Book contents
- Donor-Linked Families in the Digital Age
- Donor-Linked Families in the Digital Age
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Donor-Conceived Families
- Part I ‘DIY’ Donor Linking: Issues and Implications
- Part II Children’s and Adults’ Lived Experiences in Diverse Donor-Linked Families
- Part III Institutionalised Resistance to Openness
- Chapter 12 Knowing Origins
- Chapter 13 Donor Anonymity and the Rights of Donor-Conceived People in Japan
- Chapter 14 Donor Linking in the Digital Age
- Index
- References
Chapter 13 - Donor Anonymity and the Rights of Donor-Conceived People in Japan
from Part III - Institutionalised Resistance to Openness
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 July 2023
By
Book contents
- Donor-Linked Families in the Digital Age
- Donor-Linked Families in the Digital Age
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Donor-Conceived Families
- Part I ‘DIY’ Donor Linking: Issues and Implications
- Part II Children’s and Adults’ Lived Experiences in Diverse Donor-Linked Families
- Part III Institutionalised Resistance to Openness
- Chapter 12 Knowing Origins
- Chapter 13 Donor Anonymity and the Rights of Donor-Conceived People in Japan
- Chapter 14 Donor Linking in the Digital Age
- Index
- References
Summary
In Japan, research on issues of donor conception has been accumulating for several decades, and the need for legislation concerning donor conception is now recognized. Since the early 2000s, donor-conceived individuals have begun to speak out for the right to know their biological origin, and the general public has come to understand the importance of this right. However, until recently, no relevant law or legal regulation existed in Japan. This chapter (1) introduces the historical and cultural background of sperm donor anonymity in Japan; (2) reviews the positions of various government committees since the late 1990s; (3) provides an overview of how donor offspring, parents, and intended parents of donor-conceived children have dealt with the issues; and (4) discusses the reasons for the slow pace of legislation and the Japanese government’s failure to recognize the right of donor offspring to obtain donor information.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Donor-Linked Families in the Digital AgeRelatedness and Regulation, pp. 229 - 248Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
References
Achilles, R. (1993). Protection from what? The secret life of donor insemination. Politics and the Life Sciences, 12(2), 171–172. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0730938400023996Google Scholar
Allan, S. (2017), Donor Conception and the Search for Information from Secrecy and Anonymity to Openness. Routledge.Google Scholar
Ando, K. (1949). Funinshō ni taisuru Shindan oyobi Chiryō no Shinpo (Advances in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Infertility). Nihon Rinshō 7(4), 217–221.Google Scholar
Ando, K. (1960). Jinkō jusei no jissi jotai (The present performance of artificial insemination), in Koike, R., Tanaka, M., & Hitomi, Y. (Eds.), Jinkō jusei no shomondai: Sono Jittai to Hōteki Sokumen (pp. 9–24). Tokyo: Hōgaku Kenkyu-kai, Keio University.Google Scholar
Anonymous, (2003, December 25). Teikōseishi de tanjyō no gō josei rainichi, omoi kataru (Australian donor-conceived woman speaks her thoughts in Japan), Gifu Shimbun.Google Scholar
Anonymous, (2004, September 11). Seishi teikyōsha wo shiru kenri wo (We want the right to know sperm donors), Mainichi Shimbun.Google Scholar
Anonymous, (2014, April 27). Life Score 3: Jinsei no gakufu 3: Ranshi teikyō, susumanu hōseibi, “Ranshi” motomete kaigai he wataru joseitachi (Life Score 3: Egg donation, lack of progress in legislation, women going overseas to seek “eggs”), Nikkei West, www.sankei.com/west/news/140427/wst1404270075-n1.html (last accessed May 31, 2022).Google Scholar
Anonymous, (2020, December 7). Giron kaishi kara rippōka made 20nen. Seishoku hojoiryōhō seiritsu ha naze okuretaka (Why was the enactment of the Assisted Reproductive Technology Law delayed? Twenty years from the start of discussion to legislation), Mainichi Shimbun, https://mainichi.jp/articles/20201207/k00/00m/040/256000c (last accessed June 1, 2022).Google Scholar
Asahi Home & Welfare Weekly (Katei Asahi) (1949, September 10). Jinkōjusei mondai no hihan (Criticism of artificial insemination), 10.1–2.Google Scholar
Castro-Vàzquez, G. (2017). Intimacy and Reproductive in Contemporary Japan. Routledge.Google Scholar
Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. (2013). Informing offspring of their conception by gamete or embryo donation: a committee opinion. Fertility and Sterility, 100(1), 45–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.02.028Google Scholar
Fahey, R. (2022, January 13). A Tokyo-based mum is suing the sperm donor she had sex with to conceive her second child for fraud, Mirror Online, www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/woman-puts-baby-up-adoption-25938939 (last accessed June 1, 2022).Google Scholar
Hibino, Y. & Allan, S. (2020). Absence of laws regarding sperm and oocyte donation in Japan and the impacts on donors, parents, and the people born as a result. Reproductive Medicine and Biology, 19(3), 295–298. https://doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12329Google Scholar
Higashi, K. (2017). Nihon ni okeru rezubian mazā (Lesbian mother in Japan). IGS Project Series No. 17 2016 nendo Seishoku iryō de keiseisareru tayōna kazoku to tōjisha no uerubi-ing wo kangaeru kenkyūkai houkokusho, Institute for Gender Studies, Ochanomizu University: 28–41. www2.igs.ocha.ac.jp/ips/ips-17/ (last accessed November 10, 2021).Google Scholar
Indekeu, A., Dierickx, K., Schotsmans, P., Daniels, K. R., Rober, P., & D’Hooghe, T. (2013). (2013) Factors contributing to parental decision-making in disclosing donor conception: a systematic review, Human Reproduction, 19(6), 714–733. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmt018Google Scholar
Kuji, N. et al. (2000). Teikyo seishi ni yori kodomowo eta nihonjin fufu no kokuchi ni taisuru iken ni kansuru kenkyū (Survey of attitudes of male infertile patients who have a child via DI). Japanese Journal of Fertility and Sterility 45(3): 219–225.Google Scholar
Kuji, N. et al. (2005). Wagakuni ni okeru seishi teikyōsha no ‘shutsuji wo shiru kenri’ ni taisuru ishiki chosa (Survey of sperm donors’ attitudes toward ‘the right to know of donor offspring’ in Japan). Health and Labor Sciences Research Grant: http://admin7.aiiku.or.jp/~doc/houkoku/h16/62795070.pdfGoogle Scholar
Kokado, M. (2015). A new phase in the regulation of assisted reproductive technology in Japan. Zeitschrift für Japanisches Recht, 20(40), 211–232.Google Scholar
Kusaka, K., Shimizu, K., & Nagaoki, S. (2006). Hi haigūshakan jinkōjusei de umareta hito no shinri (The identification of children born through AID). Language, Culture and Communication 37, 93–101.Google Scholar
Mainichi Shimbun Online (2020, December 5). Seishoku iryōho seiritsu: Mazu ippo ‘Kūhaku no 20 nen’ kurikaesanai tameni (Reproductive Medicine Act passed: First step to avoid repeating blank 20 years), https://mainichi.jp/articles/20201205/k00/00m/040/062000c (last accessed June 1, 2022).Google Scholar
Matsuo, Y. (2014, November 6). Dairi shussan, jinkō jusei, IVF… Seishokuiryō no giron kara nigeruna (Do not run away from the debate on reproductive medicine), Tokyo Express, http://tokyoexpress.info/2014/11/06/%e4%bb%a3%e7%90%86%e5%87%ba%e7%94%a3%e3%80%81%e4%ba%ba%e5%b7%a5%e6%8e%88%e7%b2%be%e3%80%81%e4%bd%93%e5%a4%96%e5%8f%97%e7%b2%be%e3%80%82%e7%94%9f%e6%ae%96%e5%8c%bb%e7%99%82%e3%81%ae%e8%ad%b0/ (last accessed November 10, 2021).Google Scholar
Miyazima, A. (2017). Seishokuiryō to datsu “shutuji” shakai (Assisted Reproductive Technology and an Escape from the Society of Respecting “Biological” Origin). Tokyo: Health System Kenkyusho.Google Scholar
Motomura, Y. (2003, November 24). “Chichi” sagasu jinkō juseiji no ko (DI Offspring is looking for “biological father”), Mainichi Shimbun.Google Scholar
Nagamizu, Y. (2021). Arubeki seishoku hojoiryō hōsei wo megutte kentō subeki kadai (In search of an appropriate policy on regulating assisted reproductive technologies and ascertaining the parentage of children born as a result of ART). Momoyama Gakuho, 35(21). www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/momoyamahougaku/35/0/35_1/_pdf (last accessed November 10, 2021).Google Scholar
Nezu, Y., & Sawami, R. (2009) Haha to musume no dairi shussan (Surrogacy between mother and daughter), Haru shobō.Google Scholar
Ninomiya, S. (2010). Kodomo no shiru kenri nitsuite (Donor children’s right to know). Gakujutsu no Dōkō, 15(5), 40–45.Google Scholar
Nomura, M. (2018, October 30). Daisansha teikyo no jinkō jusei chūshi: Keio byōin kokunaino hansū jisshi (Keio University Hospital which had been performing half of DI in Japan discontinue DI), Yomiuri Shimbun, Morning edition, p. 32.Google Scholar
Ono, T., Kaneko, S., & Tanabe, K. (2004) Shutsuji wo shiru kenri – Hitoku to Kaiji (Right to know – Confidentiality and disclosure). Sanfujinka no Sekai, 56(2), 113–119.Google Scholar
Osaki, T. (2020, December 27). “DM if interested”: Sperm donors in Japan operate in a gray zone, The Japan Times, www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2020/12/27/national/science-health/japan-sperm-donors/ (last accessed November 10, 2021).Google Scholar
Saimura, M. (2008). Kodomo no jinken shingai to sōsharu wāku (Human rights violation against donor children and social work). In Saimura, M. ed., Seishoku hojoiryō de umareta kodomo no shutsuji wo shiru kenri (Right to Know of Donor Children), 264–281 Tokyo: Fukumura Publisher.Google Scholar
Semba, Y. et al. (2006). AID ni okeru “shutsuji wo shiru kenri: AID de umareta hitotachi ga motomeru teikyō jyōhō toha (The “right to know” in AID: Donor information sought by AID offspring). Seimei Rinri: Journal of Japan Association for Bioethics, 17(1), 147–153.Google Scholar
Semba, Y., Chang, C., Hong, H., Kamisato, A., Kokado, M., & Muto, K. (2010). Surrogacy: donor conception regulation in Japan. Bioethics, 24(7), 348–357. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2009.01780.xGoogle Scholar
Shimizu, K., Kusaka, K. & Nagaoki, S. (2007) The experiences of women who decided to use DI (Japanese: Hi haigushakan) Journal of Japanese Society of Fertility Nursing, 4(1), 16–25.Google Scholar
Shimizu, K. (2020). Kokuchi ni taisuru oya no omoi – Oya no kai no jissen kara (Parents’ thoughts on telling truth – From the activities of parents’ groups). In Watashitachi ga taisetsu ni shitai mono: AID de kazoku ni natta hitotachi no kokuchi heno omoi to jissen kara (Parents’ thoughts on telling: through the activities of self-support group of parents. Story of Our Family). Tokyo: JSPS, 145–153.Google Scholar
Wakabayshi, M., & Horioka, C. Y. (2006). Is the eldest son different? The residential choice of siblings in Japan. NBER Working Paper Series. www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w12655/w12655.pdf (last accessed November 10, 2021).Google Scholar
Yamagata, N., Hoshi, K., Hirata, S., et al. (2003). Seishoku hojoiryō nitsuiteno ishiki chōsa 2003 Shūkei kekka (The survey of public attitudes towards donor conception 2003). www.mhlw.go.jp/wp/kenkyu/db/tokubetu02/index.html (last accessed November 10, 2021).Google Scholar
Yamamoto, N., Hirata, T., Izumi, G., Nakazawa, A., Fukuda, S., Neriishi, K., Arakawa, T., Masashi Takamura, M., Harada, M., Hirota, Y. Koga, K., Wada-Hiraike, O., Fujii, T., Irahara, M. & Osuga, Y. (2018). A survey of public attitudes towards third-party reproduction in Japan in 2014. PLOS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198499Google Scholar
Yanaihara, T., & Yamagata, N. (1999). Survey on patient awareness of assisted reproductive technology: National survey (in Japanese, Seishoku hojoiryō ni taisuru kanja no ishiki ni kansuru kenkyū). Report on 1999 Children and Home Comprehensive Research Project (Grant-in-Aid from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS)) www.niph.go.jp/wadai/mhlw/1999/h1118028.pdf (last accessed November 10, 2021).Google Scholar
Yokota, A, & Watanabe, R. (2020, December 7). Giron kaishi kara rippōka made 20 nen: Seishoku Iryōhō ha naze okuretaka) (20 years from the start of discussions to legislation: Why did it take so long for Assisted Medicine Act to be passed?), Mainichi Shimbun Online, https://mainichi.jp/articles/20201207/k00/00m/040/256000c (last accessed June 1, 2022).Google Scholar
Yomiuri Shimbun Online (2021, April 16). SNS de seishi torihiki ga kyūzō: Funin fūfura riyō, kisei naku muhō jōtai (Sperm donation on SNS are increasing rapidly. Used by infertile couples, no legal regulations); www.yomiuri.co.jp/national/20210416-OYT1T50093/ (last accessed November 10, 2021).Google Scholar
Yui, H. (2011). Hi-haigushakan jinkō jusei niyotte shushō shitaka hito no raifu sutorī (A life story of a person conceived through artificial insemination by donor). Ritsumekan Ningen Kagaku Kenkyū, 24, 35–48.Google Scholar
Yui, H. (2012). Nihon hatsu no jinkō jusei seikōrei ni kansuru rekishiteki kentō: Ishi no gensetsu wo chūshin ni (A history study about first experience of successful artificial insemination in Japan: An analysis of doctors’ statements), Core Ethics, 8, 423–432.Google Scholar
Yui, H. (2015). Jinkō jusei no kindai (Modern History of Artificial Insemination), Tokyo: Seikyusha.Google Scholar
Yui, H. (2021). A history of Japanese follow-up surveys of children conceived through artificial insemination by donor: The evidence of “superior” children and positive eugenics. EASTS, 16, 50-69. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4498171/pdf/FVVinObGyn-7-137-143.pdfGoogle Scholar