Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T16:31:26.668Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

17 - Conclusions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 October 2009

Robert E. Goodin
Affiliation:
Australian National University, Canberra
James Mahmud Rice
Affiliation:
Australian National University, Canberra
Antti Parpo
Affiliation:
Somero Social & Health Services
Lina Eriksson
Affiliation:
Australian National University, Canberra
Get access

Summary

Major findings

In concluding, let us begin by summarizing the main findings of the book in bullet-point fashion:

  • People have more temporal autonomy than we might imagine. ‘Spare time’, as conventionally measured (time not actually spent in paid labour, unpaid household labour or personal care) constitutes less than half of people's true discretionary time (time they did not strictly need to spend in those activities) (see Figure 5.1).

  • People's temporal autonomy depends mostly on whether or not they have children, and whether or not they have a partner to help with the children. Lone parents have vastly less discretionary time than dual-earner couples without children – more than 40 hours a week less in the most extreme case, the US (see Figure 3.2). Looking just at ‘spare time’, in which respect the two groups are about the same, would mask that fact (see Figure 5.5).

  • In general, women have less – but generally only a little less – temporal autonomy than men. However, stay-at-home wives, even with children, have much more – over 9 hours more – discretionary time than breadwinning fathers, on average (see Figure 14.2). Again, looking just at ‘spare time’, in which respect the two groups are about the same, would mask that fact (see Figure 5.7).

  • Temporal autonomy varies widely from one country to another. In Sweden, where discretionary time is highest, people have over 9 more hours a week than in France, where it is lowest (see Figure 3.1).

  • Temporal autonomy varies with welfare and gender regimes. On average, people have 5 hours more discretionary time in social-democratic/female-friendly welfare/gender regimes than in either liberal/individualist or corporatist/traditionalist regimes (see Figure 8.1).

  • […]

Type
Chapter
Information
Discretionary Time
A New Measure of Freedom
, pp. 261 - 270
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×