Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T01:00:27.876Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - Acoustic Characteristics of Infant-directed Speech as a Function of Prosodic Typology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 November 2016

Jeffrey Heinz
Affiliation:
University of Delaware
Rob Goedemans
Affiliation:
Universiteit Leiden
Harry van der Hulst
Affiliation:
University of Connecticut
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albin, Drema D. & Echols, Catharine H.. 1996. Stressed and word-final syllables in infant-directed speech. Infant Behavior and Development 19, 401418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barry, Jonanthan G. & Blamey, Peter J.. 2004. The acoustic analysis of tone differentiation as a means for assessing tone production in speakers of Cantonese. Journal of Acoustic Society of America 116, 17391748.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benders, Titia. 2013. Mommy is only happy! Dutch mothers’ realisation of speech sounds in infant-directed speech expresses emotion, not didactic intent. Infant Behavior and Development 36, 847862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein Ratner, Nan & Luberoff, Arlene. 1984. Cues to post-vocalic voicing in mother-child speech. Journal of Phonetics 12, 285289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boll-Avetisyan, Natalie & Kager, Rene. 2014. OCP-Place in speech segmentation. Language and Speech 57, 394421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradlow, Ann R., Torretta, Gina M. & Pisoni, David B.. 1996. Intelligibility of normal speech I: Global and fine-grained acoustic-phonetic talker characteristics. Speech Communication 20, 255272.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burnham, Denis, Kitamura, Christine & Vollmer-Conna, Uté. 2002. What’s new, pussycat? On talking to babies and animals. Science 296, 1435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan, Chakraborti, Paromita, Jung, Dagmar & Scheibman, Joanne. 1998. Prosody and segmental effect: some paths of evolution for word stress. Studies in Language 22, 267314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Church, Robyn. 2002. Prosodic Modification in Infant-Directed Speech. Doctoral dissertation, University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
Cooper, Robin P. & Aslin, Richard N.. 1990. Preference for infant-directed speech in the first month after birth. Child Development 61, 15841595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cristia, Alejandrina. 2013. Input to language: The phonetics and perception of infant-directed speech. Language and Linguistics Compass 7, 157170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutler, Anne & Foss, Donald J.. 1977. On the role of sentence stress in sentence processing. Language and Speech 20, 110.Google Scholar
Cutler, Anne Cutler, Anne & Norris, Dennis. 1988. The role of strong syllables in segmentation for lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 14, 113121.Google Scholar
Delattre, Pierre. 1966. A comparison of syllable length conditioning among languages. International Review of Applied Linguistics 4, 183198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ding, Picus S. 2006. A typological study of tonal systems of Japanese and Prinmi: Towards a definition of pitch-accent languages. Journal of Universal Language 7, 135.Google Scholar
Dodane, Christelle & Al-Tamimi, Jalaleddin. 2007. An acoustic comparison of vowel systems in adult-directed-speech and child-directed-speech: evidence from French, English & Japanese. Paper presented at 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Saarbrucken, Germany.Google Scholar
Englund, Kjellrun & Behne, Dawn. 2006. Changes in infant directed speech in the first six months. Infant and Child Development 15, 139160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernald, Anne. 1985. Four-month-old infants prefer to listen to motherese. Infant Behavior and Development 8, 181195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernald, Anne. 1989. Intonation and communicative intent in mothers’ speech to infants: Is the melody the message? Child Development 60, 14971510.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fernald, Anne. 1993. Approval and disapproval: Infant responsiveness to vocal affect in familiar and unfamiliar languages. Child Development 64, 657674.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fernald, Anne & K. Kuhl, Patricia. 1987. Acoustic determinants of infant preference for motherese speech. Infant Behavior and Development 10, 279293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernald, Anne, et al. 1989. A cross-language study of prosodic modifications in mothers’ and fathers’ speech to preverbal infants. Journal of Child Language 16, 477501.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fry, Dennis B. 1958. Experiments in the perception of stress. Language and Speech 1, 126152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Matthew. 2004. A phonological and phonetic study of word-level stress in Chickasaw. International Journal of American Linguistics 70, 132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Matthew. 2014. Disentangling stress and pitch accent: Toward a typology of prominence at different prosodic levels. In Harry van der Hulst (ed.), Word Stress: Theoretical and Typological Issues, 83118. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Matthew & Applebaum, Ayla. 2010. Acoustic correlates of stress in Turkish Kabardian. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 40, 3558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grieser, DiAnne L. & Kuhl, Patricia K.. 1988. Maternal speech to infants in a tonal language: Support for universal prosodic features in motherese. Developmental Psychology 24, 1420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grosjean, François & Gee, James P.. 1987. Prosodic structure and spoken word recognition. Cognition 25, 135155.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hayes, Bruce. 1995. Metrical Stress Theory: Principles and Case Studies. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Hulst, Harry van der. 2014. Word stress: Past, present and future. In van der Hulst, Harry (ed.), Word Stress: Theoretical and Typological Issues, 355. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyman, Larry M. 2009. How (not) to do phonological typology: The case of pitch-accent. Language Sciences 31, 213238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyman, Larry M. 2014. Do all languages have word accent? In Van der Hulst, Harry (ed.), Word Stress: Theoretical and Typological Issues, 5682. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Igarashi, Yosuke. 2014. Typology of intonational phrasing in Japanese dialects. In Jun, Sun-Ah (ed.), Prosodic Typology, vol. 2. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ishihara, Takeshi. 2006. Tonal Alignment in Tokyo Japanese. Doctoral dissertation, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Johnson, Elizabeth K., Lahey, Mybeth, Ernestus, Mirjam & Cutler, Anne. 2013. A multimodal corpus of speech to infant and adult listeners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 134, EL534–EL40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jusczyk, Peter W., Houston, Derek M. & Newsome, Mary. 1999. The beginnings of word segmentation in English-learning infants. Cognitive Psychology 39, 159207.Google Scholar
Khaonoo, Krongkan. 1996. Infant Directed Speech in Thai. Master thesis, Chulalongkorn University.Google Scholar
Khouw, Edward & Ciocca, Valter. 2007. Perceptual correlates of Cantonese tones. Journal of Phonetics 35, 104117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitamura, Christine, Thanavishuth, Chayada, Burnham, Denis & Luksaneeyanawin, Sudaporn. 2002. Universality and specificity in infant-directed speech: Pitch modifications as a function of infant age and sex in a tonal and non-tonal language. Infant Behavior and Development 24, 372392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kondaurova, Maria V. & Bergeson, Tonya R.. 2011. The effects of age and infant hearing status on maternal use of prosodic cues for clause boundaries in speech. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 54, 740–754A.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kristoffersen, G. 2007. The Phonology of Norwegian. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kuhl, Patricia K., et al. 1997. Cross-language analysis of phonetic units in language addressed to infants. Science 277, 684686.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuo, Yu-Ching, Rosen, Stuart & Faulkner, Andrew. 2008. Acoustic cues to tonal contrasts in Mandarin: Implications for cochlear implants. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 123, 28152824.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lehiste, Ilse. 1970. Suprasegmentals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lin, Hwei-Bing. & Repp, Bruno H.. 1989. Cues to the perception of Taiwanese tones. Language and Speech 32, 2544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Huei-Mei, Kuhl, Patricia K. & Tsao, Feng-Ming. 2003. An association between mothers’ speech clarity and infants’ speech discrimination skills. Developmental Science 6, F1–F10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Huei-Mei, Tsao, Feng-Ming & Kuhl, Patricia K.. 2007. Acoustic analysis of lexical tone in Mandarin infant-directed speech. Developmental Psychology 43, 912917.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, Huei-Mei, Tsao, Feng-Ming Liu, Huei-Mei, Tsao, Feng-Ming & Kuhl, Patricia K.. 2009. Age-related changes in acoustic modifications of Mandarin maternal speech to preverbal infants and five-year-old children: A longitudinal study. Journal of Child Language 36, 909922.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luksaneeyanawin, Sudaporn. 1998. Intonation in Thai. In Intonation Systems: A Survey of Twenty Languages, eds. Hirst, D. & Di Cristo, A.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mazuka, Reiko, Igarashi, Yosuke & Nishikawa, Ken’ya. 2006. Input for learning Japanese: RIKEN Japanese Mother-Infant Conversation Corpus. Technical report of IEICE, TL2006-16 106, 1115.Google Scholar
McMurray, Bob, Kovack-Lesh, Kristine A., Goodwin, Dresden & McEchron, William. 2013. Infant directed speech and the development of speech perception: enhancing development or an unintended consequence? Cognition 129, 362378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Papoušek, Mechthild & Papoušek, Hanuš. 1981. Musical elements in the infant’s: vocalization: Their significance for communication, cognition, and creativity, vol. 1. Norwood: CT: Ablex.Google Scholar
Papoušek, Mechthild, Papoušek, Hanuš & Symmes, David. 1991. The meanings of melodies in motherese in tone and stress languages. Infant Behavior and Development 14, 415440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, Elinor, Post, Brechtje, Astruc, Lluisa & Prieto, Pilar. 2009. Rhythmic modification in child directed speech. Oxford Working Papers in Linguistics 12, 123144.Google Scholar
Shute, Brenda & Wheldall, Kevin. 1995. The incidence of raised average pitch and increased pitch variability in British “motherese” speech and the influence of maternal occupation and discourse form. First Language 15, 3555.Google Scholar
Snow, Catherine E. 1977. The development of conversation between mothers and babies. Journal of Child Language 4, 122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soderstrom, Melanie. 2007. Beyond babytalk: Re-evaluating the nature and content of speech input to preverbal infants. Developmental Review 27, 501532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, Irene, Athanasopoulou, Angeliki & Pincus, Nadya. 2016 (This volume). Prominence, contrast, and the functional load hypothesis: An acoustic investigation. In JHeinz, effrey, Goedemans, Rob, and van der Hulst, Harry (eds.), Dimensions of Phonological Stress, 123167. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Yuanyuan, Cristia, Alejandrina & Seidl, Amanda. 2015. Acoustic-phonetic differences between infant- and adult-directed speech: The role of stress and utterance position. Journal of Child Language 42, 821842.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xu Rattanasone, Nan, Burnham, Denis & Reilly, Ronan G.. 2013. Tone and vowel enhancement in Cantonese infant-directed speech at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months of age. Journal of Phonetics 41, 332343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yip, Moria. 2002. Tone. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×