Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-669899f699-vbsjw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-29T02:49:22.726Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Developmental Dyslexia in Hebrew

from Part I - Developmental Dyslexia across Languages and Writing Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 September 2019

By
David L. Share ,
Michal Shany  and
Orly Lipka
Edited by
Ludo Verhoeven ,
Charles Perfetti  and
Kenneth Pugh
Ludo Verhoeven
Affiliation:
Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen
Charles Perfetti
Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh
Kenneth Pugh
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Get access

Summary

Research on Hebrew-speaking dyslexics, in many ways, is a microcosm of dyslexia research in the mainstream English-language literature. Familiar universal themes are evident, such as phonology and morphology, together with the current “race” to identify basic underlying perceptual and brain mechanisms of dyslexia, which has yet to reach consensus. Less familiar language-specific/script-specific issues are also apparent, such as diacritics and homography. Several original, “homegrown” theories have emerged regarding the underlying mechanisms of dyslexia as well as a novel subtyping scheme. We begin by outlining the characteristics of the Hebrew language and writing system before sketching the process of learning to read. A third section provides a brief historical survey of the legislative and service-delivery frameworks that have evolved over the years since the establishment of the State of Israel in 1948. Identification and assessment of dyslexia are then considered, followed by a review of a second generation of behavioral and neurocognitive research published since a previous review (Share, 2003).

Type
Chapter
Information
Developmental Dyslexia across Languages and Writing Systems , pp. 152 - 175
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Ahissar, M. (2007). Dyslexia and the anchoring-deficit hypothesis. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 458–465.Google Scholar
Ahissar, M., Lubin, Y., Putter-Katz, H., & Banai, K. (2006). Dyslexia and the failure to form a perceptual anchor. Nature Neuroscience, 9, 1558–1564.Google Scholar
Al-Yagon, M., & Margalit, M. (2001). Special and inclusive education in Israel. Mediterranean Journal of Educational Studies, 6, 93–112.Google Scholar
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.Google Scholar
Amitay, S., Ben-Yehudah, G., Banai, K., & Ahissar, M. (2002). Disabled readers suffer from visual and auditory impairments but not from a specific magnocellular deficit. Brain, 125, 2272–2285.Google Scholar
Amitay, S., Ben-Yehudah, G., Banai, K., & Ahissar, M. (2003). Reply to: Visual magnocellular deficits in dyslexia. Brain, 126, e3.Google Scholar
Avishar, G., & Layser, Y. (2000). Evaluating values in special education as change in education [in Hebrew]. Halacha veMa’ashe b’Tichnun Limudim, 15, 97–124.Google Scholar
Avissar, G. (2012). Inclusive education in Israel from a curriculum perspective: An exploratory study. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 27, 35–49.Google Scholar
Badcock, N., Ewing, L., Preece, K., Jeffery, L., Rhodes, G., & McArthur, G. (2013, June). Reading and language abilities are related to auditory perceptual anchoring in children with learning difficulties. Poster session presented at the Language in Developmental and Acquired disorders: Future directions, The Royal Society at Chicheley Hall, Chicheley, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
Bar-Kochva, I. (2016). An examination of an intervention program designed to enhance reading and spelling through the training of morphological decomposition in word recognition. Scientific Studies of Reading, 20, 163–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bar-On, A., & Ravid, D. (2011). Morphological analysis in learning to read pseudowords in Hebrew. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32, 553–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beidas, H., Khateb, A., & Breznitz, Z. (2013). The cognitive profile of adult dyslexics and its relation to their reading abilities. Reading and Writing, 26, 1487–1515.Google Scholar
Ben-Artzi, E., Fostick, L., & Babkoff, H. (2005). Deficits in temporal-order judgments in dyslexia: Evidence from dichotic stimuli differing spectrally and from dichotic stimuli differing only by perceived location. Neuropsychologia, 43, 714–723.Google Scholar
Ben-Dror, I., Bentin, S., & Frost, R. (1995). Semantic, phonologic, and morphologic skills in reading disabled and normal children: Evidence from perception and production of spoken Hebrew. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 876–893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ben-Dror, I., Frost, R., & Bentin, S. (1995). Orthographic representation and phonemic segmentation in skilled readers: A cross-language comparison. Psychological Science, 6, 176–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ben-Simon, A., & Inbar-Weiss, N. (2013). MATAL: A computer-based test battery for the diagnosis of learning disabilities: User guide. Jerusalem: National Institute for Testing and Evaluation NITE.Google Scholar
Bentin, S., Deutsch, A., & Liberman, I. Y. (1990). Syntactic competence and reading ability in children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 49, 147–172.Google Scholar
Bentin, S., & Leshem, H. (1993). On the interaction between phonological awareness and reading acquisition: It’s a two-way street. Annals of Dyslexia, 43, 125–148.Google Scholar
Ben-Yehudah, G., & Ahissar, M. (2004). Sequential spatial frequency discrimination is consistently impaired among adult dyslexics. Vision Research, 44, 1047–1063.Google Scholar
Ben-Yehudah, G., Sackett, E., Malchi-Ginzberg, L., & Ahissar, M. (2001). Impaired temporal contrast sensitivity in dyslexics is specific to retain-and-compare paradigms. Brain, 124, 1381–1395.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berman, R. (1985). The acquisition of Hebrew. In Slobin, D. I. (Ed.), The cross-linguistic study of language acquisition (pp. 255–371). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bishop, D. V. M. (2015). The interface between genetics and psychology: Lessons from developmental dyslexia. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 282(1806), 20143139.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Breznitz, Z. (2002a). Asynchrony of visual-orthographic and auditory-phonological word recognition processes: An underlying factor in dyslexia. Reading and Writing, 15, 15–42.Google Scholar
Breznitz, Z. (2002b). The frequency of reading difficulties and characterization of reading disability in students from the fourth grade in the Jewish population in the state of Israel. Report to the chief scientist of the Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
Breznitz, Z. (2006). Fluency in reading: Synchronization of processes. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breznitz, Z., & Misra, M. (2003). Speed of processing of the visual–orthographic and auditory–phonological systems in adult dyslexics: The contribution of “asynchrony” to word recognition deficits. Brain and Language, 85, 486–502.Google Scholar
Breznitz, Z., Shaul, S., Horowitz-Kraus, T., Sela, I., Nevat, M., & Karni, A. (2013). Enhanced reading by training with imposed time constraint in typical and dyslexic adults. Nature Communications, 4, 1486.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chase, C., & Stein, J. (2003). Visual magnocellular deficits in dyslexia. Brain, 126, e2.Google Scholar
Clark, L. A., Cuthbert, B., Lewis-Fernández, R., Narrow, W. E., & Reed, G. M. (2017). Three approaches to understanding and classifying mental disorder: ICD-11, DSM-5, and the National Institute of Mental Health’s Research Domain Criteria (RDoC). Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 18, 72–145.Google Scholar
Cohen-Mimran, R. (2006). Temporal processing deficits in Hebrew speaking children with reading disabilities. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49, 127–137.Google Scholar
Conner, P. S. (2013). Novel spoken word learning in adults with developmental dyslexia. Unpublished doctoral dissertation.The City University of New York.Google Scholar
Dahan, O., Melzer, Y., & Finkelstein, G. (2011). Changes in the integration of students with learning disabilities in higher education in Israel. In Avishar, G., Laizer, Y., & Reiter, S. (Eds.), Shiluvim (Integration): Education and society systems (pp. 315–343). Haifa, Israel: Achva.Google Scholar
Dahan, O., & Russak, S. (2005). A support center for students with learning disabilities – community partnership. Issues in Special Education and Rehabilitation, 20(2), 85–92.Google Scholar
Dai, L., Zhang, C., & Liu, X. (2016). A special Chinese reading acceleration training paradigm to enhance the reading fluency and comprehension of Chinese children with reading disabilities. Frontiers of Psychology, 7, 1937.Google Scholar
D’Amato, R. C., Crepeau-Hobson, F., Huang, L. V., & Geil, M. (2005). Ecological neuropsychology: An alternative to the deficit model for conceptualizing and serving students with learning disabilities. Neuropsychology review, 15, 97–103.Google Scholar
Daniels, P. T. (1990). Fundamentals of grammatology. Journal of the American Oriental Society, 110, 727–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daniels, P. T., & Bright, W. (Eds.). (1996). The world’s writing systems. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Di Filippo, G., Zoccolotti, P., & Ziegler, J. C. (2008). Rapid naming deficits in dyslexia: A stumbling block for the perceptual anchor theory of dyslexia. Developmental Science, 11(6), 40–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diringer, D. (1948). The alphabet: A key to the history of mankind. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Faust, M., Dimitrovsky, L., & Shacht, T. (2003). Naming difficulties in children with dyslexia: Application of the tip of the tongue paradigm. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36, 203–216.Google Scholar
Faust, M., & Sharfstein-Friedman, S. (2003). Naming difficulties in adolescents with dyslexia: Application of the tip-of-the-tongue paradigm. Brain and Cognition, 53, 211–217.Google Scholar
Fostick, L., Bar-El, S., & Ram-Tsur, R. (2012). Auditory temporal processing and working memory: Two independent deficits for dyslexia. Psychology Research, 2, 308–318.Google Scholar
Fostick, L., Eshcoly, R., Shtibelman, H., Nehemia, R., & Levi, H. (2014). Efficacy of temporal processing training to improve phonological awareness among dyslexic and normal reading students. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40, 1799–1807.Google Scholar
Friedman., I., & Philosoph, S. (2001). Standards in education systems [in Hebrew]. Jerusalem: Henrietta Szold Institute.Google Scholar
Frost, R., & Bentin, S. (1992). Processing phonological and semantic ambiguity: Evidence from semantic priming at different SOAs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 58–68.Google Scholar
Frost, R., Forster, K. I., & Deutsch, A. (1997). What can we learn from the morphology of Hebrew? A masked-priming investigation of morphological representation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 829–856.Google Scholar
Gabay, Y., Gabay, S., Schiff, R., Ashkenazi, S., & Henik, A. (2013). Visuospatial attention deficits in developmental dyslexia: evidence from visual and mental number line bisection tasks. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 28, 829–836.Google Scholar
Gabay, Y., & Holt, L. L. (2015). Incidental learning of sound categories is impaired in developmental dyslexia. Cortex, 73, 131–143.Google Scholar
Gabay, Y., Schiff, R., & Vakil, E. (2012a). Attentional requirements during acquisition and consolidation of a skill in normal readers and developmental dyslexics. Neuropsychology, 26, 744–757.Google Scholar
Gabay, Y., Schiff, R., & Vakil, E. (2012b). Dissociation between online and offline learning in developmental dyslexia. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 34, 279–288.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gabay, Y., Schiff, R., & Vakil, E. (2012c). Dissociation between the procedural learning of letter names and motor sequences in developmental dyslexia. Neuropsychologia, 50, 2435–2441.Google Scholar
Gabay, Y., Thiessen, E. D., & Holt, L. L. (2015). Impaired statistical learning in developmental dyslexia. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 58, 934–945.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gumpel, T. P. (1999). Special education towards the second millennium: Where have we come from and where are we going? [in Hebrew]. Issues in Special Education and Rehabilitation, 14(2), 71–82.Google Scholar
Gumpel, T. P., & Sharoni, V. (2007). Current best practices in learning disabilities in Israel. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 22, 202–209.Google Scholar
Heth, I., & Lavidor, M. (2015). Improved reading measures in adults with dyslexia following transcranial direct current stimulation treatment. Neuropsychologia, 70, 107–113.Google Scholar
Horowitz-Kraus, T., & Breznitz, Z. (2014). Can reading rate acceleration improve error monitoring and cognitive abilities underlying reading in adolescents with reading difficulties and in typical readers? Brain Research, 1544, 1–14.Google Scholar
Horowitz-Kraus, T., Cicchino, N., Amiel, M., Holland, S. K., & Breznitz, Z. (2014). Reading improvement in English and Hebrew-Speaking children with reading difficulties after reading acceleration training. Annals of Dyslexia, 64(3), 183–201.Google Scholar
Kahta, S., & Schiff, R. (2016). Implicit learning deficits among adults with developmental dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 66, 235–250.Google Scholar
Kaminsky, M., Eviatar, Z., & Norman, J. (2002). The timing deficit hypothesis of dyslexia and its implications for Hebrew reading. Brain and Cognition, 48, 394–398.Google Scholar
Kasperski, R., Shany, M., & Katzir, T. (2016). The role of RAN and reading rate in predicting reading self-concept. Reading and Writing, 29, 117–136.Google Scholar
Katzir, T., Kim, Y. S., Wolf, M., Morris, R., & Lovett, M. W. (2008). The varieties of pathways to dysfluent reading: Comparing subtypes of children with dyslexia at letter, word, and connected text levels of reading. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41, 47–66.Google Scholar
Katzir, T., Lesaux, N. K., & Kim, Y. S. (2009). The role of reading self-concept and home literacy practices in fourth grade reading comprehension. Reading and Writing, 22, 261–276.Google Scholar
Katzir, T., Markovich, V., Tesler, E., & Shany., M. (2018). Self-regulation and reading comprehension: Self-perceptions, self-evaluations, and effective strategies for intervention. In Meltzer, L. (Ed.), Executive function in education: From theory to practice (pp. 240–262). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Leikin, M., & Assayag Bouskila, O. (2004). Expression of syntactic complexity in sentence comprehension: A comparison between dyslexic and regular readers. Reading and Writing, 17, 801–822.Google Scholar
Leikin, M., & Even-Zur, H. (2006). Morphological processing in adult dyslexia. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 35, 471–490.Google Scholar
Lum, J. A., Ullman, M. T., & Conti-Ramsden, G. (2013). Procedural learning is impaired in dyslexia: Evidence from a meta-analysis of serial reaction time studies. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34, 3460–3476.Google Scholar
Margalit, M. (1997 ). Report of the public committee to explore the advancement of abilities among Students with learning disabilities. Report submitted to the Ministry of Education, Culture, and Science. Jerusalem: Ministry of Education, Culture and Science.Google Scholar
Margalit, M. (2000). Report of a committee for examination of implementation of the law for special education (Margalit Report). Jerusalem: Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
MATAL. (2007). A computer-based test battery for the diagnosis of learning disabilities (2007). Jerusalem: National institute for Testing and Evaluation and the Council of Higher Education in Israel.Google Scholar
Meer, Y., Breznitz, Z., & Katzir, T. (2016). Calibration of self‐reports of anxiety and physiological measures of anxiety while reading in adults with and without reading disability. Dyslexia, 22, 267–284.Google Scholar
Meltzer, Y. (2003). A plan of Renovation and equipping a support center building for Learning Disabilities students (unpublished). Jerusalem: National Insurance Institute. Fund for developing services for disabled people.Google Scholar
Miller-Shaul, S. (2005). The characteristics of young and adult dyslexics readers on reading and reading related cognitive tasks as compared to normal readers. Dyslexia, 11, 132–151.Google Scholar
Ministry of Education. (2016). From disabilities to learning. System plan for intervention for students with learning disabilities and ADHD. Jerusalem: Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
Oganian, Y., & Ahissar, M. (2012). Poor anchoring limits dyslexics’ perceptual, memory, and reading skills. Neuropsychologia, 50, 1895–1905.Google Scholar
Pennington, B. F. (2006). From single to multiple deficit models of developmental disorders. Cognition, 101, 385–413.Google Scholar
Ram-Tsur, R., Faust, M., & Zivotofsky, A. Z. (2006). Sequential processing deficits of reading disabled persons is independent of inter-stimulus interval. Vision Research, 46, 3949–3960.Google Scholar
Ram-Tsur, R., Faust, M., & Zivotofsky, A. Z. (2008). Poor performance on serial visual tasks in persons with reading disabilities impaired working memory? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41, 437–450.Google Scholar
Ramus, F., Rosen, S., Dakin, S. C., Day, B. L., Castellote, J. M., White, S., & Frith, U. (2003). Theories of developmental dyslexia: insights from a multiple case study of dyslexic adults. Brain, 126, 841–865.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raveh, M., & Schiff, R. (2008). Visual and auditory morphological priming in adults with developmental dyslexia. Scientific Studies of Reading, 12, 221–252.Google Scholar
Ravid, D. (1990). Internal structure constraints on new-word formation devices in Modern Hebrew. Folia Linguistica, 24(3–4), 289–346.Google Scholar
Ravid, D. (1996). Accessing the mental lexicon: Evidence from incompatibility between representation of spoken and written morphology. Linguistics, 34, 1219–1246.Google Scholar
Ravid, D. (2012). Spelling morphology. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Rubinsten, O., & Henik, A. (2006). Double dissociation of functions in developmental dyslexia and dyscalculia. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 854–867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiff, R., Cohen, M., Ben-Artzi, , Sasson, A., & Ravid, D. (2016). Auditory morphological knowledge among children with developmental dyslexia. Scientific Studies of Reading, 20, 140–154.Google Scholar
Schiff, R., & Raveh, M. (2007). Deficient morphological processing in adults with developmental dyslexia: Another barrier to efficient word recognition? Dyslexia, 13, 110–129.Google Scholar
Schiff, R., & Ravid, D. (2004). Representing written vowels in university students with dyslexia compared with normal Hebrew readers. Annals of Dyslexia, 54, 39–64.Google Scholar
Schiff, R., & Ravid, D. (2007). Morphological analogies in Hebrew-speaking university students with dyslexia compared with typically developing grade schoolers. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 36, 237–253.Google Scholar
Schiff, R., & Ravid, D. (2013). Morphological processing in Hebrew-speaking students with reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 46, 220–229. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022219412449425.Google Scholar
Schiff, R., Schwartz-Nahshon, S., & Nagar, R. (2011). Effect of phonological and morphological awareness on reading comprehension in Hebrew-speaking adolescents with reading disabilities. Annals of Dyslexia, 61, 44–63.Google Scholar
Sela, I., & Karni, A. (2012). Differences in learning volitional (manual) and non-volitional (posture) aspects of a complex motor skill in young adult dyslexic and skilled readers. PLoS One, 7(9): e43488. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0043488.Google Scholar
Shalev-Leifer, C. (2016). On the link between developmental dyslexia and specific language impairment in Hebrew: Cognitive and psycholinguistic aspects. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Haifa.Google Scholar
Shany, M., & Breznitz, Z. (2011). Rate- and accuracy-disabled subtype profiles among adults with dyslexia in the Hebrew orthography. Developmental Neuropsychology, 36, 889–913.Google Scholar
Shany, M., Lachman, D., Shalem, Z., Bahat, A., & Zeiger, T. (2006). “Aleph-Taph” – a test for the diagnosis of reading and writing disabilities, based on national Israeli norms. Tel Aviv: Yesod Publishing.Google Scholar
Shany, M., & Share, D. L. (2011). Subtypes of reading disability in a shallow orthography: A double dissociation between accuracy-disabled and rate-disabled reading in Hebrew. Annals of Dyslexia, 61, 64–84.Google Scholar
Share, D. L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55, 151–218.Google Scholar
Share, D. L. (2003). Dyslexia in Hebrew. In Goulandris, N. (Ed.), Dyslexia in different languages: Cross-linguistic comparisons (pp. 208–234). London: Whurr.Google Scholar
Share, D. L. (2004). Orthographic learning at a glance: On the time course and developmental onset of self-teaching. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 87, 267–298.Google Scholar
Share, D. L., & Bar-On, A. (2017). Learning to read a Semitic Abjad: The Triplex model of Hebrew reading development. Journal of Learning Disabilities. Advance online publication. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022219417718198.Google Scholar
Shaul, S. (2014). Visual, auditory and cross modal lexical decision: A comparison between dyslexic and typical readers. Psychology, 5, 1855–1869. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/psych.2014.516191.Google Scholar
Shovman, M. M., & Ahissar, M. (2006). Isolating the impact of visual perception on dyslexics’ reading ability. Vision Research, 46, 3514–3525.Google Scholar
Simpson, S. (1983). Dyslexia theory and practice, assessment and enhancement of reading disability. Tel Aviv: Ramot Publication.Google Scholar
Special Education Law. (2002). Instructions, chapter D1 for Special Education Law, 4763 [Correction number 7 for Special Education Law, 1988].Google Scholar
Tallal, P. (1980). Auditory temporal perception, phonics, and reading disabilities in children. Brain and language, 9, 182–198.Google Scholar
Vogel, S. A., Vogel, G., Sharoni, V., & Dahan, O. (Eds.). (2003). Learning disabilities in higher education and beyond: An international perspective. Baltimore, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Willburger, E., & Landerl, K. (2010). Anchoring the deficit of the anchor deficit: Dyslexia or attention? Dyslexia, 16, 175–182.Google Scholar
Wolf, M., & Bowers, P. G. (1999). The double-deficit hypothesis for the developmental dyslexias. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 415–438.Google Scholar
Yunay, Y. (1992). The 1988 National Special Education Law. Education of special education students. Jerusalem: Ministry of Education and Culture.Google Scholar
Ziegler, J. C. (2008). Better to lose the anchor than the whole ship. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 244–245.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×