Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T20:38:49.680Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

19 - Dog population management

from PART IV - LIFE ON THE MARGINS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 December 2016

Elly F. Hiby
Affiliation:
Cambridge, UK
Lex R. Hiby
Affiliation:
Cambridge, UK
James Serpell
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Dogs enjoy a unique niche within a human dominated ecology. Fulfilling a range of roles, they are a part of human society around the world. There is an estimated worldwide dog population of 500–700 million distributed unevenly throughout the human population (Hughes & MacDonald, 2013; Matter & Daniels, 2000). Ratios of dogs to humans can vary from a reported 1:1.1 in the Philippines (Beran, 1982) to 1:45 in Zambia (de Balogh et al., 1993). However, for most populations the ratio is between 1:3 and 1:10 (Davlin & VonVille, 2012).

As the first species to be domesticated, dogs have developed the most intimate and complex relationship with humans (Serpell, 1996). The closeness of this relationship means that dogs are uniquely dependent on humans, with a severely limited ability to survive and reproduce in their absence (MacDonald & Carr, Chapter 16; Boitani et al., Chapter 17). It also means that they are vulnerable to any changes in this relationship that may accompany changes in human society, a notable example being urbanization. Bradshaw (2011) describes today's pet dogs as being on the verge of a crisis, struggling to meet the demands of being well-behaved urban pets when they have, until very recently, been bred for a rural working lifestyle. One consequence of urbanization, highly visible outside of Western Europe and North America, is the presence of dogs roaming on city streets, also known sometimes as stray, street or free-roaming dogs. The presence of roaming dogs can bring a range of problems, including disease risks, nuisance behaviors and welfare problems, not least through road traffic accidents. The methods used to control the population, even where efforts are made to reduce animal suffering, may also present an unacceptable situation to society. These issues, plus others, provide the motivation for humane dog population management.

The structure of the dog population is also complex. Figure 19.1, copied from ICAM Coalition (2007), illustrates the division of the population into a number of subpopulations and the routes of transition between those subpopulations. The diagram shows how a roaming dog may be a survivor of a litter born to a roaming female “on the street,” an owned dog not currently confined, or a dog that was once owned but has been abandoned.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Domestic Dog
Its Evolution, Behavior and Interactions with People
, pp. 385 - 403
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agung, G. P., Hampson, K., Girardi, J. et al. (2013). Response to a rabies epidemic in Bali, Indonesia. Emerging Infectious Diseases Dispatch, 19: 648–51.Google Scholar
American Pet Products Association (APPA) (2008). National Pet Owners Survey 2007–2008. [Online]. Available: www.americanpetproducts.org
Bancroft, R. L. (1974). America's Mayors and Councilmen: their problems and frustrations. Nation's Cities, 12: 14–22.Google Scholar
Beran, G. W. (1982). Ecology of dogs in the Central Philippines in relation to rabies control efforts. Comparative Immunology, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, 5: 265–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bradshaw, J. S. (2011). In Defense of Dogs. London: Penguin Books. Google Scholar
Briggs, J. & Rhodes, L. (2010). Non-surgical sterilization: priorities and challenges (abstract). Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Non-Surgical Contraceptive Methods of Pet Population Control, Dallas, Texas, April 8–10.Google Scholar
Bronden, L. B., Nielsen, S. S., Toft, N. & Kristensen, A. T. (2010). Data from the Danish veterinary cancer registry on the occurrence and distribution of neoplasms in dogs in Denmark. Veterinary Record, 166: 586–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carding, A. H. (1969). The significance and dynamics of stray dog populations with special reference to the UK and Japan. Journal of Small Animal Practice, 10: 419–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chawla, S. K. & Reece, J. F. (2002). Timing of oestrus and reproductive behaviour in Indian street dogs. Veterinary Record, 150: 450–1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dalla Villa, P., Kahn, S., Stuardo, L. et al. (2010). Free-roaming dog control among OIE-member countries. Preventive Veterinary Medecine, 97: 58–63.Google ScholarPubMed
Davlin, S. L. & VonVille, H. M. (2012). Canine rabies vaccination and domestic dog population characteristics in the developing world: a systematic review. Vaccine, 30: 3492–502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Balogh, K. K., Wandeler, A. I., Meslin, F. X. (1993). A dog ecology study in an urban and a semi-rural area of Zambia. Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research, 60(4): 437–43.Google Scholar
Flores-Ibarra, M. & Estrella-Valenzuela, G. (2004). Canine ecology and socioeconomic factors associated with dogs unvaccinated against rabies in a Mexican city across the US-Mexico border. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 62: 79–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, J. M. & Carlisle-Frank, P. L. (2007). Analysis of programs to reduce overpopulation of companion animals: do adoption and low-cost spay/neuter programs merely cause substitution of sources? Ecological Economics, 62: 740–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hiby, L. R., Reece, J. F., Wright, R. et al. (2011). A mark-resight survey method to estimate the roaming dog population in three cities in Rajasthan, India. BMC Veterinary Research, 7: 46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hughes, J. & Macdonald, D. W. (2013). A review of the interactions between free-roaming domestic dogs and wildlife. Biological Conservation, 157: 341–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) (2012). U.S. shelter and adoption estimates for 2011–2012. [Online]. Available: www.humanesociety.org/issues/pet_overpopulation/facts/overpopulation_estimates.html [accessed May 2012].
International Companion Animal Management (ICAM) Coalition (2007). Humane dog population management guidance. [Online]. Available: www.icam-coalition.org [accessed May 2012].
International Companion Animal Management (ICAM) Coalition (2011). The welfare basis for euthanasia of dogs and cats and policy development. [Online]. Available: www.icam-coalition.org [accessed May 2012].
International Companion Animal Management (ICAM) Coalition (2015). Are we making a difference? A guide to monitoring and evaluating dog population and management interventions. [Online]. Available: www.icam-coalition.org [accessed September 11, 2016].
Knobel, D. L., Cleaveland, S., Coleman, P. G. et al. (2005). Re-evaluating the burden of rabies in Africa and Asia. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 83: 360–368.Google ScholarPubMed
Macpherson, C. N. L., Meslin, F. X. & Wandeler, A. I. (2012). Dogs, Zoonoses and Public Health, edition. Oxford and New York: CABI Publishing.Google Scholar
Marker, L. L., Dickman, A. J. & Macdonald, D. W. (2005). Perceived effectiveness of livestock-guarding dogs placed on Namibian farms. Rangeland Ecology & Management, 58: 329–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsh, P. (2010). Replacing Myth with Math: Using Evidence-based Programs to Eradicate Shelter Overpopulation. Concord, NH: Town and Country Reprographics. [Online]. Available: www.shelteroverpopulation.org [accessed May 2012].Google Scholar
Matter, H. C. & Daniels, T. J. (2000). Dog ecology and population biology. In Dogs, Zoonoses and Public Health, eds. Macpherson, C. N. L., Meslin, F. X. & Wandeler, A. I.. Wallingford, UK: CABI International, pp. 17–62.Google Scholar
Matter, H. C., Wandeler, A. I., Neuenschwander, B. E., Harischandra, L. P. & Meslin, F. X. (2000). Study of the dog population and the rabies control activities in the Mirigama area of Sri Lanka. Acta Tropica, 75: 95–108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) (2011). Cattle Death Loss Report, released May 12, 2011. [Online]. Available: www.nass.usda.gov/Publications/Reports_By_Title/index.asp [accessed May 2014].
National Animal Welfare Advisory Committee (2010). Animal Welfare (Dogs) Code of Welfare 2010. Wellington: Animal Welfare Directorate, MAF Biosecurity New Zealand.
OIE (2013). Stray dog population control. Terrestrial Animal Health Code, chapter 7.7. [Online]. Available: www.oie.int/index.php?id=169&L=0&htmfile=chapitre_1.7.7.htm [accessed May 2014].
Ozanne-Smith, J., Ashby, K. & Stathakis, V. Z. (2001). Dog bite and injury prevention – analysis, critical review, and research agenda. Injury Prevention, 7: 321–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Randall, D. A., Marino, J., Haydon, D. T. et al. (2006). An integrated disease management strategy for the control of rabies in Ethiopian wolves. Biological Conservation, 131: 151–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reece, J. F. & Chawla, S. K. (2006). Control of rabies in Jaipur, India, by the sterilization and vaccination of neighbourhood dogs. The Veterinary Record, 159: 379–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reece, J. F., Chawla, S. K., Hiby, E. F. & Hiby, L.R. (2008). Fecundity and longevity of roaming dogs in Jaipur, India. BMC Veterinary Research, 4: 6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reece, J. F., Chawla, S. K. & Hiby, A. R. (2013). Decline in human dog-bite cases during a street dog sterilization program in Jaipur, India. The Veterinary Record, 172(18): 473–6. http://doi:10.1136/vr.101079 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowan, A. & Williams, J. (1987). The success of companion animal management programs: a review. Anthrozoos, 1: 110–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
RSPCA (2010). Improving dog ownership: the economic case for dog licensing. [Online]. Available: www.rspca.org.uk/ImageLocator/LocateAsset?asset=document&assetId=1232721594783&mode=prd [accessed May 2012].
Scarlett, J. M. (2004). Pet population dynamics and animal shelter issues. In Shelter Medicine for Veterinarians and Staff, eds. Miller, L. & Zawistowski, S.. Ames, IA: Blackwell, pp. 11–24.Google Scholar
Serpell, J. (1996). In the Company of Animals: A Study of Human–Animal Relationships, edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sudarshan, M. K., Mahendra, B. J. & Narayan, D. H. (2001). A community survey of dog bites: anti-rabies treatment, rabies and dog population management in Bangalore City. Journal of Communicable Diseases, 33: 245–51.Google ScholarPubMed
Suzuki, K., Pereira, J. A., Frias, L. A. et al. (2008). Rabies vaccination coverage and profiles of the owned-dog population in Santa Cruz de la Sierra, Bolivia. Zoonoses and Public Health 55: 77–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vallat, B. (2011). The OIE's commitment to fight rabies worldwide. Rabies: a priority for humans and animals. OIE Bulletin, 3: 1–2.Google Scholar
Wandeler, A. I., Budde, A., Capt, S., Kappeler, A. & Matter, H. C. (1988). Dog ecology and dog rabies control. Reviews of Infectious Diseases, 10: S684–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wandeler, A. I., Matter, H. C., Kappeler, A. & Budde, A. (1993). The ecology of dogs and canine rabies: a selective review. Revue Scientifique et Technique (International Office of Epizootics), 12: 51–71.Google ScholarPubMed
Wenstrup, J. & Dowidchuk, A. (1999). Pet overpopulation: data and measurement issues in shelters. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 2: 303–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
World Health Organization (WHO) (1988). Report of the WHO Consultation on Dog Ecology Studies Related to Rabies Control. WHO/Rab.Res/88.25
World Health Organization (WHO) (2005). Expert Consultation on Rabies: First Report. Technical Report Series, 931. Geneva: WHO.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×