Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 July 2015
Introduction
In the context of WTO jurisprudence, the term ‘municipal law’ is used interchangeably with the terms ‘national law’ and ‘domestic law’, in the same way that one finds these terms being used interchangeably elsewhere. WTO adjudicators have been confronted with a range of different issues relating to municipal law, one reason being that many of the measures challenged in WTO dispute settlement proceedings are municipal laws. The WTO agreements contain some specific provisions that speak to the relationship between those agreements and municipal law. For instance, Article XVI:4 of the WTO Agreement establishes that ‘[e]ach Member shall ensure the conformity of its laws, regulations and administrative procedures with its obligations as provided in the annexed Agreements’, and a small number of provisions in the covered agreements establish a ‘renvoi’ to each Member's national law to define certain terms. Otherwise, when confronted with questions relating to municipal law, WTO adjudicators have often fallen back on general international law concepts and principles of wider applicability. This chapter reviews WTO statements of wider applicability relating to: (i) the relevance of municipal law concepts and classifications to treaty interpretation; (ii) the invocation of municipal law as a justification for a failure to perform a treaty obligation; (iii) alleged violations of municipal law; (iv) the interpretation of municipal law by international tribunals; (v) the implementation of international obligations in municipal law; and (vi) representations made by a State regarding the operation of its municipal law.
Relevance of municipal law concepts and classifications to treaty interpretation
There are many examples of WTO adjudicators stating that a Member's municipal law concepts and classifications may be of limited relevance in the context of treaty interpretation. One of the stated reasons for this reluctance to rely on a Member's municipal law concepts and classifications is the concern that it would be inappropriate to characterize, for purposes of applying multilateral treaty provisions, the same thing differently depending on its legal categorization within the jurisdictions of different States.
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.