Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Foreword
- Part I Cheirogaleidae: evolution, taxonomy, and genetics
- Part II Methods for studying captive and wild cheirogaleids
- Part III Cheirogaleidae: behavior and ecology
- Part IV Cheirogaleidae: sensory ecology, communication, and cognition
- Part V Cheirogaleidae: conservation biogeography
- 23 Ecological niche modeling of mouse lemurs (Microcebus spp.) and its implications for their species diversity and biogeography
- 24 Edge effects on tree dendrometrics, abiotics, and mouse lemur densities in western dry forests in Madagascar
- 25 Factors determining Microcebus abundance in a fragmented landscape in Ankarafantsika National Park, Madagascar
- 26 Can behavioral ecology help to understand the divergent geographic range sizes of mouse lemurs?
- 27 Conservation biology of the Cheirogaleidae: future research directions
- Index
- Plate section
- References
23 - Ecological niche modeling of mouse lemurs (Microcebus spp.) and its implications for their species diversity and biogeography
from Part V - Cheirogaleidae: conservation biogeography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 March 2016
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Foreword
- Part I Cheirogaleidae: evolution, taxonomy, and genetics
- Part II Methods for studying captive and wild cheirogaleids
- Part III Cheirogaleidae: behavior and ecology
- Part IV Cheirogaleidae: sensory ecology, communication, and cognition
- Part V Cheirogaleidae: conservation biogeography
- 23 Ecological niche modeling of mouse lemurs (Microcebus spp.) and its implications for their species diversity and biogeography
- 24 Edge effects on tree dendrometrics, abiotics, and mouse lemur densities in western dry forests in Madagascar
- 25 Factors determining Microcebus abundance in a fragmented landscape in Ankarafantsika National Park, Madagascar
- 26 Can behavioral ecology help to understand the divergent geographic range sizes of mouse lemurs?
- 27 Conservation biology of the Cheirogaleidae: future research directions
- Index
- Plate section
- References
Summary
Introduction
Recent studies of lemur species diversity have particularly focused on mouse lemurs (Cheirogaleidae: Microcebus) – small, nocturnal, and superficially monotypic creatures (Radespiel et al., 2012; Zimmermann and Radespiel, 2014). Microcebus are widespread across the diverse habitats of Madagascar, and are present in primary, secondary, and disturbed forest types where suitable area remains (Mittermeier et al., 2010). Until the end of the last century, it was assumed that diversity in mouse lemurs consisted only of two morphologically and geographically distinct species – a larger, grayish western morph, Microcebus murinus, and a smaller, reddish eastern species, M. rufus (Mittermeier et al., 1994). Each of these species was thought to have a broad distribution, encompassing a relatively diverse array of climates and habitats. In addition, mouse lemurs were believed to have largely allopatric distributions, with very little, if any, sympatry observed. However, the number of recognized mouse lemur species on Madagascar has vastly increased in recent years with an emphasis on methods to delineate cryptic species in the field (Mittermeier et al., 2010). There are currently 21 formally described species of mouse lemur, including some taxa that have sympatric distributions (Zimmermann and Radespiel, 2014).
Some controversy exists over the taxonomic validity over the newly named species, associated in large part with problems of sample size and geographic coverage, and difficulty in distinguishing clinal variation from distinct phylogenetic species (Tattersall, 2007; Markolf et al., 2011). Although cryptic species are often differentiated solely on the basis of genetics (Pastorini et al., 2001; Olivieri et al., 2007; Horvath et al., 2008; Groeneveld et al., 2009; Weisrock et al., 2012), integrative studies of primate taxonomy have recently used diet, social system, communication signals, sleeping site ecology, and reproductive behavior to delineate species boundaries (Kamilar, 2006; Radespiel et al., 2006; Zimmermann, 2013; Zimmermann and Radespiel, 2014). Such studies have demonstrated that sympatric species of Microcebus coexist in several regions of Madagascar (Yoder et al., 2005; Weisrock et al., 2010; Rasoloarison et al., 2013). Thus, mouse lemurs provide an excellent opportunity to investigate the evolutionary and ecological mechanisms that allow species to coexist.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Dwarf and Mouse Lemurs of MadagascarBiology, Behavior and Conservation Biogeography of the Cheirogaleidae, pp. 449 - 461Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2016
References
- 17
- Cited by