Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T19:05:45.421Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 1 - An Introduction to Hysteroscopy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 September 2020

By
Ayesha Mahmud ,
T. Justin Clark  and
Mary E. Connor
Edited by
Mary E. Connor  and
T. Justin Clark
Mary E. Connor
Affiliation:
Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield
T. Justin Clark
Affiliation:
Birmingham Women’s Hospital
Get access

Summary

Over the ages, clinicians have tried to decipher the mysteries of the human body by exploiting natural openings to examine the internal aspects of organs. Since as far back as Hippocrates, a variety of instruments have been employed to achieve this. The simplest form of instrument is a speculum, used to augment natural openings and allow ambient light to illuminate the inner aspect of organs for inspection by the naked eye. While this may be helpful for examining the nostrils or the vagina, for example, it is not an adequate approach for a well-concealed organ such as the uterus. Accurate endoscopic examination of the endometrial cavity, i.e. hysteroscopy, requires the transmission of light into and out of a cavity. Since the endometrial cavity is a potential space, collapsed in the natural state, a distension medium is required to expand the field of vision.

Type
Chapter
Information
Diagnostic and Operative Hysteroscopy , pp. 1 - 5
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Valle, R. Development of hysteroscopy: from a dream to a reality, and its linkage to the present and future. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2007; 14: 407–18.Google Scholar
Sardo, A, Calagna, G, Di Carlo, C. Tips and tricks in office hysteroscopy. Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther 2015; 4: 3–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, T, Voit, D, Gupta, J, et al. Accuracy of hysteroscopy in the diagnosis of endometrial cancer and hyperplasia. JAMA 2002; 288: 1610.Google Scholar
Nezhat, C. History of endoscopy. Chapter 4: Hovering on the brink of modernity. Online blog. https://laparoscopy.blogs.com/endoscopyhistory/chapter_04 (accessed November 2019).Google Scholar
Pearlman, SJ. Bozzini’s clinical treatise on endoscopy: a translation. Q Bull Northwest Univ Med Sch 1949; 23: 332–54. Originally published in German as: Bozzini P Der Lichtleiter oder die Beschreibung einer einfachen Vorrichtung und ihrer Anwendung zur Erleuchtung innerer Höhlen und Zwischenräume des lebenden animalischen Körpers. Weimar: Landesindustriecompoirs; 1807.Google Scholar
Desormeaux, AJ. De l’endoscope et de ses applications au diagnostic et au traitement des affections de l’urèthre et de la vessie. Paris: Baillère; 1865.Google Scholar
Cruise, FR. The utility of the endoscope as an aid in the diagnosis and treatment of disease. Dublin Q J Med Sci 1865; 39: 329–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pantaleoni, DC. On endoscopic examination of the cavity of the womb. Med Press Circular 1869; 8: 26–7.Google Scholar
Lindemann, HJ. Historical aspects of hysteroscopy. Fertil Steril 1973; 24: 230–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Porto, R. Hystéroscopie. Paris: Searle of France; 1975. Conception et réalisation Elpe/Paris.Google Scholar
Nitze, M. Eine neue Beleuchtungs und Untersuchungs-methode fur Harnrohre, Hamblase, und rectum. Wien Med Wochensch 1879; 29: 645–52.Google Scholar
David, C. Endoscopie de l’utérus après l’avortement et dans les suites de couches normales et pathologiques. Soc Obstet Paris 1907; 10: 288–97.Google Scholar
Heineberg, A. Uterine endoscopy: an aid to precision in the diagnosis of intra-uterine disease. A preliminary report, with the presentation of a new uteroscope. Surg Gynec Obstet 1914; 18: 513–15.Google Scholar
Rubin, IC. Uterine endoscopy, endometroscopy with the aid of uterine insufflation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1925; 10: 313–27.Google Scholar
Seymour, HF. Endoscopy of the uterus: with a description of a hysteroscope. J Obstet Gynecol Brit Emp 1926; 33: 52–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norment, WB, Sikes, CH, Berry, FX, Bird, J. Hysteroscopy. Surg Clin North Am 1957: 1377–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menken, FC. Endoscopic observations of endocrine process and hormonal changes. In Ruiz-Albrecht, F, Ramirez-Sanchez, J, Willowitzer, H, eds., Simposio Sobre Esteroides Sexuales. Proceedings of the Simposio Sobre Esteroides Sexuales. Museo Nacional, Bogota, Colombia, June 24–26, 1968. Berlin: Saladruck; 1969: 276–81.Google Scholar
Segond, R, L’hystéroscopie: état actuel de sa technique et son emploi clinique. Sem Hop Paris 1942; 9: 215–16.Google Scholar
Silander, T Hysteroscopy through a transparent rubber balloon. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1962; 114: 125–7.Google Scholar
Vulmière, J, Fourestier, M, Gladu, A. Hystéroscopie de contact. Perfectionnement à L’endoscopie médicale.Presse Médicale 1952; 60: 1292.Google Scholar
Mohri, T, Mohri, C, Yamadori, F. Tubaloscope flexible glassfiber endoscope for intratubal observation. Endoscopy 1970; 4: 226–30.Google Scholar
Edstrom, K, Fernstrom, I. The diagnostic possibilities of a modified hysteroscopic technique. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1970; 49: 327–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Porto, R, Serment, H. Pneumo-hystéroscopie. Gynecol Med Fr 1973; 80: 4985–8.Google Scholar
Goldrath, MH, Fuller, TA, Segal, S. Laser photovaporization of endometrium for the treatment of menorrhagia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1981; 140: 14–19.Google Scholar
Iglesias, JJ, Sporer, A, Gellman, AC, Seebode, JJ. New Iglesias resectoscope with continuous irrigation, simultaneous suction, and low intravesical pressure. J Urol 1975; 114: 929–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamou, JE. Microhystéroscopie: une nouvelle technique en endoscopie, ses applications. Acta Endoscopica 1980; 10: 415–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bettocchi, S, Ceci, O, Nappi, L, et al. Operative office hysteroscopy without anesthesia: analysis of 4863 cases performed with mechanical instruments. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2004; 11: 59–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bettocchi, S, Ceci, O, Di Venere, R, et al. Advanced operative office hysteroscopy without anaesthesia: analysis of 501 cases treated with a 5 Fr bipolar electrode. Hum Reprod 2002; 17: 2435–8.Google Scholar
Clark, TJ, Godwin, J, Khan, KS, Gupta, JK. Ambulatory endoscopic treatment of symptomatic benign endometrial polyps: a feasibility study. Gynaecol Endosc 2002; 11: 91–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huvar, I, Tinga, D, Pilka, L. Hysteroscopic sterilization using Ovabloc. Ceska Gynekol 1994; 59(4): 193–5.Google Scholar
Valle, RF, Cooper, JM, Kerin, JF. Hysteroscopic tubal sterilization with the Essure no incisional permanent contraception system. Obstet Gynecol 2002; 99(suppl): S11.Google Scholar
Palmer, SN, Greenberg, JA Transcervical sterilization: a comparison of Essure® permanent birth control system and Adiana® permanent contraception system. Rev Obstet Gynecol 2009; 2: 84–92.Google Scholar
Emanuel, MH, Wamsteker, K. The intra uterine morcellator: a new hysteroscopic operating technique to remove intrauterine polyps and myomas. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2005; 12: 62–6.Google Scholar
Smith, PP, Middleton, LJ, Connor, M, Clark, TJ. Hysteroscopic morcellation compared with electrical resection of endometrial polyps: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 123: 745–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cooper, NAM, Barton, PM, Breijer, MC, et al. Cost-effectiveness of diagnostic strategies for the management of abnormal uterine bleeding (heavy menstrual bleeding and post-menopausal bleeding): a decision analysis. Health Technol Assess 2014; 18(24): 1–201.Google Scholar
Moawad, NS, Santamaria, E, Johnson, M, Shuster, J. Cost-effectiveness of office hysteroscopy for abnormal uterine bleeding. JSLS 2014; 18.Google Scholar
Di Spiezio Sardo, A, Bettocchi, S, Spinelli, M, et al. Review of new office-based hysteroscopic procedures 2003–2009. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2010; 17: 436–48.Google Scholar
Mahmud, A, Smith, P, Clark, J The role of hysteroscopy in diagnosis of menstrual disorders. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2015; 29: 898–907.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grimbizis, GF, Tsolakidis, D, Mikos, T, et al. A prospective comparison of transvaginal ultrasound, saline infusion sonohysterography, and diagnostic hysteroscopy in the evaluation of endometrial pathology. Fertil Steril 2010; 94: 2720–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×