Adamík, P. & Král, M. (2008) Nest losses of cavity nesting birds caused by dormice (Gliridae, Rodentia). Acta Theriologica, 53, 185–192.Google Scholar

Aitken, K.E.H. & Martin, K. (2004) Nest cavity availability and selection in aspen-conifer groves in a grassland landscape. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 34, 2099–2109.Google Scholar

Aitken, K.E.H. & Martin, K. (2007) The importance of excavators in hole-nesting communities: Availability and use of natural tree holes in old mixed forests of western Canada. Journal of Ornithology, 148 (Suppl. 2), 425–434.Google Scholar

Aitken, K.E.H. & Martin, K. (2008) Resource selection plasticity and community responses to experimental reduction of a critical resource. Ecology, 89, 971–980.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Aitken, K.E.H. & Martin, K. (2012) Experimental test of nest-site limitation in mature mixed forests of central British Columbia. Journal of Wildlife Management, 76, 557–565.Google Scholar

Aitken, K.E.H., Wiebe, K.L. & Martin, K. (2002) Nest-site reuse patterns for a cavity-nesting bird community in interior British Columbia. Auk, 119, 391–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alatalo, R., Carlson, A. & Lundberg, A. (1990) Polygyny and breeding success of Pied Flycatchers nesting in natural cavities. In Population Biology of Passerine Birds. Blondel, J., Gosler, A., Lebreton, J.D. & McCleery, R. (eds.). Berlin: Springer Verlag, pp. 323–330.Google Scholar

Albano, D.J. (1992) Nesting mortality of Carolina Chickadees breeding in natural cavities. Condor, 94, 371–382.Google Scholar

Andersson, J., Domingo Gómez, E., Michon, S. & Roberge, J.-M. (2017) Tree cavity densities and characteristics in managed and unmanaged Swedish boreal forest. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research. DOI: 10.1080/02827581.2017.1360389.Google Scholar

Askins, R.A. (2014) Saving the World’s Deciduous Forests. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Bavrlic, K. (2008) The effects of partial harvesting on cavity-nesting birds in the Carolinian forests of southwestern Ontario: Habitat responses and species interactions. MSc Thesis, Trent University, Ontario. 222 pp.Google Scholar

Belles-Isles, J.C. & Picman, J. (1986) House Wren nest-destroying behaviour. Condor, 88, 190–193.Google Scholar

Blanc, L. & Martin, K. (2012) Identifying suitable woodpecker nest trees using decay selection profiles in trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides). Forest Ecology and Management, 286, 192–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blanc, L.A. & Walters, J.R. (2008a) Cavity-nest webs in a longleaf pine ecosystem. Condor, 110, 80–92.Google Scholar

Blanc, L.A. & Walters, J.R. (2008b) Cavity excavation and enlargement as mechanisms for indirect interactions in an avian community. Ecology, 89, 506–514.Google Scholar

Bonar, R.L. (2000) Availability of pileated woodpecker cavities and use by other species. Journal of Wildlife Management, 64, 52–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Broughton, R.K., Hebda, G., Maziarz, M., Smith, K.W., Smith, L. & Hinsley, S.A. (2015) Nest-site competition between bumblebees (Bombidae), social wasps (Vespidae) and cavity-nesting birds in Britain and the Western Palearctic. Bird Study, 62, 427–437.Google Scholar

Bull, E.L. & Jackson, J.A. (2011) Pileated Woodpecker (Dryocopus pileatus). In The Birds of North America online. Poole, A. (ed.). Ithaca: Cornell Lab of Ornithology; Retrieved from Birds of North America online: http://bna.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/148 doi:10.2173/bna.148.Google Scholar

Bunnell, F.L. (2013) Sustaining cavity-using species: Patterns of cavity use and implications to forest management. ISRN Forestry, 2013, 1–33.Google Scholar

Cadieux, P. (2011) Dynamics of cavity nesters along a forest age gradient in Boreal mixed wood or eastern North America. MSc Thesis, Université du Québec à Montréal, Québec.Google Scholar

Camprodon, J., Salvanyá, J. & Soler-Zurita, J. (2008) The abundance and suitability of tree cavities and their impact on hole-nesting bird populations in beech forests of NE Iberian Peninsula. Acta Ornithologica, 43, 17–31.Google Scholar

Carlson, A., Sandström, U. & Olsson, K. (1998) Availability and use of natural tree holes by cavity nesting birds in a Swedish deciduous forest. Ardea, 86, 109–119.Google Scholar

Christman, B.J. & Dhondt, A.A. (1997) Nest predation in Black-capped Chickadees: How safe are cavity nests? Auk, 114, 769–773.Google Scholar

Cockle, K.L. & Martin, K. (2015) Temporal dynamics of a commensal network of cavity-nesting vertebrates: Increased diversity during an insect outbreak. Ecology, 96, 1093–1104.Google Scholar

Cockle, K.L., Martin, K. & Drever, M.C. (2010) Supply of tree-holes limits nest density of cavity-nesting birds in primary and logged subtropical Atlantic forest. Biological Conservation, 143, 2851–2857.Google Scholar

Cockle, K.L., Martin, K. & Wesołowski, T. (2011) Woodpeckers, decay, and the future of cavity-nesting vertebrate communities worldwide. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 9, 377–382.Google Scholar

Conner, R.N., Rudolph, D.C., Saenz, D. & Schaefer, R.R. (1994) Heartwood, sapwood, and fungal decay associated with Red-cockaded Woodpecker cavity trees. Journal of Wildlife Management, 58, 728–734.Google Scholar

Cooke, H.A. & Hannon, S.J. (2011) Do aggregated harvests with structural retention conserve the cavity web of old upland forest in the boreal plains? Forest Ecology and Management, 261, 662–674.Google Scholar

Cooke, H.A. & Hannon, S.J. (2012) Nest site selection by old boreal forest cavity excavators as a basis for structural retention guidelines in spatially-aggregated harvests. Forest Ecology and Management, 269, 37–51.Google Scholar

Czeszczewik, D. & Walankiewicz, W. (2003) Natural nest sites of the Pied Flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca in a primeval forest. Ardea, 91, 221–230.Google Scholar

Czeszczewik, D., Walankiewicz, W., Mitrus, C. & Nowakowski, W. (1999) Nest-box data of Pied Flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca may lead to erroneous generalizations. Vogelwelt, 120, 361–365.Google Scholar

Czeszczewik, D., Walankiewicz, W., Mitrus, C. et al. (2013) Importance of dead wood resources for woodpeckers in coniferous stands of the Białowieża Forest. Bird Conservation International, 23, 414–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Czeszczewik, D., Walankiewicz, W. & Stańska, M. (2008) Small mammals in nests of cavity-nesting birds: Why should ornithologists study rodents? Canadian Journal of Zoology, 86, 286–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dhondt, A.A. (2007) What drives differences between North American and Eurasian tit studies? In The Ecology and Behavior of Chickadees and Titmice. Otter, K. (ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 299–310.Google Scholar

Drapeau, P., Nappi, A., Imbeau, L. & Saint-Germain, M. (2009) Standing deadwood for keystone bird species in the eastern boreal forest: Managing for snag dynamics. Forestry Chronicle, 85, 227–234.Google Scholar

Drever, M.C., Aitken, K.E.H., Norris, A.R. & Martin, K. (2008) Woodpeckers as reliable indicators of bird richness, forest health and harvest. Biological Conservation, 141, 624–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Drever, M.C. & Martin, K. (2010) Response of woodpeckers to changes in forest health and harvest: Implications for conservation of avian biodiversity. Forest Ecology and Management, 259, 958–966.Google Scholar

East, M.L. & Perrins, C.M. (1988) The effect of nestboxes on breeding populations of birds in broadleaved temperate woodlands. Ibis, 130, 393–401.Google Scholar

Edworthy, A., Drever, M.C. & Martin, K. (2011) Woodpeckers increase in abundance but maintain fecundity in response to an outbreak of mountain pine bark beetles. Forest Ecology and Management, 261, 203–210.Google Scholar

Edworthy, A.B. & Martin, K. (2013) Persistence of tree cavities used by cavity-nesting vertebrates declines in harvested forests. Journal of Wildlife Management, 77, 770–776.Google Scholar

Edworthy, A.B. & Martin, K. (2014) Long-term dynamics of the characteristics of tree cavities used for nesting by vertebrates. Forest Ecology and Management, 334, 122–128.Google Scholar

Edworthy, A.B., Wiebe, K.L. & Martin, K. (2012) Survival analysis of a critical resource for cavity-nesting communities: Patterns of tree cavity longevity. Ecological Applications, 22, 1733–1742.Google Scholar

Evans, M.R., Lank, D.B., Boyd, W.S. & Cooke, F. (2002) A comparison of the characteristics and fate of Barrow’s Goldeneye and Bufflehead nests in nest boxes and natural cavities. Condor, 104, 610–619.Google Scholar

Fauvel, B., Carré, F. & Lallement, H. (2001) Middle Spotted Woodpecker Dendrocopos medius ecology in the Champagne Region (East France). Alauda, 69, 87–101 [in French, English summary].Google Scholar

Fisher, R.J. & Wiebe, K.L. (2006) Nest site attributes and temporal patterns of northern flicker nest loss: Effects of predation and competition. Oecologia, 147, 744–753.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Frei, B., Nocera, J.J. & Fyles, J.W. (2015) Interspecific competition and nest survival of the threatened Red-headed Woodpecker. Journal of Ornithology, 156, 743–753.Google Scholar

Gibbons, P. & Lindenmayer, D. (2002) Tree Hollows and Wildlife Conservation in Australia. Collingwood: CSIRO Publishing.Google Scholar

Glutz von Blotzheim, U.N. & Bauer, K.M. (eds.) (1980) Handbuch der Vögel Mitteleuropas, Vol. 9. Wiesbaden: AULA-Verlag.Google Scholar

Glutz von Blotzheim, U.N. & Bauer, K.M. (1993) Handbuch der Vögel Mitteleuropas, Vol. 13. Wiesbaden: AULA-Verlag.Google Scholar

Gow, E.A., Wiebe, K.L. & Fox, J.W. (2015) Cavity use throughout the annual cycle of a migratory woodpecker as revealed by geolocators. Ibis, 157, 167–170.Google Scholar

Graczyk, R. (1973) Höhlenbrütende Vögel und biologische Bekämpfung von Insekten. Angewandte Ornithologie, 4, 71–94.Google Scholar

Gustafsson, L., Baker, S.C., Bauhus, J. et al. (2012) Retention forestry to maintain multifunctional forests: A world perspective. BioScience, 62, 633–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Günther, E. (1993) Selection of location of holes of Great Spotted Woodpecker and Middle Spotted Woodpecker (Dendrocopos major and D. medius) in the northeastern Harz Mountains (Sachsen-Anhalt). Ornithologische Mitteilungen des Museum Heineanum, 11, 67–73. [in German, English summary]Google Scholar

Günther, E. & Hellmann, M. (1995) Development of holes of spotted woodpeckers (Picoides) in nature-near deciduous forest in the northeastern Harz Mountains (Sachen-Anhalt) – Results of more than ten years of investigations of the use of natural tree holes. Ornithologische Mitteilungen des Museum Heineanum, 13, 27–52. [in German, English summary]Google Scholar

Günther, E. & Hellmann, M. (1997) Die Höhlen des Buntspechts – haben wir ihre Bedeutung für die Nachnutzer überschätzt? Naturschutz im Land Sachsen-Anhalt, 34, 15–24. [in German, English summary]Google Scholar

Günther, E. & Hellmann, M. (2001) Woodpeckers are seen as ‘key species’ – A key for whom? Abhandlungen und Berichte am dem Museum Heineanum, 5, 7–22. [in German, English summary]Google Scholar

Günther, E. & Hellmann, M. (2002) Strong decrease of population of tree-breeding Swift Apus apus in the northeastern Harz Mountains (Sachsen-Anhalt) – Was it the Racoon Procyon lotor? Ornithologische Mitteilungen des Museum Heineanum, 20, 81–98. [in German, English summary]Google Scholar

Günther, E., Hellmann, M. & Nicolai, B. (2004) Tree-breeding Common Swifts Apus apus – Relicts of ancient forest features? Vogelwelt, 125, 309–318. [in German, English summary]Google Scholar

Haftorn, S. & Slagsvold, T. (1995) Egg covering in birds: Description of the behaviour in tits (Parus spp.) and a test of hypotheses of its function. Cinclus, 18, 85-106.Google Scholar

Hagemeijer, E.J.M. & Blair, M.J. (1997) The EBCC Atlas of European Breeding Birds. London: Poyser.Google Scholar

Hansell, M. (2002) Animal Architecture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hansen, F. (1989) Nest hole excavation and reuse of nest holes by the Black Woodpecker on Bornholm, Denmark. Dansk Ornitologisk Forenings Tidsskrift, 83, 125–129. [in Danish, English summary]Google Scholar

Harding, S.R. & Walters, J.R. (2002) Processes regulating the population dynamics of red-cockaded woodpecker cavities. Journal of Wildlife Management, 66, 1083–1095.Google Scholar

Hebda, G., Wesołowski, T. & Rowiński, P. (2016) Nest sites of Middle Spotted Woodpeckers Leiopicus medius in a primeval forest. Ardea, 104, 119–128.Google Scholar

Holt, R.F. & Martin, K. (1997) Landscape modification and patch selection: The demography of two secondary cavity nesters colonizing clearcuts. Auk, 114, 443–455.Google Scholar

Höntsch, K. (2001) Nesting and roosting holes of Lesser Spotted Woodpecker Picoides minor. Abhandlungen und Berichte am dem Museum Heineanum, 5, 107–120. [in German]Google Scholar

Hooge, P.N., Stanback, M.T. & Koenig, W.D. (1999) Nest-site selection in the Acorn Woodpecker. Auk, 116, 45–54.Google Scholar

Howe, S., Kilgore, D.L. & Colby, C. (1987) Respiratory gas concentrations and temperatures within nest cavities of the northern flicker (Colaptes auratus). Canadian Journal of Zoology, 65, 1541–1547.Google Scholar

Ibarra, J.T., Martin, M., Cockle, K.L. & Martin, K. (2017) Maintaining ecosystem resilience: functional responses of tree cavity nesters to logging in temperate forests of the Americas. Scientific Reports, 7, 4467.Google Scholar

Ingold, D.J. (1989) Nesting phenology and competition for nest sites among red-headed and red-bellied woodpeckers and European starlings. Auk, 106, 209–217.Google Scholar

Jackson, J.A. & Jackson, B.J.S. (2004) Ecological relationships between fungi and woodpecker cavity sites. Condor, 106, 37–49.Google Scholar

Jędrzejewska, B. & Jędrzejewski, W. (1998). Predation in Vertebrate Communities. The Białowieża Primeval Forest as a Case Study. Berlin: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar

Johansen, B.T. (1989) Nest trees and nest holes of Black Woodpeckers in North Zealand, 1977–1986 Dansk Ornitologisk Forenings Tidsskrift, 83, 119–124. [in Danish, English summary]Google Scholar

Johnson, L.S. (2014) House Wren (Troglodytes aedon). In The Birds of North America online. Poole, A. (ed.). Ithaca: Cornell Lab of Ornithology; Retrieved from Birds of North America online: http://bna.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/380 doi:10.2173/bna.380.Google Scholar

Johnsson, K., Nilsson, S.G. & Tjernberg, M. (1990) The black woodpecker – A key-species in European forests. In Conservation and Management of Woodpecker Populations. Carlson, A. & Aulén, G. (eds.). Uppsala: Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, pp. 99–103.Google Scholar

Jusino, M.A., Lindner, D.L., Banik, M.T., Rose, K.R. & Walters, J.R. (2016) Experimental evidence of a symbiosis between red-cockaded woodpeckers and fungi. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 283, 20160106.Google Scholar

Jusino, M.A., Lindner, D.L., Banik, M.T. & Walters, J.R. (2015) Heart rot hotel: Fungal communities in red-cockaded woodpecker excavations. Fungal Ecology, 14, 33–44.Google Scholar

Juškaitis, R. (2006) Interactions between dormice (Gliridae) and hole-nesting birds in nestboxes. Folia Zoologica, 55, 225–236.Google Scholar

Kahler, H.A. & Anderson, J.T. (2006) Tree cavity resources for dependent cavity-using wildlife in West Virginia forests. Northern Journal of Applied Forestry, 23, 114–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kappes, J.J. & Sieving, K.E. (2011) Resin-barrier maintenance as a mechanism of differential predation among occupants of red-cockaded woodpecker cavities. Condor, 113, 362–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keast, A. (1990) Distribution and origin of forest birds. In Biogeography and Ecology of Forest Bird Communities. Keast, A. (ed.). The Hague: SPB Academic Publishing, pp. 49–59.Google Scholar

Kennedy, E.D. & White, D.W. (1997) Bewick’s Wren (Thryomanes bewickii). In The Birds of North America, no. 315. Poole, A. & Gill, F. (eds.). Philadelphia & Washington, DC: Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia and American Ornithologists’ Union.Google Scholar

Kiełbaska, M. (ed.) (1991) Mała encyklopedia leśna. Warszawa: PWN. [in Polish]Google Scholar

Kilham, L. (1971) Reproductive behavior of Yellow-bellied Sapsuckers. I. Preference for nesting in fomes-infected aspens and nest hole interrelations with flying squirrels, raccoons, and other animals. Wilson Bulletin, 83, 159–171.Google Scholar

Koch, A., Martin, K. & Aitken, K.E.H. (2012) The relationship between introduced European Starlings and the reproductive activity of Mountain Bluebirds and Tree Swallows in British Columbia. Ibis, 154, 590–600.Google Scholar

Koenig, W.D. (2003) European starlings and their effect on native cavity-nesting birds. Conservation Biology, 17, 1134–1140.Google Scholar

Kosiński, Z. & Winiecki, A. (2004) Nest-site selection and niche partitioning among the Great Spotted Woodpecker Dendrocopos major and Middle Spotted Woodpecker Dendrocopos medius in riverine forest of Central Europe. Ornis Fennica, 81, 145–156.Google Scholar

Kuitunen, M. & Aleknonis, A. (1992) Nest predation and breeding success in Common Treecreepers nesting in boxes and natural cavities. Ornis Fennica, 69, 7–12.Google Scholar

Latham, R.E. & Ricklefs, R.E. (1993) Continental comparisons of temperate-zone tree species diversity. In Species Diversity in Ecological Communities. Ricklefs, R.E. & Schluter, D. (eds.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 294–314.Google Scholar

Leisne, C. (1991) Untersuchungen zur Frage der nutzunstechnischenfolgen nach Fäll- und Rückeschäden bei Fichte. Freiburg: Mitteilungen der Forstlichen Versuchs und Forschungsanstalt Baden-Württemberg.Google Scholar

Li, P. & Martin, T.E. (1991) Nest-site selection and nesting success of cavity-nesting birds in high elevation forest drainages. Auk, 108, 405–418.Google Scholar

Lindenmayer, D.B., Burton, P.J. & Franklin, J.F. (2008) Salvage Logging and Its Ecological Consequences. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar

Lindenmayer, D.B., Franklin, J.F., Lõhmus, A. et al. (2012) A major shift to the retention approach for forestry can help resolve some global forest sustainability issues. Conservation Letters, 5 , 421–431.Google Scholar

Lõhmus, A. (2003) Do Ural owls (Strix uralensis) suffer from the lack of nests in managed forests? Biological Conservation, 110, 1–9.Google Scholar

Lõhmus, A & Remm, J. (2005) Nest quality limits the number of hole-nesting passerines in their natural cavity-rich habitat. Acta Oecologica, 27, 125–128.Google Scholar

Ludescher, F.B. (1973) Sumpfmeise (Parus p. palustris L.) und Weidenmeise (P. montanus salicarius Br.) als sympatrische Zwillingsarten. Journal of Ornithology, 114, 3–56.Google Scholar

Mahon, C.L. & Martin, K. (2006) Nest survival of chickadees in managed forests: Habitat, predator, and year effects. Journal of Wildlife Management, 70, 1257–1265.Google Scholar

Martin, K., Aitken, K.E.H. & Wiebe, K.L. (2004) Nest sites and nest webs for cavity-nesting communities in interior British Columbia, Canada: Nest characteristics and niche partitioning. Condor, 106, 5–19.Google Scholar

Martin, K. & Eadie, J. M. (1999) Nest webs: A community-wide approach to the management and conservation of cavity-nesting forest birds. Forest Ecology and Management, 115, 243–257.Google Scholar

Martin, K., Ibarra, J.T. & Drever, M. (2015) Avian surrogates in terrestrial ecosystems: Theory and practice. In Indicators and Surrogates in Ecology, Biodiversity and Environmental Management. Lindenmayer, D., Barton, P. & Pierson, J. (eds.). London: CSIRO Publishing, CRC Press, pp. 33–44.Google Scholar

Martin, T.E. (1993) Evolutionary determinants of clutch size in cavity-nesting birds: Nest predation or limited breeding opportunities? American Naturalist, 142, 937–946.Google Scholar

Martin, T.E. (2015) Consequences of habitat change and resource selection specialization for population limitation in cavity-nesting birds. Journal of Applied Ecology, 52, 475–485.Google Scholar

Martin, T.E. & Li, P. (1992) Life history traits of open- vs. cavity-nesting birds. Ecology, 73, 579–592.Google Scholar

Matthysen, E. (1998) The Nuthatches. London: Poyser.Google Scholar

Mazgajski, T.D. (1997) Changes in the numbers and nest sites of the Great Spotted Woodpecker Dendrocopos major and the Middle Spotted Woodpecker D. medius in the Las Bielański Reserve in Warsaw. Ochrona Przyrody, 54, 155–160. [in Polish, English summary]Google Scholar

Maziarz, M., Broughton, R.K. & Wesołowski, T. (2017) Microclimate in tree cavities and nest-boxes: Implications for hole-nesting birds. Forest Ecology and Management, 389, 306–313.Google Scholar

Maziarz, M. & Wesołowski, T. (2013) Microclimate of tree cavities used by Great Tits (Parus major) in a primeval forest. Avian Biology Research, 6, 47–56.Google Scholar

Maziarz, M. & Wesołowski, T. (2014) Darkness can limit the use of tree cavities for nesting by birds. Journal of Ornithology, 155, 793–799.Google Scholar

Maziarz, M., Wesołowski, T., Hebda, G. & Cholewa, M. (2015a) Natural nest-sites of Great Tits (Parus major) in a primeval temperate forest (Białowieża National Park, Poland). Journal of Ornithology, 156, 613–623.Google Scholar

Maziarz, M., Wesołowski, T., Hebda, G., Cholewa, M. & Broughton, R.K. (2015b) Breeding success of Great Tits Parus major in relation to attributes of natural nest-cavities in a primeval forest. Journal of Ornithology, 157, 343–354.Google Scholar

Mcdevitt, A.D., Kajtoch, Ł., Mazgajski, T.D., Carden, R.F. & Coscia, I. (2011) The origins of Great Spotted Woodpeckers Dendrocopos major colonizing Ireland revealed by mitochondrial DNA. Bird Study, 58, 361–364.Google Scholar

Meidinger, D. & Pojar, J. (eds.) (1991) Ecosystems of British Columbia. Victoria: British Columbia Ministry of Forests Special Report Series No. 6.Google Scholar

Meyer, W. & Meyer, B. (2001) Construction and use of Black Woodpecker Dryocopus martius holes in Thuringia/Germany. Abhandlungen und Berichte am dem Museum Heineanum, 5, 121–131. [in German, English summary]Google Scholar

Michon, S. (2014) Comparison of tree cavity abundance and characteristics in managed and unmanaged Swedish boreal forest. MSc Thesis. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå.Google Scholar

Mikusiński, G. & Angelstam, P. (1997) European woodpeckers and anthropogenic habitat change: A review. Vogelwelt, 118, 277–283.Google Scholar

Morozov, N.S. (2009) A city as an object for synecological studies: A search for density compensation among birds breeding in urban woodlands. In Species and Communities in Extreme Environments. Golovatch, S.I., Makarova, O.L., Babenko, A.B. & Penev, L.D. (eds.). Sofia: Pensoft Publishers & KMK Scientific Press, pp. 459–520.Google Scholar

Nappi, A. & Drapeau, P. (2009) Reproductive success of the black-backed woodpecker (Picoides arcticus) in burned boreal forests: Are burns source habitats? Biological Conservation, 142, 1381–1391.Google Scholar

Nappi, A. & Drapeau, P. (2011) Pre-fire forest conditions and fire severity as determinants of the quality of burned forests for deadwood-dependent species: The case of the black-backed woodpecker Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 41, 994-1003.Google Scholar

Nappi, A., Drapeau, P., Angers, V.A. & Saint-Germain, M. (2010) Effect of fire severity on long-term occupancy of saproxylic beetles and bark-foraging birds in burned boreal conifer forests. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 19, 500–511.Google Scholar

Nappi, A., Drapeau, P. & Leduc, A. (2015) How important is dead wood for woodpeckers foraging in eastern North American boreal forests? Forest Ecology and Management, 346, 10–21.Google Scholar

Newton, I. (1994) The role of nest sites in limiting the numbers of hole-nesting birds: A review. Biological Conservation, 70, 265–276.Google Scholar

Newton, I. (1998) Population Limitation in Birds. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Nielsen, C.L.R., Gates, R.J. & Zwicker, E.H. (2007) Projected availability of natural cavities for wood ducks in Southern Illinois. Journal of Wildlife Management, 71, 875–883.Google Scholar

Nilsson, S.G. (1984) The evolution of nest-site selection among hole-nesting birds: The importance of nest predation and competition. Ornis Scandinavica, 15, 167–175.Google Scholar

Nilsson, S.G., Johnsson, K. & Tjernberg, M. (1991) Is avoidance by Black Woodpeckers of old nest holes due to predators? Animal Behaviour, 41, 439–441.Google Scholar

Norris, A. (2012) Mechanisms regulating ecological responses to resource pulses within cavity-nesting bird communities. PhD thesis. University of British Columbia, Vancouver.Google Scholar

Oliver, C.D., Harrington, C. & Bickford, M. (1994) Maintaining and creating old grown structural features in previously disturbed stands typical of eastern Washington Cascades. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 2, 353–387.Google Scholar

Ouellet-Lapointe, U., Drapeau, P., Cadieux, P. & Imbeau, L. (2012) Woodpecker excavations suitability for and occupancy by cavity users in the boreal mixedwood forest of eastern Canada. Écoscience, 19, 391–397.Google Scholar

Paclík, M., Misík, J. & Weidinger, K. (2009) Nest predation and nest defence in European and North American woodpeckers: A review. Annales Zoologici Fennici, 46, 361–379.Google Scholar

Pasinelli, G. (2007) Nest site selection in middle and great spotted woodpeckers Dendrocopos medius & D. major: Implications for forest management and conservation. Biodiversity and Conservation, 16, 1283–1298.Google Scholar

Poulin, J-F., D’Astous, E., Villard, M-A. et al. (2013) Brown Creeper (Certhia americana). The Birds of North America online. Poole, A. (ed.). Ithaca: Cornell Lab of Ornithology. Retrieved from Birds of North America online: http://bna.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/669 doi:10.2173/bna.669.Google Scholar

Raphael, M.G. & White, M. (1984) Use of snags by cavity-nesting birds in the Sierra Nevada. Wildlife Monographs, 86, 1–66.Google Scholar

Remm, J. & Lõhmus, A. (2011) Tree cavities in forest – The broad distribution pattern of a keystone structure for biodiversity. Forest Ecology and Management, 262, 579–585.Google Scholar

Remm, J., Lõhmus, A. & Remm, K. (2006) Tree cavities in riverine forests: What determines their occurrence and use by hole-nesting passerines? Forest Ecology and Management, 221, 267–277.Google Scholar

Rendell, W.B. & Robertson, R.J. (1989) Nest-site characteristics, reproductive success and cavity availability for tree swallows breeding in natural cavities. Condor, 91, 875–885.Google Scholar

Roberge, J.-M., Angelstam, P. & Villard, M.-A. (2008) Specialised woodpeckers and naturalness in hemiboreal forests – Deriving quantitative targets for conservation planning. Biological Conservation, 141, 997–1012.Google Scholar

Robles, H. & Martin, K. (2013) Resource quantity and quality determine the inter-specific associations between ecosystem engineers and resource users in a cavity-nest web. PLoS ONE, 8(9): e74694.Google Scholar

Robles, H., Ciudad, C. & Matthysen, E. (2011) Tree-cavity occurrence, cavity occupation and reproductive performance of secondary cavity-nesting birds in oak forests: The role of traditional management practices. Forest Ecology and Management, 261, 1428–1435.Google Scholar

Rolstad, J., Rolstad, E. & Sæteren, Y. (2000) Black woodpecker nest sites: Characteristics, selection, and reproductive success. Journal of Wildlife Management, 64, 1053–1066.Google Scholar

Ruczyński, I. & Bogdanowicz, W. (2005) Roost cavity selection by Nyctalus noctula and N. leisleri (Vespertilionidae, Chiroptera) in Białowieża Primeval Forest, Eastern Poland. Journal of Mammalogy, 86, 921–930.Google Scholar

Rudat, V., Kühlke, D., Meyer, W. & Wiesner, J. (1979) On the nest-site ecology of Black Woodpecker (Dryocopus martius [L.]), Tengmalm’s Owl (Aegolius funereus [L.]) and Stock-Dove (Columba oenas [L.]) Zoologische Jahrbücher Systematik, 106, 295–310. [in German, English summary]Google Scholar

Rudolph, D.C., Kyle, H. & Conner, R.N. (1990) Red-cockaded Woodpeckers vs rat snakes: The effectiveness of the resin barrier. Wilson Bulletin, 102, 14–22.Google Scholar

Saab, V.A., Dudley, J. & Thompson, W.L. (2004) Factors influencing occupancy of nest cavities in recently burned forests. Condor, 106, 20–36.Google Scholar

Saari, L. & Mikusiński, G. (1996) Population fluctuations of woodpecker species on the Baltic Island of Aasla, SW Finland. Ornis Fennica, 73, 168–178.Google Scholar

Sandström, U. (1992) Cavities in trees: Their occurrence, formation and importance for hole-nesting birds in relation to silvicultural practice. Report 23. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala.Google Scholar

Schmidt, O. (2006) Wood and Tree Fungi. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar

Schwarze, F.W., Engels, M.R., Engels, J. & Mattheck, C. (2000) Fungal Strategies of Wood Decay in Trees. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scott, V.E., Evans, K.E., Patton, D.R. & Stone, C.P. (1977) Cavity-nesting Birds of North American Forests. US Department of Agriculture Handbook No. 511.Google Scholar

Sedgwick, J.A. & Knopf, F.L. (1990) Habitat relationships and nest site characteristics of cavity-nesting birds in cottonwood floodplains. Journal of Wildlife Management, 54, 112–124.Google Scholar

Sedgwick, J.A. & Knopf, F.L. (1991) The loss of avian cavities by injury compartmentalization. Condor, 93, 781–783.Google Scholar

Sedgwick, J.A. & Knopf, F.L. (1992) Cavity turnover and equilibrium cavity densities in a cottonwood bottomland. Journal of Wildlife Management, 56, 477–484.Google Scholar

Smith, K.W. (1997) Nest site selection of the Great Spotted Woodpecker Dendrocopos major in two oak woods in Southern England and its implications for woodland management. Biological Conservation, 80, 283–288.Google Scholar

Smith, K.W. (2007) The utilization of dead wood resources by woodpeckers in Britain. Ibis, 149 (Suppl. 2), 183–192.Google Scholar

Sorace, A., Consiglio, C., Tanda, F., Lanzuisi, E., Cattaneo, A. & Iavicoli, D. (2000) Predation by snakes on eggs and nestlings of Great Tit Parus major and Blue Tit P. caeruleus. Ibis, 142, 328–330.Google Scholar

Stauffer, D.F. & Best, L.B. (1982) Nest-site selection by cavity-nesting birds of riparian habitats in Iowa. Wilson Bulletin, 94, 329–337.Google Scholar

Straus, M.A., Bavrlic, K., Nol, E., Burke, D.M. & Elliott, K.A. (2011) Reproductive success of cavity-nesting birds in partially harvested woodlots. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 41, 1004–1017.Google Scholar

Tiainen, J., Saurola, P. & Solonen, T. (1984) Nest distribution of the Pied Flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca in an area saturated with nestboxes. Annales Zoologici Fennici, 21, 199–204.Google Scholar

Tomiałojć, L. (1995) The birds of the Białowieża Forest – Additional data and summary. Acta Zoologica Cracoviensia, 38, 363–397.Google Scholar

Tomiałojć, L., Wesołowski, T. & Walankiewicz, W. (1984) Breeding bird community of a primaeval temperate forest (Białowieża National Park, Poland). Acta Ornithologica, 20, 241–310.Google Scholar

Tozer, D.C., Burke, D.M. & Nol, E. (2011) Quality of mature aspen and maple forests for breeding yellow-bellied sapsuckers (Sphyrapicus varius). Canadian Journal of Zoology, 89 , 148–160.Google Scholar

Tozer, D.C., Burke, D.M., Nol, E. & Elliott, K.A. (2012) Managing ecological traps: Logging and sapsucker nest predation by bears. Journal of Wildlife Management, 76, 887–898.Google Scholar

Tozer, D.C., Nol, E., Burke, D.M., Elliott, K.A. & Falk, K.J. (2009) Predation by bears on woodpecker nests: Are nestling begging and habitat choice risky business? Auk, 126, 300–309.Google Scholar

Tremblay, J.A., Ibarzabal, J., Savard, J.-P.L. & Wilson, S. (2014) Influence of old coniferous habitat on nestling growth of Black-backed Woodpeckers Picoides arcticus. Acta Ornithologica, 49, 273–279.Google Scholar

Tremblay, J.A., Savard, J.-P. & Ibarzabal, J. (2015) Structural retention requirements for a key ecosystem engineer in conifer-dominated stands of a boreal managed landscape in eastern Canada. Forest Ecology and Management, 357, 220–227.Google Scholar

Vaillancourt, M., Drapeau, P., Robert, M. & Gauthier, T. (2009) Origin and availability of large cavities for Barrow’s Goldeneye (Bucephala islandica), a species at risk inhabiting the eastern Canadian boreal forest. Avian Conservation and Ecology, 4(1), 6. www.ace-eco.org/vol4/iss1/art6/.Google Scholar

van Balen, J.H., Booy, C.J.H., van Franeker, J.A. & Osieck, E.R. (1982) Studies on hole-nesting birds in natural nest sites. 1. Availability and occupation of natural nest sites. Ardea, 70, 1–24.Google Scholar

van der Hoek, Y., Gaona, G.V. & Martin, K. (2017) The diversity, distribution and conservation status of the tree-cavity nesting birds of the world. Diversity and Distributions, 23, 1120–1131.Google Scholar

Von Haartman, L. (1957) Adaptation in hole-nesting birds. Evolution, 11, 339–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Walankiewicz, W. (1991) Do secondary cavity-nesting birds suffer more from competition for cavities or from predation in a primeval deciduous forest? Natural Areas Journal, 11, 203–212.Google Scholar

Walankiewicz, W. (2002a) Nest predation as a limiting factor to the breeding population size of the Collared Flycatcher Ficedula albicollis in the Białowieża National Park (NE Poland). Acta Ornithologica, 37, 91–106.Google Scholar

Walankiewicz, W. (2002b) Breeding losses in the Collared Flycatcher Ficedula albicollis caused by nest predators in the Białowieża National Park (Poland). Acta Ornithologica, 37, 21–26.Google Scholar

Walankiewicz, W., Czeszczewik, D., Mitrus, C. & Bida, E. (2002) Snag importance for woodpeckers in deciduous stands of the Białowieża Forest. Notatki Ornitologiczne, 43, 61–71. [in Polish, English summary]Google Scholar

Walankiewicz, W., Czeszczewik, D., Stański, T., Sahel, M. & Ruczyński, I. (2014) Tree cavity resources in spruce-pine managed and protected stands of the Białowieża Forest, Poland. Natural Areas Journal, 34, 423–428.Google Scholar

Walankiewicz, W. & Mitrus, C. (1997) How nest-box data have led to erroneous generalizations: The case of the competition between Great Tit Parus major and Ficedula flycatchers. Acta Ornithologica, 32, 209–212.Google Scholar

Wesołowski, T. (1989) Nest-sites of hole-nesters in a primaeval temperate forest (Białowieża National Park, Poland). Acta Ornithologica, 25, 321–351.Google Scholar

Wesołowski, T. (1995a) The loss of avian cavities by injury compartmentalization in a primeval European forest. Condor, 97, 256–257.Google Scholar

Wesołowski, T. (1995b) Ecology and behaviour of White-backed Woodpecker (Dendrocopos leucotos) in a primaeval temperate forest (Białowieża National Park, Poland). Vogelwarte, 38, 61–75.Google Scholar

Wesołowski, T. (1996) Natural nest sites of Marsh Tits Parus palustris in a primaeval forest (Białowieża National Park, Poland). Vogelwarte, 38, 235–249.Google Scholar

Wesołowski, T. (2001) Ground checks – An efficient and reliable method to monitor holes’ fate. Ornis Fennica, 78, 193–197.Google Scholar

Wesołowski, T. (2002) Antipredator adaptations in nesting marsh tits Parus palustris – The role of nest site security. Ibis, 144, 593–601.Google Scholar

Wesołowski, T. (2003) Bird community dynamics in a primaeval forest – Is interspecific competition important? Ornis Hungarica, 12, 51–62.Google Scholar

Wesołowski, T. (2007a) Lessons from long-term hole-nester studies in a primeval temperate forest. Journal of Ornithology, 148 (Suppl. 2), 395S–405S.Google Scholar

Wesołowski, T. (2007b) Primeval conditions – What can we learn from them? Ibis, 149 (Suppl. 2), 64S–77S.Google Scholar

Wesołowski, T. (2011a) “Lifespan” of woodpecker-made holes in a primeval temperate forest: A thirty year study. Forest Ecology and Management, 262,1846–1852.Google Scholar

Wesołowski, T. (2011b) Reports from nestbox studies: A review of inadequacies. Acta Ornithologica, 46, 13–17.Google Scholar

Wesołowski, T. (2012) “Lifespan” of non-excavated holes in a primeval temperate forest: A 30 year study. Biological Conservation, 153, 118–126.Google Scholar

Wesołowski, T. (2013) Timing and stages of nest building by Marsh Tits Poecile palustris in a primaeval forest. Avian Biology Research, 6, 31–38.Google Scholar

Wesołowski, T., Czeszczewik, D., Hebda, G., Maziarz, M., Mitrus, C. & Rowiński, P. (2015) 40 years of breeding bird community dynamics in a primeval temperate forest (Białowieża National Park, Poland). Acta Ornithologica, 50, 95-120.Google Scholar

Wesołowski, T., Czeszczewik, D., Mitrus, C. & Rowiński, P. (2003) Birds of the Białowieża National Park. Notatki Ornitologiczne, 44, 1–31. [in Polish, English summary]Google Scholar

Wesołowski, T., Czeszczewik, D., Rowiński, P. & Walankiewicz, W. (2002) Nest soaking in natural holes – A serious cause of breeding failure? Ornis Fennica, 79, 132–138.Google Scholar

Wesołowski, T. & Maziarz, M. (2012) Dark tree cavities – A challenge for hole nesting birds? Journal of Avian Biology, 43, 454–460.Google Scholar

Wesołowski, T., Mitrus, C., Czeszczewik, D. & Rowiński, P. (2010) Breeding bird dynamics in a primeval temperate forest over 35 years: Variation and stability in a changing world. Acta Ornithologica, 45, 209–232.Google Scholar

Wesołowski, T. & Rowiński, P. (2004) The breeding behaviour of the Nuthatch Sitta europaea in relation to natural hole attributes in a primeval forest. Bird Study, 51, 143–155.Google Scholar

Wesołowski, T. & Rowiński, P. (2012) The breeding performance of Blue Tits Cyanistes caeruleus in relation to the attributes of natural holes in a primeval forest. Bird Study, 59, 437–448.Google Scholar

Wesołowski, T. & Rowiński, P. (2014) Do Blue Tits Cyanistes caeruleus synchronise reproduction with caterpillar peaks in a primeval forest? Bird Study, 61, 235–245.Google Scholar

Wesołowski, T., Rowiński, P., Mitrus, C. & Czeszczewik, D. (2006) Breeding bird community of a primeval temperate forest (Białowieża National Park, Poland) at the beginning of the 21st century. Acta Ornithologica, 41, 55–70.Google Scholar

Wesołowski, T. & Tomiałojć, L. (1986) The breeding ecology of woodpeckers in a temperate primaeval forest – Preliminary data. Acta Ornithologica, 22, 1–21.Google Scholar

Wesołowski, T. & Tomiałojć, L. (2005) Nest sites, nest predation, and productivity of avian broods in a primeval temperate forest: Do the generalisations hold? Journal of Avian Biology, 36, 361–367.Google Scholar

West, A., Cassey, P. & Thomas, C.M. (2015) Microbiology of nests and eggs. In Nests, Eggs and Incubation. Deeming, D.C. & Reynolds, S.J. (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 75–81.Google Scholar

Wiebe, K.L. (2003) Delayed timing as a strategy to avoid nest-site competition: Testing a model using data from starlings and flickers. Oikos, 100, 291–298.Google Scholar

Wiebe, K.L. (2011) Nest sites as limiting resources for cavity-nesting birds in mature forest ecosystems: A review of the evidence. Journal of Field Ornithology, 82, 239–248.Google Scholar

Wiebe, K.L. (2014) Responses of cavity-nesting birds to fire: Testing a general model with data from the Northern Flicker. Ecology, 95, 2537–2547.Google Scholar

Wiebe, K.L. (2017) Northern flickers only work when they have to: How individual traits, population size and landscape disturbances affect excavation rates of an ecosystem engineer. Journal of Avian Biology, 48, 431–438.Google Scholar

Wiebe, K.L., Koenig, W. D. & Martin, K. (2007) Costs and benefits of nest reuse versus excavation in cavity-nesting birds. Annales Zoologici Fennici, 44, 209–217.Google Scholar

Wiebe, K.L. & Moore, W.S. (2008) Northern Flicker (Colaptes auratus). In The Birds of North America online. Poole, A. (ed.). Ithaca: Cornell Lab of Ornithology. Retrieved from Birds of North America online: http://bna.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/166a.Google Scholar

Winter, S., Begehold, H., Herrmann, M. et al. (2015) Praxishandbuch – Naturschutz im Buchenwald. Naturschutzziele und Bewirtschaftungsempfehlungen für reife Buchenwälder Nordostdeutschlands. Potsdam: Ministerium für Ländliche Entwicklung, Umwelt und Landwirtschaft Brandenburg.Google Scholar

Worrall, J.J. (2015) Forest & Shade Tree Pathology. www.forestpathology.org/. Accessed 6 December 2015.Google Scholar

Zahner, V., Sikora, L. & Pasinelli, G. (2012) Heart rot as a key factor for cavity tree selection in the black woodpecker. Forest Ecology and Management, 271, 98–103.Google Scholar

Zawadzka, D., Drozdowski, S., Zawadzki, G. & Zawadzki, J. (2016) The availability of cavity trees along an age gradient in fresh pine forests. Silva Fennica, 50, 3, id 1441.Google Scholar

Zwarts, L., Bijlsma, R.G., van den Kamp, J. & Wymenga, E. (2009) Living on the Edge: Wetlands and Birds in a Changing Sahel. Zeist: KNNV Publishing.Google Scholar