, 2011)Google Scholar

Claes, M. and de Visser, M., ‘The Court of Justice as a Federal Constitutional Court: A Comparative Perspective’ in Cloots, E., de Baere, G. and Sottiaux, S. (eds.), Federalism in the European Union, 83–109 (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2012)Google Scholar

Cremona, M., ‘Defining Competence in EU External Relations: Lessons from the Treaty Reform Process’ in Dashwood, A. and Maresceau, M. (eds.), Law and Practice of EU External Relations: Salient Features of a Changing Landscape, 34–69 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008)Google Scholar

Cremona, M., ‘External Relations and External Competence of the European Union: The Emergence of an Integrated Policy’ in Craig, P. and de Búrca, G. (eds.), The Evolution of EU Law, 217–68 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011)Google Scholar

Curtin, D. M. and Dekker, I. F., ‘The European Union from Maastricht to Lisbon: Institutional and Legal Unity out of the Shadows’ in Craig, P. and De Búrca, G. (eds.), The Evolution of EU Law, 155–86 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011)Google Scholar

d’Aspremont, J., ‘The Multifaceted Concept of the Autonomy of International Organizations and International Legal Discourse’ in Collins, R. and White, N. D. (eds.), International Organizations and the Idea of Autonomy: Institutional Independence in the International Legal Order, 63–86 (London: Routledge, 2011)Google Scholar

Dashwood, A., ‘Article 308 EC as the Outer Limit of Expressly Conferred Community Competence’ in Barnard, C. and Odudu, O. (eds.), The Outer Limits of European Law, 35–44 (Portland: Hart Publishing, 2009)Google Scholar

Deikalo, E. A., ‘Vliianie sotsiokulturnogo konteksta postsovetskogo prostranstva na razvitie mezhdunarodnogo regional’nogo pravosudiia’ in Mikhaliova, T. N. (ed.), Mezhdunarodnoe pravosudie v XXI veke, 230–61 (Minsk: Biznesofset, 2016)Google Scholar

Deikalo, E. A., ‘Tselepolaganie v evraziiskoi ekonomicheskoi integratsii kak ramka ee razvitiia’ in Rusakovich, A. V. (ed.), Evraziiskii ekonomicheskii soiuz: promezhutochnye itogi i perspektivy razvitiia integratsionnogo proekta, 27–31 (Minsk: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, 2017)Google Scholar

Dragneva, R., ‘The Eurasian Economic Union: Balancing Sovereignty and Integration’ in Petrov, R. and Van Elsuwege, P. (eds.), Post-Soviet Constitutions and Challenges of Regional Integration: Adapting to European and Eurasian Integration Projects, 48–70 (London: Routledge, 2018)Google Scholar

Dubout, E., ‘La relativité de la distinction des norms du droit de l’Union européenne et du droit international’ in Burgorgue-Larsen, L., Dubout, E., Maitrot de la Motte, A. and Touzé, S. (eds.), Les interactions normatives. Droit de l’Union européenne et droit international, 17–51 (Paris: Editions A. Pedone, 2012)Google Scholar

Dutkiewicz, P., ‘Introduction: Eu-Ru-Asian integration?’ in Dutkiewicz, P. and Sakwa, R. (eds.), Eurasian Integration: The View from Within, 1–11 (London: Routledge, 2014)Google Scholar

Eckes, C., ‘International Law as Law of the EU: The Role of the European Court of Justice’ in Cannizzaro, E., Palchetti, P. and Wessel, R. A. (eds.), International Law as Law of the European Union, 353–78 (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2012)Google Scholar

Engström, V., ‘Powers of Organizations and the Many Faces of Autonomy’ in Collins, R. and White, N. D. (eds.), International Organizations and the Idea of Autonomy: Institutional Independence in the International Legal Order, 213–29 (London: Routledge, 2011)Google Scholar

Feinberg, J., ‘Autonomy’ in Christman, J. (ed.), The Inner Citadel: Essays on Individual Autonomy, 27–53 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1989)Google Scholar

Gazzini, T., ‘The Relationship between International Legal Personality and the Autonomy of International Organizations’ in Collins, R. and White, N. D. (eds.), International Organizations and the Idea of Autonomy: Institutional Independence in the International Legal Order, 196–212 (London: Routledge, 2011)Google Scholar

Ghazaryan, N. and Delcour, L., ‘From EU Integration Process to the Eurasian Economic Union: The Case of Armenia’ in Petrov, R. and Van Elsuwege, P. (eds.), Post-Soviet Constitutions and Challenges of Regional Integration: Adapting to European and Eurasian Integration Projects, 131–52 (London: Routledge, 2018)Google Scholar

Govaere, I., ‘External Competence: What’s in a Name? The Difficult Conciliation between Dynamism of the ECJ and Dynamics of European Integration’ in Demaret, P., Govaere, I. and Hanf, D. (eds.), European Legal Dynamics/Dynamiques juridiques européennes, 14–23 (Bruges: P.I.E., 2007)Google Scholar

Hamilton, A., ‘The Federalist, 78: A View on the Constitution of the Judicial Department in Relation to the Tenure of Good Behaviour’ in Hamilton, A., Madison, J., Jay, J. and Goldman, L. (eds.), The Federalist Papers, 379–85 (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2008)Google Scholar

Hartley, T. C., ‘National Law, International Law and EU Law: How Do They Relate?’ in Capps, P., Evans, M. D. and Konstadinidis, S. V. (eds.), Asserting Jurisdiction: International and European Legal Perspectives, 65–82 (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2003)Google Scholar

Hindelang, S., ‘The Autonomy of the European Legal Order: EU Constitutional Limits to Investor-State Arbitration on the Basis of Future EU Investment-Related Agreements’ in Bungenberg, M. and Herrmann, C. (eds.), Common Commercial Policy after Lisbon: Special Issue, 187–98 (Heidelberg: Springer, 2013)Google Scholar

Jacobs, F. G., ‘Is the Court of Justice of the European Communities a Constitutional Court?’ in Curtin, D. and O’Keeffe, D. (eds.), Constitutional Adjudication in European Community and National Law, 25–32 (Dublin: Butterworth, 1992)Google Scholar

Jacqué, J. P., ‘Lost in Transition: The European Commission between Intergovernmentalism and Integration’ in Ritleng, D. (ed.), Independence and Legitimacy in the Institutional System of the European Union, 15–56 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016)Google Scholar

Kalinichenko, P., ‘The Constitutional Order of the Russian Federation and Its Adaptability to European and Eurasian Integration Projects’ in Petrov, R. and Van Elsuwege, P. (eds.), Post-Soviet Constitutions and Challenges of Regional Integration: Adapting to European and Eurasian integration projects, 168–81 (London: Routledge, 2018)Google Scholar

Karliuk, M., ‘The Limits of the Judiciary within the Eurasian Integration Process’ in Di Gregorio, A. and Angeli, A. (eds.), The Eurasian Economic Union and the European Union: Moving toward a Greater Understanding, 171–83 (The Hague, the Netherlands: Eleven International Publishing, 2016)Google Scholar

Karliuk, M., ‘The Constitutional Order of Belarus and Its Adaptability to the Eurasian Economic Union: A “Living Constitution” Workaround’ in Petrov, R. and Van Elsuwege, P. (eds.), Post-Soviet Constitutions and Challenges of Regional Integration: Adapting to European and Eurasian Integration Projects, 153–67 (London: Routledge, 2018)Google Scholar

Karliuk, M., ‘The Influence of CJEU Judgments on the Legal Order of the Eurasian Economic Union’ in Reich, A. and Micklitz, H.-W. (eds.), The Impact of the European Court of Justice on Neighbouring Countries, 54–77 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020)Google Scholar

Klabbers, J., ‘Autonomy, Constitutionalism and Virtue in International Institutional Law’ in Collins, R. and White, N. D. (eds.), International Organizations and the Idea of Autonomy, 120–40 (London: Routledge, 2011)Google Scholar

Klabbers, J., ‘Völkerrechtsfreundlichkeit? International Law and the EU Legal Order’ in Koutrakos, P. (ed.), European Foreign Policy, 95–114 (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2011)Google Scholar

Klabbers, J., ‘Sui Generis? The European Union as an International Organization’ in Patterson, D. and Södersten, A. (eds.), A Companion to European Union Law and International Law, 1–15 (Oxford: John Wiley & Sons, 2016)Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, M., ‘What Is International Law For?’ in Evans, M. (ed.), International Law, 32–57 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010)Google Scholar

Lavranos, N., ‘Designing an International Investor-to-State Arbitration System after Opinion 1/09’ in Bungenberg, M. and Herrmann, C. (eds.), Common Commercial Policy after Lisbon: Special Issue, 199–219 (Heidelberg: Springer, 2013)Google Scholar

Mackenzie, R. and Sands, P., ‘Judicial Selection for International Courts: Towards Common Principles and Practices’ in Malleson, K. and Russell, P. (eds.), Appointing Judges in an Age of Judicial Power: Critical Perspectives from Around the World, 213–37 (Toronto, Buffalo and London: University of Toronto Press, 2006)Google Scholar

Mengozzi, P., ‘The EC External Competencies: From the ERTA Case to the Opinion in the Lugano Convention’ in Poiares Maduro, M. and Azoulai, L. (eds.), The Past and Future of EU Law, 213–17 (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2010)Google Scholar

McNaughton, A., ‘Acts of Creation: The ERTA Decision as a Foundation Stone of the EU Legal System’ in Nicola, F. and Davies, B. (eds.), EU Law Stories: Contextual and Critical Histories of European Jurisprudence, 134–54 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017)Google Scholar

Odermatt, J., ‘Principle of Autonomy in EU External Relations’ in Garben, S. and Govaere, I. (eds.), The Division of Competences between the EU and the Member States, 291–316 (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2017)Google Scholar

Pavlova, L. V., ‘Osobennosti zakonotvorchestva Respubliki Belarus’ v oblasti zakliucheniia mezhdunarodnykh dogovorov’ in Babkina, E. V. and Lepeshkov, Y. A. (eds.), Aktualnyie problemy mezhdunarodnogo publichnogo i mezhdunarodnogo chastnogo prava, 102–11 (Minsk: BGU, 2009)Google Scholar

Pavlova, L. V., ‘Rol’ mezhdunarodnogo prava kak reguliatora mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii v usloviiakh globalizatsii’ in Babkina, E. V. and Lepeshkov, Y. A. (eds.), Aktualnyie problemy mezhdunarodnogo publichnogo i mezhdunarodnogo chastnogo prava, 76–85 (Minsk: BGU, 2011)Google Scholar

Pernice, I., ‘Costa v ENEL and Simmenthal: Primacy of European Law’ in Poiares Maduro, M. and Azoulai, L. (eds.), The Past and Future of EU Law, 47–48 (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2010)Google Scholar

Pernice, I., ‘The Autonomy of the EU Legal Order: Fifty Years after Van Gend’ in Tizzano, A., Kokott, J. and Prechal, S. (eds.), 50ème Anniversaire de l’arrêt/50th Anniversary of the Judgment in Van Gen den Loos, 1963–2013, 55–80 (Luxembourg: Office des publications de l’Union européenne, 2013)Google Scholar

Pescatore, P., ‘Les Objectifs de la Communauté européenne comme principe d’interprétation dans la jurisprudence de la Cour de Justice’ in Miscellanea W. J. Ganshof van der Meersch, 325–63 (Bruxelles: E. Bruylant, 1972)Google Scholar

Podberezkin, A. and Podberezkina, O., ‘Eurasianism as an Idea, Civilizational Concept and Integration Challenge’ in Dutkiewicz, P. and Sakwa, R. (eds.), Eurasian Integration: The View from Within, 46–61 (London: Routledge, 2014)Google Scholar

Puchala, D. J. and Hopkins, R. F., ‘International Regimes: Lessons from Inductive Analysis’ in Krasner, S. D. (ed.), International Regimes, 61–92 (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1983)Google Scholar

Ravenhill, J., ‘Regionalism’ in Ravenhill, J. (ed.), Global Political Economy, 172–209 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008)Google Scholar

Rovetta, D., ‘Investment Arbitration in the EU after Lisbon: Selected Procedural and Jurisdictional Issues’ in Bungenberg, M. and Herrmann, C. (eds.), Common Commercial Policy after Lisbon: Special Issue, 221–33 (Heidelberg: Springer, 2018)Google Scholar

Sakwa, R., ‘Challenges of Eurasian integration’ in Dutkiewicz, P. and Sakwa, R. (eds.), Eurasian Integration: The View from Within, 12–30 (Abingdon: Routledge, 2015)Google Scholar

Schepel, H. and Blankenburg, E., ‘Mobilizing the European Court of Justice’ in Weiler, J. H. H. and de Búrca, G. (eds.), European Court of Justice, 28–41 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001)Google Scholar

Schimmelfennig, F., ‘Regional Integration Theory’ in Thompson, William R. (ed.), Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018)Google Scholar

Schroeder, W. and Müller, A. T., ‘Elements of Supranationality in the Law of International Organizations’ in Fastenrath, U., Geiger, R., Khan, D.-E., Paulus, A., von Schorlemer, S. and Vedder, C. (eds.), From Bilateralism to Community Interest: Essays in Honour of Bruno Simma, 358–78 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011)Google Scholar

Sharpston, E. and De Baere, G., ‘The Court of Justice as a Constitutional Adjudicator’ in Arnull, A., Barnard, C., Dougan, M. and Spaventa, E. (eds.), A Constitutional Order of States? Essays in EU Law in Honour of Alan Dashwood, 123–50 (Oxford and Portland, Oregon: Hart Publishing, 2011)Google Scholar

Snell, J., ‘The Internal Market and the Philosophies of Market Integration’ in Barnard, C. and Peers, S. (eds.), European Union Law, 310–38 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017)Google Scholar

Tikhomirov, Y. A., ‘Tseli i formy gosudarstvenno-pravovoi integratsii’ in Tikhomirov, Y. A. and Lafitskii, V. I. (eds.), Pravovoe obespechenie mezhgosudarstvennoi integratsii (Moscow: Olita, 2005)Google Scholar

Tizzano, A., ‘The Powers of the Community’, in European Commission, Thirty Years of Community Law, 43–67 (Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 1983)Google Scholar

Tsagourias, N., ‘Conceptualizing the Autonomy of the European Union’ in Collins, R. and White, N. D. (eds.), International Organizations and the Idea of Autonomy: Institutional Independence in the International Legal Order, 339–52 (London: Routledge, 2011)Google Scholar

Visscher, P. De, ‘La Communauté européenne du charbon et de l’acier et les Etats membres’ in Actes officiels du congress international d’études sur la communauté européenne du charbon et de l’acier (Milan: Giuffrè, 1957)Google Scholar

Weiler, J. H. H. and Haltern, U. R., ‘Constitutional or International? The Foundations of the Community Legal Order and the Question of Judicial Kompetenz-Kompetenz’ in Slaughter, A.-M., Sweet, A. S. and Weiler, J. H. H. (eds.), The European Courts and National Courts: Doctrine and Jurisprudence, 331–64 (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1998)Google Scholar

Witte, B. de, ‘Direct Effect, Supremacy and the Nature of the Legal Order’ in Craig, P. P. and De Búrca, G. (eds.), The Evolution of EU Law, 323–62 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011)Google Scholar

Witte, B. de, ‘A Selfish Court? The Court of Justice and the Design of International Dispute Settlement beyond the European Union’ in Cremona, M., Thies, A. and Wessel, R. A. (eds.), The European Union and International Dispute Settlement, 33–46 (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2017)Google Scholar

Abdulloev, F. A., ‘Razreshenie sporov v ramkakh SNG i EvrAzES sposobstvuet integratsionnym protsessam’ (2010) (8) Evraziiskaia integratsiia: ekonomika, pravo, politika 36–39Google Scholar

Alder, J., ‘Dissents in Courts of Last Resort: Tragic Choices?’ (2000) 20 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 221–46Google Scholar

Azanov, B. K., ‘Dogovor o Evraziiskom ekonomicheskom soiuze: kompleksnyi pravovoi analiz (Razdel I. Obschie polozheniia. Razdel II. Osnovnye printsipy, tseli, kompetentsiia i pravo Soiuza)’ (2014) (8) Evraziiskii iuridicheskii zhurnal 39–48Google Scholar

Baildinov, E. T., ‘Osobennosti sovremennogo evraziiskogo integratsionnogo pravoporiadka’ (2012) (10) Evraziiskii iuridicheskii zhurnal 18–23Google Scholar

Baildinov, E. T., ‘Dogovor of Evraziiskom ekonomicheskom soiuze: shag vpered, dva shaga nazad’ (2014) (10) Evraziiskii iuridicheskii zhurnal 25–33Google Scholar

Bailleux, J., ‘Comment l’Europe vint au droi. Le premier Congrèw international d’études de la CECA (Milan-Stresa 1957)’ (2010) 60 Revue française de science politique 295–318Google Scholar

Bailleux, J., ‘Michel Gaudet, A Law Entrepreneur: The Role of the Legal Service of the European Executives in the Invention of EC Law and the Birth of the Common Market Law Review’ (2013) 50 Common Market Law Review 359–67Google Scholar

Benvenisti, E. and Downs, G. W., ‘Prospects for the Increased Independence of International Tribunals’ (2011) 12 German Law Journal 1057–82Google Scholar

Bezborodov, Y. S., ‘Mezhdunarodno-pravovaia integratsia: podkhody k ponimaniiu fenomena’ (2012) (1) Rossiiskii iuridicheskii zhurnal 62–67Google Scholar

Bogdandy, A. and Venzke, I., ‘Beyond Dispute: International Judicial Institutions as Lawmakers’ (2011) 12 German Law Journal 979–1003Google Scholar

Bogdandy, A. and Venzke, I., ‘On the Democratic Legitimation of International Judicial Lawmaking’ (2011) 12 German Law Journal 1341–70Google Scholar

Brandom, R. B., ‘Some Pragmatist Themes in Hegel’s Idealism: Negotiation and Administration in Hegel’s Account of the Structure and Content of Conceptual Norms’ (1999) 7 European Journal of Philosophy 164–89Google Scholar

Broberg, M., ‘Acte Clair Revisited: Adapting the Acte Claire Criteria to the Demands of the Times’ (2008) 45 Common Market Law Review 1383–97Google Scholar

Burgstaller, M., ‘Investor-State Arbitration in EU International Investment Agreements with Third States’ (2012) 39 Legal Issues of Economic Integration 207–21Google Scholar

Chamon, M., ‘Implied Exclusive Powers in the ECJ’s Post-Lisbon Jurisprudence: The Continued Development of the ERTA Doctrine’ (2018) 55 Common Market Law Review 1101–42Google Scholar

Chirkin, V. E., ‘Nadnatsional’noe pravo: osnovnye osobennosti’ (2017) (2) Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava 131–37Google Scholar

Contartese, C., ‘The Autonomy of the EU Legal Order in the ECJ’s External Relations Case Law: From the “Essential” to the “Specific Characteristics” of the Union and Back Again’ (2017) 54 Common Market Law Review 1627–71Google Scholar

Cray, J. N., ‘On the Contestability of Social and Political Concepts’ (1977) 5 Political Theory 331–48Google Scholar

Czuczai, J., ‘The Autonomy of the EU Legal Order and the Law-Making Activities of International Organizations: Some Examples Regarding the Council Most Recent Practice’ (2012) 31 Yearbook of European Law 452–72Google Scholar

Diatlov, S. A. and Zverev, P. B., ‘Sovershenstvovanie organizatsionno-pravovogo mekhanizma formirovaniia Edinogo ekonomicheskogo prostranstva’ (2012) (1) Evraziiskaia integratsiia: ekonomika, pravo, politika 61–65Google Scholar

Diyachenko, E. and Entin, K., ‘The Court of the Eurasian Economic Union: Challenges and Perspectives’ (2017) 5 Russian Law Journal 53–74Google Scholar

Diyachenko, E. B. and Entin, K. V., ‘Kompetentsiia Suda Evraziiskogo ekonomicheskogo soiuza: mify i real’nost’ (2017) 3 (23) Mezhdunarodnoe pravosudie 76–95Google Scholar

Dupuy, P.-M., ‘A Doctrinal Debate in the Globalisation Era: On the “Fragmentation” of International Law’ (2007) 1 European Journal of Legal Studies 25–41Google Scholar

Eeckhout, P., ‘Human Rights and the Autonomy of EU Law: Pluralism or Integration?’ (2013) 66 Current Legal Problems 169–202Google Scholar

Eilmansberger, T., ‘The Relationship between Rights and Remedies in EC law: In Search of the Missing Link’ (2004) 41 Common Market Law Review 1199–246Google Scholar

Eilmansberger, T., ‘Bilateral Investment Treaties and EU law’ (2009) 46 Common Market Law Review 383–429Google Scholar

Van Elsuwege, P. and Chamon, M., ‘Die Benelux-Union: ein Laboratorium für eine erweiterte Integration’ (2014) I Enzyklopädie Europarecht Europäisches Organisations- und Verfassungsrecht 905–17Google Scholar

Evans, A. C., ‘The Enforcement Procedure of Article 169 EEC: Commission Discretion’ (1979) 4 European Law Review 442–56Google Scholar

Fennelly, N., ‘Legal Interpretation at the European Court of Justice’ (1996) 20 Fordham International Law Journal 656–79Google Scholar

Frankenberg, G., ‘Comparing Constitutions: Ideas, Ideals, and Ideology. Toward a Layered Narrative’ (2006) 4 Icon: International Journal of Constitutional Law 439–59Google Scholar

Gallie, W. B., ‘Essentially Contested Concepts’ (1956) 56 Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 167–98Google Scholar

Gallo, D. and Nicola, F. G., ‘The External Dimension of EU Investment Law: Jurisdictional Clashes and Transformative Adjudication’ (2016) 39 Fordham International Law Journal 1081–152Google Scholar

Gormley, L. W., ‘Competition and Free Movement: Is the Internal Market the Same as a Common Market?’ (2002) 13 European Business Law Review 517–22Google Scholar

Govaere, I., ‘“Setting the International Scene”: EU External Competence and Procedures post-Lisbon Revisited in the Light of ECJ Opinion 1/13’ (2015) 52 Common Market Law Review 1277–307Google Scholar

Hannum, H. and Lillich, R. B., ‘The Concept of Autonomy in International Law’ (1980) 74 The American Journal of International Law 858–89Google Scholar

Herrmann, C., ‘The Role of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Emerging EU Investment Policy’ (2014) 15 Journal of World Investment & Trade 570–84Google Scholar

Isiksel, T., ‘European Exceptionalism and the EU’s Accession to the ECHR’ (2016) 27 European Journal of International Law 565–89Google Scholar

Ispolinov, A. S., ‘First Judgments of the Court of the Eurasian Economic Community: Reviewing Private Rights in a New Regional Agreement’ (2013) 40 Legal Issues of Economic Integration 225–46Google Scholar

Ispolinov, A. S., ‘Naviazannyi monolog: pervoe preiuditsial’noe zakliuchenie Suda EvrAzES’ (2013) 8 (63) Evraziiskii juridicheskii zhurnal 21–30Google Scholar

Ispolinov, A. S., ‘Reshenie Bol’shoi Kollegii Suda EvrAzES po delu Iuzhnogo Kuzbassa: naskol’ko obosnovan sudeiskii aktivizm?’ (2013) 5 Evraziiskii iuridicheskii zhurnal 19–26Google Scholar

Ispolinov, A. S., ‘Status mezhdunarodnykh dogovorov v natsional’nom prave’ (2014) 1 (94) Rossiiskii iuridicheskii zhurnal 189–91Google Scholar

Ispolinov, A. S., ‘Chto skryvaetsia za broskim terminom “integratsionnoe pravosudie”’ (2017) (3) Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki 105–20Google Scholar

Jacob, M., ‘Precedents: Lawmaking through International Adjudication’ (2011) 12 German Law Journal 1005–32Google Scholar

Jacqué, J. P., ‘Pride and/or prejudice? Les lectures possibles de l’avis 2/13 de la Cour de justice’ (2015) 51 Cahiers de droit europeen 19–45Google Scholar

Jiang, P. and Villalta Puig, G., ‘Article 158(3) of the Hong Kong Basic Law and the Preliminary Reference Procedure of the European Union’ (2018) 19 Chicago Journal of International Law 1–29Google Scholar

Kalachyan, K. K., ‘Mezhdunarodno-pravovye problemy deiatelnosti EvrAzES’ (2004) (3) Gosudarstvo i pravo 58–63Google Scholar

Karliuk, M., ‘The Eurasian Economic Union: An EU-Inspired Legal Order and Its Limits’ (2017) 42 Review of Central and East European Law 50–72Google Scholar

Karliuk, M., ‘Russian Legal Order and the Legal Order of the Eurasian Economic Union: An Uneasy Relationship’ (2017) 5 Russian Law Journal 33–52Google Scholar

Kekes, K., ‘Essentially Contested Concepts: A Reconsideration’ (1977) 10 Philosophy and Rhetoric 71–89Google Scholar

Kelsen, H. and Paulson, S. L., ‘The Concept of the Legal Order’ (1982) 27 The American Journal of Jurisprudence 64–84Google Scholar

Kembayev, Z., ‘The Court of the Eurasian Economic Union: An Adequate Body for Facilitating Eurasian Integration?’ (2016) 41 Review of Central and East European Law 342–67Google Scholar

Kiiver, P., ‘The Lisbon Judgment of the German Constitutional Court: A Court-Ordered Strengthening of the National Legislature in the EU’ (2010) 16 European Law Journal 578–88Google Scholar

Kirchmair, L., ‘The “Janus Face” of the Court of Justice of the European Union: A Theoretical Appraisal of the EU Legal Order’s Relationship with International and Member State Law’ (2012) 4 Goettingen Journal of International Law 677–91Google Scholar

Komendantov, S. V, ‘K voprosu o vozmozhnosti mezhdunarodno-pravovykh posledstviiakh Tamozhennogo soiuza v ramkakh EvrAzES’ (2010) (7) Moskovskii zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava 61–71Google Scholar

Komendantov, S. V, ‘Mezhdunarodno-pravovye posledstviia sozdaniia Tamozhennogo soiuza v ramkakh EvrAzES’ (2010) (1) Rossiiskii vneshneekonomicheskii vestnik 37–42Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, M., ‘Constitutionalism as Mindset: Reflections on Kantian Themes about International Law and Globalization’ (2006) 8 Theoretical Inquiries in Law 9–36Google Scholar

Koutrakos, P., ‘The Autonomy of EU Law and International Investment Arbitration’ (2019) 88 Nordic Journal of International Law 41–64Google Scholar

Koutrakos, P., ‘More on Autonomy: Opinion 1/17 (CETA)’ (2019) 3 European Law Review 293–94Google Scholar

Kreuzbauer, G., ‘Topics in Contemporary Legal Argumentation: Some Remarks on the Topical Nature of Legal Argumentation in the Continental Law Tradition’ (2008) 28 Informal Logic 71–85Google Scholar

Kurbanov, R. A., ‘Evraziiskoe pravo: processy formirovaniia’ (2015) (9) Gosudarstvo i pravo 65–71Google Scholar

Ladeur, K.-H., ‘Towards a Legal Theory of Supranationality: The Viability of the Network Concept’ (1997) 3 European Law Journal 33–54Google Scholar

Lavranos, N., ‘Opinion 1/03, Lugano Convention’ (2006) 43 Common Market Law Review 1087–100Google Scholar

Lazowski, A., ‘European Union Do Not Worry, Croatia Is Behind You: A Commentary on the Seventh Accession Treaty’ (2012) 8 Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy 1–39Google Scholar

Lebeck, C., ‘Implied Powers beyond Functional Integration? The Flexibility Clause in the Revised EU Treaties’ (2008) 17 Journal of Transnational Law & Policy 308–62Google Scholar

Lock, T., ‘The Future of the European Union’s Accession to the European Convention on Human Rights after Opinion 2/13: Is It Still Possible and Is It Still Desirable?’ (2015) 11 European Constitutional Law Review 239–73Google Scholar

Van der Loo, G. and Van Elsuwege, P., ‘Competing Paths of Regional Economic Integration in the Post-Soviet Space’ (2012) 37 Review of Central and East European Law 421–47Google Scholar

Luhmann, N., ‘The World Society as a Social System’ (1982) 8 International Journal of General Systems 131–38Google Scholar

MacCormick, N., ‘The Maastricht-Urteil: Sovereignty Now’ (1995) 1 European Law Journal 259–66Google Scholar

Malinovskaya, V. M., ‘Pravovye i institutsional’nye osnovy funktsionirovaniia Evraziiskogo soiuza’ (2012) (4) Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta 198–203Google Scholar

Malinovskii, V. A., ‘Verkhovenstvo Konstitutsii Respubliki Kazakhstan v sfere mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii’ (2005) (42) Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipalnoe pravo 73–79Google Scholar

Mikhail, J., ‘The Necessary and Proper Clauses’ (2014) 102 Georgetown Law Journal 1045–132Google Scholar

Molnár, T., ‘The Concept of Autonomy of EU Law from the Comparative Perspective of International Law and the Legal Systems of Member States’ (2015) 3 Hungarian Yearbook of International Law and European Law 433–59Google Scholar

Neshataeva, T. N., ‘Integratsiia i nadnatsionalizm’ (2014) 9 (101) Rossiiskoe pravosudie 5–11Google Scholar

Neshataeva, T. N., ‘K voprosu o sozdanii Evraziiskogo soiuza: integratsiia i nadnatsionalizm’ (2014) (2) Mezhdunarodnoe pravosudie 57–70Google Scholar

Odermatt, J., ‘The Use of International Treaty Law by the Court of Justice of the European Union’ (2015) 17 Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 121–44Google Scholar

Oellers-Frahm, K., ‘Lawmaking through Advisory Opinions’ (2011) 12 German Law Journal 1033–56Google Scholar

Payandeh, M., ‘Constitutional Review of EU Law after Honeywell: Contextualizing the Relationship between the German Constitutional Court and the EU Court of Justice’ (2011) 48 Common Market Law Review 9–38Google Scholar

Peers, S., ‘The EU’s Accession to the ECHR: The Dream Becomes a Nightmare’ (2015) 16 German Law Journal 213–22Google Scholar

Petersen, N., ‘Lawmaking by the International Court of Justice: Factors of Success’ (2011) 12 German Law Journal 1295–316Google Scholar

Pirker, B. H. and Reitemeyer, S., ‘Between Discursive and Exclusive Autonomy: Opinion 2/13, the Protection of Fundamental Rights and the Autonomy of EU Law’ (2015) 17 Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 168–88Google Scholar

Rafaliuk, E. E., Zoloilo, M. V. and Vlasova, N. V., ‘Poniatiia, vidy i formy evraziiskogo i latinoamerikanskogo integratsionnykh ob’edinenii (sravnitel’no-pravovoi analiz)’ (2017) (1) Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava 154–68Google Scholar

Rasmussen, M., ‘Revolutionizing European Law: A History of the Van Gend en Loos Judgment’ (2014) 12 International Journal of Constitutional Law 136–63Google Scholar

Riffel, C., ‘The CETA Opinion of the European Court of Justice and Its Implications: Not that Selfish After All’ (2019) 22 Journal of International Economic Law 503–21Google Scholar

Rosas, A., ‘With a Little Help from My Friends: International Case-Law as a Source of Reference for EU Courts’ (2005) 5 (1) The Global Community Yearbook of International Law and Jurisprudence 217–29Google Scholar

Rosas, A., ‘The Status in EU Law of International Agreements Concluded by EU Member States’ (2011) 34 Fordham International Law Journal 1304–45Google Scholar

Sandholtz, W., ‘Dynamics of International Norm Change: Rules against Wartime Plunder’ (2008) 14 European Journal of International Relations 101–31Google Scholar

Schermers, H. G., ‘The Transformation of Europe: Comment’ (1991) 100 Yale Law Journal 2525–36Google Scholar

Schill, S. W., ‘Editorial: Opinion 2/13: The End for Dispute Settlement in EU Trade and Investment Agreements?’ (2015) 16 Journal of World Investment & Trade 379–88Google Scholar

Semertzi, A., ‘The Preclusion of Direct Effect in the Recently Concluded EU Free Trade Agreements’ (2014) 51 Common Market Law Review 1125–58Google Scholar

Shany, Y., ‘No Longer a Weak Department of Power? Reflections on the Emergence of a New International Judiciary’ (2009) 20 European Journal of International Law 73–91Google Scholar

Sharpston, E., ‘Transparency and Clear Legal Language in the European Union: Ambiguous Legislative Texts, Laconic Pronouncements and the Credibility of the Judicial System’ (2010) 12 Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 409–23Google Scholar

Shinkaretskaya, G. G., ‘Est’ li budushchee u EvrAzES?’ (2004) (11) Gosudarstvo i pravo 73–77Google Scholar

Shinkaretskaya, G. G., ‘Sud SNG – ne sudebnoie uchrezhdenie?’ (2005) (42) EZ-IuristGoogle Scholar

Simma, B., ‘Self-Contained Regimes’ (1985) 16 Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 111–36Google Scholar

Simma, B. and Pulkowski, D., ‘Of Planets and the Universe: Self-Contained Regimes in International Law’ (2006) 17 European Journal of International Law 483–529Google Scholar

Sliusar, N. B., ‘Institutsional’nye osnovy Tamozhennogo soiuza v ramkakh EvrAzES’ (2011) (1) Tamozhennoe delo 4–10Google Scholar

Sørensen, M., ‘Autonomous Legal Orders: Some Considerations Relating to a Systems Analysis of International Organisations in the World Legal Order’ (1983) 32 The International and Comparative Law Quarterly 559–76Google Scholar

Spartak, A. N., ‘Evraziiskaia ekonomicheskaia integratsiia – sostoiavshiisia i otrkytyi dlia shirokogo mezhdunarodnogo sotrudnichestva integratsionnyi proekt’ (2013) (1) Mezhdunarodnaia ekonomika 55–64Google Scholar

Stoiakin, S. G., ‘Mezhdunarodnaia integratsiia: poniatie, vidy, formy’ (2004) (3) Moskovskii zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava 17–30Google Scholar

Sweet, A. S. and Brunell, T., ‘The European Court of Justice, State Noncompliance, and the Politics of Override’ (2012) 106 American Political Science Review 204–13Google Scholar

Szurek, S., ‘Du particularisme à l’autonomie? Esquisse des rapports du droit international et du droit communautaire’ (2007) 5 Annuaire de droit européen 57–92Google Scholar

Tabary, J. C., ‘Hierarchy and Autonomy’ (1990) 18 International Journal of General Systems 241–50Google Scholar

Uwera, G., ‘Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) in Future EU Investment-Related Agreements: Is the Autonomy of the EU Legal Order an Obstacle?’ (2016) 15 Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals 102–51Google Scholar

Vasilevich, G. A. and Vasilevich, S. G., ‘O neposredstvennom deistvii aktov Evraziiskoi ekonomicheskoi komissii’ (2014) 10 (77) Evraziiskii iuridicheskii zhurnal 34–36Google Scholar

Vesterdorf, B., ‘A Constitutional Court for the EU?’ (2006) 4 Icon: International Journal of Constitutional Law 607–17Google Scholar

Vishniakov, V. G., ‘Pravovye problemy stanovleniia Evraziiskogo ekonomicheskogo soobshchestva’ (2001) (10) Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava 121–31Google Scholar

Waldron, J., ‘A Rights-Based Critique of Constitutional Rights’ (1993) 13 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 18–51Google Scholar

Waldron, J., ‘Is the Rule of Law an Essentially Contested Concept?’ (2002) 21 Law & Philosophy 137–64Google Scholar

Weiler, J. H. H., ‘The Transformation of Europe’ (1991) 100 Yale Law Journal 2403–83Google Scholar

Weiler, J. H. H., Haltern, U. R. and Mayer, F. C., ‘European Democracy and Its Critique’ (1995) 18 West European Politics 4–39Google Scholar

Wessel, R. A., ‘Revisiting the International Legal Status of the EU’ (2000) 5 European Foreign Affairs Review 507–37Google Scholar

White, N., ‘Separate but Connected: Inter-Governmental Organizations and International Law’ (2008) 5 International Organizations Law Review 175–95Google Scholar

Winter, J. A., ‘Direct Applicability and Direct Effect: Two Distinct and Different Concepts in Community Law’ (1972) 9 Common Market Law Review 425–38Google Scholar

Witte, B. de, ‘European Union Law: How Autonomous Is Its Legal Order?’ (2010) 65 Zeitschrift für öffentliches Recht 141–55Google Scholar

Witte, B. de and Imamovic, S., ‘Opinion 2/13 on Accession to the ECHR: Defending the EU Legal Order against a Foreign Human Rights Court’ (2015) 40 European Law Review 683–705Google Scholar

Zwaan, J. W. de, ‘The Legal Personality of the European Communities and the European Union’ (1999) 30 Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 75–113Google Scholar

Zybailo, A. I., ‘Mesto istochnikov prava EvrAzES v pravovykh sistemakh gosudarstv-chlenov’ (2013) (7) Evraziiskii iuridicheskii zhurnal 14–18Google Scholar

Barbuk, A. V, ‘Neposredstvennoe primenenie norm mezhdunarodnykh dogovorov v natsional’nykh pravovykh sistemakh’ Belarusian State University (BSU) 2006Google Scholar

Barkov, A. V, ‘Pravovoi status Evraziiskogo ekonomicheskogo soobschestva’ Moscow State Institute of International Relations (MGIMO) 2003Google Scholar

Ispolinov, A. S., ‘Sudy regional’nykh integratsionnykh ob’edinenii v mezhdunarodnom pravosudii (na primere Suda ES i Suda EAES)’ Moscow State University (MSU) 2018Google Scholar

Mansurov, T. A., ‘Metodologicheskie i institutsionalnye osnovy integratsii stran EvrAzES’ Institute of World Economy and International Relations of the Russian Academy of Sciences (IMEMO) 2012Google Scholar

Moiseev, A. L., ‘Razvitie integratsionnykh obrazovanii na postsovetskom prostranstve: Na primere EvrAzES’ Ural State University of Economics (USUE) 2006Google Scholar

Weiler, J. H. H., ‘Supranational Law and the Supranational System: Legal Structure and Political Process in the European Community’ European University Institute (EUI) 1982Google Scholar

Avbelj, M., ‘The Pitfalls of (Comparative) Constitutionalism for European Integration’ No 1 Eric Stein Working Paper (2008)Google Scholar

Cadier, D., ‘The Geopolitics of Eurasian Economic Integration’, LSE IDEAS Reports (2014)Google Scholar

Court of Justice of the European Union Annual Report 2016: Synopsis of the Work of the Court of Justice, the General Court and the Civil Service Tribunal, Publications Office of the European Union (Luxembourg, 2017)Google Scholar

Garcés de los Fayos, F., ‘The Signature of the Eurasian Union Treaty: A Difficult Birth, an Uncertain Future’ DG EXPO/B/PolDep/Note/2014_148 (2014)Google Scholar

Govaere, I., ‘To Give or to Grab: The Principle of Full, Crippled and Split Conferral of Powers Post-Lisbon’ No 4 College of Europe Research Papers in Law (2016)Google Scholar

Govaere, I., ‘TTIP and Dispute Settlement: Potential Consequences for the Autonomous EU Legal Order’ No 1 College of Europe Research Papers in Law (2016)Google Scholar

International Law Commission, Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties Arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law: Report of the Study Group of the International Law Commission, UN Doc. A/CN.4/L/682 (13 April 2006) (finalized by Martti Koskenniemi)Google Scholar

Koutrakos, P., ‘The Anatomy of Autonomy: Themes and Perspectives on an Elusive Principle’ Building Bridges: Central Banking Law in an Interconnected World. ECB Legal Conference 2019 (European Central Bank, 2019), pp. 90–103Google Scholar

Lenaerts, K. and Gutiérrez-Fons, J. A., ‘To Say What the Law of the EU Is: Methods of Interpretation and the European Court of Justice’ EUI Working Paper AEL 2013/9Google Scholar

Popescu, N., ‘Eurasian Union: The Real, the Imaginary and the Likely’ No 132 Chaillot Paper (2014)Google Scholar

Report of the Committee of Jurists Charged with Study of the Statute of the Permanent Court of International Justice, Doc C.166, M.66 1919, V (Geneva, 1929)Google Scholar

Report of the International Law Commission: Sixtieth Session (5 May–6 June and 7 July–8 August 2008) (New York: United Nations, 2008)Google Scholar

‘The Proceedings of the Court of Justice and Court of First Instance of the European Communities’, 22–26 May 1995 (No. 15/95)Google Scholar

‘Article by Prime Minister Vladimir Putin: “A new integration project for Eurasia: The future in the making” (“Izvestia”, 3 October 2011)’, Permanent Mission of the Russian Federation to the European Union, https://russiaeu.ru/ru/novosti/statya-predsedatelya-pravitelstva-rossii-vvputina-novyi-integratsionnyi-proekt-dlya-evraziiGoogle Scholar

‘Autonomy (n.)’, Online Etymology Dictionary, www.etymonline.com/word/autonomyGoogle Scholar

Christman, J., ‘Autonomy in Moral and Political Philosophy’, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2015/entries/autonomy-moral/Google Scholar

Comments to Art. 101, Draft Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, http://curia.europa.eu/jcms/upload/docs/application/pdf/2011-05/en_rp_cjue.pdfGoogle Scholar

‘Edinoe ekonomicheskoe prostranstvo EvrAzES’, Evraziiskoe ekonomicheskoe soobschestvo, www.evrazes.com/customunion/eeprGoogle Scholar

‘Evraziiskaia ekonomicheskaia integratsiia: tsifry i fakty’, Evraziiskaia ekonomicheskaia komissiia, www.eurasiancommission.org/ru/Documents/EEC_dig_facts1.pdfGoogle Scholar

‘Financial Penalties for Member States Cho Fail to comply with Judgments of the European Court of Justice: European Commission Clarifies Rules’, European Commission, http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-05-482_en.htm?locale=enGoogle Scholar

Goncharenko, R., ‘Russia Plans Eurasian Union on EU model’, www.dw.de/russia-plans-eurasian-union-on-eu-model/a-15615047Google Scholar

‘Governance’, Official Website of the EAEU, www.eaeunion.org/?lang=en#about-administrationGoogle Scholar

‘The Institution’, Official Website of the CJEU, https://curia.europa.eu/jcms/jcms/T5_5230/en/Google Scholar

International Law Commission, ’Draft Articles on the Responsibility of International Organizations, with Commentaries’, United Nations, http://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/commentaries/9_11_2011.pdfGoogle Scholar

Jefferson’s Opinion on the Constitutionality of a National Bank: 1791, The Avalon Project: Documents in Law, History and Diplomacy, http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/bank-tj.aspGoogle Scholar

Lazareva, L. V., ‘Kommentarii k Konstitutsii RF’, http://constitution.garant.ru/science-work/comment/5366634/chapter/3/#block_79Google Scholar

‘Negotiations and Agreements’, European Commission, http://ec.europa.eu/trade/policy/countries-and-regions/negotiations-and-agreements/#_other-countriesGoogle Scholar

‘O khode rabot po kodifikatsii mezhdunarodnykh dogovorov, sostavliaiuschikh dogovorno-pravovuiu bazu Tamozhennogo soiuza i Edinogo ekonomicheskogo prostranstva’, TKS, www.tks.ru/news/law/2012/04/28/0002Google Scholar

‘Ob itogakh konkursa na vypolnenie nauchno-issledovatel'skoi raboty to teme: ‘Kodifikatsiia mezhdunarodnykh dogovorov, sostavliaiuschikh dogovorno-pravovuiu bazu Tamozhennogo soiuza i Edinogo ekonomicheskogo prostranstva’, www.tsouz.ru/KTS/KTS31/Pages/R_806.aspxGoogle Scholar

The Official Website of the EAEU, www.eaeunion.orgGoogle Scholar

Pauwelyn, J., ‘Fragmentation of International Law’, The Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, http://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e1406Google Scholar

‘Russian Federation and the WTO’, Official Website of the WTO, www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/countries_e/russia_e.htmGoogle Scholar

‘Schuman Declaration May 1950’, https://european-union.europa.eu/principles-countries-history/history-eu/1945-59/schuman-declaration-may-1950_enGoogle Scholar

Waluchow, W., ‘Constitutionalism’, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2018/entries/constitutionalism/Google Scholar

‘WTO in Confusion after Russia Customs Union Plan’, Reuters, www.reuters.com/article/us-trade-wto-russia-analysis/wto-in-confusion-after-russia-customs-union-plan-idUSTRE55H18920090618Google Scholar