Discerning lies from truths: behavioural cues to deception and the indirect pathway of intuition

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511490071.002

2 - Discerning lies from truths: behavioural cues to deception and the indirect pathway of intuition

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 September 2009

Bella M. DePaulo and

Wendy L. Morris

Edited by

Pär Anders Granhag and

Leif A. Strömwall

Show author details

Bella M. DePaulo: Affiliation:
University of Virginia, USA
Wendy L. Morris: Affiliation:
University of Virginia, USA
Pär Anders Granhag: Affiliation:
Göteborgs Universitet, Sweden
Leif A. Strömwall: Affiliation:
Göteborgs Universitet, Sweden

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Can you tell whether suspects are lying based on what they say, how they say it, how they sound when they say it, or how they look? Can you do so even without any special equipment, such as a polygraph to monitor physiological responses (Honts, this volume) or a camera to record interviews, which can then be studied in microscopic detail (O'Sullivan and Ekman, this volume)? These are the questions we will address in this chapter.

Reading this chapter will not give anyone grounds for feeling smug about his or her deception detection prowess in forensic contexts (nor in any other contexts, for that matter). The study of verbal and non-verbal behavioural cues to deception is an inexact science, and probably always will be. We will offer hints, based on the current state of the science, about the kinds of behaviours that are more or less likely to intimate that a suspect may be lying. Our suggestions may be of some value in cases in which more definitive evidence, such as DNA, is not available or has not yet been uncovered. We hope our review will also prove useful in demonstrating why sweeping statements about perfect cues to deception are deserving of deep scepticism.

There are two fundamental questions in the study of verbal and nonverbal cues to deception. First, are there any such cues? That is, are there any behaviours that indicate whether a person may be lying?

Type: Chapter
Information: The Detection of Deception in Forensic Contexts , pp. 15 - 40

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511490071.002 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Anderson, D. E. (1999). Cognitive and motivational processes underlying truth bias. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Virginia

Anderson, D. E., DePaulo, B. M., and Ansfield, M. E. (2002). The development of deception detection skill: A longitudinal study of samesex friends. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 536–45CrossRef Google Scholar

Anderson, D. E., DePaulo, B. M., Ansfield, M. E., Tickle, J. J., and Green, E. (1999). Beliefs about cues to deception: Mindless stereotypes or untapped wisdom?Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 23, 67–89CrossRef Google Scholar

Bond, C. F., Jr, and DePaulo, B. M. (2004). Accuracy and truth bias in the detection of deception. Manuscript in preparation

Bond, C. F. Jr, and Fahey, W. E. (1987). False suspicion and the misperception of deceit. British Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 41–6CrossRef Google Scholar

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (rev. edn). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum

DePaulo, B. M., Charlton, K., Cooper, H., Lindsay, J. J., and Muhlenbruck, L. (1997). The accuracy–confidence correlation in the detection of deception. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 346–57CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

DePaulo, B. M., Jordan, A., Irvine, A., and Laser, P. S. (1982). Age changes in the detection of deception. Child Development, 53, 701–9CrossRef Google Scholar

DePaulo, B. M., and Kirkendol, S. E. (1989). The motivational impairment effect in the communication of deception. In J. C. Yuille (ed.), Credibility assessment (pp. 51–70). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer AcademicCrossRef

DePaulo, B. M., Lindsay, J. J., Malone, B. E., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K., and Cooper, H. (2003). Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 74–118CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

DePaulo, B. M., and Rosenthal, R. (1979). Telling lies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1713–22CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

DePaulo, B. M., Rosenthal, R., Green, C. R., and Rosenkrantz, J. (1982). Diagnosing deceptive and mixed messages from verbal and non-verbal cues. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18, 433–46CrossRef Google Scholar

Ekman, P. (1985). Telling lies. New York: Norton. (Reprinted, 1992.)

Ekman, P., Friesen, W. V., and O'Sullivan, M. (1988). Smiles while lying. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 414–20CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Granhag, P. A., and Strömwall, L. A. (2000). Deception detection: Examining the consistency heuristic. In C. M. Breur, M. M. Kommer, J. F. Nijboer, and J. M. Reintjes, (eds.), New trends in criminal investigation and evidence II (pp. 309–21). Antwerpen: Intersentia

Hall, M. E. (1986). Detecting deception in the voice: An analysis of fundamental frequency, syllabic duration, and amplitude of the human voice. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University

Horvath, F. S. (1973). Verbal and non-verbal clues to truth and deception during polygraph examinations. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 1, 138–52Google Scholar

Horvath, F., Jayne, B. C., and Buckley, J. (1994). Differentiation of truthful and deceptive criminal suspects in behaviour analysis interviews. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 39, 793–807CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Hurd, K., and Noller, P. (1988). Decoding deception: A look at the process. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 12, 217–33CrossRef Google Scholar

Inbau, F. E., Reid, J. E., Buckley, J. P., and Jayne, B. C. (2001). Criminal interrogation and confessions (4th edn). Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen

Vrij, A. (2000). Detecting lies and deceit. Chichester, England: John Wiley

Vrij, A., Akehurst, L., and Morris, P. (1997). Individual differences in hand movements during deception. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 21, 87–101CrossRef Google Scholar

Vrij, A., Edward, K., and Bull, R. (2001). Police officers' ability to detect deceit: The benefit of indirect deception detection measures. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 6, 185–96CrossRef Google Scholar

Yuille, J. C., and Cutshall, J. (1989). Analysis of statements of victims, witnesses, and suspects. In J. C. Yuille (ed.), Credibility assessment (pp. 175–91). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer AcademicCrossRef