Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T09:38:57.022Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - A triptych of the reading brain: Evolution, development, pathology, and its intervention

from Part III - Brain, language, and mathematics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2009

Maryanne Wolf
Affiliation:
Center for Reading and Language Research Tufts University
Antonio M. Battro
Affiliation:
National Academy of Education, Argentina
Kurt W. Fischer
Affiliation:
Harvard University, Massachusetts
Pierre J. Léna
Affiliation:
Université de Paris VII (Denis Diderot)
Get access

Summary

Overview

The most remarkable property of the human brain is the capacity to develop new connections and establish new networks through the rearrangement of preexisting neuronal structures. To invent and assimilate new cognitive skills, like writing and reading, humans have used the cortical, subcortical, and cerebellar structures already produced by biological evolution, as Dehaene describes in his chapter. It took several millennia for our species to have reached the general literacy in the population, and today a child needs less than a decade of training to become fluent in reading. This remarkable neurological feat involves an impressive coordination of perceptual, attentional, motoric, linguistic, and cognitive components, all performing together at great speed. Any trouble within or among these complex components can produce disruptions or delays in the process of reading acquisition, as in developmental dyslexia. Wolf and her colleagues have created a successful intervention program with multiple parts (RAVE-O: Retrieval, Automaticity, Vocabulary, Engagement with language, Orthography) to improve reading fluency, with components based on research-based understanding of the delicate and complex processes of reading.

The Editors

The essence of intellectual change in recent human evolution lies not in the birth of new structures in our brain, but rather in the brain's extraordinary potential for the rearrangement of its existing neuronal pathways.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Educated Brain
Essays in Neuroeducation
, pp. 183 - 197
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to Read: Thinking and Learning about Print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Badian, N. (1996). Dyslexia: does it exist? Dyslexia, garden-variety poor reading, and the Double-Deficit Hypothesis. Paper presented at the Orton Dyslexia Society, Boston, MA.CrossRef
Beck, I. L., Perfetti, C. A., and McKeown, M. G. (1982). Effects of long-term vocabulary instructions on lexical access and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 506–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berninger, V. W., Abbott, R. D., Billingsley, F., and Nagy, W. (2001). Processes underlying timing and fluency of reading: Efficiency, automaticity, coordination, and morphological awareness. In Wolf, M. (ed.), Time, Fluency, and Dyslexia. Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Bowers, P. G. and Wolf, M. (1993). Theoretical links among naming speed, precise timing mechanisms and orthographic skill in dyslexia. Reading and Writing, 5, 69–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, U. (2003). Personal correspondence.
Dehaene, S. (2003). Pre-emption of human cortical circuits by numbers and language: The “neuronal” recycling hypothesis. Paper presented at Pontifical Academy of Sciences meeting. Vatican City.
Deacon, T. (1997). The Symbolic Species: The Co-evolution of Language and the Human Brain. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Denckla, M. B. and Rudel, R. G. (1976). Naming of objects by dyslexic and other learning-disabled children. Brain and Language, 3, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doehring, D. G. (1976). Acquisition of rapid reading responses. Monograph of the Society for Research in Child Development. Vols. 165 (2).Google Scholar
Foorman, B. R. (1994). Phonological and orthographic processing: Separate but equal? In Berninger, V. W. (ed.), The Varieties of Orthographic Knowledge I: Theoretical and Developmental Issues (pp. 319–355). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
German, D. J. (1992). Word finding intervention for children and adolescents. Topics in Learning Disorders, 13, 33–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geschwind, N. (1965). Disconnection syndrome in animals and man (Parts I, II). Brain, 88, 237–294, 585–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goswami, U. (1999). Causal connections in beginning reading: the importance of rhyme. Journal of Research in Reading, 22, 217–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, B. and Risley, T. R. (2003). The early catastrophe: The “30 million word gap.” American Educator, 27(1), 4–9.Google Scholar
Hebb, D. O. (1949). The Organization of Behaviour. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Ho Chan, D., Tsang, S.-M., and Lee, S.-H. (2002). The cognitive profile and multiple-deficit hypothesis in Chinese developmental psychology. Developmental Psychology, 38, 543–553.Google Scholar
Kame'enui, E. J., Simmons, D. C., Good, R. H., and Harn, B. A. (2001). The use of fluency-based measures in early identification and evaluation of intervention efficacy in schools. In Wolf, M. (ed.), Time, Fluency, and Dyslexia. Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Kame'enui, E. J., Dixon, R. C., and Carnine, D. W. (1987). Issues in the design of vocabulary instruction. In McKeown, M. G. and Curtis, M. E. (eds.), The Nature of Vocabulary Acquisition (pp. 129–145). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
LaBerge, D. and Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovett, M. W., Steinbach, K. A., and Frijters, J. C. (2000). Remediating the core deficits of developmental reading disability: A double-deficit perspective. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33(4), 334–358.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lyon, G. R. and Moats, L. C. (1997). Critical conceptual and methodological considerations in reading intervention research. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 578–588.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Manis, F. R., Doi, L. M., and Bhadha, B. (2000). Naming speed, phonological awareness, and orthographic knowledge in second graders. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 325–333.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meyer, M. S. and Felton, R. H. (1999). Repeated reading to enhance fluency: Old approaches and new directions. Annals of Dyslexia, 49, 283–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moats, L. (2000). Speech to Print: Language Essentials for Teachers. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Morris, R., Lovett, M., and Wolf, M. (1996). Treatment of developmental reading disabilities. NICHD grant proposal.Google Scholar
Perfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading Ability. New York: Oxford Press.Google Scholar
Schmandt-Besserat, D. (1992). Before Writing: From Counting to Cuneiform. College Station, TX: Texas University Press.Google Scholar
Seidenberg, M. and McCelland, J. (1989). A distributed developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 35–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Teale, W. and Sulzby, E. (eds.). (1986). Emergent Literacy: Writing and Reading. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, Co.Google Scholar
Wolf, M., O'Brien, B., Adams, K., Joffe, T., Jeffrey, J., Lovett, M., and Morris, R. (2003). Working for time: Reflections on naming speed, reading fluency, and intervention. In Foorman, B. (ed.)., Preventing and Remediating Reading Difficulties: Bringing Science to Scale. Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Wolf, M. and Katzir-Cohen, T. (2001). Reading fluency and its intervention. Scientific Studies of Reading (Special Issue on Fluency. Editors: E. Kame'enui and D. Simmons), 5, 211–238.
Wolf, M., Miller, L., and Donnelly, K. (2000). Retrieval, Automaticity, Vocabulary Elaboration, Orthography (RAVE-O): A comprehensive fluency-based reading intervention program. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33(4), 375–386.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolf, M. and Bowers, P. (2000). The question of naming-speed deficits in developmental reading disabilities: An introduction to the Double-Deficit Hypothesis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 322–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, M. and Bowers, P.(1999). The “Double-Deficit Hypothesis” for the developmental dyslexias. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(3), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, M. and Segal, D. (1999). Retrieval-rate, accuracy and vocabulary elaboration (RAVE) in reading-impaired children: A pilot intervention program. Dyslexia, 5, 1–27.3.0.CO;2-A>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, M. and Goodman, G. (1996). Speed Wizards: Computerized games for the teaching of reading fluency. Tufts University and Rochester Institute of Technology.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×