Summary
There is one fact which not even the dreamiest of egoists can doubt, and that is, his own existence. Here at least knowledge is absolute. I exist: this is certain. But how did I come to exist? I live: how did life begin? The question is one to which every man is bound to find a reasonable answer. To say I am descended through generations numbered or innumerable from a first man, is merely to put the difficulty back. Where did the first man come from? Religion answers in one word — Creation. But this is to cut the knot, as it were, without even an attempt to untie it. It must not be taken for granted that man is in capable of reasoning out the problem of his own existence.
Between the higher organisms and the lowest there is a gulf which might well be regarded as impassable. But closer observation and fuller knowledge will disclose the fact that between these extremes there are unnumbered gradations of development, and that the distance between the several steps in the series is such as might be passed by the operation of known laws. The problem, therefore, which religion would solve by the one word “creation,” science answers by the one word “evolution.” And science claims priority of audience.
But, as we proceed, let us not forget to reflect, hesitate, doubt; and, above all, let us cast away prejudice.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- A Doubter's Doubts about Science and ReligionBy a Criminal Lawyer, pp. 6 - 19Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2009First published in: 1889