Book contents
- Designing Adaptive Organizations
- Cambridge Companions to Management
- Designing Adaptive Organizations
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- 1 Design Thinking in Organization Design
- 2 The Open Organization
- 3 Actor-Oriented Organizing
- 4 Collaborative Conflict Management
- 5 The Platform Organization
- 6 Circular Organizing
- 7 Organizing Intelligent Digital Actors
- 8 Agile Organizing
- 9 The Global Organization
- 10 Performance-Focused Organizing
- 11 The Healthy Organization
- 12 Modern Organizing
- Index
- References
8 - Agile Organizing
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 November 2023
Book contents
- Designing Adaptive Organizations
- Cambridge Companions to Management
- Designing Adaptive Organizations
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- 1 Design Thinking in Organization Design
- 2 The Open Organization
- 3 Actor-Oriented Organizing
- 4 Collaborative Conflict Management
- 5 The Platform Organization
- 6 Circular Organizing
- 7 Organizing Intelligent Digital Actors
- 8 Agile Organizing
- 9 The Global Organization
- 10 Performance-Focused Organizing
- 11 The Healthy Organization
- 12 Modern Organizing
- Index
- References
Summary
The ability to organize is our most valuable social technology. Organizing affects an enterprise’s efficiency, effectiveness, and ability to adapt. Modern organizations operate in increasingly complex, dynamic environments, which puts a premium on adaptation. Compared to traditional organizations, modern organizations are flatter and more open to their environment. Their processes are more generative and interactive – actors themselves generate and coordinate solutions rather than follow hierarchically devised plans and directives. Modern organizations search outside their boundaries for resources wherever they may exist. They coproduce products and services with suppliers, customers, and partners. They collaborate, both internally and externally, to learn and become more capable. In this book, leading voices in the field of organization design articulate and exemplify how a combination of agile processes, artificial intelligence, and digital platforms powers adaptive, sustainable, and healthy organizations.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Designing Adaptive Organizations , pp. 143 - 154Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
References
Ackoff, R. L. 1999. Re-creating the Corporation: A Design of Organizations for the Twenty-First Century. Oxford University Press, New York, NY.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, K., Beedle, M., Van Bennekum, A. et al. 2001. The agile manifesto. www.agilealliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/agile-manifesto-download-2019.pdfGoogle Scholar
Birkinshaw, J. 2018. What to expect from agile. MIT Sloan Management Review, Special Collection: Redesigning Work: 39–42.Google Scholar
Brown, S. L. & Eisenhardt, K. M. 1997. The art of continuous change: linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly 42(1): 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, J. P., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Bingham, C. B. 2009. Optimal structure, market dynamism, and the strategy of simple rules. Administrative Science Quarterly 54(3): 413–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dikert, K., Paasivaara, M., & Lassenius, C. 2016. Challenges and success factors for large-scale agile transformations: a systematic literature review. Journal of Systems and Software 119: 87–108.Google Scholar
Doz, Y. & Kosonen, M. 2010. Embedding strategic agility: a leadership agenda for accelerating business model renewal. Long Range Planning 43(2–3): 370–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dybå, T., Dingsøyr, T. & Moe, N. B. 2014. Agile project management. In Ruhe, G. and Wohlin, C. (eds.), Software Project Management in a Changing World: 277–300. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, B., Lago, U., & Liu, F. 2013. Reinventing Giants: How Chinese Global Competitor Haier Has Changed the Way Big Companies Transform. Wiley, New York, NY.Google Scholar
Girod, S. J. G. & Karim, S. 2017. Restructure or reconfigure. Harvard Business Review 95(2): 128–132.Google Scholar
Girod, S. J. G. & Králik, M. 2021. Resetting Management: Thrive with Agility in the Age of Uncertainty. Kogan Page, London, UK.Google Scholar
Girod, S. J. G. & Whittington, R. 2017. Reconfiguration, restructuring and firm performance: dynamic capabilities and environmental dynamism. Strategic Management Journal 38(5): 1121–1133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Girod, S. J. G., Philadelpho Fernandes de Pina, E., Tanfour, M., & Svedjedal, S. 2018. ING: An agile organization in a disruptive environment. IMD Case IMD-7-1852.Google Scholar
Gothelf, J. 2014. Bring agile to the whole organization. Harvard Business Review, November 14. https://hbr.org/2014/11/bring-agile-to-the-whole-organizationGoogle Scholar
Gunasekaran, A. 1999. Agile manufacturing: a framework for research and development. International Journal of Production Economics 62(1–2): 87–105.Google Scholar
Haier.net. 2014. China’s Philosopher-CEO Zhang Ruimin. www.haier.net/en/about_haier/news/201411/t20141114_252267.shtml.Google Scholar
Hamel, G. & Zanini, M. 2018. The end of bureaucracy. Harvard Business Review 96(6): 50–59.Google Scholar
Hamel, G. & Zanini, M. 2020. Humanocracy: Creating Organizations as Amazing as the People inside Them. Harvard Business Review Press, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
Ivory, S. B. & Brooks, S. B. 2018. Managing corporate sustainability with a paradoxical lens: lessons from strategic agility. Journal of Business Ethics 148: 347–361.Google Scholar
Kalaignanam, K., Tuli, K. R., Kushwaha, T., Lee, L., & Gal, D. 2021. Marketing agility: the concept, antecedents, and a research agenda. Journal of Marketing 85(1): 35–58.Google Scholar
Kanter, R. M. & Dai, H. N. 2018. Haier: incubating entrepreneurs in a Chinese giant. Harvard Business School Case 9-318-104. Rev: May 25, 2018.Google Scholar
Lamont, B. T., Williams, R. J., & Hoffman, J. J. 1994. Performance during “M-Form” reorganization and recovery time: the effects of prior strategy and implementation speed. Academy of Management Journal 37(1): 153–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, J. G. 1991. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science 2(1): 71–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Reilly III, C. A. & Tushman, M. L. 2013. Organizational ambidexterity: past, present, and future. Academy of Management Perspectives 27(4): 324–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prange, C. & Heracleous, L. (eds.). 2018. Agility.X: How Organizations Thrive in Unpredictable Times. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Reeves, M., Haanaes, K., & Sinha, J. 2015. Your Strategy Needs a Strategy: How to Choose and Execute the Right Approach. Harvard Business Review Press, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
Ries, E. 2011. The Lean Startup: How Today’s Entrepreneurs Use Continuous Innovation to Create Radically Successful Businesses. Crown Publishing Group, New York, NY.Google Scholar
Rigby, D. K., Elk, S., & Berez, S. 2020. The agile C-suite: a new approach to leadership for the team at the top. Harvard Business Review 98(3): 64–73.Google Scholar
Rigby, D. K., Sutherland, J., & Takeuchi, H. 2016. Embracing agile. Harvard Business Review 94(5): 40–50.Google Scholar
Smite, D., Moe, N. B., Floryan, M., Levinta, G., & Chatzipetrou, P. 2020. Spotify guilds. Communications of the ACM 63(3): 56–61.Google Scholar
Smite, D., Moe, N. B., Levinta, G., & Floryan, M. 2019. Spotify guilds: how to succeed with knowledge sharing in large-scale agile organizations. IEEE Software 36(2): 51–57.Google Scholar
Takeuchi, H. & Nonaka, I. 1986. The new new product development game. Harvard Business Review 64(1): 137–146.Google Scholar
Teece, D., Peteraf, M., & Leih, S. 2016. Dynamic capabilities and organizational agility: risk, uncertainty, and strategy in the innovation economy. California Management Review 58(4): 13–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 1
- Cited by