Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-669899f699-qzcqf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-04T07:57:26.623Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 2 - What Is Endometrial Receptivity?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2025

Roy G. Farquharson
Affiliation:
Liverpool Women’s Hospital
Mary D. Stephenson
Affiliation:
University of Illinois, Chicago
Mariëtte Goddijn
Affiliation:
Amsterdam University Medical Centers
Get access

Summary

Endometrial receptivity to human embryo implantation can be simply defined as the ability for the maternal endometrium to support appropriate attachment, invasion, and maintenance of the early human embryo. In contrast to the simplicity of definition, understanding the mechanisms involved in early human embryo implantation are severely limited due to differences between humans and experimental animals, as well as ethical, moral, and technological barriers to direct observation of human implantation in vivo and ex vivo. There is no doubt, however, that the human endometrium has a limited temporal window of receptivity during which normal embryo implantation can occur, and that this time window is largely driven by the action of progesterone. Given the critical nature of endometrial receptivity and implantation in fertility and pregnancy health, it remains an important area of study despite the barriers. This chapter reviews our understanding of endometrial receptivity as gleaned from animal studies, observational studies in women attempting conception with or without medical assistance, and limited experimental studies in women undergoing assisted reproduction. We conclude the chapter with a brief description and appraisal of proposed clinical testing for altered receptivity.

Type
Chapter
Information
Early Pregnancy , pp. 5 - 12
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Young, S. L., Lessey, B. A.. Progesterone function in human endometrium: clinical perspectives. Semin Reprod Med. 2010;28(1):516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirby, D. R.. Ectopic autografts of blastocysts in mice maintained in delayed implantation. J Reprod Fertil. 1967;14(3):515–17.Google ScholarPubMed
De Cecco, L., Capitanio, G. L., Croce, S., Forcucci, M., Gerbaldo, D., Rissone, R.. Biology of nidation and ectopic implantation. Acta Eur Fertil. 1984;15(5):347–55.Google ScholarPubMed
Rogers, P. A., MacPherson, A. M., Beaton, L. A.. Embryo implantation in the anterior chamber of the eye. Effects on uterine allografts and the microvasculature. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1988;541:455–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hertig, A. T., Rock, J., Adams, E. C.. A description of 34 human ova within the first 17 days of development. Am J Anat. 1956;98(3):435–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilcox, A. J., Baird, D. D., Weinberg, C. R.. Time of implantation of the conceptus and loss of pregnancy. N Engl J Med. 1999;340(23):1796–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fritz, M. A., Hess, D. L., Patton, P. E.. Influence of corpus luteum age on the steroidogenic response to exogenous human chorionic gonadotropin in normal cycling women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;167(3):709–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Navot, D., Bergh, P. A., Williams, M., Garrisi, G. J., Guzman, I., Sandler, B., et al. An insight into early reproductive processes through the in vivo model of ovum donation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1991;72(2):408–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prapas, Y., Prapas, N., Jones, E. E., Duleba, A. J., Olive, D. L., Chatziparasidou, A., et al. The window for embryo transfer in oocyte donation cycles depends on the duration of progesterone therapy. Hum Reprod. 1998;13(3):720–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allen, W. M.. My life with progesterone. 1970. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193(4):1575–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rock, J., Bartlett, M. K.. Biopsy studies of human endometrium: criteria of dating and information about amenorrhea, menorrhagia, and time of ovulation. J Am Med Assoc. 1937;108(24):2022–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, G. E. S.. Some newer aspects of the management of infertility. J Am Med Assoc. 1949;141(16):1123–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Noyes, R. W., Hertig, A. T., Rock, J.. Dating the endometrial biopsy. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1950;5(4):561–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, R. T., Snyder, R. R., Bagnall, J. W., Reed, K. D., Adair, C. F., Hensley, S. D.. Evaluation of the impact of intraobserver variability on endometrial dating and the diagnosis of luteal phase defects. Fertil Steril. 1993;60(4):652–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coutifaris, C., Myers, E. R., Guzick, D. S., Diamond, M. P., Carson, S. A., Legro, R. S., et al. Histological dating of timed endometrial biopsy tissue is not related to fertility status. Fertil Steril. 2004;82(5):1264–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, M. J., Meyer, W. R., Zaino, R. J., Lessey, B. A., Novotny, D. B., Ireland, K., et al. A critical analysis of the accuracy, reproducibility, and clinical utility of histologic endometrial dating in fertile women. Fertil Steril. 2004;81(5):1333–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Filicori, M., Butler, J. P., Crowley, W. F.. Neuroendocrine regulation of the corpus luteum in the human. Evidence for pulsatile progesterone secretion. J Clin Invest. 1984;73(6):1638–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pawar, S., Hantak, A. M., Bagchi, I. C., Bagchi, M. K.. Minireview: steroid-regulated paracrine mechanisms controlling implantation. Mol Endocrinol. 2014;28(9):1408–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paulson, R. J., Hatch, I. E., Lobo, R. A., Sauer, M. V.. Cumulative conception and live birth rates after oocyte donation: implications regarding endometrial receptivity. Hum Reprod. 1997;12(4):835–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tan, J., Paria, B. C., Dey, S. K., Das, S. K.. Differential uterine expression of estrogen and progesterone receptors correlates with uterine preparation for implantation and decidualization in the mouse. Endocrinology. 1999;140(11):5310–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lessey, B. A., Palomino, W. A., Apparao, K. B. C., Young, S. L., Lininger, R. A.. Estrogen receptor-alpha (ER-alpha) and defects in uterine receptivity in women. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2006;4 Suppl (1):S9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, D. K., Kurihara, I., Jeong, J. W., Lydon, J. P., DeMayo, F. J., Tsai, M. J., et al. Suppression of ERalpha activity by COUP-TFII is essential for successful implantation and decidualization. Mol Endocrinol. 2010;24(5):930–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dorostghoal, M., Ghaffari, H. O., Marmazi, F., Keikhah, N.. Overexpression of endometrial estrogen receptor-alpha in the window of implantation in women with unexplained infertility. Int J Fertil Steril. 2018;12(1):3742.Google ScholarPubMed
Zhang, D., Ma, C., Sun, X., Xia, H., Zhang, W.. S100P expression in response to sex steroids during the implantation window in human endometrium. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2012;10:106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lessey, B. A., Damjanovich, L., Coutifaris, C., Castelbaum, A., Albelda, S. M., Buck, C. A.. Integrin adhesion molecules in the human endometrium. Correlation with the normal and abnormal menstrual cycle. J Clin Invest. 1992;90(1):188–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lessey, B. A., Castelbaum, A. J., Buck, C. A., Lei, Y., Yowell, C. W., Sun, J.. Further characterization of endometrial integrins during the menstrual cycle and in pregnancy. Fertil Steril. 1994;62(3):497506.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vasquez, Y. M., Wang, X., Wetendorf, M., Franco, H. L., Mo, Q., Wang, T., et al. FOXO1 regulates uterine epithelial integrity and progesterone receptor expression critical for embryo implantation. PLoS Genet. 2018;14(11):e1007787.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kliman, H. J., Frankfurter, D.. Clinical approach to recurrent implantation failure: evidence-based evaluation of the endometrium. Fertil Steril. 2019;111(4):618–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Labarta, E., Sebastian-Leon, P., Devesa-Peiro, A., Celada, P., Vidal, C., Giles, J., et al. Analysis of serum and endometrial progesterone in determining endometrial receptivity. Hum Reprod. 2021;36(11):2861–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Díaz-Gimeno, P., Horcajadas, J. A., Martínez-Conejero, J. A., Esteban, F. J., Alamá, P., et al. A genomic diagnostic tool for human endometrial receptivity based on the transcriptomic signature. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(1):5060.e15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cozzolino, M., Diáz-Gimeno, P., Pellicer, A., Garrido, N.. Use of the endometrial receptivity array to guide personalized embryo transfer after a failed transfer attempt was associated with a lower cumulative and per transfer live birth rate during donor and autologous cycles. Fertil Steril. 2022;118(4):724–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doyle, N., Jahandideh, S., Hill, M. J., Widra, E. A., Levy, M., Devine, K.. Effect of timing by endometrial receptivity testing vs standard timing of frozen embryo transfer on live birth in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2022;328(21):2117–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Enciso, M., Carrascosa, J. P., Sarasa, J., Martínez-Ortiz, P. A., Munné, S., Horcajadas, J. A. et al. Development of a new comprehensive and reliable endometrial receptivity map (ER Map/ER Grade) based on RT-qPCR gene expression analysis. Hum Reprod. 2018;33(2):220–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dubowy, R. L., Feinberg, R. F., Keefe, D. L., Doncel, G. F., Williams, S. C., McSweet, J. C.. Improved endometrial assessment using cyclin E and p27. Fertil Steril. 2003;80(1):146–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kliman, H. J., McSweet, J. C., Grunert, G. M., Cardone, V. R. S., Cadesky, K., Keefe, D. L.. The endometrial function test (EFT) directs care and predicts ART outcome. Fertil Steril. 2002;78:S17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans-Hoeker, E., Lessey, B. A., Jeong, J. W., Savaris, R. F., Palomino, W. A., Yuan, L., et al. Endometrial BCL6 overexpression in eutopic endometrium of women with endometriosis. Reprod Sci. 2016;23(9):1234–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Almquist, L. D., Likes, C. E., Stone, B., Brown, K. R., Savaris, R., Forstein, D. A.. Endometrial BCL6 testing for the prediction of in vitro fertilization outcomes: a cohort study. Fertil Steril. 2017;108(6):1063–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Likes, C. E., Cooper, L. J., Efird, J., Forstein, D. A., Miller, P. B., Savaris, R., et al. Medical or surgical treatment before embryo transfer improves outcomes in women with abnormal endometrial BCL6 expression. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019;36(3):483–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×