Tacit knowledge in production systems: how important is geography?

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511493386.006

5 - Tacit knowledge in production systems: how important is geography?

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 September 2009

Meric S. Gertler

Edited by

Karen R. Polenske

Show author details

Meric S. Gertler: Affiliation:
Professor of Geography and Planning, Goldring Chair in Canadian Studies, and co-director of the Program on Globalization and Regional Innovation Systems University of Toronto
Karen R. Polenske: Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Introduction

Within the field of innovation studies and technological change, the distinction between tacit and codified knowledge has recently been accorded great significance. Much of this interest was stimulated by Nelson and Winter (1982), whose classic work An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change made extensive use of the concept of tacit knowledge in their analysis of how organizational routines shape technological change. In so doing, these authors have helped revive widespread interest in the earlier work of Michael Polanyi (1958, 1966), to the point where tacit knowledge has come to be recognized as a central component of the learning economy (Lundvall and Johnson 1994) and a key to innovation and value creation.

Moreover, tacit knowledge has come to be acknowledged as a prime determinant of the geography of innovative activity, since its central role in the process of learning-through-interacting tends to reinforce the local over the global. Those interested in the geographical structure of production and innovation systems have argued that the strong tacit component of leading-edge technical knowledge induces (indeed, requires) spatial clustering for the purposes of knowledge sharing that leads to innovation (Cooke and Morgan 1998; Maskell and Malmberg 1999). For a growing number of scholars, this explains the perpetuation and deepening of geographical concentration in a world of expanding markets, weakening borders, and ever-cheaper and more pervasive communication technologies.

Type: Chapter
Information: The Economic Geography of Innovation , pp. 87 - 111

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511493386.006 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Allen, J., 2000. “Power/Economic Knowledge: Symbolic and Spatial Formations,” in Bryson, J. R., Daniels, P. W., Henry, N., and Pollard, J. (eds.), Knowledge, Space, Economy, London: Routledge: 15–33Google Scholar

Amin, A., 2000. “Organisational Learning Through Communities of Practice,” Paper presented at the Workshop on The Firm in Economic Geography, University of Portsmouth, March 9–11

Amin, A. and Cohendet, P., 1999. “Learning and Adaptation in Decentralised Business Networks,” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 17: 87–104CrossRef Google Scholar

2004. Architectures of Knowledge, Oxford: Oxford University Press

Arrow, K. J., 1962. “The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing,” Review of Economic Studies, 29: 155–173CrossRef Google Scholar

Asheim, B., 1996. “Industrial Districts As “Learning Regions”: A Condition for Prosperity?,” European Planning Studies, 4: 379–400CrossRef Google Scholar

Brown, J. S. and P. Duguid, 1996. “Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice,” in Cohen, M. and Sproull, L. (eds.), Organizational Learning, London: SageGoogle Scholar

2000. The Social Life of Information, Boston: Harvard Business School Press

Bunnell, T. and Coe, N., 2001. “Spaces and Scales of Innovation,” Progress in Human Geography, 25: 569–589CrossRef Google Scholar

Christopherson, S., 2002. “Why Do National Labor Market Practices Continue to Diverge in the Global Economy? The “Missing Link” of Investment Rules,” Economic Geography, 78: 1–20CrossRef Google Scholar

Cooke, P. and Morgan, K., 1998. The Associational Economy, Oxford: Oxford University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Cowan, R., David, P. A., and Foray, D., 2000. “The Explicit Economics of Knowledge Codification and Tacitness,” Industrial and Corporate Change, 9: 211–253CrossRef Google Scholar

Davenport, T. H. and L. Prusak, , 1998. Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know, Boston: Harvard Business School PressGoogle Scholar

Denning, S., 2001. The Springboard: How Storytelling Ignites Action in Knowledge-Era Organizations, Boston: Butterworth-HeinemannGoogle Scholar

Florida, R., 1995. “Toward the Learning Region,” Futures, 27: 527–536CrossRef Google Scholar

Gertler, M. S., 2004. Manufacturing Culture: The Institutional Geography of Industrial Practice, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Glasmeier, A., 2001. Manufacturing Time: Global Competition in the Watch Industry, 1795–2000, New York: Guilford PressGoogle Scholar

Hodgson, G. M., 1988. Economics and Institutions, Cambridge: Polity PressGoogle Scholar

Howells, J., 2000. “Knowledge, Innovation and Location,” in J. R. Bryson et al. (eds.): 50–62

Ichijo, K., G. von Krogh, and I. Nonaka, 1998. “Knowledge Enablers,” in Krogh, G., Roos, J., and Kleine, D. (eds.), Knowing in Firms, London: Sage: 173–203Google Scholar

Johnson, B., Lorenz, E., and Lundvall, B.-Å., 2002. “Why All This Fuss About Codified and Tacit Knowledge?,” Industrial and Corporate Change, 11: 245–262CrossRef Google Scholar

Kay, J., 1993. Foundations of Corporate Success, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Kochan, T. A. and Osterman, P., 1994. The Mutual Gains Enterprise, Boston: Harvard Business School PressGoogle Scholar

Kogut, B. and Zander, U., 1992. “Knowledge of the Firm: Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology,” Organizational Science, 3: 383–397CrossRef Google Scholar

Lam, A., 2000. “Tacit Knowledge, Organizational Learning and Societal Institutions: An Integrated Framework,” Organization Studies, 21: 487–513CrossRef Google Scholar

Leonard, D., 1995. Wellsprings of Knowledge: Building and Sustaining the Sources of Innovation, Boston: Harvard Business School PressGoogle Scholar

Leonard, D. and Swap, W., 2000. “Gurus in the Garage,” Harvard Business Review, 78: 71–82Google Scholar PubMed

Lundvall, B.-Å., 1988. “Innovation as an Interactive Process: From User–Producer Interaction to the National System of Innovation,” in Dosi, G., Freeman, C., Silverberg, G., and Soete, L. (eds.), Technical Change and Economic Theory, London: Frances Pinter: 349–369Google Scholar

Lundvall, B.-Å., and Johnson, B., 1994. “The Learning Economy,” Journal of Industry Studies, 1: 23–42CrossRef Google Scholar

Maskell, P. and Malmberg, A., 1999. “Localised Learning and Industrial Competitiveness,” Cambridge Journal of Economics, 23: 167–186CrossRef Google Scholar

McDowell, L., 1994. “The Transformation of Cultural Geography,” in Gregory, D., Martin, R., and Smith, G. (eds.), Human Geography, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press: 146–173CrossRef Google Scholar

Morgan, K., 1997. “The Learning Region: Institutions, Innovation and Regional Renewal,” Regional Studies, 31: 491–504CrossRef Google Scholar

2004. “The Exaggerated Death of Geography: Learning, Proximity and Territorial Innovation Systems,” Journal of Economic Geography, 4: 3–21CrossRef

Nelson, R. R. and Winter, S. G., 1982. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar

Nonaka, I., 1991. “The Knowledge Creating Company,” Harvard Business Review, 69: 96–104Google Scholar

Nonaka, I. and Takeuchi, H., 1995. The Knowledge-Creating Company, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

O'Sullivan, M., 2000. Contests for Corporate Control, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Penrose, E., 1959. The Theory of the Growth of the Firm, Oxford: Basil BlackwellGoogle Scholar

Polanyi, K., 1944. The Great Transformation, New York: RinehartGoogle Scholar

Polanyi, M., 1958. Personal Knowledge, London: Routledge & Kegan PaulGoogle Scholar

1966. The Tacit Dimension, New York: Doubleday

Prusak, L. (ed.), 1997. Knowledge in Organizations, Boston: Butterworth–HeinemannGoogle Scholar

Schoenberger, E., 1997. The Cultural Crisis of the Firm, Oxford: BlackwellGoogle Scholar

Storper, M., 1999. “The Resurgence of Regional Economics: Ten Years Later,” in Barnes, T. J. and Gertler, M. S. (eds.), The New Industrial Geography, London: Routledge: 23–53Google Scholar

Storper, M. and Leamer, E. E., 2001. “The Economic Geography of the Internet Age,” Journal of International Business Studies, 32: 641–665Google Scholar

Sveiby, K. E., 1997. The New Organizational Wealth, San Francisco: Berrett-KoehlerGoogle Scholar

Krogh, G., Ichijo, K., and Nonaka, I., 2000. Enabling Knowledge Creation: How to Unlock the Mystery of Tacit Knowledge and Release the Power of Innovation, Oxford: Oxford University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Wenger, E., 1998. Communities of Practice, Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef Google Scholar

Wever, K. S., 1995. Negotiating Competitiveness, Boston: Harvard Business School PressGoogle Scholar

Whitley, R., 1999. Divergent Capitalisms, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Zysman, J., 1994. “How Institutions Create Historically Rooted Trajectories of Growth,” Industrial and Corporate Change, 3: 243–283CrossRef Google Scholar